Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Media and Digital Management 1St Edition 2018 Edition Noam Full Chapter
Media and Digital Management 1St Edition 2018 Edition Noam Full Chapter
ELI M. NOAM
Media and Digital Management
Eli M. Noam
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2019, corrected publication 2019
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether
the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of
illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and
transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by simi-
lar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publica-
tion does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the
relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this
book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the
authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein
or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to
jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
V
Contents
I Overview
1 Introduction...................................................................................................................................... 3
1.1 The Need for “Media Management”?........................................................................................... 4
1.2 Approaches to the Study and Teaching of Media Management....................................... 4
1.3 Outline of the Book............................................................................................................................. 5
1.4 Outlook.................................................................................................................................................... 5
II Production
3 Production Management in Media and Information............................................. 19
3.1 Media Production................................................................................................................................ 21
3.1.1 Introduction........................................................................................................................................... 21
3.1.2 Content Production............................................................................................................................. 21
3.1.3 Special Characteristics in Content Production............................................................................ 21
3.2 Content Industries.............................................................................................................................. 22
3.2.1 Early Content.......................................................................................................................................... 22
3.2.2 Types of Production............................................................................................................................. 22
3.2.3 Cost Characteristics: Film Versus Theater...................................................................................... 22
3.2.4 History of the Film Production Industry........................................................................................ 23
3.2.5 Production in Other Media Industries............................................................................................ 24
3.2.6 The Global Success of the Hollywood Production Industry.................................................... 26
3.2.7 Case Discussion..................................................................................................................................... 27
3.3 Conventional Arguments for Hollywood’s Success in Production................................... 28
3.3.1 Supposed Advantage: Market Size? Language?......................................................................... 28
VI Contents
4.5 Outlook.................................................................................................................................................... 90
4.6 Review Materials.................................................................................................................................. 90
4.6.1 Questions for Discussion.................................................................................................................... 91
4.6.2 Quiz........................................................................................................................................................... 92
Quiz Answers.......................................................................................................................................... 95
III Marketing
9 Demand and Market Research for Media and Information Products.......... 233
9.1 Why Demand Analysis....................................................................................................................... 234
9.1.1 The Importance and Special Problems of Demand Estimation for Media Industries..... 234
9.1.2 Examples for the Problems in Forecasting Media Demand.................................................... 235
9.1.3 Limits to Audience and Market Research...................................................................................... 236
9.1.4 How Media Companies Organize Their Market Research........................................................ 237
9.1.5 Case Discussion..................................................................................................................................... 238
9.2 Data Collection..................................................................................................................................... 238
9.2.1 The Impact of Collection Methodology........................................................................................ 238
9.2.2 Collecting Data from Users................................................................................................................ 239
9.2.3 Measurement at the Provider (Sell-Side) Level........................................................................... 243
9.3 Analyzing the Data............................................................................................................................. 247
9.3.1 Transforming Data into Information—Audience Metrics........................................................ 247
9.3.2 Transforming Information into Knowledge: Qualitative Analysis......................................... 249
9.3.3 Quantitative Analysis: “Data Mining” —Overviews of Techniques........................................ 250
9.4 Conclusions and Outlook................................................................................................................. 259
9.4.1 Case Discussion..................................................................................................................................... 259
9.4.2 Challenges in Audience and Market Research............................................................................ 260
9.4.3 Conclusion.............................................................................................................................................. 262
9.5 Review Materials.................................................................................................................................. 262
9.5.1 Questions for Discussion.................................................................................................................... 263
9.5.2 Quiz........................................................................................................................................................... 263
Quiz Answers.......................................................................................................................................... 266
IV Feedback Loop
13 Accounting in Media and Information Firms............................................................ 387
13.1 Accounting and Media Accounting........................................................................................... 389
13.1.1 The Function of Accounting in Business.................................................................................... 389
13.1.2 Is Accounting for Media and Technology Special?.................................................................. 391
13.1.3 Case Discussion.................................................................................................................................. 392
13.1.4 The Five Sets of Books...................................................................................................................... 392
13.2 Profit Accounting.............................................................................................................................. 393
13.2.1 How to Depress Accounting Profits............................................................................................. 393
13.2.2 Royalties for Books and Music....................................................................................................... 393
13.2.3 Profit Accounting in Limited Partnerships................................................................................. 394
13.2.4 How Profit Participants Can Protect Themselves..................................................................... 395
13.3 Public Financial Accounting......................................................................................................... 396
13.3.1 Major Financial Documents for Investors.................................................................................. 396
13.3.2 Auditing................................................................................................................................................ 397
13.3.3 Regulation of Accounting............................................................................................................... 397
13.4 Analyzing Financial Statements and Valuation of Media Firms..................................... 398
13.4.1 Ratios and Metrics............................................................................................................................. 398
13.5 The Valuation of Media Properties............................................................................................ 403
13.5.1 Cost Approaches................................................................................................................................ 403
13.5.2 Income Approaches.......................................................................................................................... 403
13.5.3 Multiples Approach........................................................................................................................... 404
13.6 The Balance Sheet............................................................................................................................ 405
13.6.1 Assets..................................................................................................................................................... 406
13.6.2 Depreciation and Amortization of Assets.................................................................................. 406
13.7 Liabilities............................................................................................................................................. 408
13.7.1 Stock Options...................................................................................................................................... 408
13.7.2 Case Discussion.................................................................................................................................. 409
13.8 Income and Profit Statements..................................................................................................... 409
13.8.1 EBITDA and Other Profit Definitions............................................................................................ 410
13.8.2 Case Discussion.................................................................................................................................. 410
13.8.3 The Cash Flow Statement................................................................................................................ 411
13.8.4 Cost and Expenses............................................................................................................................. 411
XIV Contents
Supplementary Information
Index...................................................................................................................................................... 469
The copyright year of this book has been revised: The correction is available at
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72000-5_16
List of Figures
Overview
Contents
Chapter 1 Introduction – 3
Introduction
1.1 The Need for “Media Management”? – 4
1.4 Outlook – 5
1 Books: Greco, Albert N., Jim Milliot, and Robert Wharton. The Book Pub- Station Management: The Business of Broadcasting. New York: Hastings
lishing Industry. New York: Routledge, 2013; Compaine, Benjamin M. The House, 1964; Owen, Bruce M., Jack H. Beebe, and Willard G. Manning.
Book Industry in Transition: An Economic Study of Book Distribution and Television Economics. Lexington, MA: Heath, 1974.
Marketing. White Plains, NY: Knowledge Industry Publications, 1978. Telecom: Sherman, Barry L. Telecommunications Management, 3rd
Music: Krasilovsky, M. William et al. This Business of Music, 10th ed. ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1997; Gershon, Richard A. Telecommunica-
New York: Billboard Books, 2007. Theater: Langley, Stephen. Theatre Man- tions Management. New York: Routledge, 2001.
agement in America. New York: Drama Book Publishers, 2006. Advertising: Jugenheimer, Donald W. and Larry D. Kelley. Advertising
Magazines: Wharton, John. Managing Magazine Publishing. London: Management. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 2009.
Blueprint, 1992; Daly, Charles P., Patrick Henry, and Ellen Ryder. The Websites: Elliott, Geoff. Website Management. Colchester, UK: Lexden
Magazine Publishing Industry. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon, Publishing Limited, 2007; Layon, Kristofer. Digital Product Management.
