Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Greenspans Basic and Clinical Endocrinology 10Th Edition David G Gardner Full Chapter
Greenspans Basic and Clinical Endocrinology 10Th Edition David G Gardner Full Chapter
Greenspans Basic and Clinical Endocrinology 10Th Edition David G Gardner Full Chapter
Greenspan’s
Basic & Clinical
Endocrinology
Tenth Edition
Edited by
David G. Gardner, MD, MS
Mount Zion Health Fund Distinguished Professor of
Endocrinology and Medicine
Chief, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism
Department of Medicine and Diabetes Center
University of California, San Francisco
Dolores Shoback, MD
Professor of Medicine
Department of Medicine
University of California, San Francisco
Staff Physician, Endocrine-Metabolism Section,
Department of Medicine
San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center
New York Chicago San Francisco Athens London Madrid Mexico City
Milan New Delhi Singapore Sydney Toronto
ISBN: 978-1-25-958929-4
MHID: 1-25-958929-3.
The material in this eBook also appears in the print version of this title: ISBN: 978-1-25-958928-7,
MHID: 1-25-958928-5.
All trademarks are trademarks of their respective owners. Rather than put a trademark symbol after every occurrence of a trademarked
name, we use names in an editorial fashion only, and to the benefit of the trademark owner, with no intention of infringement of the
trademark. Where such designations appear in this book, they have been printed with initial caps.
McGraw-Hill Education eBooks are available at special quantity discounts to use as premiums and sales promotions or for use in corpo-
rate training programs. To contact a representative, please visit the Contact Us page at www.mhprofessional.com.
Notice
Medicine is an ever-changing science. As new research and clinical experience broaden our knowledge, changes in treatment and drug
therapy are required. The authors and the publisher of this work have checked with sources believed to be reliable in their efforts to
provide information that is complete and generally in accord with the standards accepted at the time of publication. However, in view
of the possibility of human error or changes in medical sciences, neither the authors nor the publisher nor any other party who has been
involved in the preparation or publication of this work warrants that the information contained herein is in every respect accurate or com-
plete, and they disclaim all responsibility for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from use of the information contained in
this work. Readers are encouraged to confirm the information contained herein with other sources. For example and in particular, readers
are advised to check the product information sheet included in the package of each drug they plan to administer to be certain that the
information contained in this work is accurate and that changes have not been made in the recommended dose or in the contraindications
for administration. This recommendation is of particular importance in connection with new or infrequently used drugs.
TERMS OF USE
This is a copyrighted work and McGraw-Hill Education and its licensors reserve all rights in and to the work. Use of this work is subject
to these terms. Except as permitted under the Copyright Act of 1976 and the right to store and retrieve one copy of the work, you may
not decompile, disassemble, reverse engineer, reproduce, modify, create derivative works based upon, transmit, distribute, disseminate,
sell, publish or sublicense the work or any part of it without McGraw-Hill Education’s prior consent. You may use the work for your
own noncommercial and personal use; any other use of the work is strictly prohibited. Your right to use the work may be terminated if
you fail to comply with these terms.
THE WORK IS PROVIDED “AS IS.” McGRAW-HILL EDUCATION AND ITS LICENSORS MAKE NO GUARANTEES OR WAR-
RANTIES AS TO THE ACCURACY, ADEQUACY OR COMPLETENESS OF OR RESULTS TO BE OBTAINED FROM USING
THE WORK, INCLUDING ANY INFORMATION THAT CAN BE ACCESSED THROUGH THE WORK VIA HYPERLINK OR
OTHERWISE, AND EXPRESSLY DISCLAIM ANY WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. McGraw-Hill Education and
its licensors do not warrant or guarantee that the functions contained in the work will meet your requirements or that its operation will
be uninterrupted or error free. Neither McGraw-Hill Education nor its licensors shall be liable to you or anyone else for any inaccuracy,
error or omission, regardless of cause, in the work or for any damages resulting therefrom. McGraw-Hill Education has no responsibility
for the content of any information accessed through the work. Under no circumstances shall McGraw-Hill Education and/or its licensors
be liable for any indirect, incidental, special, punitive, consequential or similar damages that result from the use of or inability to use
the work, even if any of them has been advised of the possibility of such damages. This limitation of liability shall apply to any claim or
cause whatsoever whether such claim or cause arises in contract, tort or otherwise.
Francis Sorrel Greenspan, M.D. (1920-2016)
The tenth edition of Greenspan’s Basic & Clinical Endocrinology is dedicated to the memories of four outstanding
endocrinologists—Dr. John Baxter, Dr. Claude Arnaud, Dr. Melvin Grumbach, and, most especially, Dr. Francis Greenspan
who was responsible for taking the initial steps to assemble this textbook more than thirty years ago. Each of these individu-
als was an outstanding endocrine scientist and/or clinical endocrinologist in the global endocrine community, and each
contributed enormously to the success of this textbook.
