Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Shen - Armstrong - 2008 - Impact of Group Sandtray Therapy On The Self-Esteem of Young Adolescent Girls
Shen - Armstrong - 2008 - Impact of Group Sandtray Therapy On The Self-Esteem of Young Adolescent Girls
To cite this article: Yu-Pei Shen & Stephen A. Armstrong (2008) Impact of Group Sandtray
Therapy on the Self-Esteem of Young Adolescent Girls, THE JOURNAL FOR SPECIALISTS IN
GROUP WORK, 33:2, 118-137, DOI: 10.1080/01933920801977397
THE JOURNAL FOR SPECIALISTS IN GROUP WORK, Vol. 33 No. 2, June 2008, 118–137
DOI: 10.1080/01933920801977397
# 2008 ASGW
118
Shen, Armstrong / GROUP SANDTRAY THERAPY 119
prior to the onset of some of the serious problems that many adolescent
girls develop such as sexually transmitted diseases and illegal drug
use. In addition, the need for prevention programs that strengthen
self-esteem (Polce-Lynch, Myers, & Kilmartin, 1998), improve signifi-
cant relationships (Moran & DuBois, 2002) and assist the transitional
development of adolescent girls has been identified (Rice & Meyer,
1994). A warm, non-confrontational, flexible, creative and activity-
based approach can promote the establishment of a therapeutic
relationship with adolescents and positively impact their behaviors
(Leadbeater, Kuperminc, & Blatt, 1999; Pollock & Kymissis, 2001;
Russell & Phillips-Miller, 2002). Some researchers have recommended
school-based programs designed to address self-esteem issues in
adolescent girls (Block & Robins, 1993; Merwin & Ellis, 2004).
Even though many authors and researchers have recommended pro-
grams for the enhancement of self-esteem in early adolescent girls, iden-
tifying girls with low self-esteem may be challenging because many girls
this age conceal their problems and have difficulty trusting someone to
help them (LeCroy, 2004a, 2004b). Therefore, many girls who need help
may not seek it. Counselors who work in middle schools and are familiar
with the issues and needs of the young adolescent girls whom they serve
are in an advantageous position to identify girls with low self-esteem. If a
trusting relationship with these girls can be developed, they may be will-
ing to participate in programs that enhance self-esteem.
Self-esteem refers to ‘‘the extent to which one prizes, values,
approves, or likes oneself’’ (Blascovich & Tomaka, 1991, p. 115). High
self-esteem is considered to be a protective factor for mental health
problems (Birndorf et al., 2005; DuBois, Burk-Braxton, & Swenson,
2002) and for decreasing overall adjustment difficulties (DuBois
et al.). Research findings show that self-esteem typically declines in
girls from early to late adolescence (Block & Robins, 1993; Harter,
1999; LeCroy, 2004a, 2004b; Rosenberg, 1985). In addition to the typi-
cal declines of self-esteem in girls this age, early adolescent girls
from diverse populations may be more at risk for declining self-esteem.
Holcomb-McCoy and Moore-Thomas (2001) noted that societal images
and stereotypes have negatively affected the self-esteem of young
adolescent African American girls. Therefore, it appears that imple-
menting preventive and treatment programs for enhancing self-
esteem during the middle school years would be strategic.
Sue and Sue (2004) noted that culturally competent counselors are
in the process of becoming aware of their values, biases and precon-
ceived notions and how they may affect minority clients. Culturally
competent counselors attempt to understand the worldview of cultu-
rally different clients and practice culturally sensitive intervention
strategies (Sue & Sue). All of the group therapists in the current
study had multicultural coursework and previous clinical experience
with culturally diverse clients. Through their studies and clinical
experience, the therapists developed at least a basic level of cultural
competence, including an understanding of how cultural group
membership influences the formations of worldviews (Sue, 2001).