1996; Heinrich, Jürgen. Medienökonomie: Band 1: Mediensystem, Zeitung, Indianapolis, IN: New Riders, 2014; Strauss, Roy and Patrick Hogan.
Zeitschrift, Anzeigenblatt. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1994. Developing Effective Websites: A Project Manager’s Guide. Boston: Focal
Newspapers: Herrick, Dennis F. Media Management in the Age of Press, 2013.
Giants: Business Dynamics of Journalism, 2nd ed. Albuquerque: UNM Video Games: Hotho, Sabine and Neil McGregor. Changing the Rules
Press, 2012; Giles, Robert H. Newsroom Management: A Guide to Theory of the Game: Economic, Management and Emerging Issues in the Computer
and Practice. Indianapolis, IN: R.J. Berg, 1987; Rankin, W. Parkman. The Games Industry. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2013. Wagner, Marcus,
Practice of Newspaper Management. New York: Praeger, 1986; Mogel, Jaume Valls-Pasola, and Thierry Burger-Helmchen. The Global Manage-
Leonard. The Newspaper: Everything You Need to Know to Make it in the ment of Creativity. New York: Routledge, 2017.
Newspaper Business. Pittsburgh, PA: GATF Press, 2000; Picard, Robert G. 2 Vogel, Harold. Entertainment Industry Economics: A Guide for Financial
and Jeffrey H. Brody. The Newspaper Publishing Industry. Boston: Allyn & Analysis, 10th ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014; Van
Bacon, 1997; Willis, William J. Surviving in the Newspaper Business: News- Tassel, Joan and Lisa Poe-Howfield. Managing Electronic Media: Making,
paper Management in Turbulent Times. New York: Praeger, 1988. Marketing, and Moving Digital Content. Burlington, MA: Focal Press, 2010;
Film: De Vany, Arthur. Hollywood Economics. New York: Routledge, Albarran, Alan B. Management of Electronic and Digital Media. Boston:
2004; Clevé, Bastian. Film Production Management, Waltham, MA: Focal Wadsworth, 2013; Chaturvedi, B.K. Media Management. New Delhi:
Press, 2000; Epstein, Edward J. The Hollywood Economist 2.0: The Hidden Global Vision Publishing House, 2009; Turow, Joseph. Media Today:
Financial Reality Behind the Movies. New York: Melville House, 2012. Mass Communication in a Converging World. New York, Routledge, 2013;
Radio: Reinsch, J. Leonard and Elmo Israel Lewis. Radio Station Man- Lavine, John M. and Daniel B. Wackman. Managing Media Organiza-
agement, 2nd ed. New York: Harper, 1960. tions. New York: Longman, 1988; Pringle, Peter K. and Michael F. Starr.
TV and Cable: Marcus, Norman. Broadcast and Cable Management. Electronic Media Management, 5th ed. Boston: Focal Press, 2006; López,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1986; Quall, Ward L. and Leo A. Mar- Juan Torres. Economía de la Comunicación. Madrid: Gruopo Zero, 1985;
tin. Broadcast Management: Radio + Television. New York: Hastings House, Hollifield, C. Ann, Jan LeBlanc Wicks, George Sylvie, and Wilson Lowery.
1969; Blumenthal, Howard J. and Oliver R. Goodenough. This Business of Media Management: A Casebook Approach, 5th ed. New York: Routledge,
Television, 3rd ed. New York: Billboard Books, 2006; Roe, Yale. Television 2015.
1.4 · Outlook
5 1
financing or human resources across industries.3 it is also an endlessly interesting, fascinating field
Such approach follows the disciplinary specialties that generates great enthusiasm. Creativity meets
of their authors and are thus rarely interdisciplin- management. Imagination meets technology. Arts
ary or holistic across business functions. meet investment. Left brain meets right brain.
Youth meets wealth. Media create the entertain-
ment that forms our fantasies, shapes our styles
1.3 Outline of the Book and sets our role models. It provides our analysis
of the world around us. It is the trendsetter that
It is the goal of this book to overcome the limita- affects our tastes. It represents sweet imagination,
tions of this matrix and apply the major dimensions seductive opportunity, rich possibilities, style,
of a business curriculum—from finance to produc- opportunity, fortune and fame.
tion to marketing to accounting, and more—to the The good news is that for those interested in
entire media and information sector. In the process, the information resource—how to produce it,
communications students benefit from a business- how to distribute it, how to use it—the present is
oriented summary, while more generally oriented the most exciting period, ever. The bad news is
business students are introduced to the media and that it is also a period with the greatest uncer-
information sector. Both approaches afford a look tainty and risk ever. What does it take for success
at the main players and their challengers. in the media business? Creativity, innovation and
The book could be subtitled: Management performance, of course. But that is not enough. It
Study in a Nutshell. It takes most major compo- requires an understanding of technology, money,
nents of a business program, simplifies them, markets, audiences, pricing, global business, eco-
summarizes them, and applies them to the media nomics, managerial accounting, government rela-
and information sector. It covers these tools and tions, and the ability to nurture and lead talent.
approaches in a non-technical way. There are few Our aim in this book is to help those in the media,
equations. There are no prerequisites, though an information and media technology sector to
introductory course in economics would proba- become creative managers and managerial cre-
bly help in terms of mindset. atives. The purpose of this book is to make young
managers in this field more knowledgeable and
less blinded by hype. It aims to make the reader a
1.4 Outlook more effective, more productive and more respon-
sible participant.
This leaves the question: Why be a manager in
the media and information sector? It is a diffi- Acknowledgments The material was tested out at
cult business with an uncertain career path. Yet, several universities, including the Annenberg
School of Communication at the University of
Pennsylvania, but in particular at Columbia
3 Marketing and Distribution: Eastman, Susan Tyler, Douglas Ferguson, and
University. At the Columbia Business School, many
Robert Klein. Eds. Media Promotion & Marketing for Broadcasting, Cable & people contributed their talent and energy. I thank
the Internet. Burlington, MA: Focal Press, 2006; Marich, Robert. Marketing
to Moviegoers. Burlington, MA: Focal Press, 2013; Ulin, Jeffrey C. The Busi-
the School and Dean Glenn Hubbard for summer
ness of Media Distribution: Monetizing Film, TV, and Video Content in an support, and the Columbia Institute of Tele-
Online World. Burlington, MA: Focal Press, 2013.
