Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Human Factors Handbook For Process Plant Operations Improving Process Safety and System Performance 1St Edition Ccps Center For Chemical Process Safety Full Chapter
Human Factors Handbook For Process Plant Operations Improving Process Safety and System Performance 1St Edition Ccps Center For Chemical Process Safety Full Chapter
A Joint Publication of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers and John Wiley &
Sons, Inc.
The rights of CCPS to be identified as the author of the editorial material in this work
have been asserted in accordance with law.
Registered Office
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA
Editorial Office
111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA
For details of our global editorial offices, customer services, and more information
about Wiley products visit us at www.wiley.com.
Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats and by print-on-demand.
Some content that appears in standard print versions of this book may not be available
in other formats.
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
This book is one in a series of process safety guidelines and concept books
published by the Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS). Refer to
www.wiley.com/go/ccps for full list of titles in this series.
It is sincerely hoped that the information presented in this document will lead to
a better safety record for the entire industry; however, neither the American
Institute of Chemical Engineers, its consultants, CCPS Technical Steering
Committee and Subcommittee members, their employers, their employers'
officers and directors, nor Greenstreet Berman, Ltd., and its employees and
subcontractors warrant or represent, expressly or by implication, the correctness
or accuracy of the content of the information presented in this document. As
between (1) American Institute of Chemical Engineers, its consultants, CCPS
Technical Steering Committee and Subcommittee members, their employers, their
employers' officers and directors, and Greenstreet Berman, Ltd., and its
employees and subcontractors, and (2) the user of this document, the user accepts
any legal liability or responsibility whatsoever for the consequence of its use or
misuse.
Human Factors Handbook for Process Plant Operations
is dedicated to
Jack L. McCavit
Jack is passionate about process safety, especially in the areas of culture and
human factors. His work, both in his career at Celanese, and after his retirement,
has concentrated on educating workers and industry leaders on the importance
of process safety, the payback of sustaining a great program, and most
importantly, the impact of not making process safety a top priority. Jack had first-
hand experience with the latter when he witnessed a butane vapor cloud explosion
at the Celanese site in Pampa, Texas, in 1987, resulting in three fatalities and
dozens of injuries. Based on his significant and relevant expertise, Jack was
selected as the technical manager for the prominent Baker Panel investigation of
the BP Texas City Explosion in 2005.
Jack is a CCPS Fellow, an AIChE Fellow, and is rumored to be the fifth most famous
Texan in history. He was the committee chair for the CCPS flagship book,
Guidelines for Risk Based Process Safety, and a driving force behind CCPS’s Vision
20/20.
Part 3: Equipment............................................................................................ 91
9 Human Factors in equipment design ..................................................... 93
9.1 Learning objectives of this Chapter ............................................ 93
9.2 Definitions ...................................................................................... 93
9.3 Major accident example ............................................................... 94
Table of Contents xi
18.3 Why do we fail to capture, challenge, and correct errors? ... 217
18.4 Coaching people to recognize risk of making errors ............. 218
18.5 Error Management Training ...................................................... 220
18.6 Enabling challenge of task performance ................................. 224
18.7 Key learning points from this Chapter..................................... 231
19 Communicating information and instructions ................................... 233
19.1 Learning objectives of this Chapter ......................................... 233
19.2 Incident example ........................................................................ 233
19.3 Causes of poor communication ............................................... 234
19.4 Human Factors of communications ......................................... 235
19.5 Avoiding communication overload .......................................... 237
19.6 Human Factors in shift handover ............................................. 241
19.7 Key learning points from this Chapter..................................... 245
APPENDICES
Index................................................................................................................ 437
List of Figures
Accident: An event that can cause (or has caused) significant harm to workers, the
environment, property, and the surrounding community.
Anthropometrics: The science of measuring the size and proportions of the
human body (called anthropometry), especially as applied to the design of
furniture and machines.
Behavioral marker: Non-technical behaviors that can be observed and described.
They refer to a prescribed set of behaviors and are indicative of specific types of
non-technical skills performance (e.g., effective decision-making in emergencies)
within a work environment.
Cognitive overload: A mental state where an individual is unable to process all
the information provided by the system.
