Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Báo Cáo NCKH 2024 1
Báo Cáo NCKH 2024 1
Báo Cáo NCKH 2024 1
Abstract: Due to the development of technology, AI tools have become increasingly popular,
and it has supported people in many tasks in our lives. One of the most well-known AI tools
these days is ChatGPT. ChatGPT can be an assistant in many aspects including education.
Acknowledging that fact, this study examines the use of ChatGPT 3.5 in improving lexical
diversity and lexical sophistication, and people’s perceptions about this application. Through
the mixed-method design by using quasi-experimental and the semi-structured interview,
ChatGPT 3.5 was identified to have positive impact on people’s learning vocabulary. In
addition, the research showed that users had good opinion about the application of ChatGPT
3.5 on learning. The paper concludes that ChatGPT 3.5 can be a potential tool in improving
users’ vocabulary usage in term of diversity and difficulty, and it should be researched more.
The study contributes a wider understanding of the utilization of ChatGPT 3.5 in learning
English.
I. INTRODUCTION
In the current context, the development of technology during Industry 4.0 has led to the
appearance of many contemporary devices that support people in many aspects. One of the
most remarkable achievements of modern times is the invention of Artificial Intelligence (AI).
Some of the prime examples of AI applications are self-driving automation and robotics, and
one of the most well-known ones is ChatGPT. Chat GPT allows users to solve many required
tasks through cutting-edge text-based conversations. In education, it can be a tool to answer
students' questions or brainstorm ideas. However, it can be more than a search tool; it can
serve as a partner in any topic discussion. Acknowledged its potential, we believe ChatGPT
can support students in learning foreign languages, especially in writing skills. This article
will focus on the efficiency of ChatGPT on lexical resources in the writing proficiency of
English non-majored freshmen at Hanoi University of Science and Technology.
2. RESEARCH QUESTIONS
The two most common ways of linguistic learning are through dictionaries and teachers.
However, these methods still have some weaknesses. With dictionaries, the ability to provide
answers to learners’ follow-up questions is limited. Teachers, on the other hand, cannot
answer students’ inquiries at any time of the day. Yet, these are the strengths of Chat GPT.
Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine ChatGPT – a new path for enhancing
student’s English writing vocabulary.
The following research questions are proposed to provide direct evidence in the research:
Have students’ lexical diversity and sophistication aspects in writing improved after
using ChatGPT 3.5 ?
What are students’ perceptions about ChatGPT 3.5 in improving their lexicon?
1. INTRODUCTION
This literature review is aimed at analyzing theoretical background and existing studies in
correlation to ChaGPT and lexical resources, as well as the utility of ChatGPT in the lexical
range, writing proficiency, in English learning and in learning in general. Besides, we also
give theories related to lexical resources and its role in improving writing skills. There were a
wide reservoir of research on ChatGPT, especially the use of ChatGPT on writing proficiency
as a lexical enhancement tool; however, this literature review mainly concentrates on:
In 2022, OpenAI established an application called ChatGPT, in which users can direct the
conversation in terms of length, format, style, level of detail, and language that they expected.
This invention was considered a “significant milestone in the field of artificial intelligence
and language technology” (Ptasznik et al., n.d.). ChatGPT is able to be utilized in a profusion
of activities such as natural language processing, text generation, and language translation,
according to Biswas (2023). Ptasznik et al. (n.d.) stated that not only was the birth of this
language model a technological event; but also it signified a paradigm change in how
computer tools and human language interact with each other, in which English made up the
majority of GPT’s training data.
It is undeniable that the key features of ChatGPT is one of the great contributors to the
popularity of ChatGPT. Ray (2023) analyzed the key features of ChatGPT into 7 seven
aspects:
The use of ChatGPT in English writing education has been explored in a certain number of
studies. An analysis which was carried out by Abdalkader (2022) concluded that it is evident
that the utility of AI, particularly ChatGPT, helped to improve English proficiency generally
and each of the components of writing skills. He also stated that by involving learners in an
exciting and practical learning setting, it has promoted its efficacy in boosting their learning
process and understanding the value of English in everyday life. Additionally, according to
Baskara (2023), some of the challenges when giving EFL writing’s individualized comments
would be able to be assuaged by using ChatGPT, which can provide learners with real-time
feedback and assistance.
Lexical diversity is often treated as synonymous with lexical richness, as exemplified by the
work Jarvis (2013) and Chen (2022). They contend, echoing the sentiments of Read (2000),
that while lexical diversity is indeed important, it represents merely one facet within the
broader concept of lexical richness.
Several quantitative measures have been proposed to assess lexical diversity. Among the most
commonly used are type-token ratio (TTR), which calculates the ratio of unique words (types)
to the total number of words (tokens) in a text (Silverman & Newhoff, 2003). Other measures
include MTLD (Measure of Textual Lexical Diversity) and D (D), which provide more
nuanced assessments by considering factors such as word length and contextual diversity
(McCarthy & Jarvis, 2010).
At its core, lexical sophistication encompasses the adept utilization of intricate and
nuanced vocabulary. Though still in debate, it denotes the ability to employ words that
convey precise meanings and shades of expression, reflecting a high level of linguistic
competence (Biber & Conrad, 2009). According to Read (2000), lexical sophistication
is operationalized as "the proportion of relatively unusual or advanced words in the
learner’s text" (p. 203). Various metrics have been proposed to quantify lexical
sophistication, each capturing distinct dimensions of vocabulary complexity like
Advanced Guiraud (AG) However, Daller et al. (2013) have proven that this measure
does not always reflect development.
Advancements in technology have led to the development of various tools and resources
designed to enhance lexico in language learning and writing. Lexical analysis tools, such as
corpora and concordancers, enable learners and researchers to explore lexical patterns,
collocations, and usage in authentic language data (Kennedy & Miceli, 2001). Vocabulary
learning apps and software platforms offer interactive exercises, flashcards, and games to
facilitate vocabulary acquisition and retention (Nation, 2001). Additionally, writing
enhancement tools, such as grammar and spell checkers, synonym suggesters, and readability
analyzers, assist writers in improving lexical accuracy, clarity, and coherence in their texts
(Attali & Burstein, 2006). The development and utilization of enhancement lexico tools hold
great potential for supporting language learners and writers in enhancing their lexico skills
and proficiency levels.
4. CORRELATION STUDIES.
The effects of using ChatGPT as a tool to support English writing skills have been examined
on a large scale via several works by academic researchers. A research by Yaqi Wu (2023)
highlighted the impact of ChatGPT and other AI tools on writing skills of English major
students in English for Academic Purpose writing classroom. The study used mixed-method
design, integrating literature review, empirical research, and theoretical discussion (Wu,
2023). The researcher concluded that AI tools like ChatGPT can support students immediately
in writing skills by enhancing the writing quality in terms of lexical, grammar and expression
(Wu, 2023). Additionally, ChatGPT can create writing based on the information that users
give (Wu, 2023). One of the most significant features of ChatGPT is it can be a personalized
learning instrument which generates answers as close to the user's needs as possible (Wu,
2023). Not only in studying but also in teaching, ChatGPT is believed to help teachers in
meeting students' needs (Wu, 2023). The limitations of ChatGPT and other AI tools are also
mentioned in the research, such as the lack of ability in dealing with complex academic
writing in specialized fields (Wu, 2023). Furthermore, it can restrict students' creativity, their
style and expression (Wu, 2023). The research also showed the potential of applying AI in
learning language and instructing writing (Wu, 2023).
Besides, not only did researchers study the correlation between ChatGPT and English writing
skills, but they also compared the use of ChatGPT and learners’ dictionaries. An analysis
carried out by Lew & Poznan (n.d) stated the comparison between dictionaries and ChatGPT
in solving lexical tasks. The research used quantitative research methods with clear literature
review, empirical research, as well as the discussion for the general theories. They claimed
that ChatGPT is more effective than dictionaries in dealing with tasks related to lexico. In
addition, the researchers also discussed some benefits of using ChatGPT in enhancing lexico,
and one of the noticeable ones is that it can give lexical resources related to the context
instantly, thanks to its ability to converse with students through chatbox. However, limitations
were also referred to in this study. They indicated that ChatGPT could only be accessible
through an app on mobile phones throughout the data collecting period.
In conclusion, the studies above illustrated the application of ChatGPT on English writing
skills and on dealing with lexical assignments. They both stated their methods of research,
literature review with clear-cut evidence, as well as mentioned the advantages and
disadvantages of ChatGPT when applying this invention as a tool to enhance writing skills
and lexical resources. However, these studies did not have deep insights into the correlation of
ChatGPT and lexical resources, as well as the usage of this application as a lexical
enhancement implement on writing skills, yet in our study we will thoroughly examined the
relationship between two subjects and investigated the utilization upon English writing skills
as a role of a lexical improvement tool.
III. METHODOLOGY
1. INTRODUCTION
Our study aimed to investigate whether the utilization of ChatGPT enhance lexical diversity
and lexical sophistication in students’ writing. The researchers applied a mixed-method
approach which use both quantitative and qualitative analysis. By using this approach, the
researchers were able to see students’ improvement and their perceptions of using ChatGPT in
learning vocabulary.
2. RESEARCH AIMS
The study embarked to analyze the impact of ChatGPT on lexical diversity and lexical
sophistication in students’ writing and their opinion about this method of English non-
majored freshman at Hanoi University of Science and Technology.
To accomplish the aim, the researchers presented a small number of research questions:
Have students’ lexical diversity and sophistication aspects in writing improved after
using ChatGPT 3.5 ?
What are students’ perceptions about ChatGPT 3.5 in improving their lexicon?
The researchers agreed to utilize mix-method that incorporates with quantitative and
quantitative approaches since it was believed to cover the benefits of both approaches. The
researchers applied quantitative design since we want to evaluate whether the utilization of
ChatGPT can improve students’ lexical diversity and lexical sophistication, and the most
precise way to see the phenomenon is through statistics, the calculation. It was defined that
“Quantitative research methods dealing with numbers and anything that are measurable in a
systematic way of investigation of phenomena and their relationships.” (Mohajan, 2020).
Therefore, with the result of the test, we can analyze whether students improved and see the
impact of ChatGPT 3.5 in a systematic way. The qualitative design was used to find out
students’ perception and opinions to the ChatGPT application that answers to the second
research question. We would like to interpret the phenomena in terms of the meanings to
them, and to enhance the validity of the findings. The qualitative analysis offers what the
researchers need when it can convey the context and deeper understanding, and it is essential
to take as much data as possible to explain what we are investigating (Malina et al., 2010).
This approach is believed to offer a breadth and depth understanding of the findings (Almalki,
2016 as cited in Jofnson et al., 2007).
However, some disadvantages of mixed method approach still cannot be removed. Firstly, it
takes more time for collecting analysing data (Denscombe, 2010). Marking the tests was done
rapidly; however, it was complicated to analyse participants’ opinions. The problem was
addressed by planning the timeline carefully and assigning tasks between researchers suitably.
To collect quantitative data, the team decided to conduct quasi-experimental strategy which
an experimental group and a control group were taught to study writing and vocabulary
through some topics by using ChatGPT and traditional method respectively. It is defined that
the quasi-experimental design is used to evaluate the impact of interventions and to illustrate
the causality between the interference and the outcome with the measurement of
preintervention and postintervention (Harris et al., 2006). The researchers applied quasi-
experimental design to assess the impact of ChatGPT on first-year students English
vocabulary in term of lexical sophistication and lexical diversity. The quasi-experimental
design also involves comparing groups that closely matches the experimental group in term of
pre-intervention characteristics (Courtney & Wulczyn, 2021). The participants were asked to
accomplish the pre-test and post-test to see whether they showed improvement especially
when using ChatGPT, and how they improved comparing to the control class. The students
were asked to do the pre-test so that the researchers could assign them into two classes to
maintain the equal capacity. However, some of the challenges have not been removed. The
non-randomization division was considered as a problem of the method since the selection
bias might exist (Harris et al., 2006). The bias selection might lead to the difference of some
important characteristics that could affect the outcome of the study (Harris et al., 2006). In
addition, the application of post-test and pre-test might make students put effort only into the
final test. Therefore, to ensure the validity and make students more focusing on the lesson, the
mini test were used throughout the eight lessons of the course.
With qualitative data, we applied semi-structured interview for experimental group to get
students’ in-depth insight and perception about the application of ChatGPT in learning
vocabulary. Semi-structured interview was used due to its flexibility for small-scale research
(Pathal & Intratai, 2012 as cited in Drever, 1995). We would like to get as various and deepest
insight as possible, therefore semi-structured interviews was applied because it offers a more
open framework when we could ask additional questions based on participants’ answers. In
addition, we wanted to verify the students’ answers to certain that we understood their answer
correctly and give the correct evaluation during the analysis process.
The pre-test and post-test were used to evaluate students’ lexical diversity and lexical
sophistication. In addition, the pre-test was conducted to assign students to experimental class
and control class that were similar in English vocabulary level. The test format was IELTS
Writing Task 2, and the students needed to write at least 250 words in 40 minutes. The tests
were chose from Cambridge Practice Tests for IELTS 18 test 3 and on the website IELTS
Online Test.com The topic of the test were different, but the questions were the same. Both
the test were done at Ta Quang Buu Library, and students were supervised by the researchers
to avoid cheating.
4.1.2. Mini test
During eight lessons, eight mini test were used to practice writing and using vocabulary
learned in that lesson. The results of the test were also used for evaluating students’
vocabulary after each lesson. The mini test required students to write a paragraph about 100-
150 words answering a question that related to the topic in that lesson in 30 minutes. The
questions were IELTS questions from various sources such as the Internet, Cambridge
Practice Tests for IELTS and IELTS Advantage Writing Skills.
In the final stage of data collection, five participants in the experimental group were
interviewed to share their perceptions and opinions about using ChatGPT as a learning tool.