Strategy: Küng, Lucy. Strategic Management in the Media: Theory and
Information (CITI) for providing the environment
Practice, 2nd ed. Los Angeles: Sage, 2016; Aris, Annet and Jacques Bug- and research structure. Two people, in particular,
hin. Managing Media Companies: Harnessing Creative Value. Chichester:
Wiley, 2012; Chan-Olmsted, Sylvia M. “Issues in Strategic Management.”
deserve special thanks. Jason Buckweitz, Executive
In Handbook of Media Management and Economics. Eds. Alan B. Albar- Director of CITI, held this project together with an
ran, Sylvia M. Chan-Olmsted, and Michael O. Wirth. New York: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates, 2006.
amazing combination of skills in research, manage-
Economics: Shy, Oz. Economics of Network Industries. Cambridge, UK: ment, technology and law. Many thanks also go to
Cambridge University Press, 2001; Picard, Robert G. Media Economics:
Concepts and Issues. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1989; Owen, Bruce M. and
Corey Spencer, Assistant Director of CITI, for
Steven S. Wildman. Video Economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University superb administration and assistance on numerous
Press, 1992; Toussaint-Desmoulins, Nadine. L’economie de Medias. Paris:
Press Universitaires de France, 1978; Doyle, Gillian, Understanding Media
levels with a variety of tasks. I am grateful to both
Economics, London: Sage, 2013; Picard, Robert G. The Economics and colleagues for their dedicated and outstanding con-
Financing of Media Companies. New York: Fordham University Press,
2011; Alexander, Alison et al. Eds. Media Economics: Theory and Practice,
tribution to this large project. They were assisted by
3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004. teams of able young summer college interns and
6 Chapter 1 · Introduction
research associates. Several young professionals (Production, and more); and my professor of
1 contributed during their stays at Columbia: John many years ago, Richard Caves.
Lazcano, Aleksandra Kotlyar, Ana Bizberge, Boris Several outside experts have been helpful in
Nicholson, Inho Lee and John Heywood. reviewing parts of the manuscript and deserve
The book, covering so much ground, draws great thanks. In addition to several anonymous ref-
from numerous sources and authors, and I am erees, they are Harold Vogel (himself a noted author
indebted to them. Over 1600 citations for sources in this field), Scott MacDonald and Devin Brook.
have been used or referenced, but should we have At Palgrave Macmillan, I thank my editor,
inadvertently omitted giving adequate credit to a Shaun Vigil, Editor of Film, Cultural and Media
source or author, my apologies. Several authors Studies, for supporting this major project with
have been particularly important and deserve trust, patience and good judgment. We also thank
special mention. They are Haig Nalbantian (for Glenn Ramirez and Tikoji Rao for their dedicated
the chapter on Human Resource Management); contribution to the editorial process.
Alexander Poltorak (Intellectual Assets); Matthew The greatest thanks of all go to my beloved wife
Stewart (Strategy); Thomas Nagle and his co- Nadine Strossen, champion of free speech and
authors (Pricing); Edward Jay Epstein open media. She inspires me every day.
7 2
The Information
Environment
2.1 D
rivers of Change – 8
2.1.1 The Setting – 8
2.1.2 Technology – 8
2.1.3 People – 8
2.3 R
eview Materials – 12
2.3.1 uestions for Discussion – 13
Q
2.3.2 Quiz – 13
Q
uiz Answers – 16
2.1.3 People
with one’s peers. To most individuals, the value of of information creates a poverty of attention”.7 New
a film, TV show, music recording, or popular media consumption must be mostly supported by
book rises as the experience is shared with many substitution from existing media in terms of time
2 other people. or full attention. Inevitably, this leads to competi-
Network effects have several business implica- tion for “mindshare” and “attention.” Compared
tions. As in the economies of scale—which with 1998, fewer than half of the new products
describe advantages to size on the production make it to the bestsellers lists, reach the top of
side—size is important also on the consumption audience rankings, or win a platinum disc.
side. For certain goods and services, the larger the The business consequence is more competi-
firm’s user base, the more value is provided to tion and greater specialization in media content
users. A song that gets attention on a large social and technology. In addition, a greater product
network gains a cumulative advantage because innovation and marketing effort is necessary.
many more want to be included in the experi- Together, costs rise per product.
ence.4 A firm that captures a relatively large share
of an audience will often experience further
demand growth, and can charge users a higher 2.2.4 haracteristic #4 of Media
C
price. and Information: Price
Deflation
2.2.3 haracteristic #3 of Media
C A major economic property of media has been
and Information: Excess price deflation. In general, when price competi-
Supply tion occurs, in any industry, the price of a good or
service is driven toward its marginal cost.8
We observed that media production has been Marginal cost for many information products and
increasing exponentially. Media consumption, services is near-zero. But that low price, the reve-
however, increases only linearly and slowly. Excess nues do not cover total cost, which also includes
supply is inevitable; it is accelerated by the increased the high fixed cost. The result of price competition
ease of spreading globally through ever-cheaper with low marginal cost has been price deflation in
electronic distribution and the proliferation of information products and services. This is a good
start-
up content providers. The compounded deal for the consumer but a difficult problem for
annual growth rate of media production is about the creators, producers and distributors.9 Price
12.0%, whereas the compounded annual growth deflation toward marginal cost poses a threat to
rate of media time consumption is only 1.2%. Even their long-term viability, since low prices make it
that rate will decline. As mentioned, the average difficult to cover costs and achieve profitability.
American citizen already consumes 2100 hours of And that is, indeed, what has been happening.
media per year—5.75 hours per day.5 Given time Information has become cheaper for many a
for sleep, eating and work, that number will decade. And it is becoming increasingly difficult to
increase only slowly. Thus, the demand gap is charge anything for it. Music and online content is
growing at over 10% each year. increasingly free. Newspaper prices barely cover
This has consequences for both content style the cost of paper and delivery; the content is
and marketing.6 Attention is the scarce resource. thrown in for free. As social media pioneer Stewart
As observed by Herbert A. Simon, the 1978 winner Brand said, “Information wants to be free.” Free in
of the Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences, “a wealth terms of content, but also free in terms of price.
2.3.2 Quiz
2.3.1 Questions for Discussion ?? 1. To be profitable in the information busi-
ness usually requires imperfect markets.
?? 1. How should we define the information
A. False.
sector?
B. True.
?? 7. How does the information revolution ?? 5. Perhaps the last major constraint on
affect the process of globalization? media consumption is:
A. High price of media goods.
?? 8. How has the relationship between B. Ubiquity of media goods.
producers and consumers of media C. Bad programming.
changed in the past decade? D. Limited time for consumption.
14 Chapter 2 · The Information Environment
?? 6. Which is not a fundamental characteristic ?? 12. What are the segments of the media
of knowledge today? industry?
A. Proliferation. A. Media devices.
2 B. Innovation. B. Distribution platforms.
C. Specialization. C. Content production.
D. Scarcity. D. All of the above.
?? 7. Which is not an obstacle to the transition ?? 13. What makes the Information economy
toward new media? Schumpetarian?
A. Anti-P2P legislation. A. Rapid technological change and cre-
B. Network effects. ative destruction.
C. Garnering the type of advertising reve- B. Increasing returns to scale.
nue that the current mass media attracts. C. Decentralized economic actors.
D. All of them can be obstacles. D. Ease of communication and sym-
metrical information exchange.
?? 8. The shape of the new media establish-
ment seems to be, as such:
?? 14. What causes market failures in the infor-
A. A sphere, with equidistant unlimited
mation sector?
nodes, all with equal power—it signi-
A. High fixed costs and low marginal
fies total decentralization.
costs in a competitive environment
B. A cube, with segments of equal
causes firms to price at a loss.
reach—the symmetry signifies the
B. Asymmetric information leads to
balance between media producer and
adverse selection, so that only the
media consumer.
consumers with the least to pay will
C. A pyramid, with a few mass producers
read newspapers.
at the top and numerous media ven-
C. Government intervention has dis-
ues supporting it at the bottom.
rupted the market mechanism
D. A simple arrow—projected toward an
and is creating significant dead
unknown and unpredictable future.
weight loss.
