Quashing PDF

IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CRL. M.C. OF 2023
IN THE MATTER OF:
RAM CHANDER SHARMA & ORS. ….PETITIONERS
VERSUS
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. …RESPONDENTS
INDEX
SR. NO. PARTICULARS PAGE NO.

1 Notice of Motion 1
2 Court Fees 2
3 Urgent Application 3
4 Memo of Parties 4-6
5 Certificate 7
6 List of Dates and Events 8-9
7 Petition under section 482 of Cr.P.C. for
quashing the F.I.R. No.: 97/2016, P.S.: Civil 10-17
Lines, Allahabad (Prayagraj), Uttar Pradesh
8 Affidavit in support. 18-27

9 Application for exemption u/s 482 Cr.P.C
from filing the certified and typed copy of 28-29
the annexures.
10 Affidavit in support 30-39

11 ANNEXURE A (COLLY.)
True copy of F.I.R. along with its true typed 40-52
translated copy.
12 ANNEXURE B
True Copy of the Mediation Settlement, 53-74
Samadhan Delhi High Court dated
09.10.2023
13 ANNEXURE C
Mediation Settlement Affidavit of 75-76
Affidavit of Respondent no. 3
Respondent no. 3
14 ANNEXURE D
E (COLLY.)
ID proof of all the parties along with 77-83
photograph.
15 Vakalatnama 84-88
16 Proof of Service 89
Drawn and filed by:
NIHIT DALMIA & JEEVESH MEHTA

PLACE: NEW DELHI ADVOCATES
DATED: 12.10.2023 Maven Legal LLP- Advocates & Consultants
Office: 1688, GF, Outram Lane, Delhi 09
Phone: 9350720673
Email: advnihitdalmia@gmail.com
NOTE- That the F.I.R. No. 97/2016, Police Station Civil Lines, Allahabad
and all proceedings emanating out of it were transferred to the
courts of Delhi vide order dated 18.07.2017 passed by the Hon’ble
Supreme Court of India and the said proceedings were registered
before Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Tis Hazari Courts asCriminal
Case no. 8311 of 2020 title State Vs Ram Chander Sharma & Others I
Untertake to File Dim Annexures and Documents Directed by Hon'ble
Court File it same Kindly list the matter as it is on 16.10.2023
1
CRL. M.C. OF 2023
IN THE MATTER OF:
VERSUS
NOTICE OF MOTION
Sir,
Kindly find the enclosed copy of the Petition being filed in the Hon’ble
High Court of Delhi that is likely to be listed before the Hon’ble Court
16.10.2023 This is for your information and record. Please take

on __________.
notice accordingly.
Thanking You
Drawn and filed by:

Phone: 9350720673
10/13/23, 12:59 PM PrintWindow
:: Online Payment Acknowledgement
Online Reference No DLOCF10359207652861023125826

2
Location DELHI
Court Fee UIN DLCT1344J2359M458
Payment Mode UPI
Amount 30
Bank Name ayush24thakur@okaxis
Payment Reference pay_Mnbp0LPUAgDtDf
Payment Status Transaction Success
Th i s i s n o t a C o u r t Fe e R e ce i p t, i t i s j u st a Pa ym e n t Ackn o w l e d g e m e n t.
This is a system generated receipt.
1/1
3
CRL. M.C. OF 2023
IN THE MATTER OF:
VERSUS
URGENT APPLICATION
TO
THE REGISTRAR
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
NEW DELHI
SUB: URGENT PETITION
SIR,
Would you kindly be pleased to treat the accompanying petition as an
urgent one as per the rules and procedure of the Hon’ble High Court
of Delhi. The grounds of urgency are:
“That the matter has been amicably settled between

the parties and quashing of the F.I.R. is prayed for”
Drawn and filed by:

Phone: 9350720673
4
CRL. M.C. OF 2023
IN THE MATTER OF:
VERSUS
F.I.R. No.: 97/2016
U/S: 498A/420/406/313/504/506 IPC &

3/4 DOWRY PROTECT ACT
P.S.: CIVIL LINE, ALLAHABAD (NOW PRAYAGRAJ)
MEMO OF PARTIES
1. SH. RAM CHAND SHAMRA (FATHER-IN-LAW)

S/O LT. SH. BRAHM DATT
AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS
R/O VILLAGE REHLU, P.S.: SHAHPUR,
DIST. KANGRA, HIMACHAL PRADESH
2. SMT. PREM LATA SHARMA (MOTHER-IN-LAW)

W/O SH. RAM CHAND SHARMA
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS
3. MR. CHANDAN SHARMA (HUSBAND)

S/O SH. RAM CHAND SHARMA
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
R/O 86, BRIGHTSIDE AVENUE,
STAINES-OPON-THAMES, TW181NQ,
UNITED KINGDOM
THROUGH ATTORNEY SH. RAM CHAND SHARMA
4. MR. RAJAN SHARMA (BROTHER-IN-LAW/JAITH)

S/O SH. RAM CHAND SHARMA
5
AGED ABOUT YEARS
5. MRS. ARPNA SHARMA (SISTER-IN-LAW/JAITHANI)

W/O MR. RAJAN SHARMA
AGED ABOUT YEARS
DIST. KANGRA, HIMACHAL PRADESH …PETITIONERS
VERSUS
1. THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

Through SHO P.S.: CIVIL LINE, ALLAHABAD (NOW PRAYAGRAJ)
2. SH. SATYA PRAKASH (FATHER OF WIFE)
S/O LT. SH. BASANT SINGH,
R/O 50/2, LOHIYA MARG,
P.S.: CIVIL LINES, DIST.: ALLAHABAD (PRAYAGRAJ)
UTTAR PRADESH,
3. MS. APRAJITA TRIPATHI (WIFE)

D/O SH. SATYA PRAKASH,
R/O 50/2, LOHIYA MARG,
P.S.: CIVIL LINES, DIST.: ALLAHABAD (PRAYAGRAJ)
UTTAR PRADESH,
THROUGH SPA HOLDER SH. SATYA PRAKASH …RESPONDENTS
PETITION UNDER SECTION 482 OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE
SEEKING TO INVOKE THE INHERENT POWERS OF THE HON’BLE
HIGH COURT AND PRAYING INTER ALIA FOR QUASHING OF THE
F.I.R. No. 97/2016, P.S.: CIVIL LINES, ALLAHABAD (NOW
PRAYAGRAJ) UTTAR PRADESH, U/S: 498A/420/406/313/504/506

6
IPC & 3/4 DOWRY PROTECT ACT AND THE CONSEQUENTIAL
PROCEEDINGS/INVESTIGATION ARISING OUT OF THE SAID F.I.R.
Drawn and filed by:

Phone: 9350720673
7
CRL. M.C. OF 2023
IN THE MATTER OF:
VERSUS
CERTIFICATE
It is certified that all the annexures are the true translated of the
original. That nothing has been added or subtracted during
translation or typing.
Drawn and filed by:

DATED: 12.10 .2023 Maven Legal LLP- Advocates & Consultants
Phone: 9350720673
8
CRL. M.C. OF 2023
IN THE MATTER OF:
VERSUS
LIST OF DATES AND EVENTS
DATES EVENTS
28.06.2012 Marriage between Respondent no. 3 and Petitioner
no. 3 was solemnised
18.02.2016 Respondent no. 2 got registered F.I.R. No 97/2016
dated 18.02.2016 under Section 498A, 323, 504,
313, 406, 420 506 IPC and Section 3/4 Dowry
Prohibition Act, 1961 at Police Station Civil Lines,
Allahabad against the Petitioners
03.06.2016 Marriage between Petitioner no. 3 and Respondent
no. 3 was dissolved vide judgment and decree passed
by the Family Court at Bury St. Edmunds in
BV15D16530 titled as Chandan Sharma Vs. Aprajita
Tripathi
18.07.2017 F.I.R. No. 97/2016, Police Station Civil Lines,
Allahabad and all proceedings emanating out of it
were transferred to the courts of Delhi vide order
passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India and
the said proceedings were registered before Chief
Metropolitan Magistrate, Tis Hazari Courts as
Criminal Case no. 8311 of 2020 title State Vs Ram
Chander Sharma & Others
9
07.05.2019 Marriage between Petitioner no. 3 and Respondent
no. 3 was dissolved vide judgment and decree
passed by the Hon’ble Court of the Addl. Principle
Judge, Family Court, Allahabad in HMA No.
718/2016 titled as Mrs. Aprajita Tripathi Vs. Mr.
Chandan Sharma
25.05.2019 Petitioner no. 1 and no. 2 have been charged for
offence under section 406,420,34 IPC and the
Petitioner no. 3 and no. 4 have been discharged by
the Ld. Trial Court, Central, Tis Hazari Courts,
Delhi
09.10.2023 Petitioners and Respondent no. 2 and no. 3 settled
all the disputes and differences at Samadhan, Delhi
High Court and signed the Settlement Agreement
Hence the present petition
10
CRL. M.C. OF 2023
IN THE MATTER OF:
VERSUS
F.I.R. No.: 97/2016
U/S: 498A/420/406/313/504/506 IPC &

3/4 DOWRY PROTECT ACT
P.S.: ALLAHABAD (NOW PRAYAGRAJ)
PETITION UNDER SECTION 482 OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE
SEEKING TO INVOKE THE INHERENT POWERS OF THE HON’BLE
HIGH COURT AND PRAYING INTER ALIA FOR QUASHING OF THE
F.I.R. No. 97/2016, P.S.: CIVIL LINES, ALLAHABAD (NOW
PRAYAGRAJ) UTTAR PRADESH, U/S: 498A/420/406/313/504/506
IPC & 3/4 DOWRY PROTECT ACT AND THE CONSEQUENTIAL
PROCEEDINGS/INVESTIGATION ARISING OUT OF THE SAID F.I.R.
TO,
THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF DELHI AND HIS COMPANION
JUSTICES OF THE SAID HIGH COURT.
THE HUMBLE PETITION OF THE
PETITIONER ABOVE NAMED
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