Cognitive underload: A mental state when an individual is under-stimulated due
to insufficient workload. This mental state leads to lack of attention.
Competency Assessment: System which allows measuring and documenting
personnel competency. The goal of competency assessment is to identify
problems with employee performance, and to correct these issues before they
affect performance.
Competency: Set of skills and knowledge which enables a person to perform tasks
efficiently, reliably and safely to a defined standard.
Competency Gap: Difference between the current competency level and the
required competency level of an employee.
Competency Management: Method of categorizing and tracking the
development of individual employee competency, allowing an organization to
track progress, and identify future training needs.
Fatigue: Fatigue is a decline in physical and/or mental performance.
Hold Points: Point where change cannot happen until there has been verification
that the prerequisites have been achieved.
Human Error: Intended or unintended human action or inaction that produces an
unintended result. This includes, but is not limited to, actions by designers,
operators, planners/schedulers, maintainers, engineers or managers that may
contribute to or result in accidents [1].
Human Factors: Discipline concerned with designing machines, operations, and
work environments so they match human capabilities, limitations, and needs. This
includes any technical work (engineering, procedure writing, worker training,
worker selection, operations, maintenance, etc.) related to the human interface in
human-machine systems [1].
Human Performance: Measure of an individual’s ability to execute a task
effectively.
Incident: Event, or series of events, resulting in one or more undesirable
consequences, such as harm to people, damage to the environment, or
asset/business losses.
xxiv Human Factors Handbook
Job aid: Specific information or material intended to help workers execute a task
more effectively.
Learning: Acquisition of knowledge or skills through study, experience, or being
taught.
Major accident: Major accident means an occurrence such as a major emission,
fire, or explosion resulting from uncontrolled developments in the course of the
operation of any establishment, and leading to serious danger to human health or
the environment (whether immediate or delayed) inside or outside the
establishment, and involving one or more dangerous substances [2].
Mistake: A decision or judgement that is misguided.
Non-technical skills: The cognitive, social, and personal resource skills that
complement technical skills and contribute to safe and efficient task execution [3].
Performance Influencing Factors (PIFs): Characteristics of the job, the individual
and the organization that influence human performance [4].
Performance standards: Description of how the job is a description of what
(actions/tasks) needs to be taken/executed, how the job must be done
(behaviors/methods) and outcomes/results that will define satisfactory or
acceptable performance.
Psychological safety: The outcome of an open workplace culture where people
are willing to express an opinion, or admit mistakes or unsafe behaviors, without
fear of being embarrassed, rejected, or punished.
Root cause: Fundamental, underlying, system-related reason why an incident
occurred that identifies a correctable failure(s) in management systems. There is
typically more than one root cause for every process safety incident.
Rota: A period of work taken in rotation with other workers (an abbreviation of
rotation).
Rotation: A period of work taken in rotation with other workers.
Shift working (shifts): Work which takes place on a schedule outside traditional
day work hours. It can involve evening or night shifts, early morning shifts, and
rotating shifts.
Training: “Practical instruction in job and task requirements and methods.
Training may be provided in a classroom or at the workplace, and its objectives are
to enable workers to meet some minimum initial performance standards
(minimum required competency level), maintain their proficiency, or to qualify
them for promotion to a more demanding position” [5].
Vigilance decrement: Decline in “the ability to sustain attention and remain alert
to a particular stimulus over a prolonged period of time” [6].