D. Positive externalities are not recog-
?? 9. All these characteristics make media
nized by consumers of information
management different except for:
products.
A. Difficulty in predicting consumer
preferences.
B. High fixed costs and low marginal costs. ?? 15. Which of the following is not a character-
C. Price deflation and public good char- istic of an intellectual asset?
acteristics of products. A. Does not deplete with use.
D. Mostly scientific management methods. B. Easy to price differentially.
C. Not inherently a scarce resource.
?? 10. Network effects lead to: D. Can be shared.
A. An elastic demand curve.
B. Decentralization. ?? 16. Which of the following is not a conse-
C. Barriers to entry. quence of high fixed cost/low marginal
D. Falling prices. cost characteristics for a media firm?
A. Large “consumer surplus.”
?? 11. What makes the media industry so risky? B. Incentives to piracy.
A. Of products, 10% make most of the C. No incentive to price discriminate
profit. among customers.
B. Price deflation. D. Competitive prices are often unprofit-
C. Market instability. able.
D. All of the above. E. First-mover advantage.
2.3 · Review Materials
15 2
?? 17. Why do governments often take a role in C. Cost-based pricing.
supporting the creation of information? D. Marginal-cost pricing.
A. Solely to have a stronger influence on
the information. ?? 20. Managerial implications of price deflation
B. Information, as a public good, implies in the overall information sector include
under-investments by private parties. which of the following:
C. Information wants to be free. 1. Strong process and product innova-
D. Information, as a public good, implies tion.
over-investments by private parties. 2. Outsourcing of production.
3. Short term sales contracts.
?? 18. Information assets often have a shorter A. 1 and 2.
economic life than tangible ones. Why? B. 1, 2 and 3.
A. High employee turnovers. C. 1 and 3.
B. As a society, we are getting smarter. D. 2 and 3.
C. Exponential growth of information
shortens usefulness period. ?? 21. As the media sector is highly regulated
D. Can be shared easily. by the government, what are the implica-
tions for media managers?
?? 19. What should be a main strategy for media A. Manage government relations as a
managers in terms of pricing? business function.
A. Typically, keep price competition in B. Industry is more volatile.
favor of competition on features and C. Changing of pricing in mass media
quality. requires governmental approval.
B. Typically, avoid price competition in D. Greater flexibility in decision making.
favor of competition on features and
quality.
16 Chapter 2 · The Information Environment
vv 1. A vv 12. D
2
vv 2. C vv 13. A
vv 3. D vv 14. A
vv 4. B vv 15. B
vv 5. D vv 16. C
vv 6. D vv 17. B
vv 7. D vv 18. C
vv 8. C vv 19. B
vv 9. D vv 20. A
vv 10. C vv 21. A
17 II
Production
Contents
Production Management
in Media and Information
3.1 M
edia Production – 21
3.1.1 Introduction – 21
3.1.2 Content Production – 21
3.1.3 Special Characteristics in Content Production – 21
3.2 C
ontent Industries – 22
3.2.1 E arly Content – 22
3.2.2 Types of Production – 22
3.2.3 Cost Characteristics: Film Versus Theater – 22
3.2.4 History of the Film Production Industry – 23
3.2.5 P
roduction in Other Media Industries – 24
3.2.6 The Global Success of the Hollywood Production
Industry – 26
3.2.7 C
ase Discussion – 27
3.3 C
onventional Arguments for Hollywood’s Success
in Production – 28
3.3.1 S upposed Advantage: Market Size? Language? – 28
3.3.2 2nd Supposed Advantage: Vertical Integration
of Content with Distribution? – 29
3.4 O
rganizational Success Factors for Content
Production – 30
3.4.1 rganizational Structure – 30
O
3.4.2 Funding and the Reduction of Risk – 32
3.5 P
roduct Development – 34
3.5.1 oncept (Style) – 34
C
3.5.2 Product Selection – 35
3.5.3 Product Development – 37
3.6 P
roduction Planning – 38
3.6.1 perational Challenges for Content Production – 38
O
3.6.2 Budgeting – 38
3.7 P
roduction Control – 46
3.7.1 udget Control – 46
B
3.7.2 Productivity Measurement – 46
3.8 R
evenue Shares of Producers in Media – 48
Quiz Answers – 58
3.1 · Media Production
21 3
3.1 Media Production 3.1.3 Special Characteristics
in Content Production
3.1.1 Introduction
The basic stages of content production are similar
The media sector has three legs: content, distribu- to those of production more generally. Typically,
tion and devices. In this chapter, we will address production requires the following steps:
content, its production and, specifically, the fol- 55 Market analysis;
lowing questions: 55 Concept creation;
55 What are the ingredients of successful con- 55 Selection;
tent production? 55 Funding;
55 How is content production being organized 55 Product design;
on an industrial scale? 55 Development;
55 What management tools can be applied to 55 Production planning;
media production? 55 Procurement and deployment of inputs;
55 Production and assembly;
When it comes to media content—movies, TV 55 Post-production improvements and quality
shows, music, books, newspapers—it seems that control;
everybody is an expert. It has surrounded us 55 Preparation for distribution.
since birth individually and infused our culture
collectively. Media content is not merely art and Each of these steps also exists for content pro-
entertainment. It is also a worldwide role model, duction. However, there are indeed differences,
a trendsetter and moodsetter. Media content as we discussed in 7 Chap. 2 The Information
exerts influence on our values, our attitudes, Environment. These include:
our politics and our lifestyles. It is the subject of 55 An unusually high level of uncertainty about
intense public fascination and scrutiny. It is also the commercial success of content products.
an industry and, for the USA, among the largest 55 Extremely high fixed production costs and
export businesses. low reproduction costs. They require signifi-
Creativity is thought of as an individual activ- cant upfront capital to make the initial prod-
ity, but it has become an organized business and uct. This means unusually high economies of
social activity. Film, theater, opera and software scale, which are further increased by network
development are all the result of highly organized effects: the users of a product partially increase
collaboration and teamwork. Creative content is the value of that product to other users.
being created on an industrial scale—the “Dream 55 There often exist content producers who do
Factory.” It is a complex process. not aim to maximize profit, which affects the
nature of competition.
