Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Poet of The Medieval Modern Reading The Early Medieval Library With David Jones Francesca Brooks All Chapter
Poet of The Medieval Modern Reading The Early Medieval Library With David Jones Francesca Brooks All Chapter
F R A N C E S C A BR O O K S
1
3
Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, ,
United Kingdom
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.
It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship,
and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of
Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries
© Francesca Brooks
The moral rights of the author have been asserted
First Edition published in
Impression:
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in
a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the
prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted
by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics
rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the
above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the
address above
You must not circulate this work in any other form
and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer
Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press
Madison Avenue, New York, NY , United States of America
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
Data available
Library of Congress Control Number:
ISBN –––– (hbk.)
ISBN –––– (pbk.)
DOI: ./oso/..
Printed and bound by
CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon,
Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and
for information only. Oxford disclaims any responsibility for the materials
contained in any third party website referenced in this work.
S E R I E S E D I T O R ’S P R E F A CE
This book began its life as a research project funded by the London Arts
and Humanities Partnership and the Arts and Humanities Research
Council, without whose support it would not have been possible.
I could not have embarked on this project without the mentorship of
Clare A. Lees and Joshua Davies, who, along with Sarah Salih and the
medievalist community at King’s College London more broadly, fos-
tered a research culture that was open, collaborative, and incredibly
inspiring. I am grateful for the advice and encouragement of the Early
Career Research Forum in the Centre for Late Antique and Medieval
Studies, who offered feedback on an early draft of this book, and
especially for my friends and collaborators Fran Allfrey, Charlotte
Rudman, Bethany Whalley, Charlotte Knight, and Carl Kears. I hope
that I will always be able to count them amongst my friends and
colleagues: the field of Medieval Studies will be richer for them. Much
of the editing process took place in the margins of a teaching post at
University College London, where I was sustained and inspired by my
colleagues, especially Xine Yao, Susan Irvine, Natalie Jones, Ezra Hor-
bury, and Rachel Holmes. I owe the greatest debt here to my students,
who challenged me during this time to continually think in new ways
and to be a better, more critical thinker and writer.
I am grateful for the generosity and dedication of the archivists,
librarians, and curators at the National Library of Wales (Llyfrgell
Genedlaethol Cymru), the Tate Gallery Archives, Camberwell College
of Arts, The Ditchling Museum of Art and Crafts, Thomas Fisher Rare
Book Library, the Georgetown University Booth Family Center for
Special Collections, and the Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript
Library, particularly to Jennifer Toews at the Thomas Fisher and
Adrienne Sharpe at the Beinecke for transatlantic scans of documents
I realized were important when I was already halfway back across the
world. I am also grateful for permission to reproduce extracts from
David Jones’s published works, unpublished manuscripts and corres-
pondence, as well as images of some of his artworks, from Faber and
Faber Ltd, Bridgeman Images, The David Jones Society, and above all
from The Estate of David Jones. Funds from the Leverhulme Trust
viii |
and the Leavis Fund at the University of York have made the repro-
duction of text and image in this book possible. Thanks also must go
to Greg Walker, Elaine Treharne, Aimee Wright, Jayaprakash P., Ian
Brookes, and the anonymous reviewers, who have all helped to make
this a better book.
Special mention must be made of the Facebook group venator for-
marum: the David Jones exchange; I am also thankful for words of
wisdom, warmth, and support from fellow David Jones scholars and
enthusiasts including Hilary Davies, Kathleen Henderson Staudt, Paul
Robichaud, Tom Goldpaugh, Anne Price-Owen, Bradford Haas, and
Anna Svendsen, amongst many others. I am indebted to all those who
have taught and mentored me throughout my development as a
researcher, especially to Virginia Langum, who gave me the idea that
I might one day become a medievalist, to Leo Mellor, who first pointed
me in the direction of David Jones, and to Chris Jones and Elaine
Treharne, who have made navigating the first few years after my PhD
feel full of possibility and potential.
To my variations on a theme Rebecca, Natalie, Cat, Sophie, and
especially Michaela, my superstar proofreader, thank you for more
than a decade of love and friendship. I could not have asked for better
friends throughout this process than Charlotte and James, who have
continually raised me up—they really are the dream team. Thanks also
to my Nanny Bobby, Grandpa Colin, and aunts Sue and Sally, whose
love and support has taught me not to be shy of ambition. To my
Grandma Patty, who, as well as sharing bottles of Prosecco and family
histories with me on my way to and from the archives in Aberystwyth,
has always cheered my successes. To my mum and dad, Gini and Sam,
to whom I owe so much I do not know how to begin—thank you for
your endless support and encouragement; it has made all of this
possible. Finally, this book is for Brian, who knows what his love,
partnership, and wisdom mean to me.
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
Table
. Table of Old English words and compounds from Henry
Sweet’s Anglo-Saxon Reader found in The Anathemata.
Source: Author’s own
Figures
. David Jones reading. Still photograph from the Mabon
Studio film of David Jones, Calvary Nursing Home, Harrow,
. With thanks to Anne Price-Owen, Jasmine
Hunter-Evans, and the David Jones Society
. Exiit Edictum, , inscription in opaque and watercolours,
. cm, Tate Gallery, London. Photo © Tate.
By permission of the David Jones Estate/Bridgeman Images
. Notes in the flyleaf of Collingwood and Myres, Roman
Britain and the English Settlements (NLW ). Reproduced
with permission of the Licensor through PLSclear. Scan
© Llyfrgell Genedlaethol Cymru/National Library of Wales
. An example of Jones sight-reading Old English from
Benjamin Thorpe’s Analecta Anglo-Saxonica (NLW ).
Scan © Llyfrgell Genedlaethol Cymru/National Library
of Wales
. Manuscript page from the Pastoral Care sent by King
Alfred to Worcester, reproduced in Hodgkin, A History
of the Anglo-Saxons (NLW ). Scan © Llyfrgell
Genedlaethol Cymru/National Library of Wales
. Press-cutting found between the pages of Thorpe,
Analecta Anglo-Saxonica (NLW ). Scan © Llyfrgell
Genedlaethol Cymru/National Library of Wales
. St Gregory and the Slaves, , watercolour, cm,
Ditchling Museum of Art and Craft, Ditchling. Photo
© Sam Moore. By permission of the David Jones
Estate/Bridgeman Images
xviii |
1
The Times, correspondence pages, November– November . Accessed via
Gale News Vault <https://www.gale.com/intl/primary-sources/historical-newspapers>
[accessed: ..]. All subsequent references to The Times in this introduction were
accessed via Gale News Vault.
2
The Times, editorials/leaders: ‘Dons Battle over Anglo-Saxon’, November ; ‘Is
Beowulf Really Necessary?’, November .
3
School teachers and even the novelist Bryher, who had written a novel titled
Beowulf: A Novel, also contributed to the debate along with members of the general
Poet of the Medieval Modern: Reading the Early Medieval Library with David Jones. Francesca Brooks,
Oxford University Press. © Francesca Brooks 2021. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198860136.003.0001
|
public. Dorothy Whitelock, ‘Is Beowulf Needed’, and Peter Clemoes, ‘Prose and Poetry?’,
The Times, November , correspondence pages; J. Dover Wilson, ‘Is Beowulf
Needed?’, and Rosemary Woolf, ‘Vernacular Literature’, The Times, November ,
correspondence pages; J. N. L. Myres, ‘Sound Grounding’, The Times, November ,
correspondence pages.
4
‘Beowulf the Conqueror’, The Times, November , editorials/leaders.
5
‘Beowulf the Conqueror’.
6
TGA, /, unpublished letter to E. C. Hodgkin, November .
7
Letter to Colin Wilcockson, December , published in Colin Wilcockson,
‘Notes on Some Letters of David Jones’, in Agenda, (), –.
|
8
TGA, /, unpublished letter to E. C. Hodgkin, November . Jones made
the same comparison of the position of Welsh and Old English tradition in an undated
essay published posthumously as ‘On the Difficulties of One Writer of Welsh Affinity
Whose Language is English’, in The Dying Gaul and Other Writings (London: Faber and
Faber, ), pp. –.
9
Seamus Heaney, ‘Translator’s Introduction’, in Beowulf: A Verse Translation, ed.
Daniel Donoghue (London: Norton, ), pp. xxiii–xxxviii (p. xxxviii).
10
David Jones, The Anathemata: Fragments of an Attempted Writing (Padstow: Faber
and Faber, []). Subsequent references to The Anathemata will be cited parenthet-
ically within the text. On ‘late modernism’, see: Tyrus Miller, Late Modernism: Politics,
|
material from the early medieval English tradition will illuminate the
political implications of Jones’s construction of Anglo-Welsh and
Catholic identities in The Anathemata, presenting the poem as a
challenge to nationally charged representations of early medieval
Britain across the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. At a time when
the Middle Ages are increasingly weaponized in far-right political
discourse and the future of the United Kingdom is threatened by Brexit,
this study examines how the early medieval past has been resourced to
both shore up and challenge English hegemonies across British culture
and asks how one Anglo-Welsh poet tried to re-envision this dynamic.
A note on terminology becomes necessary here. Over the course of
the past few years, the field of Early Medieval Studies has begun to
acknowledge the racialized, racist, and nationalist implications of the
term ‘Anglo-Saxon’ and the active violence that clinging to this ter-
minology can do in our work as scholars, teachers, and public academ-
ics. A significant element of this work has involved recognition of the
fact that the process of, as Mary Dockray-Miller writes, freighting
‘Anglo-Saxon’ with racialized ‘assumptions of privilege and superiority’
is not just a problem that happens ‘out there’ on, for example, far-right
white nationalist web forums, but has been central to the disciplinary
construction of ‘Anglo-Saxon Studies’ throughout its history.11 As
Cord J. Whitaker and Matthew Gabriele affirm, ‘it is clearer than ever
that the ghosts of scholarly racism and imperialism also have the
potential to haunt the future of medieval studies’.12 Work by scholars
such as Sierra Lomuto and Mary Rambaran-Olm has been key here to
raising public and academic awareness.13 In this book I assert my
Fiction, and the Arts Between the World Wars (Berkeley: University of California Press,
); Thomas S. Davis, ‘Late Modernism: British Literature at Midcentury’, Literature
Compass, (), –; and Leo Mellor, ‘The s, the Second World War and Late
Modernism’, in The Cambridge History of Modernism, ed. Vincent Sherry (Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, ), pp. –.
11
Mary Dockray-Miller, ‘Old English has a serious image problem’, Arts &
Culture Daily, May <https://daily.jstor.org/old-english-serious-image-problem/>
[accessed: ..].
12
Cord J. Whitaker and Matthew Gabriele, ‘Mountain haints: Towards a Medieval
Studies exorcized’, postmedieval, (), –.
13
Sierra Lomuto, ‘White Nationalism and the Ethics of Medieval Studies’, In the Middle,
December <http://www.inthemedievalmiddle.com///white-nationalism-and-
|
17
Alexander Nagel, Medieval Modern: Art Out of Time (London: Thames and
Hudson, ), p. .
18
Nagel introduces his book with an epigraph from Walter Benjamin’s ‘On the
Concept of History’.
19
Robert Mills, Derek Jarman’s Medieval Modern (Woodbridge: Boydell and Brewer,
), p. .
20
Basil Bunting, Basil Bunting on Poetry, ed. Peter Makin (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins
University Press, ), p. .
21
David Jones, ‘The Roland Epic and Ourselves’, in The Dying Gaul and Other
Writings (London: Faber and Faber, ), pp. – (p. ).
|
22
Joshua Davies, Visions and Ruins: Cultural Memory and the Untimely Middle Ages
(Manchester: Manchester University Press, ), p. .
23
Jones converted to Catholicism in and his faith was an essential part of his
identity as an artist. See, for example, ‘Art and Sacrament’, in Epoch and Artist: Selected
Writings by David Jones, ed. Harman Grisewood (London: Faber and Faber, ),
pp. –, originally published as ‘Art and Sacrament: An Enquiry’, in Catholic Approaches,
ed. E. Pakenham (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, ), pp. –.
24
The concept of anamnesis was central to Jones’s sacramental poetics and it informed
his sense of the vital presence of the past in the present. In a note in The Anathemata
Jones wrote: ‘Anamnesis. I take leave to remind the reader that this is a key-word in our
deposits. The dictionary defines its general meaning as “the recalling of things past”. But
what is the nature of this particular recalling? I append the following quotation as being
clear and to the point: “It (anamnesis) is not quite easy to represent accurately in English,
words like “remembrance” or ‘memorial’ having for us a connotation of something absent
which is only mentally recollected. But in the Scriptures of both the Old and New
Testament anamnesis and the cognate verb have a sense of ‘recalling’ or ‘re-presenting’
before God an event in the past so that it becomes here and now operative by its effects.”
Gregory Dix, The Shape of the Liturgy, p. .’ (, n. ).
|
the Old English poem Beowulf, while in Faber and Faber had
published the Argentinian-born Welsh poet Lynette Roberts’s sequence
Gods with Stainless Ears: A Heroic Poem, redolent with early medieval
Welsh literary references, saints, and ruins. Although all three poems
wear their relation to contemporary events and politics with varying
degrees of consciousness and force, taken together they suggest the
particular resonance of the early Middle Ages for the battlegrounds and
bombsites of the Second World War and its aftermath in late modernist
culture. This mid-century moment does not stand alone, however, and
neither does Jones’s work as a medieval modernist within the broader
arc of the century. A line of influence can be drawn, for example, from
the Anglican medievalism of Jones’s friend and editor at Faber and
Faber, T. S. Eliot, through Jones’s work, and to that of later poets such
as Geoffrey Hill, whose Mercian Hymns () reimagines the eighth-
century King Offa as ‘overlord of the M’, and Seamus Heaney, who
recognized that ‘as a poet of Christ’s passion and incarnation’ David
Jones’s lineage went ‘suddenly past Hopkins to the Anglo-Saxon Dream
of the Rood’.25 Despite the fact that Jones is frequently namechecked in
studies that explore this twentieth-century tradition of medievalism, he
is rarely one of their subjects. However, as the connections detailed
above suggest, Jones’s work did have a profound impact on twentieth-
century poetry in Britain and Ireland and his influence continues to be
felt today in the work of poets and writers such as Pauline Stainer,
Robin Robertson, and Max Porter.
Here, it is worth saying something briefly about Jones’s engagement
with Old English as ‘play’ in both the radical, modernist, and the
sacramental sense. Throughout this book I discuss Jones’s engagement
with Old English language, texts, and artefacts in terms of play. This
arises partly out of an understanding, which has grown during my
25
Seamus Heaney, ‘Now and in England’, The Spectator, May , . For further
discussion of the relationship between Jones’s poetry and that of Eliot and Hill, see, for
example, Steven Matthews, ‘Provincialism and the Modern Diaspora: T. S. Eliot and
David Jones’, English, (), –; Steven Matthews, ‘ “Felt Unities”: Geoffrey Hill,
T. S. Eliot and David Jones’, Literary Imagination, (), –. I am indebted to
Anna Johnson’s ‘ “Wounded Men and wounded trees”: David Jones and the Anglo-Saxon
Culture Tangle’, in Anglo-Saxon Culture and the Modern Imagination, ed. David Clark
and Nicholas Perkins (Cambridge: Brewer, ), pp. – for introducing me to
Seamus Heaney’s Spectator article on David Jones.
|
archival research, of the extent of Jones’s passion for languages and for
linguistics, but it is also an acknowledgement of Jones’s considerable
debt to the writings of Joyce. In a letter to Harman Grisewood
Jones wrote that ‘[w]hat I don’t understand is why more has not been
done with this language thing—why are there not a whole lot of
leaders—up-to-&-from-Joyce—I mean the pleasure is endless & the
possibilities infinite’.26 These pleasures and possibilities can certainly be
felt in Jones’s engagement with Old English. Indeed, Jones reveals as
much in his ‘Preface’ to The Anathemata when he associates the ‘word-
hoard’, the Old English compound for a poetic store of words, with
instruction in play: ‘names linger, especially when associated with some
sort of disciplina ludi. They go into your word-hoard, whether or no
you ever attempt to unlock it’ (). However, Jones’s play with language
is not merely frivolous but informed by a belief in the evocative power
of words. In his essay ‘Art and Sacrament’ Jones discussed the collo-
quial appreciation of the arts by people as ‘fun’, linking it to the
‘gratuitous’ quality of ars that he believed was inherent in the sacra-
mental work of art:
We can better appreciate the nature of this kind of ‘fun’ or ‘play’
when it is Holy Wisdom herself who says ludo. In the famous passage
in the Book of Proverbs she is made to say ludens in orbe terrarum.
She was with the Logos when all things were formed, ‘playing before
him at all times’ and as the Knox translation puts it: ‘I made play in
this world of dust, with the sons of Adam for my play-fellows.’27
For Jones play is an artistic and spiritual mode of perception that leads
to a deeper knowledge of the thing engaged with. To play with the past
is to create and recreate or, in Jones’s sacramental sense, to ‘make this
thing other’ (The Ana, ), and in doing so to ask fundamental ques-
tions about the nature of history and Christian being.
Although Jones’s account of the First World War, In Parenthesis
(), is the best known of his poetic works, The Anathemata repre-
sents the central work in Jones’s oeuvre as poet and artist.28 Most
26
BRBML, GEN MSS , Box , unpublished letter to Grisewood, March
[GUBFC, GTM-GAMMS, Box , ].
27
Jones, ‘Art and Sacrament’, p. .
28
Over the past few years David Jones has garnered greater prominence in public and
critical consciousness. This has been, in part, due to the centenary commemorations of
|
the First World War with In Parenthesis representing an obvious focus. In , for
example, Faber and Faber republished In Parenthesis as part of its commemorative ‘Poets
of the Great War’ editions, alongside works by Siegfried Sassoon, Robert Graves, Edward
Thomas, and others, in what Faber described as ‘an essential gathering of our most
beloved war poets’—a significant inclusion given that Jones has been frequently excluded
from First World War anthologies. ‘In Parenthesis’ <https://www.faber.co.uk/
-in-parenthesis.html> [accessed: ..].
29
In Parenthesis (London: Faber and Faber, []), pp. –; ‘The Fatigue’, in
The Sleeping Lord and Other Fragments (London: Faber and Faber, []),
pp. –; The Roman Quarry and Other Sequences, ed. Harman Grisewood and René
Hague (London: Agenda Editions, ); Wedding Poems, ed. Thomas Dilworth (Lon-
don: Enitharmon, ); David Jones’s The Grail Mass and Other Works, ed. Thomas
Goldpaugh and Jamie Callison (London: Bloomsbury, ).
30
In his essay ‘Autobiographical Talk’, Jones discusses the difficulties involved in the
‘making of a writing’. Epoch and Artist, pp. – (p. ).
|
between and ’, which were then ‘reshuffled and again
rewritten intermittently between and ’ (–), with the
earliest of the reproduced artistic works dating from .31 In addition
to being the labour of several decades, The Anathemata’s themes and
ambitions continued to consume Jones’s later writing. As the editors of
posthumous collections of Jones’s poetry have noted—René Hague and
Harman Grisewood, and more recently Tom Goldpaugh and Jamie
Callison—the majority of the poems and drafts written and published
after were Mass poems that emerged from materials and drafts
discarded or begun during the writing of The Anathemata.32 With this
in mind, this book often draws on Jones’s later poetry, essays, and
correspondence in which Jones is revising and reflecting on his earlier
work and thought to elucidate The Anathemata. In particular, a group
of letters and typescripts sent to Hague in and now held in the
archive at the Thomas Fisher Rare Book Library, Toronto, have been
especially fruitful.33 In Hague was writing his A Commentary on
The Anathemata of David Jones, a detailed page-by-page study of the
allusions and references that contribute to the poem’s dense intertext-
uality.34 Hague was writing the book during the last eighteen months of
Jones’s life, but Jones sent many detailed letters expounding his work
and even read and responded to Hague’s draft manuscripts, providing
an invaluable gloss on this complex and at times obscure poetic history
of Britain.
Chronologically speaking, as he admitted in his ‘Preface’ to his
collected essays Epoch and Artist, Jones was an artist before he was a
writer.35 However, he came to think of himself as a ‘maker’ with all
31
On the relationship between The Anathemata and World War II, see: Neil
Corcoran, The Song of Deeds: A Study of The Anathemata of David Jones (Cardiff:
University of Wales Press, ), p. ; Leo Mellor, Reading the Ruins: Modernism,
Bombsites and British Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ),
pp. –.
32
Hague and Grisewood, ‘Introduction’, in The Roman Quarry, pp. xiii–xiv. Gold-
paugh and Callison, p. .
33
TFRBL, MS Coll , Box and Box .
34
René Hague, A Commentary on The Anathemata of David Jones (Wellingborough:
Christopher Skelton, ).
35
See Jones’s discussion of the interrelated nature of his visual and verbal processes of
creation in ‘Preface by the Author’, Epoch and Artist, pp. – (p. ).
|
36
See Jones, ‘Art and Sacrament’, Epoch and Artist, pp. – (p. ).
37
‘Poiesis’ is the Ancient Greek philosophical term for ‘the activity in which a person
brings something into being that did not exist before’. See Jones, ‘Preface by the Author’,
p. .
38
See Nicolete Gray, The Painted Inscriptions of David Jones (London: Gordon Fraser,
). For more recent work on the painted inscriptions, see ‘Word and Image’, in Ariane
Bankes and Paul Hills, The Art of David Jones: Vision and Memory (Farnham: Lund
Humphries, ), pp. – and Elizabeth Powell, David Jones and the Craft of
Theology: Becoming Beauty (London: Bloomsbury Academic, ).
39
Gray, The Painted Inscriptions, p. .
|
40
Gray, The Painted Inscriptions, p. . Elsewhere Gray described the inscriptions as
‘visual poems’: Nicolete Gray, Lettering as Drawing: The Moving Line (London: Oxford
University Press, ), p. . On other visual techniques that may have influenced
Jones’s poetic composition, see Thomas Dilworth, ‘The Deluge: Engraving the Modern
Long Poem’, Journal of Modern Literature, (), –.
41
Jones’s work has been at the centre of a recent debate about the relationship between
Catholicism and modernism. See, for example: Adam Schwartz, The Third Spring:
G. K. Chesterton, Graham Greene, Christopher Dawson, and David Jones (Washington,
D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, ); Erik Tonning, Modernism and
Christianity (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, ); and Jamie Callison, Paul Fiddes,
Anna Johnson, and Erik Tonning, eds., David Jones: A Christian Modernist? (Leiden: Brill,
).
42
On Jones’s sacramental poetics, see, for example: Kathleen Henderson Staudt, At the
Turn of a Civilization: David Jones and Modern Poetics (Ann Arbor: University of
Michigan Press, ); W. David Soud, Divine Cartographies: God, History and Poiesis
in W. B. Yeats, David Jones and T. S. Eliot (Oxford: Oxford University Press, ); Daniel
Gustaffson, ‘Saying more and making other: Poetry as Sacrament’, in Callison, Fiddes,
Johnson, and Tonning, pp. –.
43
Nicolete Gray, ‘David Jones –’, in David Jones: Inscriptions (London:
Anthony D’Offay, ) [n.p.].
|
44
See further: Elizabeth Ward, David Jones: Mythmaker (Manchester: Manchester
University Press, ), and Tom Villis, British Catholics and Fascism: Religious Identity
and Political Extremism between the Wars (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, ).
45
Jed Esty, A Shrinking Island: Modernism and National Culture in England
(Princeton: Princeton University Press, ), and Marina MacKay, Late Modernism
and World War II (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ).
46
Thomas Dilworth, The Shape of Meaning in the Poetry of David Jones (Toronto:
University of Toronto Press, ), p. .
47
David Blamires, ‘The Medieval Inspiration of David Jones’, in David Jones: Eight
Essays on his Work as Writer and Artist, being the first transactions of Yr Academi
Gymreig, ed. Roland Mathias (Llandysul: Gomer Press, ), pp. –. I am also
|
immensely grateful for the archival work of Huw Ceiriog Jones and his catalogue of The
Library; without it my own research would not have been possible: Huw Ceiriog Jones,
The Library of David Jones (–): A Catalogue (Aberystwyth: The National Library
of Wales, ).
48
Jonathan Miles, Backgrounds to David Jones: A Study in Sources and Drafts (Cardiff:
University of Wales Press, ).
49
See Michael Alexander, who repeats Jones’s claim that he ‘did not know any Anglo-
Saxon’: ‘From “David Jones” ’, in David Jones: Man and Poet, ed. John Matthias (Orono:
National Poetry Foundation, University of Maine, ), pp. – (p. ).
|
50
Paul Robichaud, Making the Past Present: David Jones, the Middle Ages and
Modernism (Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, ),
pp. –. There is also an unpublished PhD thesis by Kirsty Louise Black, which is
primarily focused on high and late medieval contexts: ‘ “Those been the cokkes wordes
and not myne”: Medieval Influences on the Structure of David Jones’s The Anathemata’
(unpublished doctoral thesis, Goldsmiths University, London, ).
51
Robichaud does engage with ‘Angle-Land’, the sequence neglected by Miles, and
discusses Jones’s engagement with the Mercian Saint Guthlac as well as his use of the Old
English language (see further Chapter ) pp. –, and he deals briefly with Jones’s
interest in The Dream of the Rood, pp. –. His conclusion usefully sets Jones’s
medievalism within the context of figures such as Geoffrey Hill and Seamus Heaney,
who are better known for their engagement with Old English materials. Making the Past
Present.
52
Anna Johnson, ‘ “Wounded men and wounded trees”: David Jones and the Anglo-
Saxon Culture Tangle’, in Anglo-Saxon Culture and the Modern Imagination, ed. David
Clark and Nicholas Perkins (Cambridge: Brewer, ), pp. –.
53
Johnson, p. .
|
54
Bankes and Hills; Thomas Dilworth, David Jones: Engraver, Soldier, Painter, Poet
(London: Jonathan Cape, ); Thomas Berenato, Anne Price-Owen, and Kathleen
Henderson Staudt, eds., David Jones on Religion, Politics and Culture (London:
Bloomsbury, ); Goldpaugh and Callison, The Grail Mass and Other Works; ‘David
Jones Special Issue’, ed. Jasmine Hunter-Evans and Anna Svendsen, Religion and Litera-
ture, (); Jamie Callison, Paul Fiddes, Anna Johnson, and Erik Tonning, eds., David
Jones: A Christian Modernist? (Leiden: Brill, ). Monographs that have devoted
chapters to Jones include: Stephen McInerney, The Enclosure of an Open Mystery:
Sacrament and Incarnation in the Writings of Gerard Manley Hopkins, David Jones and
Les Murray (Bern: Peter Lang, ); Heather O’Donoghue, English Poetry and Old Norse
Myth: A History (Oxford: Oxford University Press, ); and, Soud.
55
Elaine Treharne, ‘Naming the Western Fringes’, unpublished paper given at ISAS:
International Society of Anglo-Saxonists Eighteenth Biennial Meeting, University of
Hawai’i at Manoa, July . Treharne’s research on Jones will form part of her
forthcoming book, The Aesthetic Book: Arts and Crafts to Modernism. I should also note
here that David Jones has been mentioned in several recent publications on medievalism:
Chris Jones describes Jones as part of a ‘modernist medievalism’ in ‘Medievalism in
British Poetry’, in The Cambridge Companion to Medievalism, ed. Louise D’Arcens
(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ), pp. – (p. ); and David Matthews
discusses Jones’s ‘The Quest’ in similar terms in Medievalism: A Critical History (Cam-
bridge: Brewer, ), pp. –. On recent developments in Medievalism Studies, see, for
example: Louise D’Arcens, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Medievalism (Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, ), and Elizabeth Emery and Richard Utz, eds.,
Medievalism: Key Critical Terms (Cambridge: Brewer, ). For work on literary med-
ievalisms over the past few decades see, for example: Chris Jones, Strange Likeness: The
Use of Old English in Twentieth-Century Poetry (Oxford: Oxford University Press, );
M. J. Toswell, Borges the Unacknowledged Medievalist: Old English and Old Norse in his
Life and Work (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, ); Tom Birkett and Kirsty March-
Lyons, eds., Translating Early Medieval Poetry: Transformation, Reception, Interpretation
(Cambridge: Brewer, ); Joshua Davies, Visions and Ruins.
|
56
For details of the acquisition, see Adrodiadd Blynyddol/Annual Report –
(Aberystwyth: National Library of Wales, ), p. . See also, Huw Ceiriog Jones. It
is clear from much of the correspondence from GUBFC, GTM-GAMMS, Box , that
the motivation for the preservation of The Library came from the National Library of
Wales itself, where the librarian, David Jenkins, had shown an interest in the acquisition
of The Library, alongside Jones’s other manuscripts and papers, even while Jones was
alive. See, for example, GUBFC, GTM-GAMMS, Box , , unpublished letter from
Saunders Lewis to Grisewood, December .
57
Joseph Nicholson, ‘Making Personal Libraries More Public: A Study of the
Technical Processing of Personal Libraries in ARL Institutions’, RBM, (),
– (p. ).
58
Hereafter, The Anglo-Saxon Library will be used to refer to this subsection of The
Library of David Jones I have identified in my research.
|
59
Dilworth, Engraver, Soldier, Painter, Poet, p. .
60
John Goodby and Chris Wigginton, ‘Welsh Modernist Poetry’, in Regional
Modernisms, ed. Neal Alexander and James Moran (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University
Press, ), pp. – (p. ).
|
of Wales, and it was Welsh National Opera that staged and toured the
libretto of In Parenthesis in .61
However, Jones’s apparent legacy as a Welsh cultural figure leaves us
in danger of placing too much emphasis upon the poet–artist’s
imaginative longing and nostalgic hiraeth—the Welsh word that is
without cognate in English, which expresses something akin to, but
deeper than, homesickness—for Wales without acknowledging the
particular power of his more local contexts.62 In this sense, Ariane
Bankes and Paul Hills’s retrospective of Jones’s visual work,
‘Vision and Memory’, did subtle but insightful work in reminding us
of the London and Sussex contexts that informed Jones’s vision.63 The
inverse of this argument, that Jones should be considered an English
poet and artist, is nevertheless equally problematic. When introducing
Dai Greatcoat: A Self-Portrait of David Jones in his Letters, René Hague,
Jones’s friend and editor, made the claim that Jones belonged wholly to
the English tradition: ‘[i]n spite of all David’s attempts to Cambrianize
his work [. . .] it was the English tradition that was most completely
assimilated, and everything in his work that is most convincing, sincere,
and based on real knowledge and understanding is English’.64 Hague’s
position establishes a dichotomy between ‘Englishness’ and ‘Welshness’
that leaves no room for nuance; indeed, Hague reinforces a perspective
61
In the summer of , Welsh National Opera premiered a new libretto based on In
Parenthesis written by Emma Jenkins and David Antrobus and with music by the young
British composer Iain Bell. The libretto was commissioned by the Nicholas John Trust
with – NOW, the UK’s arts programme for the First World War Centenary. The
libretto premiered at the Wales Millennium Centre, Cardiff ( May– June), and toured
to the Birmingham Hippodrome ( June) and the Royal Opera House, London (
June– July). ‘In Parenthesis’, WNO <http://inparenthesis.org.uk> [accessed: ..].
62
‘hiraeth’, in GPC <https://geiriadur.uwtsd.ac.uk> [accessed: ..].
63
‘David Jones: Vision and Memory’, Pallant House Gallery, October –
February <http://pallant.org.uk/exhibitions/past-exhibitions//david-jones-
vision-and-memory/david-jones-vision-and-memory> [accessed: ..].
64
René Hague, ed., Dai Greatcoat: A Self-Portrait of David Jones in his Letters
(London: Faber and Faber, ), p. . Hague was not alone in espousing this dichot-
omy: in his Welsh-language foreword to a exhibition catalogue, Saunders Lewis
wrote that Jones ‘feeds his meditation and his imagination on the Welsh past; it is a key to
his work as English poet and as painter’ [Mae’n meithrin ei fyfyrdod a’I ddychymyg ar
orffennol Cymru a dyna un allwedd i’w waith eff el bardd Saesneg a pheintiwr.]. ‘Note by
Way of Preface’, in David Jones: An Exhibition of Paintings, Drawings and Engravings
(Cardiff: The Arts Council of Great Britain, ), pp. –.
|
that is entirely at odds with Jones’s own sense of the entangled nature of
British traditions.
Roland Mathias points out that what Hague is introducing here is a
selective ‘portrait based on letters to English friends’, suggesting that the
‘Welsh enthusiasms have been editorially shaded out’.65 Yet, Hague’s
assertion has been frequently reinstated by the many critics who have
argued that Jones’s Welshness represents an imagined experience of
landscape, culture, and language that is fixed in the Welsh past. Jeremy
Hooker, for example, describes Jones’s relationship to Wales as ‘tan-
gential’ and suggests that this might explain the ‘persistent tendency to
resolve the Welsh landscape and Welsh communities into “the Other
World” ’.66 Dilworth, in his recent biography, reinforces this argument
by describing Jones’s Welshness as an ‘intellectual-imaginary’ that is
‘figured against a London-English social-cultural ground’.67 It is true
that Jones is often imaginatively inhabiting Wales, Welsh landscape,
and Welsh history from the physical spaces of England. Indeed, Jones
spent relatively little time in Wales: there were several childhood visits
to his grandparents in North Wales, and from to Jones spent
periods of time staying with Eric Gill and his family in Capel-y-ffin in
the Brecon Beacons, and made trips from here to Caldey Island.68
Jones’s experience as a private in the Royal Welch Fusiliers during
the First World War was no doubt also important in shaping his
experience of Welsh culture at a distance from Wales.69 However,
this need not be seen as an inauthentic, or purely imagined, experience
of Welshness.
65
Hague, Dai Greatcoat, p. .
66
Jeremy Hooker, John Cowper Powys and David Jones: A Comparative Study
(London: Enitharmon Press, ), p. . In a chapter, Hooker would go on to
admit that it is not ‘easy to dismiss Jones’s idea of Wales as a romantic dream’, suggesting
that Jones had something important to say about ‘the complex situation of the modern
Anglo-Welsh writer, a situation brought about by the social and economic pressures
behind Anglicization in his father’s generation’. Jeremy Hooker, ‘David Jones and the
Matter of Wales’, in David Jones, Diversity in Unity: Studies of his Literary and Visual Art,
ed. Belinda Humfrey and Anne Price-Owen (Cardiff: University of Wales Press, ),
pp. – (p. ).
67
Dilworth, Engraver, Soldier, Painter, Poet, p. .
68
See Roland Mathias’s full catalogue of Jones’s visits to Wales in A Ride Through the
Wood: Essays on Anglo-Welsh Literature (Bridgend: Poetry Wales Press, ), p. .
69
See also William Blissett, ‘The Welsh Thing in Here’, in David Jones: Artist and Poet,
ed. Paul Hills (Aldershot: Scolar Press, ), pp. – (pp. –).
|
70
In a talk broadcast by the BBC Welsh Home Service, Jones began by introducing himself
as ‘one whose father was a Welshman’ and went on to say that his subject is ‘the matter of
Wales as seen by a Londoner’. ‘A London Artist Looks at Contemporary Wales’, in The Dying
Gaul, pp. – (p. ), originally broadcast on the Welsh Home Service of the BBC.
71
See, for example: Neil Evans, ‘Internal Colonialism? Colonization, Economic
Development and Political Mobilisation in Wales, Scotland and Ireland’, in G. Day and
G. Rees, eds., Regions, Nations and European Integration: Remaking the Celtic Periphery
(Cardiff: University of Wales Press, ), pp. – (p. ). However, more recently
critics have begun to explore meaningful ways of applying postcolonial theory to Welsh
history and contemporary culture; see: Kirsti Bohata, Postcolonialism Revisited: Writing
Wales in English (Cardiff: University of Wales Press, ); Jane Aaron and Chris
William, ed. Postcolonial Wales (Cardiff: University of Wales Press, ); Michael
A. Faletra, Wales and the Medieval Colonial Imagination: The Matters of Britain in the
Twelfth Century (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, ).
72
Jones, ‘The Sleeping Lord’, in The Sleeping Lord, p. .
|
Jones wrote that ‘[i]n my text the name “Loidis” must be taken
symbolically of any pocket of resistance in times of confused and
shifting frontiers [. . .]’ (, n. ). Loidis comes to represent Jones’s
faith in the mobility of identity, but more importantly his belief in the
survival and resistance of the Welsh across Britain. As Jones consist-
ently reminds his readers, ‘what’s under works up’ (The Ana, ). The
history of areas like the Welsh marches and early kingdoms such as
Loidis mean that Wales is as much of a presence in England as England
is in Wales: both countries are inhabited by culturally composite
communities as a result of their colonial and colonized histories. To
be Anglo-Welsh, or as Jones prefers to put it in his ‘Preface’ to The
Anathemata ‘a Londoner, of Welsh and English parentage’ (), there-
fore, can provide insight into the sociopolitical, cultural, and geo-
graphic dynamic between England and Wales that has existed in
some form for more than fifteen hundred years.
In his BBC broadcast on the Welsh Home Service, Jones began
his ‘Autobiographical Talk’ by speaking about how the defeat by the Welsh
Owain Gwynedd of Henry II’s Anglo-Norman and Welsh forces at the
Battle of Ewloe (Coleshill) in was responsible for his Anglo-Welsh
affinities.73 Jones explains that:
Holywell, where my father, James Jones, was born, is about three
miles north-west of the battle-site. The birth of a son to John Jones,
Plastrwr, Treffynnon, in would indeed seem a matter of no
apparent connection with the battle won by the great Owain Gwyn-
edd in [sic]. But however unapparent, the connection is real
enough; for that victory symbolized the recovery of a tract of Britain
that had been in English possession for well over three centuries. Had
that twelfth-century recovery not occurred the area around Holywell
would have remained within the Mercian zone of influence. In which
case its inhabitants would, centuries since have become wholly Eng-
lish in tradition, nomenclature and feeling. [. . .] You see by what
close shaves some of us are what we are, and you see how accidents of
long past history can be of importance to us in the most intimate
sense, and can determine integral things about us.74
73
Jones, ‘Autobiographical Talk’, in Epoch and Artist, pp. – (p. ). Originally
broadcast on October .
74
Jones, ‘Autobiographical Talk’, in Epoch and Artist, p. .
|
75
Dilworth, Engraver, Soldier, Painter, Poet, p. .
76
‘Descriptio Kambriæ’, in Giraldi Cambrensis Itinerarium Kambriæ et Descriptio
Kambriæ, ed. James F. Dimock (London: Longmans Green, ), p. , II. VII. ‘The
Description of Wales’, in Gerald of Wales: The Journey through Wales and The Descrip-
tion of Wales, trans. Lewis Thorpe (Harmondsworth: Penguin, ), p. , Book II,
Chapter .
77
See Jones, ‘A London Artist Looks at Contemporary Wales’, in The Dying Gaul, for
Jones’s discussion of his father’s attitude to the Welsh language.
78
Dilworth, Engraver, Soldier, Painter, Poet, p. .
|
with some of the most recent studies of the Dyke, including Lindy
Brady’s Writing the Welsh Borderlands in Anglo-Saxon England and
Ian Bapty and Keith Ray’s study (), which claimed to offer a
‘revised, but not wholly revisionist’ understanding of the earthwork.79
Although Bapty and Ray agree that it is undeniable that the Dyke was
constructed in aggression against the Britons and was designed to
enforce and increase the visibility of a Mercian hegemony, they also
argue that the earthwork was conceived to ‘permit a degree of perme-
ability’ at points with a ‘connective purpose’ in mind.80 Despite the
inevitable colonial violence evident in the Dyke’s connective ambitions,
Bapty and Ray propose that it represented a frontier zone rather than a
boundary, in which some English and Welsh communities were
brought together, laying the groundwork for the development of a
‘march’: ‘a hybrid border region that rather than simply delineating a
frontier, created instead a buffer zone that was permeable when needed,
and “fixed” when needed’.81 This changing understanding of Offa’s
Dyke is part of a broader reassessment of early medieval evidence,
which increasingly emphasizes zones of cultural exchange in historio-
graphies that have been characterized by narratives of English hegem-
ony and dominance in the past.82 Jones’s own scholarly and poetic
investigation of the early medieval past, where English histories inter-
sect with Welsh histories in particular, represents a parallel shift in
perspective.
In his reading of and engagement with early medieval materials
Jones recognized what he described as the ‘culture tangle’:83 the com-
plex networks of connection, translation, and influence that produced
early medieval culture. In his unpublished essay on ‘Wales and Visual
Form’ Jones provided perhaps the best definition of what he meant by
the ‘culture tangle’:
79
Lindy Brady, Writing the Welsh Borderlands in Anglo-Saxon England (Manchester:
Manchester University Press, ); Ian Bapty and Keith Ray, Offa’s Dyke: Landscape
and Hegemony in Eighth-Century Britain (Oxford: Windgather Press, ), p. .
80
Bapty and Ray, p. .
81
Bapty and Ray, p. .
82
See, for example, Brady, especially pp. –.
83
Jones uses this phrase in his own analysis of a passage from Gerard Manley Hopkins
in ‘The Roland Epic and Ourselves’, The Dying Gaul, pp. – (p. ). I am also
thinking of Anna Johnson’s use of the phrase in the title of her chapter on Jones and the
Old English tradition, in Clark and Perkins.
|
84
Undated essay, published as ‘Wales and Visual Form’, in The Dying Gaul, pp. –
(p. ).
85
‘tangle, n.’, in OED <https://www.oed.com/> [accessed: ..].
86
Homi K. Bhabha, The Location of Culture (Oxford: Routledge, ), p. . See also
Catherine Karkov’s use of hybridity in an early medieval context in Catherine E. Karkov,
The Art of Anglo-Saxon England (Woodbridge: Boydell, ), p. .
|
87
I am well aware of the problems of ‘hybridity’ as well, particularly in a medieval
context: see, for example, Lindy Brady, p.. For the story in Bede, see Bertram Colgrave
and R. A. B. Mynors, eds., Bede’s Ecclesiastical History of the English People (Oxford:
Clarendon, ), pp. –, II..
88
Sebastian Evans, trans., Geoffrey of Monmouth (London: Dent, ) [November
] (NLW ).
89
See Stephanie Barczewski, Myth and National Identity in Nineteenth-Century
Britain: The Legends of King Arthur and Robin Hood (Oxford: Oxford University Press,
). On Victorian Anglo-Saxonism, see Matthew Townend, ‘Victorian Medievalisms’,
in The Oxford Handbook of Victorian Poetry, ed. Matthew Bevis (Oxford: Oxford
University Press, ), pp. –.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
Fig. 246.—Sepia officinalis L.,
with mantle cut away to show
position of internal shell, × ½.
(The ends of the tentacular
arms are cut off.)
The Belemnitidae are believed to have been gregarious, and to
have lived in shallow water on a muddy bottom. Specimens are
sometimes found in which even the ink-sac can be recognised in
situ. The relative proportions of rostrum and phragmocone vary
greatly in different groups, the rostrum being in some cases two feet
long, in others only just enclosing the phragmocone. As a rule the
rostrum is the only portion which has been preserved.
Fam. 3. Belosepiidae.—Phragmocone short, slightly curved,
chambers small, placed at the posterior end of a sepion, rostrum
solid, obtuse.—Eocene (Paris, Bracklesham, etc.).
Fam. 4. Belopteridae.—Sepion not known; phragmocone curved,
siphuncle on the ventral margin, rostrum well developed, pointed.
Principal genus, Spirulirostra.—Miocene of Turin.
These two families, with their small, curved phragmocone and (in
the case of the Belosepiidae) large sepion, are clearly intermediate
between the Phragmophora and Sepiophora. Some authorities place
them with the latter group.
Order Tetrabranchiata
Cephalopoda with four branchiae and four kidneys; animal
inhabiting the last chamber of an external multilocular shell; funnel
consisting of two separate lobes; tentacles numerous, without
suckers or hooks; no ink-sac.
The shell consists of two layers, the outer being porcellanous, and
the inner, as well as the walls of the chambers or septa, nacreous.
The septa vary greatly in shape. In most of the Nautiloidea they are
regularly curved, as in Nautilus, or straight, as in Orthoceras, but in
the Ammonoidea they are often exceedingly complex. The edge of
the septum, where it unites with the shell-wall, is called the suture,
and the sutural line, which is not seen until the porcellanous layer is
removed, varies in shape with the septum.
Fig. 253.—Ammonites
(Cadoceras) sublaevis
Sowb., Kellaway’s Rock,
showing the marginal
position of the siphuncle (si).
The initial chamber in Nautiloidea consists of an obtuse incurved
cone, marked on the outer surface of its posterior wall by a small
scar known as the cicatrix, which may be slit-like, round, oval, or
cruciform in shape. It has been held that the cicatrix originally
communicated with the protoconch or larval shell, which probably
dropped off as development proceeded. In the Ammonoidea, on the
other hand, there is no cicatrix, and the initial chamber probably
represents the protoconch, as seen in the nucleus of many
Gasteropoda.
Sub-order 1. Nautiloidea.—Shell straight, bent, or coiled,
aperture simple or contracted; siphuncle often narrowed by internal
deposits, position variable; septal necks short, usually directed
backwards; septa concave towards the aperture; initial chamber
conical, with a cicatrix on the posterior wall.
The Nautiloidea, of which Nautilus is the sole living
representative, date back to the Cambrian epoch, and attain their
maximum in the Silurian and Devonian. At the close of the
Palaeozoic era, every family, with the sole exceptions of the
Orthoceratidae and Nautilidae, appears to have become extinct. The
former disappear with the Trias, and after the lapse of the whole
Secondary era, Aturia, a form closely related to Nautilus, makes its
appearance.
(a) Retrosiphonata: septal necks directed backwards.
Fam. 1. Orthoceratidae.[401]—Shell straight or slightly curved,
aperture simple, body-chamber large; siphuncle cylindrical, position
variable. Single genus, Orthoceras (Fig. 254). Cambrian to Trias.
Fam. 2. Endoceratidae.—Shell straight, siphuncle wide, marginal,
septal necks produced into tubes fitting into one another. Principal
genera: Endoceras (specimens of which occur six feet long), and
Piloceras—Ordovician.
Fam. 3. Actinoceratidae.—Shell straight or slightly curved,
siphuncle wide, contracted at the septa by obstruction-rings.
Principal genera: Actinoceras, Discosorus, Huronia, Sactoceras.—
Ordovician to Carboniferous.
Fam. 4. Gomphoceratidae.—Shell globular, straight or
considerably curved, aperture narrowed, T-shaped, body-chamber
large, siphuncle variable in position. The aperture is in some cases
so narrow that probably only the arms could be protruded. Principal
genus, Gomphoceras (Fig. 255).—Silurian.
Fam. 5. Ascoceratidae.—Shell sac-like or flask-shaped, apex
truncated, unknown, body-chamber occupying nearly the whole of
the shell on the ventral side, contracting at the aperture, last few
septa coalescing on the dorsal side and encroaching upon the body-
chamber. The young form has a symmetrical shell like Orthoceras,
attached to the sac-like shell above described; as growth proceeds
the former portion is thrown off. Principal genera: Ascoceras,
Glossoceras.—Ordovician and Silurian.
Fig. 254.—A, Section of
Orthoceras, showing the
septa (s, s), and siphuncle
(si, si); B, portion of the
exterior of Orthoceras
annulatum Sowb., × ½.
(Woodwardian Museum,
Cambridge.)
Fam. 6. Poterioceratidae.—Shell fusiform, contracted at both
ends, aperture simple, siphuncle variable in position, inflated
between the septa. The form generally resembles Gomphoceras,
except for the simple aperture and fusiform shape.—Ordovician to
Carboniferous.
Fam. 7. Cyrtoceratidae.—Shell conical or sub-cylindrical, slightly
curved, body-chamber large, siphuncle variable in position. Single
genus, Cyrtoceras.—Cambrian to Carboniferous.
Fam. 8. Lituitidae.—Shell coiled in a flat, sometimes loose spiral,
last whorl straight, containing the body-chamber, often greatly
prolonged. Principal genera: Lituites, Ophidioceras.—Ordovician and
Silurian.
Fam. 9. Trochoceratidae.—Shell helicoid, with seldom more than
two whorls, dextral or sinistral, last whorl sometimes partly uncoiled.
Principal genera: Trochoceras, Adelphoceras.—Ordovician to
Devonian.
Fam. 10. Nautilidae.—Shell with few whorls, more or less
overlapping, septa simple, siphuncle central or sub-central, aperture
not contracted.
The ‘tentacles’ are about 90 in number, and consist of four groups
each of 12 or 13 labial tentacles surrounding the mouth, two groups
each of 17 larger (brachial) tentacles on each side of the head, two
thicker tentacles which combine to form the ‘hood,’ and two small
tentacles on each side of the eye. When the animal swims, the
tentacles are extended radially from the head, somewhat like those
of a sea-anemone. The direction of the many pairs of tentacles at
constant but different angles from the head, is the most striking
feature in the living Nautilus, and accounts for its being described,
when seen on the surface, as ‘a shell with something like a
cauliflower sticking out of it.’[402] The funnel is not a complete tube,
but is formed by the overlapping of the margins of two thin fleshy
lobes (which are probably morphologically epipodia), so that when
the two lobes are parted, a broad canal appears, leading to the
branchial cavity. The head is conical, and the mouth and its
appendages can be retracted into a sort of sheath, over which fits
the ‘hood.’
Fig. 255.—A, Gomphoceras
ellipticum M’Coy, Silurian: B,
aperture (ap) of same; s, s,
septa; si, position of
siphuncle. (After Blake.)
Other genera are Trocholites, Gyroceras, Hercoceras, Discites,
Aturia.—Ordovician to present time.
Fam. 11. Bactritidae.—Shell straight, conical, siphuncle small,
marginal, septal necks long, funnel-shaped, sutures undulating, with
a sinus corresponding to the siphuncle. This family, from the form of
its sutures, appears to constitute a passage to the Ammonoidea.
Single genus, Bactrites.—Silurian and Devonian.
(b) Prosiphonata.—Septal necks directed forwards.
The two genera are Bathmoceras (Ordovician), shell straight,
conical always truncated, siphon marginal; and Nothoceras
(Silurian), shell nautiloid with simple sutures.
Sub-order 2. Ammonoidea.—Shell multiform, straight, curved, flat
spiral, or turreted, sutural line more or less complex, siphuncle
simple.
Some authorities hold that the members of this great sub-order,
now totally extinct, belong to the Dibranchiata, on the ground that the
protoconch resembles that of Spirula rather than that of the
Nautiloidea. Others again regard the Ammonoidea as a third, and
distinct Order of Cephalopoda. Their distribution extends from the
Silurian to (possibly) the early Tertiary. No trace has ever been found
of an ink-sac, mandible, or hooks on the arms; the shell was
undoubtedly external.
Order I. Amphineura
Bilaterally symmetrical Mollusca, anus at the terminal end of the
body, dorsal tegument more or less furnished with spicules.
Sub-order 1. Polyplacophora (Chitons).—Foot co-extensive with
ventral surface of the body, dorsum with eight transverse plates,
articulated (except in Chitonellus), a row of ctenidia on each side
between the mantle and the foot. Silurian ——.
The Chitons are found in all parts of the world, ranging in size
from a length of about half an inch to six inches or more in the giant
Cryptochiton. Although in the main sub-littoral, they occur at very
great depths; the Challenger dredged Leptochiton benthus Hadd. at
2300 fathoms. Chiton Polii exceptionally occurs at Malta—teste
MacAndrew—above sea margin, but within reach of the ripple. As a
rule, the Chitons live in concealment, on the under surface of stones
or in deep and narrow fissures in the rocks. When the stone to which
they are attached is turned over, they crawl slowly to the side which
is not exposed, as if disliking the light. An undescribed species,
however, which I took at Panama, crawled quite as fast as an
ordinary snail. Chiton fulvus Wood, apparently is accustomed to
crawl with some rapidity. MacAndrew took it in abundance on his
anchor chain in Vigo Bay every time his yacht was got under weigh.
He also found it crawling in sand on the shore, to which habit is no
doubt due its extreme cleanness and freedom from the foreign
growths which are so characteristic of many of the species. When
detached a Chiton contracts the muscles of the whole body, and rolls
up into a ball like a wood-louse.