RUBRICS IN SCORING GROUP ACTIVITIES/PRESENTATION/REPORTING

This rubric evaluates the learners' oral presentations in their group activity. This analytic rubric focuses on both the group's process (during group activity) and output
(presented report). This rubric also aims to quantify students' performance in terms of explanation and content, teamwork and cooperation, ppt background, and
promptness.

R E S P O N S E S
CRITERIA TOTAL
5 4 3 2 1
The presenter The presenter
The presenter The presenter
explained the task frequently reads what The presenter simply
thoroughly explained explained the task in a
while reading what is is written in the read the entire
EXPLANATION and the task and provided clear manner, and
written on the output. output. There is no output. It contains a
CONTENT additional some details were
There was very little new information. lot of code shits and
(50%) explanations for the included. Has
additional information There have been explains the task in
output. Has excellent excellent
added. Has code numerous code Filipino.
communication skills communication skills.
shifting. changes.
5 4 3 2 1
The students show
The students work Although the majority The majority of the
camaraderie despite There is no evidence
TEAMWORK AND together admirably to of the students are students are not
the fact that some of of teamwork, and only
COOPERATION complete the task. not participating, participating, and only
them are not paying the leader is
(20%) Everyone in the group there is camaraderie a few members are
attention or performing the task.
is taking part. among the students. carrying out the task.
participating.
5 4 3 2 1
The design is
The design was There was no design
appealing and relevant The design was poor,
The design is good, adequate, though at all, and the
PPT Design to the course. and it was difficult to
and it connects to and there were some reporter made no
(15%) Although there are understand for the
applies to the course. artifacts that were attempt to match
some artifacts that are audience.
unrelated to it. their background.
unrelated to it.
5 4 3 2 1
The task was Despite the fact that
The task was
completed ahead of the output was The group struggled to
PROMPTNESS completed on time The group did not
schedule, despite the completed in a hurry, complete the task in
(15%) and in an effective and complete the task.
rushed appearance of the group completed the allotted time.
efficient manner.
the output. it on time.

TOTAL
Here is an example of an analytic rubric for PRESENTATION/REPORTING. Your task is to create an exact image of this analytic rubric focusing on this topic, “Dance Performance in PE”. Your
output will paste on a long bond paper either drawing or electronic one. Use the same template like the one above. You will be graded with this rubric down here.
Criteria 5 4
Understanding The student demonstrates
of Lesson a deep understanding of
(50%) the lesson and applies it
effectively in creating the
analytic rubric.
Organization The rubric is well-
(15%) organized, with clear
headings and a logical
structure that enhances
readability and
understanding.
Clarity of The criteria in the rubric
Criteria (20%) are clearly defined and
specific, leaving no room
for ambiguity or confusion.
Use of The rubric includes well-
Descriptors written descriptors for each
(15%) level of achievement,
providing clear guidance for
assessing performance.
Grammar and The rubric is free from
Spelling grammar and spelling
errors, enhancing
readability and
professionalism.
The student demonstrates
a good understanding of
the lesson and applies it
appropriately in creating
the analytic rubric.
The rubric is organized,
with mostly clear headings
and a structure that allows
for easy comprehension.
The criteria in the rubric
are mostly clear and
specific, with only minor
instances of ambiguity or
confusion.
The rubric includes
descriptors for each level
of achievement, but they
could be more precise and
provide better guidance.
The rubric has only minor
grammar and spelling
errors that do not
significantly affect
readability or
professionalism.
3 2
The student demonstrates an
average understanding of the
lesson and applies it
adequately in creating the
analytic rubric.
The rubric has some
organization, but the
headings and structure could
be clearer for better
readability and
understanding.
The criteria in the rubric are
somewhat clear and specific,
but there are instances of
ambiguity or confusion.
The rubric includes some
descriptors for each level of
achievement, but they are
not consistently precise and
may not provide adequate
guidance.
The rubric has some grammar
and spelling errors that may
slightly affect readability or
professionalism.
The student demonstrates
a limited understanding of
the lesson and applies it
partially in creating the
analytic rubric.
The rubric lacks
organization, making it
difficult to follow and
understand the
assessment criteria.
The criteria in the rubric
are unclear and lack
specificity, leading to
significant ambiguity or
confusion.
The rubric includes limited
descriptors for each level
of achievement, making it
difficult to assess
performance accurately.
The rubric has multiple
grammar and spelling
errors that affect
readability and
professionalism.
1
The student demonstrates a
poor understanding of the
lesson and does not
effectively apply it in
creating the analytic rubric.
The rubric is disorganized
and does not effectively
communicate the
assessment criteria.
The criteria in the rubric are
extremely unclear and lack
specificity, making it
impossible to understand
the assessment criteria.
The rubric does not include
any descriptors for each
level of achievement,
making it impossible to
assess performance
accurately.
The rubric is riddled with
grammar and spelling
errors, making it difficult to
read and lacking
professionalism.