55 Media content often has public good charac-
3.1.2 Content Production teristics: its value goes beyond the immedi-
ate benefits to the producers, and it is often
Production management aims at a smooth and impractical to exclude non-payers from
continuous flow of production. It must allo- enjoying the content.
cate resources to different activities. It aims to
increase productivity. And it must have a system We will discuss, in particular, the film industry,
in place to measure and evaluate performance. as it has always been the most commercialized of
Production activities in companies are often content media, with dynamics that has often fore-
headed by the Chief Operations Officer (COO). told those of other media. In order to understand
The responsibilities of production management the success factors for content production, we will
include: purchasing, inventories, and supply explore why one particular content production
chain; process engineering; production schedul- center—Hollywood—has been so successful, for
ing and capacity planning; subcontracting; and so long, in so many countries and, potentially,
locational choices. A sub-set is project manage- now the Internet. This is despite the fact that
ment, which tends to be more limited in scope Hollywood is a high-cost producer and that it has
and time. usually lacked a long-term strategic vision (e.g. it
22 Chapter 3 · Production Management in Media and Information
initially totally missed the significance of broad- shows. But the economics were unfavorable—they
cast TV, cable TV, home video and the Internet). were relatively expensive events to produce, and
Also, Hollywood’s success is despite the fact that the limited potential for automation and mass
many major international markets have only been production meant it was difficult to expand per-
partly open, with many of them imposing import formances to larger audiences. The “craft”-style
quotas for almost a century.1 content production was ready to be replaced by a
3 Yet, none of this seems to have made a dif- mass production model in the same way that print
ference. Hollywood productions have remained technology had industrialized the book medium
predominant around the world throughout after the sixteenth century. For music, this technol-
that time, despite countless efforts to support ogy emerged after 1877 with the Edison phono-
national production and to restrict Hollywood. graph; for moving visual imagery, film technology
In 1920, the Hollywood studios accounted for made a big splash after 1895.
over 70% of the world’s movie revenues. In 2016,
they still maintain about the same market share,
67.7.2 During this time, pretty much the same 3.2.2 Types of Production
six firms (Universal, Paramount, Disney, Warner
Bros., Columbia, 20th Century Fox) dominated Production is generally done in one of two basic
and produced the majority of films. (MGM and ways: as a “job shop” or as a “flow shop.” A job
RKO dropped out; Disney joined.) Not even shop means a specialized craft production. This
Houston’s oil companies, New York’s Wall Street approach creates special and highly varied prod-
and London’s City financial clusters, or Detroit’s ucts and uses general tools. In the media field,
automotive industry maintained such long-term examples for job shop productions are plays,
global dominance. What does this tell us about music events and books. Job shop productions
the elements for success in content production? typically require a relatively limited upfront capi-
tal investment to cover the relatively small upfront
overheads, but they have relatively high variable
3.2 Content Industries costs of production for the individual item.
In contrast, a “flow shop” is a process of mass
3.2.1 Early Content production that requires specialized resources.
Flow jobs tend to be industrial productions, i.e.
The production of what we now call “media content” on a larger scale and repetitive. They are charac-
goes back to the early days of humanity, when indi- terized by high fixed costs but low marginal costs.
viduals and groups performed for their community They are less flexible than a job shop production
or overlords. Over time, this became organized and and require larger capital investment. Examples of
institutionalized—theater in ancient Greece, gladi- flow shop productions are newspapers and maga-
atorial spectacles in Imperial Rome, playhouses in zines in content creation, and telecommunica-
Elizabethan London, opera stages in Italy. Some tions services in distribution.
performers were individual content providers, such In media and technology, there are typically
as bards, troubadours and minstrels. They provided two stages of production. The first is the produc-
entertainment and news. Others were teams orga- tion of the “first copy”, which has job shop/craft
nized as content companies that produced and per- characteristics; the second is the making of repro-
formed spectacles, plays and music events. ductions and their distribution, which have flow
In nineteenth-century America and Europe, shop/industrial characteristics.
popular entertainment was provided by theater,
opera, circus and various kinds of burlesque
3.2.3 ost Characteristics: Film
C
Versus Theater
1 For example, import quotas and restrictions were set in Germany and
France in 1921.
2 Tartaglione, Nancy. “2016 Intl Box Office Sees Projected 3.7% Drop Amid The basic economic advantage of film over the-
Currency Shifts & China Dips—Studio Chart.” Deadline Hollywood. Last
updated January 5, 2017. 7 http://deadline.com/2017/01/highest-
ater is that its distribution cost per viewer is only
grossing-movie-studios-of-2016-international-box-office-1201878861/. 1% or less of the cost to distribute a similar item
3.2 · Content Industries
23 3
of content via live theater. This low cost facili- 3.2.4 History of the Film
tates distribution to audiences of many millions. Production Industry
However, to make millions of people want to see
a particular film rather than any of its rivals, one In the 1820s and 1830s, Nicéphore Niépce and
needs to create a highly attractive product. This Louis Daguerre, in France, and William Fox
requires a higher upfront production costs for Talbot, in England, invented the process of pho-
the film than is spent on a theatrical show.3 These tography, using glass plates. In the 1880s, George
costs can then be spread over the larger audience. Eastman of the USA created celluloid film that
Thus, content production costs for Hollywood could be rolled up, and he introduced cheap
films (the fixed costs) have risen, over time, to Kodak cameras. In 1891, Thomas Edison’s labora-
the remarkable figure of approximately $10,000/ tory invented the Kinetoscope, where the viewer
second—500 times higher than for a typical com- stared into a box to see moving images. However,
mercial theater production. Edison’s peep-show style display could only be
Thus, film shifts costs away from the variable viewed individually, or by small groups using a
costs of distribution to the fixed costs of con- bank of consoles. In contrast, the brothers Louis
tent production. The cheaper the distribution, and Auguste Lumière of Lyon, France, projected
the more elaborate the content production can their moving images onto a screen, facilitating
become, since it is spread across more users. It is mass audiences. Their first film clip was L’Arrivée
one of the economic characteristics of an industry d’un train à la Ciotat (1895). Its first showing was
with high fixed costs and low marginal costs that in Paris in 1895 and can be counted as the begin-
it has high economies of scale—large providers ning of the film medium as popular entertain-
have cost advantages over small ones (provided ment.
they produce reasonably efficiently). Almost immediately, new types of content
The same cost dynamics apply to a compari- began to emerge; film moved beyond novelty to
son of printed books with hand-written manu- a medium of considerable creativity. Already in
scripts. A printing press reduces incremental 1902, A Trip to the Moon, a science fiction film,
cost, but increases upfront investment in fixed was produced in France with new special effects.
costs. It is also the case for recorded music vs. Physical comedy emerged, and the antics of
live music, or for off-the-shelf packaged software comedians such as Charlie Chaplin were distrib-
vs. customized programs. It is the economics of uted worldwide. The first Western film, The Great
industrial mass production vs. those of artisan Train Robbery, was created, as was the first sexu-
production. ally suggestive film, The Gay Shoe Clerk. These
However, it is also a double-edged sword. and other productions could venture into content
Production with higher fixed costs and lower mar- that theater could not accomplish technically or
ginal costs is more profitable when the number of financially—special effects and genuine outdoor
tickets or copies sold is large. Conversely, it can scenes.
also lead to a much higher loss when the number The fundamental economics of the film
of tickets sold is low. It is the higher-risk strategy. medium led also to imitation, piracy and to
To deal with this downside, risk reduction there- attempts to monopolize markets. In 1908, in a
fore becomes a central management task in the bid to control the industry, the so-called “Edison
content production of mass-market media. Cartel” pooled the patents of the industry lead-
A second management consequence is that a ers Edison, Pathé, Vitagraph, Eastman Kodak,
high-fixed cost, low marginal cost industry with and Biograph, as well as the financial resources
its high economies of scale means a more con- of J.P. Morgan. The cartel possessed patents, the-
centrated industry structure, composed of a few aters, money, lawyers and connections. Yet, it was
large firms. These dimension of content produc- unable to suppress independent film entrepre-
tion will now be discussed, with the film industry, neurs. These emerged from the popular entertain-
which has pioneered many of the business models ment industry (such as vaudeville) that catered
of media, as the main example. to working-class audiences, or from retail and
merchandizing trades. These pioneers established
3 For theater, these upfront production costs include expenses up to the
the film companies that continue to exist into the
opening show, after which the costs are those of reproduction. twenty-first century.
