Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pegels 1969
Pegels 1969
A I I E Transactions
Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/uiie19
To cite this article: C. Carl Pegels (1969) A Blood Bank Collection Scheduling and Inventory Control System, A I I E
Transactions, 1:1, 51-55, DOI: 10.1080/05695556908974413
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained
in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no
representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of
the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors,
and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied
upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be
liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities
whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of
the use of the Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic
reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any
form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://
www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
A Blood Bank Collection Scheduling and
Inventory Control System1
C. CARL PEGELS
State University of New York at Buffalo
Abstract: This article presents an analytic approach to the MAlH BLOOD GROUPS
Downloaded by [New York University] at 06:31 06 February 2015
I
I March 1969 AIIE Transactions 51
that, if a shortage occurs, the blood bank will go into a and P ( l ) = P(2) = 2P/(n+2) and P(i) = O/(n+2) for
state of emergency, and is able to call in listed volunteer i = 3 , 4, . . . , n.
or paid donors to replenish blood of the group that is For reasonably large n, even for n = 8, the approxima-
short. For example, if the specified probability @ is set tion is very close to the actual value. The implication of
at 0.05, and if the planning period is one week, then, on this is important for our models because we can essen-
the average, a shortage would occur only five times in a tially ignore the question of how reasonable the assump-
two-year period. tion of independence implied by Equation 1 is.
In our model development, it will be assumed that the Before we move on to discuss the six cases, we shall
mean supply and demand rates are approximately briefly discuss demand forecasting. There appear to be
parallel during the whole planning period, and constant essentially two methods of forecasting demand. On the
for the major part of the planning period. This assump- one hand, we can forecast mean demand for individual
tion is quite reasonable because, during a planning period blood groups and use the Holt, et a1 method1 for estimat-
of one week, blood is typically drawn from Monday ing the standard deviations. On the other hand, we can
morning to Saturday noon, and the bulk of the blood de- forecast mean aggregate demand and base the individual
mand originates during weekdays from elective surgery blood group mean demand estimates on the respective
and therapy. Only accident cases on weekends would blood group fraction, pi,
tend to violate the above assumption.
To summarize then, the objective of the model is to
Downloaded by [New York University] at 06:31 06 February 2015
i=l
1 Research by Holt, Modigliani, Muth and Simon (2) has shown
that there is a relation between the st?ndard deviation of demand,
We can obtain approximate for the P(z?'s pro- and average demand. For one speclfic consumer product, they
vided it is known what relative probability each P(i) found that the following relation existed:
-
should have. For instance, if P ( l ) and P(2) should be U D = aD,
twice as large as the remaining P(i)'s, then an approxi- where uD is the standard deviation of demand, a is a parameter,
mate solution can be obtained by using the approximation and is average demand.
They also found that a somewhat better relationship could be
obtained by the relation
s = 2~ ( 4 ,
i=l
c41 v D = UP,
where a and b are parameters and b is somewhat less than unity.
I n this case it is assumed that only an aggregate mean The z-value must be chosen so that Equation 2 is satisfied.
demand forecast, B, can be obtained. Forecasts of in- After having determined the Xis for all blood groups,
dividual blood group mean demands are not available. we can find X by summing the Xi's. If X<X1, select
However, for a perfect forecast of D, we can obtain the another X I X and recalculate X. Repeat until X=X1.
expected value of Di: Similarly, if X> X', select another K' 2 X and recalculate
-
R. Repeat until X = X'.
Downloaded by [New York University] at 06:31 06 February 2015
and
UDi = [Bpi(l - This case is similar to Case 3, except that we assume
191 that the mean aggregate demand, -d, is forecast and
b = - p~)]llz.
[Di(1 UD, is based on Equation 5.
Row four shows the sum of the two variances. Row from the observations and used as the estimator for b.
five presents the standard deviation which is the square We can use the above approach for each individual blood
root of the variance. The safety stock is shown in row six. group or for the total.
The safety stock is based on P=0.05 which equals a An alternate method is proposed in (21, where the de-
probability of shortage for individual blood groups, mand means and standard deviations for twenty three
P(z? of .0064. The latter is derived from Equation 2 and products were plotted and a linear relationship was
provides a z-value of 2.49. The remainder of Table 2 is found to exist between the demand means and the de-
self-explanatory. mand standard deviations. Although we have only eight
The example worked out above applies directly to blood groups, a plot of the means and standard deviations
Cases 3 or 5. The solution procedure will be considerably of these blood groups should provide us with a reasonable
easier for Cases 1 and 2. Cases 4 and 6 will be similar to basis for a relationship as hypothesized in Equation 16.
Cases 3 and 5.
ALTERNATIVE DISTRIBUTIONS
VERIFICATION OF DEMAND VARIATION FORMULA As a final note, it must be pointed out that the assump-
To verify a relationship such as Equation 16, it is tion of normality for Di and Ri, in case of blood groups
necessary to collect data over a fairly lengthy period of A- and AB-, may not be reasonable. Alternate distribu-
time. Observations could be collected on an actual tions that should be investigated for these two blood
weekly demand for each of the blood groups or for the groups are the Poisson and the negative binomial.
aggregate demand and the standard deviation of the Adoption of either one of these two distributions will not
mean could be calculated every four weeks for groups of change the basic models presented in this article, although
four observations. Over a period of one year there should it will present some problems. The Poisson is a desirable
be sufficient data collected to obtain an estimate of the distribution to use, especially for low-volume blood
relationship in Equation 16, provided the demand be- groups. It has the form
havior is reasonably stable.
To estimate the exponent b of the right-hand term of
Equation 16 we proceed by calculating the mean and where the parameter m is the mean as well as the variance.
standard deviation over a four-week period. We then use If the mean is not equal to the variance, we can translate
the formula the original mean and the variable to the correct units by
use of the factor y = m/u,2. All observations are multiplied
by the factor g and the new parameter m' becomes
to find observations on 6. An average 6 is then calculated m' = gm.