The interviews were conducted one on one right after the post-test. The researchers agreed to
use the mother tongue to interview since we wanted to get the deepest students’ insights, and
there would be no limitation for them to express their opinions. The questionnaire was
designed based on a list of questions from a research named “Applying ChatGPT to tackle the
side effects of personal learning environments from learner and learning perspective: An
interview of experts in higher education” (Xu et al., 2024) . It was divided into 4 parts to
explore different aspects which are the frequency, the benefits, the challenges and the
willingness of using ChatGPT in learning English and English vocabulary. The question lists
had 9 default questions including open-ended questions and rating questions. With rating
questions, students were asked to rate the level of agreement from 1 to 5 to a statement that
the researcher gave. The open-ended questions were to see students’ perceptions and
awareness about the application of ChatGPT. The interviewers wer allowed to ask extra
questions based on participants answers to make sure that they understand correctly and to get
more information.
5. PARTICIPANTS
The participants were English non-majored first year students in Hanoi University of Science
and Technology. We recruited 10 students from various major and their English level
diverse.Therefore, we prepared a pre-test to evaluate their capacity and assign them into
classes. Based on the pre- test. Regarding to their English level, we tried to divide them into
two classes which are equal in the amount and ability. However, during the course, two
students quit due to personal reason. One class would learn writing and vocabulary by
traditional method (control group) while the other one would adopt knowledge with the help
of ChatGPT (experimental group).
6. MATERIALS DESIGNED FOR TEACHING
6.1. Lesson plans
The lesson plans were developed by the researcher based on the lesson plans from British
Council. The team chose lesson plans from British Council since their topic were variety and
they have lesson content for every English level and age. The researchers chose the
appropriate content regarded to the students’ level and their age. We adapted British
Council’s lesson activities and cooperated with our additional vocabulary part. The useful
vocabulary part was developed based on Destination B2 by Malcolm Mann and Steve Taylore
Knowles, published by Macmillan Publishers and English Vocabulary in Use – Pre
Intermediate & Intermediate fourth edition, published by Cambridge University Press. The
experimental classes were conducted in 8 lessons, each lesson lasted for 90 minutes per class.
In more detail, the lesson plan for experimental class had 4 main parts (1) the lead-in/ warm
up, (2) learning through topic, (3) the useful vocabulary, (4) the mini test. ChatGPT was used
throughout the lesson, except the mini test part.
After the first lesson, the researchers realized a problem in lesson plan that the plan was too
general and there was a lack of vocabulary related to the topic. The researchers decided to
modify the lesson activities and add a part named the useful language to expand students'
vocabulary usage and to correlate to the research aim which focuses on lexical diversity and
lexical sophistication.
The treatment period lasted for three weeks with eight lessons, one pre-test, one post-test, and
an interview. The students were assigned to the class regarded to their result in the pre-test.
Each lesson lasted one hour and a half via MS Teams from 8:30 to 10:00 pm, and the lessons
were recorded for absent students watch again. Three researchers took turn to swap the role to
guide the students to determine that the improvement of students were due to the lesson plans
yet the instructors. After eight lessons, there was a post-test for both classes and an interview
for experimental class
7. DATA ANALYSIS
7.1. Quantitative data analysis
7.1.1. Measure of Textual Lexical Diversity (MTLD)
MTLD has been mentioned as one of the most powerful measure to evaluate lexical diversity.
It was recommended by McCarthy and Javis (2010) due to its accuracy. Type-token ratio
(TTR) by Templin (1957) was the oldest and the most basic formula in calculating the word
frequency; however, it had problems with the text length (Šišková, 2012). When compare two
texts, it needs to be in the equal or similar length to show the most accurate result (Šišková,
2012). Voc-D, Mass are some of the most popular index to analyze the lexical richness still
face the issue with text length and the text structure (Šišková, 2012). However, MTLD was
developed to address the issue. MTLD can preserve the text structure and examining the text
sequentially (Šišková, 2012). “ MTLD cuts the text into sequences which have the same TTR
(set to 0.72, for its rationale see McCarthy 2005) and calculates the mean length of the
sequences which have the given TTR” (Šišková, 2012). The number 0.72 was researched to
be the point of stabilization and it is important in this index since “ it is at this point that
neither the introduction of repeated types nor even a considerable string of new types can
markedly affect the TTR trajectory” (Mccarthy & Jarvis, 2010). It is demonstrated that
MTLD does not depend on the text length in the 100-2000 words range (Šišková, 2012).
This is suitable for our research when during the pre-test and post-test, some students’ exam
had the difference in text length which can be partly address by MTLD. We use a tool named
Text Inspector to support us analyze the lexical diversity. The tool was developed by a
Professor Applied Linguistics, Stephen Bax, and it is supported by the Centre of Research in
English Language Learning and Assessment (CRELLA) at the University of Bedforshire. It
won an award from British Council in 2017 (Text Inspector, 2022)
The researchers agreed to use thematic analysis to scrutinize the qualitative data due to some
reasons. Firstly, it is more simple to apply since it does not require theory to analyze, and the
documents about this method is quite accessible to less experienced researchers. (Kiger &
Varpio, 2020 as cited in King, 200). In addition, it allows researchers to summarize, highlight
the key information that they need (Kiger & Varpio, 2020). Finally, the thematic analysis
offers flexibility in terms of the type of questions it can address, the types and volume of data
(Kiger & Varpio, 2020).
The procedure was taken in manual. Firstly, we transcribed the audio data to the text data
manually, read the texts carefully, highlight and take notes some potential data. Next, we
generated the initial codes by identifying and labeling the meaningful segments of data with
descriptive code. Then we connected the relating codes to create theme by using the map to
see the relation between the codes. Finally, we defined and named the themes with creating a
narrative description.
IV. RESULT
1. Quantitative analysis
1.1. Lexical sophistication
1.1.1. Pre-test. Post-test
The bar chart above illustrates how lexical difficulty criterion of control class across 3
students named A, B and C has improved throughout the experimental course. Each students’
result is divided into two phases: pre-test and post-test. The evaluation of the students is also
divided in 6 levels: A1, A2, B1, B2, C1, and Unclassified level.
Overall, it is noteworthy that the figure for A1 level of words in both pre-test and post-test of
the three students was highest among all levels from A1 to C1, which can be considered that
students initially had a basic understanding of the lexicon. In addition, the most noticeable
change can be seen in the figure for C1 level and Unclassified, which was the lowest.
In the pre-test phase, it can be witnessed that the figures for the B1, B2, C1 levels were
approximately 10% to 15%, which can be considered as one of the lowest. After 8 lessons,
this figure for the score for each level gradually decreased, compared to that of A1 level,
which witnessed a slight increase. It can be recognized that the lexical difficulty of these three
students in control class still remained the same.
In the figure given, we can see that the figure for academic words in level B1, B2, C1,
unclassified in the experimental class fluctuated and had the trend of rising.
Overall, we can see in the line graph that the figure for the B1, B2, C1 and unclassified in the
experimental class had the upward trend over that of the control class. Hence, it can be
considered that students of experimental class, also called ChatGPT class, improved gradually
throughout 8 mini test during the class.
1.1.2. Mini test
Overall, we can see from the graph that the number of A1-level words of the control class was
higher than that of the experimental class. However, the figure for A2, B1, B2, C1, and
unclassified levels of the experimental class can be witnessed as higher than that of the
control class. Therefore, it can be understandable that there was a marginal improvement in
the lexical sophistication of the experimental class, also known as ChatGPT class, throughout
8 lessons of mini tests.
Pre-test Post-test
Overall, the control class showed the improvement in MTLD score which meant their lexical
diversity enhanced. Students’ results increased about 20 points and the C student showed the
greatest enhancement by about 26 points. The highest score from both the pre-test and post-
test belonged to student C and there was no significant change in the students’ rank. The
length of the text of student B and C in pre-test and post-test did not have a big gap; however,
student’s A pre-test was much shorter than his post-test.
40
20
0
D E F G H
Pre-test Post-test
The experimental class demonstrated good results when all students’ MTLD point increased.
The score improvement was varied between the students.. There was a significant change in
H’s score when it rose by about 42 points, and he became the students got the highest score in
the post-test. Student D also illustrated great improvement from 59.79 to 92.58, raising by
nearly 33 points. The score of the other two students F and G grew moderately by 23 points.
Students E showed the least enhancement with nearly 11 points gap between two tests.
Overall, the increase in MTLD index could evidence that the utilization of ChatGPT 3.5 could
raise the lexical diversity, and some of the participants’ results indicated the greater
betterment compared to control class.
A B C
The students’ result from the Control class is variety when each student showed different
performance during the process of studying. Student B illustrated enhancement gradually
during the first five lessons and the score peaked the top in lesson 7 with the score 117.66.
Although the score in the last lesson decreased, it was higher than his first lesson. However,
student C result showed the downward trend although he had a slight improvement after the
course. His score increased significantly to just above 91 points in the second lesson then it
decreased. Despite the fall, his score in the final lesson was still better than the first one. The
most noticeable one is A’s result when it influctuated throughout eight lessons, and his final
lesson score was the lowest in the course. There was not any big gap in the length between the
his eight paragraphs.
Change of MTLD in mini test
in Experimental class
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
D E F G H
Most of students’ results showed the improvement in the middle of the course, then changed
in the last lessons of the course. Student D and G had the growth in the majority of the
lessons; student F during the middle of the course enhanced the score, and students E and H
results fluctuated. Most of the participants’ showed the greatest improvement in lesson six
and student E got the highest score at nearly 155 which was also the highest result of the class
throughout the lessons. Students E although had noticeable plunge, yet he got amazing
improvement in the middle of the course. Student G illustrated development in the middle of
the course and his highest score was just above 116. Student D, F and H shared the same
similarity, but D and F result a increase in the last lesson after the plunge while H observed
the reduce.
100.00
80.00
60.00
40.00
20.00
0.00
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
The chart demonstrates the comparison in average score in the mini tests of two classes.
Experimental class got higher score than control class in most of the lessons. In lesson six,
ChatGPT class got remarkably higher score (111.99) than traditional class, and this was the
highest mark that two classes could achieve. The gap between two classes in the first two
lessons were also high with 14.6 and 26.9 respectively. Conventional class only got higher
much higher score than experimental class in lesson four with just above 22 score; the other
lessons had the small difference between classes. Therefore, it could be understood that
students in experimental group performed better, and it could be inferred that the application
of ChatGPT was initially successful.
2. QUALITATIVE
2.1. The Perceptions of Students in Experimental Class.
When I asked the class how often they used ChatGPT to study English in general and English
vocabulary in particular prior to the experimental class, five out of five students, which made
up 100%, said they had never used it for that reason.While the majority of them provided
straightforward responses on the frequency of using it (they had never used it for English
learning purposes, as well as not for any purposes), student G elaborated that she uses it for
other things, such as resolving math problems and other life issues, and how frequently she
does so. In detail, she answered
“Before, I would often use it to find information related to mathematics and life issues.
Usually, I would just ask questions as if I were chatting with a friend. I use it 2-3 times a
week, and each time won't take much time, only about 5-10 minutes each.”
Additionally, student H responded that she has never used ChatGPT to learn English before,
but that she does use it for quick information.
“For other purposes, yes, but for learning English, I have never used it. At first, I just thought
of using a dictionary because it's faster. So, I don't use Chat GPT much, but when I need
quick information, I'll use it because it provides information quickly. Sometimes I need an
idea, but it doesn't always serve my purpose, so I don't use it much afterward.”
When it comes to the evaluation of the overall benefits of ChatGPT in learning vocabulary
when joining the experimental class, 4 out of 5 students, accounting for 80%, agreed that
ChatGPT does support them in learning English vocabulary with simple explanation. It could
be the merits below:
Give ideas, opinions with excellent ways of using words to convey, as well as expose
to new ranges of vocabulary.
Provide synonyms, antonyms and higher-level terms, and answer questions about
vocabulary issues.
Clear definition, translate and offer examples.
Firstly, ChatGPT is able to give ideas and opinions with its excellent way of using words to
convey information. Student E answered in order to make this point more evident: “ChatGPT
is fast in giving topics and ideas. For example, when I ask a problem and it provides me with
a wide range of ideas and opinions in English, and the way it expresses and uses words is
excellent”. Additionally, student F also said: “I find using ChatGPT to learn vocabulary will
support me in exposing more new words, so that my lexical range will be extended.” It can be
transcribed that not only does ChatGPT provide users with immediate topics and ideas,
but also conveys them in an excellent expression with quality words, so that users would be
able to broaden new ranges of lexicon.
Secondly, ChatGPT is capable of providing synonyms, antonyms and higher-level terms, as
well as answering questions about vocabulary issues. This point was answered by 3 out 5
students, accounting for 60%. They assumed that they had gained support from Chat GPT in
learning more vocabulary through questions about finding synonyms, antonyms, and also by
answering many questions about vocabulary issues. To make this point clearer, student H also
responded in detail her answer:
"So, first of all, with vocabulary, normally when I look up words in a dictionary, some may
not have many synonyms or antonyms. That means there might not be many or none at all.
When I look them up using Chat GPT, there are a lot more synonyms available, and as you
assessed, even higher-level terms, so I can learn more new words. That's the first point. The
basic point is that I find it, it sort of gives me what I call 'enlightenment'. I can interact with
Chat GPT, like having a conversation, and I can learn many things, sort of like exchanging
ideas. I can also look up a lot of information I need for my writing, or ideas for my articles.
Or, in learning English, there's this thing where you get ideas for when you're in an interview,
like Chat GPT could ask you some questions during the interview. I find it surprising that you
can have a back-and-forth conversation with Chat GPT. It responds like I'm talking to
someone."
In addition, ChatGPT was also commented to have clear definition, the ability to translate,
and offer examples. It was agreed by 2 out of 5 students, making up 40%. They said that “it
can provide vocabulary explanations, clear definitions of terms, translate into various
languages for better understanding, and offer examples”.
The use of ChatGPT in improving lexical diversity and lexical sophistication nevertheless still
has several inevitable challenges.
First of all, according to student E, he thinks he needs more questions to reach his ultimate
answers and somehow it is not faster and more convenient than a dictionary. In detail, he said,
“Because I think using a dictionary is somehow faster and more convenient than using
ChatGPT. As a dictionary can give examples, Vietnamese meaning and English meaning
description at the same time. When I use ChatGPT, I need to use 3 to 4 questions so that it
can answer my question completely.”
