Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Metal Catalyzed Asymmetric Hydrogenation Evolution and Prospect Ebook PDF
Metal Catalyzed Asymmetric Hydrogenation Evolution and Prospect Ebook PDF
ADVISORY BOARD
A. CORMA CANÓS
Valencia, Spain
G. ERTL
Berlin/Dahlem, Germany
B.C. GATES
Davis, California, USA
G. HUTCHINGS
Cardiff, UK
E. IGLESIA
Berkeley, California, USA
J. ROSTRUP-NIELSEN
Lyngby, Denmark
€
F. SCHUTH
M€
ulheim, Germany
J.M. THOMAS
London/Cambridge, England
Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier
50 Hampshire Street, 5th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States
525 B Street, Suite 1650, San Diego, CA 92101, United States
The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1GB, United Kingdom
125 London Wall, London, EC2Y 5AS, United Kingdom
No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic
or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system,
without permission in writing from the publisher. Details on how to seek permission, further
information about the Publisher’s permissions policies and our arrangements with organizations such
as the Copyright Clearance Center and the Copyright Licensing Agency, can be found at our website:
www.elsevier.com/permissions.
This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by the
Publisher (other than as may be noted herein).
Notices
Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and experience
broaden our understanding, changes in research methods, professional practices, or medical
treatment may become necessary.
Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in evaluating
and using any information, methods, compounds, or experiments described herein. In using such
information or methods they should be mindful of their own safety and the safety of others, including
parties for whom they have a professional responsibility.
To the fullest extent of the law, neither the Publisher nor the authors, contributors, or editors, assume
any liability for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability,
negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions, or ideas
contained in the material herein.
ISBN: 978-0-12-824569-9
ISSN: 0360-0564
Pher G. Andersson
Department of Organic Chemistry, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden; School of
Chemistry and Physics, University of Kwazulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
Maria Besora
Departament de Quı́mica Fı́sica i Inorgànica, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain
Maria Biosca
Department of Organic Chemistry, Arrhenius Laboratory, Stockholm University,
Stockholm, Sweden
Gen-Qiang Chen
Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Southern University of Science and
Technology of China, Shenzhen, China
Carmen Claver
Departament de Quı́mica Fı́sica i Inorgànica, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain
Montserrat Dieguez
Departament de Quı́mica Fı́sica i Inorgànica, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain
Jorge Faiges
Departament de Quı́mica Fı́sica i Inorgànica, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain
Jèssica Margalef
Departament de Quı́mica Fı́sica i Inorgànica, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain
Feliu Maseras
Institute of Chemical Research of Catalonia (ICIQ), The Barcelona Institute of Science and
Technology, Tarragona, Spain
Oscar Pàmies
Departament de Quı́mica Fı́sica i Inorgànica, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain
Antonio Pizzano
Instituto de Investigaciones Quı́micas (CSIC-Universidad de Sevilla), Seville, Spain
Antonio Zanotti-Gerosa
Johnson Matthey, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Xumu Zhang
Shenzhen Grubbs Institute and Department of Chemistry, Southern University of Science
and Technology, Shenzhen, China
Jia Zheng
Department of Organic Chemistry, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
vii
Preface
ix
x Preface
Asymmetric hydrogenation
of functionalized olefins
Antonio Pizzano∗
Instituto de Investigaciones Quı́micas (CSIC-Universidad de Sevilla), Seville, Spain
∗
Corresponding author: e-mail address: pizzano@iiq.csic.es
Contents
1. General considerations 2
2. Rhodium 3
2.1 Hydrogenation of enamides 3
2.2 Enol esters 32
2.3 Allyl alcohols 41
2.4 Conjugated esters, ketones, nitriles and related substrates 42
2.5 Nitro-olefins 60
2.6 Carboxylic acids 64
2.7 Kinetic resolution 73
3. Iridium 79
3.1 Carboxylic acids 79
3.2 Enamides and enol esters 86
3.3 Sulfones 90
3.4 Allyl substrates 93
3.5 Nitro-derivatives 98
3.6 Unsaturated carbonyl substrates 101
4. Ruthenium 110
5. Cobalt 116
6. Nickel 121
7. Concluding remarks 127
Acknowledgment 128
References 128
About the author 134
Abstract
The asymmetric hydrogenation of olefins containing functional groups constitutes one
of the most powerful tools for the synthesis of chiral compounds. Far from being an
exhausted field, the range of substrates that can be reduced with high efficiency is
continuously growing. Moreover, advancements in the knowledge of substrate-ligand
interactions have led to further improvement in catalyst efficiency. As well, recent
research in the application of first row transition metals has a great potential in the
expansion of the field. The present contribution covers the advances made in the hydro-
genation of functionalized olefins in the last decade (2011 2020). Results discussed in
the text mainly focus on progress in the synthesis of chiral compounds enabled by these
hydrogenations, although some mechanistic considerations have also been included to
give a better overview of the field.