11
1. That the Petitioners are law abiding citizens of India and are filing
the present petition under section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code
seeking to invoke the inherent powers of the Hon’ble High Court
and praying inter-alia for quashing of the F.I.R. No.: 97/2016, P.S.:
Civil Lines, Allahabad (Prayagraj), Uttar Pradesh, U/S: 498A/
420/406/313/504/506 IPC & 3/4 Dowry Protection Act and the
consequential proceedings/investigation arising out of the said
F.I.R. The facts leading to the filing of this writ petition are
presented in brief in the succeeding paragraphs.
2. That the marriage between Petitioner no. 3 and Respondent no. 3,
was solemnized according to Hindu rites and rituals on 28.06.2012
and marriage was registered on 30.06.2012 and there is no issue
out of the wedlock.
3. That certain matrimonial differences arose between Petitioner no. 3
and Respondent no. 3. Pursuant whereto Respondent no. 2 lodged a
F.I.R. No 97/2016 dated 18.02.2016 under Section 498A, 323, 504,
313, 406, 420 506 IPC and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act,
1961 at Police Station Civil Lines, Allahabad against the Petitioners.
The true copy of the F.I.R. along with its true typed translated copy
is annexed herewith as ANNEXURE A
4. That the F.I.R. No. 97/2016, Police Station Civil Lines, Allahabad
and all proceedings emanating out of it were transferred to the
courts of Delhi vide order dated 18.07.2017 passed by the Hon’ble
Supreme Court of India and the said proceedings were registered
before Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Tis Hazari Courts as

12
Criminal Case no. 8311 of 2020 title State Vs Ram Chander
Sharma & Others.
5. That the marriage between Petitioner no. 3 and Respondent no. 3
has been dissolved vide judgment and decree dated 03.06.2016
passed by the Family Court at Bury St. Edmunds in BV15D16530
titled as “Chandan Sharma Vs. Aprajita Tripathi” and further been
dissolved vide the judgment and decree dated 07.05.2019 passed
by the Hon’ble Court of the Addl. Principle Judge, Family Court,
Allahabad in HMA No. 718/2016 titled as “Mrs. Aprajita Tripathi
Vs. Mr. Chandan Sharma”.
6. That the Petitioner no. 1 and no. 2 have been charged for offence
under section 406 IPC and the Petitioner no. 3 and no. 4 have been
discharged by the Ld. Trial Court, Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi
vide order dated 25.09.2019.
7. That all the Petitioners are related and are in-laws of the
Respondent no. 3, as mentioned in the memo of parties and as
such are known to each other. With the assistance of the Mediator
and proactive participation of the counsels for the Parties have
voluntarily arrived at an amicable solution resolving the all their
disputes and differences and also with regards to Stridhan,
maintenance (past, present and future), permanent alimony and
compromised with each other vide a Mediation Settlement,
Samadhan, Delhi High Court, dated 09.10.2023. The true copy of
the Mediation Settlement Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi dated
09.10.2023 is annexed herewith as ANNEXURE B. Furthermore,

13
the Respondent no. 3 has also given her affidavit that she has no
objection if the present F.I.R. against the Petitioners is quashed.
The affidavit of the Respondent no. 3 is annexed herewith
ANNEXURE C.
8. That as per the Mediation order dated 09.10.2023, it has been
agreed that Respondent no. 2 and Respondent no. 3 or any
member of the Respondent no. 3 shall not claim anything from the
Petitioners specially Petitioner no. 3 towards her maintenance
(past, present and future) or permanent Alimony.
9. That the Petitioners through this petition seeks to invoke the
inherent jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court to quash the F.I.R. and
the consequential proceedings arising from the said F.I.R.
mentioned herein above on the following amongst other grounds:
GROUNDS:
A. BECAUSE the matter has already been amicably settled and
compromised between the parties.
B. BECAUSE no useful purpose will be served by allowing the present
criminal proceedings to continue indefinitely in view of the
amicable settlement and compromise. Allowing the criminal
proceedings to continue would be an abuse of the process of the
court and moreover the Petitioners has already suffered enough.
C. BECAUSE it is well-settled law, that if proceedings are allowed to
continue where the trial would result in the acquittal of the
Petitioners, then the Court can quash the said proceedings. In

14
such circumstances, continuance of the proceeding would result in
wastage of the precious time of the Court.
D. BECAUSE the Respondent No. 2 and no. 3 and Petitioners have
withdrawn all allegations, which were levelled against each other
and settled their dispute. The Respondent No. 2 and no. 3 do not
want to pursue the criminal proceedings or any proceedings any
longer against the Petitioners.
E. BECAUSE the offences mentioned in the F.I.R. are non-
compoundable, however in view of the compromise and amicable
settlement of the matter/dispute between the parties, continuance
of the criminal proceedings would tantamount to infringement of
the liberty and the Fundamental right of the Petitioners if the relief
sought is not granted to the Petitioners.
F. BECAUSE in such situations when the Petitioners and Respondent
no. 2 and no. 3 have come to a mutual settlement, it is in the
interest of the both the parties and also for society as a whole that
the criminal proceedings be quashed.
G. BECAUSE if proceedings are allowed to be continued then there
cannot be any doubt that it will be an abuse of the process of the
court.
H. BECAUSE it has been time and again held by the Apex court that
where, in opinion of the court chances of ultimate conviction are
bleak and therefore no useful purpose is likely to be served by
allowing a criminal prosecution to continue. The Court may, taking

15
into consideration the special facts of the case, can quash the
proceedings, where it is expedient and in the interest of justice.
The Hon’ble Supreme Court has held in GIAN SINGH VS. STATE
OF PUNJAB (2012) 10 SCC 303 held that:-
“61. In other words, the High Court must consider
whether it would be unfair or contrary to the interest of
justice to continue with the criminal proceedings or
continuation of criminal proceedings would tantamount
to abuse of process of law despite settlement and
compromise between the victim and the wrongdoer and
whether to secure the ends of justice, it is appropriate
that criminal case is put to an end and if the answer to
the above question(s) is in affirmative, the High Court
shall be well within its jurisdiction to quash the
criminal proceedings.”
It was also held in MAHINDER SINGH V/S STATE OF PUNJAB
1993(2) CHANDIGARH CRIMINAL CASES , 444
“From the compromise deed and the affidavit
furnished by the Respondent it is made out that the
parties are no longer daggers drawn and what ever
dispute was there which resulted in the incident has
been settled amicably. The compromise is arrived at
without any threat or coercion by either side. It is
correct that some of the offences mentioned in the FIR
are non compoundable yet the court always lean in
the favour of compromise even in cases which are non

16
compoundable. This fact is not denied that non of the
injured suffered any grievous injury and remained as
indoor patient although the occurrence took place long
back yet challan has not been presented against the
parties the chances of conviction are bleak- Interest of
justice call for quashing – Petition allowed ”.
8. That the identity proof of the Petitioners and the Respondent no. 2
and Respondent no. 3 as well as their photographs have been
annexed here with as ANNEXURE D (COLLY).
9. That the Petitioners have no alternative remedy but to invoke the
inherent jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court.
10. That the Petitioners reserves their right to argue any other point if
required, at the time of arguments.
11. That no such, similar or other petition is pending before the
Hon’ble Supreme Court or before this Hon’ble Court.
PRAYER
In the light of the above facts and circumstances, it is most respectfully
prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to:
I. Quash the F.I.R. No 97/2016 dated 18.02.2016 under Section
498A, 323, 504, 313, 406, 420 506 IPC and Section 3/4 Dowry
Prohibition Act, 1961 at Police Station Civil Lines, Allahabad (Now

17
Prayagraj) and the consequential proceedings arising out of the
said F.I.R against the Petitioners,
II. Pass any Order(s), which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and
proper in the ends of justice.
PETITIONERS
THROUGH COUNSEL

Phone: 9350720673
3. 2. DECLARE
1UNDER:AS
HIMACHAL 77 1, THE RAM THE IN
SH.
the affidavit.
swear
this Respondent of That
of That circumstances YEARS STATE CHANDER
brevity.
sake ofparcel That Prayagraj) RAM IN
-20NOTARIAL same the MATTEROF: THE
the the I
am
of CHAND (NCT
g. NAro1.2e8a ARF
FxpiyDaReteShehpur this have F.IR.
accompanying PRADESH, R/O HON'BLE
contents has the SHARMA
VILLAGE OF
ACHy affidavit been been No of Petitioner
no. SHAMRA CRL.
M.C.
the DELHI)
4DES of 97/2016, HIGH
understo0d drafted &
the 3
as present and DO
REHLU, ORS.
petition no. S/O & (ceeonl
779NO
the said
AFFIDAVIT ORS.VERSUS COURT
HEREBY
by well LT.
inl
samepetition
by my P.S.:
case P.S.:
u/s the SH. OF
Shapr
(.2) conversant
Notary
2tl::ATTEST are me
counsel 2023OF
Civil 482 as present SOLEMNLY
SHAHPUR, BRAHM DELHI
not be and
such,
also Lines, Cr.P.C. AT
repeated admit Iunder petition,
with DATT
treated I NEW
am
o-2s23L2 them Allahabad
my seeking DIST. .RESPONDENTS
the AFFIRM AGED .PETITIONERS DELHI
herein competent father
DEPONENT asinstructions,
as facts
quashing KANGRA,
part correct. -in-law ABOUT
for AND
18
(Now and
the and to
and Verified
of
VERIFICATION:
the
belief
above at
and New
affidavits
nothing Delhi
on
has are this
NatarvATTESTE
Prkl!::
Shahpur
(tH.?)
been true
and day of
concealed
correct
therefrom. to
the
2023
|24o-2] best
of that
my
DEPONENT the
knowledgecontents
19
3. 2. 1 AND
KANGRA, ABOUT 1, THE RAM IN
SMT. THE
thisof That the accompanying
Prayagraj) affidavit.
swear
this
of ThattheCircumstances law ThatDECLARE IN
brevity.
sake ofparcel STATE CHANDER
same the of 73PREM MATTER THE
NOTAR/AR
oTARIAEos the the amI HIMACHAL (NCT
Gooarsharma FI.R. YEARS
Shahpur
Area/Madan contents have Respondent AS LATA HON'BLE
Expiy
Date 128No.Reg has the
OF SHARMA OF:
UNDER:
affidavit been been No of Petitioner CRL.
M.C.
ARY R/SHARMA
O DELHI)
the PRADESH, HIGH
of
understood 97/2016, &
drafted VILLAGE
as the present no. & 0RS.
SDESH petition no. AFFIDAVIT VERSUS COURT
the said W/O
ORS.
by and 3 2
samepetition P.S.: case in DO
by my u/s well REHLU, SH. OF
me the HEREBY 2023OF
are counsel as RAM
totarv
PtLl!
ATTEST.
Shat:pur(t! Civil 482 conversant DELHI
be and present
not such,
also Lines, Cr.P.C. P.S.:CHAND
repeated AT
admit Iunder SOLEMNLY
treated I petition, ...RESPONDENTS NEW
am with SHAHPUR,
them Allahabad
my seeking SHARMA .PETITIONERS
competent the DELHI
hereinthfoer
as facts mother
part quashing AFFIRM
correct. AGED
20
-|"223 and (Now

to
and -in
DIST.
and VERIFICATION:
Verified
o1
the
belief
above
at
and New
afidavits
Gahoeatnd aLa nothing Delhi
ar aave
alirmAten on
at are
Sha.our
(h!.)ATTESTE b has
thme the this
P'otiatl::iy end been true
declarationf sta
Akisy everieet and day of
concealed
tanma
afriratie correct
Lphiaa luth
a
therefrom. to
the
2023
best
of that
my
DEPONENT the
krnowledgecontents
21
a
22
IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT oF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CRL. M.C. OF 2023
IN THE MATTER OF:
RAM CHANDER SHARMA & ORS. .PETITIONERS
VERSUS
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS
AFFIDAVIT
I, MR. CHANDAN SHARMA S/O SH. RAM CHAND SHARMA AGED
ABOUT 42 YEARS R/O 86. BRIGHTSIDE AVENUE, STAINES-OPON
THAMES, TW181 NO, UNITED KINGDOM THROUGH ATTORNEY SH.