Treatment for Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Complications and Sequelae 428
Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma 405 Treatment 428
Prognosis 408 Congenital Bilateral Anorchia (Vanishing Testes
Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma: Postoperative Syndrome) 429
Long-Term Surveillance 409 Etiology and Pathophysiology 429
Testicular Pathology 429
12. Testes 413 Clinical Features 429
Bradley D. Anawalt, MD and Differential Diagnosis 429
Treatment 429
Glenn D. Braunstein, MD
Leydig Cell Aplasia 429
Anatomy and Structure-Function Relationships 413 Etiology and Pathophysiology 429
Testes 413 Clinical Features 429
Accessory Structures 415 Differential Diagnosis 430
Physiology of the Male Reproductive System 415 Treatment 430
Gonadal Steroids 415 Noonan Syndrome (Male Turner Syndrome) 430
Control of Testicular Function 417 Clinical Features 430
Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Leydig Cell Axis 417 Differential Diagnosis 430
Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Seminiferous Tubular Treatment 430
Axis 418 Causes of Primary Hypogonadism Presenting in
Evaluation of Male Gonadal Function 418 Adulthood 430
Clinical Evaluation 418 Myotonic Dystrophy 430
Clinical Presentation 418 Clinical Features 430
Genital Examination 419 Treatment 431
Laboratory Tests of Testicular Function 420 Late-Onset Male Hypogonadism 431
Serum Testosterone Measurement 420 Etiology, Pathology, and Pathophysiology 431
Serum Estradiol Measurement 421 Clinical Features 431
Gonadotropin and Prolactin Measurements 421 Differential Diagnosis 431
Special Tests 421 Treatment 431
Semen Analysis 421 Specific Sequelae of Hypogonadism 432
Chorionic Gonadotropin Stimulation Test 422 Male Infertility 432
Testicular Biopsy 422 Etiology and Pathophysiology 432
Evaluation for Male Hypogonadism 422 Clinical Features 433
Drugs Used for Testosterone Replacement Therapy in Male Treatment 433
Hypogonadism 422 Course and Prognosis 434
Androgens 422 Erectile Dysfunction 434
Oral Androgens 422 Etiology and Pathophysiology 434
Injectable Testosterone Esters 423 Clinical Features 434
Implantable Testosterone Pellets 424 Treatment 436
Transdermal Testosterone Therapy 424 Gynecomastia 436
Gonadotropin Therapy 424 Etiology and Pathophysiology 436
Injectable Human Chorionic Gonadotropin 424 Pathology 437
Recombinant Human Luteinizing Hormone 424 Clinical Features 437
Side Effects of Testosterone Replacement Therapy 424 Differential Diagnosis 438
Clinical Male Gonadal Disorders 425 Complications and Sequelae 439
Syndromes Associated with Primary Gonadal Treatment 439
Dysfunction 425 Course and Prognosis 439
Causes of Primary Hypogonadism Presenting in Testicular Tumors 439
Childhood 425 Etiology and Pathophysiology 439
Klinefelter Syndrome (XXY Seminiferous Tubule Pathology 439
Dysgenesis) 425 Clinical Features 440
Etiology and Pathophysiology 426 Differential Diagnosis 440
Testicular Pathology 426 Treatment 441
Clinical Features 426 Course and Prognosis 441
Differential Diagnosis 427
Treatment 427 13. Female Reproductive Endocrinology
Cryptorchidism 427 and Infertility 443
Etiology and Pathophysiology 427
Pathology 427 Mitchell P. Rosen, MD and Marcelle I. Cedars, MD
Clinical Features 428 Embryology and Anatomy 444
Differential Diagnosis 428 Ovarian Steroidogenesis 446
Physiology of Folliculogenesis and the Menstrual Cycle 448 Initial Formation of the Urogenital Ridges 503
The Hypothalamic-Pituitary Axis 448 The Bipotential Gonads 504
Role of the Pituitary 449 The Unipotential Internal Ducts 504
Role of the Ovary 450 Wolffian Ducts 505
Role of the Uterus 456 Müllerian Ducts 505
Menstrual Disturbances 457 The Bipotential Urogenital Sinus and External
Amenorrhea 457 Genitalia 505
Hypothalamic Amenorrhea 457 Gonadal Differentiation 505
Isolated GnRH Deficiency 457 Testicular Differentiation 505
Pituitary Amenorrhea 461 Ovarian Differentiation 506
Ovarian Amenorrhea 463 Genetic Mechanisms 507
Premature Ovarian Failure 464 The Importance of the Y Chromosome
Anovulation 466 and the SRY Gene 507
Hyperandrogenism and Anovulation 466 Other Pathways in Testicular versus Ovarian
Obesity 474 Differentiation 507
Management of Obesity 474 Differences in Testicular and Ovarian Germ Cell
Anovulation Unrelated to Excess Sex Steroid Development 509
