Gulsher Khan-2681

21/03/2024
The House will remember that when this matter came up on the earlier bear to appoint the Joint
Committee. We had a fairly full and profitable discussion in this House. As a result the House
agreed to send this Bill to a Joint Committee. The other House went a step therefore and
unanimously agreed to send it to the Joint Committee. I mention this facts to show what a great
degree of unanimity of opinion. There has been the Parliament over this matter. We would
imagine sometime reading on hearing some criticism made outside this House. That this House a
measure over which opinion was yet in win that it was a highly controversial measure will
propose will extraordinary. Yet when one comes to see what has actually happened in this House
warrant House one find that the person. We must intimately connected with this matter. In the
sense that the their considering it directly members of the two Houses who are listened to
argument and against have come to one brought conclusions. Un fare of amendment of the
Constitution this should be remember because an attempt is made outside Parliament. Of course
to create a contrary impression. I am not saying nothing secret when I say that the proceeding of
the Joint Committee were remarkably for their cooperative approach for their problem. It was
just an understanding problem and under unanimous approach. The Bill has emerged from the
Joint Committee might be consider to represent the almost of every members of the Joint
Committee which considered of people of various party and various view. After all report of the
Joint Committee was prepared and past in this cooperative manner by almost every member of
the Joint Committee. Some minutes of dissent have been received. The minutes of dissent by my
friend as we major a longest minute in which he has credited and high Legal Authority apart
from that fact that it is himself of high Legal Authority. First of all we must bear in mind exactly
what this Bill is and what this attempt to amendment the constitution. It is odd that word like
confiscation and property and expropriation through about when actually what the Constitution
says is that their will be no such things except by Law and except by payment and compensation
their Law.
The quantum of compensation is to be determined by legislature the King has given many
quotation about due quotation by Law. First of all he has distinguished American Judge a great
desire to improve the public condition is not warrant desire by shorter cut then the Constitution
way.
I say that this is Constitutional way and what is proposed is the definite Legal and Constitution
doing it and we are very amending the Constitution in the Constitution way. I do not quite
understand this throwing about words like expropriation and confiscation and doing things apart
from Law. Remember that the sole major change propose clear one thing which was clear to us at
the time this Constitution who as it emerge Constitution Assembly. The quantum compensation
of the principals governing would be deciding by the legislature. This was made perfectly clear it
is conceive that those who friend failed is given expression to their wishes agree and thereby and
Supreme Court and some other great interpretete thing different way. The Supreme Court is the
Financial Authority for interprete Constitution. All I can say is that the Constitution was not wont
as previously of the famous Constitution intended. What the framers of the Constitution intended
if therefore any one to see. All that has been done now is to make that wording precise according
to and framers of the Constitution of it that time and made an openly said. I don not therefore
understand this measure of excitement and hesitation and peoples might not elsewhere about this
matter.
May I say straight away would I think what all respect that the Joint Committee has certainly
improve this Bill from what it was previously I accept this report and the recommendation
completely. Their might be one or two miner change but apart from that it would be a pretty
amendment this as has Joint Committee considerations. It is emerge as the House is the much
simpler forum. It is shorter and simpler then before and that before desirable. The slight change
in article 31 to makes point clear and as consequences has that change it is not necessary matter
there.