Acronyms
Acronym Meaning
ANP Agência Nacional do Petróleo (Brazil Petroleum Regulator)
BP British Petroleum
CCPS Center for Chemical Process Safety
CK Checklist
CSB Chemical Safety Board
CRM Crew Resource Management
DCS Distributed Control System
DFC Diagnostic Flow Charts
DIF Difficulty, Importance and Frequency Analysis
DOE Department of Energy
DT Decision Tree or Diagnostic Tree
EEMUA Engineering Equipment and Materials Users Association
FCCU Fluidized catalytic cracking unit
GC Grab Card
GUI Graphical User Interface
HIRA Hazard Identification and Risk Analysis
ICAO International Civil Aviation Organization
IChemE Institute of Chemical Engineers
IOGP International Association of Oil and Gas Producers
ISO International Standards Institute
ISOM Isomerization
LEL Lower Explosive Level
LFL Lower Flammability Level
LOPA Layers of Protection Analysis
MDMT Minimum design metal temperature
MEB Material and Energy Balance
MOC Management of Change
NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organization
xxvi Human Factors Handbook
Acronym Meaning
OIM Offshore Installation Manager
OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Agency
PFD Process Flow Diagram
P&ID Piping and Instrumentation Diagrams
PSB Plant Status Boards
PSI Process Safety Information
PSV Pressure Safety Valve
PTW Permit to Work
RBPS Risk Based Process Safety
SCTA Safety Critical Task Analysis
SH Shift Handover
SOP Standard Operating Procedure
SRK Skills, Rule and Knowledge
STAR Stop Think Act and Review
QRA Quantitative Risk Analysis
WI Work Instruction
UK United Kingdom
U.S. United States
Acknowledgements
The American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) and the Center for Chemical
Process Safety (CCPS) express their gratitude to all the members of the Human
Factors Handbook for Plant Operations Project Team and their member
companies for their generous efforts and technical contributions. The committee
structure for this concept book differs from other CCPS books in that this was a
project done in collaboration with the Energy Institute (EI) and the generous efforts
and technical contributions of the EI Technical Partner and Technical Company
members is also gratefully acknowledged.
The writers from the Human Factors consultancy Greenstreet Berman Ltd are
also acknowledged, especially the principal writers Michael Wright and Dr. Ludmila
Musalova, with additional inputs from David Pennie, Rebecca Canham and
Ninoslava Shah.
Gabriela Dutra (ex Braskem), Sahika Korkmaz (ex Chevron) and Josué Eduardo
Maia França (Petrobras) also contributed to certain stages of the project.
Before publication, all CCPS and EI books are subjected to a thorough peer
review process. CCPS and EI gratefully acknowledge the thoughtful comments and
suggestions of the peer reviewers. Their work enhanced the accuracy and clarity
of this concept book. The peer reviewers have provided many constructive
comments and suggestions. They were not asked to endorse this book and were
not shown the final manuscript before its release.
Peer Reviewers
Linda Bellamy White Queen BV
Michelle Brown FMC
Denise Chastain-Knight Exida
Palani Chidambaram DSS
Ed Corbett UK Health and Safety Executive
David Cummings DuPont
Rhona Flin Aberdeen University
Jerry Forest Celanese
Jeff Fox CCPS Emeritus, ex Dow
Osvaldo Fuente Dow
SP Garg GAIL
Zsuzsanna Gynes The Institution of Chemical Engineers
John Herber CCPS Emeritus
Alison Knight 3M
Susan Lee Marathon
Maria Chiara Leva TU Dublin
Keith Mayer Kraton Polymers
Rob Miles Hu-Tech
Chelsea Miller Chevron
Raphael Moura ANP
Cathy Pincus ExxonMobil
Tim Thompson Braskem
Elliot Wolf Chemours
Neal Yeomans Advansix
The affiliations of writers, project team members and peer reviewers were
correct at the time of publication.
Foreword
Humans are resourceful, resilient, innovative, smart creatures. They can also be
error-prone – forgetting to complete a step in a sequence, misunderstanding
instructions, making mistakes in task execution. Disentangling these strengths and
limitations, determining how and why human performance can be both resilient
and fragile is the science of human factors.
The military and aviation sectors were the first to appreciate that the design of
equipment and task environments had to take into account the psychological,
anatomical and physiological capabilities of the human operators. The influential
role of the organizational culture and its component systems on both managers
and workers also became apparent. As the hybrid blend of engineers,
psychologists, designers and other human factors specialists began to coalesce in
the late 1940s, professional human factors and ergonomics societies were formed,
helping to systematize an established body of evidence relating to human factors
science, with a range of accepted methods for investigation and intervention. But
it has taken some time for the value of this approach for the management of
workplace operations to be recognized across industrial sectors.
More than two decades later, at the time of this book’s publication, awareness
and understanding of the factors influencing human performance in the process
industries has become more active. This volume, one of a series directed by the
Center for Chemical Process Safety, reflects the increased activity in the process
industries. It provides an essential handbook for people on the frontline of plant
operations, helping them apply good human factors principles and knowledge
with practical techniques.
