Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 1
Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION
PROBLEM PROFILE
The concern of the present study revolves around the protection of Intellectual
Property in India and at international level. The special refence is made to protection
of Trademarks and that also Well-known Trademarks in India. Intellectual Property
is a product of human ideas or expression, which is protected by law. Ideas and
expression of human intellect can take different shapes as it can emerge in the form of
inventions, literature, artistic expression, method of doing business etc., and in legal
parlance they are called as intellectual property, which is classified in different forms
as patents, copyrights, industrial designs, geographical indications, trademarks, trade
secrets etc. They have the capacity to influence business course of any enterprise due
to which they are of immense economic value but they do not exist in physical nature
hence are termed as intangible assets. Another unique feature of the intellectual
properties is that they are not bound by any territories, thus require transborder
protection. The analysis of the present study ranges from understanding the meaning
of Intellectual Property and its rights. “Why there is necessity to protect Intellectual
Property?” and “How the Intellectual Property rights were recognized and developed
through centuries?”, is one of the fields of present research. The study also focuses on
the fact that the intellectual properties lack territorial jurisdictions boundaries and
requires global comprehensive protection. It has been observed that despite having
various international organisations working for overall development and protection of
intellectual properties but it is only through Paris Convention that some breakthrough
had come where consensus had arrived between various international powers for
protection of intellectual properties beyond territorial jurisdictions of member states.
The Paris Convention was established in 1883 and it still holds good after more than a
century and is conceptual force behind all the international treaties which had
formulated after it. The present research also intends to examine the impact of
international organisations and treaties on protection of intellectual properties. The
effect of World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) on enforcing principles of
Paris Convention, WTO-TRIPS agreement (World Trade Organisation-Trade Related
Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights), Madrid Agreement and Protocol. These
international treaties have been identified as the binding forces which are actively
working for development and protection of intellectual properties in developed as
well as developing countries.
“Marks” developed gradually over the centuries and as they facilitate trading
hence are now termed as “Trademarks”. Markings may be indicative of attributes
other than source, such as quality, type, fitness of purpose, compliance with standards
or endorsements. They are widely used to identify a source of services and to
promote repeat business. Popularity of a trademark brings with it lot of business for
the enterprise but at the same time imitations/ replications of the famous marks throng
markets, which effect the sales. Having assisted a main Counsel for Heinz Italia for a
short time, in the dispute pertaining to trademark Glucon-D belonging to Heinz Italia
and Glucose-D by Dabur at Punjab and Haryana High Court. The dispute was that
Glucon-D was well established product having turn over of 50 crores but Dabur
launched phonetically similar Glucose-D with similar get up and colour combination
which adversely effected the market share of Heinz Italia. The interim injunction was
rejected by competent court at Gurgaon( now Gurugram) and then by Punjab and
Haryana High Court but it was allowed by Supreme Court in case no. Appeal (Civil)
2756 of 2007 but by that time Dabur had already discarded the pack. It created my
interest in the field which prompted me to research the status of trademarks in India.
The research aims to understand the development of Trademarks law in India since
British regime till now in order to understand as to how Indian law had kept pace with
changing business practices and international scenario. One of the area of concern at
international level was protection of Well-known Trademarks, which was
acknowledged way back in 1883, when Paris convention was adopted but at that time
India was under the British rule and was lacking independent identity. No statutory
recognition of intellectual properties was available in India. But problems like
violations in the form of infringement, passing off etc were prevalent in India also but
in the absence of any dedicated law for protection of Trademarks, the remedies were
resolved through Specific Relief Act, 1877 and provisions of IPC. Afterwards during
British rule, India had got comprehensive law in the shape of Indian Trademarks Act
1940. On independence, the Indian government took into account the modernised
business practices and Trademark and Merchandise Marks Act 1958 was enacted but
after accession to TRIPS agreement, India had enacted Trademarks Act 1999, which
came into force on 15 September 2003. It provided for definition as well as elaborate
protection for well-known trademarks. The obligations of Registrar to register Well-
known Trademarks is well defined in the Act along with the duty to protect well-
known trademarks from similarly deceptive trademarks by refusing their registration.
