Professional Documents
Culture Documents
What Is International Commercial Arbitration
What Is International Commercial Arbitration
What Is International Commercial Arbitration
International Arbitration – is an arbitration where the parties to an arbitration agreement have, at the
time of the conclusion of that agreement, there places of business in different state or one of the
following places is situated outside the Philippines in which the parties have there places of business
wherein-
For the purpose of international arbitration, the NEW YORK CONVENTION is the United Nations
Convention on the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral Awards approve in 1958 and ratified
by the Philippine senate under Senate Resolution NO. 71. The following are important terms to
consider:
Non-Convention Award means a foreign arbitral award made in a state, which is not a
convention state.
Non-Convention State means a state that is not a member of the New York Convention
Appointing Authority as used in the model law shall mean the person or institution named in
the arbitration agreement as the appointing authority; or the regular arbitration institution
under whose rules the arbitration is agreed to be conducted.
Arbitral Tribunal (under the model Law) means the sole arbitrator or a panel of arbitrators.
Commercial Arbitration means an arbitration that covers matters arising from all relationships
of a commercial nature, whether contractual or not. Relationships of a commercial nature
include, but are not limited to any trade transaction for the supply or exchange of goods and
services; distribution agreement; construction of works; commercial representation or agency;
factory; leasing; consulting; engineering; licensing; investment; financing; banking; insurance;
joint venture and other form of industrial or business cooperation; carriage of goods or
passengers by air, sea, rail, or road.
Convention award means of foreign arbitral award made in convention state.
Court (under the model law) means a body of organ of the judicial system of the phil. (i.e., the
Regional Trial Court, Court of Appeals and Supreme Court).
The Office of ADR is an agency attached to the Department of Justice which shall be headed by an
Executive Director, who shall be appointed of the President of the Philippines, taking into consideration
the recommendation of the Secretary of Justice.
Powers of ADR
Functions of OADR
To promote, develop, and expand…
To monitor, study and evaluate…
To recommend to congress…
To make studies on and provide linkage for development…
To compile and publish a list or roster of ADR providers/practitioners…
To compile a list or roster of foreign or international ADR providers/pratitiners.
Divisions of ADR
The OADR has ff. staff and service divisions:
Secretariat which shall provide necessary support and discharge such other functions
and duties as many be directed by the Executive Director.
Public Information and Promotion Division which shall be charged with the
dissemination of information, the promotion of the importance and public acceptance f
mediation, conciliation, arbitration or any combination thereof and other ADR forms as a
means of achieving speedy and efficient means of resolving all disputes and to help in
the promotion, development and expansion of the use of ADR.
Training Division which shall be charge the formulation of effective standards
Records and Library Division which shall be charged with the establishment and
maintenance of a central repository of ADR laws, rules and regulations and etc.
Mediation profession
Arbitration profession
ADR organization
IBP
Academe
o Selection of a Mediator
The parties have the freedom to select their mediator. The parties may request
the OADR to provide them with the list or roster or the resumes of its certified
mediators. The OADR may be requested to inform the mediator of his/her
selection.
o Replacement of Mediator
If the mediator selected is unable to act as such for any reason, the parties may,
upon being informed of such fact, select another mediator.
o Refusal or Withdrawal of Mediator
A mediator may refuse from acting to such, withdraw or may be compelled to
withdraw, from the mediation proceedings under the following circumstances.
If any of the parties so requests the mediator to withdraw.
The mediator does not have the qualifications, training and experience
to enable him/her to meet the reasonable expectations of the parties.
Where the mediator’s impartiality is in question.
If continuation if the process would violate any ethical standards.
If the safety of any of the parties would be jeopardized.
If the mediator is unable to provide effective services.
Incase of conflict of interest.
In any of the following instances, if the mediator is satisfied that:
a. One or more of the parties is/are not acting in good faith;
b. the parties agreement would be illegal or involve the commission of
a crime;
c. continuing the dispute resolution would give rise to an appearance
impropriety;
d. continuing with the process would cause significant harm to a
nonparticipating person or to the public, or;
e. continuing discussions would not be in the best interests of the
parties, their minor children or the dispute resolution process.