RAM CHAND SHARMA, DO HEREBY SOLEMNLY AFFIRM AND
DECLARE AS UNDER:
1. That Iam the Petitioner no. 3 in the present petition, husband of

the Respondent no. 3 and well conversant with the facts and
circumstances of the present case as such, I am competent to

swear this affidavit.
2 That the accompanying petition u/s 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing

of the FILR. No 97/2016, P.S.: Civil Lines, Alahabad (Now
Prayagraj) has been drafted by my counsel under my instructions,

the same have been understood by me and Iadmit them as correct.
3 That the contents of the said petition be also treated as part and
parcel of this affidavit as the same are not repeated herein for the
sake of brevity.
AR DEPONENT
/WadenBepáiSharma
AreaShahpur
Ren.No.128
ATTES
NOTARIAI Exoiy Date Notary i:
ShaBo0r(.
IMACH
23
VERIFICATION
Venfied at New Delhi on this day of 2023 that the contents
of the above affidavits are true and correct to the best of my knowledge
and belief and nothing has been concealed therefrom.
DEPONENT
ATTESTE)
w2-223
NOtary Pukli::
Shat.pur(H.2.))
24
IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CRL. M.C. OF 2023
IN THE MATTER OF:
RAM CHANDER SHARMA & ORS. ...PETITIONERS
VERSUS
AFFIDAVIT
I, MR. RAJAN SHARMA S/o SH. RAM CHAND SHARMA AGED ABOUT
YEARS R/O VILLAGE REHLU, P.s.: SHAHPUR, DIST. KANGRA,

HIMACHAL PRADESH, DO HEREBY SOLEMNLY AFFIRM AND
DECLARE AS UNDER:
1 That am the Petitioner no. 4 in the present petition, brother-in
law/Jaith of the Respondent no. 3 and well conversant with the

facts and circumstances of the present case as such, I am
competent to swear this affidavit.

of the F.I.R. No 97/ 2016, P.S.: Civil Lines,
Allahabad (Now
the same have been understood by me and Iadmit
them as correct.
3 That the contents of the said petition be also treated as

part and
parcel of this affidavit as the same are not repeated herein for
the
sake of brevity.
DEPONENT
Geta Shaa
GOV Ada Shahpur
Reg. No. 128
Expity Date ATTESTEL
NQTARIAL6-08NOTARIA P Notary Putli
Shatpur (H..".
25
VERIFICATION:
Verified at New Delhi on this day of 2023 that the contents
of the above affidavits are true and correct to the best of my knowiedge
DEPONENT
ATTESTED|24o-2o23
Notary Putl:
Sha:pur (H.!'.)
26
NEW DELHI
IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHIAT
CRL. M.C. OF 2023
IN THE MATTER OF:

PETITIONERS
RAM CHANDER SHARMA &ORS.
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS
THE STATE (NCT OF DELH) & ORS.
AFFIDAVIT
42
I, MRS. ARPNA SHARMA W/O MR. RAJAN SHARMAAGED ABOUT
YEARS R/O VILLAGE REHLU, P.S.: SHAHPUR, DIST. KANGRA,
DECLARE AS UNDER:
1. That Iam the Petitioner no. 5 in the present petition, sister-in-law/

Jaithani of the Respondent no. 3 and well conversant with the

competent to Swear this affidavit.
2. That the accompanying petition u/s 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing

of the FILR. No 97/2016, P.S.: Civil Lines, Allahabad (Now
thesame have been understood by me and Iadmit them as correct.
sake of brevity.
DEPONENT
Madan Gopa Sharma ATTESTE

AreaShahpur
Reg. No. 128
Expiry Date Notarv Dit:!
Shat.tr (!
27
VERIFICATION:
DEPONENT
eadua alfirmaen etanost ado
ndegstad he decaratior afriroatioe

hme ef k
ATTESTE
Otary Pur::
Sha.pur (..
28
CRL. M.A. OF 2023
IN
CRL. M.C. OF 2023
IN THE MATTER OF:
VERSUS
APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION U/S 482 Cr.P.C FROM FILING THE
CERTIFIED COPIES OF ORDER/ANNEXURES.
Most respectfully showeth:
1. That the Petitioners have filed the accompanying petition for
quashing of the F.I.R. No 97/2016, P.S.: Civil Lines, Allahabad (Now
Prayagraj) and the proceedings arising therefrom.
2. That the detailed facts and grounds taken in the petition may
kindly be read as part and parcel to this petition as the same are
not repeated here for the sake of brevity.
3. That the Petitioners have filed the true copy of the annexure with
accompanying petition and undertake to file the same in the
Hon’ble Court as and when the same will be required by the
Hon’ble Court from the Petitioners.

29
PRAYER
In the circumstances, it is therefore, respectfully prayed that this
Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased exempt the Petitioners from filing
the certified copies of the annexures in the interest of justice.
PETITIONERS
THROUGH COUNSEL

DATED: 12.10 .2023 Maven Legal LLP- Advocates & Consultants
Phone: 9350720673
3. 2. DECLARE
1UNDER:AS
HIMACHAL 77 1, THE RAM THE IN
SH.
the affidavit.
swear
this Respondent of That
of That circumstances YEARS STATE CHANDER
brevity.
sake ofparcel That Prayagraj) RAM IN
-20NOTARIAL same the MATTEROF: THE
the the I
am
of CHAND (NCT
g. NAro1.2e8a ARF
FxpiyDaReteShehpur this have F.IR.
accompanying PRADESH, R/O HON'BLE
contents has the SHARMA
VILLAGE OF
ACHy affidavit been been No of Petitioner
no. SHAMRA CRL.
M.C.
the DELHI)
4DES of 97/2016, HIGH
understo0d drafted &
the 3
as present and DO
REHLU, ORS.
petition no. S/O & (ceeonl
779NO
the said
AFFIDAVIT ORS.VERSUS COURT
HEREBY
by well LT.
inl
samepetition
by my P.S.:
case P.S.:
u/s the SH. OF
Shapr
(.2) conversant
Notary
2tl::ATTEST are me
counsel 2023OF
Civil 482 as present SOLEMNLY
SHAHPUR, BRAHM DELHI
not be and
such,
also Lines, Cr.P.C. AT
repeated admit Iunder petition,
with DATT
treated I NEW
am
o-2s23L2 them Allahabad
my seeking DIST. .RESPONDENTS
the AFFIRM AGED .PETITIONERS DELHI
herein competent father
as facts
quashing KANGRA,
part correct. -in-law ABOUT
for AND
30
(Now and
the and to
and Verified
of
VERIFICATION:
the
belief
above at
and New
affidavits
nothing Delhi
on
has are this
NatarvATTESTE
Prkl!::
Shahpur
(tH.?)
been true
and day of
concealed
correct
therefrom. to
the
2023
|24o-2] best
of that
my
DEPONENT the
knowledgecontents
31
3. 2. 1 AND
KANGRA, ABOUT 1, THE RAM IN
SMT. THE
thisof That the accompanying
Prayagraj) affidavit.
swear
this
of ThattheCircumstances law ThatDECLARE IN
brevity.
sake ofparcel STATE CHANDER
same the of 73PREM MATTER THE
NOTAR/AR
oTARIAEos the the amI HIMACHAL (NCT
Gooarsharma FI.R. YEARS
Shahpur
Area/Madan contents have Respondent AS LATA HON'BLE
Expiy
Date 128No.Reg has the
OF SHARMA OF:
UNDER:
affidavit been been No of Petitioner CRL.
M.C.
ARY R/SHARMA
O DELHI)
the PRADESH, HIGH
of
understood 97/2016, &
drafted VILLAGE
as the present no. & 0RS.
SDESH petition no. AFFIDAVIT VERSUS COURT
the said W/O
ORS.
by and 3 2
samepetition P.S.: case in DO
by my u/s well REHLU, SH. OF
me the HEREBY 2023OF
are counsel as RAM
totarv
PtLl!
ATTEST.
Shat:pur(t! Civil 482 conversant DELHI
be and present
not such,
also Lines, Cr.P.C. P.S.:CHAND
repeated AT
admit Iunder SOLEMNLY
treated I petition, ...RESPONDENTS NEW
am with SHAHPUR,
them Allahabad
my seeking SHARMA .PETITIONERS
competent the DELHI
hereinthfoer
as facts mother
part quashing AFFIRM
correct. AGED
32
-|"223 and (Now

to
and -in
DIST.
and VERIFICATION:
Verified
o1
the
belief
above
at
and New
afidavits
Gahoeatnd aLa nothing Delhi
ar aave
alirmAten on
at are
Sha.our
(h!.)ATTESTE b has
thme the this
P'otiatl::iy end been true
declarationf sta
Akisy everieet and day of
concealed
tanma
afriratie correct
Lphiaa luth
a
therefrom. to
the
2023
best
of that
my
DEPONENT the
krnowledgecontents
33
a
34
IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT oF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CRL. M.C. OF 2023
IN THE MATTER OF:
VERSUS
AFFIDAVIT
I, MR. CHANDAN SHARMA S/O SH. RAM CHAND SHARMA AGED
ABOUT 42 YEARS R/O 86. BRIGHTSIDE AVENUE, STAINES-OPON
THAMES, TW181 NO, UNITED KINGDOM THROUGH ATTORNEY SH.