Through present study, the range and limits of protection of Well-known Trademarks
in India will be investigated. The research will also examine various judgements
passed by the authorities and judicial courts to understand as to how this protection is
interpreted in actual disputes.
OBJECTS OF THE STUDY
To find what was the necessity to enforce the Trademarks Act 1999?
RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS
The Trademark law, which had evolved in India is in conformity with the obligations
imposed by Paris Convention and TRIPs. The Trade Marks Act 1999 is a major step
for protection of Indian trademarks as well as protection of well-known Indian and
International trade marks. Section 11 of the Act deals with Well-Known Trade Marks.
It provides for conditions under which a trade mark becomes a well-known trade
mark but it fails to take into account that in practical application the criteria of well-
known trademarks cannot be fitted in some air tight compartments. The question
whether the mark has achieved status of well-known trade mark is a fact-sensitive
inquiry which will depend upon facts of each case and would vary between industries,
products and service sectors as well as complexity of the markets. Some products
could have special circumstances, which need to be considered separately. Ambiguity
has also been added as Section 11 (10) provides that Registrar need to protect a well-
known trademark at his own, but section 11 (5) provides that registration cannot be
refused unless on the objections by the opposition. This, in turn, would mean that the
Registrar is confronted with a paradox of its own kind. Another field, which has
been left, untouched by the Trade Marks Act 1999 is in connection with domain
names. The operation of the Act is not extra-territorial and therefore it does not
provide adequate protection for domain name.
In India Intellectual Property Appellate Board has been constituted for protection and
regulation of Intellectual Properties, but Board cannot cater to the requirements and
settle disputes unless it comprises of technical experts from the specific field of trade
marks related with different kinds of products and services as the concept of trade
marks is subjective in nature. The need of the hour is an appraisal of the prevalent law
and procedure on trademarks so as to cater to the requirements of Indian markets and
Indian trademarks.
Based upon all of the above analysis, the researcher is acquainted with the scope and
areas of application of the trademark laws in India. After having this prior information
about the topic, the researcher is of the opinion that the possible conclusion to the
above analysis could be that the present laws related to Trademarks in India are not
adequate to provide a full-fledged protection to all kinds of marks or medium of
expressions and hence we need a more comprehensive law regarding it. Based upon
this opinion the researcher draws her hypothesis that :
The existing laws and legislations are not sufficient to give protection to a broad
spectrum of marks and hence Indian laws need reforms in order to incorporate new
concepts.
METHODOLOGY OF RESEARCH
For the purposes of this study, primary as well as secondary sources will be
used. The primary sources will include Data of Intellectual Properties Appellate
Board and Registrar Office, Legislative Acts, Newspapers of relevant years, Reports.
The secondary sources such as Books, Articles, Journals, Case Studies, personal
interviews with Trade Mark owners and consumers and material available at various
libraries. The proposed work is expected to be doctrinal methodology of research and
case study. The Research is both descriptive and analytical in nature i.e. it
incorporates both descriptive data and analysis of that data. Research is empirical as
well as it is based upon the observations of the researcher, from the society. The entire
study is divided into different chapters, each of which deals with an important concept
of Property Rights in India.
APPRAISAL OF LITERATURE
Before carrying out the research on the topic, the researcher had a faint idea about the
Trademarks and legislations protecting them. The researcher referred to numerous
sources which include books, bare provisions of legislations, newspaper articles,
online journals etc., detail of which shall be given below. Each of this sources has
added up to the knowledge of the researcher and has given an insight into the topic.
All these sources were very informative and enhanced the understanding of researcher
about the topic. In order to carry out a detailed research on the topic, it was necessary
to refer to these sources.
TRADEMARKS
In India, Section 2(zb) of The Trade Mark Act, 1999 defines Trade mark. It provides,
‘…“trade mark” means a mark capable of being represented graphically and which is
capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one person from those of others and
may include shape of goods, their packaging and combination of colours: and—
(i) in relation to Chapter XII (other than section 107), a registered trade
mark or a mark used in relation to goods or services for the purpose of
indicating or so as to indicate a connection in the course of trade
between the goods or services, as the case may be, and some person
having the right as proprietor to use the mark: and
3
Source http://www.businessgyan.com/content/view/623/220/ article written by Santhosh Vikram
Singh
4
Section 2(zb), TM Act 1999.