Practical tools and techniques are provided for each topic area with guidance
for application and more experienced practitioners will discover new ideas for
their portfolio of Human Factors methods.
Rhona Flin
Professor of Industrial Psychology
Aberdeen Business School
Robert Gordon University
Human Factors Handbook For Process Plant Operations: Improving Process Safety and System
Performance CCPS.
© 2022 CCPS. Published 2022 The American Institute of Chemical Engineers.
1 Introduction
Human Factors also provides a set of principles and concepts that can be used
to guide day-to-day decisions. The decisions focus on how best to support
successful human performance. This approach helps people to understand tasks
from the perspective of the person doing the work and provides ideas on how to
support people to perform better. It advocates an orientation (a way of thinking)
towards making improvements that support human performance and the
prevention of error. It recognizes people’s capabilities and commitment, and it
aims to maximize people’s roles in safe and productive operations, and to build
their ability to cope mentally and emotionally with stressful and demanding tasks,
i.e., psychological resilience.
Human Factors covers a very wide range of topics including, training, work
planning, and fatigue. Many of these topics come under existing management
systems, such as the operation of rotating shift schedule systems, and training
systems. Human Factors provides knowledge, tools, and insights that can be
integrated into an organization’s existing systems of work and operational
management, safety assessments, incident investigations, and day-to-day
operational decision-making. In this book, the terms ‘incident’ and ‘accident’ will be
used interchangeably.
The handbook:
This handbook can be read in conjunction with other CCPS guidance on safety
culture and process safety management, including:
Some of the elements within “Guidelines for Risk Based Process Safety” are
relevant to this handbook. Therefore, they have been referenced at various points
throughout the handbook as additional information where this would be helpful
to the reader.
• Frontline supervisors.
• Designers.
• Operations and maintenance managers.
• Plant superintendents.
• Process engineers.
• Project managers.
• Construction managers.
• Process safety and health and safety personnel with the role of coaching
higher-level managers on Human Factors aspects.
The handbook is intended for people who understand process operations and
have some process safety management experience.
The explanation of some topics has been intentionally simplified and phrased in
normal everyday language, rather than in scientific terms. This has been done in
order to make the document more accessible, readable and more usable in the
practical domain, and also with the aim of making it more understandable for an
international audience.
1. Introduction 7
For example, the term ‘mistake’ is used in this book to refer to both mistakes
and other kinds of error, even though human factors specialists commonly
understand the term ‘mistake’ to mean a specific kind of error that is to do with
judgement and decision-making, as distinct from other kinds of error such as ‘slips
and lapses’. The term 'mistake' is used generally in the book, but where specific
types of error are being discussed then the specific appropriate terms are used
where that aids clarity.
In those cases where obvious signs of poor Human Factors were found,
stakeholder confidence in the company was greatly reduced and employee morale
was destroyed.
The United States Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB)
investigation of the Texas City accident cited that previous accidents have shown
that Human Factors plays a role in industrial accidents [14]. The Texas City event
includes several examples of Human Factors. People had worked without rest for
many weeks or worked excessively long days. In some cases, it was known that
process instrumentation was unreliable or that critical information such as Piping
and Instrumentation Diagrams were out of date, and that training on new control
systems had not been provided.
Human Factors is more than common sense. People may make mistakes for many
reasons. Many factors influence how people perform. Process operations can be
complex and involve many difficult tasks. Technology is constantly changing.
8 Human Factors Handbook
In a dynamic process environment, with many complex tasks and safety critical
operations in flux, a high level of human performance needs to be achieved
systematically. Process safety does not depend on a single person’s view of what
is “common sense”. Recognized and implemented good practice and guidance is
necessary to achieve a high standard of human performance.
An overview of the handbook is given in Figure 1-2. The handbook is loosely split
into eight parts. Each Chapter can be read by itself. It is, however, useful to read
Chapters 2 to 4 first.
The other Chapters can be grouped into Parts around a set of core topics, such
as Part 2 job aids, Part 3 equipment design, Part 4 competence, Part 5 task support,
Part 6 non-technical skills and Part 7 covering working with contractors and
managing change.