RAM CHAND SHARMA, DO HEREBY SOLEMNLY AFFIRM AND
DECLARE AS UNDER:
1. That Iam the Petitioner no. 3 in the present petition, husband of

the Respondent no. 3 and well conversant with the facts and
circumstances of the present case as such, I am competent to

swear this affidavit.

of the FILR. No 97/2016, P.S.: Civil Lines, Alahabad (Now

the same have been understood by me and Iadmit them as correct.
sake of brevity.
AR DEPONENT
/WadenBepáiSharma
AreaShahpur
Ren.No.128
ATTES
NOTARIAI Exoiy Date Notary i:
ShaBo0r(.
IMACH
35
VERIFICATION
Venfied at New Delhi on this day of 2023 that the contents
DEPONENT
ATTESTE)
w2-223
NOtary Pukli::
Shat.pur(H.2.))
36
IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CRL. M.C. OF 2023
IN THE MATTER OF:
VERSUS
AFFIDAVIT
I, MR. RAJAN SHARMA S/o SH. RAM CHAND SHARMA AGED ABOUT
YEARS R/O VILLAGE REHLU, P.s.: SHAHPUR, DIST. KANGRA,

DECLARE AS UNDER:
1 That am the Petitioner no. 4 in the present petition, brother-in
law/Jaith of the Respondent no. 3 and well conversant with the

competent to swear this affidavit.

of the F.I.R. No 97/ 2016, P.S.: Civil Lines,
Allahabad (Now
the same have been understood by me and Iadmit
them as correct.
3 That the contents of the said petition be also treated as

part and
parcel of this affidavit as the same are not repeated herein for
the
sake of brevity.
DEPONENT
Geta Shaa
GOV Ada Shahpur
Reg. No. 128
Expity Date ATTESTEL
NQTARIAL6-08NOTARIA P Notary Putli
Shatpur (H..".
37
VERIFICATION:
of the above affidavits are true and correct to the best of my knowiedge
DEPONENT
ATTESTED|24o-2o23
Notary Putl:
Sha:pur (H.!'.)
38
NEW DELHI
IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHIAT
CRL. M.C. OF 2023
IN THE MATTER OF:

PETITIONERS
RAM CHANDER SHARMA &ORS.
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS
THE STATE (NCT OF DELH) & ORS.
AFFIDAVIT
42
I, MRS. ARPNA SHARMA W/O MR. RAJAN SHARMAAGED ABOUT
YEARS R/O VILLAGE REHLU, P.S.: SHAHPUR, DIST. KANGRA,
DECLARE AS UNDER:
1. That Iam the Petitioner no. 5 in the present petition, sister-in-law/

Jaithani of the Respondent no. 3 and well conversant with the

competent to Swear this affidavit.
2. That the accompanying petition u/s 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing

of the FILR. No 97/2016, P.S.: Civil Lines, Allahabad (Now
thesame have been understood by me and Iadmit them as correct.
sake of brevity.
DEPONENT
Madan Gopa Sharma ATTESTE

AreaShahpur
Reg. No. 128
Expiry Date Notarv Dit:!
Shat.tr (!
39
VERIFICATION:
DEPONENT
eadua alfirmaen etanost ado
ndegstad he decaratior afriroatioe

hme ef k
ATTESTE
Otary Pur::
Sha.pur (..
40
ANNEXURE-A (COLLY)
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
52
53
ANNEXURE -B
SAMADHAN
Delhi Higlh Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre

Delhi HighCourt, Sher Shah Road, New Delhi
SETTLEMENTAGREEMENT
THIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO ON 09.10.2023.

BETWEEN
1. (i) SH. SATYAPRAKASH S/OLATE SH BASANT SINGH R/O 50/2,

LOHIYA MARG, POLICE STATION, CIVIL LINES, DISTRICT
ALLAHABAD (PRAYAGRAJ) UTTAR PRADESH.
(ii) MS. APRAJITA TRIPATHI D/O SH. SATYA PRAKASH R/O 50/2,
LOHIYA MARG, POLICE STATION, CIVIL LINES, DISTRICT
ALLAHABAD (PRAYAGRAJ) UTTAR PRADESH PRESENTLY AT
LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM THROUGH HER POWER OF
ATTORNEY SH. SATYA PRAKASH. POWER OF ATTORNEY
DATED 22.09.2023 IS ANNEXURE A.
(HEREINAFTER COLLECTIVELY REFERRED TO AS THE

FIRST PARTY)
AND
2. (i) SH. RAM CHAND SHARMA S/OBRAHMA DUTT SHARMA R/O

VILLAGE REHLU, POLICE STATION SHAHPUR, DISTT.
KANGRA, HIMACHAL PRADESH.
54
SAMADHAN 2
SHRAM CHAND SHARMA R/O

(i) SMT. PREM LATA SHARMA W/O
SHAHPUR, DISTT.
VILLAGE REHLU, POLICE STATION
KANGRA, HIMACHAL PRADESIL
(iii) MR. CHANDAN SHARMA S/O SH RAM CHAND SHARMA R/O 86,
BRIGHTSIDE AVENUE STAINES-UPON-THAMES, TW18 INQ,
UNITED KINGDOM THROUGH HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY SH.
RAM CHAND SHARMA, POWER OF ATTORNEY DATED
26.09.2023 IS ANNEXURE-B.
(iv) MR.RAJAN SHARMA S/O SH RAM CHAND SHARMA R/O

VILLAGE REHLU, POLICE STATION SHAHPUR, DISTT.
KANGRA, HIMACHAL PRADESH, THROUGH HIS POWER OF
ATTORNEY SH. RAM CHAND SHHARMA, POWER OF ATTORNEY
DATED 07.10.2023 IS ANNEXURE C.
SHARMA R/O VILLAGE

(v) MRS. ARPNA SHARMA W/O SH RAJAN
KANGRA,
REHLU, POLICE STATION SHAHPUR, DISTT.
ATTORNEY
HIMACHAL PRADESH THROUGH HIS POWER OF
ATTORNEY DATED
SH. RAM CHAND SHARMA. POWER OF
07.10.2023 IS ANNEXURIE C.
TO AS THE
(HEREINAFTER COLLECTIVELY REFERRED
SECOND PARTY)
55
SAMADHAN
3
WHEREAS the marriage between Aprajita Tripathi, daughter of the First

Party and Chandan Sharma S/o Sh. Ram Chand Sharma was solemnized
according to Hindu rites and rituals on 28.06.2012 and marriage was
registered on 30.06.2012 and there is no issue out of the wedlock.
AND WHEREAS certain matrimonial differences arose between Aprajita

Tripathiand Chandan Sharma pursuant whereto Sh. Satya Prakash (Party
1()) lodged a FIR No. 97/2016 dated 18.02.20 16 under Section 498A,
323, 504, 313, 406, 420 506 IPC and Section 3 /4 Dowry Prohibition Act,
1961 at Police Station Civil Lines, Allahabad against Chandan Sharma
(Husband), Ram Chand Sharma (Father in Law), Prem Lata Sharma
(Mother In law), Rajan Sharma (Brother In Law) and Arpna Sharma
(Sister In Law).
AND WHEREASthe FIR No 97/2016 and all proceedings emanating out

of it were transferred to the courts of Delhi vide order dated 18.07.2017
passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India and the said proceedings
were registered before Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Tis Hazari Courts as
Criminal Case No. 8311 of 2020 title State Vs Ram Chander Sharma &
Others.
AND WHEREAS Sh. Satya Prakash preferred CRL.M.C. Nos.

| 1491/2018, 1618/2018, 1623/2018\against order of maintainability of
Anticipatory Bail applications dated 09.03.2018 and CRL.M.C. Nos.
2578/2018, 2648/2018, 2662/2018 against order of grant of anticipatory
56
56
SAMADHAN 4
P. No. 731/2019 against order on

bail dated 23.03.2018 and CRL Rev
court at Tis Hazari Delhi
charge dated 25.05.2019 of the Ld. Session
before Hon'ble High Court of Delhi at New Dellhi.
State Vs.
AND WHEREAS another Crl, Rey. P. No. 1057/20 18 titled as
Court
Prem Lata Sharma & Ors. is also pending before the Hon'ble High
of Delhi at New Delhi.
AND WHEREAS the mariage between Chandan Sharma and Aprajita

Tripathi has been dissolved vide judgment and decree dated 03.06.2016
passed by the Family Court at Bury St, Edmunds in BVI5D16530 titled as
Chandan SharmaVs. Aprajita Tripathi.
and Chandan
AND WHEREAS the marriage between Aprajita Tripathi
decree dated
Sharma has further been dissolved vide the judgment and
Principle Judge,
07.05.2019 passed by the Hon'ble Court of the Addl.
Mrs. Aprajita
Family-Court, Allahabad in HMA No. 718/2016 titled as
Tripathi Vs. Mr. Chandan Sharma.
order dated 06.09.2023, passed by

AND WHERCAS vide a common
aforesaid petitions, the parties
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amit Sharma in the
Samadhan (Delhi High Court Mediation
were directed to appear before
and Conciliation Centre)on 11.09.2023.
57
SAMADHAN
S
AND WHEREAS Samadhan nominated Mr. Tarun Diwan, to act as

Mediator inthe aforesaid Petitions and the parties agreed to the samne.
AND WHEREAS subsequently, Ms. Neelam Rathore, was nominated to

act as Mediator in the aforesaid Petitions and the parties agreed to the
same.
AND WHEREAS it is agreed that Aprajita Tripathi and Chandan Sharna

