Poststructuralism: A Very Short

Introduction, 2nd Edition Catherine

Belsey
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebookmass.com/product/poststructuralism-a-very-short-introduction-2nd-editio
n-catherine-belsey/
Poststructuralism: A Very Short Introduction
 VERY SHORT INTRODUCTIONS are for anyone wanting a stimulating and
accessible way into a new subject. They are written by experts, and have
been translated into more than 45 different languages.
The series began in 1995, and now covers a wide variety of topics in every
discipline. The VSI library currently contains over 700 volumes—a Very Short
Introduction to everything from Psychology and Philosophy of Science to
American History and Relativity—and continues to grow in every subject
area.

Very Short Introductions available now:

ABOLITIONISM Richard S. Newman

THE ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS Charles L. Cohen
ACCOUNTING Christopher Nobes
ADOLESCENCE Peter K. Smith
THEODOR W. ADORNO Andrew Bowie
ADVERTISING Winston Fletcher
AERIAL WARFARE Frank Ledwidge
AESTHETICS Bence Nanay
AFRICAN AMERICAN RELIGION Eddie S. Glaude Jr
AFRICAN HISTORY John Parker and Richard Rathbone
AFRICAN POLITICS Ian Taylor
AFRICAN RELIGIONS Jacob K. Olupona
AGEING Nancy A. Pachana
AGNOSTICISM Robin Le Poidevin
AGRICULTURE Paul Brassley and Richard Soffe
ALEXANDER THE GREAT Hugh Bowden
ALGEBRA Peter M. Higgins
AMERICAN BUSINESS HISTORY Walter A. Friedman
AMERICAN CULTURAL HISTORY Eric Avila
AMERICAN FOREIGN RELATIONS Andrew Preston
AMERICAN HISTORY Paul S. Boyer
AMERICAN IMMIGRATION David A. Gerber
AMERICAN INTELLECTUAL HISTORY Jennifer Ratner-Rosenhagen
AMERICAN LEGAL HISTORY G. Edward White
AMERICAN MILITARY HISTORY Joseph T. Glatthaar
AMERICAN NAVAL HISTORY Craig L. Symonds
AMERICAN POETRY David Caplan
AMERICAN POLITICAL HISTORY Donald Critchlow
AMERICAN POLITICAL PARTIES AND ELECTIONS L. Sandy Maisel
AMERICAN POLITICS Richard M. Valelly
THE AMERICAN PRESIDENCY Charles O. Jones
THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION Robert J. Allison
AMERICAN SLAVERY Heather Andrea Williams
THE AMERICAN SOUTH Charles Reagan Wilson
THE AMERICAN WEST Stephen Aron
AMERICAN WOMEN’S HISTORY Susan Ware
AMPHIBIANS T. S. Kemp
ANAESTHESIA Aidan O’Donnell
ANALYTIC PHILOSOPHY Michael Beaney
ANARCHISM Colin Ward
ANCIENT ASSYRIA Karen Radner
ANCIENT EGYPT Ian Shaw
ANCIENT EGYPTIAN ART AND ARCHITECTURE Christina Riggs
ANCIENT GREECE Paul Cartledge
THE ANCIENT NEAR EAST Amanda H. Podany
ANCIENT PHILOSOPHY Julia Annas
ANCIENT WARFARE Harry Sidebottom
ANGELS David Albert Jones
ANGLICANISM Mark Chapman
THE ANGLO-SAXON AGE John Blair
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR Tristram D. Wyatt
THE ANIMAL KINGDOM Peter Holland
ANIMAL RIGHTS David DeGrazia
THE ANTARCTIC Klaus Dodds
ANTHROPOCENE Erle C. Ellis
ANTISEMITISM Steven Beller
ANXIETY Daniel Freeman and Jason Freeman
THE APOCRYPHAL GOSPELS Paul Foster
APPLIED MATHEMATICS Alain Goriely
THOMAS AQUINAS Fergus Kerr
ARBITRATION Thomas Schultz and Thomas Grant
ARCHAEOLOGY Paul Bahn
ARCHITECTURE Andrew Ballantyne
THE ARCTIC Klaus Dodds and Jamie Woodward
ARISTOCRACY William Doyle
ARISTOTLE Jonathan Barnes
ART HISTORY Dana Arnold
ART THEORY Cynthia Freeland
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Margaret A. Boden
ASIAN AMERICAN HISTORY Madeline Y. Hsu
ASTROBIOLOGY David C. Catling
ASTROPHYSICS James Binney
ATHEISM Julian Baggini
THE ATMOSPHERE Paul I. Palmer
AUGUSTINE Henry Chadwick
JANE AUSTEN Tom Keymer
AUSTRALIA Kenneth Morgan
AUTISM Uta Frith
AUTOBIOGRAPHY Laura Marcus
THE AVANT GARDE David Cottington
THE AZTECS Davíd Carrasco
BABYLONIA Trevor Bryce
BACTERIA Sebastian G. B. Amyes
BANKING John Goddard and John O. S. Wilson
BARTHES Jonathan Culler
THE BEATS David Sterritt
BEAUTY Roger Scruton
LUDWIG VAN BEETHOVEN Mark Evan Bonds
BEHAVIOURAL ECONOMICS Michelle Baddeley
BESTSELLERS John Sutherland
THE BIBLE John Riches
BIBLICAL ARCHAEOLOGY Eric H. Cline
BIG DATA Dawn E. Holmes
BIOCHEMISTRY Mark Lorch
BIOGEOGRAPHY Mark V. Lomolino
BIOGRAPHY Hermione Lee
BIOMETRICS Michael Fairhurst
ELIZABETH BISHOP Jonathan F. S. Post
BLACK HOLES Katherine Blundell
BLASPHEMY Yvonne Sherwood
BLOOD Chris Cooper
THE BLUES Elijah Wald
THE BODY Chris Shilling
NIELS BOHR J. L. Heilbron
THE BOOK OF COMMON PRAYER Brian Cummings
THE BOOK OF MORMON Terryl Givens
BORDERS Alexander C. Diener and Joshua Hagen
THE BRAIN Michael O’Shea
BRANDING Robert Jones
THE BRICS Andrew F. Cooper
THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION Martin Loughlin
THE BRITISH EMPIRE Ashley Jackson
BRITISH POLITICS Tony Wright
BUDDHA Michael Carrithers
BUDDHISM Damien Keown
BUDDHIST ETHICS Damien Keown
BYZANTIUM Peter Sarris
CALVINISM Jon Balserak
ALBERT CAMUS Oliver Gloag
CANADA Donald Wright
CANCER Nicholas James
CAPITALISM James Fulcher
CATHOLICISM Gerald O’Collins
CAUSATION Stephen Mumford and Rani Lill Anjum
THE CELL Terence Allen and Graham Cowling
THE CELTS Barry Cunliffe
CHAOS Leonard Smith
GEOFFREY CHAUCER David Wallace
CHEMISTRY Peter Atkins
CHILD PSYCHOLOGY Usha Goswami
CHILDREN’S LITERATURE Kimberley Reynolds
CHINESE LITERATURE Sabina Knight
CHOICE THEORY Michael Allingham
CHRISTIAN ART Beth Williamson
CHRISTIAN ETHICS D. Stephen Long
CHRISTIANITY Linda Woodhead
CIRCADIAN RHYTHMS Russell Foster and Leon Kreitzman
CITIZENSHIP Richard Bellamy
CITY PLANNING Carl Abbott
CIVIL ENGINEERING David Muir Wood
CLASSICAL LITERATURE William Allan
CLASSICAL MYTHOLOGY Helen Morales
CLASSICS Mary Beard and John Henderson
CLAUSEWITZ Michael Howard
CLIMATE Mark Maslin
CLIMATE CHANGE Mark Maslin
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY Susan Llewelyn and Katie Aafjes-van Doorn
COGNITIVE BEHAVIOURAL THERAPY Freda McManus
COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE Richard Passingham
THE COLD WAR Robert J. McMahon
COLONIAL AMERICA Alan Taylor
COLONIAL LATIN AMERICAN LITERATURE Rolena Adorno
COMBINATORICS Robin Wilson
COMEDY Matthew Bevis
COMMUNISM Leslie Holmes
COMPARATIVE LITERATURE Ben Hutchinson
COMPETITION AND ANTITRUST LAW Ariel Ezrachi
COMPLEXITY John H. Holland
THE COMPUTER Darrel Ince
COMPUTER SCIENCE Subrata Dasgupta
CONCENTRATION CAMPS Dan Stone
CONFUCIANISM Daniel K. Gardner
THE CONQUISTADORS Matthew Restall and Felipe Fernández-Armesto
CONSCIENCE Paul Strohm
CONSCIOUSNESS Susan Blackmore
CONTEMPORARY ART Julian Stallabrass
CONTEMPORARY FICTION Robert Eaglestone
CONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHY Simon Critchley
COPERNICUS Owen Gingerich
CORAL REEFS Charles Sheppard
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY Jeremy Moon
CORRUPTION Leslie Holmes
COSMOLOGY Peter Coles
COUNTRY MUSIC Richard Carlin
CREATIVITY Vlad Glăveanu
CRIME FICTION Richard Bradford
CRIMINAL JUSTICE Julian V. Roberts
CRIMINOLOGY Tim Newburn
CRITICAL THEORY Stephen Eric Bronner
THE CRUSADES Christopher Tyerman
CRYPTOGRAPHY Fred Piper and Sean Murphy
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY A. M. Glazer
THE CULTURAL REVOLUTION Richard Curt Kraus
DADA AND SURREALISM David Hopkins
DANTE Peter Hainsworth and David Robey
DARWIN Jonathan Howard
THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS Timothy H. Lim
DECADENCE David Weir
DECOLONIZATION Dane Kennedy
DEMENTIA Kathleen Taylor
DEMOCRACY Bernard Crick
DEMOGRAPHY Sarah Harper
DEPRESSION Jan Scott and Mary Jane Tacchi
DERRIDA Simon Glendinning
DESCARTES Tom Sorell
DESERTS Nick Middleton
DESIGN John Heskett
DEVELOPMENT Ian Goldin
DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY Lewis Wolpert
THE DEVIL Darren Oldridge
DIASPORA Kevin Kenny
CHARLES DICKENS Jenny Hartley
DICTIONARIES Lynda Mugglestone
DINOSAURS David Norman
DIPLOMATIC HISTORY Joseph M. Siracusa
DOCUMENTARY FILM Patricia Aufderheide
DREAMING J. Allan Hobson
DRUGS Les Iversen
DRUIDS Barry Cunliffe
DYNASTY Jeroen Duindam
DYSLEXIA Margaret J. Snowling
EARLY MUSIC Thomas Forrest Kelly
THE EARTH Martin Redfern
EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE Tim Lenton
ECOLOGY Jaboury Ghazoul
ECONOMICS Partha Dasgupta
EDUCATION Gary Thomas
EGYPTIAN MYTH Geraldine Pinch
EIGHTEENTH‑CENTURY BRITAIN Paul Langford
THE ELEMENTS Philip Ball
EMOTION Dylan Evans
EMPIRE Stephen Howe
EMPLOYMENT LAW David Cabrelli
ENERGY SYSTEMS Nick Jenkins
ENGELS Terrell Carver
ENGINEERING David Blockley
THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE Simon Horobin
ENGLISH LITERATURE Jonathan Bate
THE ENLIGHTENMENT John Robertson
ENTREPRENEURSHIP Paul Westhead and Mike Wright
ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS Stephen Smith
ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS Robin Attfield
ENVIRONMENTAL LAW Elizabeth Fisher
ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS Andrew Dobson
ENZYMES Paul Engel
EPICUREANISM Catherine Wilson
EPIDEMIOLOGY Rodolfo Saracci
ETHICS Simon Blackburn
ETHNOMUSICOLOGY Timothy Rice
THE ETRUSCANS Christopher Smith
EUGENICS Philippa Levine
THE EUROPEAN UNION Simon Usherwood and John Pinder
EUROPEAN UNION LAW Anthony Arnull
EVANGELICALISM John Stackhouse
EVOLUTION Brian and Deborah Charlesworth
EXISTENTIALISM Thomas Flynn
EXPLORATION Stewart A. Weaver
EXTINCTION Paul B. Wignall
THE EYE Michael Land
FAIRY TALE Marina Warner
FAMILY LAW Jonathan Herring
MICHAEL FARADAY Frank A. J. L. James
FASCISM Kevin Passmore
FASHION Rebecca Arnold
FEDERALISM Mark J. Rozell and Clyde Wilcox
FEMINISM Margaret Walters
FILM Michael Wood
FILM MUSIC Kathryn Kalinak
FILM NOIR James Naremore
FIRE Andrew C. Scott
THE FIRST WORLD WAR Michael Howard
FLUID MECHANICS Eric Lauga
FOLK MUSIC Mark Slobin
FOOD John Krebs
FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY David Canter
FORENSIC SCIENCE Jim Fraser
FORESTS Jaboury Ghazoul
FOSSILS Keith Thomson
FOUCAULT Gary Gutting
THE FOUNDING FATHERS R. B. Bernstein
FRACTALS Kenneth Falconer
FREE SPEECH Nigel Warburton
FREE WILL Thomas Pink
FREEMASONRY Andreas Önnerfors
FRENCH LITERATURE John D. Lyons
FRENCH PHILOSOPHY Stephen Gaukroger and Knox Peden
THE FRENCH REVOLUTION William Doyle
FREUD Anthony Storr
FUNDAMENTALISM Malise Ruthven
FUNGI Nicholas P. Money
THE FUTURE Jennifer M. Gidley
GALAXIES John Gribbin
GALILEO Stillman Drake
GAME THEORY Ken Binmore
GANDHI Bhikhu Parekh
GARDEN HISTORY Gordon Campbell
GENES Jonathan Slack
GENIUS Andrew Robinson
GENOMICS John Archibald
GEOGRAPHY John Matthews and David Herbert
GEOLOGY Jan Zalasiewicz
GEOMETRY Maciej Dunajski
GEOPHYSICS William Lowrie
GEOPOLITICS Klaus Dodds
GERMAN LITERATURE Nicholas Boyle
GERMAN PHILOSOPHY Andrew Bowie
THE GHETTO Bryan Cheyette
GLACIATION David J. A. Evans
GLOBAL CATASTROPHES Bill McGuire
GLOBAL ECONOMIC HISTORY Robert C. Allen
GLOBAL ISLAM Nile Green
GLOBALIZATION Manfred B. Steger
GOD John Bowker
GOETHE Ritchie Robertson
THE GOTHIC Nick Groom
GOVERNANCE Mark Bevir
GRAVITY Timothy Clifton
THE GREAT DEPRESSION AND THE NEW DEAL Eric Rauchway
HABEAS CORPUS Amanda Tyler
HABERMAS James Gordon Finlayson
THE HABSBURG EMPIRE Martyn Rady
HAPPINESS Daniel M. Haybron
THE HARLEM RENAISSANCE Cheryl A. Wall
THE HEBREW BIBLE AS LITERATURE Tod Linafelt
HEGEL Peter Singer
HEIDEGGER Michael Inwood
THE HELLENISTIC AGE Peter Thonemann
HEREDITY John Waller
HERMENEUTICS Jens Zimmermann
HERODOTUS Jennifer T. Roberts
HIEROGLYPHS Penelope Wilson
HINDUISM Kim Knott
HISTORY John H. Arnold
THE HISTORY OF ASTRONOMY Michael Hoskin
THE HISTORY OF CHEMISTRY William H. Brock
THE HISTORY OF CHILDHOOD James Marten
THE HISTORY OF CINEMA Geoffrey Nowell-Smith
THE HISTORY OF LIFE Michael Benton
THE HISTORY OF MATHEMATICS Jacqueline Stedall
THE HISTORY OF MEDICINE William Bynum
THE HISTORY OF PHYSICS J. L. Heilbron
THE HISTORY OF POLITICAL THOUGHT Richard Whatmore
THE HISTORY OF TIME Leofranc Holford‑Strevens
HIV AND AIDS Alan Whiteside
HOBBES Richard Tuck
HOLLYWOOD Peter Decherney
THE HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE Joachim Whaley
HOME Michael Allen Fox
HOMER Barbara Graziosi
HORMONES Martin Luck
HORROR Darryl Jones
HUMAN ANATOMY Leslie Klenerman
HUMAN EVOLUTION Bernard Wood
HUMAN PHYSIOLOGY Jamie A. Davies
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Adrian Wilkinson
HUMAN RIGHTS Andrew Clapham
HUMANISM Stephen Law
HUME James A. Harris
HUMOUR Noël Carroll
THE ICE AGE Jamie Woodward
IDENTITY Florian Coulmas
IDEOLOGY Michael Freeden
THE IMMUNE SYSTEM Paul Klenerman
INDIAN CINEMA Ashish Rajadhyaksha
INDIAN PHILOSOPHY Sue Hamilton
THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION Robert C. Allen
INFECTIOUS DISEASE Marta L. Wayne and Benjamin M. Bolker
INFINITY Ian Stewart
INFORMATION Luciano Floridi
INNOVATION Mark Dodgson and David Gann
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Siva Vaidhyanathan
INTELLIGENCE Ian J. Deary
INTERNATIONAL LAW Vaughan Lowe
INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION Khalid Koser
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Christian Reus-Smit
INTERNATIONAL SECURITY Christopher S. Browning
INSECTS Simon Leather
IRAN Ali M. Ansari
ISLAM Malise Ruthven
ISLAMIC HISTORY Adam Silverstein
ISLAMIC LAW Mashood A. Baderin
ISOTOPES Rob Ellam
ITALIAN LITERATURE Peter Hainsworth and David Robey
HENRY JAMES Susan L. Mizruchi
JESUS Richard Bauckham
JEWISH HISTORY David N. Myers
JEWISH LITERATURE Ilan Stavans
JOURNALISM Ian Hargreaves
JAMES JOYCE Colin MacCabe
JUDAISM Norman Solomon
JUNG Anthony Stevens
KABBALAH Joseph Dan
KAFKA Ritchie Robertson
KANT Roger Scruton
KEYNES Robert Skidelsky
KIERKEGAARD Patrick Gardiner
KNOWLEDGE Jennifer Nagel
THE KORAN Michael Cook
KOREA Michael J. Seth
LAKES Warwick F. Vincent
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Ian H. Thompson
LANDSCAPES AND GEOMORPHOLOGY Andrew Goudie and Heather Viles
LANGUAGES Stephen R. Anderson
LATE ANTIQUITY Gillian Clark
LAW Raymond Wacks
THE LAWS OF THERMODYNAMICS Peter Atkins
LEADERSHIP Keith Grint
LEARNING Mark Haselgrove
LEIBNIZ Maria Rosa Antognazza
C. S. LEWIS James Como
LIBERALISM Michael Freeden
LIGHT Ian Walmsley
LINCOLN Allen C. Guelzo
LINGUISTICS Peter Matthews
LITERARY THEORY Jonathan Culler
LOCKE John Dunn
LOGIC Graham Priest
LOVE Ronald de Sousa
MARTIN LUTHER Scott H. Hendrix
MACHIAVELLI Quentin Skinner
MADNESS Andrew Scull
MAGIC Owen Davies
MAGNA CARTA Nicholas Vincent
MAGNETISM Stephen Blundell
MALTHUS Donald Winch
MAMMALS T. S. Kemp
MANAGEMENT John Hendry
NELSON MANDELA Elleke Boehmer
MAO Delia Davin
MARINE BIOLOGY Philip V. Mladenov
MARKETING Kenneth Le Meunier-FitzHugh
THE MARQUIS DE SADE John Phillips
MARTYRDOM Jolyon Mitchell
MARX Peter Singer
MATERIALS Christopher Hall
MATHEMATICAL FINANCE Mark H. A. Davis
MATHEMATICS Timothy Gowers
MATTER Geoff Cottrell
THE MAYA Matthew Restall and Amara Solari
THE MEANING OF LIFE Terry Eagleton
MEASUREMENT David Hand
MEDICAL ETHICS Michael Dunn and Tony Hope
MEDICAL LAW Charles Foster
MEDIEVAL BRITAIN John Gillingham and Ralph A. Griffiths
MEDIEVAL LITERATURE Elaine Treharne
MEDIEVAL PHILOSOPHY John Marenbon
MEMORY Jonathan K. Foster
METAPHYSICS Stephen Mumford
METHODISM William J. Abraham
THE MEXICAN REVOLUTION Alan Knight
MICROBIOLOGY Nicholas P. Money
MICROECONOMICS Avinash Dixit
MICROSCOPY Terence Allen
THE MIDDLE AGES Miri Rubin
MILITARY JUSTICE Eugene R. Fidell
MILITARY STRATEGY Antulio J. Echevarria II
JOHN STUART MILL Gregory Claeys
MINERALS David Vaughan
MIRACLES Yujin Nagasawa
MODERN ARCHITECTURE Adam Sharr
MODERN ART David Cottington
MODERN BRAZIL Anthony W. Pereira
MODERN CHINA Rana Mitter
MODERN DRAMA Kirsten E. Shepherd-Barr
MODERN FRANCE Vanessa R. Schwartz
MODERN INDIA Craig Jeffrey
MODERN IRELAND Senia Pašeta
MODERN ITALY Anna Cento Bull
MODERN JAPAN Christopher Goto-Jones
MODERN LATIN AMERICAN LITERATURE Roberto González Echevarría
MODERN WAR Richard English
MODERNISM Christopher Butler
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Aysha Divan and Janice A. Royds
MOLECULES Philip Ball
MONASTICISM Stephen J. Davis
THE MONGOLS Morris Rossabi
MONTAIGNE William M. Hamlin
