Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Um - Case Study (International)
Um - Case Study (International)
Um - Case Study (International)
This particular case is between Winners’ Sun and Zhongshan Pinchuang Plastic
Products Co. Ltd (henceforth referred to as Pinchuang). Winners’ Sun sued Pinchuang
for patent infringement, arguing that Pinchuang was manufacturing infringing selfie sticks,
affixing different company’s logos onto the selfie sticks, and then selling the selfie sticks.
Winners’ Sun Plastic Electronics (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (henceforth referred to as Winners’
Sun) is the patentee of a utility model titled Integrated Self-Photographing Apparatus.
Winner’s Sun’s core business is selfie sticks, and it has grown that core business to 400
million within seven years. Winners’ Sun has been using this single, award-winning utility
model patent to file a massive number of lawsuits against manufacturers and sellers
nationwide (China) to protect its patent right. With patent number ZL201420522729.0
(‘729) and case number (2020) SPC IP Civil Final 357. The appellant (Defendant in the
original trial) is Zhongshan Pinchuang Plastic Products Co. Ltd, while the appellee
(Plaintiff in the original trial) is Winners’ Sun Plastic Electronics (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
The court will consider factors such as the value and profit rate of the infringer, the
operation status of the accused infringer, the subjective malice of the accused infringer,
and the compensation to the right holder in related cases.The SPC held in favor of
Winners’ Sun, handing it yet another legal victory. Despite repeated invalidation attacks,
Winners’ Sun’s utility model patent continues to hold strong and still remains valid. The
SPC also ruled that Pinchuang sold and manufactured the alleged infringing product, and
therefore is the source of the IP infringement. The court concluded that Pinchuang willfully
infringed the patents, continuing to manufacture and sell the products even after
defending two civil infringement lawsuits for breach of the same patents involved. The
court further judged that this action, combined with similar cases for several other
infringing products, reached the threshold demonstrating Pinchuang’s deliberate intent to
violate the patent right in this case. The court found Pinchuang’s activities to be a case of
serious infringement. The court also held that the statutory compensation amount should
be determined from a higher level within the range prescribed by law. As a result, the
appeal was rejected and the original verdict was upheld.
Reference:
China Patent Strategy. (2021). 2020 China Top 10 IP Cases: Winners’ Sun is truly a
Winner: A Simple Selfie-Stick Utility Model Patent Crushes Infringers in China.
https://chinapatentstrategy.com/a-simple-selfie-stick-utility-model-patent-
continues-crushing-it-against-infringers-in-
china/?fbclid=IwAR1PPam3g28bdiE5oBMUQYVZuJvTeOn4cIkSsg2J9F-
S3bRjTi5JqL567Sk