being residents of London, United Kingdom they would appear through
video conferencing to record their statements before the Hon'ble High
Court of Delhi at New Delhi as and when the matter is listed for the
disposal of the aforesaid petitions in termns of this Hon'ble Court.
AND WHEREAS Ms. Aprajita Tripathi (Party No. 1(ii)) being a resident
of London, United Kingdom has joined the mediation sessions through
video conferencing and has duly authorized her father, Sh. Satya Prakash
(Party No. 1(i)), the First Party to enter into and execute this Settlement
Agreement on her behalf which will be binding upon her vide Power of
Attorney dated 22.09.2023 ((ANNEXURE-A).
AND WHEREAS Mr. Chandan Sharma (Party No. 2(ii1)) also being a
citizen of United Kingdom and residing at London has duly authorized his
father, Sh. Ram Chand Sharma (Party No. 2(i),to enter into and execute
this Settlement Agreement on his behalf which will be binding upon him
vide his Power of Attorney dated 26.09.2023 (ANNEXURE-B).
58
58
SAMADHAN
6
AND WHEREAS Mr. Rajan Sharma (Party No. 2(iv)) and Ms. Arpna
Sharma (Party No. 2(v)) have through their Special Power of Attorney
dated 07.10.2023 authorized Mr. Ram Chand Sharma, (Party No. 2(i)) to
enter into and execute this Settlement Agreement on their behalf
(ANNEXURE-C).
AND WHEREAS mediation sessions were held with the parties and their
respective counsels on various dates physically and through video
conferencing.
The parties, with the assistance of the Mediator and proactive participation
of the counsels for the Parties have voluntarily arrived at an amicable
solution resolving the above mentioned disputes and differences on the
following terms and conditions:
a. That all the parties to the present Settlement Agreement have agreed to
settle all their disputes without any monetary consideration and
without any further litigation towards fu!! and final settlement of all
the disputes and claims of the First and Second Party:
b. That the parties agree that the First Party shall give no objection for
quashing of the F.I.R. No. 0097/2016 under sections 498-A, 323, 504,
313, 406, 420, S06 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act,
1961 at P.S. - Civil Lines, District-Allahabad, against the Second
Party and provide all cooperation in this regard.
59
SAMADHAN
7
c. That Aprajita Tripathi, daughter of the First Party has agreed and
undertaken by way of her affidavit dated 22.09.2023 that she accepts
and affirms the terms and conditions of this Settlement Agreement,
that her family members have mutually and amicably settled all the
disputes and differences fully and finally, and without any
consideration and that no other or further disputes or claims survive
between her, Chandan Sharma and their respective families. She has
further stated in her affidavit that she has no objections to the quashing
of the FIR No. 97/2016 and any other consequential proceedings
arising out of the above said FIR before any authorityl Court in India
or abroad. She has further undertaken to abide by all the terms and
conditions of this Settlement Agreement. The said affidavit of Ms.
Aprajita Tripathiis annexed herewith as ANNEXURE-D.
d. That Sh. Ram Chand Sharma (Party No. 2(i1) for himself and on
behalf of his son Chandan Sharma has agreed and undertakes to not
dispute or challenge the judgment and decree dated 07.05.2019 passed
by the Hon'ble Court of the Addl. Principal Judge, Family Court,
Allahabad in HMANo. 718/2016 titled as Mrs. Aprajita Tripathi Vs.
Mr. Chandan Sharma wherein the marriage between him and Aprajita
Tripathi has been dissolved permanently.
e. That it is agreed between the parties that the parties shall request the
Hon'ble High Court of Delhi to dispose of all the matters CRL.M.C.
Nos. 1491/2018, 1618/2018, 1623/2018, 2578/2018, 2648/2018,
60
60
SAMADHAN.
2662/2018 and CRL. Rev. P.No.73 1/2019 in terms of this Settlement
Agreement.
f. That the parties agree that they shall appear before the Hon'ble High
Court of Delhi physically or through virtual hearing to make their
statements in terms of the present Settlement Agreement. Further it is
agreed between the parties that Aprajita Tripathi and Chandan Sharma
will appear through VC before the High Court of Delhi at the time of
hearing for giving / recording their consent in terms of this Settlement
Agreement.
g. That it is agreed between the parties that if any of the party defaults
any of the terms and conditions mentioned in the present Settlement
Agreement, he/ she shall be liable for Contempt of Court in terms of
the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
h. That the parties herein confirm that there are no other litigations/
complaints pending other than the cases mentioned in this Settlement
Agreement.
i. That the parties agree that after execution of this Settlement

Agreement, both the parties shall be left with no claims or disputes
against each other and / or qua their family members.
j. That the Parties agree that they have arrived at the present Settlement
Agreement with their own free will and desire and without any
61
SAMADHAN
pressure, fraud, force, coercion or undue influence by either of the

Parties. The Parties further agree that terms of this Settlement
Agreement are final and undertake that they will not raise any dispute
regarding this Settlement Agreement in present or future.
k. That the parties undertake before the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi to
abide by the terms and conditions set out in the agreement and not to
dispute the same hereinafter in future.
PARTIES' SIGNATURES
Sh. Satya Prakash for himself

and on behalf of his daughter
Ms. Aprajita Tripathi
COLLECTIVELY FIRST PARTY
Lgeyh
Sh. Ram Chand Sharma
h
for himself and on behalf of
Mr. Chandan Sharma
Mr.Rajan Sharma
Mrs. Arpna Sharma
Smt. Prem Lata Sharma

COLLECTIVELY SECOND PARTY
62
SAMADHAN
10
COUNDSLS' SIGNATURES
Mr. T.N. Singh, Advocate (Enrl. No. D/179/1980)

Counsel for the First Party
Mr. Jeevesh Nehta, Advocate (Enrl. No. D-689/2007)

Counsel for the Second Party
(Neelam Rathore)
Mediator
63
Rlomee 2659/223
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KArir,
Notar
This Power of Attorney is executed at London (UK) on
22 nd SEPTEMBER, 2023.
By this Power of Attorney I, MS. APRAJITA TRIPATHI
DAUGHTER of SH. SATYA PRAKASH Resident of 50/2,

Lohiya Marg, Colvin Road, Civil Lines Allahabad
Distt. Prayagraj, daughter of Complainant in F.I.R.

No. 97/2016 at P.S.: Civil Line, Allahabad (Now
Prayagraj) and in Case/Suit No. CRL. (Rev. ) 731 of
2019 hereinafter referred to as the said cases,
pending adjudication before the Hon'ble High Court

of Delhi at New Delhi, hereby nominate, constitute
and appoint my father SH. SATYA PRAKASH SON OF LT.
SH. BASANT SINGH resident of 50/2, Lohiya Marg,
Colvin Road, Civil Lines Allahabad Distt.
Prayagraj, as my attorney, in my name and On my
behalf to do or execute all or any of the fol lowing

acts or things in connection with the said case:
64
64
the above said Court or in
1.To represent me before
where the above said cases Or
any other Court,
arising out of the
any consequential proceedings
are transferred.
said casesr
Samadhan, Delhi High
2.To represent me before the
said cases or
Court Mediation Centre in the above
out of the
any consequential proceedings arising
said cases.
appoint any solicitor, counsel,
3. To engage Or
advocate, pleader or lawyer to conduct the said
case.
Compromise/settle/mediate/withdraw the said
A.To
Cases Or any consequential proceedings arising
out of the said cases, in such manner as the said
attorney shall thinks fit.

mediation
5.To sign and verify all documents,
settlement agreement, Compromise deed,

documents before the
applications, petitions or
the
above said Court or in any other Court, where
Cases any Consequential proceedings
said
Out of the said Cases are pending
arising
adjudication.
this power of
6.That the executant through
act on my behalf
attorney authorizes my father to
settlement On any termS
to enter into amicable
Chandan Sharma, (husband) ,
and conditions with
(father in law) , Prem Lata
Ram Chandra Sharma,
65
13
Sharma, (mother in law), Rajan Sharma, (Jeth) and
Aparna Sharma, (Jethani) in the cases pending
before various Courts in pursuance of FIR No. 97
of 2016 lodged in PS- Civil Lines, Allahabad to
be quashed and all acts done by my father to
enter into settlement all dispute and difference
etc. in this regard will be binding upon me as if
done by me for which my affidavit in support of
settlement is also being sworn in from UK.
7.To do generally all other acts and things for the
conduct of the said case as I could have done the
same if I was personally present.
And I do hereby that all acts, deeds and

things, legally, done or executed by the said
attorney shall be deemed to be acts, deeds and
things done by me. I bind myself to ratify and

confirm all and whatever is done or lawfully
caused to be done for me on account of powers
given by this Power of Attorney.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, have signed this
Power of Attorney on this 22nd day of SEPTEMBER

2023 in the presence of the:
(APRARTA TRIPATH)
Sifred, seeot | U
Identified by: dellurel as
Witness 2 (q/3
,
Hariny
Yotary
a ICTHAHIi
AAJNE XURE
66
POWEROF ATTORNEY 66
This Power of Attorney is executed at Hayes, MiddkesezlK On 26
SEPTEMBER, 2023.
By this Power of Attorney I, CHANDAN SHARMA SON OF SH RAM CHAND

SHARMA residing at 86 Brightside Avenue Staines-upon-thames, Twl8
lnq, Country United Kingdom
I hereby nominate, constitute and appoint my father SH. Ram Chand

Sharma Son of Late sh. Brahmn Dutt resident of VPO: Rehlu Tehsil:
Shahpur Distt: Kangra State: Himachal Pardesh Country : India as
my attorney, in my name and on my behalf to do or execute all or any of
the following acts or things in connection with the said case:
1. To represent me in case F.I.R. No. 97/2016 at P.S.: Civil Line,
Allahabad (Now Prayagraj) and in CRL. (Rev.) 731 of 2019 or any

other petition or legal proceedings hereinafter referred to as the said
NotaryPubli
cases, pending adjudication before the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi
England at New Delhi, above said Court or in any other Court, where the
Wales 2032
above said cases or any consequential proceedings arising out of the
020 857
said cases, are transferred.
2. To represent me before the Samadhan, Delhi High Court Mediation

Centre in the above said cases or any consequential proceedings
arising out of the said cases.
3. To engage or appoint any solicitor, counsel, advocate, pleader or

lawyer toconduct the said case.
To compromise/settle/mediate/withdraw the said cases or or any
consequential proceedings arising out of the said cases, in such
manner as the said attorney shall think fit with the complainant Sh
Satya Prakash and Ms Aprajita Tripathi.
5. To sign and verify all documents, mediated settlement agreement,
compromise deed, applications, petitions or documents before the
above said Court or in any other Court, where the said cases or any
67
consequential proceedings arising out of the said cases are pending
adjudication.
6 To do generally all other acts and things for the conduct of the said
case as Icould have done the same if Iwas personally present.
And Ido hereby that all acts, deeds and things, legally, done or executed
by the said attorney shall be deemed to be acts, deeds and things done by
me. I bind myself to ratify and confirm all and whatever is done or lawfully
caused to be done for me on account of powers given by these Power of
Attorney.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Ihave signed this Power of Attorney, as a deed,
on this 26 day of SEPTEMBER 2023 in the presence of the:
Alamolen
England
&
CHANDAN SHARMA Wales
Identified by: Notarial Certificate O20 82