Production 474 Hormone-Dependent Differentiation of the
Outflow Tract Disorders 475 Genitalia 509
Menopause 476 One Gonad, Two Cells, Two Hormones 509
Oocyte Depletion 477 AMH and the Fate of Müllerian Ducts 509
Endocrine System Changes with Aging 478 Regulation of AMH Expression 509
Estrogens/Progesterone 479 AMH Action 510
Androgens 479 Müllerian Derivatives in the Female 510
Hypothalamic/Pituitary 479 Androgens and the Fate of the Wolffian Ducts,
Menopausal Consequences 480 Urogenital Sinus, and External Genitalia 510
Vasomotor Symptoms 480 Steroidogenesis 510
Genital Atrophy 480 Androgen Action in Target Tissues 511
Osteoporosis 480 Wolffian Duct Derivatives 512
Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease 482 The Bipotential Urogenital Sinus 512
Treatment—Summary 482 The Bipotential External Genitalia 513
Infertility 483 Testicular Descent 513
Diagnosis of Infertility 483 Disorders of Sex Differentiation (DSD) 513
Ovulatory Defects 483 Definitions and Historical Perspectives 513
Pelvic Disorders 484 Pathogenic Classification 516
Male Factor Causes 484 Malformative DSD: Defects in the Morphogenesis
Unexplained Infertility 485 of the Urogenital Primordia 516
Management of the Infertile Couple 485 Dysgenetic DSD: Abnormal Gonadal
Ovulatory Disorders 485 Differentiation 519
Pelvic Disorders 485 Non-dysgenetic DSD with Testicular
Male Factor Infertility 485 Differentiation 522
Unexplained Infertility 486 Non-dysgenetic DSD with Ovarian
Contraception 486 Differentiation 525
Oral Contraceptives 486 Management of Patients with DSD 532
Combination Pills 486 General Aspects 532
Progestin Only 490 Diagnostic Workup 534
Contraception: Long-Acting Contraceptives 491 Gender Assignment 539
Injectable Contraceptives 492 Long-Term Outcomes 541
Subdermal Implants 494 Fertility Issues 543
Transdermal Patch 495
Vaginal Rings 496 15. Puberty 547
Intrauterine Devices 496
Emergency Contraception 497 Dennis Styne, MD
Physiology of Puberty 547
14. Disorders of Sex Development 501 Physical Changes Associated with Puberty 547
Rodolfo A. Rey, MD, PhD, Endocrine Changes from Fetal Life to Puberty 551
Christopher P. Houk, MD, Ovulation and Menarche 554
Selma Witchel, MD, and Peter A. Lee, MD, PhD Adrenarche 554
Miscellaneous Metabolic Changes 554
Normal Fetal Sex Differentiation 503
Delayed Puberty or Absent Puberty (Sexual
The Undifferentiated Stage 503
Infantilism) 554
Constitutional Delay in Growth and Adolescence 554 Endocrinology of the Puerperium 588
Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism 556 Physiologic and Anatomic Changes 588
Hypergonadotropic Hypogonadism 560 Uterine Changes 588
Differential Diagnosis of Delayed Puberty 563 Endocrine Changes 588
Treatment of Delayed Puberty 564 Lactation 589
Precocious Puberty (Sexual Precocity) 566 Endocrine Disorders and Pregnancy 589
Central (Complete or True) Precocious Puberty 566 Hyperthyroidism in Pregnancy 589
Peripheral or Incomplete Isosexual Precocious Puberty in Hypothyroidism in Pregnancy 589
Boys 568 Pituitary Disorders in Pregnancy 589
Peripheral or Incomplete Contrasexual Precocity in Obesity and Pregnancy 590
Boys 568 Parathyroid Disease and Pregnancy 591
Peripheral or Incomplete Isosexual Precocious Puberty Preeclampsia/Eclampsia 591
in Girls 569 Pathophysiology 592
Peripheral or Incomplete Contrasexual Precocity in Clinical Features 592
Girls 569 Treatment/Management of Preeclampsia 592
Variations in Pubertal Development 569
Differential Diagnosis of Precocious 17. Pancreatic Hormones and
Puberty 570 Diabetes Mellitus 595
Treatment of Precocious Puberty 572
Umesh Masharani, MB, BS, MRCP (UK)
16. The Endocrinology of Pregnancy 575 and Michael S. German, MD
Bansari Patel, MD, Joshua F. Nitsche, MD, PhD, The Endocrine Pancreas 596
and Robert N. Taylor, MD, PhD Anatomy and Histology 596
Hormones of the Endocrine Pancreas 597
Conception and Implantation 575 Biosynthesis 597
Fertilization 575 Biochemistry 597
Implantation and hCG Production 576 Secretion 599
Ovarian Hormones of Pregnancy 577 Insulin Receptors and Insulin Action 601
Symptoms and Signs of Pregnancy 577 Metabolic Effects of Insulin 602
Fetal-Placental-Decidual Unit 577 Glucose Transporter Proteins 604
Polypeptide Hormones 577 Islet Amyloid Polypeptide 605
Human Chorionic Gonadotropin 577 Biochemistry 605
Human Placental Lactogen 577 Secretion 605