5
Making a Mark: An Introduction to Trademarks for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises, WIPO,
2003 ed., page 3
Having a designated Trademark makes for a lot of advantages for both the producer as
well the consumer in the market. It ensures for a healthy competitive market
environment that further adds to a thriving economy. Even marketing through means
of a Trademark becomes easier. Infact as an alternative to traditional means of
advertising, its way more cost friendly and effective, considering via means of a
Trademark, the consumers already recognize a product and are assured of its quality. 6
For the producers it promises an added advantage of consumer loyalty and continued
production. Distinctiveness and sales both are constantly maintained and there is a
higher chance of prevention of low quality goods to be supplied in the markets.
Further confusion amongst the buyers is avoided and the other producers in the
market are more aware and hence discouraged from producing/selling similar
products.7
Most producers prefer to place their Trademarks on the packaging through various
labels, boxes, covers, shapes etc.9 The immense economic value and the recognition
provided by Trademarking a product/service is the reason why most producers
6
Carl W Battle, Legal Forms for Everyone(5th edition, Allworth Communications Inc,2006)pg143
7
Article 16, TRIPS Agreement (Trade Related Aspects on Intellectual PropertyRights)
8
P.K. Vasudeva, World Trade Organization: Implications for Indian Economy(Pearson
Education,2005)pg169
9
Carl W Battle, Legal Forms for Everyone(5th edition, Allworth Communications Inc,2006) pg145
normally prefer to register their marks. This is also the reason why most of the
jurisdictions have developed laws around its protection.
One common misconception that is ought to occur is the confusion between brand
names and Trademarks. A brand is not specifically a legal name. It is merely a name
selected to recognize the product/service with. It’s known as a “memory heuristic”,
with which a consumer can easily and conveniently remember the product/service.
Whereas, a Trademark is more of a commercial source of the product. It’s known as
the “badge of origin.” It’s the part of the brand that is legally protected and
recognized.
More often, a brand may be associated with the vision, personality, culture, repute of
the company as a whole. Whereas a Trademark is associated more with the
company’s product, its packaging, its colour, its utility to the consumer, etc. Further,
there is no limitation on the length of use of a brand name but for a Trademark to be
in continuous usage, needs to be registered and this registration period renewed from
time to time.
A person may buy a product due to either of the two. Both the brand and Trademark
at the end of the day have a capacity of leaving an impression on its consumers and
hence determines the goodwill in the market. 12 Companies therefore work on both of
them in the market. For instance, Apple as a brand is preferred by the consumers in
10
P.K. Vasudeva, World Trade Organization: Implications for Indian Economy(Pearson
Education,2005)pg169
11
Ronald Hildret, Siegrun Kane Trademark Law(4th edition, Practising Law Institute,2002)pg2
12
Vinod Sople, Managing Intellectual Property(PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd,2006) pg104
India because it signifies a higher status, where as Apple as a Trademark is preferred
because of its distinct features such as an efficient IOS working surface or a fine
display as compared to other gadgets and its competitors in the market.
Creating an identity for a product is one of the most important functions as well as
features of a Trademark. It not only builds an easy recognition but also builds on a
consumer confidence in the products and services.13 To illustrate, the mobile and
internet service of JIO was brought in on the existing repute and identity of the
proprietor and supplier, Reliance.
One of the famous legal battles in this regard that went up to 20 years was Amul v.
Anul. Herein the court granted an injunction against Shri Shakti Dairy and Kuldeep
Enterprises for infringement of Trademark of Co-operative Milk Producers Union
Ltd. According to the reasoning used by the court, manufacturing of goods under the
titles “Anul Shakti” and “Anul Taaza” were greatly analogous to Amul’s original
13
Narayan. P, Intellectual PropertyLaw (3rd Ed. 2017, Eastern Law House, New Delhi), p.147.
trade names and were likely to cause confusion in the minds of consumers and hence
could not be allowed.14
For instance, Tata is one of the most influential and successful companies in India
which has tremendous goodwill and trust of consumers in the market which has
ensured that consumers can blindly trust the products manufactured by them. This
would have been impossible to achieve without a protected Trademark.