1. General considerations
The asymmetric hydrogenation of olefins containing a functional
group to form a chelate complex by Rh catalysts is one of the processes
studied in more detail in the literature (Fig. 1) (1). In the case of dehydro-
aminoacids, this reaction has a prominent historical importance, since it is
associated with the roots of asymmetric catalysis and the paramount synthesis
of L-DOPA (2). Upon the basic features of the mechanism (3), the scope of
asymmetric olefin hydrogenation by Rh catalysts was impressively extended
by keeping a basic substrate framework composed by the olefin and a coor-
dinating carbonyl group (Fig. 1B), leading to a plethora of highly enantio-
selective hydrogenations of enamides and enol-esters (4). Moreover,
expansion of the research has shown that a great variety of functional groups
are compatible with the reaction, expanding the scope to unsaturated sulfones,
phosphonates, boronates or nitriles, among others. On the other hand, while
the application of iridium olefin hydrogenation catalysts has largely focused on
the hydrogenation of challenging unfunctionalized substrates (5), it has already
been recognized the great potential that Ir catalysts have in the hydrogenation
of functionalized olefins, since substrate structure is not limited by the need of
Fig. 1 (A) Common substrates for Rh catalyzed hydrogenation. (B) Coordination mode
of α-dehydroaminocids.
Asymmetric hydrogenation of functionalized olefins 3
2. Rhodium
2.1 Hydrogenation of enamides
Enamides constitute the main group of substrates for asymmetric hydro-
genation with Rh catalysts. The importance of this reaction was early recog-
nized by Knowles and Kagan with studies of the hydrogenation of
α-dehydroaminoacid derivatives (7). Later, Burk and coworkers significantly
improved the synthetic utility of this hydrogenation leading to a wide variety
of α-aminoacid derivatives with exceedingly high enantioselectivities (8).
Likewise, the asymmetric hydrogenation of aryl enamides constitutes a highly
important reaction (9). Despite these developments, the scope of the reaction
seems rather unlimited and relevant applications keep on appearing in the lit-
erature enabled by progress made in ligand design. Below are discussed some
recent progresses made in the reduction of this class of substrates.
The enantioselective hydrogenation of β-aryl enamides 1 has a great syn-
thetic interest due to the importance of the β-aryl amines as natural and phar-
maceutical products. Initial studies by X. Zhang and coworkers already
observed a high influence of the olefin configuration in the reduction of
these substrates (10). At this regard, the group of Zhou (11) has developed
highly enantioselective catalysts based on a monodentate phosphine (L1a)
for the E (81–97% ee) and phosphite (L1b) for Z (90–95% ee) isomers
(Scheme 1A). However, catalyst activity is not very high and reactions were
run at relatively high catalyst loading (S/C ¼ 50). Upon this background, an
effective catalyst for the hydrogenation of E isomers is of high interest as
these isomers are thermodynamically more stable than Z ones and, hence,
4 Antonio Pizzano
loading (S/C ¼ 50) was required to achieve full conversion under 10 atm of
H2 at 25 °C. Using these reaction conditions a set of acetamides bearing
differente heteroaryl substituents were prepared with enantioselectivities
between 94% and 99% ee.
α-Aminoboronic acids constitute a relevant class of compounds for the
pharmaceutical industry as mimics of α-aminoacids. In this regard,
W. Zhang and coworkers have described an efficient synthesis of α-amino-
boronic acid derivatives by the asymmetric hydrogenation of α-boryl
enamides 11 (Scheme 6) (19). In this reaction, a satisfactory synthesis of
desired product 12 must minimize the formation of deboronated products
13. A screening of the hydrogenation of representative substrate (Ar ¼ Ph)
using several Rh catalysts differing in the diphosphine ligand showed that
conversion, chemo- and enantioselectivity were highly dependent on the
nature of the diphoshine. For instance, Me-DuPhos catalyst provided a
good enantioselectivity (87% ee), while substantial amounts of deboron-
ated enamides were observed. Best enantioselectivities (95% ee) were
obtained by catalysts based on P-stereogenic BenzP* (L6b) and
QuinoxP* (L6a) diphosphines. Moreover, the former catalyst showed a
perfect chemoselectivity towards the formation of desired 12 (Ar ¼ Ph).