In supervision, the therapists were challenged to become aware of
how their biases might affect their relationships with culturally
diverse clients. The therapists also were challenged in supervision
to be congruent in their interactions with all clients. Congruence
and authenticity is valued highly by African American clients
(Sue & Sue).
The researchers limited the group to one grade because Zinck and
Littrell (2000) indicated that adolescent girls feel more comfortable
expressing themselves with girls of their age. Lomonaco et al. (2000)
noted that groups comprised of participants and therapists of the same
gender are developmentally beneficial particularly in interpersonal
learning. Draper et al. (2003) also recommended same-sex groups
with girls in this age group because the flirting that occurs ‘‘when
adolescent boys and girls are together can be a distraction to the group
work and may inhibit the openness and honest disclosure’’ that group
leaders strive to achieve (p. 251).
The purpose of the current study was to examine the effectiveness
of group sandtray therapy with seventh grade girls with low self-
esteem. Flahive and Ray (2007) recently conducted a group sandtray
therapy study with preadolescents with behavioral problems. The cur-
rent study extended and modified Flahive and Ray’s approach and
examined the effectiveness of this modality with young adolescent
girls. Thus, this research resembled Flahive and Ray’s study with a
different population, presenting issue, and instrumentation. Flahive
and Ray’s study focused on group sandtray therapy with preadoles-
cents experiencing behavioral problems. They suggested that their
research could be replicated, and that similar research could be
conducted on different populations either with group or individual
sandtray therapy. Flahive and Ray also recommended limiting group
size with children who participate in group sandtray therapy.
In the current study, the effectiveness of group sandtray therapy in
enhancing self-esteem in seventh grade adolescent girls was evaluated
by comparing scores of the treatment and control groups obtained on
Shen, Armstrong / GROUP SANDTRAY THERAPY 123
METHOD
Research Design
Participants
Participants were 40 seventh-grade adolescent female students
from three middle schools in three different cities in the southwest-
ern United States. Though 40 participants completed the pretest,
three participants were not included in the posttest results due to
attrition and unavailability for the posttest. Two of the original part-
icipants were not allowed to continue in the project because of ser-
ious discipline referrals to the principal. A third original
participant was screened out of the project because of a court case
involving sexual abuse. The researchers assigned the participants
to either the treatment or control group according to the equality
of the group means of the total scores on the pretest (M ¼ 97.75,
SD ¼ 17.51 for the control group; M ¼ 98.65, SD ¼ 17.13 for the
124 THE JOURNAL FOR SPECIALISTS IN GROUP WORK / June 2008
Therapists
Three female therapists conducted group sandtray therapy in this
study. All of the therapists had training in the areas of sandtray ther-
apy, group therapy and play therapy. The therapists received
additional training in group sandtray therapy from the second author.
Two of the therapists were doctoral candidates in counseling and one
of these two was a licensed professional counselor. The third therapist
was a post-masters licensed professional counselor.
All of the therapists in the current study used a humanistic
approach to group sandtray therapy. In addition, all of the therapists
had previous experience counseling culturally diverse clients.
Instrumentation
six items, half of which are reversed with respect to whether the first
part of the statement reflects high or low competency. To avoid socially
desirable responses, Harter devised a structured alternative format that
first asked children to decide which part of a two-part statement
describes them best and then asks them to decide if this is really true
or only sort of true (Schumann et al., 1999).
Procedures
As you can see there are many and various miniatures on the shelves.
I would like you to take a look at them. I would like you to build a scene
of (the selected topic as described earlier) in your own sandtray by
using the sand and miniatures there. You may build your sandtray scene
in any way you like and use as many miniatures as you would like. When
you are working on building your scene, I will sit here quietly. Let me
know when you are finished.
session with a statement such as, ‘‘What would you like to share about
your sandtray scene with us? There may be something there that you
do not want to share, and that is fine. You may share it in any way
you like.’’ Such statements encouraged participants to share at their
own pace. The leaders facilitated the processing of sandtray scenes by
asking questions such as the following. ‘‘What will you name your sand-
tray scene’’? ‘‘Can you tell me more about this (miniature’’? ‘‘What is this
(miniature) doing’’? Facilitators used reflective responses as individuals
talked about their scenes. The therapists also used group skills such as
linking to normalize responses and feelings and to promote universality
(Yalom & Leszcz, 2005). More facilitative and elaborative questions such
as the questions above may be referenced in Homeyer and Sweeney
(1998). The role of the therapist in sandtray therapy is to be a facilitator.