Non-technical skills
Procedures and job aids Operational competence Task support
20. Situation awareness and
5. Human performance 10. Human performance and 15. Fatigue and staffing levels
agile thinking
and job aids operational competency 16. Task planning and error
21. Fostering situation
6. Selecting a type of job 11. Determining operational assessment
awareness and agile
aid competency requirements 17. Error management in task
thinking
7. Developing content of 12. Identifying learning planning, preparation, and
22. Human Factors in
a job aid requirements control
emergencies
8. Format and design of 13. Operational competency 18. Capturing, challenging,
job aids development and correcting operational
14. Operational competency error
assessment 19. Communicating
information and
instructions
9. Human Factors in
Equipment design
This chapter provides some Human Factors principles that will help people to
reduce the likelihood of errors and mistakes. By the end of this chapter, the reader
should be able to:
The “Miracle on the Hudson” happened on January 15, 2009, when a bird strike
occurred shortly after US Airways flight 1549 took off from New York’s LaGuardia
airport [15]. The Airbus struck a flock of Canada geese while on the climb from the
airport. The Captain, Chesley Sullenberger, and First Officer Jeff Skiles decided to
ditch (emergency water landing) the aircraft in the Hudson River, saving all on
board. This famous event was portrayed in a 2016 film (Sully) starring Tom Hanks
as Chesley “Sully” Sullenberger. The successful ditching of an unpowered
passenger airline onto the Hudson River, within six minutes of the bird strike, when
both engines had failed, is an example of skilled and knowledgeable human
performance.
Following the bird strike, a very short period of time was available for the pilots
to determine what had happened, enact a Mayday, determine they could not
return to the airport, decide they had to glide around and find an alternative
landing site (the Hudson River), and identify a new course. They achieved this and
ditched on the Hudson River, after which the 150 passengers and five crew were
rescued by nearby boats and ferries.
The normal procedure for dual engine failure was to attempt to return to the
airport. This turn back to the airport was not possible at the plane’s low altitude. It
was also not possible to complete a “dual engine failure” checklist due to the
limited time available prior to ditching. Simulator training did not cover ditching.
12 Human Factors Handbook
The Captain and First Officer needed to make decisions quickly based on their
knowledge and judgment.
2.2.2 How did they perform successfully?
Despite the popular title of “Miracle on the Hudson”, the successful unpowered
ditching did not happen by luck.
First, airline pilots receive a high level of training in piloting, annual simulator-
based training in handling emergencies, and training in Crew Resource
Management (CRM). CRM provides training in understanding human performance,
interpersonal skills, communications, leadership and decision-making. This
includes maintaining situation awareness and making decisions in high stress
emergencies. The National Transportation Safety Board investigation report
(NTSB, 2010) [15] stated:
“The captain credited the US Airways CRM training for providing him and the
first officer with the skills and tools that they needed to build a team quickly and
open lines of communication, share common goals, and work together.” (p61)
Second, the plane’s “fly by wire” design meant that after the pilot changed
course, the computers adjusted the flight control to maintain plane stability. This
allowed the crew to focus on emergency decision-making. The system design
reduced the crew workload.
Third, having two pilots also allowed them to multi-task as a team and to check
each other’s judgments and actions.
2. Human performance and error 13
The “Miracle on the Hudson” shows that with training and experience, people
are able to carry out complex tasks reliably and accurately. With education on how
a system works, people can use their knowledge and experience to quickly come
up with ways to handle new situations. Training in decision-making helps people
make better judgments and decisions, and to act quickly. While the application of
a Human Factors approach can prevent many errors and mistakes, it should
greatly improve human performance and reduce the potential for unrecoverable
errors.
In 2005, a major explosion occurred at the BP refinery in Texas City, United States
of America. A summary of the accident is given in B.1 (page 383) and the ‘The B.P.
U.S. Refineries Independent Safety Review Panel’ provides a very detailed report
of this accident [16].
The CSB [14] 2007 investigation report stated people were “set up to fail”. Some
points from the CSB investigation which highlight Human Factors issues include:
There were many factors influencing the operational decisions and actions.
Deficiencies in each of these factors combined to exacerbate operational
problems.
