January 30, 2024

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY | TRADEMARK

Food for Thought: IP Protection in the Indian

Food Industry

pU ngiS
   

Essenese Obhan English

 Sannidhi Mahapatra
Introduction

Food is a language that connects everyone worldwide. Cuisines change every few hundred
miles, food habits and preferences vary with the climate, and families have their own
culinary secrets that get passed on from generation to generation. Everyone has something

pU ngiS
to share and protect. It comes as no surprise, therefore, that the commercial food industry is
so crowded and heavily contested. But, as with any form of business, the food industry is
also not immune to risks, including from counterfeiters and imitators.

Food can be protected in many ways, including through intellectual property. IP protection
in the food industry in India is complex and can include several options, such as trademarks,
trade dress, trade secrets, patents, and copyright. For this note, we highlight some aspects
of trademark protections that are available in the food industry in India.

A brand is often the prime determinant of the success of a food company, food product, or a
restaurant. With increasing commercialisation, food has become a lot less about the taste
and more about how it appears. Consequently, it has become necessary for chefs,
restaurant owners, QSR companies or FMCG companies to create unique identities and
brand recall for their products among consumers.

Protection under Trademark Law

Under trademark law, a brand can protect several aspects of its business. These include
traditional or conventional elements such as names, recipes, taglines or logos. Protection is
also granted for non-conventional aspects such as shapes, store layouts and decor, and
motion marks.

Under the international classification of goods, a brand owner can apply for a trademark
under several classes for different categories of food, e.g., Class 29 for ‘Dairy, poultry,
etc.’[E.g.: ‘’ for milk and dairy products]; Class 30 for ‘Food products like rice, coffee,
chocolates, flour, etc.’[E.g.: ‘’ for coffee, ‘Cadbury’ for chocolates, ‘’ for biscuits]; Class 32 for
‘Beers, water and non-alcoholic drinks’[E.g.: for beers, mineral water, etc., ‘Bisleri’ for drinking
water, soda, etc.]; Class 43 for ‘Services of food and drinks’[E.g.: , Café Coffee Day, ].

Protection of Traditional Trademarks

English
To register a trademark in India, one must follow the process outlined by the Trade Marks
Act, 1999 (“the Act”), which includes selecting a unique and distinctive name, logo, or slogan
for the food item, conducting a trademark search to ensure that the chosen name, logo, or
slogan is available for use, filing a trademark application with the appropriate office, and
awaiting final office approval for the application.

Once a brand obtains registration for its name, tagline or logo, it is granted exclusive rights
to use the trademark in connection with its applied class of goods or services in the country.
Such use can help build brand recognition and gain competitive advantage. A food product
or dish may be protected under trademark law if it has acquired a distinctive name (e.g.,
‘Oreo’), logo (e.g.,), tagline (e.g., ‘Amul: The taste of India’) or other identifying feature that
distinguishes it from other similar products in the market.

In the case of Impresario Entertainment & Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s. Urban Masala LLP
[I.A. 7447/2017 in CS(COMM) 441/2017, order dated 10 July 2017], the Delhi High Court
granted an interim injunction to the plaintiffs restraining the opposite party from the use of

pU ngiS
the trademark “SOCIAL”. The Court noted that the word ‘Social’ is arbitrary with respect to
restaurants, and terming it generic would be prejudicial to the party which owns such mark.

Protection of Recipes

Unique and original recipes created by individuals can be protected under different kinds of
intellectual property, including patents, copyrights or trade secrets. Protection may be
sought under patent law for innovative recipes, methods of production or for the structure of
food and confectionary products so long as they meet the requirements under Section 3 of
the Patent Act, 1970. For instance, in 2020, homemaker Shubhangi Patil, was granted a
patent for her recipe of ragi walnut soup. However, in case the product fails to come under
the purview of patentability, one can write a cookbook with the recipe and get a copyright
for the published book. Therefore, even though third parties may copy the food recipe, it will
still be recognised as an original and genuine work of the copyright holder. Further, recipes
also would qualify for protection as a trade secret. Popular brands such as KFC and Coca
Cola have protected their iconic recipes through trade secrets in order to avoid disclosure to
the public by way of patents or copyrights.

Protection of Non-traditional Marks

A trademark can also be obtained for non-traditional aspects of a business such as store
layout, décor, restaurant, food designs or shapes, sound or motion marks, etc.

In ITC v. Central Park Estates [2022 SCC OnLine Del 4132], the Delhi High Court held that
“BUKHARA” qualifies as a well-known trademark. The conglomerate ITC started the
‘Bukhara’ restaurant in the late 1970s and also acquired trademark registrations for the
Bukhara logo and word marks in 1985. The restaurant has a unique decor, wooden menus,
and a specially designed uniform for staff. The defendant set up a restaurant under the
name, Balkh Bukhara, and adopted several characteristics and features similar to that of
English
ITC’s Bukhara. Pursuant to the order, the defendant was injuncted from using the menu,
uniform, and cutlery, which were similar to ITC’s Bukhara.

Similarly, in Merwans Confectioners Pvt Ltd v. Sugar Street and Ors [IA No. 1 OF 2019 in
CS(L) No. 1100/2019, order dated 17 December 2019], the plaintiff, a well-known bakery in
Mumbai, obtained an injunction in the unique decor, layout and design of their store across
their 24 franchisees against M/s Sugar Street at the Bombay High Court. As per Merwans,
Sugar Street (their erstwhile franchise partner, and also engaged in a bakery business) had
infringed their rights by the use of similar brown tiles, store layout, décor and design, despite
their franchise agreement having lapsed.

It is also possible to register a shape mark to protect the unique shape of the food items
associated with any particular brand. In terms of protecting the shape of a food product or
dish, it has to be distinctive and non-functional. For example, the shape of Toblerone
chocolate bars has been registered as a trademark in several countries, including India.

pU ngiS
In Gorbatschow Wodka Kg v. John Distilleries Limited [2011 (47) PTC 100 (Bom)], the
Bombay High Court, while adjudicating on whether the unique shape of the Gorbatschow
Wodka bottle is eligible for trademark protection or not, observed that

“…Section 2(zb) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 defines the expression ‘trade mark’ to mean “a
mark capable of being represented graphically and which is capable of distinguishing the
goods or services of one person from those of others” and to include the ‘shape of goods,
their packaging and combination of colours’. Parliament has, therefore, statutorily
recognized that the shape in which goods are marketed, their packaging and combination of
colours form part of what is described as the trade dress.”

Even sound marks have proven to be effective in establishing brand recall value. Iconic
jingles and tunes composed for certain food brands have left lasting impressions on
consumers. Rule 26(5) of Trade Mark Rules, 2017 provides provisions for the registration of
the sound trademark, and Britannia Industries has registered its ‘Four note bell sound’ as a
sound trademark in India.

Motions involved in the culinary process have also been granted trademark protection. In
Europe, Nusret Gökçe (popularly known as ‘Salt Bae’) succeeded in registering a motion
trademark for a video of him sprinkling salt over the meat, which went viral in 2017.

Conclusion

The Indian food industry has immense potential in terms of developing and protecting
intellectual property. With the advent of globalization and rise of competition in the food
business, a lack of IP protection might lead to brand owners effectively serving up their
goodwill on a platter to counterfeiters and copycats. Brand owners must be proactive in
protecting their IP and think through the entire gamut of protections available and necessary
to ensure that their business and products remain secure.
English
 pU ngiS

English