During scrutiny of HTC bills for the month Dec23 to Feb-24, the following discrepancies are found:

DEC-2023
Bank Reply furnished Further observation(s)
Name of labor Wage sheet EPF ESIC Discrepancy
statement
Prakash Sahoo & As the concerned HTC has
Prakash Sahu furnished undertaking “that
are One and same the mistake name in
person. Due EPFO/ESIC portal would
to be rectified as soon as
4.Prakash Prakash
Prakash Sahu Name mismatch typing error of name in possible. We
Sahoo Sahoo
ESIC Will make efforts to rectify
portal name c hang ed within 2months of time.”
to Prakash Hence, suitable action may
Sahu. be proposed as per rules in
vogue.
Rs. 5184 taken as Complied and found to be
advance was correct.
mistakenly omitted
12. Sanatan Credit Amount
Rs. 13,011.00 Rs. 7827.00 from the
Jena mismatch
wag e sheet. Revised
wage sheet
attached
Actual ESIC Reply found satisfactory.
Contribution is Rs.
30. D Bhagabati ESIC Dedn. 54.33, Extra Amount
Rs. 54.00 Rs.55.00
Rao mismatch was
deposited in Round i.e.
Rs. 55
Name of (Actual-Dipak As per attached revised
kumar wage sheet for DEC-23, no
Dipak Surya) was mistakenly rectification has been
37. Deepak Deepak Dipak Kumar
Kumar Name mismatch typed as made by the concerned
Surya Surya Surya
Surya (Deepak Surya- HTC.
Wrong). Revised
wag e sheet attached.
Name of (Actual- Complied and found to be
Bijaya Patra) correct.
was mistakenly typed
45. Patra Bijaya as (Patra
Patra Bijaya Bijaya Patra Name mismatch
Bijaya Patra Bijaya -
Wrong). Revised wag e
sheet
attached.
Rs. 462 excesses Reply found satisfactory.
deposited in
50. Mahadev Rs. Credit Amount
Rs. 9038.00 the bank A/c due to the
Rana 9500.00 mismatch
work
other than FCI.
Satyaban Bhokta & As the concerned HTC has
Satyaban furnished undertaking “that
Bhukta are One and the mistake name in
same person. EPFO/ESIC portal would
52. Satyaban Satyaban Satyaban Name mismatch in
Due to typing error of be rectified as soon as
Bhokta Bhokta Bhukta EPF
name in possible. We
EPFO portal name Will make efforts to rectify
changed to within 2months of time.”
Satyaban Bhukta. Hence, suitable action may
Kishore Chandra be proposed as per rules in
Muduli & Kishor vogue.
Kishore Kishor Kishore
53.Kishore Chandra Muduli are
Chandra Chandra Chandra Name mismatch
Chandra Muduli One and
Muduli Muduli Muduli
same person. Due to
typing error
 of name
in ESIC portal name
changed to
Kishor Chandra Muduli.
Name of (Actual- Revised wage sheet page
Santosh Kumar not attached by concerned
Panigrahy) was HTC.
58. Santosh Santosh Santosh Santosh
mistakenly typed
Kumar Kumar Kumar Kumar Name mismatch
as (Santosh Kumar
Panigrahi Panigrahi Panigrahy Panigrahy
Panigrahi -Wrong).
Revised wage sheet
attached.
Name of (Actual- Dilip
Kumar Naik) was
mistakenly
Dilip Kumar Dilip Kumar
63.Dillip Naik Dillip Naik Name mismatch typed as (Dillip Naik -
Naik Naik
Wrong).
Revised wag e sheet
attached.
Budu Poiba & Budu As the concerned HTC has
Paiba are furnished undertaking “that
One and same person. the mistake name in
Due to EPFO/ESIC portal would be
typing error of name in rectified as soon as possible.
Name mismatch in
73. Budu Poiba Budu Poiba Budu Paiba EPFO We
EPF
portal name c hanged Will make efforts to rectify
to Budu within 2months of time.”
Poiba Hence, suitable action may
be proposed as per rules in
vogue.
Name of (Actual- Complied and found to be
Jhumak Lal correct.
Parabhue) was
mistakenly typed
80. Jhumak Lal Jhumak Lal Jhumak Lal Jhumak Lal
Name mismatch as (Jhumak Lal
Parabhoi Parabhoi Parabhue Parabhue
Parabhoi
-Wrong).
Revised wage sheet
attached.