The therapist intervened or set limits if negative or harmful comments
were delivered in a session (Draper et al., 2003).
Data Analysis
Split-Plot Analysis of Variance (SPANOVA) was utilized in data
analyses to determine the effectiveness of group sandtray therapy
on self-esteem, and SPSS1 13 computer software was used to run
the analysis. SPANOVA is used to analyze data from mixed designs,
designs with at least one between-subjects factor and at least one
within-subjects factor (Shavelson, 1996).
With SPANOVA, all of the relevant factors in the analysis are ana-
lyzed together rather than separately, which comes closer to reflecting
the relationship of the factors being analyzed. SPANOVA also reduces
the risk of experiment-wise type I error and increases power by
partitioning error.
RESULTS
Pre- and post-test scores were obtained on all six of the subscales
in the SPPC: Scholastic Competence, Social Acceptance, Athletic
Competence, Physical Appearance, Behavioral Conduct and Global
Self-worth. The means and standard deviations (SD) for the scores
on the six subscales are presented in Table 1.
A SPANOVA was conducted on each subscale; the between-subjects
variable was treatment (waiting-list control group and sandtray
therapy group), and the within-subjects variable was time (pretest
and posttest). Model assumptions of split-plot analysis of variance
(SPANOVA), which include independence, normality, homogeneity
of variances, and homogeneity of covariances (Shavelson, 1996), were
128 THE JOURNAL FOR SPECIALISTS IN GROUP WORK / June 2008
Table 1 Means and Standard Deviations for All Six Subscales in the SPPC
Pretest Posttest
F(1, 35) ¼ 2.769, p ¼ .105. The main effect between the treatment and
control groups also was not statistically significant.
There was a statistically significant interaction in the scores
of the Physical Appearance subscale across treatment and time, F(1,
35) ¼ 7.53, p ¼ .01. A statistically significant simple effect of the
treatment group between pretest and posttest was identified, F(1,
17) ¼ 12.658, p ¼ .002, with a medium effect size, Cohen’s d ¼ .52,
but not in the control group across time, F(1, 18) ¼ .404, p ¼ .533, with
a negligible effect size, Cohen’s d ¼ .1.
A statistically significant interaction in the scores of the Behavioral
Conduct subscale across treatment and time was detected, F(1, 35) ¼
10.413, p ¼ .003. The results of the simple effect showed that there
was not a statistically significant difference in the treatment group
between pretest and posttest, F(1, 17) ¼ 2.693, p ¼ .119. There was
a statistically significant simple effect of the control group between
pretest and posttest, F(1, 18) ¼ 8.269, p ¼ .01, with a medium effect
size, Cohen’s d ¼ .64.
Finally, a statistically significant interaction was found in the
scores of the Global Self-worth across treatment and time, F(1, 35) ¼
8.039, p ¼ .008. The results of the simple effect showed that there
was a statistically significant difference in the treatment group
between pretest and posttest, F(1, 17) ¼ 14.807, p ¼ .001, with a large
effect size, Cohen’s d ¼ .83. No statistically significant difference was
found in the control group across time.
In summary, there were statistically significant interactions on five
of the six subscales of the SPPC. In addition, the effect sizes of the sim-
ple effects were notable, indicating practically significant differences
in the treatment group over time with no corresponding changes in
the control group.