MOONS David A. Rothery
MORMONISM Richard Lyman Bushman
MOUNTAINS Martin F. Price
MUHAMMAD Jonathan A. C. Brown
MULTICULTURALISM Ali Rattansi
MULTILINGUALISM John C. Maher
MUSIC Nicholas Cook
MYTH Robert A. Segal
NAPOLEON David Bell
THE NAPOLEONIC WARS Mike Rapport
NATIONALISM Steven Grosby
NATIVE AMERICAN LITERATURE Sean Teuton
NAVIGATION Jim Bennett
NAZI GERMANY Jane Caplan
NEOLIBERALISM Manfred B. Steger and Ravi K. Roy
NETWORKS Guido Caldarelli and Michele Catanzaro
THE NEW TESTAMENT Luke Timothy Johnson
THE NEW TESTAMENT AS LITERATURE Kyle Keefer
NEWTON Robert Iliffe
NIETZSCHE Michael Tanner
NINETEENTH‑CENTURY BRITAIN Christopher Harvie and H. C. G. Matthew
THE NORMAN CONQUEST George Garnett
NORTH AMERICAN INDIANS Theda Perdue and Michael D. Green
NORTHERN IRELAND Marc Mulholland
NOTHING Frank Close
NUCLEAR PHYSICS Frank Close
NUCLEAR POWER Maxwell Irvine
NUCLEAR WEAPONS Joseph M. Siracusa
NUMBER THEORY Robin Wilson
NUMBERS Peter M. Higgins
NUTRITION David A. Bender
OBJECTIVITY Stephen Gaukroger
OCEANS Dorrik Stow
THE OLD TESTAMENT Michael D. Coogan
THE ORCHESTRA D. Kern Holoman
ORGANIC CHEMISTRY Graham Patrick
ORGANIZATIONS Mary Jo Hatch
ORGANIZED CRIME Georgios A. Antonopoulos and Georgios Papanicolaou
ORTHODOX CHRISTIANITY A. Edward Siecienski
OVID Llewelyn Morgan
PAGANISM Owen Davies
PAKISTAN Pippa Virdee
THE PALESTINIAN-ISRAELI CONFLICT Martin Bunton
PANDEMICS Christian W. McMillen
PARTICLE PHYSICS Frank Close
PAUL E. P. Sanders
PEACE Oliver P. Richmond
PENTECOSTALISM William K. Kay
PERCEPTION Brian Rogers
THE PERIODIC TABLE Eric R. Scerri
PHILOSOPHICAL METHOD Timothy Williamson
PHILOSOPHY Edward Craig
PHILOSOPHY IN THE ISLAMIC WORLD Peter Adamson
PHILOSOPHY OF BIOLOGY Samir Okasha
PHILOSOPHY OF LAW Raymond Wacks
PHILOSOPHY OF MIND Barbara Gail Montero
PHILOSOPHY OF PHYSICS David Wallace
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Samir Okasha
PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION Tim Bayne
PHOTOGRAPHY Steve Edwards
PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY Peter Atkins
PHYSICS Sidney Perkowitz
PILGRIMAGE Ian Reader
PLAGUE Paul Slack
PLANETARY SYSTEMS Raymond T. Pierrehumbert
PLANETS David A. Rothery
PLANTS Timothy Walker
PLATE TECTONICS Peter Molnar
PLATO Julia Annas
POETRY Bernard O’Donoghue
POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY David Miller
POLITICS Kenneth Minogue
POLYGAMY Sarah M. S. Pearsall
POPULISM Cas Mudde and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser
POSTCOLONIALISM Robert Young
POSTMODERNISM Christopher Butler
POSTSTRUCTURALISM Catherine Belsey
POVERTY Philip N. Jefferson
PREHISTORY Chris Gosden
PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY Catherine Osborne
PRIVACY Raymond Wacks
PROBABILITY John Haigh
PROGRESSIVISM Walter Nugent
PROHIBITION W. J. Rorabaugh
PROJECTS Andrew Davies
PROTESTANTISM Mark A. Noll
PSYCHIATRY Tom Burns
PSYCHOANALYSIS Daniel Pick
PSYCHOLOGY Gillian Butler and Freda McManus
PSYCHOLOGY OF MUSIC Elizabeth Hellmuth Margulis
PSYCHOPATHY Essi Viding
PSYCHOTHERAPY Tom Burns and Eva Burns-Lundgren
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Stella Z. Theodoulou and Ravi K. Roy
PUBLIC HEALTH Virginia Berridge
PURITANISM Francis J. Bremer
THE QUAKERS Pink Dandelion
QUANTUM THEORY John Polkinghorne
RACISM Ali Rattansi
RADIOACTIVITY Claudio Tuniz
RASTAFARI Ennis B. Edmonds
READING Belinda Jack
THE REAGAN REVOLUTION Gil Troy
REALITY Jan Westerhoff
RECONSTRUCTION Allen C. Guelzo
THE REFORMATION Peter Marshall
REFUGEES Gil Loescher
RELATIVITY Russell Stannard
RELIGION Thomas A. Tweed
RELIGION IN AMERICA Timothy Beal
THE RENAISSANCE Jerry Brotton
RENAISSANCE ART Geraldine A. Johnson
RENEWABLE ENERGY Nick Jelley
REPTILES T.S. Kemp
REVOLUTIONS Jack A. Goldstone
RHETORIC Richard Toye
RISK Baruch Fischhoff and John Kadvany
RITUAL Barry Stephenson
RIVERS Nick Middleton
ROBOTICS Alan Winfield
ROCKS Jan Zalasiewicz
ROMAN BRITAIN Peter Salway
THE ROMAN EMPIRE Christopher Kelly
THE ROMAN REPUBLIC David M. Gwynn
ROMANTICISM Michael Ferber
ROUSSEAU Robert Wokler
RUSSELL A. C. Grayling
THE RUSSIAN ECONOMY Richard Connolly
RUSSIAN HISTORY Geoffrey Hosking
RUSSIAN LITERATURE Catriona Kelly
THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION S. A. Smith
SAINTS Simon Yarrow
SAMURAI Michael Wert
SAVANNAS Peter A. Furley
SCEPTICISM Duncan Pritchard
SCHIZOPHRENIA Chris Frith and Eve Johnstone
SCHOPENHAUER Christopher Janaway
SCIENCE AND RELIGION Thomas Dixon and Adam R. Shapiro
SCIENCE FICTION David Seed
THE SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION Lawrence M. Principe
SCOTLAND Rab Houston
SECULARISM Andrew Copson
SEXUAL SELECTION Marlene Zuk and Leigh W. Simmons
SEXUALITY Véronique Mottier
WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE Stanley Wells
SHAKESPEARE’S COMEDIES Bart van Es
SHAKESPEARE’S SONNETS AND POEMS Jonathan F. S. Post
SHAKESPEARE’S TRAGEDIES Stanley Wells
GEORGE BERNARD SHAW Christopher Wixson
MARY SHELLEY Charlotte Gordon
THE SHORT STORY Andrew Kahn
SIKHISM Eleanor Nesbitt
SILENT FILM Donna Kornhaber
THE SILK ROAD James A. Millward
SLANG Jonathon Green
SLEEP Steven W. Lockley and Russell G. Foster
SMELL Matthew Cobb
ADAM SMITH Christopher J. Berry
SOCIAL AND CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY John Monaghan and Peter Just
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY Richard J. Crisp
SOCIAL WORK Sally Holland and Jonathan Scourfield
SOCIALISM Michael Newman
SOCIOLINGUISTICS John Edwards
SOCIOLOGY Steve Bruce
SOCRATES C. C. W. Taylor
SOFT MATTER Tom McLeish
SOUND Mike Goldsmith
SOUTHEAST ASIA James R. Rush
THE SOVIET UNION Stephen Lovell
THE SPANISH CIVIL WAR Helen Graham
SPANISH LITERATURE Jo Labanyi
THE SPARTANS Andrew Bayliss
SPINOZA Roger Scruton
SPIRITUALITY Philip Sheldrake
SPORT Mike Cronin
STARS Andrew King
STATISTICS David J. Hand
STEM CELLS Jonathan Slack
STOICISM Brad Inwood
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING David Blockley
STUART BRITAIN John Morrill
THE SUN Philip Judge
SUPERCONDUCTIVITY Stephen Blundell
SUPERSTITION Stuart Vyse
SYMMETRY Ian Stewart
SYNAESTHESIA Julia Simner
SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY Jamie A. Davies
SYSTEMS BIOLOGY Eberhard O. Voit
TAXATION Stephen Smith
TEETH Peter S. Ungar
TELESCOPES Geoff Cottrell
TERRORISM Charles Townshend
THEATRE Marvin Carlson
THEOLOGY David F. Ford
THINKING AND REASONING Jonathan St B. T. Evans
THOUGHT Tim Bayne
TIBETAN BUDDHISM Matthew T. Kapstein
TIDES David George Bowers and Emyr Martyn Roberts
TIME Jenann Ismael
TOCQUEVILLE Harvey C. Mansfield
LEO TOLSTOY Liza Knapp
TOPOLOGY Richard Earl
TRAGEDY Adrian Poole
TRANSLATION Matthew Reynolds
THE TREATY OF VERSAILLES Michael S. Neiberg
TRIGONOMETRY Glen Van Brummelen
THE TROJAN WAR Eric H. Cline
TRUST Katherine Hawley
THE TUDORS John Guy
TWENTIETH‑CENTURY BRITAIN Kenneth O. Morgan
TYPOGRAPHY Paul Luna
THE UNITED NATIONS Jussi M. Hanhimäki
UNIVERSITIES AND COLLEGES David Palfreyman and Paul Temple
THE U.S. CIVIL WAR Louis P. Masur
THE U.S. CONGRESS Donald A. Ritchie
THE U.S. CONSTITUTION David J. Bodenhamer
THE U.S. SUPREME COURT Linda Greenhouse
UTILITARIANISM Katarzyna de Lazari-Radek and Peter Singer
UTOPIANISM Lyman Tower Sargent
VETERINARY SCIENCE James Yeates
THE VIKINGS Julian D. Richards
VIOLENCE Philip Dwyer
THE VIRGIN MARY Mary Joan Winn Leith
THE VIRTUES Craig A. Boyd and Kevin Timpe
VIRUSES Dorothy H. Crawford
VOLCANOES Michael J. Branney and Jan Zalasiewicz
VOLTAIRE Nicholas Cronk
WAR AND RELIGION Jolyon Mitchell and Joshua Rey
WAR AND TECHNOLOGY Alex Roland
WATER John Finney
WAVES Mike Goldsmith
WEATHER Storm Dunlop
THE WELFARE STATE David Garland
WITCHCRAFT Malcolm Gaskill
WITTGENSTEIN A. C. Grayling
WORK Stephen Fineman
WORLD MUSIC Philip Bohlman
THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION Amrita Narlikar
WORLD WAR II Gerhard L. Weinberg
WRITING AND SCRIPT Andrew Robinson
ZIONISM Michael Stanislawski
ÉMILE ZOLA Brian Nelson