Additionally, there were concerns about language barriers. In other words, they did not
know the prompt to ask ChatGPT. 2 out of 5 students had the same point of view that they
could not find out the words and the phrases to converse with ChatGPT. They said that,
“During the course, I encountered many difficulties in using Chat GPT for vocabulary
because there were many words for which I couldn't figure out the meaning of a question or
phrase to ask Chat GPT. I often forgot the question, and I didn't know which one to use."
Furthermore, there were also opinions that ChatGPT contains academic words that are
difficult to use in everyday communication. Student E explained,
“Although ChatGPT can broaden my lexical range, it almost does not provide me with casual
words use in everyday conversation, as those words are academic so it will be difficult to use
in casual communication.”
When we asked them whether or not they would utilize ChatGPT in learning vocabulary and
in general English learning purposes, 100% of them had the same plan to use ChatGPT. They
also explained the reasons why they will continue to use it in the future, as they can use it in
for their own purposes such as
V. Discussion
The integration of AI technology, particularly Chat GPT, into educational settings has
garnered significant attention in recent years. This discussion delves into a comprehensive
analysis of research findings regarding the effectiveness and perception of integrating Chat
GPT into an experimental classroom setting. Through a meticulous examination of key
findings, connections to previous research, unexpected results, limitations, potential follow-up
studies, and implications, this discussion aims to provide a nuanced understanding of the role
of Chat GPT in modern education especially for non-major student at Hanoi University of
Science and Technology.
To begin with, the research findings highlight a substantial increase in lexical diversity and
complexity among students at experimental class that was used Chat GPT. This finding aligns
with the initial research question, which sought to explore the potential for Chat GPT to
enhance vocabulary skills. The observed improvement in students' language proficiency
suggests that Chat GPT serves as a valuable tool for augmenting vocabulary acquisition in
educational contexts.
Moreover, the overall perception of students towards Chat GPT was predominantly positive,
with a significant majority acknowledging its potential to improve vocabulary at 80%. This
positive reception echoes findings from previous studies by Yilmaz et al. Indicating “had
favorable perceptions of Chat GPT in the educational environment in general” . The
popularity of specific features such as synonym and antonym identification and vocabulary
explanations among students highlights the importance of user-friendly and intuitive
functionalities in driving engagement with AI tools.
Not only understand the benefits of Chat GPT, it is noteworthy that students also
acknowledged the disadvantages of Chat GPT relating to difficult vocabulary, prompts
lacking, and unverified information. This align with Nguyen findings in 2023 showing
student’s agreement that “ChatGPT was unable to examine the quality and reliability of
sources”. However, these higher education students have proposed practical solutions to
address limitations of Chat GPT, such as exploring additional prompts, double-checking
responses, or recording new vocabulary. This proactive engagement underscores the
adaptability of students in leveraging AI technology to optimize their learning experience.
Unexpectedly, significant fluctuations were observed in the performance of the Chat GPT
class towards the end of the study, while the control class maintained a relatively stable
performance. This variability in performance raises questions about the consistency and
reliability of Chat GPT over time. Furthermore, the low usage of Chat GPT for language
learning purposes, despite its significant media coverage, underscores the gap between media
hype and actual adoption of AI technologies in education. Placing these findings in context, it
is essential to consider the specific demographics of the study participants, namely first-year
non-major students at HUST. Previous research by Menon and Shilpa in 2023 has indicated
“social influence” and “Perceived Engagement” as two of the leading factors that impacts the
decision of Chat GPT users in India. Understanding the demographic context helps in
interpreting the research findings within a broader socio-cultural framework.
Potential follow-up studies could explore various aspects of Chat GPT integration, including
its impact on speaking and listening skills, as well as its effectiveness across different
educational levels and disciplines. Future research endeavors should aim to address these
limitations and provide more comprehensive evaluations of Chat GPT's efficacy in
educational settings in larger scale.
In conclusion, the research findings indicate a positive trend towards increased lexical
diversity and favorable perception of Chat GPT among students. This underscores the
promising potential of integrating AI technology into modern education systems to provide
convenience and new learning experiences. However, further research is needed to address
limitations and fully understand the implications of Chat GPT integration in educational
settings. By conducting rigorous research and fostering collaboration between researchers,
educators, and technology developers, we can harness the transformative power of AI to
enrich teaching and learning experiences in the digital age.
VI. Conclusion
To summarize, the study answered the research questions and also the objective of the
research which are whether ChatGPT 3.5 helps students to improve their lexical diversity and
lexical sophistication and also students’ perceptions about this application. The study used
mixed-method design with the combination of quasi-experimental and semi-structured
interview to find the answer for the questions. With qualitative data, the study showed the
improvement of students’ lexical diversity and lexical sophistication and the comparison
between how enhanced they are when applying traditional learning methods and ChatGPT
3.5. The improvements were conducted through various tests including: pre-test, post-test
before and after the course and mini test during the course. With quantitative data, the
researchers found out what students' opinions are about this application. The students’
opinions were varied and valuable to the researcher, giving us an objective view about the use
of ChatGPT 3.5. ChatGPT 3.5 may be convenient to the majority of people; however, it still
poses some challenges during the studying process. The researchers were impressed by what
students evaluated, the benefits, challenges of the application and some suggestions of
solutions to the obstacles they faced. Students’ satisfaction was also illustrated by the
willingness of using ChatGPT 3.5 in the future not only in terms of studying vocabulary
English but also in other aspects.
The research also faced some challenges during the time processing. Firstly, the study was
conducted in a short amount of time and the lack of experience of researchers leading to the
rust in preparing and analyzing. This may lead to the quality of the analysis due to the
mistakes during the time researching. In addition, the lack of time may not be enough for
students to be proficient in using the tool and vocabulary which may lead to the lower
precision of the project. Secondly, the research was small-scale. The project could only recruit
a small number of people at school making it difficult to observe whether the result is true for
various objects. Finally, the online teaching classes made it difficult to manage the validity of
students’ writing.
Further studies are required since there are not many research evaluating deeply the impact of
using ChatGPT on vocabulary learning. Due to the mentioned limited above, the future
research earchs should be conducted in larger scale to see the validity on a range of object and
in longer time to see the proficiency of using ChatGPT and usage vocabulary..
0. Pre-test, post-test
Pre-test
Post-test
0. Mini test
Topic 1
Topic 2
Topic 3
Topic 4
Topic 5
Topic 6
Topic 7
Topic 8
WOMEN IN SCIENCE
Learning outcomes
Aware of the relative lack of women in science and consider why this might be so.
Able to identify the main ideas in a semi academic text.
Understand how reference words are used to link the ideas of a text together.
Age/Level
Time
Materials
Worksheet 1.
Presentation.
Introduction
This lesson will help raise awareness of some of the reasons why women are relatively poorly
represented in science. The lesson begins by challenging some stereotypes and asking
students to consider why there aren’t more women in science. They then read a text which
provides some possible reasons, and discuss how these relate to their own opinions. The
lesson then focuses on reference words, and how they link a text together, before a writing
task about different jobs and gender.
Procedure
Introduction 5
to the course minutes
A father and his son are in a car accident. The father dies
instantly, and the son is
Answers:
3. University
5. Female scientists’
Aware of the relative lack of women in science and consider why this
Lesson 5 mins might be so.
conclusion
WOMEN IN SCIENCE
Learning outcomes
Aware of the relative lack of women in science and consider why this might be so.
Able to identify the main ideas in a semi academic text.
Understand how reference words are used to link the ideas of a text together.
Age/Level
Aged 13-17 and adults (B2-C1).
Time
65 minutes + 30 minutes Writing post-task phase.
Materials
Worksheet 1.
Presentation.
Introduction
This lesson will help raise awareness of some of the reasons why women are relatively poorly
represented in science. The lesson begins by challenging some stereotypes and asking
students to consider why there aren’t more women in science. They then read a text which
provides some possible reasons, and discuss how these relate to their own opinions. The
lesson then focuses on reference words, and how they link a text together, before a writing
task about different jobs and gender.
Note: The presentation can be used for a paper free lesson.
Procedure
Main activity Time Details
period
Introduction 5 *The topic: This lesson will help raise awareness of some of the
to the course minutes reasons why women are relatively poorly represented in science.
The lesson begins by challenging some stereotypes and asking
students to consider why there aren’t more women in science.
They then read a text which provides some possible reasons, and
discuss how these relate to their own opinions. The lesson then
focuses on reference words, and how they link a text together,
before a final writing tasks about different jobs and gender.
* Chat GPT:
Chat GPT is an artificial intelligence technology developed by
OpenAI, based on the GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer)
model. Chat GPT has the ability to understand and generate
natural language text automatically, based on both context and
user input.
Explanation of Chat GPT's First Feature: Information Lists
When prompted with a specific topic or query, Chat GPT sifts
through its vast database of information and compiles key points
into a well-organized list. Each item in the list typically includes
important details, statistics, examples, or other pertinent
information related to the topic at hand.They provide users with a
comprehensive overview of a subject, facilitating deeper
understanding and informed decision-making. Moreover, the lists
are customizable and can be tailored to suit the user's preferences
and specific needs.
"Chat GPT, can you compile an information list on the history of
[topic], including significant events, milestones, and influential
figures?"
A father and his son are in a car accident. The father dies instantly,
and the son is
taken to the nearest hospital for surgery. The surgeon comes in
and exclaims "I can't
operate on this boy."
"Why not?" the nurse asks.
"Because he's my son," the surgeon responds.
How is this possible?
Activity 2 10 • Give out worksheet 1 and ask students to read just the first paragraph
minutes (A) and find 4 facts about women in science with correspond reason.
* Engage Chat GPT to facilitate discussion and provide additional
insights into the statistics and reasons:
- Prompt:
"Could you please provide more detailed information about the
percentage of women in STEM fields in different countries and compare
them with the male percentage? Can Chat GPT explain these
differences?"
"Chat GPT, what do you think are the reasons that may lead to the
underrepresentation of women in science? Please offer opinions or
explanations from an expert perspective."
"I'd like to know more about the specific challenges that women face
when pursuing careers in science. Can Chat GPT list these challenges
and provide additional information about them?"
"Please tell me what '[word]' means in an easy way. And can you
provide an example sentence to show how it's used?"
Activity 3 10 • Ask students to now read the rest of the article (paragraphs B-
minutes E) and identify the main idea in each paragraph. Use Chat GPT
to explain unfamiliar words. They should then compare the
ideas with the ideas they had at the previous stage.
Suggested answers: B: stereotypes that women don’t do
science, or if they do, the emphasis is still on their looks. C:
women undervaluing themselves D bias against women- paid
less and seen as less capable E: difficulties with childcare or
career breaks.
• Then allow students to discuss the content of the article, using
the questions in exercise 4. Depending on the group, this could
be in groups, or whole class.
Activity 4 15 • Ask students to read the grammar box and answer any questions.
minutes Then ask students to look back at the beginning of the article and
discuss what each highlighted word refers to. Use Chat GPT's second
features to explain difficult words.
• Go through the answers. Make sure that students understand that a
reference word can refer back to another specific word or phrase, or to
an idea within the text. NB Only the first 3 references are on the
presentation.
Answers:
1. The proportion of boys studying science at school leaving age.
2. The proportion of boys studying science being much higher than girls.
3. University
4. The fact that scientists in films and TV are usually men.
5. Female scientists’
• Students then work through exercise 7 individually, checking their
answers against
the text. NB Only the first 4 gaps are in the presentation.
Answers: 1 this. 2. their. 3. one. 4. They. 5. their.
Lesson 5 mins Summarizing the Topic and Two Features of Chat GPT
Conclusion Aware of the relative lack of women in science and consider
why this might be so.
Chat GPT's First Feature: Information Lists:
Chat GPT's Second Feature: Vocabulary Explanation:
OPEN CITIES
Topic
Demographic change
Aims
Intermediate +
Time
Materials
Worksheet.
Introduction
This lesson plan explores some of the issues associated with cultural and environmental
adjustments and looks at some of the ways in which these have impacted on the lives of
migrants in different cities and countries. This is a strong underlying theme of the
OPENCities project www.opencities.eu.
Procedure
Main Time Details
activity period
century, write 1900 and then write 20_ _ [depending on the year you
are in].
Answers:
1. a) 2. c) 3. b) 4. c) 5. a)
Listening 10 Listening
minutes
To get students thinking about the theme of the listening, ask
them if they know what magnets and glue do. (Magnets
attract and glue makes things stay in place).
Ask the students if they know what the ‘magnets and glue’
of a city are. Ask them to read the text on Worksheet Task 5
and find out.
Harvard Business Professor Rosabeth Moss Kanter coined two terms to express
this idea: magnets and glue. Magnets are the elements of a city which attract
people and investment. Glue is what keeps people and money in the city, what
convinces people to stay in that city. Both magnets and glue are fundamental if a
NB: If you don’t have access to the audio files or the ability to play them, read or
get students to read the audio scripts out loud in class
• Tell your students that they are going to listen to an expert in population
movement talking about the ‘magnets’ and ‘glue’ of a city. The expert gives
examples. Ask them to listen and decide if the examples given are ‘magnets’ or
‘glue’.
• Once they have listened the first time give the students time to compare their
answers, then ask them to listen again and see if they can add examples to the list.
• Finally ask them to look at the tapescript and check their answers.
Worksheet 15 - 20 Are these examples of ‘magnets’ or ‘glue’?
6 minutes
1. availability of jobs
(OC3) 2. a variety of job opportunities
3. affordable housing
5. a city’s reputation
6. educational opportunities
Answers:
1. = M 2. = M 3. = G 4. = M 5. = M 6. = G 7. = G
I: Here we are with Dr Marylyn, a professor at the local university and an expert in
population movement. Dr Marylyn, You talk about magnets and glue - things that
attract
migrants to cities, and things that keep them there. Can you explain what you
mean by
these terms?
E: Yes, of course. Well, basically, we begin with the idea that important
international cities
have to be competitive in the global economy. Cities which are not competitive
decline –
they begin to lose population. To be competitive, they have to attract skills and
talent from
all over the world. The most successful cities attract the best skills and talent, and
become
even more successful. The magnets are what attract people to these cities.
I: Yes that makes sense. So what attracts people to these cities? What are the
magnets?
E: Well, probably the most important magnet is the availability of jobs. Cities that
offer lots of
job opportunities, and a wide variety of jobs, attract a lot of migrants.
