MARIANO CU UNJIENG, GUILLERMO A. CU UNJIENG and CU
UNJIENG e HIJOS, petitioners, vs. JUAN POSADAS, Collector of Internal Revenue, SOTERO RODAS, First Assistant Fiscal of the City of Manila, SERAFIN P. HILADO, Solicitor-General, and LEONARD S. GODDARD, Judge of First Instance of Manila, respondents.
Duran, Lim & Tuason, for petitioners.
C. A. DeWitt and the respondents for the latter.
SYLLABUS
1. EVIDENCE; INCOME TAX RETURNS; HOW PRODUCIBLE IN COURT. —
Income tax returns are producible in court in conformity with Regulations (No. 33) relating to inspection of income tax returns. 2. ID.; ID.; INSPECTION. — The word "inspection", as used in section 11 of said Regulations, is not to be interpreted in a narrow or technical sense. It includes the exhibition of the income tax returns in court. 3. ID.; ID.; USE IN CRIMINAL CASES. — Within the meaning of the Regulations above mentioned, a criminal case prosecuted by the Government in the name of the People is a sort of case in which the Government, as corporate representative of all society, is interested.
DECISION
STREET, J : p
This is a petition for the writ of prohibition presented by Mariano Cu