Available soon:
HANNAH ARENDT Dana Villa
BRITISH CINEMA Charles Barr
THE NOVEL Robert Eaglestone
NEGOTIATION Carrie Menkel-Meadow
GÖDEL’S THEOREM Adrian Moore

For more information visit our website

www.oup.com/vsi/
 Catherine Belsey

POSTSTRUCTURALISM
A Very Short Introduction
SECOND EDITION
 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP, United Kingdom
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the
University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing
worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in
certain other countries
© Catherine Belsey 2022
The moral rights of the author have been asserted
First edition published 2002
This edition published 2022
Impression: 1
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval
system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in
writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence or under
terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning
reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department,
Oxford University Press, at the address above
You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same
condition on any acquirer
Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press
198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
Data available
Library of Congress Control Number: 2022934362
ISBN 978–0–19–885996–3
ebook ISBN 978–0–19–260377–7
Printed in the UK by Ashford Colour Press Ltd, Gosport, Hampshire
Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and for information only.
Oxford disclaims any responsibility for the materials contained in any third party website
referenced in this work.
Contents

Foreword by Neil Badmington

List of illustrations

1 Creatures of difference

2 Difference and culture

3 The differed subject

4 Difference or truth?

5 Difference in the world

6 Dissent

Glossary

References

Further reading

Index
Foreword

Catherine Belsey was making her final alterations to this second

edition of Poststructuralism: A Very Short Introduction in October
2020 when she suffered a stroke at home in Cambridge. She spent
the next few months in hospital before being moved to a hospice,
where she died on the morning of 14 February 2021.

