Professional Documents
Culture Documents
G.V. Florida Transport Inc. vs. Heirs of Battung Jr.
G.V. Florida Transport Inc. vs. Heirs of Battung Jr.
Facts:
The case involves a dispute over the liability of a common
carrier for damages arising from the death of a passenger
caused by a co-passenger.
The respondent, Romeo L. Battung, Jr., boarded the
petitioner's bus bound for Manila.
During the trip, a man seated at the fourth row of the bus shot
Battung in the head and fled the scene.
Battung was pronounced dead upon arrival at the hospital.
The heirs of Battung filed a complaint for damages against the
petitioner, alleging that the petitioner and its employees failed
to exercise extraordinary diligence in ensuring the safety of
passengers.
The Regional Trial Court (RTC) ruled in favor of the
respondents and held the petitioner, along with its employees,
jointly and severally liable for damages.
The Court of Appeals (CA) affirmed the RTC's decision.
Issue:
Whether or not the petitioner is liable for damages arising from
culpa contractual.
Ruling:
The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the petitioner.
Ratio:
The Court emphasized that common carriers are not insurers
of the absolute safety of their passengers and that their
liability for personal injuries rests upon their negligence.
In this case, the death of Battung was caused by a co-
passenger and not due to any defect in the means of transport
or the negligence of the petitioner's employees.
Therefore, the petitioner cannot be held liable for damages.
The Court also clarified that the duty of a common carrier to
ensure the safety of its passengers should be balanced with
the passengers' right to privacy.
Common carriers should be given leeway in assuming that
passengers will not bring anything dangerous on board unless
there is evidence to the contrary.