24 Chapter 3 · Production Management in Media and Information
“made- for-
TV” films. These have increasingly 3.2.6 he Global Success of the
T
become part of subsequent distribution over the Hollywood Production
Internet. Industry
The world’s largest producers of TV content are
state-owned broadcast entities (such as in China, We now return to a discussion of the film indus-
Egypt and Russia), and national public service
3 broadcasters such as BBC (UK), RAI (Italy), NHK
try. For several centuries, the flow of culture—
books, theater and music—flowed largely in one
(Japan), and ARD and ZDF (Germany). Large direction: out of Europe to the colonies and the
commercial TV producers are Globo (Brazil); rest of the world. Then, however, the direction
Televisa (Mexico); NTV, TV Asahi, Fuji, TBS of the flow reversed for the youthful medium of
(Japan); SBS (Korea); Bertelsmann (Germany) film. Starting in 1910, American films accounted
and Fininvest (Berlusconi, Italy). In the USA, for over half of the box office in Europe, exceeding
the largest TV content producers in 2013 were domestic products even in France, Germany and
Disney (29.0%), Viacom/CBS (20.1%), Universal the UK, and this percentage grew in the 1920s. In
(Comcast, 16.3%), 21st Century Fox (Murdoch, response, protective import quotas and restric-
7.8%), Time Warner (10.7%) and Sony (4.5%). tions on the repatriation of box office earnings
Almost all these companies not only produce, but were speedily established in the major European
also operate broadcast and cable channels. Market countries. In effect, this was an early regulatory
shares vary from year to year based on the success measure against cultural globalization—which,
of particular shows. until then, had been acceptable in music and lit-
erature. Content protectionism serves three func-
3.2.5.5 Video Games
tions: to shelter a country’s national culture and
Video games, though distributed by game pub- identity, to support the influential cultural pro-
lishers, are actually written by different types of duction sector and its workforce, and to help proj-
developers: in-house teams of the publishers, ect a country’s visibility worldwide. The measures
independents who may self-publish and self- employed were direct governmental subsidies,
distribute, and third-party contractors. When import quotas, screen and broadcast quotas, and
self-developing, the distribution forms hire pro- tax breaks. Many of these policies have persisted in
grammers, game designers, artists, sound engi- one form or another for almost a century. Even so,
neers, producers and testers. of the top 40 grossing films worldwide in almost
Major games cost easily $10 million and more every year almost all were Hollywood produc-
to produce, plus $10 million to market. Game tions. In most countries, audiences prefer domes-
platforms are subject to a five-year hardware cycle tically produced films. Imported Hollywood films
of technology generations, and game companies follow behind as the second most popular and, as
must redesign most of their game software on they are more numerous, they thus dominate. The
the same schedule to conform to the enhanced key problem is that films from third countries—
technological capabilities of the new-generation including films from neighboring countries—are
platforms. much less popular outside their own country. In
The video game industry has moved to eco- 2004, only 8% of film revenue in Europe was from
nomics similar to those of Hollywood. This European films shown outside their own national
includes high budgets and a reliance on block- market in other European countries.16
busters.15 The industry introduced in-game What, then, are the reasons for Hollywood’s
advertisements similar to TV commercials. success as a content production center? The
answers may help to identify the main success fac-
tors for content production more generally.
France is the birthplace of film gifted writers and critics centered closest advisor, chief of staff,
and is also a significant market for around the journal Cahiers du Cin- regular golfing partner, campaign
the medium. In 2016, 209 million ema, including Francois Truffault, finance director and the executor
tickets were sold; 34.5% of admis- Jean-Luc Godard, Eric Rohmer and of his will. Rousselet became head
sions were for French films, while Jacques Rivette, and attacked this of the largest French advertis-
53.6% were for American films, tradition. Starting in the late 1950s, ing and media company, Havas,
an increasing number over 2011 they began to make their own which then received from the
when it was 48%;17 and 211 French movies. government a monopoly license to
films were released,18 which made The result was a major renais- transmit pay-TV in France, as Canal
France the largest film producer in sance in French filmmaking. Plus. Being the state-licensed
Europe. 120 first-time directors made monopolist of pay-TV, Canal
Canal Plus (or Canal+) is the full-length films in the years Plus was able to charge prices
major French film distribution and 1958–1964. Governmental or pub- that would have failed in more
production company, a subsidiary lic-service TV usually supported competitive markets. In 2014, it
of the multi-media firm Vivendi. It these films. This era is known as charged almost $53 per month.
has its own production arm (Stu- the French New Wave—Nouvelle In contrast, HBO or Showtime in
dioCanal) and distribution chan- Vague. Other French filmmakers the USA charge $11–$17. In return
nels in France, Europe and Africa. in those years included Claude for its profitable exclusivity20 in
Chabrol, Jean Renoir and Alain pay-TV, Canal Plus had to agree to
Cinema in France Resnais.19 Soon, however, the New allocate 10% of its revenues to the
To understand the present and Wave crested. Financial success production of French films. This
future of Canal Plus, one must was less frequent, and younger revenue source became the major
understand its past. For several audiences did not follow the funder of French cinema.
decades, French film had been a 1960s generation in enthusiasm.
relatively weak exporter. In other By the late 1970s, French film had Vivendi—The Parent Company
cultural markets, French cultural declined again. Vivendi is the largest European
products have been highly suc- To deal with this decline, media company. Its origin is the
cessful around the world. Paris is the French government created French municipal water utility
the capital of fashion and cuisine; a financial support mechanism. Compagnie Generale Des Eau,
its books are read worldwide. In Its most notable element was created by edict of Napoleon III in
popular French music, dance music through the creation of the new 1853. Eventually, water distribu-
group Daft Punk has become highly pay-TV channel Canal Plus in the tion led to waste management,
successful. Its album Random mid-1980s. Previously, under construction, energy, cable TV dis-
Access Memories, released in 2013, conservative French presidents tribution and mobile telecom. The
sold half a million copies and was de Gaulle and Pompidou, French media part was renamed “Vivendi.”
number one in the Billboard album TV was totally owned and con- Its president, Jean-Marie Messier,
chart. Another famous French trolled by the government, for was a highly entrepreneurial leader
musician is the rock star Johnny which it was the mouthpiece. who admired the American media
Hallyday, who has sold more than De Gaulle’s influence rested on CEO model. He made the company
100 million albums worldwide. his direct TV addresses to the a major vehicle of growth.
