Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Advantages of Authentic Assessment:

 Provides teachers with the true picture of how and where their students are in
their learning; gives more information about their students’ strengths,
weaknesses, needs and preferences that aid them in adjusting instruction
towards enhanced teaching and learning.
 Provides students many alternatives/ways to demonstrate best what they
have learned; offers a wide array of interesting and challenging assessment
activities.
 Assessment is integrated with instruction.
 Reveals and enriches the students’ high level cognitive skills: from
knowledge and comprehension to analysis, synthesis, application and
evaluation.
 Enhances students’ ability to apply skills and knowledge to real lie situations;
taps high order cognitive and problem solving skills.
 Teaches the test.
 Student-structured: students are more engaged in their learning; assessment
results guide instruction.
 Oftentimes involves students working in groups hence promotes team work,
collaborative and interpersonal skills.
 Reduces anxiety and creates a more relaxed happy atmosphere that boosts
learning.
 Time is flexible.
 Focuses on the growth of the learner; Learners express their understanding
of the learning content using their preferred multiple forms of intelligences.
 Provides parents and community with more observable products, proofs of
the students’ learning which motivate them to support their kids’ learning
more.

Disadvantages of Authentic Assessment:

 • Resource-Intensive: Educators may need to invest a lot of time and


resources in designing and conducting authentic assessments. It might be
necessary to develop hypothetical situations, give forth resources, and give
each pupil a personal assessment.
 • Subjectivity: Judging the quality of authentic assignments might be more
subjective than judging the quality of multiple-choice questions or
standardized tests, which makes it difficult to assure fairness and consistency
in grading.
 • Assessment Validity and Reliability: The credibility of authentic assessments
may be impacted by the fact that they may not be as standardized and may
not possess the same level of validity and reliability as conventional
assessments.
 Logistical Challenges: Coordinating and managing authentic assessments
can be logistically challenging, especially for large classes or online courses.
 Scalability: It may be difficult to scale authentic assessments to accommodate
a large number of students or diverse contexts.
 Assessment Pressure: Some students may experience extra pressure when
examinations are linked to practical outcomes, which could affect their
performance.
 Assessment Bias: Since students' prior experiences and backgrounds may
have an impact on their capacity to accomplish real-world tasks, there is a
potential of inadvertent bias in authentic assessments.

 In conclusion, authentic learning exams provide a more meaningful and


engaging way to test students' abilities and knowledge, but they also present
logistical, subjective, and resource allocation concerns. To address the
various demands of students and educational situations, it's crucial to find a
balance between authentic and traditional evaluation approaches.

Which is better authentic assessment or traditional assessment?

 Authentic assessment, because they measure how well students can apply
what they have learned to actual circumstances, genuine evaluations are
frequently more useful than traditional ones. Children must learn how to apply
their knowledge and skills to new settings as soon as possible while they are
young.

You might also like