CHANDAN SHARMA appears before
me. I identify him with the help of his
British passport number 538640446.He
executes this docurnent in my presence. I
witness his signature as a Notary Public
in the United Kingdom, today on 26
2023. My
Sept
commission expires on
retirement.
A. R. Babar.
..(Notary Pubiic
T: 020 8573 0333 F: 020
8573 2592
166 Lansbury Drive, Hayes
Middlesex, UK, UB4 8SG
Email: babar@magnasolicitors.co.uk
26 SEP 2323
68
68
5386404462
GBR8208204
M26092674
BRSHARMA<<CHANDAN<<< atHERE
UNITE CETTE
716 ARE
PAGE
NO AGE
KINGDONN O1CIAL ESt IS
RESERVED
RESERYEE
OFGREAT OBsERVAT
26 26 BRITISh
CITIZEN
20 CHANDAN
SHARMA
AUNFOR
5EP SEP AUG ORSERVATONS
IONse
REHLU BRITAIN oeeooee OFICAL
/SEPT/SEPT
/AQUT GBR
AND
2ó 16 82 OTCVELLES)
OBSERVATIONS
NORTHERN
HMPO
538640446
IRELAND
k<<02
<<<
oary Pubz
Engiand
&
Wales
el
69
FiFTY
RUPEES
5.59 Rs.50
INDA
AIAL
ANONUDICH
NOTARIAL ACHAL PRADESH 0 583869
Siate:
POWER OF ATTORNEY
N.J.STAMPS : Rs. 100/
Pieces 1
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT We, Rajan Sharma aged 43 Yrs.,
Slo Shri Ram Chand Sharma, & Arpna Sharma, aged 42 Yrs., Wlo Sh Rajan
Sharma, botii Rlo VPO Reniu, Teusit Shahpur, Distt. Kangra, H.P. do hereby
nominate,constitute and appoint Shri Ram Chand Sharma, Slo Late Brahm Dutt, R/o
VPO Rehlu, TelhsilShahpur, Distt. Kangra,HP. to be my true and lawful attomey for
us and in our name and on our behalf to do or cause to be done all or any of the
following acts, deeds, matters and things:
WHREAS a Court Case pending before Hon'ble High Court of Delhi AND
WHEREAS due to our personal preoccupation and other personal preoccupations,
it is not possible for us to atteidthe above mentioned Court Case at our own level
. Therefore, we have authorized Sh. Ram Chand Sharma to exercise the following powers
on my behalf:
1- To appear in above complaint/suit/proceedingslappeals etc. against any
person/defendant whomsoever and for that purpose to do all and every act
whatsoever necessary in any manner and proper in accordance with law and to
represent me from the original jurisdiction of trial court upto the Supreme Court
of India and to compromise the case at any stage. To receive money in the above
matter, to compromise the matter.
Notary Pblc (220

Dnarashala
70 70
Adi
71
FIFTY
RUPEES
5) Rs.50
ND,
NDI NONNDCNE
fHúa eN HIMACHAL PRADESH D 583871
Affiliate Tribunals, Officers,

2 To deal with all the Courts, RERA, whatsoever and wheresoever.
Authorities, Local bodies etc. in all respects the
applications etc. in
To file all the pleadings, affidavit, agreements, in the Lok Adalat lor
depose,'statements
above complaint. To sign
compromise and toreceive money on my behalf.
and to present in any
3 To appoint advocates and sign their vakalatnama or advocates. To file
Court and to cancel any vakalainama or any advocate
rejoinder, affidavits,
reply, give statement, writen statement, replication, sign on my behalf
proof affidavit etc. regarding the said complaint and
before any statutory authoritýand legal entity.
any office, Court,
To apply for and make inspection of any record of
department, authority.
papers
To apply for and obtain certified copies of any deed, documents, department.
Court, office or
sprders judgments statements etc. from any affidavit regarding the aforesaid
To sign and execute any affidavit, proof
case and to get it attested on my behalf.
whatsoever and
To deal with the police department in all respects
wheresoever required.
the facts of the above said
8 That Sh. Ram Chand Sharma is also. aware of
behalf.
suit/case and wellcompetent to receive the SPA on our
and wheresoever
9 Andgenerally to do all acts, deeds and things whatsoeverpowers have been
which the
required to be done to preserve our rights for
given.
Aspra
72
72
2
2|
Nº 0079034 2 hinachal obernment Judicial Baper
3
It is declared that the acts, deeds and things done by us above attorney shall be
construedto be acts, deeds and things done by us and we undertake to ratify and confirm
all and whatsoever that my said Attorney shall lawfully do or cause to be done for us by
virtue of the powers hereby given.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set and subscribed our hands this
07-10-2023.
EXECUTACNT.
WITNESSES:
1)
)
Rajah-Sharma
Navneet Gupta, ADV Dharamshala
Arpna Sharma
2) Harish Kumar, Advocate, Dharamshala
i.trlufe lhat tiis corntonis of decsarHLIO.

ifurnaüon stateinenis M2ie on catn nave
i90 rad cyef & Dianed tocieponentt
CURnt wno setmeo to UNdestand the
. aratcna{irnatonistatement 2t tim
3us
Notary Pubik (220
Onaralishaia./
73
BEFORE SAMADHAN" DELHI HIGH COURT

MEDIATION AND
CONCILIATION CENTRE DELHI HIGH COURT, SHER SHAH ROAD Notat
NEW DELHI
IN THE MATTER OF:
SATYA PRAKASH ...PETITIONER
VERSUS
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ...RESPONDENTS
AFFIDAVIT
I, APRAJITA TRIPATHI D/O SATYA PRAKASH, AGED AB0UT 36 R/O
50/2, Lohiya Marg, Colvin Road, Civil Lines Allahabad Distt.

Prayagraj, DO HEREBY SOLEMNLY AFFIRM AND DECLARE AS
UNDER:
1. That my father lodged the FIR No. 97/2016 under section
498A/323/504/313/406/420/506 IPC and Section 3 & 4 Dowry

Prohibition Act, 1961 at PS Civil Lines, Allahabad now Prayagraj
against Chandan Sharmna, Ram Chander Sharna, Premn Lata

Sharma, Rajan Sharma and Arpana Sharma all R/o Village Rehlu,
Police Station Shahpur, Distt. Kangra, Himachal Pradesh.
2. That vide the judgment and decree dated 07.05.2019 passed by the
Hon ble Court of Addl. Principle Distt. Judge, Family Court,
Allahabad in HMA No. 718/2016 titled as Mrs. Aprajita Tripathi
Vs. Mr. Chandan Sharma divorce has been granted between me
and Sh. Chandan Sharma and pursuant thereto our respective
family members have mutually and amicably settled all our

74
23
without any
disputes and differences, fully and finally and
consideration.
Settlement
3. That I have read and understood the contents of the
Agreement and I accept and affirm the terms and conditions
thereof as arrived at between my father Sh. Satya Prakash and my
mother Smt. Sunanda Tripathi and Sh. Ram Chander Sharma,
Smt. Prema Lata Sharma, Sh. Rajan Sharma and Smt. Arpana
Sharma before Samadhan (Delhi High Court Mediation and
Conciliation Centre). No other or further disputes or claims survive
between me, Chandan Sharma and our respective farmilies.
4. That Ifurther state that I have no objections if the aforesaid F.I.R.

No. 97/2016 under section 498A/323/504/313/406/420/506 IPC
and Section 3 &% 4 Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 at PS Civil Lines,
Allahabad now Prayagraj and any other consequential proceedings
arising out of the said F.I.R., if any before any Authority / Court of
Law in India or abroad, are quashed.
5. That I undertake to abide by all the terms and conditions of the

Settlement Agreement.
(APRATITA TRJPATHI)
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION:
Verified at London (UK) on this 22nd day of September 2023 that the
contents of the above affidavit are true and correct to my knowledge, no
part of it is false and nothing has been concealed therefrom.
APRASI TA TRIPATH)
M DEPONENT
2 (ol2o3
Falan11apKarim
Noia:Psiric
EnglussWles Notar
75
ANNEXURE-C
BEFORE SAMADHAN" DELHI HIGH COURT
MEDIATION AND
CONCILIATION CENTRE DELHI HIGH COURT, SHER SHAH ROAD Notat
NEW DELHI
IN THE MATTER OF:
SATYA PRAKASH ...PETITIONER
VERSUS
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ...RESPONDENTS
AFFIDAVIT
I, APRAJITA TRIPATHI D/O SATYA PRAKASH, AGED AB0UT 36 R/O
50/2, Lohiya Marg, Colvin Road, Civil Lines Allahabad Distt.

Prayagraj, DO HEREBY SOLEMNLY AFFIRM AND DECLARE AS
UNDER:
1. That my father lodged the FIR No. 97/2016 under section
498A/323/504/313/406/420/506 IPC and Section 3 & 4 Dowry

Prohibition Act, 1961 at PS Civil Lines, Allahabad now Prayagraj
against Chandan Sharmna, Ram Chander Sharna, Premn Lata

Sharma, Rajan Sharma and Arpana Sharma all R/o Village Rehlu,
Police Station Shahpur, Distt. Kangra, Himachal Pradesh.
2. That vide the judgment and decree dated 07.05.2019 passed by the
Hon ble Court of Addl. Principle Distt. Judge, Family Court,
Allahabad in HMA No. 718/2016 titled as Mrs. Aprajita Tripathi
Vs. Mr. Chandan Sharma divorce has been granted between me
and Sh. Chandan Sharma and pursuant thereto our respective
family members have mutually and amicably settled all our

76
23
without any
disputes and differences, fully and finally and
consideration.
Settlement
3. That I have read and understood the contents of the
Agreement and I accept and affirm the terms and conditions
thereof as arrived at between my father Sh. Satya Prakash and my
mother Smt. Sunanda Tripathi and Sh. Ram Chander Sharma,
Smt. Prema Lata Sharma, Sh. Rajan Sharma and Smt. Arpana
Sharma before Samadhan (Delhi High Court Mediation and
Conciliation Centre). No other or further disputes or claims survive
between me, Chandan Sharma and our respective farmilies.
4. That Ifurther state that I have no objections if the aforesaid F.I.R.