Eighteen months earlier, Kate asked me out of the blue if I would

oversee her literary affairs following her death. I protested that an
immortal had no need of such an earthly arrangement, but she took
from my hands the copy of Tales of the Troubled Dead with which
she had just presented me. Retrieving a pen from her handbag, she
wrote a message inside the cover of the book: ‘For Neil, my literary
executor—for the record—from Kate.’ She assured me that she
would haunt me if I didn’t do my job properly.

For the record, I finalized the present text for publication at the
request of Kate’s family, using two sources: a file from Kate’s
computer and a typescript with handwritten annotations that was
found on her desk. ‘I know that I can no longer reach her’, writes
Joan Didion towards the end of Blue Nights, her memoir about the
death of her daughter. I knew—obviously, painfully, daily—that I
could no longer reach Kate while I was settling her sentences for
print, so I turned at times for advice to Julia Thomas, Irene Morra,
Laurence Totelin, Kim Gilchrist, and Becky Munford. Kate’s words can
now reach their readers in the form, I believe, that she desired. I
hope that she has no need to haunt me.

Neil Badmington,
Cardiff, July 2021
List of illustrations

1 Alice and Humpty Dumpty

Illustration by John Tenniel in Lewis Carroll’s Through the Looking Glass (Macmillan,
1940). Morphart Creation/Shutterstock

2 Linear A. Ancient Minoan script discovered by Sir Arthur Evans

From Scripta Minoa: The Written Documents of Minoan Crete. With Special Reference
to the Archives of Knossos Vol. 1, Oxford 1909

3 René Magritte, The Key to Dreams (1935)

© ADAGP, Paris and DACS, London 2021

4 Detail from Titian, Venus Blindfolding Cupid

Galleria Borghese, Rome

5 Jacques Derrida, Glas

© Jacques Derrida (University of Nebraska Press, 1986), trans. by John Leavey and
Richard Rand

6 Marcel Duchamp, Fountain

Tate Gallery, London. Ian Dagnall Computing/Alamy Stock Photo

7 Chappatte, Carbon Footprint

© Chappatte, The New York Times, <www.chappatte.com>

8 Pieter de Hooch, A Courtyard of a House in Delft

National Gallery, London. World History Archive/Alamy Stock Photo

9 M. C. Escher, Belvedere
The M. C. Escher Company. All M. C. Escher works © Cordon Art-Baarn-the
Netherlands. Used by permission. All rights reserved
Chapter 1
Creatures of difference

When Lewis Carroll’s Humpty Dumpty discusses the question of

meaning with Alice, which one of them is right?

In Through the Looking Glass Humpty Dumpty engages Alice in one

argument after another, just as if dialogue were a competition (see
Figure 1). Having demonstrated to his own satisfaction, if not Alice’s,
that unbirthday presents are to be preferred because people can
have them more often, he adds triumphantly, ‘There’s glory for you!’
1. Alice and Humpty Dumpty. Which of them is right?

Torn between the desire to placate him and good common sense,
Alice rejoins, ‘I don’t know what you mean by “glory”.’ So Humpty
Dumpty explains:

‘I meant “there’s a nice knock-down argument for you!”’

‘But “glory” doesn’t mean “a nice knock-down argument”,’ Alice objected.
‘When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty said in a rather scornful tone, ‘it
means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.’
 ‘The question is,’ said Alice, ‘whether you can make words mean so many
different things.’
‘The question is,’ said Humpty Dumpty, ‘which is to be Master—that’s all.’

Alice’s scepticism is surely justified? Meaning is not at our disposal,

or we could never communicate with others. We learn our native
language and, in the process, internalize the meanings other people
exchange. Small children find out from those who already know how
to distinguish ducks from squirrels: ducks are the ones that fly. And
children make mistakes: aeroplanes fly, but they are not ducks. Glory
is not a nice knock-down argument.

Language makes conversation possible, but only to the degree that

we use it appropriately, reproducing the meanings already in
circulation. As this dialogue demonstrates, there is no such thing as
a private language. Humpty Dumpty has to ‘translate’ his before he
can communicate with Alice.

Language and knowledge

Understood in the broad sense of the term to embrace all signifying
systems, including images and symbols, language gives us access to
information. Command of a new knowledge very often amounts to
learning the appropriate use of a new vocabulary and syntax. To the
extent that people understand economics, they demonstrate the fact
by using its terms and arranging them in an appropriate order. A
grasp of psychoanalysis means the ability to exchange words like
‘unconscious’, ‘repression’, or ‘transference’. Mathematics, science,
and logic have their own symbolic systems, and qualified
practitioners are those who know how to inhabit them. The
examination system is above all a way of policing the profession,
making sure that those who qualify to join it know how its language
or symbols are conventionally deployed.
Film directors and advertisers, meanwhile, know the meanings
conveyed by pictures of cute children or sleek kitchens. Language in
this broad sense is also a source of social values. In learning to use
words like ‘democracy’ and ‘dictatorship’ appropriately, for instance,
Western children learn about political systems, but they also absorb
as they do so the value their culture invests in these respective
forms of government. For better or worse, Western children learn
early on, without having to be explicitly taught, that dictatorship is
oppressive and democracy so precious that it is worth fighting for. In
many cultures, the flag is the visual indicator of a national identity
that must be defended—by force, if necessary.

Language and cultural change

If language, broadly understood, transmits the knowledges and
values that constitute a culture, it follows that the existing meanings
are not ours to command. And yet is it possible that the disdainful
Humpty Dumpty has a point after all? To reproduce existing
meanings exactly is also to reaffirm the knowledges our culture
takes for granted, and the values that precede us—the norms,
therefore, of the previous generation. Examination papers in
economics, mathematics, or media studies are set and marked by
existing practitioners, experts in the field, whose job it is to mark
down misunderstandings and misuses of the conventional
vocabulary.

In that respect, meanings exercise a degree of control when they

inculcate obedience to the discipline inscribed in them. And this is by
no means purely institutional, or confined to the educational
process. A generation ago campaigners for women’s rights
recognized (not for the first time) the degree to which ‘woman’
meant domesticity, nurturing, dependence, and the ways in which
anti-feminist jokes, for instance, reproduced the stereotypes of the
helpless little girl or the ageing harridan. The question feminists
confronted was precisely who was to be Master, as Humpty Dumpty
puts it.

In this particular case, however, his formulation was self-evidently

not one we could adopt. The term ‘Master’ would hardly help the
feminist cause, but ‘Mistress’ would not easily take its place, since it
carried sexual connotations that detracted from the authority we
were looking for. The right word in a new situation does not always
readily present itself. Language sometimes seems to lead a life of its
own. Words are unruly: ‘They’ve a temper, some of them,’ Humpty
Dumpty goes on to observe.

In this case the masculine and feminine values were not symmetrical
—and nor, of course, was the culture. Without supposing this was
the only change necessary, we set out to modify the language,
annoying conservatives with coinages like ‘spokesperson’ and ‘s/he’.
We refused to laugh at misogyny, and ignored the taunts that we
had no sense of humour.

Campaigners against racism, too, know that dialogue can become

the kind of competition Humpty Dumpty’s words parodied. Perhaps
in a way it always is. We rightly reproach our politicians when their
chosen vocabulary inflames existing conflicts.