For decades, many of the nation. A new socialist president, Vivendi diversified by buy-
major French films were elaborate Francois Mitterand, himself long ing the second French cellular
productions of classic novels of a victim of such state TV, opened telecom operator, the videogame
French culture. This “cinema of the medium, and created the first companies Activision and Blizzard
quality” was supported by gov- pay-TV channel, Canal Plus. But, Games, and Canal Plus. It then
ernment funds. Critics covered it staying within the paradigm of acquired the major Hollywood
gently. Outside of France, it left state control, it was guided by studio and music companies
no mark. A dissident group of Andre Rousselet, the President’s Universal Pictures and Universal
Music in 2000. Eventually, how- Vivendi became a classic verti- Canal Plus has a stake in two-
ever, Vivendi over-extended itself cally integrated multi-national mass thirds of French film production
and faced huge debt obligations media and telecommunication and is the prime provider of original
and insolvency. The losses in 2001 company with activities in music, cable TV content in France. It is
stood at $11.2 billion. Messier was television, film, publishing, telecom- Europe’s largest film distributor (over
fired, and Vivendi sold off some munications, the Internet and video pay-TV) and film producer, and it
3 of its acquisitions, including most games.21 Its market share in the film wants to export worldwide, includ-
of Universal Pictures. Messier was market in France is 26.8%, far ahead ing to the USA. The question is, how
charged with securities violations of others, including Hollywood firms this might be done? How can Canal
and, a decade later, was slapped whose combined share was about Plus become a global content pro-
on the wrist to pay a fine of 50%. In 2016, Canal Plus accounted ducer? What kind of content should
€150,000. for 23% of Vivendi’s profits.22 Canal Plus produce, and how?
3.3 Conventional Arguments it is clearly by far the most influential and global
for Hollywood’s Success language, and is spoken by an economically afflu-
in Production ent slice of the world’s population.
But is market size, even when weighted by
3.3.1 Supposed Advantage: income, determinative of production success? If
Market Size? Language? it were, this would relegate small countries into
permanent roles as importers. However, such
Many explanations have been offered for “two-stage” thinking, in which exports are only
Hollywood’s enduring success as a center for con- a subsequent second step after domestic success,
tent production. The most frequent reasons given makes no sense for a business firm. With such
are the large scale of the market, as well as politi- economic logic, there would be no major industry
cal and economic power; superior access to talent; of making watches in Switzerland, chocolate in
and vertical integration of production and distri- Belgium, software in Israel and Ireland, or video
bution. These factors will now be discussed, as games or consumer electronics in Korea. All these
they are relevant to all types of content industries. countries are relatively small. None possesses
The conventional argument for content suc- unique natural resources. But they are major
cess is that a large domestic market must exist exporters of their products despite (or, perhaps,
before exporting the content worldwide. Thus, because of) their limited national markets. In the
the US population is about 318 million, whereas modern economy, producers must plan from the
the French population, for example, is only 66 beginning to sell in a world market, rather than
million. A 2013 compilation finds that English only domestically.
as a first and second language was understood That it can be profitable for media compa-
by 840 million people. For French, the number nies from small or medium-sized countries to
was 486 million; for Spanish, 430 million; for become large in global terms can be seen by the
Portuguese, 310 million; and for Arabic, 620 mil- world’s largest commercial book publishers. In
lion. It is highest for Mandarin at 1036 million 2009, these had been #1 Bertelsmann (Germany);
and Hindi/Urdu at 850 million.23 Thus, English #2 Lagardère/Hachette (France); #3 Fininvest/
by sheer numbers is not a radical outlier, though Mondadori (Italy); #4 Planeta (Spain); followed by
a US company (Harper Collins) as #5, controlled
by the long-time Australian Rupert Murdoch’s
News Corp. All of these companies made a sub-
21 Vivendi. “Vivendi in Brief.” Last accessed April 12, 2017. 7 http://www.
vivendi.com/en/vivendi-en/.
stantial part of their business outside their home
22 Vivendi. Vivendi 2016 Annual Report. Last accessed April 12, 2017. base.
7 http://www.vivendi.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/20170223_
Financial_Report_and_Consolidated_Financial_Statements_FY_2016.
But an exports orientation also has an impact
pdf. on content. If export revenues rise in importance,
23 Simons, Gary F. and Charles D. Fennig. Eds. Ethnologue: Languages of
the World, 20th ed. Dallas, TX: SIL International, 2017. Online version:
the incentives for content in terms of themes and
7 http://www.ethnologue.com. style will be more global and less local. Therefore,
3.3 · Conventional Arguments for Hollywood’s Success in Production
29 3
content that aims at export will most likely shed integration for media. The first, backward inte-
some of its domestic distinctions in favor of a gration, is when a distribution company such as
wider global appeal. “Mid-Atlantic” or “mid- a TV network produces its own inputs such as
Pacific” content emerges. An extreme example, TV shows. By doing so, the company controls
in the late 1960s, was the highly successful films the costs and quality of inputs. The other kind of
out of Italy known as “Spaghetti Westerns,” which vertical tie-in, forward integration, is when pro-
emulated American cowboy films. Given the duction firms control distribution channels. This
worldwide popularity of the genre at the time, ensures distribution, markets and supply, while
these Italian-made films were hits everywhere. also helping to create product synergy. Examples
But they were not particularly Italian in con- are when a music company or book publisher
tent. Similarly, television content, for worldwide operates its own distribution through retail stores
success, becomes export-oriented. Endemol, a or “media clubs.”
Netherlands-based firm, developed TV formats The major distribution companies handle
that were then widely franchised, such as “Big products created by their own affiliated produc-
Brother” and “Fear Factor.” There are few ele- tion companies, but they also distribute content
ments in it that are distinctively Dutch or Western produced by independent and foreign producers,
European. and even by competitors. This is true for film, TV,
The same dynamics affect American content. music, or videogames. It is also the case, in some
Not all content is equally exportable. Films with instances, for book, newspapers and magazine
action, adventure, physical comedy and special publishing.
effects generally travel well to other countries. What are the business reasons for the vertical
In contrast, comedy films are more difficult to integration of production and distribution?
translate in terms of language and subtext. Social 55 Vertical integration is advantageous to a con-
controversies such as race themes do not export tent producing company in order to control
well, either. In consequence, the tastes of foreign the release of its products and their prices
audiences affect American film themes and cast- through a “release sequence” of different out-
ing. In the casting of films, an increasingly multi- lets, different timings, coordinated planning
national set of performers is chosen for their and different prices.
marketing appeal. 55 The cross-marketing of multiple products and
A large domestic market helps content pro- a cross-platform distribution are facilitated,
duction. But it can be overcome by a firm that thereby reducing transaction costs.
“thinks globally” in its content production strat- 55 To a distributor, it is advantageous to have
egy rather than locally, and on a scale that goes assured access to products it controls, and
beyond its domestic position. It must not think of to favor those products over those of others.
exports as an aftermarket but as the market. This, Attractive content may be scarce, and supe-
however, means a reduction of the national char- rior access to it provides a distributor with
acter of the content in order to appeal to a wider market power.
audience, through themes, styles and costs. (There 55 Through vertical integration, market power
will, of course, be a few exceptions in which the can be extended from one stage of the value
very “foreign-ness” of content is its attraction.) chain to another, e.g. from distribution to
production, and used to foreclose markets to
competitors.
3.3.2 nd Supposed Advantage:
2 55 Rivals can be subjected to a vertical “price
Vertical Integration of Content squeeze” in which the wholesale market price
with Distribution? for their product is kept low by their rival’s
domination of wholesale distribution. The
Many people believe that the success of content vertically integrated rival then shifts its profit
producers requires that they control distribu- to the wholesale sector from the production
tion channels, which gives them advantages over sector. The same can be done by a company
competitors. There are two major kinds of vertical that dominates retail.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
Lady Geneviva!
GENEVIVA.
No—
The harlot, loves the harlot. You can tell me
So much of him. What, with him every day!—
All through the golden summer and no rain,
All through the autumn and its violence!