“You cannot change the human condition, but you can change the conditions in
which people work.” Professor James Reason (Chapter 7, page 96) [17].
A Human Factors principle is that it is vital to ask how and why errors occur.
This includes asking:
Environment-
related
• Temperature,
humidity,
ventilation
• Noise
Person-related • Lighting Equipment-
• Attitudes & • Space related
behaviors
• Layout
• Training &
• Fit for purpose
experience
• Accessibility
• Capabilities
• Complexity
• Relationships
Performance
influencing factors
Information-
related
Job-related
• Clarity
• Fatigue
• Information
overload • Organizational
Task-related stressors
• Accuracy
• Situational stressors • Workload
• Completeness
• Availability • Distractions
• Multi-tasking
• Complexity
• Time available
• Task frequency/
duration
• Workload
2. Human performance and error 17
This Chapter provides some key principles for identifying options to support
human performance. The later Chapters provide advice on these options.
In order to support human performance and reduce the potential for errors
and mistakes, it is important to understand the nature of the tasks, the type of
human performance required, and the causes of possible error and mistakes.
The Skill, Rule and Knowledge-based model (SRK) is a commonly used way of
thinking about how people perform. The idea is that people perform differently
according to the type of task they are doing and their familiarity with the task. The
SRK performance model is shown in Figure 3-1.
This model has been used since the 1980’s to help identify ways to support
people in performing process operations tasks. It was originally proposed by
Professor Jens Rasmussen [18] and further developed by other researchers such
as Professor James Reason [19].
Rule based tasks tend to require following a procedure, assessing the situation
(situation awareness), decision-making, and experience related to carrying out the
procedure. An example is identifying a fault in a car engine that is explained in a
manual.
20 Human Factors Handbook
The words “rule” and “procedure” are not meant to be used literally. A written
procedure may not exist. These words are used to mean the right set of actions
are known in advance of performing a task and it has been determined when these
actions should be performed.
Skill-based performance means people can reliably and quickly perform tasks
with a low level of conscious mental effort, as the actions are so well practiced they
do not require much thought. Steering a car is a typical example. This may also
include being able to gather and understand information very quickly, such as
reading process instrumentation.
• Quickly carrying out control actions, without using much thought, such as
operating the controls, would use a skill-based performance.
Different tasks will require different levels of each type of performance ability.
Table 3-1 provides definitions and examples.
Different types of errors or mistakes are linked to the three types of human
performance discussed in 3.2.
Lapses of attention occur when a person This may happen when someone
loses their place in a series of actions (for incorrectly interprets what is
example, steps in a procedure), skipping a happening or selects a wrong
step due to a distraction or a gap in course of action.
memory. The intention is correct and the
knowledge may be right, but one or more
steps are missed.
Table 3-1: SRK types of human performance
Type of human
Definition Examples
performance
Knowledge- When a task is new or complicated, a person will need to • Diagnosing a process upset
based task pay a lot of attention to what they are doing and decide • Working out how to perform a rare
performance what to do based on general knowledge and experience. maintenance task
When a person can perform a task to a high level of • Pressing an accelerator pedal to maintain
Skill-based
accuracy and reliability with a low level of attention, the steady speed of a chemical road tanker
performance
performance is based on skill. • Applying the right amount of torque to a bolt
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
stay with it till it quits. If yu’ happen to wish to
speak to me about that pistol or bears, yu’
come around to Smith’s Palace—that’s the
boss hotel here, ain’t it?—and if yu’ don’t come
too late I’ll not be gone to bed. By this time of
night I’m liable to get sleepy. Tell your friends
good-bye for me, and be good to yourself. I’ve
appreciated your company.”
Mr. McLean entered Smith’s Palace, and,
engaging a room with two beds in it, did a
little delicate lying by means of the truth. “It’s
a lost boy—a runaway,” he told the clerk.
“He’ll not be extra clean, I expect, if he does come. Maybe he’ll give
me the slip, and I’ll have a job cut out to-morrow. I’ll thank yu’ to put
my money in your safe.”
The clerk placed himself at the disposal of
the secret service, and Lin walked up and
down, looking at the railroad photographs for
some ten minutes, when Master Billy peered
in from the street.
