A. Choose the correct answer and fill in the blanks.
1. The British Empire was firmly established by 1856
2. The kotwal were in charge of the cities. 3. The majority of the British Indian army comprised of Civil servants. 4. A charter is a grant from the government giving rights and privileges to an individual or corporation. 5. Before the Charter Act of 1833 the East Indian Company had a monopoly in tea trade in India and China. • Match the columns. Column A Column B 1. Regulating Act a. 1833-1853 2. Pitts India Act b. 1773 3. Charter Act c. 1793 4. Bengal Regulation d. 1784 d. 1784 • C. Fill in the blanks. 1. They Regulating Act failed to check the corruption in the ranks of the East India Company. 2. The Supreme Court was first set up in Calcutta 3. Pitt’s India provides for a board ofcontrol in Britain 4. The East India Company lost its monopoly trading privileges in 1813. 5. The district sub-divisions were under the charge of daroga • D. State whether true or false. If false, correct the statement. • 1. The British government interfered in the activities of the East India Company for the first time in 1753. – False in 1773 • 2. The British administrative structure was meant to promote the welfare of the Indian people. False The British administrative structure was meant to exploit the resources of India. • 3. The Indians in the army and civil services enjoyed equal rights as their British colleagues.- False Indians were not treated equally. 4. The colonial police force enjoyed popular support of the native population – False The colonial police force did not have the support of native population. E. Answer the following questions in 10-20words. 1. What is a charter? Ans. charter is a written grant from the sovereign power of a country conferring certain rights and privileges on a person or corporation. 2. When was the Pitt's India Act implemented? Ans. The Pitt's India Act was implemented in 1784. 3. Who founded the Indian Civil Service? Ans. Lord Cornwallis was the founder of the civil service in India. 4 Name the pillars of British administration. Ans. The four main pillars of British administration were:the civil services, the army, the police, the judiciary 5. When was the Bengal Regulation set up? Ans. The Bengal Regulation was set up in 1793 E. Answer the following questions in 50-70 words. 1. Why did the British Parliament pass the Regulating Act of 1773? Ans. As a result of the misuse of power by officials of the company and the failure of dual government in Bengal, the British Parliament enacted various acts from time to time which laid the foundations of the colonial administrative machinery. The Regulating Act of 1773 was passed by the British to regulate and control the company's affairs.
2.What were the shortcomings of the Regulating Act of 1773?
Ans. Although the Regulating Act of 1773 provisioned for the governor- general to be assisted by a council of four members and put the governors of Bombay and Madras under the governor-general's supervision, it failed to define the powers of the governor-general and the council. As a result, the activities of the East India Company could not be regulated. • 3. What was the position of the Indians in the British administrative structure? Ans. The colonial administrative structure kept Indians out of responsible offices. The field of their employment was narrowed to subordinate positions such as daroga, chowkidar and sepoys. This was mainly because the British were convinced that an administration based on British ideas, institutions and practices could be firmly established only by Englishmen. In this system of administration, the people of India themselves hada very small role to play. • 4. In what ways were the soldiers employed by the British different from those employed by the Indian rulers? Ans. The army raised by the company was loyal and disciplined unlike the armies of the Indian rulers which were unruly and ill-paid. The company sepoys were also trained in the use of the latest arms, which the armies of the Indian rulers did not have access to. However, these soldiers were the soldiers of a colonial power and hence did not have the pride that inspired the soldiers of a national army.established only by Englishmen. In this system of administration, the people ofIndia themselves had a very small role to play.
PT United Can Company Ltd. v. Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc., F/k/a Continental Can Company Richard Krzyzanowski John W. Conway, 138 F.3d 65, 2d Cir. (1998)