No. 97/2016 under section 498A/323/504/313/406/420/506 IPC
and Section 3 &% 4 Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 at PS Civil Lines,
Allahabad now Prayagraj and any other consequential proceedings
arising out of the said F.I.R., if any before any Authority / Court of
Law in India or abroad, are quashed.
5. That I undertake to abide by all the terms and conditions of the

Settlement Agreement.
(APRATITA TRJPATHI)
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION:
Verified at London (UK) on this 22nd day of September 2023 that the
contents of the above affidavit are true and correct to my knowledge, no
part of it is false and nothing has been concealed therefrom.
APRASI TA TRIPATH)
M DEPONENT
2 (ol2o3
Falan11apKarim
Noia:Psiric
EnglussWles Notar
Hmachal
Pradesh Address
176206Rehlu fra -
S/O 176206
Late
Teh
Shahhpur, Shri
Br
ahrn Unicque
Rehu,Dut, Goverrert
inda ot
VID
4046
2149
5028 VID:
WARD identiication 2149
4046
5028 qyMALE Ram
in
elpGuida.gov.9106 : Kangr
9106
a,NO 12/06/1947
DOB
eta,
hard
5870 3,
VPO
5870
Shar
Athority
1998 ma
1998
8308
8308
of
www.uidai.gov.n )
india
ANNEXURE -E
-D(COLLY)
(COLLY)
77
eCO: Issue Date 21 112o1
Shahpu,
Himachal
Pradesh-
176206AddresS:
Ram
1947
lu
RihChand 176206 -
Khas
Sharma, Unique
(52), Goveiment of
VID
6265
2444
4135 Sharma
Prem
Lata
D
4135
2444
VI6265 Kangra, VPO identiication
helpuidai.gov.in
www.uidai.gov.in : :9131 A
9131 Rehu,
05/12/1951
FEMALE /DOB
7271 Teh 7271
Autority
4241 4241
1145 of 1145
tndia
RRDHAAR
78
5386404462
GBR8208204
M26092674
RSHARMA<<CHANDAN<<< atHERE
UNITE CETTE
716 ARE
PAGE
NO AGE
KINGDONN O1CIAL ESt IS
RESERVED
RESERYEE
OFGREAT OBsERVAT
26 26 BRITISh
CITIZEN
20 CHANDAN
SHARMA
AUNFOR
5EP SEP AUG ORSERVATONS
IONse
REHLU BRITAIN oeeooee OFICAL
/SEPT/SEPT
/AQUT GBR
AND
2ó 16 82 OTCVELLES)
OBSERVATIONS
NORTHERN
HMPO
538640446
IRELAND
k<<02
<<<
oary Pubz
Engiand
&
Wales
el
79
80
Government of India
Rajan Sharma
eH fafà/ DOB 27/12/1979
64/Male
5159 4802 1255
Unique ldentification Authority of India

Address: SO: Ram Chand Sharma, VPO
Rehlu, Rihu Khas (52)., Rehlu, Kangra,
0gT, HTUd VT, 176206 Himachal Pradest, 176206
5159 4802 1255

Www
1947
help uidai.gov.in www.uidaigovin
1800 300 1947
81
Government oflnd
Issue
Date
28/09/2013
ARPNA SHARMA
HH Af/DOB. 16/07/1981
afe/Female
5321 5970 1823
Unique ldentification Authority of India

AADHAAR
176206
Address: W/O. Rajan Sharma, VPO

O Rehlu, Rihlu Khas (52),
Pradesh, 176206 Kangra, Himachal
5321 5970 1823

1947
help@uidai.go.in www.uidai.gov.in
82
83
Advocate terms of
which IN 9 7 6 4 3 named
above
The In
e: IN
And10. 5. him:
I. (herein HIMACHAL
PRADESH
KANGRA, SH.KNOW THE rSuit
WITNESS or To To review, To RAM THE
the thecase the by offor And purpose. all And and receipts
And sign progress To that
To subjects may payment To t he BRAHM
the
have original refund me/us
prosecution hearings
the his appoint withdraw
take file sign same act, after ALLSTATE Appeals /
fees.
the I/We I/We I/We authority
I/We the may be CHANDER COURT
and Advocate and
result substitute
been power execution
hereof
and
revision, file, appear
deemed to of called to
WHERE above
undersigned undersigned the arise may
of to undersigned take
payment fees
DATTwhom (NCT
fee and and or verify No. OF
understood the be of undersigned hereby in
of and be by
shall Court. of paid which the
instruct thcompromise
e touching back separately and
withdrawal, SHARMA
OF
same will attorney
in necessary triedadvocate/s) Office: PETITIONERNO. 1 AGEDthese
OF the proceedings,
course to and plead
be said inform the of Maven DELHI)
to he conferred documents,
do ADVNIHITDALMIAa EMAIL: HON'
I/We paid I/We do that fees present or GMAIL.COM NIHIT present CRL,
M.C.BLE
in said the do
shallcase. matter or D/2877/2015
ENROLMENT NO.: ABOUT
by any hereby on any all heard in 1688, &
case hereby do of in for or for
me/us doagain hereby advocate theI/We other any thcompromise e the Legal &sORS.
case receive The hereby our other the each each to DALMIA
here until Advocate upon to said pleadings, proper above-noted and 9350720673; PHONE:
shall ORS. HIGH
asprosecution
to be 77
agree agree or behalf.
my/our actsmanner
deposit, GF, LLP-
whatsoever byagree adjournment
Legal admit court also my/our YEARS
on case stage. ADVOCATES
unto me/us. remaining the and my/our agree the OUTRAM appoint:
herebydo come
this that and for COURT
in VERSUS
that same
not for
Advocate relating or by Advocates &
set retain Practitioner or and appeals
the that
appearance own to things draw other th e Advocate
12th in toduly
of submit me/us. case JEEVESH R/O
my/our and once is the hold ratify prosecution /or appellate
unpaid th e I/ 12023 OF
day for
costs LANE,
paid authorised acts,whenever which
and to petitions
deny
cross-objections in VILLAGE We
ifthe event
himself. the and said this DELHI
of the as receive the to in &
hand fee up. whenever authorising arbitration
October heof advocatewhen confirm case. said the court court the Consultants
NEW
case if may MEHTA SH.
isThe the done documents of or above-noted
AT
to paid, shall he money, case. affidavits
prolongs fee agent
th e be th e including or DELHI REHLU, RAM NEW
these wholeordered
2023 be or byall maynecessary in
settled
1/We case him any said
entitled his would me/us acts
cheques,
or any CHAND DELHT
presents or think petitions
accepted for substitute is or 110009 P.S.:
by done to differences of case
High other case
will is part called. opposite other
appear exercise fit
more not only to to SHAHIPUR,
SHAMRA
the
to of the
by to be in CourtCourt authorises .RESPONDENTS
withdraw the court all case documents for PETITIONERS .
subject than beor the do done all
contents entitled responsible intents
in or executions
Client the fee sothe and party. its subject in
3 agreed shall court Advocate disputes S/O
to and
power grant for stages which
years abovefrom DIST.
84
and th e LT.
the of for be on to as to
Advocate terrns
which IN 10. 9. 8. 7. 6. 5. 4. 3. 2. (herein
1. him: HIMACHAL
KANGRA, In
re
namcd
aboveThe DIST. RAMSH.KNOWALL toTHE Apprals
Sut NoIN
WITNESS And of for And purpose.
all And or
And Sign progress
and To
receipts To
that To
subjects To review,
may payrment To RAM THE
the thecase the by To the
of
have the hearings
th e his appoint withdraw
take file sign act, STATE
prosEcution
origËnal
refund rme/usI/We 1/We authority
I/We the may sarne after
the and Advocate I/We Substitute be CHANDER COURT
result power execution
and revision,
appear CHAND
been hereof
and arise deerned to file, of called
fees.WHERE above
undersigned undersigned
to undersigned the take may
and paynent whom
these (NCT
fee of be and in or verify fees OF
understood th e of undersigned hereby be
of touching
thcomprornise
e and back Separately and by SHARMA
shall Court. of paid which the will
attorney instruct withdrawal,
necessary PETITIONER SHARMA OF
sarme in proceedings, tried advocate/s) Office:
OF the course to and plead
be saidinform the Maven DELHI) CRL.
to he conferred docurnents, oí ADVNIHITDALMIA@
do fees present orGMAIL.COM EMAIL: NIHIT HON'
M.C.BLE
I/We paid I/We in said the do do that matter or D/2877/2015
ENROLMENT NO.: present shall
by shall case. any all heard in 1688, PRADESH ABOUT
AGED &
any casEhereby hereby doon of in foT or for
advocate theI/We other any thCormpromise e the Legal &ORS.
me/us doagain hereby case hereby our other the each each to DALMIA NO. 0RS.
here
receiveAdvocate The as to proper
pleadings, and HIGH
until upon said to
above-noted 9350720673; PHONE:
be
agree agree or behalf.
prosecution manner
deposit,
acts GF,
whatsoever byagree adjournment my/our Legal admit me/us.
courtby also my/our LLP- 2
on my/our case stage. ADVOCATES comethatI/ CoURT
untome/us. remaining the and agree the fo r OUTRAM
this that and do VERSUS
that same
not for or in Advocates && YEARSR/0 73
set retain Advocate
Practitioner relatng orand appeals
e
thother the Advocate hereby
12th appearance
in to duBy own to thingsdrawsubImit case JEEVESH
my/our ratify of /or OF
and once is the hold th e prosecution appeilate 12023
unpaid for
costs acts, and petitions in LANE, appoint:
day paid authorised which to deny
cross-objections DELHI
ifthe event
himselí. the whenever
and said this SMT.We
of th e as receive the to in &
hand whenever authorising arbitration the
October fee up. he advocatewhen confirm courtcourt the Consultants
DELHI
NEW MEHTA
of if case. mav said
VILLAGE AT
case The
isshall the done documents of or above-noted case
to paid, he money, case. afidavits NEW
agent
the be the inchuding or
these prolongs fee whole PREM
LATA
2023 beordered or byall maynecessarv in
settled
I/We case him any said or DELHI
entitled hi s would me/us acts any REHLU,P.S.:
presents or think cheques, petitions
accepted for will substitute is to differences of case or Highother 110009
is part by
called. done opposite other
appear to exercise fit to
more not only to the in RESPONDENTS
of case
be Court authorises SHARMA PETITIONERS
the withdraw all by to documents for Court
subject than be for th e court the do al l
contents intents
in done or executions SHAHPUR,
Client entitled the responsible fee sothe and party. its subject in
court Advocate disputes
for
85
3 agreed shall stages