“Hello!” said Mr. McLean, casually, and
returned to a fine picture of Pike’s Peak.
Billy observed him for a space, and,
receiving no further attention, came stepping
along. “I’m not a-going back to Laramie,” he
stated, warningly.
“I wouldn’t,” said Lin. “It ain’t half the town
Denver is. Well, good-night. Sorry yu’ couldn’t call sooner—I’m dead
sleepy.”
“O-h!” Billy stood blank. “I wish I’d shook the darned old show.
Say, lemme black your boots in the morning?”
“Not sure my train don’t go too early.”
“I’m up! I’m up! I get around to all of ’em.”
“Where do yu’ sleep?”
“Sleeping with the engine-man now. Why can’t you put that on me
to-night?”
“Goin’ up-stairs. This gentleman wouldn’t
let yu’ go up-stairs.”
But the earnestly petitioned clerk
consented, and Billy was the first to hasten
into the room. He stood rapturous while Lin
buckled the belt round his scanty stomach,
and ingeniously buttoned the suspenders
outside the accoutrement to retard its
immediate descent to earth.
“Did it ever kill a man?” asked Billy,
touching the six-shooter.
“No. It ’ain’t never
had to do that, but I
expect maybe it’s stopped some killin’ me.”
“Oh, leave me wear it just a minute! Do you
collect arrow-heads? I think they’re bully.
There’s the finest one you ever seen.” He
brought out the relic, tightly wrapped in
paper, several pieces. “I foun’ it myself,
camping with father. It was sticking in a crack
right on top of a rock, but nobody’d seen it till
I came along. Ain’t it fine?”
Mr. McLean pronounced it a gem.
“Father an’ me found a lot, an’ they made mother mad lying
around, an’ she throwed ’em out. She takes stuff from Kelley’s.”
“Who’s Kelley?”
“He keeps the drug-store at Laramie. Mother gets awful funny.
That’s how she was when I came home. For I told Mr. Perkins he
lied, an’ I ran then. An’ I knowed well enough she’d lick me when she
got through her spell—an’ father can’t stop her, an’ I—ah, I was sick
of it! She’s lamed me up twice beating me—an’ Perkins wanting me
to say ‘God bless my mother!’ a-getting up and a-going to bed—he’s a
flubdub! An’ so I cleared out. But I’d just as leaves said for God to
bless father—an’ you. I’ll do it now if you say it’s any sense.”
Mr. McLean sat down in a chair. “Don’t yu’ do it now,” said he.
“You wouldn’t like mother,” Billy continued. “You can keep that.”
He came to Lin and placed the arrow-head in his hands, standing
beside him. “Do you
like birds’ eggs? I
collect them. I got
twenty-five kinds—
sage-hen, an’ blue
grouse, an’ willow-
grouse, an’ lots more
kinds harder—but I
couldn’t bring all them
from Laramie. I
brought the magpie’s,
though. D’you care to
see a magpie egg? Well,
you stay to-morrow an’ I’ll show you that an’ some other things I got
the engine-man lets me keep there, for there’s boys that would steal
an egg. An’ I could take you where we could fire that pistol. Bet you
don’t know what that is!”
He brought out a small tin box shaped like a thimble, in which
were things that rattled.
Mr. McLean gave it up.
“That’s kinni-kinnic seed. You can have that, for I got some more
with the engine-man.”
Lin received this
second token also, and
thanked the giver for it.
His first feeling had
been to prevent the
boy’s parting with his
treasures, but
something that came
not from the polish of
manners and
experience made him
know that he should
take them. Billy talked away, laying bare his little soul; the street boy
that was not quite come made place for the child that was not quite
gone, and unimportant words and confidences dropped from him
disjointed as he climbed to the knee of Mr. McLean, and
inadvertently took that cow-puncher for some sort of parent he had
not hitherto met. It lasted but a short while, however, for he went to
sleep in the middle of a sentence, with his head upon Lin’s breast.
The man held him perfectly still, because he had not the faintest
notion that Billy would be impossible to disturb. At length he spoke
to him, suggesting that bed might prove more comfortable; and,
finding how it was, rose and undressed the boy and laid him between
the sheets. The arms and legs seemed aware of the moves required of
them, and stirred conveniently; and directly the head was upon the
pillow the whole small frame burrowed down, without the opening of
an eye or a change in the breathing. Lin stood some time by the
bedside, with his eyes on the long, curling lashes and the curly hair.