Other Chorionic Peptide Hormones and Growth Action of Glucagon 605
Factors 580 Glucagon-Related Peptides 606
Steroid Hormones 580 Diabetes Mellitus 609
Progesterone 580 Classification 609
Estrogens 580 Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus 609
Maternal Adaptation to Pregnancy 581 Autoimmunity and Type 1 Diabetes 610
Maternal Pituitary Gland 581 Genetics of Type 1 Diabetes 611
Maternal Thyroid Gland 581 Environmental Factors in Type 1 Diabetes 611
Maternal Parathyroid Gland 581 Type 2 Diabetes 612
Maternal Pancreas 581 Monogenic Diabetes 615
Maternal Adrenal Cortex 583 Autosomal Dominant Genetic Defects of
Fetal Endocrinology 584 Pancreatic b Cells 615
Fetal Pituitary Hormones 584 Other Genetic Defects of Pancreatic b Cells 618
Fetal Thyroid Gland 584 Ketosis-Prone Diabetes 619
Fetal Adrenal Cortex 584 Genetic Defects of Insulin Action 620
Fetal Gonads 584 Neonatal Diabetes 621
Endocrine Control of Parturition 585 Monogenic Autoimmune Syndromes 621
Progesterone and Nuclear Progesterone Other Genetic Syndromes Sometimes Associated
Receptors 585 with Diabetes 621
Estrogens and Nuclear Estrogen Receptors 585 Secondary Diabetes 621
Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone 585 Diabetes due to Diseases of the Exocrine Pancreas 621
Oxytocin 586 Endocrinopathies 622
Prostaglandins 586 Drug- or Chemical-Induced Diabetes 622
Preterm Labor/Birth 586 Infections Causing Diabetes 622
Predictors/Prevention of Preterm Labor 586 Uncommon Forms of Immune-Mediated Diabetes 622
Management of Preterm Labor 587 Clinical Features of Diabetes Mellitus 622
Postterm Pregnancy 587 Type 1 Diabetes 622
Management of Postterm Pregnancy 588
Hormones are signaling molecules that traffic information from itself (autocrine effect), or without actually being released from
one point to another, typically through a soluble medium like the secretory cell (intracrine effect) (Figure 1–1).
the extracellular fluid or blood. Hormones fall into one of a Identification of a tissue as a target for a particular hormone
number of different hormonal classes (eg, steroids, mono- requires the presence of receptors for the hormone in cells of the target
amines, peptides, proteins, and eicosanoids) and signal through tissue. These receptors, in turn, are linked to effector mechanisms that
a variety of general (eg, nuclear vs cell surface) and specific (eg, lead to the physiological effects associated with the hormone.
tyrosine kinase vs phosphoinositide turnover) mechanisms in
target cells.
Hormones produced in one tissue may promote activity in a RELATIONSHIP TO THE NERVOUS
target tissue at some distance from the point of secretion (endo- SYSTEM
crine effect). In this case the hormone travels through the blood-
stream, often bound to a plasma protein, to access the target Many features of the endocrine system, such as the use of ligands
tissue. In addition, hormones may act locally following secretion; and receptors to communicate between cells, are also found in the
either on a neighboring cell (paracrine effect), on the secretory cell nervous system. In fact, from a functional standpoint, the two
H H
H R H R
H H
H
H H H H
H N
Intracrine
H N
R H R H
Axon
Auto-
Endocrine
crine Blood
vessel
Paracrine
R
N
crine
Para N
R H R H H N
N
H N
R R
H R
FIGURE 1–1 Actions of hormones and neurotransmitters. Endocrine and neurotransmitter cells synthesize hormones and release them by
specialized secretory pathways or by diffusion. Hormones can act at the site of production either following release (autocrine) or without
release (intracrine) from the producer cell. They can also act on neighboring target cells, including neurotransmitter-producing cells, without
entering the circulation (paracrine). Finally, they can access target cells through the circulation (endocrine). Neurotransmitters that access the
extracellular compartment, including circulating plasma, can act as paracrine or endocrine regulators of target cell activity (H, hormone;
N, neurotransmitter; R, receptor).
systems are probably related evolutionarily. However, there are neuron. It does this through pulsatile release of secretory granules
some important differences between the two systems. While the into an incredibly small volume (ie, that determined by the vol-
nervous system uses a highly compartmentalized, closed system ume in the synaptic cleft).