New York, Paris, Moscow – you’ve seen them on TV, you’ve heard of them,
you’ve seen
them in newspapers and magazines – they give the impression of being safe,
accessible,
open cities. This is why cities organise international events like the Olympics,
EXPOs,
Foreign people are happier in a place where there are lots of foreign people. It’s
also true
that people feel more secure in cities where there are lots of people from their own
countries. It gives them access to their home culture – shops, family and friends,
cultural
events.
I: Well, going back to what we said before – that successful cities need the skills
and talents
of migrant workers. Well, if the migrants attract them, the glue convinces them to
stay – and
I: So what kind of thing encourages people to stay in a place? What’s the glue?
E: Well, cities that want to retain migrants need to pay attention to the quality of
life on offer.
I: Yeah.
and their children, cultural and recreational activities. They need access to social
and
community activities, to belong to the community. They need access to the job
market in
terms of visas and legal permits. They need to be able to set up their own business
if they
want. These are the glue factors. Other factors like (fade out).....
• To round the activity off ask students if they agree with the expert and ask if
there
are any ‘magnets’ and ‘glue’ missing from the list that they think are important. •
Ask the students what the ‘magnets’ and ‘glue’ of their own city are for them. Try
Vocabulary revision
• Put your students into groups or teams. Tell them that you are going to have a
quick vocabulary quiz. You will say the definition of a word and the first students
that calls out the correct word will get a point for their team. • Use the words from
the list below and give simple definitions.
Vocabulary review
Photocopy one copy of Worksheet Task 10 per group of four students and cut
them
into cards.
• Put the cards in a pile for each group. Demonstrate the activity by picking up one
of the cards, and defining, explaining, describing the word on the card until
someone guesses what is written on the card. Explain that they should do the
same in groups taking it in turns to explain the word while others guess. When a
student guesses the word, s/he keeps the card. The winner in each group is the
student with the most cards. • Listen while the students play the game and check
that they still remember the
vocabulary. Keep note of any word they have problems with and revise them at
organisation
unemployment discrimination
poverty famine
Intermediate
Time
90 minutes
Materials
Worksheet
https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/sites/teacheng/files/Success%20and%20fame
%20worksheets.pdf
Introduction
This double topic deals with success, something we are all keen to have in our lives and fame,
something many of us are not. This lesson was created for Intermediate level students but
could be adapted for other levels.
Procedure
Quizizz
Lead in 5 minutes Search on the Internet about definition of success and some examples
of success
5.Target (n): a level or situation that you intend to achieve (mục tiêu)
11. Attainment (n): the act of achieving something (đạt được (nhấn
mạnh vào sau 1 quá trình))
15.renowned (adj): famous for something (được công nhận, được tôn
vinh
Nowadays, there are many celebrities who are famous for their
glamour and wealth rather than achievements and this sets a bad
example for young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Topic
SUCCESS AND FAME
Preparation
Intermediate +
Time
Procedure
Check 5 https://quizizz.com/admin/quiz/66052e62d61a160441109909?
Up:
Quizizz minutes source=quiz_share
• Then, working as a group, take definitions from the class and write
them on the board to decide which is the best.
Stage 2 10 • Now we start to reflect about how success is defined in real terms. To
minutes do this, I give students a list (Worksheet B) of situations in which people
have achieved something. Their task is simple in theory, to decide which
of the situations are
examples of true success, but it’s most certainly not all black and white,
there are plenty of gray areas. Ask Chat GPT its opinion on this
1.Success (n): the achieving of the results wanted or hoped for (sự thành
công)
5.Target (n): a level or situation that you intend to achieve (mục tiêu)
9.Take off (phr v): to suddenly start to be successful or popular (trở nên
nổi tiếng đột ngột)
11. Attainment (n): the act of achieving something (đạt được (nhấn
mạnh vào sau 1 quá trình))
12.meet (your objectives) (v): to fulfil, satisfy, or achieve (đạt được mục
tiêu)
15.renowned (adj): famous for something (được công nhận, được tôn
vinh
Nowadays, there are many celebrities who are famous for their glamour
and wealth rather than achievements and this sets a bad example for
young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Topic
This lesson looks at how farming can damage the environment, but also how climate change can damage
farming
Outcomes
During and after the lesson, learners will be able to demonstrate they can:
• make an argument from a perspective they may not agree with
• participate in a discussion where agreement needs to be reached
• understand and use key vocabulary around environmental issues.
Students will learn how to use ChatGPT's sixth features to generate content outlines for
various purposes.
Students will practice structuring and organizing their ideas effectively using ChatGPT's
assistance.
Materials
The teacher will need:
• Presentation
• Farming and the environment worksheet
• Farming and the environment worksheets 1–6.
Student worksheet:
https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/sites/teacheng/files/2024-01/Student_worksheet.pdf
Role 1+2: https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/sites/teacheng/files/2024-01/Worksheet
%20Role_1_and_2.pdf
Role 3+4:
https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/sites/teacheng/files/2024-01/Worksheet%20role
%205%20and%206.pdf
Quizizz: https://quizizz.com/admin/quiz/6607e337052d746ab9f0b7b8?source=quiz_share
Introduction
This lesson looks at how farming can damage the environment, but also how climate change
can make farming difficult with the help of Chat GPT. Students will be discussing farming
and the environment from different perspectives, and some groups will present their ideas to
the whole class.
Procedure
Main Time Details
activity period
Quizizz 10 https://quizizz.com/admin/quiz/6607e337052d746ab9f0b7b8?
minutes source=quiz_share
Topic
This lesson looks at how farming can damage the environment, but also how climate change can damage
farming
Outcomes
During and after the lesson, learners will be able to demonstrate they can:
• make an argument from a perspective they may not agree with
• participate in a discussion where agreement needs to be reached
• understand and use key vocabulary around environmental issues.
Students will learn how to use ChatGPT's sixth features to generate content outlines for
various purposes.
Students will practice structuring and organizing their ideas effectively using ChatGPT's
assistance.
Time
60 minutes + 30 minutes writing activity.
Materials
The teacher will need:
• Presentation
• Farming and the environment worksheet
• Farming and the environment worksheets 1–6.
Student worksheet:
https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/sites/teacheng/files/2024-01/Student_worksheet.pdf
Role 1+2: https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/sites/teacheng/files/2024-01/Worksheet
%20Role_1_and_2.pdf
Role 3+4:
https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/sites/teacheng/files/2024-01/Worksheet%20role
%205%20and%206.pdf
Quizizz: https://quizizz.com/admin/quiz/6607e337052d746ab9f0b7b8?source=quiz_share
Introduction
This lesson looks at how farming can damage the environment, but also how climate change
can make farming difficult with the help of Chat GPT. Students will be discussing farming
and the environment from different perspectives, and some groups will present their ideas to
the whole class.
Procedure
Main Time Details
activity period
Quizizz 10 https://quizizz.com/admin/quiz/6607e337052d746ab9f0b7b8?
minutes source=quiz_share
ChatGPT is not just a conversational AI; it's also a powerful tool for
content creation. With its Content Outline Generation capability,
ChatGPT can assist you in structuring your ideas and organizing your
content effectively.
Prompts:
"ChatGPT, I'm working on a guide about effective time management
techniques. Can you create an outline detailing the main strategies and
subtopics to include?"
"I'm writing an article on the benefits of meditation for mental health.
Could you provide an outline outlining the key advantages and
sections to cover?"
"Hi ChatGPT! I'm preparing a presentation on renewable energy
sources. Can you generate an outline outlining the main types of
renewable energy and their benefits?"
"I need to create a blog post about the history of artificial intelligence.
Can you generate an outline summarizing the key milestones and
developments in AI history?"
Topic
Marketing tricks that stores use
Outcomes
Raise awareness of common techniques that stores use to make you spend more
Increase vocabulary to describe stores
Practise cause–effect language (e.g. so that, in order to, it makes us go/say/etc.)
Encourage critical thinking, creative skills and collaboration
Learning and be able to apply Chat GPT’s Key word Detection Feature
Age group and level
Intermediate +
Time
60 minutes + 30 minutes writing activity.
Materials
1. Student worksheet
https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/sites/teacheng/files/
Shopping_Sales_tricks_Worksheet.pdf
2. Poster paper (or an internet site which enables students to design a store) Sources:
http://time.com/money/3069933/ways-companies-trick-you-into-buying-more/
http://www.businessinsider.com/tricks-stores-use-to-make-you-spend-more-money-
2015-10#-17
Introduction
Shopping is a popular activity, both on a daily basis and before big events like Christmas and
New Year. Nowadays, stores use numerous tricks to make shoppers spend more money. By
raising awareness of some common marketing tricks, students can be more careful when they
go shopping. In this lesson, students take part in a discussion which tests their awareness of
what happens in their favorite stores. They read a blog about common tricks used by retailers,
which is both interesting and enlightening. Next, students plan their own stores in groups,
applying the new language and information they’ve learned. Finally, they present their ideas
to the class, using posters to help them explain their ideas
Procedure
Main activity Time Details
period
Lead in 10 • If appropriate, ask students how many days there are until
minutes Christmas (or another time when people buy gifts). Explain that
today’s lesson is to learn about techniques that stores use to
make you spend more money.
• Divide students into pairs or groups. Hand out the worksheet.
• Students discuss the questions in Q1. Provide help with the
following vocabulary: checkout counter, window display,
background music, discounts, special deals.
Students use the Internet to be explained about new vocabs.
Reading 15 • Students read the blog individually and silently. Set a time
minutes limit of 10 minutes. • They read and circle three techniques that
they find interesting. After reading, students compare what they
circled. • (Optional) Draw students’ attention to the language of
cause–effect, for example so that you …, so you …, in order to
…, it makes you … Ask students to find examples. • Put
students into pairs or groups. Explain that they should discuss
the different types of techniques, give examples, and state the
effect they have on us as shoppers. Point out that there is more
than one answer for some.
• Students answer the questions in pairs or groups. Monitor
and help if necessary. AK (possible answers):
Presentation 5 Finally, students show their stores to each other and explain
minutes why they have done certain things (for example, ‘We put the
fitting rooms at the back so that customers pass this counter.’).
Useful language 20
1.
minutes Bill (n): a request for payment of money owed, or the piece of
paper on which is written (hóa đơn)
6. Price (n): the amount of money that you have to pay in order
to buy something (giá tiền)
9. Checkout (n): the place in a shop where you pay for your
goods (quầy thu ngân)
13. Wide range (n): different things of the same type (đa dạng)
15. Labour saving (adj): saving time and effort (tiết kiệm cả tgian
và công sức)
19. Shopaholic (n): a person who enjoys shopping very much (tín
đồ mua sắm)
Topic
Marketing tricks that stores use
Outcomes
Raise awareness of common techniques that stores use to make you spend more
Increase vocabulary to describe stores
Practise cause–effect language (e.g. so that, in order to, it makes us go/say/etc.)
Encourage critical thinking, creative skills and collaboration
Learning and be able to apply Chat GPT’s Key word Detection Feature
Time
60 minutes + 30 minutes writing activity.
Materials
1. Student worksheet
https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/sites/teacheng/files/
Shopping_Sales_tricks_Worksheet.pdf
2. Poster paper (or an internet site which enables students to design a store) Sources:
http://time.com/money/3069933/ways-companies-trick-you-into-buying-more/
http://www.businessinsider.com/tricks-stores-use-to-make-you-spend-more-money-
2015-10#-17
Introduction
Shopping is a popular activity, both on a daily basis and before big events like Christmas and
New Year. Nowadays, stores use numerous tricks to make shoppers spend more money. By
raising awareness of some common marketing tricks, students can be more careful when they
go shopping. In this lesson, students take part in a discussion which tests their awareness of
what happens in their favorite stores. They read a blog about common tricks used by retailers,
which is both interesting and enlightening. Next, students plan their own stores in groups,
applying the new language and information they’ve learned. Finally, they present their ideas
to the class, using posters to help them explain their ideas
Procedure
Main activity Time Details
period
Lead in 10 • If appropriate, ask students how many days there are until
minutes Christmas (or another time when people buy gifts). Explain that
today’s lesson is to learn about techniques that stores use to
make you spend more money.
• Divide students into pairs or groups. Hand out the worksheet.
• Students discuss the questions in Q1. Provide help with the
following vocabulary: checkout counter, window display,
background music, discounts, special deals.
Students use Chat GPT’s second feature to be explained about
new vocabs.
New feature: Keyword Detection
Explain that ChatGPT, an AI language model, can be
used for keyword detection by crafting prompts that
elicit specific responses containing the desired
keywords.
Provide examples of scenarios where keyword detection
can be useful, such as content filtering, sentiment
analysis, or information extraction.
Prompts:
Please analyze the following text and identify any key
words or phrases related to artificial intelligence.
Could you analyze the text provided and pick out any
words or phrases that seem particularly relevant to the
subject matter?
Can you extract key terms about “apple” from the
following passage?
Reading 15 • Students read the blog individually and silently. Set a time
minutes limit of 10 minutes. • They read and circle three techniques that
they find interesting. After reading, students compare what they
circled. • (Optional) Draw students’ attention to the language of
cause–effect, for example so that you …, so you …, in order to
…, it makes you … Using Chat GPT new feature to do that.
Ask students to find examples. • Put students into pairs or
groups. Explain that they should discuss the different types of
techniques, give examples, and state the effect they have on us
as shoppers. Point out that there is more than one answer for
some.
• Students answer the questions in pairs or groups. Monitor
and help if necessary. AK (possible answers):
Presentation 5 Finally, students show their stores to each other and explain
minutes why they have done certain things (for example, ‘We put the
fitting rooms at the back so that customers pass this counter.’).
Useful language 20
1. Bill (n): a request for payment of money owed, or the piece of
minutes
paper on which is written (hóa đơn)
6. Price (n): the amount of money that you have to pay in order to
buy something (giá tiền)
9. Checkout (n): the place in a shop where you pay for your goods
(quầy thu ngân)
13. Wide range (n): different things of the same type (đa dạng)
15. Labour saving (adj): saving time and effort (tiết kiệm cả tgian
và công sức)
19. Shopaholic (n): a person who enjoys shopping very much (tín
đồ mua sắm)
21st-century jobs
Topic
The future of work and its impact on the environment
Outcomes
During and after the lesson, learners will be able to demonstrate they can:
• work collaboratively to analyse and discuss the future of work and its environmental impacts
by
using 21st-century skills
• use a selection of modal verbs as required
• write a short analytical paragraph on a collaborative basis.