JAN-2024

Reply furnished Further

Name of labor Wage sheet EPF ESIC Discrepancy observation(s)
Name of (Actual-Dipak As per attached
kumar revised wage sheet
Surya) was mistakenly for JAN-24, no
Dipak Kumar
37. Deepak Surya Deepak Surya Dipak Kumar Surya Name mismatch typ ed as (Deepak rectification has
Surya
Surya-Wrong). been made by the
Revised wage sheet concerned HTC.
attached.
ESIC Challa No.- Complied and found
044241121319 40 to be correct.
14. Babu Swain Rs. 113. Rs. 78. ESIC mismatch
(Copy
attached)
Name of (Actual-Bijaya
Patra) was mistakenly
typed as (Patra Bijaya
15. Patra Bijaya Patra Bijaya Bijaya Patra Bijaya Patra Name mismatch
Wrong).
Revised wage
sheet attached.
 Kishore Chandra As the concerned
Muduli & HTC has furnished
Kishor Chandra Muduli undertaking “that
are the mistake name in
One and same person. EPFO/ESIC portal
Due to would be rectified
Kishor typing error of name in as soon as possible.
52. Kishore Chandra Kishore Chandra Kishor Chandra
Chandra Name mismatch ESIC We
Muduli Muduli Muduli
Muduli portal name changed Will make efforts to
to Kishor rectify within
Chandra Muduli. 2months of time.”
Hence, suitable
action may be
proposed as per
rules in vogue.
Name of (Actual- Complied and found
Santosh to be correct.
Kumar Panigrahy) was
Santosh mistakenly typed as
57. Santosh Kumar Santosh Kumar Santosh Kumar
Kumar Name mismatch (Santosh
Panigrahi Panigrahi Panigrahy
Panigrahy Kumar Panigrahi -
Wrong).
Revised wage sheet
attached.
Name of (Actual- Dilip
Kumar Naik) was
mistakenly
Dilip Kumar
62.Dillip Naik Dillip Naik Dilip Kumar Naik Name mismatch typed as (Dillip Naik -
Naik
Wrong).
Revised wag e sheet
attached.
Budu Poiba & Budu As the concerned
Paiba are HTC has furnished
One and same person. undertaking “that
Due to the mistake name in
typing error of name in EPFO/ESIC portal
EPFO would be rectified
portal name chang ed as soon as possible.
Name mismatch in
71. Budu Poiba Budu Poiba Budu Paiba to Budu We
EPF
Poiba. Will make efforts to
rectify within
2months of time.”
Hence, suitable
action may be
proposed as per
rules in vogue.
Name of (Actual- Complied and found
Jhumak Lal to be correct.
Parabhue) was
mistakenly
78. Jhumak Lal Jhumak Lal Jhumak Lal Jhumak Lal
Name mismatch typed as (Jhumak Lal
Parabhoi Parabhoi Parabhue Parabhue
Parabhoi
- Wrong). Revised
wage sheet
attached.
Prakash Sahoo & As the concerned
Prakash HTC has furnished
Sahu are One and undertaking “that
Name mismatch in same person the mistake name in
4.Prakash Sahoo Prakash Sahoo Prakash Sahu
ESIC Due to typing error of EPFO/ESIC portal
name in would be rectified
ESIC portal name as soon as possible.
changed to We
 Prakash Sahu. Will make efforts to
rectify within
Satyaban Bhokta & 2months of time.”
Satyaban Hence, suitable
Bhukta are One and action may be
same proposed as per
Name mismatch in person. Due to typing rules in vogue.
51. Satyaban Bhokta Satyaban Bhokta Satyaban Bhukta
EPF error of
name in EPFO portal
name
changed to Satyab an
Bhokta