of axons and dendrites to connect cells at some distance from one The endocrine system, on the other hand, has a very large
another, the endocrine system relies on circulating plasma to volume of distribution for many of its ligands (eg, circulating
carry newly released hormones to their distant targets. As a result, blood volume). Maintaining ligand concentrations analogous to
the time constants for signal delivery are quite different between those present in the synaptic cleft would require prodigious secre-
the two—virtually instantaneous for the nervous system but tory capacity. The endocrine system circumvents this problem by
delayed, by virtue of circulation times, for the endocrine system. using ligand–receptor interactions with 100-10,000 fold higher
Thus, while neural responses are typically measured in seconds, binding affinity than those used in the nervous system. In effect,
endocrine responses are often measured in minutes to hours— the nervous system is structured to deliver high ligand concentra-
thereby accommodating different needs in the organism. A sec- tions to relatively low-affinity receptors, allowing it to activate and
ond difference relates to the nature of the ligand–receptor inactivate biological effects quickly and in a relatively well-defined
interaction. In the nervous system, the affinity of receptor for topography. Its effects are short lived. In contrast, the endocrine
ligand tends to be relatively low. This allows for rapid dissociation system uses high-affinity receptors to extract and retain ligand
of ligand from receptor and, if that ligand is degraded locally, a from a relatively “dilute” pool in circulating plasma. Its biological
rapid cessation of biological effect. Despite this rapid dissocia- effects are long lasting. It has sacrificed rapid response to accom-
tion, the secretory neuron is able to maintain receptor occupancy modate a wider area of signal distribution and prolongation of the
by keeping concentrations of the ligand high around the target biological effect. Thus, the systems are not only related but
complementary in the respective roles that they play in normal of protein or peptide hormones this usually reflects increased
physiological function. expression of the gene encoding the hormone (ie, increased pro-
duction of the mRNA encoding the hormone) with subsequent
increases in hormone synthesis. In the case of steroid or thyroid
CHEMICAL NATURE OF HORMONES hormones it reflects increased sequestration of precursors for hor-
mone synthesis (eg, cholesterol for steroid hormones or iodide for
Hormones vary widely in terms of their chemical composition. thyroid hormone) as well as increased activity of enzymatic pro-
Specific examples include proteins (eg, adrenocorticotrophin), teins responsible for executing the individual catalytic events
peptides (eg, vasopressin), monoamines (eg, norepinephrine), required for hormone production. The latter may involve a rate-
amino acid derivatives (eg, triiodothyronine), steroids (eg, cortisol), limiting step in the synthetic cascade (eg, 1-alpha hydroxylase
and lipids (eg, prostaglandins). Proteins can be glycosylated (eg, activity in the synthesis of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D).
thyroid-stimulating hormone) and/or dimerized (eg, follicle-stim-
ulating hormone) to generate full biological activity. In general,
protein, peptide, monoamine, and lipophilic hormones tend to Precursor Processing
exert their effects primarily through protein receptors at the cell Processing of hormone precursors contributes to varying degrees
membrane, while thyroid hormone and steroids tend to operate in in controlling circulating hormone levels. Most peptide and pro-
the cell nucleus. However, exceptions to these rules are being rec- tein hormones require some processing to generate the mature
ognized (eg, triiodothyronine activates classic thyroid hormone hormonal product (eg, conversion of proinsulin to insulin) and
receptors in the nuclear compartment and the trace amine receptor impairment in the processing activity can alter the ratio of precur-
[TAR1] on the cell surface) and estradiol appears to activate both sor to product in plasma. In other cases, a critical processing event
nuclear and plasma membrane receptors. It is likely that the bio- is part of the secretory process itself (eg, cleavage of thyroxine
logical “effect” of a given hormone reflects a composite of receptor from thyroglobulin) and impaired processing can result in a dra-
activity located in several different cellular compartments. matic reduction in immunoreactivity as well as bioactivity of the
mature hormone. In addition, protein hormones may require
post-translational modification (eg, glycosylation) or assembly (eg,
ENDOCRINE GLANDS AND TARGET heterodimerization) prior to secretion in order to optimize bio-
ORGANS logical activity.
HORMONE ACTION
Blood vessel Target tissues Hormones produce their biologic effects through interaction with
high-affinity receptors that are, in turn, linked to one or more
FIGURE 1–2 Role of plasma binding in delivery of hormones to effector systems within the cell. These effectors involve many dif-
peripheral tissues. Example shows a hormone that is bound (small
ferent components of the cell’s metabolic machinery, ranging from
red circles) to a plasma protein (large circles) and a hormone that is
not protein bound (small orange circles). With the bound hormone,
ion transport at the cell surface to stimulation of the nuclear tran-
only the free fraction is available for tissue uptake. As the free frac- scriptional apparatus. Steroids and thyroid hormones exert their
tion is depleted, additional hormone dissociates from the plasma- effects in the cell nucleus, although regulatory activity in the
binding protein, making hormone available to more distal portions extranuclear compartment has also been documented. Peptide
of the tissue. In contrast, all hormones that are not protein bound are hormones and neurotransmitters, on the other hand, trigger a
quickly extracted in the proximal part of the tissue. plethora of signaling activity in the cytoplasmic and membrane
compartments while at the same time exerting parallel effects on
the transcriptional apparatus. The discussion that follows will
perfusing target tissues (Figure 1–2). Second, it slows the metabo- focus on the primary signaling systems employed by selected hor-
lism or turnover of the hormone by sequestering it away from monal agonists and attempt to identify examples where aberrant
degradative enzymes or filtration by the kidney. signaling results in human disease.
complex, and k+1 and k–1 are the rate constants for [HR] forma- at which one-half of the available receptors are occupied. Thus,
tion and dissociation, respectively. Thus, at equilibrium, knowledge of bound and free ligand concentrations, which can be
determined experimentally, provides information regarding the
k+1[ H ][ R ] = k−1[HR] affinity of the receptor for its ligand and the total concentration of
or receptor in the preparation.