DISCUSSION
LeCroy (2004a) noted that little attention has been given to finding
effective preventive approaches with adolescents. The current study
provides a short-term, group intervention that enhanced the self-
esteem of young adolescent girls. Given that self-esteem is a protective
factor for mental health problems (Birndorf et al., 2005; DuBois et al.,
2002) and that low self-esteem is associated with adolescent girls who
have histories of suicidal ideation (Hull-Blanks, Kerr, & Robinson
Kurpius, 2004), it is critical to implement group programs that
enhance self-esteem in early adolescence in order to prevent poten-
tially serious mental health issues.
Group sandtray therapy is an economical, developmentally appro-
priate modality for young adolescents (Draper et al., 2003). The
current study used this modality to address self-esteem in young ado-
lescent girls at a time when their self-esteem is vulnerable to intra-
psychic and interpersonal factors that tend to diminish it (LeCroy,
2004a, 2004b). Developmentally appropriate and culturally responsive
134 THE JOURNAL FOR SPECIALISTS IN GROUP WORK / June 2008
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
Armstrong, S. A., & Berg, R. C. (2005). Demonstrating group process using 12 Angry
Men. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 30, 135–144.
Armstrong, S. A., & Henson, R. K. (2004). Statistical and practical significance in the
IJPT: A research review from 1993–2003. International Journal of Play Therapy,
13(2), 9–30.
Armstrong, S. A., & Henson, R. K. (2005). Statistical practices of IJPT researchers: A
review from 1993–2003. International Journal of Play Therapy, 14(1), 7–26.
Shen, Armstrong / GROUP SANDTRAY THERAPY 135
Hedges-Goettl, L., & Tannenbaum, M. (2001). Navigating the social landscape: A ration-
ale and method for interpersonal group therapy with pre-adolescent boys. Journal of
Child & Adolescent Group Therapy, 11, 135–146.
Holcomb-McCoy, C. C., & Moore-Thomas, C. (2001). Empowering African-American
adolescent females. Professional School Counseling, 5, 19–26.
Homeyer, L., & Sweeney, D. (1998). Sandtray therapy: A practical manual. Royal Oak,
MI: Self-Esteem Shop.
Hull-Blanks, E. E., Kerr, B. A., & Robinson Kurpius, S. E. (2004). Risk factors of suicidal
ideations and attempts in talented, at-risk girls. Suicide and Life-Threatening
Behavior, 34, 267–276.
Israel, A. C., & Ivanova, M. Y. (2002). Global and dimensional self-esteem in preadoles-
cent and early adolescent children who are overweight: Age and gender differences.
International Journal of Eating Disorders, 31, 424–429.
Kalff, D. (1980). Sandplay: A psychotherapeutic approach to the psyche. Cloverdale, CA:
Temenos Press.
Keery, H., Boutelle, K., & van den Berg, P. (2005). The impact of appearance-related
teasing by family members. Journal of Adolescent Health, 37, 120–127.
Kestly, T. (2001). Group sandplay in elementary schools. In A. Drewes, L. Carey &
C. Schaefer (Eds.), School-based play therapy (pp. 329–349). New York: John Wiley
& Sons.
Landreth, G. L. (2002). Play therapy: The art of the relationship. New York: Brunner-
Routledge.
Leadbeater, B. J., Kuperminc, G. P., & Blatt, S. J. (1999). A multivariate model of gender
differences in adolescents’ internalizing and externalizing problems. Developmental
Psychology, 35, 1268–1282.
LeCroy, C. W. (2004a). Evaluation of an empowerment program for early adolescent
girls. Adolescence, 39, 427–441.
LeCroy, C. W. (2004b). Experimental evaluation of ‘‘Go Grrrls’’ preventive intervention
for early adolescent girls. Journal of Primary Prevention, 25, 457–473.
Lomonaco, S., Scheidlinger, S., & Aronson, S. (2000). Five decades of children’s
group treatment: An overview. Journal of Child & Adolescent Group Therapy, 10, 77–96.