Further examination of the reaction scope using this catalyst showed high
enantioselectivities (92–99% ee) for a set of β-aryl derivatives. However,
Asymmetric hydrogenation of functionalized olefins 9
these substrates are not very reactive. The nitrogen protection as a carbamate,
typically less reactive than amides and the steric impediment offered by the
oxazolidinone and boronate groups, may explain this effect. Accordingly,
some substrates along the series (Ar ¼ 2-MeO-C6H4, 3-MeO-C6H4, 3-Cl-
C6H4) required relatively high catalyst loadings (4 mol%) to reach satisfactory
conversions.
The asymmetric hydrogenation of α-acetamido α,β-unsaturated alde-
hydes 14 (Scheme 7) constitutes a great challenge for asymmetric hydrogena-
tion, as it requires a chemoselective hydrogenation of the olefin while keeping
the aldehyde function unreacted. In addition, in the case of Rh catalyzed pro-
cesses a competitive reaction pathway is aldehyde decarbonylation (20). On
(80 atm H2, rt) of model substrate (R ¼ Ph) in MeOH as a Z/E 2:1 isomeric
mixture, although a relatively high catalyst loading was used (S/C ¼ 50).
Under these reaction conditions, the screening of diverse diphosphines
pointed to catalyst based on DuanPhos (L4) as the more enantioselective
one, although only a conversion of 30% was observed under these reaction
conditions after 24 h. Further analysis to improve catalyst activity detected
a positive effect of alternative alcohols with improvements of conversion in
EtOH (83), TFE (78) and particularly in iPrOH (81), which also provided
the best enantioselectivity (98% ee). Probably due to some catalyst inhibition
effect, a positive influence of the dilution of the substrate was observed.
Thus, conversion was increased from 81% at a substrate concentration of
0.05 M to 99% at 0.017 M, without affecting the product enantiomeric
excess. Worth to note, no influence on enantioselectivity of the E/Z ratio
of isomers was observed. Under these optimized reaction conditions the
scope of the catalytic system was examined using E/Z mixtures which
ranged from 1:2 to 1:9. Thus, for substrates bearing a β-aryl substituent
corresponding products were obtained with yields between 76% and 97%
and high enantioselectivities (86–99% ee). The reaction is also suitable for
heterocyclic substrates as 2-furyl and 2-thienyl were hydrogenated with
99 and 97% ee, respectively. In contrast, no reaction was observed in the
case of a tBu substituted substrate.
A very challenging goal in the field of Rh hydrogenation is the obtention
of diarylalanine derivatives 33 (Scheme 13) with good levels of catalyst activ-
ity and enantioselectivity, as it requires the hydrogenation of sterically hin-
dered tetrasubstituted enamides 32 bearing two aryl groups at position β.
In the case of unequal substituents the hydrogenation would generate
two stereocenters simultaneously. In this regard, a catalytic system capable
to generate any of the four possible stereoisomers with a high selectivity
would be of great interest. Towards this goal, Molinaro and coworkers have
described an extremely versatile synthetic procedure for the synthesis of
β,β’-diaryl-α-aminoacid derivatives 33 (28), which comprises both the
stereoselective formation of the required enamides 32 and their highly selec-
tive hydrogenation. The range of substrates includes N-acetyl, N-methoxy-
carbonyl and valuable N-Boc derivatives with a great variety of aryl
substituents at position β and with a defined olefin configuration. An exten-
sive screening pointed to catalysts based on C1 symmetric ferrocenyl
diphosphines of the Josiphos family bearing a P(tBu)2 fragment bonded to
the stereogenic carbon and a PAr2 cyclopentadienyl substituent containing
electron-withdrawing aryl substituents (4-CF3Ph, 2-furyl), as the most
16 Antonio Pizzano
suitable ones for this reaction. This electronic difference between phosphino
fragments is an interesting feature and resembles that of catalysts based
on heterobidentate phosphine-phosphite and phosphine-phosphoramidite
ligands (29). Compared with N-acetyl enamides, corresponding N-Boc
derivatives are usually less reactive towards hydrogenation due to the lower
coordinating ability of the corresponding carbonyl group as well as to a
higher steric encumbrance. This trend is observed in the series of com-
pounds 32 and the hydrogenation of N-Boc enamides required a higher
reaction temperature to obtain satisfactory rates even at a relatively high cat-
alyst loading (10 mol%). An indicative of the degree of difficulty of these
hydrogenation arises from comparison of structures of precursor enamides
of N-Boc-β-phenylalanine and N-Boc-β,β-diphenylalanine methyl esters.