[ H ][ R ] k−1 Agents that bind to receptors with high affinity are classified as
= = KD either agonists or antagonists based on the functional outcome of
[HR] k+1
this receptor–ligand interaction. Agonists are ligands that trigger
where KD is the equilibrium dissociation constant that defines the the effector mechanisms and produce biologic effects. Antagonists
affinity of the hormone–receptor interaction (ie, lower the disso- bind to the receptor but do not activate the effector mechanisms.
ciation constant, higher the affinity). Assuming that total receptor Because they occupy receptor and block association with the ago-
concentration R0 = [HR] + [R], this equation can be rearranged to nist, they antagonize the functional activity of the agonist. Partial
give agonists bind to the receptor but possess limited ability to activate
the effector mechanisms. In different circumstances, partial ago-
[HR] [HR] R0
= − + nists may demonstrate variable biologic activity. For example,
[H] KD KD when used alone, they may display weak activating activity,
whereas their use together with a full agonist may lead to inhibi-
This is the Scatchard equation and states that when bound ligand
tion of function because the latter is displaced from the receptor
over free ligand (ie, [HR]/[H]) is plotted against bound ligand (ie,
molecule by a ligand with lower intrinsic activity.
[HR]), the slope of the line is defined by -1/KD, the y-intercept by
In some systems, receptors are available in surplus, which may
R0/KD, and the x-intercept by R0 (Figure 1–3). When [HR] = R0/2,
be several-fold higher than that required to elicit a maximal bio-
[H] = KD; therefore, the KD is also the concentration of hormone [H]
logic response. Although such spare receptor systems superficially
appear redundant, they are designed to rectify a mismatch
A R0 between low circulating ligand levels and a relatively low-affinity
ligand–receptor interaction. Thus, by increasing the number of
available receptors, the system is guaranteed a sufficient number of
ligand-bound receptor units to activate downstream effector sys-
tems fully, despite operating at subsaturating levels of ligand.
[HR]
membrane-spanning segments relative to one another. One orien- TABLE 1–2 G protein subunits selectively interact
tation is favored in the absence of an agonist ligand. In this orien- with specific receptor and effector
tation the receptor does not activate a G protein (inactive mechanisms.
conformation). The second orientation is stabilized by the binding
of an appropriate agonist ligand. In this conformation the receptor Representative
G Protein Associated
activates a cognate G protein (active conformation). All GPCRs Subunit Receptors Effector
are thought to undergo a similar conformational switch on agonist
αs β-Adrenergic Adenylyl cyclase
binding, producing a structural change in the cytoplasmic domain
TSH Ca2+ channels
that promotes G protein activation. Some small agonists, such as Glucagon K+ channels
catecholamines, are able to enter the cavity formed by the trans-
αi α2-Adrenergic Adenylyl cyclase
membrane segments, thereby directly stabilizing the active recep- Muscarinic (type II) Ca2+ channels
tor conformation. Other agonists, such as large polypeptide K+ channels
hormones, bind primarily to the extracellular domain of their αq α1-Adrenergic PLCβ
GPCRs. More recently, a number of orphan GPCRs have been β/γ Adenylyl cyclase (+ or –)
found to be activated by hydrophobic ligands including steroids PLC Supports βARK-mediated
(eg, estrogen binding to GPR30) and lipids (eg, LPA binding to receptor phosphorylation and
GPR23). Ligand binding indirectly results in movement of the desensitization
transmembrane region of the receptor and stabilization of the
active receptor conformation.
Until recently, it was thought that GPCRs function exclusively G proteins are noncovalently tethered to the plasma membrane
as monomers. Many GPCRs are now known to dimerize either and are thus proximate to their cognate receptors and to their
with themselves (homodimerization) or with other GPCRs (het- effector targets. The basis for specificity in receptor–G protein
erodimerization). In some cases, dimerization is important for interactions has not been fully defined. It is likely that specific
efficient receptor biosynthesis and membrane localization. In structural determinants presented by the cytoplasmic loops of the
other cases, dimerization is important for optimal ligand affinity, GPCR determine the identity of the G proteins that are activated.
specificity, or receptor signaling. It is the nature of the α subunit of the G protein that is critical for
Heritable mutations in a variety of GPCRs are known to be receptor signaling. There are about a dozen different G protein α
associated with disease. Loss-of-function phenotypes can result subunits and hundreds of distinct GPCRs.
from mutations that eliminate one or both receptor alleles, or Clearly, each specific G protein can be activated by a large
that result in the synthesis of signaling-defective receptors. Gain- number of different receptors. For example, Gs is activated by
of-function phenotypes generally result from point mutations receptors for ligands as diverse as β-adrenergic catecholamines and
that produce constitutively active receptors (ie, stably assume the large polypeptide hormones such as luteinizing hormone (LH).
active receptor conformation even in the absence of an agonist LH is thereby able to stimulate adenylyl cyclase and raise intracel-
ligand). Examples of such GPCR disorders relevant to endocri- lular levels of cAMP in cells that express LH receptors (eg, Leydig
nology are described later and discussed in greater detail else- cells of the testis). In contrast, an individual GPCR can couple to
where in this book. multiple Gα subunits, often in response to different ligands (eg,
PTH receptor can activate Gs, Gi, and Gq).
