Although I have never directly received feedback for my introduction, I have noticed some problems with my introductions that could be revised. A common thing I’ve noticed while reviewing my work is how my introductions may contradict information later in my papers. This occurs because I do my introductions before the body paragraphs meaning that it might slightly go off-topic. One way I can fix this is by doing my introduction after my body paragraphs or rewriting them after the body paragraphs. 2. Methods Section The feedback I received on my method section primarily consisted of formatting and grammar problems. So many problems, or some things are frequent throughout my work, and I have been working to try and reduce whether they are a product of poor revision or miss checking my paper it would be beneficial for me to reduce the number of them. Before submitting my final draft, I intend to go back and scan my paper several times for formatting issues or grammatical problems. 3. Results Section For my results section, I received several points of feedback, including formatting, grammar, and citations. I put the coding results too close to an example. I was citing, confusing readers on which topic was being cited. I also didn’t have a lot of information when creating my research results, so I was told that it would be beneficial to get more information. I have already begun the process of getting more information by analyzing comments from the posts, studying, and searching for more codes to categorize the videos. By doing this, and fixing the grammatical and formatting issues my research section should be close to finished. 4. Discussion Section From the feedback I received on my discussion section introduction, I was told I could benefit from more detail that helped me reach my conclusion. I also should try not to end my paragraphs with sentence citations, but instead elaborate on the quotes after them to give more information to the audience. In my discussion section, I also mentioned lots of quantitative data, but never really related it back to my research question. Besides my second paragraph being a mess, the rest of my work was clear according to the feedback. Moving forward I could benefit strongly from rewriting my second paragraph or focusing on making my quantitative data impact what I was trying to say about my research question. Besides my second paragraph being a mess, the rest of my work was clear according to my feedback.
(Palgrave Studies in Minority Languages and Communities) Durk Gorter, Heiko F. Marten, Luk Van Mensel (Eds.) - Minority Languages in The Linguistic Landscape-Palgrave Macmillan UK (2012) PDF