Time
60 minutes + 30 minutes writing activity.
Materials
The teacher will need:
• Student worksheets
https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/sites/teacheng/files/2024-01/21st%20century%20jobs
%20Adult%20Student%20worksheet.pdf
• All the content from the student worksheets is on the downloadable class PowerPoint
slides.
Introduction
This lesson will encourage learners to discuss the future of work and the environmental
impact that the workplace can and could have. They will consider both the types of jobs that
we can expect to develop in the 21st century and the nature and characteristics of the jobs.
The final task will be to make a list of ideas for the future of work in the light of the climate
crisis and global inequality.
Procedure
Main activity Time Details
period
Lead in 10 Ask your students to think about what their ideal job is. They don’t
minutes need to write anything. (Ask additional questions based on
students’ answer)
Salary (n)E. a fixed amount of money agreed every year as pay for
an employee, usually paid directly into his or
her bank account every month
Paperwork (n) L. the part of a job that involves writing letters and
reports and keeping records
Stand in for (phr v) M. do sb's job for them while they are not
available
21st-century jobs
Topic
The future of work and its impact on the environment
Outcomes
During and after the lesson, learners will be able to demonstrate they can:
• work collaboratively to analyse and discuss the future of work and its environmental impacts
by
using 21st-century skills
• use a selection of modal verbs as required
• write a short analytical paragraph on a collaborative basis.
Time
60 minutes + 30 minutes writing activity.
Materials
The teacher will need:
• Student worksheets
https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/sites/teacheng/files/2024-01/21st%20century%20jobs
%20Adult%20Student%20worksheet.pdf
• All the content from the student worksheets is on the downloadable class PowerPoint
slides.
Introduction
This lesson will encourage learners to discuss the future of work and the environmental
impact that the workplace can and could have. They will consider both the types of jobs that
we can expect to develop in the 21st century and the nature and characteristics of the jobs.
The final task will be to make a list of ideas for the future of work in the light of the climate
crisis and global inequality.
Procedure
Main activity Time Details
period
Lead in 10 Ask your students to think about what their ideal job is. They
minutes don’t need to write anything.
• Select a few learners to explain what their ideal job is and why?
Explain to students how ChatGPT can be used to create quizzes by
providing prompts related to a specific topic.
Discuss the types of questions that can be generated, such as
multiple-choice, true/false, or short answer, and the process of
refining the questions and answers.
Prompts:
“Create a quiz about epic journeys and daring explorations”
“Imagine a quiz about myths, legends, and folklore from around
the world. Include questions about gods and goddesses, legendary
heroes.”
“Generate a quiz about the mysteries of outer space and the
cosmos”
Each student asks Chat GPT to create 3 quizzes with answers
about vocabulary relating to jobs and working environment to ask
his classmate.
Salary (n)E. a fixed amount of money agreed every year as pay for
an employee, usually paid directly into his or
her bank account every month
Paperwork (n) L. the part of a job that involves writing letters and
reports and keeping records
Stand in for (phr v) M. do sb's job for them while they are not
available
Fake news
Topic
Learning how to identify fake websites
Outcomes
• Expand knowledge of vocabulary related to news and the media
• Recognise fake news through discussion and reading
• Use critical thinking, collaboration and media literacy skills
Introduce ChatGPT as a tool that can assist in generating relevant follow-up questions in
conversations.
Time
60 minutes + 30 minutes writing activity.
Materials
1. Worksheet
https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/sites/teacheng/files/2024-03/
Fake_news_student_worksheet.pdf
2. Presentation (This can replace the worksheet)
3. High-tech classes: Use the internet. Send students to the two websites online. Low-tech
classes: Make photocopies of the two website pages and hand them out to students.
https://zapatopi.net/treeoctopus/
https://www.atlasobscura.com/places/octopus-tree-of-oregon
Introduction
The lesson begins with a brief discussion about news and fake news. Students then skim read
two webpages. One website is about the Tree Octopus (a spoof), while the other is about the
Octopus Tree. After a brief reading comprehension activity, students study the websites, using
a set of questions to help them. The goal is to discover which one is the fake website and why
it’s fake! As a final activity, students find other fake news stories currently circulating the
internet. They choose one from the list and design a post or meme advising their friends not to
fall for it.
Procedure
Main Time Details
activity period
Lead in 10 • Tell the class that today’s lesson is about real and fake news
minutes websites.
• Hand out the worksheet or display slide 2. Ask students to answer
Task 1 in small groups.
• Bring the class back together. Elicit the meaning of ‘fake news’.
• Encourage students to come up to the board and write a simple
definition. Use prompts to help them develop a more complete
definition as a class, e.g. Is it deliberate? Is it always a complete lie or
does it contain some true elements? Where do you find it? How is it
spread? Why is it done? Read out the definition or display slide 3.
Definition
Fake news: the deliberate spreading of misinformation or hoaxes
spread via traditional
print and broadcast news media or online media. Fake news is written
and published
usually with the intent to mislead in order to damage an agency, entity
or person,
and/or gain financially or politically, often using sensationalist,
dishonest or outright
fabricated headlines and images to increase readership. (Wikipedia)
Fake news: false stories that appear to be news, spread on the internet
or using other
media, usually created to influence political views or as a joke.
(Cambridge Dictionary)
Discovery 10 Lead students into Task 3. Explain that one of the two websites was
activity minutes fake! Invite
them to guess which one, but don’t give away the answer!
• Turn to p.2 of the worksheet or display slides 6 and 7. Explain that
we can use five
questions to help us validate websites. Pre-teach some useful
vocabulary from the questions: credible/genuine/authentic/legitimate,
suspicious, sensational, source, layout, URL, headline, reverse
Google image search, Photoshop.
• Ask students to work in groups. Tell them to apply the questions to
the two websites
in order to find out which one is fake. Students make notes of the
evidence that shows the fake one. Note: students can divide up the
questions between them to make the activity quicker and easier.
• Finally, as a whole class, elicit the answers. Ask: Which one is fake?
(The Tree Octopus). How do you know? Elicit the evidence that
proves it’s fake (1. The URL is incomplete; 2. the content – see the
section on history – is sensational and not
credible; 3. the images of the octopus consist entirely of artwork and
Photoshopped images – a reverse image search shows this; 4. there is
no ‘About Us’ section or contact information on the page; 5. a simple
check on more credible websites, such
as Snopes and Wikipedia, reveals that the creature doesn’t exist.)
• Optional: Have students look at the Wikipedia entry for the Tree
Octopus and the Octopus Tree. Additionally, invite them to look at the
Snopes page, which explains
that it’s fake. (Note that this excellent Tree Octopus site has been used
in schools around the world to test students’ media literacy skills.)
• Ask students: Did you guess it was fake? How? What do you think
of the quality of the fake website?
Writing 30 mins Fake news is becoming increasingly common in the era of social
media. What problems will it cause to individuals and the society?
Suggest some measures to deal with it.
Fake news
Topic
Learning how to identify fake websites
Outcomes
• Expand knowledge of vocabulary related to news and the media
• Recognise fake news through discussion and reading
• Use critical thinking, collaboration and media literacy skills
Introduce ChatGPT as a tool that can assist in generating relevant follow-up questions in
conversations.
Time
60 minutes + 30 minutes writing activity.
Materials
1. Worksheet
https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/sites/teacheng/files/2024-03/
Fake_news_student_worksheet.pdf
2. Presentation (This can replace the worksheet)
3. High-tech classes: Use the internet. Send students to the two websites online. Low-tech
classes: Make photocopies of the two website pages and hand them out to students.
https://zapatopi.net/treeoctopus/
https://www.atlasobscura.com/places/octopus-tree-of-oregon
Introduction
The lesson begins with a brief discussion about news and fake news. Students then skim read
two webpages. One website is about the Tree Octopus (a spoof), while the other is about the
Octopus Tree. After a brief reading comprehension activity, students study the websites, using
a set of questions to help them. The goal is to discover which one is the fake website and why
it’s fake! As a final activity, students find other fake news stories currently circulating the
internet. They choose one from the list and design a post or meme advising their friends not to
fall for it.
Procedure
Main Time Details
activity period
Lead in 10 • Tell the class that today’s lesson is about real and fake news
minutes websites.
• Hand out the worksheet or display slide 2. Ask students to answer
Task 1 in small groups.
Introduce ChatGPT as a tool that can assist in generating relevant
follow-up questions in conversations.
Prompt:
Hi, I'm [name], and I'm preparing for a job interview for a position in
[role and industry]. Could you act as the interviewer and ask me
some questions?
I am a candidate for a project manager role at a technology startup.
Can you ask me questions about my project management experience,
leadership skills, and ability to handle tight deadlines.
• Bring the class back together. Elicit the meaning of ‘fake news’.
• Encourage students to come up to the board and write a simple
definition. Use prompts to help them develop a more complete
definition as a class, e.g. Is it deliberate? Is it always a complete lie or
does it contain some true elements? Where do you find it? How is it
spread? Why is it done? Read out the definition or display slide 3.
Use Chat GPT feature of giving definition and facts that have been
taught in previous class to give definition about fake news
Definition
Fake news: the deliberate spreading of misinformation or hoaxes
spread via traditional
print and broadcast news media or online media. Fake news is written
and published
usually with the intent to mislead in order to damage an agency, entity
or person,
and/or gain financially or politically, often using sensationalist,
dishonest or outright
fabricated headlines and images to increase readership. (Wikipedia)
Fake news: false stories that appear to be news, spread on the internet
or using other
media, usually created to influence political views or as a joke.
(Cambridge Dictionary)
Discovery 10 Lead students into Task 3. Explain that one of the two websites was
activity minutes fake! Invite
them to guess which one, but don’t give away the answer!
• Turn to p.2 of the worksheet or display slides 6 and 7. Explain that
we can use five
questions to help us validate websites. Pre-teach some useful
vocabulary from the questions: credible/genuine/authentic/legitimate,
suspicious, sensational, source, layout, URL, headline, reverse
Google image search, Photoshop.
• Ask students to work in groups. Tell them to apply the questions to
the two websites
in order to find out which one is fake. Students make notes of the
evidence that shows the fake one. Note: students can divide up the
questions between them to make the activity quicker and easier.
• Finally, as a whole class, elicit the answers. Ask: Which one is fake?
(The Tree Octopus). How do you know? Elicit the evidence that
proves it’s fake (1. The URL is incomplete; 2. the content – see the
section on history – is sensational and not
credible; 3. the images of the octopus consist entirely of artwork and
Photoshopped images – a reverse image search shows this; 4. there is
no ‘About Us’ section or contact information on the page; 5. a simple
check on more credible websites, such
as Snopes and Wikipedia, reveals that the creature doesn’t exist.)
• Optional: Have students look at the Wikipedia entry for the Tree
Octopus and the Octopus Tree. Additionally, invite them to look at the
Snopes page, which explains
that it’s fake. (Note that this excellent Tree Octopus site has been used
in schools around the world to test students’ media literacy skills.)
• Ask students: Did you guess it was fake? How? What do you think
of the quality of the fake website?
Writing 30 mins Fake news is becoming increasingly common in the era of social
media. What problems will it cause to individuals and the society?
Suggest some measures to deal with it.
Music is Great
Topic
Music and music festivals
Outcomes
Identify the meaning of vocabulary in the context of music festivals
• Find out information about a UK festival while practicing reading skills
• Participate in a discussion about what makes a dream festival
• Give a presentation about a dream festival
Time
60 minutes + 30 minutes writing activity.
Materials
Student worksheet
https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/sites/teacheng/files/2024-01/Music_is_Great_StudentWor
ksheet.pdf
Presentation
Procedure
Main Time Details
activity period
Lead in 10 minutes Refer students to the Lead-in activity in the student worksheet or
show slide 2 of the presentation.
The poster shows a photo of Reading Festival, an annual music
festival that takes place in Reading, England.
• Elicit / teach the meanings of the words in question 1. Ask
students to suggest other adjectives e.g. noisy, overwhelming,
fun. There are no correct suggestions. Elicit whether the
adjectives have a positive or negative meaning e.g.
‘overcrowded’ and ‘claustrophobic’ have negative meanings.
Search on the Internet the words you don’t know.
• In pairs or groups, students discuss questions 2 and 3. You may
need to give a time limit for this discussion if students are
enthusiastic about music!
• Invite some pairs to share their answers to question 3.
Pre- 10 minutes Refer students to Task 1 in the student worksheet or show slide 3
reading of the presentation. Individually or in pairs students match the
vocabulary words and definitions.
activity • Provide the answers or ask students to provide answers.
Answers: 1c, 2e, 3b, 4h, 5f, 6a, 7d, 8g Note: You could print and
cut the table into individual cards for students to physically
match. Ask quick finishers to write synonyms / antonyms for the
words. Using Chat GPT’s feature to give synonyms and
antonyms. Note: It may be useful to show pictures of some of the
words e.g. wellies, quagmire.
Reading 15 minutes Tell students that they are going to read about Glastonbury
Festival, a major festival in England. Students search on the
Internet to give information about this festival and share what
they have found to class. Explain that they will have a time limit
to read the text. As they read, they should note anything that
surprises them.
• Refer students to Task 2 in the student worksheet or show slides
4-5 of the presentation. If students are reading the complete text
in the worksheet, give them approximately 5-6 minutes to read. If
you use the slides, give students 2-3 minutes to read the text on
each slide. Explain that this will help them
develop the skill of reading to find the gist of a text.
• Ask some students to say if they found anything surprising.
• Put students into pairs or small groups. Tell them to discuss the
questions below the reading text. Invite some pairs / groups to
share their thoughts. The questions are available on slide 6 of the
presentation. If you are using the presentation, you could write
the questions on the board and show slides 4-5 again.