Language is not in any sense personal or private. But it offers

options and individuals can alter it, as long as others adopt their
changes. What, after all, do great poets, philosophers, and scientists
do, but change our vocabulary? Shakespeare invented hundreds of
words. Developing disciplines do the same. In the course of the 20th
century, science progressively named ‘electrons’, ‘protons’, ‘neutrons’,
and ‘quarks’, not to mention dark matter and black holes. A new
pandemic appears and, in no time, native speakers of English find
themselves discussing ‘social distancing’ and ‘self-isolation’, as well
as Covid-19.
Poststructuralism is difficult to the extent that its practitioners use
old words in unfamiliar ways, or fresh terms to say what cannot be
said otherwise. This novel vocabulary still elicits some resistance, but
the issue we confront is how far we should let the existing language
impose limits on what it is possible to think.

Poststructuralism and language

Poststructuralism groups a number of disparate theories concerning
the relationship between human beings, the world, and the practice
of making, reproducing, and challenging meanings. While these
speculations differ from one another in important respects, they
begin from certain common assumptions. On the one hand,
poststructuralists affirm, consciousness is not the origin of the
language we speak and the images we recognize, so much as the
product of the meanings we learn and reproduce. On the other
hand, communication changes all the time, with or without
intervention from us, and we can choose to intervene with a view to
altering the meanings—which is to say the norms and values—our
culture takes for granted. The question is the one Humpty Dumpty
poses: who is to be in control?

This very short introduction will trace some of the arguments that
have led poststructuralists to question traditional theories of
language and culture, and with them customary accounts of what it
is possible to know, as well as what it is to be a human being.
Poststructuralism offers a range of ways to consider our place in the
world that compete with conventional explanations.

The importance of language

Most of the time the language we speak is barely visible to us. We
are more concerned with what it can do: describe our symptoms;
induce the neighbours to keep the noise down; get us off the hook
when we’ve done something bad. And yet few issues are more
important in human life. After the food and shelter that are
necessary to survival, language and its visual analogues exercise the
most crucial determinations in our social relations, our thought
processes, and our understanding of who and what we are.

Even food and shelter themselves do not come into our lives
undefined. Menus that offer ‘luscious, slow-roasted aubergine,
infused with zingy tamarind sauce’ may take this principle to
extremes, but for me, I remember, ‘scrag end stew’ was a lost cause
from the beginning.

Houses, too, are characterized in language, and not only by estate

agents. We might want to live in one we could justifiably call old or
quaint, modern or minimalist, but might feel less enthusiastic once
we had thought of it as decrepit, poky, brash, or bleak. Paint
manufacturers know that we are more likely to coat our walls in a
colour marketed as ‘Morning Sun’ than one called ‘Custard’, even if
the pigmentation is exactly the same.

In this sense language intervenes between human beings and their

world. A party game involves blindfolding one player as a prelude to
guessing what foods are placed on his or her tongue. Whether
consciously or not, guessing means classifying in accordance with
the system of differences the language already provides: is it sweet
or savoury? hot or cold? bland or bitter?

Poststructuralists share the view that the distinctions we make are

not necessarily given by the world around us, but are instead
produced by the symbolic systems we learn. How else would we
know the difference between pixies and gnomes, or March Hares,
Cheshire Cats, and talking eggs? But we learn our native tongue at
such an early age that it seems transparent, a window onto a world
of things, even if some of those things are in practice imaginary, no
more than ideas of things, derived from children’s stories.
Are ideas the source of meaning, then? That was once the
conventional view, but our ideas are not, poststructuralists believe,
the origin of the language we speak. Indeed, the reverse is the case.
Ideas are the effect of the meanings we learn and reproduce. We
learned our idea of Humpty Dumpty (if we did) from nursery
rhymes, Lewis Carroll, and John Tenniel, who illustrated the Alice
books. In its account of how we become meaning animals, and the
role meaning plays in our understanding of the world,
poststructuralism represents a modern challenge to traditional
beliefs.

Meaning
What is meaning? Where do meanings came from? Perhaps the
question finds more focus in relation to a specific instance. What,
then, does the word ‘modern’ mean in the sentence at the end of
the last section? What precise timespan does ‘modern’ cover?

The answer seems to vary with the context. As a description of the

poststructuralist resistance to inherited convictions, it may mean
nothing much more specific than ‘new’. Modern history, on the other
hand, generally concerns the period since the 17th century. And yet
we think of modern languages as distinct from Latin and Greek,
while modern furniture almost certainly belongs to the 20th century
or later. In these instances ‘modern’ defines no common
chronological period: modern history belongs to about the last 400
years, modern languages to perhaps the last thousand, and modern
furniture to no more than the last hundred or so. The modern
challenge of poststructuralism itself is a product of roughly the last
half-century.

The term ‘modern’, in other words, has no positive content, but owes
its meaning to difference. What is modern is in these instances
respectively ‘not medieval’, ‘not ancient’, ‘not antique’, or simply ‘not
traditional’. But at least in all these cases ‘modern’ distinguishes a
period that is more recent than another. Modernism, however,
denoting a style in art and literature, and associated with the first
half of the 20th century, is probably no longer the latest thing, while
in the compound ‘postmodern’, sometimes used to define our own
era, modernity has explicitly become, paradoxically, a thing of the
past.

Nevertheless, although it seems to refer to no constant period, we

are usually able to understand and use the word ‘modern’ without
difficulty. How? In the Course in General Linguistics, first published
in 1916, the Swiss linguist Ferdinand de Saussure proposed that ‘in
language there are only differences without positive terms’, and this
observation initiated a train of thought that would be taken up by a
succession of figures in a range of disciplines during the course of
the following century. Poststructuralism begins from Saussure’s
account of how we are able to exchange meanings, and goes on to
conceive of human beings as animals possessing this capability to an
exceptional degree. Insofar as language is formative, we are
creatures of difference.

In the book that did most to provide a starting point for the theories
that will be our concern, Saussure proposed that meaning did not
depend on reference to the world, or even to ideas. On the contrary.
He argued that, if the things or concepts language named already
existed outside it, words would have exact equivalents from one
language to another, and translation would be easy. But as all
translators know, nothing could be further from the case. ‘Toto, sois
sage,’ we dutifully intoned in my French class when I was 11, ‘Toto,
be good.’ But even at that early stage we sensed that sage and
‘good’ were not always interchangeable. ‘A good time’ in French, we
knew, would not be sage at all, since the term implied sense or
wisdom. We were, in addition, using a mode of address that had no
English translation. The second person singular that exists in so
many European languages (tu, Du) can cause native speakers of
English embarrassment when we try to communicate in other
tongues, since it carries values of intimacy or hierarchy which may
give offence in the wrong places.

Genders and tenses do not necessarily correspond from one

language to another. The morning is masculine in French (le matin),
feminine in Italian (la mattina). French has the past historic, a
special tense for telling stories. Some languages have more than one
plural form. Differences that are given in one language have to be
mastered, often with difficulty, by those whose mother tongue
divides up the world in another way.

We are compelled to conclude either that some languages

misrepresent the way things are, while our own describes the world
accurately, or that language, which seems to name units given in
nature, does not in practice depend on reference to things, or even
to our ideas of things. Instead, the units that seem to exist so
unproblematically may be differentiated from one another by
language itself, so that we think of them as natural, just as we may
perceive the continuous spectrum of the rainbow in terms of seven
distinct colours.

A century ago many European nations were ready to impose their

own classifications on other cultures, where imperial conquest made
this possible. But the multicultural societies that have resulted from
the decline of empire are willing to be more generous in their
recognition of other accounts of the world, which is to say, other
networks of differences.

A mother tongue represents a way of understanding the world, of

differentiating between things and relating them to one another.
Culture is inscribed in language. The Kenyan writer Ngugi wa
Thiong’o wrote his first works of fiction in English. Later, it came to
seem to him that this practice conceded too much to the influence of
the former colonial power, and the continued economic and cultural
neo-colonialism of the West. However African the content and
themes of his early novels, the novel itself was a European genre, its
structure reproducing a Western pattern of thought. Moreover, the
English language could not do justice to Kenyan perceptions of the
world. He then began to write in Gikuyu, drawing on indigenous
forms of narrative and drama.

Difference, not reference

People fluent in more than one language tend to agree that each
tongue offers a distinctive take on things. The simple inference that
meaning is differential, not referential, has profound implications for
our understanding of the relations between human beings and the
world. Poststructuralism evolved as Saussure’s account of meaning
was taken up by later generations, especially in France when, after
the Second World War, the history of Nazism—and of collaboration
with it in occupied France—seemed to demand an explanation that
existing theories of culture were unable to provide. The key term in
the development of poststructuralism is Saussure’s ‘difference’.