Figure 1–5 is a schematic representation of the molecular
G PROTEIN TRANSDUCERS events associated with activation of G proteins by GPCRs. In the
basal, inactive state, the G protein is an intact heterotrimer with
G proteins are a family of heterotrimeric proteins that regulate guanosine diphosphate (GDP) bound to the α subunit. Agonist
the activity of effector molecules (eg, enzymes, ion channels) binding to a GPCR promotes the physical interaction between the
(examples in Table 1–2), ultimately resulting in biological receptor and its cognate G protein. This produces a conforma-
responses. The identity of a G protein is defined by the nature tional change in the G protein, resulting in the dissociation of
of its α subunit, which is largely responsible for effector activa- GDP. This in turn allows the binding of GTP (which is present at
tion. The major G proteins involved in hormone action (and a much higher concentration in cells than is GDP) to the α sub-
their actions on effectors) are Gs (stimulation of adenylyl unit. Dissociation of the GTP-bound α subunit from the βγ
cyclase), Gi (inhibition of adenylyl cyclase; regulation of calcium dimer then occurs, allowing these subunits to activate their effec-
and potassium channels), and Gq/11 (stimulation of phospholi- tor targets. Dissociation of the hormone–receptor complex also
pase C [PLC] β). Recently, GPCRs linked to G12/13 were identi- occurs. The duration of activation is determined by the intrinsic
fied as key inputs of the Hippo/YAP/TAZ transcriptional GTPase activity of the G protein α subunit. Hydrolysis of GTP to
regulators, which play a central role in controlling organ size, GDP terminates the activity and promotes reassociation of the
growth, and integrating extracellular cues. In each of these cases, αβγ trimer, returning the system to the basal state. The GTPase
the β and γ subunits of G proteins are tightly associated with one activity of G protein α subunits can be increased by the action of
another and function as a dimer. In some cases, the βγ subunit proteins termed “regulators of G protein signaling” (RGS pro-
dimer can also regulate effector function. teins) which act by increasing the speed of GTP cycling.
R EFFECTORS
H Numerous effectors have been linked to the GPCRs. A number of
R these are presented in Table 1–2. A great many other G pro-
GTP
teins—not dealt with here—are coupled to physical or biochemi-
cal stimuli but have very limited involvement in hormone action.
R α
H H
As discussed, adenylyl cyclase, perhaps the best studied of the
group, is activated by Gs (Figure 1–6). This activation results in a
β/γ transient increase in intracellular cAMP levels. The cAMP binds
α GDP to the inhibitory regulatory subunit of inactive protein kinase A
β/γ GDP (PKA) and promotes its dissociation from the complex, thereby
α permitting enhanced activity of the catalytic subunit. The latter
β/γ GTP phosphorylates a variety of cellular substrates, among them the
E hepatic phosphorylase kinase that initiates the enzymatic cascade
which results in enhanced glycogenolysis. It also phosphorylates
and activates the cAMP response element–binding protein
α α (CREB), which mediates many of the known transcriptional
GDP E GTP responses to cAMP (and to some extent calcium) in the nuclear
compartment. Other transcription factors are also known to be
Pi Biologic effect
phosphorylated by PKA.
FIGURE 1–5 G protein–mediated signal transduction. α and β/γ PLC beta (PLCβ) is a second effector system that has been
subunits of a representative G protein are depicted (see text for studied extensively. The enzyme is activated through Gq-mediated
details) (E, effector; H, hormonal ligand; R, hormone receptor).
Epinephrine Transport to
extracellular space
β-AR Adenylyl
Gs cyclase ATP
cAMP
PKA
regulatory
R cAMP
subunit
R R Phosphodiesterase
PKA 5'-AMP
PKA
catalytic
subunit
Nucleus
Phosphorylate
cytosolic enzymes Core
(eg, phosphorylase transcription
kinase) factors
CREB CREB
TGACGTCA
PO4 PO4
Increased
transcription
CREB CREB
TGACGTCA
FIGURE 1–6 β-Adrenergic receptor/Gs mediated signaling in the cytoplasmic and nuclear compartments. The cAMP response element–
binding protein (CREB) is depicted bound to a consensus CRE in the basal state. Phosphorylation of this protein leads to activation of the juxta-
posed core transcriptional machinery.
transduction of signals generated by a wide array of hormone– However, not all PKC activity derives from the breakdown of
receptor complexes, including those for angiotensin II, α-adrenergic PIP2 substrate. Metabolism of phosphatidylcholine by PLCPC
agonists, and endothelin. Activation of the enzyme leads to cleav- (phosphatidylcholine-selective phospholipase) leads to the genera-
age of phosphoinositol 4,5-bisphosphate in the plasma membrane tion of phosphocholine and DAG. This latter pathway is believed
to generate inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol to be responsible for the more protracted elevations in PKC activ-
(DAG) (Figure 1–7). The former interacts with a specific receptor ity seen following exposure to agonist.
