Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Code of Civil Procedure
Code of Civil Procedure
in consultation with the learned advocates appearing for the parties to enable
them to adjust their calendar. Once the date of trial is fixed, the trial should
proceed accordingly to the extent possible, on day-to-day basis. (Para 2
(v)) Yashpal Jain v. Sushila Devi, 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 916 : 2023 INSC 948
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Civil Trial - Trial judges of District and
Taluka Courts shall as far as possible maintain the diary for ensuring that only
such number of cases as can be handled on any given day for trial and complete
the recording of evidence so as to avoid overcrowding of the cases and as a
sequence of it would result in adjournment being sought and thereby preventing
any inconvenience being caused to the stakeholders. (Para 2 (vi)) Yashpal Jain
v. Sushila Devi, 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 916 : 2023 INSC 948
Also Read - Four Conditions To Invoke Section 27 Of Indian Evidence Act :
Supreme Court Explains
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Delay in civil trial - The statistics relating to
the cases pending in each court beyond 5 years shall be forwarded by every
presiding officer to the Principal District Judge once in a month who (Principal
District Judge/District Judge) shall collate the same and forward it to the review
committee constituted by the respective High Courts for enabling it to take
further steps. (Para 2 (x)) Yashpal Jain v. Sushila Devi, 2023 LiveLaw (SC)
916 : 2023 INSC 948
Also Read - Supreme Court Asks State To Pay Salaries To Teachers Appointed
Over Sanctioned Posts; Says They Weren't At Fault
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Delay in civil trial - The Committee so
constituted by the Hon'ble Chief Justice of the respective States shall meet at
least once in two months and direct such corrective measures to be taken by
concerned court as deemed fit and shall also monitor the old cases (preferably
which are pending for more than 05 years) constantly. (Para 2 (xii)) Yashpal
Jain v. Sushila Devi, 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 916 : 2023 INSC 948
Also Read - Supreme Court Annual Digest 2023-Code Of Criminal Procedure
(CrPC)
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Suit for Declaration - In a dispute with respect
to determination of title, merely pointing out the lacunae in the defendant's title
would not suffice. Having instituted the suit for declaration, the burden of proof
rested on the shoulders of the plaintiff to reasonably establish the probability of
better title, which the plaintiff in the present case, has manifestly failed to
do. (Para 22) P. Kishore Kumar v. Vittal K. Patkar, 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 999 :
2023 INSC 1009
Also Read - 'Custody' Under S.27 Evidence Act Doesn't Mean Custody After
Formal Arrest; Includes Any Kind Of Restraint Or Surveillance: Supreme Court
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Suit for Declaration - Revenue records are not
documents of title. The Trial Court erred in decreeing the suit by placing on a
higher probative pedestal the revenue entries. (Para 11 - 27) P. Kishore Kumar
v. Vittal K. Patkar, 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 999 : 2023 INSC 1009
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - there is no difference between a party to a suit
as a witness and a witness simpliciter - Production of documents for both a
party to the suit and a witness as the case may be, at the stage of cross-
examination, is permissible within law. (Para 32) Mohammed Abdul Wahid v.
Nilofer, 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 1061 : 2023 INSC 1075
Order 41 Rule 5 - Stay by Appellate Court. Stay by Court which passed the
decree.
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Order 41 Rule 5 - Unless the appeal is listed
and there is an interim order, the mere filing of the appeal would not operate as
a stay. Sanjiv Kumar Singh v. State of Bihar, 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 63