Did he fall sick of fever?
MARCOMIR.
I have known
So little of the seasons. Day and night
I prayed that God would keep you chaste. No prayer
Of mine was ever answered.
CARLOMAN.
GENEVIVA.
Ah, yes, to bathe,
And then to rise up clean.
[to Marcomir] The very moment
He spoke of youth, virginity and love
I prayed: I am alive. O Marcomir,
And there are other words of fellowship,
Of joy and youth-time. Let us hold him dear
Because he has delivered us; together
Let us give thanks, give courage each to each
Unenvious; let us talk of him once more,
Though with a difference—I will not use
Your comradeship profanely as I did,
To set you up against him in caprice,
Then leave you wild and empty. He has much
To pardon; you have more.
MARCOMIR.
No, no!
CARLOMAN.
Ah, no—
Not pardon. Where’s the need? We mortal men
Are brought to riot, brought to abstinence
That we may grow on either ready soil
The mustard-seed of pleasure, that is filled
With wings and sunny leaves. As time goes by
We shall have true relations each with each,
And with clean hearts receive the usufruct
Of what is best, and growing better still
In every soul among us.
[leading her up to Marcomir]
Geneviva,
His kiss will free your penitence, and teach you
He never could regret the past, because
It made to-day.
MARCOMIR.
[Enter Pepin.]
PEPIN.
Holy brothers,
At last I join you. Come, this is unseemly ...
A pleasant dame—but not within my palace
Shall you be tempted to forsake your vows.
[to Geneviva.]
Go, get your lovers on the highway; here
You bring disgrace.
(to Carloman in a low voice) A courtesan.
CARLOMAN.
My wife.
PEPIN.
CARLOMAN.
PEPIN.
CARLOMAN.
On my oath,
I could not be her keeper, Carloman.
CARLOMAN.
PEPIN.
CARLOMAN.
Ah, yes.
I have not flesh as full of life as yours;
Why, your mere touch can warm one like the sun.
PEPIN.
PEPIN.
CARLOMAN.
PEPIN.
[close to him]
What are you come for?
CARLOMAN.
I am come to live,
To share again your counsels.
PEPIN.
PEPIN.
Willingly
I hear advice; but now the throne is mine
Decision rests with me and not with you,
Who have been shut away from everything
But prayers and convent-policy. Forgive,
We are no longer equals—you a Saint,
I a mere statesman. But you have not said
One word about the cloister.
CARLOMAN.
Do we waste
Much talk on vaults, we men who are alive?
PEPIN.
CARLOMAN.
PEPIN.
CARLOMAN.
Astolph the Lombard.
PEPIN.
CARLOMAN.
PEPIN.
CARLOMAN.
PEPIN.
The Pope is here.
CARLOMAN.
Impossible!
PEPIN.
He reached us yesterday.
CARLOMAN.
PEPIN.
I am.
CARLOMAN.
PEPIN.
I, break my treaty,
And ruin my whole scheme!
CARLOMAN.
The Pope is gray,
And Astolph young and sound in force as you.
Which is the deadlier foe?
PEPIN.
CARLOMAN.
Go back!
Go back!
PEPIN.
CARLOMAN.
I have.
PEPIN.
CARLOMAN.
PEPIN.
Of yourself
You left the world.
CARLOMAN.
PEPIN.
CARLOMAN.
How horrible! I never will go back;
But I can live without my brother’s love,
For ties are not existence.
PEPIN.
CARLOMAN.
I must live.
[to Zacharias.]
ZACHARIAS.
PEPIN.
He has left
His convent, and is here to plead the cause
Of Astolph, the arch-heretic.
ZACHARIAS.
My son,
Defend yourself.
CARLOMAN.
BONIFACE.
CARLOMAN.
BONIFACE.
As a monk
I left the English cloister, with a blessing
From him who ruled me. Is it as a monk,
Oh, is it—that we see you in our midst?
CARLOMAN.
No, no, enfranchised!
[suddenly standing forth] Hear me! The I am
Has sent me to you and has given me power
To rend your idols, for you have not known
The God I worship. He is just to-day—
Not dreaming of the future,—in itself,
Breath after breath divine! Oh, He becomes!
He cannot be of yesterday, for youth
Could not then walk beside Him, and the young
Must walk with God: and He is most alive
Wherever life is of each living thing.
To-morrow and to-morrow—those to-days
Of unborn generations; the I am
To none of them a memory or a hope,
To each the thirst, the wine-cup and the wine,
The craving, the satiety—my God!
O Holy Father, you who sway the world
Through Him, must not deny Him.
ZACHARIAS.
I deny!
God does not alter; you have changed to Him
Who is Eternal.
CARLOMAN.
ZACHARIAS.
No, you are dead to what you dare blaspheme,
To what the cloister holds, if any place
Can hold it, the immutability
Of God’s inherent nature, while without
His words are trying men by chance and change
And manifold desires. You left His works
Behind, you chose Himself: your oath was taken
To His deep heart; and now you would forswear
That oath, you cannot. No one who blasphemes
The light of God shall see the light of day:
For him the darkness and for him the grave.
I am no more your father, but your judge,
Who represents the God you have disowned,
Insulted and forgotten. He requites—
And you shall answer to the uttermost.
CARLOMAN.
I can.
ZACHARIAS.
CARLOMAN.
ZACHARIAS.
ZACHARIAS.
CARLOMAN.
In fast brotherhood.
ZACHARIAS.
PEPIN.
Holy Father,
I pray you send him back, but spare his life—
Spare him, if I have power with you.
ZACHARIAS.
His doom
Is but his choice made permanent on earth.
[to Carloman] O fallen from blessedness of will, become
The friend of heretics, the false of word
To everlasting Truth, you are condemned
Life-long to be a prisoner in your cell,
Life-long to watch the scourge and crucifix.
You chose them, as the God whom you abjure
Chose them, forever; you have lapsed and they
Become tormentors, till they force contrition
At last and save you.
CARLOMAN.
ZACHARIAS.
At Vienne,
There till you die the prison you have made
Of an eternal vow shall compass you.
CARLOMAN.
[He throws both arms over his face, then suddenly removing them, makes a
frenzied movement closer to the Pope.]
Let me die
Here, now! It is most impious, horrible
To bury me, full to the lips with life.
Sharpness-of-death, give that, but not to feel
The prison walls close on an energy
Beating its claim to worlds.
ZACHARIAS.
BONIFACE.
CARLOMAN.
And is hell—
But I reject such love.
O Pepin, listen!
I see so far! Your pact with Rome undoes
Long centuries, and yields your country up
To spiritless restriction, and a future
Entombed alive, as mine will be, in night.
Simply renounce your promise, bid your soldiers
Seize the old man who numbs us. You and I
Could set to music that would never end
The forces of our people.
PEPIN.
You are crazy
Or worse, and I disown you.
[to Zacharias] On his head
Let fall what curse you will.
ZACHARIAS.
[moving up to the royal board that crosses the hall at the further end]
The treaty—sign!
CARLOMAN.
Be true to him.
MARCOMIR.
I will.
GENEVIVA.
Then share
His prison—say you left his monastery,
Step forth and save him from his loneliness,
My Marcomir, his friend. This is the moment;
And, as you love him, speak.
MARCOMIR.
GENEVIVA.
MARCOMIR.