Music is Great
Topic
Music and music festivals
Outcomes
Identify the meaning of vocabulary in the context of music festivals
• Find out information about a UK festival while practicing reading skills
• Participate in a discussion about what makes a dream festival
• Give a presentation about a dream festival
Time
60 minutes + 30 minutes writing activity.
Materials
Student worksheet
https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/sites/teacheng/files/2024-01/Music_is_Great_StudentWor
ksheet.pdf
Presentation
Procedure
Main Time Details
activity period
Lead in 10 minutes Refer students to the Lead-in activity in the student worksheet or
show slide 2 of the presentation.
The poster shows a photo of Reading Festival, an annual music
festival that takes place in Reading, England.
• Elicit / teach the meanings of the words in question 1. Ask
students to suggest other adjectives e.g. noisy, overwhelming,
fun. There are no correct suggestions. Elicit whether the
adjectives have a positive or negative meaning e.g.
‘overcrowded’ and ‘claustrophobic’ have negative meanings. For
any unknown word, using Chat GPT’s feature of explaining
vocabulary and giving examples.
• In pairs or groups, students discuss questions 2 and 3. You may
need to give a time limit for this discussion if students are
enthusiastic about music! Using Chat GPT for brainstorming
ideas.
• Invite some pairs to share their answers to question 3.
Pre- 10 minutes Refer students to Task 1 in the student worksheet or show slide 3
reading of the presentation. Individually or in pairs students match the
vocabulary words and definitions.
activity • Provide the answers or ask students to provide answers.
Answers: 1c, 2e, 3b, 4h, 5f, 6a, 7d, 8g Note: You could print and
cut the table into individual cards for students to physically
match. Ask quick finishers to write synonyms / antonyms for the
words. Using Chat GPT’s feature to give synonyms and
antonyms. Note: It may be useful to show pictures of some of the
words e.g. wellies, quagmire.
Reading 15 minutes Tell students that they are going to read about Glastonbury
Festival, a major festival in England. Students ask Chat GPT to
give information about this festival and share what they have
found to class. Explain that they will have a time limit to read the
text. As they read, they should note anything that surprises them.
Introduce to Chat GPT’s Article Summarization
ChatGPT as an AI language model capable of generating human-
like text.
Explain that ChatGPT can be used to generate summaries of
articles quickly and efficiently.
Discuss the benefits of using AI for summarization, such as speed
and consistency.PT and Article Summarization
Prompts
"Can you summarize the main points of the article titled 'Climate
Change Impacts on Biodiversity'?"
"I'd like a brief summary of the article 'The Rise of Artificial
Intelligence in Healthcare'."
"Could you provide a concise overview of the article 'Effects of
Social Media on Mental Health'?"
"Summarize the key findings from the article 'The Future of
Renewable Energy Technologies.'"
"Please give me a summary of the article 'COVID-19 Vaccination
Strategies: Global Approaches and Challenges'."
• Refer students to Task 2 in the student worksheet or show slides
4-5 of the presentation. If students are reading the complete text
in the worksheet, give them approximately 5-6 minutes to read. If
you use the slides, give students 2-3 minutes to read the text on
each slide. Explain that this will help them
develop the skill of reading to find the gist of a text.
• Ask some students to say if they found anything surprising.
• Put students into pairs or small groups. Tell them to discuss the
questions below the reading text. Invite some pairs / groups to
share their thoughts. The questions are available on slide 6 of the
presentation. If you are using the presentation, you could write
the questions on the board and show slides 4-5 again.
Suggested answers: 1. There are many more people (more than
100 times as many people), it’s much more expensive, it has
distinct zones for different tastes.
2. Michael Eavis still runs the festival (with his daughter), it is
still on the same farm in SW England. 3. Wet weather (& mud),
‘fencejumpers’ (people who get in without paying), fire (the
Pyramid stage burnt down). 4. They’ve built a ‘superfence’ and
have increased security, they built a new Pyramid stage. People at
the festival accept the mud! 5. They give money to charity. 6.
Some disadvantages are: local traffic problems, overcrowding,
noise pollution, environmental impact (e.g. litter), lack of
hygiene facilities, expense.
Note: If it’s possible, you could show images / videos of
Glastonbury Festival.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rt-
3z2djgKU&list=PLlJ6mcpK7uj5vz5ZtpqxPd8p9sklNyhit
Useful 20 mins
English
languages Collocations for musical activities
1. She plays the guitar but she doesn’t read music. She plays by
ear. She’s got a good ear. She can pick out a tune. You can
make music in lots of ways. You don’t need to be a trained
musician to enjoy music to the full. (to see or recognize)
2. Everyone in the village attends a big feast in the evening [big
meal to celebrate something].
3. The festival is a time of renewal. (to improve)
4. The parade in the town square was a very colourful spectacle.
(a sight, especially one that is very impressive or
wonderful)
1. A lot of people are very superstitious, especially about
numbers and colours. [have illogical beliefs about hidden forces
in nature]
2. The festival celebrated the centenary/bi-centenary of the
country’s independence. [100th anniversary/ 200th anniversary]
3. The Rio de Janeiro Carnival is always a very flamboyant and
raucous event. [extremely colourful and exaggerated] [very
noisy]
4. The Festival of the Dead is very sombre and atmospheric.
[serious, heavy and sad] [has a special feeling or atmosphere] It
can be traced back to pagan times. [its origin may be found in]
[the times when people believed that nature had special powers]
5. The annual holiday commemorates all those who died in the
country’s civil war. [respects and remembers off icially; formal]
Feedback 5 minutes Begin by discussing the importance of effective writing and the
on writing role of feedback in improving writing skills.
Introduce ChatGPT as a tool that can provide feedback on writing
in various aspects such as grammar, clarity, coherence, style, and
content.
Prompts
Please evaluate the grammar and spelling in the following
paragraph: [insert paragraph]"
"Can you assess the clarity and coherence of this sentence: [insert
sentence]?"
"Evaluate the style and tone of this paragraph: [insert
paragraph]."
"Please provide feedback on the overall structure and
organization of this essay: [insert essay excerpt]."
"Assess the content and logical consistency of this argument:
[insert argument]."
0. Test score
Student A
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 Unclassifie A1
d
73
% 15% 8% 3% 3% 0%
Unclassifie
Post
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 d
test
8
77% 7% % 4% 0% 5% A1
Student A
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 Unclassified A1
2
Mini test 1
76% 16% 1% 1% % 3%
0
Mini test 2
84% 10% 3% 0% % 3%
0
Mini test 3
82% 7% 9% 1% % 2%
1
Mini test 4
63% 13% 4% 14% % 6%
0
Mini test 5
65% 13% 15% 7% % 2%
0
Mini test 7
58% 18% 8% 9% % 6%
0
Mini test 8
77% 8% 4% 7% % 4%
1
Average 72% 13% 7% 5% % 3%
Student B
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
Pre
Type-token Mean word MTL
test
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 Unclassified ratio frequency D
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
84
% 7% 4% 2% 0% 3% 0.53 1.9 64 A1
Student
B
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
Mini Type-
test 2 token Mean word
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 Unclassified ratio frequency MTLD 46%
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
Mini Type-
test 3 token Mean word
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 Unclassified ratio frequency MTLD 44%
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
Mini Type-
test 4 token Mean word
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 Unclassified ratio frequency MTLD 44%
Mini Majority
test 5 Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
Mini Type-
test 6 token Mean word
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 Unclassified ratio frequency MTLD 46%
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
Mini Type-
test 7 token Mean word
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 Unclassified ratio frequency MTLD 45%
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
Mini Type-
test 8 token Mean word
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 Unclassified ratio frequency MTLD 45%
79% 10% 3% 3% 1% 3%
Student C
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
83
% 8% 5% 3% 0% 1% 0.45 2.22 77 A1
Majority
Lexical Difficuty Lexical Diversity LC
Mini
Type- Mean word
test 1
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 Unclassified token ratio frequency MTLD
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
Mini
Type- Mean word
test 2
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 Unclassified token ratio frequency MTLD
Mini Majority
test 3 Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
Mini
Type- Mean word
test 4
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 Unclassified token ratio frequency MTLD
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
Mini
Type- Mean word
test 5
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 Unclassified token ratio frequency MTLD
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
Mini
Type- Mean word
test 6
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 Unclassified token ratio frequency MTLD
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
Mini
Type- Mean word
test 7
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 Unclassified token ratio frequency MTLD
80% 9% 3% 4% 0% 5%
Student D
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
Pre
Type-token Mean word
test
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 Unclassified ratio frequency MTLD
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
79
% 8% 7% 3% 1% 0.54 92.58 A1
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
Mini
Type- Mean word
test 1
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 Unclassified token ratio frequency MTLD
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
Mini
Type- Mean word
test 3
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 Unclassified token ratio frequency MTLD
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
Mini
Type- Mean word
test 4
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 Unclassified token ratio frequency MTLD
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
Mini
Type- Mean word
test 5
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 Unclassified token ratio frequency MTLD
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
Mini
Type- Mean word
test 6
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 Unclassified token ratio frequency MTLD
Mini
Type- Mean word
test 7
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 Unclassified token ratio frequency MTLD
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
Mini
Type- Mean word
test 8
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 Unclassified token ratio frequency MTLD
69% 12% 5% 6% 2% 5%
Student E
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
Pre
Type-token Mean word
test
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 Unclassified ratio frequency MTLD
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
Post
Type-token Mean word
test
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 Unclassified ratio frequency MTLD
6
67% 11% 7% 5% % 4% 0.57 79.67 A1
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
2
51% 20% 11% 7% % 9% 0.67 139.48 A1
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
0
78% 10% 3% 5% % 3% 0.68 58.90 A1
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
0
59% 14% 9% 10% % 9% 0.61 60.05 A1
Mini Majority
test 5 Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
1
70% 14% 8% 5% % 3% 0.62 108.48
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
3
58% 17% 11% 6% % 5% 0.64 154.79 A1
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
1
65% 14% 6% 11% % 2% 0.56 46.02 A1
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
2
86% 6% 2% 3% % 1% 0.54 46.16 A1
2
67% 13% 7% 7% % 5%
Student F
79% 9% 4% 3% 0% 4 53.5 A1
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
Post
Type-token Mean word
test
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 Unclassified ratio frequency MTLD
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
Mini
Type- Mean word
test 1
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 Unclassified token ratio frequency MTLD
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
Mini
Type- Mean word
test 2
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 Unclassified token ratio frequency MTLD
Mini Majority
test 3 Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
Mini
Type- Mean word
test 4
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 Unclassified token ratio frequency MTLD
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
Mini
Type- Mean word
test 5
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 Unclassified token ratio frequency MTLD
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
Mini
Type- Mean word
test 6
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 Unclassified token ratio frequency MTLD
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
Mini
Type- Mean word
test 7
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 Unclassified token ratio frequency MTLD
Mini Majority
test 8 Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
69% 14% 9% 5% 1% 4%
Student G
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
Pre Type-
test token Mean word MTL
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 C2 Unclassified ratio frequency D
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
Post Type-
test token Mean word MTL
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 C2 Unclassified ratio frequency D
Student
G
Mini Majority
test 1 Lexical Difficulty Lexical Diversity LC
Type- A1
token Mean word
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 C2 Unclassified ratio frequency MTLD
Mini Type-
test 2 token Mean word
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 C2 Unclassified ratio frequency MTLD
Majority
Lexical Difficulty Lexical Diversity LC
Mini Type-
test 3 token Mean word
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 C2 Unclassified ratio frequency MTLD
Majority
Lexical Difficulty Lexical Diversity LC
Mini Type-
test 4 token Mean word
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 C2 Unclassified ratio frequency MTLD
Majority
Lexical Difficulty Lexical Diversity LC
Type-
Mini
token Mean word
test 5
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 C2 Unclassified ratio frequency MTLD
11
61% 12% % 10% 2% 4% 0.69 80.58 A1
Type-
test 6 token Mean word
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 C2 Unclassified ratio frequency MTLD
Majority
Lexical Difficulty Lexical Diversity LC
Type-
Mini
token Mean word
test 7
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 C2 Unclassified ratio frequency MTLD
12
51% 15% % 12% 5% 5% 0,7 116.57 A1
Majority
Lexical Difficulty Lexical Diversity LC
Mini Type-
test 8 token Mean word
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 C2 Unclassified ratio frequency MTLD
Student H
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
Pre
Type-token Mean word
test
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 Unclassified ratio frequency MTLD
Post
Type-token Mean word
test
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 Unclassified ratio frequency MTLD
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
1
76% 13% 3% 3% % 4% 0.57 81.07 A1
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
0
67% 18% 6% 6% % 3% 0.67 86.95 A1
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
2
70% 15% 4% 4% % 5% 0.56 81.25 A1
0
62% 19% 14% 2% % 2% 0.76 110.08 A1
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
1
77% 10% 6% 3& % 4% 0.7 105.25 A1
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
0
79% 11% 5% 2% % 4% 0.64 63.01
Majority
Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
0
56% 23% 6% 11% % 4% 0.71 91.50
Mini Majority
test 8 Lexical Complexity Lexical Diversity LC
1
71% 14% 6% 4% % 4%
V. Discussion
The integration of AI technology, particularly Chat GPT, into educational settings has
garnered significant attention in recent years. This discussion delves into a comprehensive
analysis of research findings regarding the effectiveness and perception of integrating Chat
GPT into an experimental classroom setting. Through a meticulous examination of key
findings, connections to previous research, unexpected results, limitations, potential follow-up
studies, and implications, this discussion aims to provide a nuanced understanding of the role
of Chat GPT in modern education especially for non-major student at Hanoi University of
Science and Technology.
To begin with, the research findings highlight a substantial increase in lexical diversity and
complexity among students at an experimental class that used Chat GPT. In the Chat GPT
class, both TTR (Type-Token Ratio) and MTLD (Measure of Textual Lexical Diversity)
scores have increased, particularly in terms of B1 and C1 vocabulary, while the traditional
class has remained stable. This trend is also consistent with the CEFR (Common European
Framework of Reference) scores of both classes. This finding aligns with the initial research
question, which sought to explore the potential for Chat GPT to enhance vocabulary skills.
The observed improvement in students' language proficiency suggests that Chat GPT serves
as a valuable tool for augmenting vocabulary acquisition in educational contexts.
