Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Conceptpaper Zablan
Conceptpaper Zablan
Anxiety.
Cooperative learning is a type of teaching. It means that two or more learners become a
learning unit. Through the interaction of group members and the sharing of responsibilities, learners can
achieve common learning goal. In this process, each learner must take responsibility for team members.
This kind of teaching is learner-centered and can provide students with opportunities for active
thinking and more interactive communication. Cooperative learning is a learning activity that establishes a
common goal between group members, who then work together toward this, cooperate and support one
another. Through the cooperation of peers, the effectiveness of individual learning is improved, and group
goals can be achieved. For learning to be fully cooperative, it needs to have the following three key
interaction. Cooperative learning is a structured and systematic teaching strategy, which is less subject to
the restrictions of subjects and grades. Teachers can help meet the needs of students of different genders,
abilities, socioeconomic backgrounds, races, etc. After getting into groups, the whole group establishes a
common goal. All group members are responsible for themselves and for the others. They encourage and
assist one another in order to achieve the learning goals. Teachers arrange suitable cooperative
learning situations and group students in a heterogeneous manner, providing guidance to students to
help them cooperate, learn from one another, share resources and achieve learning goals together,
which not only contributes to learning achievement but also to motivation levels. Cooperative learning is
a systematic and structured teaching strategy, which supports learning outcomes and also students’
communication and social skills (Chettaoui et al., 2020; Chen et al., 2021d,e).
Cooperative learning can be considered as an umbrella term for a number of classroom practices. Slavin
(1985: 6) argued that ‘cooperative learning methods are structured, systematic instructional strategies’,
while Johnson and Johnson (1999: 72) held that they are ‘the instructional use of small groups so that
students work together to maximise their own and each other’s learning’. Despite the classification of a
number of instructional approaches that fit under the term ‘cooperative learning (Schmuck, 1985; Slavin,
1985), this family of approaches has been predominantly influenced by social psychological research and
theory. Slavin (1985: 7) posited that the ‘engine’ that powers cooperative learning is always the same, i.e.
heterogeneous groups working together to reach common goals. That said, he concluded that the methods
of actual cooperative learning differ in almost every other way. This diversity occurs, according to Slavin
(1985), because all cooperative learning methods are adapted in different ways when they (a) are used to
meet the intended practical requirements of the classroom and (b) are manipulated to solve the problems
introduced by cooperative learning itself (i.e. maintaining the individual’s accountability while working
towards a group’s goal). Given the mixed heritage of cooperative learning, and the interchangeable use of
terms like ‘method’, ‘instructional’ and ‘learning’, it is important to consider the model’s epistemological
One of the most important human traits for achieving goals is self-esteem (Doodman, Zadeh,& Changizi,
2017), because self-esteem is related to performance (Nyarko, 2017) and student success (Duraku &
Hoxha, 2018). So that in communicating and interacting, the teacher needs to protect the human rights that
students have by not applying punishment during the disciplinary process and so on. Physical and social
punishment that teachers implement will only increase aggression, antisocial behaviour, low relationship
quality, depression, and lack of more internalization of students (Smith, 2006).Teachers should appreciate
students’ effort and offer various solutions if students do not complete their tasks not to punish and
intimidate students with verbal and physical violence that makes them feel unworthy in front of others.