A registered user under any jurisdiction has a legal recognition attached with the
exclusive ownership and manufacturing of the said product or service. It further
secures the right legally giving the proprietor a legal remedy incase somebody
infringes upon this exclusive right.
The Supreme Court has on multiple occasions reiterated that exclusive rights are
attached with registration of the Trademarks, one only the registered user enjoys. One
such case is that of Ramdev Foods Products Pvt. Ltd. v. Arvind bai Rambai Patel
Pvt. Ltd.,15 wherein the Honourable Court noted the above in regards to exclusivity of
rights in relation to Trademarks under Section 28 of the Indian Trademarks Act.
Manufacturers shoulder the responsibility to ensure that the product maintains the
quality the Trademark attaches with a product. There are many quality standards and
systems followed in various jurisdictions to ensure that only best quality products are
provided to the customers. Some of the major brands like Apple, Samsung, Levis,
14
“India: 20-year-old legal battle between Amul and Anul finally concludes”, available at;
https://www.mondaq.com/india/Trademark/729150/20-year-old-legal-battle-between-amul-and-anul-
finally-concludes , accessed on 02.12.2020, 1504 hrs.
15
[Appeal (Civil) 8815-8816 of 3003. Civil Appeal no. 8817 of 2003 SCC]
PwC, etc spend significant amounts on R&D to ensure that these quality standards are
maintained.
Inherently, Trademarks have the quality of advertising for he said product. Since it’s
the mark through which customer recognises the brand name/the product/ the service
provided, mere pictorial representation is sometimes enough to advertise in the
market. For eg. The rings of audi have been registered Trademark for the company.
Similarly the specific shade of blue has been registered by dairy milk for chocolate
wrappers.
Designation[edit]
f) Valuable assets- Material tangible property has always been in the centre of
an individual’s concern and history of human civilisation is of its struggle for
property. Valuable assets for individuals have been Land, Home, money etc.
but now with coming up of the concept of Intellectual Property, it has been
observed that it is amongst the most precious possession of a person.
Trademarks not only have a creative value attached to it, they are highly
economic in nature and are backbone commercial competitive economy. They
are the key to the prosperity of a business, Licensing the Trademarks, earning
Royalties, expansion of businesses, optimum use of goodwill in a business etc.
are few activities that have modernised the economic sphere and raising value
of these Trademarks and making them one of the most valuable assets of an
Individual.
q) Quality products- every time a new idea appears, it becomes more commercial
and profitable which makes it important for others to come up with new ideas
as well. The new idea always focus towards improving the quality of product
so that more and more consumers are attracted towards it, thereby the entire
exercise leads to improvement of quality of products which becomes
beneficial for the consumers in the long run as now they start getting products
with improved quality at the same price.
r) Essential Advertising- Trademark when gets advertised by means of different
platforms form a link between the manufacturer of the product and the actual
service provider. The consumers also become a part of this chain after getting
the knowledge of a product from these advertisements. All of this becomes
beneficial for the brand that owns the Trademark as now by way of
advertisement and use of Trademark in this advertisement their Trademark
becomes known to large section of society, they don’t have to now advocate
about the features of their product. The Trademark itself ensures the increase
in popularity of the product.
TRADEMARKS
CONVENTIONAL NON-CONVENTIONAL
TRADEMARK TRADEMARK
As mentioned earlier, marks were used by human civilizations from the very
beginning of time to signify ownership in one form or another. Whereas one of the
first instances of its remains can be found amongst the Roman and Greek
civilizations. Early documentation by historians depicts clay pots and utensils were
amongst a few other articles that were most commonly marked by the hands of the
potter making them. More often than not were marked by “x” or stars which were
eventually in time replaced by marks recognized with the regions, their monarchs,
their tribes, etc. Even initial civilizations to settle in the Indian subcontinent were
known to follow these practices.
The main motive behind all these marks were basically commercial interests and easy
in trade, since economies more or less depended mainly upon barter systems. Having
marks on products ensured that products could be traced back to their originators and
their values could be determined better for purposes of exchange.