Moreover, the overall perception of students towards Chat GPT was predominantly positive,
with a significant majority acknowledging its potential to improve vocabulary at 80%. The
popularity of specific features such as synonym and antonym identification and vocabulary
explanations among students highlights the importance of user-friendly and intuitive
functionalities in driving engagement with AI tools.
Not only understand the benefits of Chat GPT, it is noteworthy that students also
acknowledged the disadvantages of Chat GPT relating to difficult vocabulary, prompts
lacking, and unverified information showing student’s agreement that “ChatGPT was unable
to examine the quality and reliability of sources”. However, these higher education students
have proposed practical solutions to address limitations of Chat GPT, such as exploring
additional prompts, double-checking responses, or recording new vocabulary. This proactive
engagement underscores the adaptability of students in leveraging AI technology to optimize
their learning experience.
Unexpectedly, significant fluctuations were observed in the performance of the Chat GPT
class towards the end of the study, while the control class maintained a relatively stable
performance. This variability in performance raises questions about the consistency and
reliability of Chat GPT over time. Furthermore, the low usage of Chat GPT for language
learning purposes, despite its significant media coverage, underscores the gap between media
hype and actual adoption of AI technologies in education. Placing these findings in context, it
is essential to consider the specific demographics of the study participants, namely first-year
non-major students at HUST. Understanding the demographic context helps in interpreting
the research findings within a broader socio-cultural framework.
Potential follow-up studies could explore various aspects of Chat GPT integration, including
its impact on speaking and listening skills, as well as its effectiveness across different
educational levels and disciplines. Future research endeavors should aim to address these
limitations and provide more comprehensive evaluations of Chat GPT's efficacy in
educational settings on a larger scale.
In conclusion, the research findings indicate a positive trend towards increased lexical
diversity and favorable perception of Chat GPT among students. This underscores the
promising potential of integrating AI technology into modern education systems to provide
convenience and new learning experiences. However, further research is needed to address
limitations and fully understand the implications of Chat GPT integration in educational
settings. By conducting rigorous research and fostering collaboration between researchers,
educators, and technology developers, we can harness the transformative power of AI to
enrich teaching and learning experiences in the digital age.
0. Interview
Interview answers
Student 1
Trước khi tham gia khóa học thì bạn đã từng sử dụng Chat GPt trong việc
Trước khi tham gia khóa học của chị thì em dùng Chat GPT cho việc khác còn học
Tiếng Anh thì chưa từng. Tại vì lúc đầu em chỉ nghĩ là dùng từ điển nhanh hơn.
Em dùng Chat GPT trong những việc cụ thể như thế nào nhỉ?
Thì tức là em không dùng Chat GPT nhiều nhưng mà ờm em dùng kiểu cần tra
thông tin nhanh thì em sẽ dùng Chat GPT bởi vì nó sẽ hiện thông tin nhanh cho
mình kiểu em cần cái đôi khi em cần cái ý tưởng gì đấy nhưng mà nó cũng không
đúng mục đích của em lắm nên là sau đó em không dùng nhiều.
Trong thời gian tham gia khóa học “Việc sử dụng Chat GPT giúp tôi học từ
vựng tốt hơn” Đánh giá mức độ đồng tình với quan điểm trên trong thang
điểm từ 1-5
Em nghĩ thang 5 bởi vì là, bởi vì là em khá bất ngờ vì nhiều tính năng của Chat
Em có thể nói cụ thể những cái tính năng của Chat GPT mà em cảm thấy nó
chính là cái lợi ích cho em trong cái quá trình cải thiện từ vựng của em không,
Thì đầu tiên là từ vựng thì bình thường mình tra từ điển thì một số cái sẽ không có
nhiều từ đồng nghĩa với trái nghĩa. Ý là nó sẽ không có nhiều lắm hoặc là nó không
có mà mình tra bằng Chat GPT thì nó sẽ có rất nhiều và như chị đánh giá thì nó có
cả những từ gọi là cấp bậc cao hơn thì mình có thể học từ mới nhiều hơn. Đấy là
đầu tiên còn là cái cơ bản còn cái mà em thấy nó, nó kiểu khiến em gọi là ngộ giá ý
thì là mình có thể trao đổi qua lại với Chat GPT kiểu kiểu như nói chuyện các thứ
thì mình sẽ học được nhiều cái, kiểu cũng tra được nhiều thông tin mình cần ý
tưởng gì đấy cho cái bài viết của mình thì mình cũng tra được cái thông tin ấy.
Hoặc ờ đấy là học Tiếng Anh, còn kiểu có một cái gọi là ở cái cái ý tưởng khi mà
mình lúc đấy đi phỏng vấn người ta sẽ kiểu bảo Chat GPT hỏi là, hỏi mình một số câu
hỏi lúc phỏng vấn á. Em thấy cái bất ngờ là hỏi qua lại với Chat GPT được. Nó
cũng trả lời như kiểu mình nói với một người nào đó ý.
Đó là những tính năng chung còn tính năng của Chat GPT giúp đỡ cải thiện
Dạ vâng
Trong thời gian tham gia khóa học “Tôi cảm thấy khó khăn khi sử dụng Chat
GPT trong việc học từ vựng” Đánh giá mức độ đồng tình với quan điểm trên
Ờm em nghĩ là, em nghĩ là ờm 1. Thì em cảm thấy là không có khó khăn gì lắm.
Dạ vâng.’
Trong việc học từ vựng của em, em không có nhiều khó khăn lắm đúng không
nhỉ?
Em nghĩ là học qua Chat GPT nó, nó không kiểu khó khăn lắm khi mà mình có thể
ờ hỏi lại rất nhiều kiểu mình có thể sao nhở mình không hiểu thì mình có thể hỏi
những từ mình không hiểu mình lại bắt đầu hỏi lại thêm nó từ những cái đấy
Kiểu mình mình trả lời định nghĩa bằng Tiếng Anh xong rồi kiểu mình hiểu mình
không phải nói gì ngay bằng Tiếng Việt đâu, mình muốn vẫn dịch được nhưng mà
mình hiểu được theo nghĩa của Tiếng Anh thì đôi khi nó đúng hơn ý. Em thấy cái
Dạ vâng.
Trong thời gian tham gia khóa học bạn đã gặp những khó khăn gì trong việc
Trong thời gian tham gia khóa học thì tôi đã gặp nhiều cái khó khăn trong việc sử
dụng Chat GPT để sử dụng từ vựng là có nhiều từ mình không thể biết được nghĩa
của một cái câu hỏi hoặc cụm câu hỏi để mình hỏi cái Chat GPT. Nhiều cái mình
quên cái câu hỏi đấy mình không biết sử dụng cái nào.
Có những bạn sẽ gặp hơi khó khăn trong việc học từ vựng thông qua Chat
GPT hoặc là sử dụng Chat GPT để thực hiện những cái tính năng khác, em có
Ờm thực ra thì em kiểu em không thấy nó khó khăn gì cả nên là, kiểu nếu mà, nếu
mà mình không hiểu thì mình có thể hỏi lại ngay được các thứ với lúc mà mình hỏi
xong ý thì, thì à có thể note lại để kiểu học thì nó sẽ kiểu nhớ, mình có thể note lại
kiểu dễ nhớ hơn vì chắc là học từ vựng sẽ dễ hơn so với việc là mình hỏi xong
mình để đấy.
Bạn có định sử dụng Chat GPT để học từ vựng trong tương lai hay không?
Ờm em nghĩ là sau khi tham gia xong cái lớp học này thì em sẽ sử dụng nhiều ý vì,
vì à chắc là thời gian tới em sẽ bắt đầu học Tiếng Anh lại kiểu để lấy chứng chỉ thì
Không em nghĩ là em sẽ học IELTS luôn bởi vì, bởi vì em cần IELTS hơn ý.
Lý do bạn muốn tiếp tục sử dụng Chat GPT trong việc học từ vựng là gì?
Tại vì trước khi học lớp của chị em chỉ nghĩ đơn giản là Chat GPT thì mình cũng
tra như kiểu từ điển thì nó cũng không khác lắm mà mất công mở một cái tab ra thì
nói chung là nó mất công ý. Nhưng mà sau khi xong rồi thì em thấy là kiểu có
nhiều tính năng mà mình không biết để khai thác nên là sau khi mình biết rồi ý thì
Dạ vâng. Kiểu lúc mà tra từ đồng nghĩa với trái nghĩa thì nó sẽ cho mình một list
luôn thì mình có thể kiểu. Em thấy rất bất ngờ luôn bởi vì nó có nhiều cái mình
chưa khai thác được, em thấy kiểu các chị dạy cho xong mình kiểu, lúc học em
nghĩ là kiểu ồ sau này mình có thể dùng thế này để học nó tiện hơn các thứ.
Student 2
Trước khi tham gia khóa học thì bạn đã từng sử dụng Chat GPt trong việc
Trước khi tham gia khóa học thì tôi chưa từng sử dụng Chat GPT để học Tiếng
Anh. Tôi sử dụng Chat GPT để tìm hiểu những cái vấn đề trong cuộc sống nhiều
hơn.
Nếu có thì bạn sử dụng như thế nào và tần suất như thế nào
Trước đó thì sẽ thường là sử dụng trong cái việc tìm về những vấn đề liên quan đến
toán học và những cái vấn đề trong cuộc sống thì thường là sẽ chỉ hỏi như đang trò
Thường thì ít khi sử dụng tầm có khả năng nhiều thì 1 tuần sẽ sử dụng đến 2-3 lần
và mỗi lần sử dụng thì cũng không mất nhiều thời gian chỉ tầm có 5-10 phút là
cùng.
Trước khi tham gia khóa học thì bạn đã từng sử dụng Chat GPT trong việc
Trước khi tham gia khóa học thì tôi chưa từng sử dụng Chat GPT trong việc học từ
Trong thời gian tham gia khóa học “Việc sử dụng Chat GPT giúp tôi học từ
vựng tốt hơn” Đánh giá mức độ đồng tình với quan điểm trên trong thang
điểm từ 1-5
Tôi rất đồng ý với cái việc là trong thời gian tham gia khóa học thì việc sử dụng
Trong thời gian tham gia khóa học, bạn nhận thấy những lợi ích gì của việc sử
Chat GPT thì đã giúp tôi biết nhiều từ vựng hơn qua những cái câu hỏi về tìm từ
đồng nghĩa, từ trái nghĩa với cả là giúp trả lời nhiều câu hỏi về vấn đề từ vựng.
Trong thời gian tham gia khóa học “Tôi cảm thấy khó khăn khi sử dụng Chat
GPT trong việc học từ vựng” Đánh giá mức độ đồng tình với quan điểm trên
Tôi mức độ trung lập bởi vì nó cũng có những cái khó trong việc sử dụng bởi vì
mới đầu cũng kiểu là không biết nhiều dạng câu hỏi để hỏi với cả một chút khó
Trong thời gian tham gia khóa học bạn đã gặp những khó khăn gì trong việc
Trong thời gian tham gia khóa học thì tôi đã gặp nhiều cái khó khăn trong việc sử
dụng Chat GPT để sử dụng từ vựng là có nhiều từ mình không thể biết được nghĩa
của một cái câu hỏi hoặc cụm câu hỏi để mình hỏi cái Chat GPT. Nhiều cái mình
quên cái câu hỏi đấy mình không biết sử dụng cái nào.
Bạn đã tìm ra giải pháp để khắc phục những khó khăn bạn gặp phải chưa?
Và nếu rồi thì bạn hãy nêu ra giải pháp của bạn.
Trước mắt sau khi học cái khóa học này xong thì tôi cũng có thêm nhiều những cái
câu hỏi nhiều cái vốn từ hơn để hỏi Chat GPT rồi.
Bạn có khó khăn là nhiều từ không trả lời được thì bạn đã khắc phục nó bằng
cách gì?
Sau khóa học này em đã có thêm nhiều từ hơn, nhiều từ vựng, nhiều bộ câu hỏi để
hỏi hơn với cả là sẽ thường xuyên sử dụng những câu đấy để kiểu không bị quên
mất.
Bạn có định sử dụng Chat GPT để học từ vựng trong tương lai hay không?
À. Có. Bởi vì cái việc sử dụng Chat GPT nó mang lại nhiều hiệu quả cho việc tìm
từ. Với một câu hỏi thì có thể ra nhiều đáp án khác nhau.
Lý do bạn muốn tiếp tục sử dụng Chat GPT trong việc học từ vựng là gì?
Như cái vừa này em nói thì Chat GPT có thể trả lại cho ta nhiều kết quả khác nhau,
mình có thể biết được nhiều từ hơn, có thể tham khảo được nhiều ý thông qua Chat
GPT.
Student 3
Trước khi tham gia khóa học thì bạn đã từng sử dụng Chat GPT trong việc
Em chưa ạ. Bây giờ là lần đầu tiên em mới sử dụng Chat GPT.
Trước khi tham gia khóa học thì bạn đã từng sử dụng Chat GPT trong việc
Em chưa ạ
Trong thời gian tham gia khóa học “Việc sử dụng Chat GPT giúp tôi học từ
vựng tốt hơn”. Đánh giá mức độ đồng tình với quan điểm trên trong thang
điểm từ 1-5
3 ạ trung lập
dùng Chat GPT thì đa phần các từ trong đấy em đều hiểu nên là nó không thể giúp
Trong thời gian tham gia khóa học, bạn nhận thấy những lợi ích gì của việc sử
Chắc là đầu tiên là em sử dụng Chat GPT thì em thấy nó có thể. Đầu tiên nó có thể
một là đưa ra giải thích từ vựng, giải thích chú thích từ ngữ rõ nghĩa, có thể dịch ra
nhiều thứ tiếng khác nhau để người ta có thể dễ hiểu và nó có thể đưa ra những cái
example ý.