Whether the teacher is aware or not, every social interaction is related to student self-esteem (Widodo
&Pratitis, 2013). When teachers respond to students’ work with negative feedback or verbal abuse, it will
break the development of self-esteem, emotional well-being, and physical condition of students (Noh &
Tallat, 2012). The reason is that this feedback is a form of “legitimization” that students are not better than
their classmates. When teachers or classmates bully each other, there has been an invasion of privacy that
can damage the psycho-social development of students in learning even its culmination can trigger tension
Socially anxious students miss out on learning opportunities by avoiding interaction, physically or
anxieties, while the ability to monitor and modify communication with colleagues and tutors may be
distorted by fears of negative evaluation. But although it is distressing and causes disengagement
from learning, there is limited objective evidence about the impact of social anxiety on academic
performance in education. Studies have reported significant effects of social anxiety on failure to
complete school, increased risk of exam failure, failure to graduate and reduced income. When
participating in a seminar or presentation, socially anxious students judge their competence poorly,
in contrast to the more positive evaluations of observers; the threat of negative social evaluation
becomes progressively more challenging, and anxieties rise where assessment includes performance
or presentation. Students are encouraged to make use of peer and tutor support; class interaction
increases amongst those students who are socially confident. Thus, for those who are socially
anxious, there is a growing conflict between their need to engage with the programme and with
colleagues, and their fears of exposure and embarrassment. This approach-avoidance conflict has
been reported by several researchers and is an important dynamic to appreciate in working with socially
Physical education can be a context in which students are ‘educated through the physical’, which includes
the possibility to learn social inclusion as an important life skill and contributor to the greater good of
society. A key goal in the Norwegian educational system is that such positive life skills become internalised
in students. This study showed that students may have experiences of socially exclusive behaviour as
performed by others, but they do not necessarily act to reduce this behaviour. On the contrary, they might
unknowingly facilitate it by giving positive feedback if it leads to a successful outcome (e.g. scoring goals).
Although students might dislike socially exclusive behaviour, they may act in a socially exclusive manner
themselves. This indicates the need for teachers to observe and analyse social inclusion in team activities
to elucidate students’ implicit goals in the activity, and together with the students’ experiences in the
activity, to discuss and agree upon a common explicit goal. We conclude by suggesting that the five
social skills, and group processing) provide a useful reflective framework for teachers to address a variety
of issues; for example, are students individually responsible for passing the ball to others? Are students
asking their peers to contribute? Furthermore, the learning of social inclusion must take place throughout
the team activity and be based on the students’ experiences, as argued by Dewey, and as shown by our
One of the obstacles that the students with Social Anxiety is facing is the subject Physical Education,
because in this subject it is natural that all of the activities are made with collaboration with other students.
Physical Educations is a subject where students educated physically that includes a highly possibly to
interact with other people. One of the problem that this research can encounter is how to overcome the
student’s anxiety by collaborating with other people especially co-student for them to learn more effectively.
But what if a person with social anxiety chose not to cooperate and collaborate with the people in their
environment? What can be the possible solution for them to learn especially in Physical Education where
teamwork and cooperation is one of the most needed? What if we made them cooperate with other people
but it make a bigger problem like their social anxiety became worsen? This are the gaps that can
This study will help the readers especially the people experiencing and suffering from social anxiety by
knowing what can be the possible solution for them to overcome their social anxiety. It can also help the
readers who has a family member, friend or someone who is suffering from Social Anxiety through knowing
what can be the possible thing to do when they are with them when they are experiencing it. It can also
help the teachers especially in Physical Education to decide what they can do to persuade their students
with social anxiety to cooperate with their classmates, and also for them to give advice to the classmates of
the person with social anxiety on how to address their classmate that is suffering from this.
REFERENCE
https://www.academia.edu/44539791/Social_Anxiety_in_People_with_Learning_Difficulties
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1356336X20904075
Inger Beate Larsen (2021) Students’ experiences and learning of social inclusion in team activities in
physical education.
https://www.academia.edu/56500483/
Students_experiences_and_learning_of_social_inclusion_in_team_activities_in_physical_education
https://www.academia.edu/50987850/
OPTIMIZATION_OF_SOCIAL_SUPPORT_IN_PHYSICAL_EDUCATION_LEARNING_TO_STRENGTHEN
_STUDENTS_SOCIAL_SELF_ESTEEM
Chia-Chen Chen (2021) The Efficiency of Cooperative Learning in Physical Education on the Learning of
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.717528/full#refer1
Topic: Collaborating Social Media in Education
BPED32