to vears abovefrom andpower grant which W/O
and the
the of for be on to as to
86
IN THE COURT OF HON'BLE HIGH cOURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Suit / Appcals No CRL. M.C. 12023
In re
VERSUS
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. RESPONDENTS
KNOW ALL t0 whomn these present shall come that I / We MR. CHANDAN SHARMA S/O SH.
RAM CHAND SHARMA RÍO ABOUT 42 YEARS RÍo 86. BRIGHTSIDE AVENUE, STAINES
OPON-THAMES, TW181 NO, UNITED KINGDOM THROUGH ATTORNEY SH, RAM CHAND
SHARMA, THROUGH ATTORNEY SH. RAM CHAND SHARMA
The above named PETITIONER NO. 3 do hereby appoint:
NIHIT DALMA & JEEVESH MEHTA
ADVOCATES
ENROLMENT NO.: D/2877/2015
Maven Legal LLP- Adyocates & Consultants
Office: 1688, GF, OUTRAM LANE, NEW DELHI 110009
PHONE: 9350720673;
EMAIL: ADVNIHITDALMIA@GMAIL.COM
(herein
him:
after called by advocate/s) to be my/ our Advocate in the above-noted case authorises
1. To act, appear and plead in the above-noted case in this court or in any other Court in which
the same may be tried or heard and also in the appellate court incuding High Court subject to
payment of fees separately for each court by me/us.
2. To sign file, verify and present pleadings, appeals cross-objections or petitions for executions
review, revision, withdrawal, compromise or other petitions or affidavits or other documents as
may be deemed necessary or proper for the prosecution of the said case in all its stages
subjects to payment of fees for each stage.
3. To file and take back documnents, to admit and /or deny the
4. documents of opposite party.
To withdraw or comnpromise the said case or subrmit to arbitration any differences or disputes
that may arise touching or in any manner relating to the said case.
5. To take execution proceedings, to deposit, draw and
receive
receipts hereof and to do all other acts and things which maymoney, cheques, case and grant
be necessary to be done for the
progress and in the course of the prosecution of the said case.
6. To appoint and instruct any other Legal Practitioner
authorising him to exercise the power
and authority hereby conferred upon the Advocate whenever he may think fit to do so and to
sign the power of attorney on our behalf.
7. And I/We the undersigned do hereby agree to ratify and
or his substitute in the matter as my/our own actS, asconfirm all acts done by the Advocate
if done by me/us to all intents and
purpose.
8. And I/We undersigned that l/We or my/our duly
authorised
all hearings and will inform the Advocate for appearance when agent would
the case appear in court on
is called.
9. And 1/We undersigned do hereby agree not to hold the
advOcate or his substitute responsible
for the result of the said case. The adjournment costs whenever
of the Advocate which he shall receive and retain for himself. ordered by the court shall be
10. And I/We undersigned do hereby agree that in the event of the whole or
by me/us to be paid to the advocate remaining unpaid he shall be entitled parttoofwithdraw
the fee agreed
from
the prosecution of the said case until the sarme is paid up. The fee settled is only for the above
case and above Court. I/We hereby agree that once the fee is paid, I/We will not be entitled for
the refund of the same in any case whatsoever and if the case prolongs for more than 3 vears
the original fee shall be paid again by me/us.
IN WITNESS WHERE OF I/We do here unto set my/our hand to these presents the contents of
which have been understood by me/us on this 12th day of October 2023 accepted subject to the
terms of the fees.
Advocate Client
87
IN THE COURT OF HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Suit /Appeals No. CRL, M.C. 12023
In re:
VERSUS
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. .RESPONDENTS
KNOW ALL to whom these present shall come that /We MR. RAJAN SHARMAS/0 SH, RAM
CHAND SHARMA R/O VILLAGE REHLU, P.S.: SHAHPUR, DIST. KANGRA, HIMACHAL
PRADESH
Theabove namcd PETITIONER NO. 4 do hereby appoint:
ADVOCATES
Maven Legal LLP- Advocates & Consultants
Office: 1688, GF, OUTRAM LANE, NEW DELHI 110009
PHONE: 9350720673;
(herein after called by advocate/s) to be my/our Advocate in the above-noted case authorises
him:
1. To act, appear and plead in the above-noted case in this court or in any other Court in which
the same may be tried or heard and also in the appellate court including High Court subject to
payment of fees separately for cach court by me/us.
2. To sign file, verify and present pleadings, appeals cross-objections or petitions for executions
review, revision, withdrawal, compromise or other petitions or affidavits or other documents as
subjects to payment of fees for each stage.
3. To file and take back documents, to admit and /or deny the documents of opposite party.
4. To withdraw or compromise the said case or submit to arbitration any differences or disputes
5. To take execution proceedings, to deposit, draw and receive money, cheques, case and grant
receipts hereof and to do all other acts and things which may be necessary to be done for the
6. To appoint and instruct any other Legal Practitioner authorising him to exercise
and authority hereby conferred upon the Advocate whenever he may think fit to do the power
so and to
7. And I/We the undersigned do hereby agree to ratify and confirm all acts
doneto allthe
or his substitute in the matter as my/our own acts, as if done by me/us
by Advocate
intents and
purpose.
8. And I/We undersigned that I/We or my/our duly authorised agent would appear in court on
all hearings and will inform the AdvOcate for appearance when the case is called.
9. And I/We undersigned do hereby
agree not to hold the advocate or his
for the result of the said case. The adjournment costs whenever orderedsubstitute responsible
by the court shall be
of the Advocate which he shall receive and retain for himself.
10. And I/We undersigned do hereby agree that in the event of the whole or part of
the fee agreed
by me/us to be paid to the advocate remaining unpaid he shall be entitled to withdraw from
the prosecution of the said case until the same is paid up. The fee settled is only for the above
the refund of the same in any case whatsoever and if the case prolongs for
more than 3 years
IN WITNESS WHERE OF I/We do here unto set my/our hand to these presents the contents of
which have been understood by me/us on this 12th day of October 2023 accepted subject to the
terms of the fees.
Advocate Client
88
IN THE COURT OF HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Suit / Appcals No. CRL, M.C. 12023
In re:
VERSUS
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) &ORS. ...RESPONDENTS
KNOW ALL to whom these present shall come that I / We MRS, ARPNA SHARMA W/O MR.
RAJAN SHARMA R/O VÍLLAGE REHLU, P.S.: SHAHPUR, DIST. KANGRA, HIMACHAL
PRADESH
The above narmed PETITIONER NO, 5 do hereby appoint:
NIHIT D LMIA & JEEVESH MEHTA
ADVOCATES
Maven Legal LLP. Advocates & Consultants
Ofice: 1688, GF, oUTRAM LANE, NEW DELHI 110009
PHONE: 9350720673;
(herein after called by advocate/s) to be my/our Advocate in the above-noted case authorises
him:
1 To act, appear and plead in the above-noted case in this court or in any other Court in which
the same may be tried or heard and also in the appellate court including High Court subject to
payment of fees separately for each court by me/us.
2
To sign ile, verify and present pleadings, appeals cross-objections or petitions for executions
review, revision, withdrawal, compromise or other petitions or affidavits or other docurnents as
subjects to paynment of fees for each stage.
3. To file and take back documents, to admit and /or deny the documents of opposite party.
4. To withdraw or compromise the said case or submit to arbitration any differences or disputes
5. To take execution proceedings, to deposit, draw and receive money, cheques, case and grant
receipts hereof and to do all other acts and things which may be necessary to be done for the
6. To appoint and instruct any other Legal Practitioner authorising him to exercise the power
and authority hereby conferred upon the Advocate whenever he may think fit to do so and to
7. And I/We the undersigned do hereby agree to ratify and confirm all acts done by the Advocate
or his substitute in the matter as my/our own acts, as if done by me/us to all intents and
purpose.
8. And I/We undersigned that I/We or my/our duly
authorised
all hearings and will inform the Advocate for appearance when agent would
the case appear in court on
is called.
9. And I/We undersigned do hereby agree not to hold the advocate or his
for the result of the said case. The adjournment costs whenever substitute responsible
of the Advocate which he shall receive and retain for himself.
ordered by the court shall be
10. And I/We undersigned do hereby agree that in the event of the whole or part of the
fee agreed
by me/us to be paid to the advocate remaining unpaid he shall be entitled to withdraw from
the prosecution of the said case until the same is paid up. The fee settled is only for the above
the refund of the same in any case whatsoever and if the case prolongs for more than 3 years
IN WITNESS WHERE OF I/We do here unto set my/our hand to these
presents the contents of
which have beern understood by me/us on this 12th day of October 2023 accepted subject to the
terms of the fees.
Advocate Clint
10/13/23, 11:46 AM Gmail - CRL. M.C. OF 2023
89
Vinod Thakur <vinodadlo@gmail.com>
CRL. M.C. OF 2023

1 message
Vinod Thakur <vinodadlo@gmail.com> Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 11:46 AM

To: "Office of the Standing Counsel (Criminal)" <dhcprosecutiondelhipolice@gmail.com>
IN THE MATTER OF:

VERSUS
--
VINOD KUMAR THAKUR
(DELHI HIGH COURT)
Quashing PDF.pdf
22318K
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=82c79c71f7&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-859562652556756891&simpl=msg-a:r-86452010220… 1/1

Quashing PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

Quashing PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Quashing PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CRL. M.C. OF 2023

IN THE MATTER OF:

RAM CHANDER SHARMA & ORS. ….PETITIONERS

THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. …RESPONDENTS

SR. NO. PARTICULARS PAGE NO.

8 Affidavit in support. 18-27

10 Affidavit in support 30-39

Drawn and filed by:

NIHIT DALMIA & JEEVESH MEHTA

CRL. M.C. OF 2023

IN THE MATTER OF:

RAM CHANDER SHARMA & ORS. ….PETITIONERS

THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. …RESPONDENTS

16.10.2023 This is for your information and record. Please take

Drawn and filed by:

NIHIT DALMIA & JEEVESH MEHTA

:: Online Payment Acknowledgement

Online Reference No DLOCF10359207652861023125826

This is a system generated receipt.

CRL. M.C. OF 2023

IN THE MATTER OF:

RAM CHANDER SHARMA & ORS. ….PETITIONERS

THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. …RESPONDENTS

SUB: URGENT PETITION

Would you kindly be pleased to treat the accompanying petition as an

of Delhi. The grounds of urgency are:

“That the matter has been amicably settled between

Drawn and filed by:

NIHIT DALMIA & JEEVESH MEHTA

CRL. M.C. OF 2023

IN THE MATTER OF:

RAM CHANDER SHARMA & ORS. ….PETITIONERS

THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. …RESPONDENTS

F.I.R. No.: 97/2016

U/S: 498A/420/406/313/504/506 IPC &

P.S.: CIVIL LINE, ALLAHABAD (NOW PRAYAGRAJ)

1. SH. RAM CHAND SHAMRA (FATHER-IN-LAW)

2. SMT. PREM LATA SHARMA (MOTHER-IN-LAW)

3. MR. CHANDAN SHARMA (HUSBAND)

4. MR. RAJAN SHARMA (BROTHER-IN-LAW/JAITH)

5. MRS. ARPNA SHARMA (SISTER-IN-LAW/JAITHANI)

1. THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

3. MS. APRAJITA TRIPATHI (WIFE)

PETITION UNDER SECTION 482 OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE

SEEKING TO INVOKE THE INHERENT POWERS OF THE HON’BLE

HIGH COURT AND PRAYING INTER ALIA FOR QUASHING OF THE

F.I.R. No. 97/2016, P.S.: CIVIL LINES, ALLAHABAD (NOW

PRAYAGRAJ) UTTAR PRADESH, U/S: 498A/420/406/313/504/506

PROCEEDINGS/INVESTIGATION ARISING OUT OF THE SAID F.I.R.

Drawn and filed by:

NIHIT DALMIA & JEEVESH MEHTA

CRL. M.C. OF 2023

IN THE MATTER OF:

RAM CHANDER SHARMA & ORS. ….PETITIONERS

THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. …RESPONDENTS

original. That nothing has been added or subtracted during

Drawn and filed by:

NIHIT DALMIA & JEEVESH MEHTA