Then he glanced craftily at the door of the room, and at himself in
the looking-glass. He stooped and kissed Billy on the forehead, and,
rising from that, gave himself a hangdog stare in the mirror, and
soon in his own bed was sleeping the sound sleep of health.
V
Santa Claus Lin
This tune was more beautiful than all, and Lin lost himself in it, until
he found Billy recalling him with a finger upon the words, the
concluding ones:
The music rose and descended to its lovely and simple end; and, for a
second time in Denver, Lin brushed a hand across his eyes. He
turned his face from his neighbor, frowning crossly; and since the
heart has reasons which Reason does not know, he seemed to himself
a fool; but when the service was over and he came out, he repeated
again, “‘Peace and good-will.’ When I run on to the Bishop of
Wyoming I’ll tell him if he’ll preach on them words I’ll be there.”
“Couldn’t we shoot your pistol now?” asked Billy.
“Sure, boy. Ain’t yu’ hungry, though?”
“No. I wish we were away off up there. Don’t you?”
“The mountains? They look pretty—so white! A heap better ’n
houses. Why, we’ll go there! There’s trains to Golden. We’ll shoot
around among the foot-hills.”
To Golden they immediately went, and, after a meal there,
wandered in the open country until the cartridges were gone, the sun
was low, and Billy was walked off his young heels—a truth he learned
complete in one horrid moment and battled to
conceal.
“Lame!” he echoed, angrily. “I ain’t.”
“Shucks!” said Lin, after the next ten steps.
“You are, and both feet.”
“Tell you, there’s stones here, an’ I’m just a-
skipping them.”
Lin, briefly, took the
boy in his arms and
carried him to Golden.
“I’m played out
myself,” he said, sitting
in the hotel and looking lugubriously at Billy
on a bed. “And I ain’t fit to have charge of a
hog.” He came and put his hand on the boy’s
head.
“I’m not sick,” said the cripple. “I tell you
I’m bully. You wait an’ see me eat dinner.”
But Lin had hot water and cold water and
salt, and was an hour upon his knees bathing the hot feet. And then
Billy could not eat dinner.
There was a doctor in Golden; but in spite of his light prescription
and most reasonable observations, Mr. McLean passed a foolish
night of vigil, while Billy slept, quite well at first, and, as the hours
passed, better and better. In the morning he was entirely brisk,
though stiff.
“I couldn’t work quick to-day,” he said. “But I guess one day won’t
lose me my trade.”
“How d’ yu’ mean?” asked Lin.
“Why, I’ve got regulars, you know. Sidney Ellis an’ Pete Goode has
theirs, an’ we don’t cut each other. I’ve got Mr. Daniels an’ Mr. Fisher
an’ lots, an’ if you lived in Denver I’d shine your boots every day for
nothing. I wished you lived in Denver.”
“Shine my boots? Yu’ll never! And yu’ don’t black Daniels or
Fisher, or any of the outfit.”
“Why, I’m doing first-rate,” said Billy,
surprised at the swearing into which Mr.
McLean now burst. “An’ I ain’t big enough to
get to make money at any other job.
“I want to see that
engine-man,” muttered
Lin. “I don’t like your
smokin’ friend.”
“Pete Goode? Why,
he’s awful smart. Don’t
you think he’s smart?”
“Smart’s nothin’,” observed Mr. McLean.
“Pete has learned me and Sidney a lot,”
pursued Billy, engagingly.
“I’ll bet he has!” growled the cow-puncher;
and again Billy was taken aback at his
language.
THE END
TRANSCRIBER’S NOTES
1. Silently corrected obvious typographical errors and
variations in spelling.
2. Retained archaic, non-standard, and uncertain spellings
as printed.
*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK A JOURNEY IN
SEARCH OF CHRISTMAS ***
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside
the United States, check the laws of your country in addition to
the terms of this agreement before downloading, copying,
displaying, performing, distributing or creating derivative works
based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The
Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright
status of any work in any country other than the United States.