While the Ph group is coplanar with the olefin fragment in the former, steric
effects caused by the two aryl groups in the latter promotes a twisted con-
formation of the aryl groups, therefore difficulting the coordination of the
olefin. By the application of different hydrogenation conditions for N-acetyl
(400 psi H2, 5 mol%, rt., MeOH) and N-Boc substrates (120 psi H2, 10 mol
%, 80 °C, IPA) a great variety of β,β’-diarylalanine derivatives were obtained
with high levels of enantio- and diastereoselectivity. Notably, a single diaste-
reomer was produced in these hydrogenations, indicating the absence of ole-
fin isomerization during the reaction. Thus, as the configuration of Cα is
determined by the configuration of the catalyst and that of Cβ by the con-
figuration of the olefin, the procedure is suitable for the generation of any of
the four possible stereoisomers of compounds 33.
In connection with the latter study, the asymmetric hydrogenation of
β,β-diaryl enamide 34 constitutes a key step in the industrial synthesis of
diarylalanine derivative 35 (Scheme 14) (30). A wide catalyst screening
led to Ph-BPE (L11a) and PhanePhos (L12) based catalysts as the more
effective ones giving conversion values over 95% and enantioselectivities
of 92% and 93% ee, respectively (10 bar H2, 50 °C, S/C ¼ 250). At pilot
plant scale, optimization of reaction conditions allowed to increase the
S/C ratio up to 750 under 8 bar H2 and 35 °C with conversion values in
the 97–99% range and 94–97% ee. These results enabled the synthesis of
the hydrogenated product at a manufacturing scale (up to 900 kg).
Another relevant application of the asymmetric hydrogenation of
tetrasubstituted enamides, described by the group of X. Zhang, regards
the reduction of 2-acetoxy-3-acetamido acrylates 36 (Scheme 15) (31).
This reaction has a great synthetic potential due to the importance of
α-hydroxy-β-amino acids in the synthesis of biologically active compounds.
Using β-phenyl acetate as a representative substrate (R ¼ Ph, R’ ¼ Me,
R" ¼ Et), the examination of several catalysts based on chiral diphoshines
(30 atm H2, DCM, S/C ¼ 20, room temperature, 24 h) pointed to catalyst
containing DuanPhos ligand (L4) as the most effective one (full conversion,
97% ee), while Tangphos (L3) one displayed a similar catalyst activity
although a significantly lower enantioselectivity (69% ee). Worth to note,
Me-Duphos catalyst, which provided satisfactory results in the case of other
tetrasubstituted olefins (32), displayed a rather poor reactivity in the case of
the representative substrate. Using the Duanphos catalyst a great influence
of the solvent was observed both in rate and selectivity. For instance, while
full conversion was observed in TFE, the enantioselectivity dropped signifi-
cantly down to 89% ee. In alternative alcohols such as MeOH, EtOH or IPA
enantiomeric excess values are higher (90%, 93% and 97% ee, respectively)
while conversion is considerably lower (34%, 27% and 43%, respectively).
Scheme 19 Structure of diene substrates (A). Chiral amides obtained by the selective
asymmetric hydrogenation of conjugated dienes (B–E). Bonds involved in hydrogena-
tions marked in red.
24 Antonio Pizzano
standard conditions led to the reduction of both the enamide olefin bond
and the alkyne, being the latter hydrogenated to the cis alkene. In the second,
the hydrogenation only reduced the endocyclic double bond keeping the
E configuration of the exocyclic olefin.