FEB-2024

Bank Reply Further

Name of labor Wage sheet EPF ESIC Discrepancy
statement furnished observation(s)
Name of Complied and found
(Actual-Dipak to be correct.
kumar
Surya) was
mistakenly
Dipak Kumar Dipak Kumar
37. Deepak Surya Deepak Surya Name mismatch typed as
Surya Surya
(Deepak
Surya-Wrong).
Revised
wage sheet
attached.
Name of
(Actual- Dilip
Kumar Naik)
was
Dilip Kumar mistakenly
62.Dillip Naik Dillip Naik Dilip Kumar Naik Name mismatch
Naik typed as (Dillip
Naik -Wrong ).
Revised wag e
sheet
attached.
Kishore As the concerned
Chandra HTC has furnished
Muduli & undertaking “that
Kishor the mistake name in
Chandra EPFO/ESIC portal
Muduli are would be rectified
One and as soon as possible.
Kishor same person. We
52. Kishore Kishore Chandra Kishor Chandra
Chandra Name mismatch Due to typing Will make efforts to
Chandra Muduli Muduli Muduli
Muduli error rectify within
of name in 2months of time.”
ESIC portal Hence, suitable
name action may be
c hanged to proposed as per
Kishor rules in vogue.
Chandra
Muduli.
Budu Poib a &
Budu Paiba
are
71. Budu Poiba Budu Poiba Budu Paiba Name mismatch One and same
person. Due to
typing error of
name in EPFO
 p ortal name
changed to
Budu Poiba
Name of Complied and found
(Actual- to be correct.
Jhumak Lal
Parabhue)
was
78. Jhumak Lal Jhumak Lal Jhumak Lal Jhumak Lal mistakenly
Name mismatch
Parabhoi Parabhoi Parabhue Parabhue typed as
(Jhumak Lal
Parabhoi
- Wrong).
Revised wage
sheet
Name of
(Actual-
Pratap
Rajhans) was
mistakenly
typed
83. Pratap Kumar Pratap Kumar
Pratap Rajhans Name mismatch as (Pratap
Rajhans Rajhans
Kumar
Rajhans
-Wrong).
Revised
wage sheet
attached.
Name of
(Actual-
Santosh
Kumar
Panigrahy)
was
Santosh mistakenly
57. Santosh Santosh Kumar Santosh Kumar
Kumar Name mismatch typed
Kumar Panigrahi Panigrahi Panigrahy
Panigrahy as (Santosh
Kumar
Panigrahi -
Wrong).
Revised wag e
sheet
attached.
Satyaban As the concerned
Bhokta & HTC has furnished
Satyaban undertaking “that
Bhukta are the mistake name in
One and same EPFO/ESIC portal
person. would be rectified
Due to typing as soon as possible.
51. Satyaban Name mismatch in
Satyaban Bhokta Satyaban Bhukta error of name We
Bhokta EPF
in Will make efforts to
EPFO portal rectify within
name changed 2months of time.”
to Hence, suitable
Satyaban action may be
Bhokta proposed as per
rules in vogue.
Name of Complied and found
(Actual- Bijaya to be correct.
Patra Bijaya Bijaya Patra Bijaya Patra Name mismatch Patra)
44. Patra Bijaya
was
mistakenly
 typed as
(Patra
Bijaya -
Wrong).
Revised wage
sheet
attached.
Name of As per attached
(Actual-Dip ak revised wage sheet
kumar for FEB-24, no
Surya) was rectification has
mistakenly been made by the
Dipak Kumar Dipak Kumar
37. Deepak Surya Deepak Surya Name mismatch typed as concerned HTC.
Surya Surya
(Deepak
Surya-Wrong).
Revised
wage sheet
attached.
Prakash As the concerned
Sahoo & HTC has furnished
Prakash Sahu undertaking “that
are One and the mistake name in
same person. EPFO/ESIC portal
Due would be rectified
to typing error as soon as possible.
Name mismatch in
4.Prakash Sahoo Prakash Sahoo Prakash Sahu of name in We
ESIC
ESIC Will make efforts to
portal name rectify within
changed to 2months of time.”
Prakash Hence, suitable
Sahu. action may be
proposed as per
rules in vogue.
ESIC Challan Differential ESIC
No. -04424112 has been deposited
21. Jatadhari
Rs. 113 Rs.12 Mismatch ESIC 135078 by concerned HTC.
Swain
(Copy
attached)
21. Jatadhari Credit amount Rs. 6 00 Reply found
Rs.763 Rs. 1363 excesses satisfactory.
Swain mismatch
deposited in
the bank A/c d
Credit amount ue to the work
Narayan DAS Rs.4810 Rs.5410
mismatch other than
FCI.