Saussure and the sign

Traditionally, words had been thought of as signs. The sign seemed
to represent (re-present) a presence that existed elsewhere, to
stand as the sign of something. In everyday English we still refer to
the meaning ‘behind’ the words, as if meaning existed somewhere
on the other side of speech or writing. Saussure’s work changed
that. For him meaning resides in the sign and nowhere else.

In order to make the point clear, he divided the sign in two: on the
one hand, the signifier, the sound or the visual appearance of the
word, phrase, or image in question; on the other, the signified, its
meaning. In ordinary circumstances the distinction is purely
methodological. We rarely see a signifier which does not signify, or
mean something. But an unknown language consists entirely of
signifiers in isolation. We hear sounds and assume that they signify,
since we see native speakers apparently conversing, but to us they
mean nothing. Or we see a page of impenetrable written characters.
Ancient artefacts unearthed in the 1890s at Knossos on Crete bore
Minoan writings that no one at the time could read. In the 1950s,
the latest script, known as Linear B, was deciphered, invested with
meaning. But Linear A still consists mainly of signifiers that no longer
signify to us (see Figure 2).

2. Ancient signifiers that mostly no longer signify.

If you don’t happen to know Greek, this is a pure signifier:

λóγος
In its written form it makes this shape; spoken aloud, it makes a
particular sound: logos. And if you do know Greek, it brings with it a
signified that has no exact equivalent in English, but ranges between
‘word’, ‘account’, ‘meaning’, and ‘thought’. Changing the shape very
slightly—and silently—by capitalizing the initial letter, we turn it into
Λóγος and the signified changes to something like ‘God’ or ‘Reason’.

Signifiers

Q. Why use the jargon term, ‘signifier’? Why not just say ‘word’?

A. Because words are not the only signifiers. Traffic lights, arrows, and
crossing indicators signify. So do gestures: pointing, shaking hands,
punching the air. Yawns, gasps, and screams are all signifiers—in the
sense that they may be interpreted by those around us, even if that was
not what we intended. Paintings signify. Sometimes a group of words
constitutes one signifier: ‘How are you?’ is not most usefully broken down
into its component words; rather, it represents a single greeting, registers
an interest—and probably doesn’t in practice invite a list of symptoms,
except in the doctor’s surgery.

Neither element of the sign determines the other: the signifier does
not ‘express’ the meaning, nor does the signified ‘resemble’ the form
or sound. On the contrary, the relationship between signifier and
signified is arbitrary. There is nothing doggy about the word ‘dog’.
There can’t be, since the French recognize much the same
characteristics in un chien. Even in languages with a shared
European history, Schwein, maiale, porc, and pig have more or less
the same signified. Children learn to distinguish the meaning when
they learn the signifier. To use a term appropriately is to know what
it means.

Grown-ups go on learning new signifiers, and the process is

nowhere clearer than in the realm of ideas. Most people do not have
the idea of poststructuralism first, and then go on to discover the
name. Instead, now that the term exists, we learn how to use it
appropriately in the course of internalizing its meaning. ‘Whether we
take the signified or the signifier’, Saussure argues, ‘language has
neither ideas nor sounds that existed before the linguistic system,
but only conceptual and phonic differences that have issued from
the system.’

Ferdinand de Saussure, 1857–1913

Professor of Linguistics in Paris, he moved to the University of Geneva in

1906, where he began to give the lectures that would constitute the
Course in General Linguistics (1916). Dissatisfied with the conventional
historical (diachronic) character of the discipline, Saussure chose to
analyse the workings of language in its existing (synchronic) form. If
objects or ideas were knowable outside the signifiers that distinguished
them from each other, Saussure argued, terms would have exact
equivalents from one language to another, but since translation is so often
a quest for approximations, meaning must depend on difference, not on
reference to things or concepts. The Course was put together by his
students after his death. Ironically, one of the figures who exerted the
most influence on what would evolve as poststructuralism was thus not in
the conventional sense the author of his own book.

René Magritte’s word-paintings wittily exploit the arbitrariness of the

relationship between the signifier and meaning. Children used to
learn to read from primers that showed pictures of things with their
names underneath, to teach them what the written signifier meant.
Magritte’s The Key to Dreams (1935) shows four such pictures, but
only the last, ‘the valise’, is appropriately labelled (see Figure 3).
3. René Magritte’s The Key to Dreams parodies a reading primer. Is it
also a visual-verbal ‘poem’?

Suppose ‘bird’ really signified ‘jug’. What difference would it make?

Any, or none? Magritte places his misnamed objects against what
the frame indicates are window panes. But these panes are painted
black; the window is opaque; it does not allow us to see a world of
things on the other side of it. Both name and object are on the same
side of the glass, if glass it is. Here language is not a window onto
the world.
Or perhaps, instead, Magritte’s window should be seen as a
blackboard, traditional source of instruction about the world, where
the words are chalked below the images? If so, it is surely an ironic
one: the children in this class are being grossly misled. While it
parodies a reading lesson, does The Key to Dreams also offer a
sideways glance at Sigmund Freud’s Interpretation of Dreams? The
French titles of the painting and the book differ but Freud’s work
promises to unlock unexpected meanings for the objects that appear
in sleep.

But then again, is there irony here at all? Common sense would say
so, but common sense did not do justice to Humpty Dumpty, who
turned out to have a point, however improbably. Perhaps The Key to
Dreams treats its words and images as two kinds of signifiers, one
textual, the other pictorial? Isolated visual signifiers are familiar to
us, after all, in the form of road signs or brand logos. What are
paintings themselves, but assemblages of visual signifiers?

If we read the picture that way, we could create our own

connections between the sets of signifiers in Magritte’s painting. Is
there an unforeseen parallel between time and the wind, both in
flight, both imperceptible? Or could this door, half-enclosing a wistful
horse, be a stable door? Is there an untold story here? The painting
does not answer either question; instead, it keeps its options open
or, in poststructuralist terms, doesn’t close down on a final signified.

The primacy of the signifier

Poetry, too, works by proposing parallels, inviting the reader to make
unexpected connections between apparently distinct signifiers. Amy
Lowell’s Imagist poem ‘Wind and Silver’ draws an analogy that
depends on the conjunction of unpredictability with visual
appropriateness:

Greatly shining,
The Autumn moon floats in the thin sky;
And the fish-ponds shake their backs and flash their dragon scales
As she passes over them.

And yet, you might object, this moon and these fish-ponds are more
than signifiers. Surely they exist, as things? We ‘see’ their referents
in their absence, in our mind’s eye, and that is the source of any
pleasure we derive from the poem.

Yes, in a way. But what the poem does is isolate these images from
the ‘noise’ that would surround them in actuality, pausing them for
contemplation. The signifier condenses and separates off the
comparison it creates from the distinct experience as it might exist in
a world of reference, and in the process generates an association—
the ethereal effect of the extra-bright harvest moon moving above
water—that surely relegates the ponds themselves to the very edges
of our interest. The uncanny impression depends (of course) on
differences—between night and day, the heavens and the earth—
brought into question, as the strange light transforms the mundane.
There is nothing referential about a sky described as ‘thin’ or pools
of water rendered as creatures from an ancient mythology stirred
into vivid life.

That haunting quality is also an effect of the fact that we read these
words as poetry: the four lines isolated on the white space of the
page; the sound patterns made up of successive monosyllables, and
the near-rhymes, ‘shining’ and ‘sky’, ‘shake’ and ‘scales’, ‘backs’ and
‘flash’. Rhythm plays its part too, the two short lines enclosing the
long ones, the longest alone devoted to the surprise transformation
of the ponds. While the modernist poem breaks with traditional
English metres, its own smooth flow, anything but prosaic, owes a
debt to Japanese haiku.

Julia Kristeva calls this signifying capability that is not derived from
the meanings of the words ‘the semiotic’. It evokes, she maintains,
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
Falle der Stimmengleichheit entscheidet die Stimme des
Vorsitzenden, bei Wahlen das Los.
Abstimmungen des Gesamt-Vorstandes und des
geschäftsführenden Vorstandes können auch auf schriftlichem Weg
erfolgen.

§ 17.
Änderungen dieser allgemeinen Satzung, sowie des
Vereinszweckes kann die Hauptversammlung mit einer Mehrheit von
drei Viertel der Anwesenden beschließen.

VII. Auflösung des Vereins

§ 18.
Zur Auflösung des Vereins bedarf es des übereinstimmenden und
jedesmal von wenigstens vier Fünftel der erschienenen Mitglieder
gefaßten Beschlusses zweier mindestens vier Wochen
auseinanderliegender Hauptversammlungen. Der Antrag auf
Auflösung muß wenigstens drei Monate vor der Versammlung beim
Gesamt-Vorstande schriftlich angebracht und öffentlich durch die
»Sächsische Staatszeitung« bekannt gemacht werden.