Another chemoselective reaction of interest corresponds to the hydro-
genation of β-ketoenamides 48 (Scheme 20) (40). For a representative sub-
strate (R1 ¼ Ph, R2 ¼ Me), an easy hydrogenation was observed using the
Rh catalyst bearing the ZhangPhos ligand (L13) finishing a reaction with
96% ee in 0.5 h under very mild reaction conditions in MeOH (1 atm
H2, rt., 0.5 mol% cat.). In contrast, a much lower reactivity was observed
in aprotic solvents (e.g. 64% conversion in DCM and less than 5% in tolu-
ene). Under the optimal reaction conditions several keto-enamides bearing
different aryl substituents were reduced with high enantioselectivities
(93–99% ee). Worth to note, the methyl derivative also provided satisfactory
results (99% ee). As expected, the presence of a keto carbonyl group in prod-
ucts 49 open interesting routes to further transformation like reduction to
give corresponding amino alcohol derivatives or deoxygenation to provide
the corresponding γ-substituted amino derivatives.
Mechanistic studies. The mechanism of the enantioselective hydrogena-
tion of enamides by Rh catalysts is a topic investigated in great detail in
the literature. Although previous computational, spectroscopic and kinetic
studies have already accumulated a rather good knowledge of the reaction,
this transformation still keeps a considerable interest, particularly in connec-
tion with the improvements in computational methods, which provide a
deeper insight in the critical interactions in mechanistic steps. As well, valu-
able mechanistic information of the reduction of substrates other than model
enamides has also been reported.
A key aspect in the mechanism of the hydrogenation of enamides regards
the order of substrate coordination and hydrogen activation steps. In this
regard, different mechanistic proposals to reach key dihydrides containing
the coordinated substrate have been postulated (Fig. 2). Using catalyst based
on highly donor rigid BenzP* diphosphine (L6b), Gridnev and Imamoto
have studied this aspect in detail as part of the mechanism of asymmetric
hydrogenation of MAC enamide. Worth to note, hydrogenation experi-
ments carried at low temperature complemented with DFT calculations
have shown considerably lower barriers for dihydride and semihydride path-
ways than for the classical unsaturated one.
On the other hand, an exhaustive computational and experimental study
about the mechanism of the hydrogenation of β-dehydroaminoacids 50 by
Asymmetric hydrogenation of functionalized olefins 27
at low temperatures, this enantioreversal has been related with the decrease on
enantioselectivity observed in hydrogenations performed at low temperatures.
Gridnev and Imamoto have also studied in detail the mechanism of
the asymmetric hydrogenation of N-(1-phenylvinyl)acetamide (51) with
[Rh(COD)L6b]SbF6 (Fig. 3) (42). Compound [Rh(L6b)(51)]+ exist in
solution as a mixture of two isomers differing in the olefin face coordinated,
with the pro-(S) diastereomer being the most stable as well as the more reac-
tive towards hydrogen. However, the catalytic hydrogenation of 51 with the
catalyst based on L6b provides the R product as the major enantiomer. To
explain this remarkable observation, authors have provided a detailed mech-
anistic investigation from which it was found a key step corresponding to ole-
fin decoordination in [RhH2(L6b)(pro-(S)-51)]+, being the latter dihydride
generated by hydrogen oxidative addition to [Rh(L6b)(pro-(S)-51)]+.
Thus, reaction enantioselectivity is controlled in the olefin re-coordination
step (i.e. after the hydrogen oxidative addition), since hydride migration is
extremely facile in the octahedral dihydrides resulting after olefin re-
coordination. Worth to note, finally, this mechanistic proposal shows a very
good agreement with the experimental enantioselectivity (Fig. 4).
Gridnev, Gladiali and coworkers have studied the mechanism of the
hydrogenation of MAC by Rh catalysts bearing monodentate phosphines
(43). Spectroscopic studies show the formation of complex [Rh(MAC)
P2]+ (P ¼ L15, Fig. 5) in solution as a mixture of two diastereomers differing
in olefin face coordination in a 4:1 (re/si ¼ 4:1) ratio, both displaying a
cis arrangement of phosphine ligands. On the other hand, generation of
solvent dihydrides in CD2Cl2/THF-D8 led to the formation of cis,trans-
[Rh(H)2(P)2(S)2]+ (S: solvent), more stable than the cis,cis isomers typically
observed in the case of chelating diphosphines (Fig. 5A). Worth to note,
217. Pardon.
Back to puzzle
253. Because a hen lays only one egg a day, and a ship lays to.
Back to puzzle
268. A river.
Back to puzzle
270. Because it keeps its hands before its face; and, though full
of good works, it is wholly unconscious of them, and always running
itself down.
Back to puzzle
272. Monosyllable.
Back to puzzle
273. A bed.
Back to puzzle
274. (P)shaw!