In documentation, the Trademark law may be traced back in origin to 1266, usually
known as the Bakers Marking Law. The law required bakers to place a mark on the
loaves of bread that was sold, identifying the baker by their bread. 17 Any bread sold
unstamped was confiscated and was not allowed to be sold. An officer known as the
“officer of abundance” was specifically designated for this purpose and would fine
defaulting bakers with heavy damages that were then paid to the state.18
Since bread and bear were most commonly used food items in gatherings and
breaking bread together was known as a sign of hospitality and camaraderie, the laws
surrounding food items like beer and bread were one of the most important in the
history of Trademarks. They laid down uniform standards acceptable in the societies.
For instance, in old England, there existed a common measures of king by which the
entire realm did trades. These were further tradable in English pennies/ sterlings on
previously decided prices. For example, one sterling pound could buy two wheat
corns without clipping. Similarly, eight pounds made a gallon of wine. 19 Other such
measurements and price ranges were fixed by the king for other food products as well.
Barter was allowed too on pre-decided values. One could exchange farmed goods for
other essentials.
One of the earlier enactments hence revolved around food and essentials. Section 38
of Usages of Winchester, (antedating to 1275), required every baker and brewer to
17
Aaron Schwabach, Intellectual Property(ABC-CLIO,2007) p.9.
18
E Stalley,The Guilds of Florence(2nd edition) pg.440:G Lastig pg28
19
Davies, Charles. The Metric System, Considered with Reference to Its Introduction Into the United
States. A. S. Barnes and Company. 1871.
stamp his bread and wine barrels. 20 These marks were generally recognized by the
local officer and were made with items easily found like wood, metal, etc and were
easily recognizable designs, markings or simple names.
Human creations and innovations have existed from the starting of the time. Their
forms may have developed and changed over time, but to own, create and protect its
own is the basic human instinct. Initially humans created basic necessities such as
ornaments, utensils, vessels, hunting arms, etc. Eventually with developing societies
and emergence of religion and spirituality, figurines of god also began to come in
production. All this while each of these things were marked in some form or the other
by the producers for various purposes ranging from ownership, identification to
differentiation and protection.21 Even though the mode or marking and types of marks
and their products changed overtime with development of mankind, the purposes of
affixing these marks has more or less remained the same throughout across the history
of all cultures.
As is common in principle even till date, the more a Trademark comes to be known
among people, the more it inspires confidence in the goods and services of that
particular seller in the market22. When a mark is placed over a product, it signifies
ownership and it is meant that any other third party other than the manufacturer does
not have any right over it unless until it is granted specifically. In a large way that also
helps deter people with other vested interests.
In the middle ages one could variably find two basic kinds of marks:-
1. Merchants Mark
20
J S Furley ,City Government of Winchester from the records of xiv and xv centuries, p82
21
Michel SOLIS, Votre PME et le Droit, 2e éd., Les Éditions Transcontinental inc.,
Montréal, 1994, 136 p., p. 96.
22
Siegrun D. KANE, Trademark Law, A Practitioner Guide, 1989, Supplement, Practising Law
Institute, New York, 1989, p. 9-10.
Ownership was indicated through “Merchants Mark” whereas the “Production Mark”
signified the origin of the said product. Mostly, production marks were commonly
used by huge traders’ guilds to guarantee quality, product standardisation and to
control new entry into a particular trade.23 One of the first widely recognized use of
Trademarks were in the form engraving used to names ships. So that in case of ship
wreckages, identification would be possible. Other than that only the people doing
businesses in guilds started asserting Merchants mark on their goods as a way of
status symbol. For obvious reasons it provided them with the much needed leverage
over the market.