§ 19.
Im Falle der Auflösung wird das Vereinsvermögen dem
Gesamtministerium zur freien Verfügung überwiesen.

§ 20.
Die am 14. Juli 1908 errichtete Satzung ist am 15. Mai 1909, 15.
Mai 1911, 8. Mai 1912 und am 1. September 1919 abgeändert und
am 1. September 1923 in vorliegender Fassung neu errichtet
worden.
Dresden, am 1. September 1923.

Lehmannsche Buchdruckerei, Dresden-N.

 Weitere Anmerkungen zur Transkription
Offensichtliche Fehler wurden stillschweigend korrigiert. Unterschiedliche
Schreibweisen von Ortsnamen wurden beibehalten. Die Darstellung der Ellipsen
wurde vereinheitlicht.
 *** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK
LANDESVEREIN SÄCHSISCHER HEIMATSCHUTZ —
MITTEILUNGEN BAND XIII, HEFT 5-6 ***

Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions

will be renamed.

Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S.

copyright law means that no one owns a United States copyright
in these works, so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and
distribute it in the United States without permission and without
paying copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General
Terms of Use part of this license, apply to copying and
distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works to protect the
PROJECT GUTENBERG™ concept and trademark. Project
Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if
you charge for an eBook, except by following the terms of the
trademark license, including paying royalties for use of the
Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for
copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is
very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such
as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
research. Project Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and
printed and given away—you may do practically ANYTHING in
the United States with eBooks not protected by U.S. copyright
law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark license, especially
commercial redistribution.

START: FULL LICENSE

THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
 PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK

To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the

free distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this
work (or any other work associated in any way with the phrase
“Project Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of
the Full Project Gutenberg™ License available with this file or
online at www.gutenberg.org/license.

Section 1. General Terms of Use and

Redistributing Project Gutenberg™
electronic works
1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™
electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand,
agree to and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual
property (trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to
abide by all the terms of this agreement, you must cease using
and return or destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™
electronic works in your possession. If you paid a fee for
obtaining a copy of or access to a Project Gutenberg™
electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the terms
of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.

1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only

be used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by
people who agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement.
There are a few things that you can do with most Project
Gutenberg™ electronic works even without complying with the
full terms of this agreement. See paragraph 1.C below. There
are a lot of things you can do with Project Gutenberg™
electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement and
help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg™
electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the
Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the
collection of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the
individual works in the collection are in the public domain in the
United States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright
law in the United States and you are located in the United
States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from copying,
distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative works
based on the work as long as all references to Project
Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope that you will
support the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting free
access to electronic works by freely sharing Project
Gutenberg™ works in compliance with the terms of this
agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg™ name
associated with the work. You can easily comply with the terms
of this agreement by keeping this work in the same format with
its attached full Project Gutenberg™ License when you share it
without charge with others.

1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside
the United States, check the laws of your country in addition to
the terms of this agreement before downloading, copying,
displaying, performing, distributing or creating derivative works
based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The
Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright
status of any work in any country other than the United States.

1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project

Gutenberg:

1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other

immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must
appear prominently whenever any copy of a Project
Gutenberg™ work (any work on which the phrase “Project
Gutenberg” appears, or with which the phrase “Project
Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed,
viewed, copied or distributed:

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United

States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it
away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg
License included with this eBook or online at
www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United
States, you will have to check the laws of the country where
you are located before using this eBook.

1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is

derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to
anyone in the United States without paying any fees or charges.
If you are redistributing or providing access to a work with the
phrase “Project Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the
work, you must comply either with the requirements of
paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use
of the work and the Project Gutenberg™ trademark as set forth
in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is

posted with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and
distribution must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through
1.E.7 and any additional terms imposed by the copyright holder.
Additional terms will be linked to the Project Gutenberg™
License for all works posted with the permission of the copyright
holder found at the beginning of this work.

1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project

Gutenberg™ License terms from this work, or any files
containing a part of this work or any other work associated with
Project Gutenberg™.
 1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute
this electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1
with active links or immediate access to the full terms of the
Project Gutenberg™ License.

1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form,
including any word processing or hypertext form. However, if
you provide access to or distribute copies of a Project
Gutenberg™ work in a format other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or
other format used in the official version posted on the official
Project Gutenberg™ website (www.gutenberg.org), you must, at
no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a copy, a
means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
request, of the work in its original “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other
form. Any alternate format must include the full Project
Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.

1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,

performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™
works unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or

providing access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™
electronic works provided that:

• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
 about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”

• You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who

notifies you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that
s/he does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™
License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and
discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of Project
Gutenberg™ works.

• You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of

any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in
the electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90
days of receipt of the work.

• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.

1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project

Gutenberg™ electronic work or group of works on different
terms than are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain
permission in writing from the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation, the manager of the Project Gutenberg™
trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3
below.

1.F.

1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend

considerable effort to identify, do copyright research on,
transcribe and proofread works not protected by U.S. copyright
law in creating the Project Gutenberg™ collection. Despite
these efforts, Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, and the
medium on which they may be stored, may contain “Defects,”
such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or corrupt
data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other
medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
cannot be read by your equipment.

1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES -

Except for the “Right of Replacement or Refund” described in
paragraph 1.F.3, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation, the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
and any other party distributing a Project Gutenberg™ electronic
work under this agreement, disclaim all liability to you for
damages, costs and expenses, including legal fees. YOU
AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE,
STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH
OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH
1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER
THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR
ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE
OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF
THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.

1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If

you discover a defect in this electronic work within 90 days of
receiving it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any) you
paid for it by sending a written explanation to the person you
received the work from. If you received the work on a physical
medium, you must return the medium with your written
explanation. The person or entity that provided you with the
defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu
of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or
entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund.
If the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund
in writing without further opportunities to fix the problem.

1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set

forth in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’,
WITH NO OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS
OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR
ANY PURPOSE.

1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied

warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this
agreement violates the law of the state applicable to this
agreement, the agreement shall be interpreted to make the
maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by the applicable
state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of
this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.

1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the

Foundation, the trademark owner, any agent or employee of the
Foundation, anyone providing copies of Project Gutenberg™
electronic works in accordance with this agreement, and any
volunteers associated with the production, promotion and
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, harmless
from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, that
arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project
Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or
deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any Defect
you cause.

Section 2. Information about the Mission of

Project Gutenberg™
Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of
electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new
computers. It exists because of the efforts of hundreds of
volunteers and donations from people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the

assistance they need are critical to reaching Project
Gutenberg™’s goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™
collection will remain freely available for generations to come. In
2001, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was
created to provide a secure and permanent future for Project
Gutenberg™ and future generations. To learn more about the
Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and how your
efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 and the
Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.

Section 3. Information about the Project

Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-
profit 501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the
laws of the state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by
the Internal Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal
tax identification number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the
Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation are tax
deductible to the full extent permitted by U.S. federal laws and
your state’s laws.

The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500

West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact
links and up to date contact information can be found at the
Foundation’s website and official page at
www.gutenberg.org/contact

Section 4. Information about Donations to

the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation
Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without
widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission
of increasing the number of public domain and licensed works
that can be freely distributed in machine-readable form
accessible by the widest array of equipment including outdated
equipment. Many small donations ($1 to $5,000) are particularly
important to maintaining tax exempt status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws

regulating charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of
the United States. Compliance requirements are not uniform
and it takes a considerable effort, much paperwork and many
fees to meet and keep up with these requirements. We do not
solicit donations in locations where we have not received written
confirmation of compliance. To SEND DONATIONS or
determine the status of compliance for any particular state visit
www.gutenberg.org/donate.

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states

where we have not met the solicitation requirements, we know
of no prohibition against accepting unsolicited donations from
donors in such states who approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot

make any statements concerning tax treatment of donations
received from outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp
our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current

donation methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a
number of other ways including checks, online payments and
credit card donations. To donate, please visit:
www.gutenberg.org/donate.

Section 5. General Information About Project

Gutenberg™ electronic works
Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could
be freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose
network of volunteer support.

Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several

printed editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by
copyright in the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus,
we do not necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any
particular paper edition.

Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.

This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™,

including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new
eBooks, and how to subscribe to our email newsletter to hear
about new eBooks.
back