Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Article - Attacks On The Food Supply, How Terrorists Enter Into The Equation - (2017 Food Safety Magazine)
Article - Attacks On The Food Supply, How Terrorists Enter Into The Equation - (2017 Food Safety Magazine)
40 40 Share
The scope of the problem of battlefield returnees is vast. Most are male, but not
exclusively so. Some are disillusioned and traumatized (yes—actually suffering post-
tramatic stress disorder) and just wanting to leave the fight altogether. Of these, a
percentage will never again attempt further violence. Other returnees may need only a
respite to rekindle their enthusiasm for violence. Still others have vowed to continue
their fight to the death. Some are highly skilled, well-trained and combat-hardened.
These are the stone-cold killers, who are often clever adversaries. Being smart, these
people may superficially look like good potential employees. The question is, of course,
how do you know who is a threat and who is not?
ISIS or some other terrorist group at some point will again be successful at carrying out
an attack. In the U.S., the likely weapons of choice will be vehicles, improvised
explosives, knives, guns or some combination. In Europe, improvised explosives, vehicles
and knife attacks will predominate for the near future. Europe is getting better at
breaking up terrorist cells, but must be more proactive. Israel intelligence is a master at
proactive operations, largely because of their ability to infiltrate terrorist groups with
native speakers. The U.S. struggles with recruitment of native speakers, but is continually
getting better at infiltrating and disrupting violent groups.
Lone wolves will always be a threat. The recent shooting tragedy that occurred in Las
Vegas is one of those very sad instances that escaped early detection, in part because
Stephen Paddock had no cyber signature to suggest he might be a person of interest. The
problem of a shooter bent on destruction may seem remote to the food industry, but it is
not. Someone like Paddock could as easily have decided to turn on fellow employees.
Here too, prevention is difficult, often made more so by HR restrictions that limit what
investigations can be done with an employee that appears to be potentially violent.
Again, robustness in detection and response are key.
Another potential threat is industrial chemicals, herbicides and pesticides, which will be
sought after by some terrorist groups. Intentional contamination of a food system
already occurred in South Africa in early 2017, when a farmworker put a toxic herbicide
in a dairy storage tank. Not long afterwards, a Nigerian man attempted to poison the
food in a restaurant. The contamination was successfully detected in the dairy, while two
died and more than 40 were injured in the second case.
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you consent to our use of cookies
Learn more. Got it!
Yet another potential threat is posed by vehicle-borne improvised explosive devices,
followed immediately by gun and knife attacks, which have occurred on multiple
occasions in Africa and the Middle East. Those specific kinds of phased attacks, starting
with an improvised explosive device, could eventually occur in Europe and the U.S.
Adding to the potential problems, FBI Director Christopher Wray recently told Congress
that terrorist groups would like to use drones to attack in the U.S., predicting the
probability as being “imminent.” This threat will only increase as drones improve.
Eventually, someone or some group will drop an explosive device, either on people or on
infrastructure. That kind of attack will be a game changer on many levels. Well-placed,
the results could be catastrophic.
Given the difficulty of predicting what an “event” could look like, how is a food
corporation to be prepared? I’ve put together a few suggestions to achieve this aim:
• Design vetting programs for all new employees that include a police background check
as a requirement for employment.
Robert A. Norton, Ph.D., is chair of the Auburn University Food System Institute’s
Food and Water Defense Working Group (aufsi.auburn.edu/fooddefense). He is a long-
time consultant to the U.S. military and federal and state law enforcement agencies
and is editor of Bob Norton’s Food Defense Blog (aufsi.auburn.edu/fooddefense/blog/).
He can be reached at nortora@auburn.edu or at 334.844.7562.