Trong thời gian tham gia khóa học “Tôi cảm thấy khó khăn khi sử dụng Chat
GPT trong việc học từ vựng” Đánh giá mức độ đồng tình với quan điểm trên
Chắc là 1 ạ, rất không đồng ý. Vì em thấy việc chỉ cần mỗi một tab là Chat GPT thì
nó sẽ đỡ khó khăn hơn thay vì phải sử dụng nhiều mọi nguồn thông tin kiểu các
trang mạng khác nhau để kiểm chứng thì chỉ cần Chat GPT nó có thể tổng hợp lại
Trong thời gian tham gia khóa học bạn đã gặp những khó khăn gì trong việc
Em có thể thấy rằng là đôi lúc có một số từ kiểu Chat GPT thì em hiểu nó dịch ra
nghĩa Tiếng Việt chưa đúng lắm, có vài từ nó dịch chưa sát nghĩa nên đôi lúc em
phải lên tra mạng lại để xem là có một nghĩa nào nó gần sát nhất không.
Dạ không.
Bạn đã tìm ra giải pháp để khắc phục những khó khăn bạn gặp phải chưa?
Và nếu rồi thì bạn hãy nêu ra giải pháp của bạn.
Thì tất nhiên là em sẽ sử dụng lại các trang mạng học thuật Tiếng Anh mà kiểu uy
tín ý ạ. Đa phần để học từ vựng em tra cả trên Oxford Dictionary thì nó có phần dễ
hiểu hơn.
Bạn có định sử dụng Chat GPT để học từ vựng trong tương lai hay không?
Em nghĩ là có bởi vì nó khá tiện, vì nó có nhiều chức năng kiểu, nó dễ, nó linh hoạt
vì nó có khá nhiều chức năng, có có thể giải nghĩa tất cả thay vì phải lên từng trang
web một.
Lý do bạn muốn tiếp tục sử dụng Chat GPT trong việc học từ vựng là gì?
Student 4
Trước khi tham gia khóa học thì bạn đã từng sử dụng Chat GPT trong việc
Trước khi tham gia khóa học thì em chưa từng sử dụng ChatGPT, không sử dụng
Trước khi tham gia khóa học thì bạn đã từng sử dụng Chat GPT trong việc
Em chưa từng sử dụng ChatGPT trong việc học từ vựng Tiếng Anh trước khi tham
Trong thời gian tham gia khóa học “Việc sử dụng Chat GPT giúp tôi học từ
vựng tốt hơn”. Đánh giá mức độ đồng tình với quan điểm trên trong thang
điểm từ 1-5 (1 - Rất không đồng ý, 2- Không đồng ý, 3 - Trung lập, 4- Đồng ý,
Thang 4 - Đồng ý.
Theo em thấy, việc sử dụng ChatGPT vào việc học từ vựng. Thường thì em sử
dụng ChatGPT vào việc lấy ideas, khi mà lấy ideas thì nó cũng giải thích rõ ràng
về các ideas đấy, từ đó mình có thể tiếp cận được đến nhiều từ vựng mới.
Trong thời gian tham gia khóa học, bạn nhận thấy những lợi ích gì của việc sử
dụng Chat GPT để cải thiện từ vựng?
Em thấy việc tiếp cận được nhiều từ vựng mới sẽ giúp em mở rộng vốn từ của em
hơn.
Mặc dù ChatGPT có thể giúp em mở rộng thêm nhiều từ mới, nhưng nó không
phải là những từ thông dụng trong việc nói chuyện hàng ngày, ít sử dụng trong
giao tiếp được, hơi mang nghĩa học thuật nên sẽ khó sử dụng trong giao tiếp hàng
ngày.
Trong thời gian tham gia khóa học “Tôi cảm thấy khó khăn khi sử dụng Chat
GPT trong việc học từ vựng” Đánh giá mức độ đồng tình với quan điểm trên
ChatGPT có một tính năng khá hay là nó có thể translate ra hết nên là em thấy cái
việc khó khăn khi mà sử dụng nó cũng không đáng kể vì nếu có từ nào khó thì
mình có thể dịch sang hết tiếng Việt, nên là mình cũng có thể hiểu được luôn.
Trong thời gian tham gia khóa học bạn đã gặp những khó khăn gì trong việc
Theo em thấy nó cũng không có khó khăn gì, thường thì em sẽ lên đấy chỉ để lấy
idea, hoặc nếu từ nào mà không hiểu thì em sẽ dịch ra, nên là em cũng chưa gặp
khó khăn gì trong việc học từ vựng thông qua việc sử dụng ChatGPT.
Bạn đã tìm ra giải pháp để khắc phục những khó khăn bạn gặp phải chưa?
Và nếu rồi thì bạn hãy nêu ra giải pháp của bạn.
Bạn có định sử dụng Chat GPT để học từ vựng trong tương lai hay không?
Có ạ.
Lý do bạn muốn tiếp tục sử dụng Chat GPT trong việc học từ vựng là gì?
Bởi vì không chỉ trong việc học từ vựng, ChatGPT còn có thể giúp mình phát triển
thêm nhiều ideas khác hơn để sử dụng trong những bài viết tiếng Anh, giúp tiếp
cận được nhiều từ vựng liên quan đến học thuật hơn, từ đó giúp mình giải quyết
được nhiều vấn đề khác hơn không chỉ là việc nâng cấp vốn từ vựng của mình.
Student 5
Trước khi tham gia khóa học thì bạn đã từng sử dụng Chat GPT trong việc
Trước khi tham gia khóa học thì bạn đã từng sử dụng Chat GPT trong việc
Dạ vâng ạ. Em chưa từng sử dụng Chat GPT trong bất kì trường hợp nào.
Trong thời gian tham gia khóa học “Việc sử dụng Chat GPT giúp tôi học từ
vựng tốt hơn”. Đánh giá mức độ đồng tình với quan điểm trên trong thang
điểm từ 1-5 (1 - Rất không đồng ý, 2- Không đồng ý, 3 - Trung lập, 4- Đồng ý,
Không đồng ý.
Bởi vì em nghĩ dùng từ điển có vẻ nhanh hơn so với việc sử dụng ChatGPT. Từ
điển nó có thể vừa đưa ra ví dụ, vừa đưa ra nghĩa tiếng Việt và vừa đưa ra cái mô
tả bằng tiếng Anh. Nếu em tra bằng ChatGPT thì dùng tận 3 đến 4 câu hỏi thì mới
Trong thời gian tham gia khóa học, bạn nhận thấy những lợi ích gì của việc sử
Viết topic rất nhanh, có thể đưa ra được nhiều quan điểm. Ví dụ một vấn đề có thể
hỏi ChatGPT và nó sẽ đưa ra rất nhiều quan điểm bằng tiếng Anh. Thế nhưng bằng
tiếng Việt thì nó sẽ không được hay nhưng mà những quan điểm đưa ra bằng tiếng
Trong thời gian tham gia khóa học “Tôi cảm thấy khó khăn khi sử dụng Chat
GPT trong việc học từ vựng” Đánh giá mức độ đồng tình với quan điểm trên
Dùng ChatGPT hỏi 2 câu là ra được hết nghĩa rồi. Cái khó của nó là mình phải gõ
nhiều, tốn thời gian. Nếu yêu cầu nó mô tả, cho nghĩa, cho ví dụ đều oke hết, ta có
thể rõ nghĩa đấy đến mức độ sử dụng, cường độ sử dụng phổ biến của từ đấy trong
Trong thời gian tham gia khóa học bạn đã gặp những khó khăn gì trong việc
Từ nó đưa ra khá là học thuật, hàn lâm. Có những từ mình chưa gặp bao giờ, có khi
là những từ đấy nó sẽ còn không có… Em tự hỏi là những cái từ đấy có được sử
dụng trong ngôn ngữ thường ngày hay không. Vì mục tiêu của em là có thể nói
chuyện trong giao tiếp thường ngày, có khi dùng từ hàn lâm quá người bản ngữ
Bạn đã tìm ra giải pháp để khắc phục những khó khăn bạn gặp phải chưa?
Và nếu rồi thì bạn hãy nêu ra giải pháp của bạn.
Em nghĩ là mình cần thời gian. Bởi vì học càng nhiều thì ta sẽ thấy cái việc nó
Bạn có định sử dụng Chat GPT để học từ vựng trong tương lai hay không?
Nếu mà đánh giá về mức độ thì em nghĩ sẽ là thỉnh thoảng. Nếu như mà sử dụng
thì sử dụng trong việc học từ vựng sẽ ít hơn là việc em sử dụng nó trong những cái
vấn đề như là viết topic, yêu cầu nó đưa ra vấn đề bằng tiếng Anh và chỉ ra từ
vựng.
Lý do bạn muốn tiếp tục sử dụng Chat GPT trong việc học từ vựng là gì?
Nếu như mà sử dụng thì sử dụng trong việc học từ vựng sẽ ít hơn là việc em sử
dụng nó trong những cái vấn đề như là viết topic, yêu cầu nó đưa ra vấn đề bằng tiếng
Anh và chỉ ra.
Vocabulary
"Chat GPT has helped me
explanations +
learn more vocabulary
Clear definition
through questions about
+ translate +
finding synonyms,
examples
antonyms, and also by
answering many questions
about vocabulary issues."
Expose new
ranges of
vocabulary
"Probably the first thing I
noticed when using Chat
GPT is its capability.
Firstly, it can provide
vocabulary explanations,
clear definitions of terms,
translate into various
languages for better
understanding, and offer
examples."
Double-check
“Of course, I will use
reputable English academic
websites again. Mostly, for
vocabulary learning, I
search on the Oxford
Dictionary because it's
easier to understand."
Frequently use
"After this course, I have
acquired more words,
expanded my vocabulary,
and developed more sets of
questions to ask. Moreover,
I will frequently use these
questions to ensure I don't
forget them."
“In terms of frequency of
use, I will frequently use it.
Mind map
REFERENCES
Abdalkader, S.M.A. (2022). Using Artificial Intelligence to improve Writing Fluency for The
Preparatory Stage Students in Distinguished Governmental Language Schools. Egyptian
Journal of Educational Sciences. 2(2), 39–70. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejes.2022.270694
Almalki, S. (2016). Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Data in Mixed Methods Research
Algaraady, J., Mayoob, M. (2023). ChatGPT's Capabilities in Spotting and Analyzing Writing
Errors Experienced by EFL Learners. Arab World English Journal.
https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/call9.1
Attali, Y., & Burstein, J. (2006). Attali, Y., & Burstein, J. (2006). Automated essay scoring
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274309476_Attali_Y_Burstein_J_2006_Autom
ated_essay_scoring_with_e-
raterR_V2_Journal_of_Technology_Learning_and_Assessment_43
Baskara, FX. R. (2023). Integrating ChatGPT into EFL writing instruction: Benefits and
challenges. International Journal of Education and Learning. 5(1),
Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2009). Register, Genre and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814358
Chen, Y. (2020). Assessing the lexical richness of figurative expressions in Taiwanese EFL
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2019.06.007
Daller, M., Turlik, J., and Weir, I. 2013. Vocabulary acquisition and the learning curve. In S.
Jarvis & M. Daller (Eds.), Vocabulary Knowledge: Human ratings and 264 automated
measures, 185-218). John Benjamins, Amsterdam
Denscombe, M. (2010). The Good Research Guide for small-scale social research projects
http://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2023.122.1
Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic Analysis of Qualitative Data. Medical Teacher,
Malina, M. A., Norreklit, H. S. O., & Selto, F. H. (2010). Lessons Learned: Advantages and
Disadvantages of Mixed Method Research. Https://Www.researchgate.net/Profile/Frank-
Selto/Publication/227430195_Lessons_learned_Advantages_and_disadvantages_of_mixe
d_method_research/Links/55ca257208aea2d9bdcbf8f8/Lessons-Learned-Advantages-
And-Disadvantages-of-Mixed-Method-Research.pdf?
Origin=JournalDetail&_tp=EyJwYWdlIjoiam91cm5hbERldGFpbCJ9
Marchandot, B., Matsushita, K., Carmona, A., Trimaille, A., & Morel, O. (2023). ChatGPT:
the next frontier in academic writing for cardiologists or a pandora’s box of ethical
dilemmas. European Heart Journal Open, 3(2), oead007.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oead007
McCarthy, P. M., & Jarvis, S. (2010). MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of
Oxford Learner's Dictionary. (n.d.). The Oxford 3000 and the Oxford 5000. Oxford Learner’s
Dictionary. https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/about/wordlists/oxford3000-
5000#:~:text=The%20Oxford%205000%20is%20an,learn%20to%20expand%20their
%20vocabulary.
Yilmaz, H., Maxutov, S., Baitekov, A., & Balta, N. (2023). Student Attitudes towards Chat
GPT: A Technology Acceptance Model Survey. International Educational Review, 1(1),
57-83. https://doi.org/10.58693/ier.114
Jarvis, S. (2013). Capturing the diversity in lexical diversity. Language Learning, 63(s1), 87–
106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00739.x
file:///C:/Users/Admin/Desktop/majer08_01_03.pdf
Šišková, Z. (2012). Lexical Richness in EFL Students’ Narrative. University of Reading, 4.
https://www.reading.ac.uk/elal/-/media/project/uor-main/schools-departments/elal/
lswp/lswp-4/elal_lswp_vol_4_siskova.pdf?
la=en&hash=E13FADFF59A93DD925B67C972D8F972B&fbclid=IwAR20Ca6a4KKy
wu9oLVb1pPkPT0MxcYpSVPnaZJ4uP3GBwop-A-
aUPLmYY9w_aem_AZ4hL1Lhx3lNE4N-
3V5yaXQiVVQktqNFR5iFSZUqANldg_OV6YXlVqHUaYyviuv8tJ4XB_TiL2be_hO
NHCwD3V6i#:~:text=It%20is%20possible%20to%20measure,sophistication
https://textinspector.com/who-are-we/
Wu, Y. (2023). Study on the Impact of Utilizing ChatGPT and Other AI Tools for Feedback
Wright, H. H., Silverman, S. W., & Newhoff, M. (2003). Measures of lexical diversity in
aphasia. Aphasiology, 17(5), 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030344000166
Xu, X., Wang, X., Zhang, Y., & Zheng, R. (2024). Applying ChatGPT to tackle the side
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295646
Younis, H. A., Mohammed, O. O., Muthmainnah, Sahib, T. M., Akhtom, D., Hayder, I. M.,
Salisu, S., & Shahid, M. (2023). ChatGPT Evaluation: Can it replace Grammarly and
Quillbot tools? British Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 34–
46. https://doi.org/10.32996/bjal.2023.3.2.4