Merchant Marks were found to be in existence in the 10th century, was affixed to
goods to enable the owner to distinguish his goods besides proving ownership rights
on goods which were found missing from acts of piracy, shipwrecks and other natural
calamities. Besides, as a measure to curb defective goods, sword manufacturers were
required to use certain marks on their goods to identify defective weapons. Marking
on the goods served dual purpose, both of ownership as well as punishment, for
defective goods.24
2. Production Mark
During the 14th and 15th century, production marks were affixed by merchant and
craft guilds in their goods to differentiate inferior low quality ones. A repository of
goodwill among Guilds was created, who would do policing to remove defective
goods in the market. With the help of production marks, the consumers could easily
identify and assign responsibility for inferior goods, such as goods that may have
lacked in weight, quality materials, inferior craftsmanship etc. 25 This served a dual
purpose, to prevent counterfeiting of goods and remove defective goods.
Marking on the goods was made mandatory and as the marks were affixed out of
compulsion (as against self-interest), they came to be known as Police marks. Guilds
using false marks on their products were punished. Thus marks served an important
economic function: they enabled manufacturers to develop reputations for quality and
23
Ashwani KR Bansal, Law of Trademarks in India, Commercial Law Publishers(2001)pg 21
24
Plasticolor Molded Products v. Ford Motor Co., 713 F. Supp. 1329 (C.D. Cal. 1989)
25
Srinivasan Sruthi; Evolution of Trademark laws in India;
http://www.altacit.com/pdf/evolutionofTrademarklawsin_india.pdf accessed on 18.11.20 at 16:50 hrs
assured customers that products sold under the manufacturer’s brand will live up to
that reputation.
During the East India Company regime, the guild system started to disintegrate and
free trading was recognized. Marks which used to designate ownership became
‘symbol of quality’ and compulsion soon got replaced with ‘necessity’ to affix
Trademarks on the goods and served dual purpose, i.e. ownership and also prevention
of counterfeit. One of the earliest cases/legal conflicts on improper use of a
Trademark occurred in 1618 in Southern v. How26, where a Trademark on clothing
was deceived to a customer who bought defendant’s truncated grade clothing on the
pretext that it was the plaintiff’s brand. This case was the start of the journey on the
law on passing off as known in modern law. Due to increase in the cases of deceit,
armorers’, metal workers, papermakers, printers, weaves, smiths and all others used
Trademarks in their goods.
26
Tort on Passing Off; Project Assignment for Law of Torts. | Law Teacher;
http://www.lawteacher.net/business-law/essays/tort-of-passing-off-project-assignment-lawessays.
php#ftn21 accessed on 19.11.2020 at 11:20 hrs
27
UNCTAD, on Trademark, pg2
Trademark makes a reputation with the consumer who make his choice after
continuous use of the product and therefore assume that this is the quality of the
product and hence expects the same standard for each product, irrespective of the fact
that where the product is made or by whom. Hence, a Trademark creates a “phantom
manufacturer” who through assembly-line production and modern technology ensures
that goods of uniform quality are made available to the consumer time and again,
unfailingly. But this perception is notional as Trademark law does not require the
proprietor to maintain any particular or declared quality but to maintain the quality is
itself in the interest of the firm as it will effect the goodwill of the brand. The concept
of Trademarks is based on goodwill. The immense economic value of a successful
Trademark is the primary reasons for its protection under Trademark law. The success
of a Trademark can be judged through goodwill and goodwill is built on the notion of
the consumer which is developed by his experience and knowledge of the product and
for building goodwill it requires heavy investments and marketing but goodwill pay
backs heavily and therefore of immense importance.
Trade Marks perform many functions in present economy and these functions are
double edged as it helps the owner of the business as well as the consumers. Trade
Marks not only help in identify one seller’s good or services but it also distinguish
them from goods or services sold by others. Trade Marks perform unique function in
signifying that all goods or services bearing the Trade Mark come from a single,
albeit anonymous source not only this, it also creates impression in the mind of the
consumer that all goods bearing the Trade Marks are of an equal level of quality. It
serves as prime instrument in advertising and selling the goods or services. Not only
Trade Mark performs the abovementioned functions but it also make base for renting
the Trade Mark by way of licensing or franchising. It also protects the public against
confusion and deception by identifying the source of origin of particular products as
distinguished from other similar products. In modern time Trade Mark has become an
asset to the owner of the Trade Mark and therefore it helps in protecting the goodwill
of Trade Mark owner’s trade and business, which is attached to the Trademark.