Martin, M. C., & Gentry, J. W. (1997). Stuck in the model trap: The effects of beautiful
models in ads on female pre-adolescents and adolescents. Journal of Advertising,
26(2), 19–33.
Meece, J. L. (1997). Child and adolescent development for educators. New York:
McGraw-Hill.
Merwin, R. M., & Ellis, J. B. (2004). Children’s reasons for living, self-esteem, and
violence. Archives of Suicide Research, 8, 251–261.
Moran, B. L., & DuBois, D. L. (2002). Relation of social support and self-esteem to
problem behavior: Investigation of differing models. Journal of Early Adolescence,
22, 407–435.
Muller, L. E. (2000). A 12-session, European-American-led therapy group for African-
American females. Professional School Counseling, 3, 264–269.
Nichols-Goldstein, N. (2001). The essence of effective leadership with adolescent groups:
Regression in the service of the ego. Journal of Child & Adolescent Group Therapy,
11, 13–17.
Ohannessian, C. M., Lerner, R. M., & Lerner, J. V. (1999). Does self-competence predict
gender differences in adolescent depression and anxiety? Journal of Adolescence, 22,
397–411.
Polce-Lynch, M., Myers, B. J., & Kilmartin, C. T. (1998). Gender and age patterns in
emotional expression, body image, and self-esteem: A qualitative analysis. Sex Roles,
38, 1025–1048.
Shen, Armstrong / GROUP SANDTRAY THERAPY 137
Pollock, K. M., & Kymissis, P. (2001). The future of adolescent group therapy. Journal of
Child & Adolescent Group Therapy, 11, 3–11.
Rice, K. G., & Meyer, A. L. (1994). Preventing depression among young adolescents:
Preliminary process results of a psycho-educational intervention program. Journal
of Therapy & Development, 73, 145–152.
Rosenberg, M. (1985). Self-concept and psychological well-being in adolescence. In
R. L. Leahy (Ed.), The development of the self (pp. 205–246). New York: Academic
Press.
Russell, K. C., & Phillips-Miller, D. (2002). Perspectives on the wilderness therapy
process and its relation to outcome. Child & Youth Care Forum, 31, 415–437.
Schumann, B. C., Striegel-Moore, R. H., McMahon, R. P., Waclawiw, M. A., Morrison, J. A.,
& Schreiber, G. B. (1999). Psychometric properties of the Self-Perception Profile for
Children in a bi-racial cohort of adolescent girls: The NHLBI growth and health study.
Journal of Personality Assessment, 73, 260–275.
Shavelson, R. (1996). Statistical reasoning for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Needham
Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Slavson, S. R. (1943). An introduction to group therapy. New York: International
Universities Press.
Steen, S., Bauman, S., & Smith, J. (2007). Professional school counselors and the
practice of group work. Professional School Counseling, 11, 72–80.
Sue, D. W. (2001). Multidimensional facets of cultural competence. The Counseling
Psychologist, 29, 790–821.
Sue, D. W., & Sue, D. (2004). Counseling the culturally different: Theory and practice.
New York: Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Tuckman, B. W., & Jensen, M. A. C. (1977). Stages of small group development revisited.
Group and Organizational Studies, 2, 419–427.
Tyndall-Lind, A., & Landreth, G. L. (2000). Intensive short-term group play therapy.
In G. L. Landreth (Ed.), Innovations in play therapy: Issues, process, and special
populations (pp. 203–215). New York: Brunner-Routledge.
Yalom, I. D., & Leszcz, M. (2005). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy
(5th ed.). New York: Basic Books.
Young, J. L. (1994). Sapphires-in-Transition: Enhancing personal development among
Black female adolescents. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development,
22, 86–95.
Zinck, K., & Littrell, J. M. (2000). Action research shows group therapy effective with
at-risk adolescent girls. Professional School Counseling, 4, 50–59.