Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Unit 5 5 1 Notes
Unit 5 5 1 Notes
Usually, the project managers use this method for simplifying the
project execution.
In WBS, much larger tasks are broken down to manageable chunks
of work.
These chunks can be easily supervised and estimated.
WBS is not restricted to a specific field when it comes to application.
This methodology can be used for any type of project management.
Construction of a WBS
Identifying the main deliverables of a project is the starting point for
deriving a work breakdown structure.
This important step is usually done by the project managers and the
subject matter experts (SMEs) involved in the project.
Once this step is completed, the subject matter experts start breaking
down the high-level tasks into smaller chunks of work.
In the process of breaking down the tasks, one can break them down
into different levels of detail.
One can detail a high-level task into ten sub-tasks while another can
detail the same high-level task into 20 sub-tasks.
There are many design goals for WBS. Some important goals are as
follows:
Giving visibility to important work efforts.
Giving visibility to risky work efforts.
Illustrate the correlation between the activities and deliverables.
Show clear ownership by task leaders.
WBS Diagram
In a WBS diagram, the project scope is graphically expressed.
Usually the diagram starts with a graphic object or a box at the top,
which represents the entire project.
Then, there are sub-components under the box. These boxes
represent the deliverables of the project.
Under each deliverable, there are sub-elements listed. These sub-
elements are the activities that should be performed in order to
achieve the deliverables.
Although most of the WBS diagrams are designed based on the
deliveries, some WBS are created based on the project phases.
Usually, information technology projects are perfectly fit into WBS
model. Therefore, almost all information technology projects make
use of WBS.
In addition to the general use of WBS, there is specific objective for
deriving a WBS.
WBS is the input for Gantt charts, a tool that is used for project
management purpose.
Gantt chart is used for tracking the progression of the tasks derived
by WBS.
Following is a sample WBS diagram:
Chapter 5 SEN For CO4I (A+B) BY – VAISHALI RANE Page 3 of 50
5.1.3 Activity Network
An Activity Network Diagram (AND) is also called an Arrow Diagram
(because the pictorial display has arrows in it) or a PERT (Program
Evaluation Review Technique) Diagram, and it is used for identifying time
sequences of events which are pivotal to objectives.
In Critical Path Analysis this helps the teams to comprehend or understand
specific event sequences driving time requirements for objective
achievement.
Activity Network Diagrams are also very useful when a project has multiple
activities which need simultaneous management.
Activity Network Diagrams started out as an engineering and construction
project management tool.
Critical Path Analysis draws on this methodology to identify and
standardize medical management activities.
An Activity Network Diagram helps to find out the most efficient sequence of
events needed to complete any project. It enables you to create a realistic
project schedule by graphically showing :
Advantages of CPM:
1. It helps in determining the time schedule of activities having sequential
relationship.
2. It makes control easier for the management.
3. It identifies the most critical elements in the project. Thus, the management
is kept alert and prepared to pay due attention to the critical activities of the
project.
4. It makes better and detailed planning possible.
Limitation of CPM:
1. CPM operates on the assumption that there is a precise known time that each
activity in the project will take. But, it may not be true in real practice.
2. CPM time estimates are not based on statistical analysis.
3. It cannot be used as a controlling device for the simple reason that any
change introduced will change the entire structure of network. In other words,
CPM cannot be used as a dynamic controlling device.
5.1.5 Program Evaluation & Review Technique (PERT)
The program (or project) evaluation and review technique (PERT) is a
statistical tool used in project management, which was designed to analyze
and represent the tasks involved in completing a given project.
First developed by the United States Navy in the 1950s, it is commonly used in
conjunction with the critical path method (CPM).
In PERT, these three estimate times are derived for each activity.
This way, a range of time is given for each activity with the most probable
value, TLIKELY.
Following are further details on each estimate:
1. TOPT
This is the fastest time an activity can be completed. For this, the assumption is
made that all the necessary resources are available and all predecessor
activities are completed as planned.
2. TLIKELY
Most of the times, project managers are asked only to submit one estimate. In
that case, this is the estimate that goes to the upper management.
3. TPESS
This is the maximum time required to complete an activity. In this case, it is
assumed that many things go wrong related to the activity. A lot of rework and
resource unavailability are assumed when this estimation is derived.
Advantages
PERT chart explicitly defines and makes
visible dependencies (precedence relationships) between the work
breakdown structure (commonly WBS) elements.
PERT facilitates identification of the critical path and makes this visible.
PERT facilitates identification of early start, late start, and slack for
each activity.
PERT provides for potentially reduced project duration due to better
understanding of dependencies leading to improved overlapping of
activities and tasks where feasible.
The large amount of project data can be organized and presented in
diagram for use in decision making.
Chapter 5 SEN For CO4I (A+B) BY – VAISHALI RANE Page 7 of 50
PERT can provide a probability of completing before a
given time. Disadvantages
There can be potentially hundreds or thousands of activities and
individual dependency relationships.
PERT is not easily scalable for smaller projects.
The network charts tend to be large and unwieldy, requiring
several pages to print and requiring specially-sized paper.
The lack of a timeframe on most PERT/CPM charts makes it
harder to show status, although colours can help, e.g., specific
colour for completed nodes.