Back to puzzle
275. The sons raise meat there. (The sun’s rays meet there.)
Back to puzzle
276. Innocence Abroad, by Mark Twain (In no sense, a broad).
Back to puzzle
277. Facetiously.
Back to puzzle
279. Bug-bear.
Back to puzzle
282. Clio.
Back to puzzle
285. Arrow-head.
Back to puzzle
286.
A man of deceit
Can best counterfeit;
So, as everything goes,
He can best count ’er toes.
Back to puzzle
288. A kiss.
Back to puzzle
290. Dotage.
Back to puzzle
291. Seaward.
Back to puzzle
292. Mimic.
Back to puzzle
293. Disgraceful.
Back to puzzle
294. The first made musical instruments; the second was a
baggage-man; the third was employed in a gas-factory; and the
fourth made candles.
Back to puzzle
295. Cod.
Back to puzzle
297. Cowslip.
Back to puzzle
298. Love.
Back to puzzle
302. Pearlash.
Back to puzzle
LION
INTO
304.
OTTO
NOON.
Back to puzzle
305. A cock.
Back to puzzle
306. Enigma.
Back to puzzle
311. BLIND.
Back to puzzle
312. Young, Gay, Hood, Lamb, Field, Gray, Fox, Hunt, Horne,
Lingard, Wordsworth, Steele.
Back to puzzle
314. Aërial.
Back to puzzle
316. Fire-fly.
Back to puzzle
318. Walnut.
Back to puzzle
319. Pea-nut.
Back to puzzle
320. Butternut.
Back to puzzle
321. Beechnut.
Back to puzzle
322. Chestnut.
Back to puzzle
323. Cocoanut.
Back to puzzle
326. Spinach.
Back to puzzle
331. Heart-ache.
Back to puzzle
332. Cashmere.
Back to puzzle
333. Season.
Back to puzzle
334. A drum.
Back to puzzle
342. I, ire.
Back to puzzle
346. The 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 12th, 16th, 18th, 19th, 22nd, 23rd,
24th, 26th, 27th, 30th, in the circle, were Jews.
Back to puzzle
348.
Back to puzzle
353. (1) D-ranged; (2) C-girt; (3) D-lighted; (4) N-hammered; (5)
D-tested; (6) R-gone-out: (7) G-owed; (8) K-dense; (9) O-void; (10)
S-pied; (11) B-held; (12) C-bored; (13) X-pensive; (14) D-famed.
St. Nicholas.
Back to puzzle
356. Lily.
Back to puzzle
359. Tissue.
Back to puzzle
366. Fill the blanks with plover, lover, over, ver; glowing, lowing,
owing, wing.
Back to puzzle
371. Dogmatic.
Back to puzzle
372. Cambyses.
Back to puzzle
373. About 117.7 feet. (Find the radius of a circle whose area is
43,560 square feet.).— Prof. Eaton, of Packer Institute.
Back to puzzle
374. Informal.
Back to puzzle
x = a - (b + c).
Example: Let the total lime be 88 per cent.
CaO as carbonate, 2 “ “
CaO as oxid, 78 “ “
Then the CaO as hydrate = 88 - (2 + 78) = 8 per cent. The total
lime as oxid and hydroxid may also be separated from that present
as carbonate by solution in sugar.[242] One gram of calcium oxid is
completely soluble in 150 cubic centimeters of a ten per cent
sucrose solution. Magnesia, iron and alumina do not interfere with
the determinations.
284. Gypsum or Land Plaster.—This substance is highly prized
as a top dressing for grass and for admixture with stall manure for
the purpose of fixing ammonia. Its value in both cases depends upon
its percentage of hydrated calcium sulfate. The quantity of gypsum
mined in the United States in 1893 was a little over 250,000 tons. Of
this amount only about 50,000 tons were used as fertilizer.[243] In the
same time there were imported into the United States, in round
numbers, 170,000 tons. If the same proportionate part of this were
used for fertilizing purposes, it may be said that the annual
consumption of land plaster in the United States at the present time
for agricultural uses is about 75,000 tons.
Gypsum, being a very soft mineral, is easily ground and should
be in the state of a fine powder when used for fertilizing purposes. It
is soluble in about 500 parts of rain water, so that when applied as a
top dressing it is carried into the soil by rain. Its favorable action is
both as a plant food and mechanically in modifying, in an
advantageous way, the physical constituents of the soil. It is also
valuable for composting and for use in stables by reason of its power
of fixing ammonia by the formation of lime carbonate and ammonium
sulfate: