Peer Review 1

1. Does their draft seem to be following the instructions? In other words,

did they create annotations for two popular sources and two academic
ones? The draft includes at least two annotations for both popular
sources as well as academic sources.
2. Does their research question narrow down their subject of research?
For example, have they identified the text, medium and genre they want
to look at? The research question proposed successfully narrowed
down the subject of research to "how Duolingo utilizes social media to
increase the app’s popularity." This is a good example of a narrowed
down topic because it includes the subject (Duolingo), what they want
to focus on (how the app has become increasingly more popular), and
where the point of focus is (social media).
3. Can you clearly understand how all the annotations connect with one
another? The annotations connect to one another by all analyzing how
space, color, and the design and overall presence is established on
social media.
4. Are the annotations in alphabetical order, and do they follow either APA
or MLA formatting? The annotations are both in alphabetical order and
following MLA formatting
5. Did the citations on their annotations look correct? The citations appear
to be complete.
6. Did they add a title page, page numbers, and other formatting
requirements? There is a title, page numbers, and last name in the
header.
7. What does the author have to say about their piece? Is there anything
they feel especially worried about that they want help with? Nothing in
particular stood out, just overall general improvements following up to
the due date of the final copy.
8. Are there any other aspects of their draft they can improve on?
Elaborate if so. Overall the draft seems to be complete. For the final
copy include at least one more credible secondary source to fulfil the
requirement.