present on the endoplasmic reticulum membrane to promote Other phospholipases may also be important in hormone-
release of Ca2+ into the cytoplasmic compartment. The increased dependent signaling. Phospholipase D employs phosphatidylcho-
calcium, in turn, may activate protein kinases, promote secretion, line as a substrate to generate choline and phosphatidic acid. The
or foster contractile activity. Depletion of intracellular calcium latter may serve as a precursor for subsequent DAG formation. As
pools by IP3 results in enhanced uptake of calcium across the with PLCPC earlier, no IP3 is generated as a consequence of this
plasma membrane (perhaps through generation of IP4 [1,3,4,5- reaction. Phospholipase A2 triggers release of arachidonic acid, a
tetrakisphosphate]), thereby activating a second, albeit indirect, precursor of prostaglandins, leukotrienes, endoperoxides, and
signaling mechanism that serves to increase intracellular calcium thromboxanes, all signaling molecules in their own right. The rela-
levels even further. DAG functions as an activator of several protein tive contribution of these other phospholipases to hormone-
kinase C (PKC) isoforms within cells. Several different isoforms of mediated signal transduction and the role of the specific lipid
PKC (eg, α, β, γ) may exist in a given cell type. A number of these breakdown products (eg, phosphocholine, phosphatidic acid) in
are calcium-dependent, a property which, given the IP3 activity conveying regulatory information remains an area of active research.
mentioned earlier, provides the opportunity for a synergistic inter- Activation of effectors by GPCRs is subject to regulatory
action of the two signaling pathways driven by PLCβ activity. mechanisms that prevent overstimulation of cells by an agonist
Ligand
PLCPC PLCβ2
PKC
+ Ca2+
Ca2+
Cytoplasmic and
membrane Ca2+
protein Calmodulin
phosphorylation
Ca2+-calmodulin
CaM kinase
+ Nucleus
+
Increased
transcription
c-jun c-fos CREB CREB
TGACTCA TGACGTCA
Core transcription factors
FIGURE 1–7 PLCβ-coupled receptor/Gq mediated signaling in the cytoplasmic and nuclear compartments (DAG, diacylglycerol;
PC, phosphatidylcholine; PKC, protein kinase C; PLC, phospholipase).
H
H
H H
H
R
ACa
G
ATP cAMP
PKA
β-ARK
Receptor
Adenylyl cyclase
R R
ACi ACi
G P
G protein
Phosphatase
Arrestin
FIGURE 1–8 Kinase-dependent desensitization of the ligand–receptor complex. Schema shown is that for the β-adrenergic receptor, but
similar systems probably exist for other types of G protein–linked receptors (ACa, active adenylyl cyclase; ACi, inactive adenylyl cyclase; β-ARK,
β-adrenergic receptor kinase; PKA, protein kinase A).
ligand. At the level of the receptor, two regulatory events are known lowering steady-state receptor levels. Together, these regulatory
to occur. One is desensitization, wherein initial stimulation of a events ensure that the cell is protected from excessive stimulation
receptor by its agonists leads to a loss of the ability of the receptor in the presence of sustained high levels of an agonist.
to subsequently elicit G protein activation. This is shown schemati- Recently, it has become clear that these events serving to
cally in Figure 1–8 for the β-adrenergic receptor. A similar regula- dampen G protein signaling can also have important roles in pro-
tory mechanism exists for many other GPCRs. Agonist binding to moting cell signaling. For example, arrestin association with
the receptor produces G protein activation and results also in acti- GPCRs can activate specific pathways such as the MAP kinase
vation of a kinase (termed G protein–coupled receptor kinase, pathway independently of G protein signaling. In addition, inter-
GRK) that phosphorylates the cytoplasmic domain of the receptor. nalized GPCRs can, in some cases, retain the ability to signal, and
By virtue of this phosphorylation, the receptor acquires high affin- the effects may differ from those produced when activation occurs
ity for a member of the arrestin family of proteins. The name at the plasma membrane.
“arrestin” derives from the observation that the receptor is no lon-
ger capable of interacting with a G protein when arrestin is bound.
Thus, the phosphorylated receptor becomes uncoupled from its G DISORDERS OF G PROTEINS AND G
protein, preventing signaling to the effector. The receptor remains PROTEIN–COUPLED RECEPTORS
inactive until a phosphatase acts to restore the receptor to its
unphosphorylated state thus releasing the bound arrestin. Recently, Two bacterial toxins are capable of covalently modifying specific G
β arrestin-dependent signaling pathways have been identified protein α subunits, thereby altering their functional activity. Chol-
where the arrestins can link GPCRs to intracellular signaling such era toxin is a protein that binds to receptors present on all cells,
as the MAPK cascades. Beta arrestins also appear to act directly as resulting in the internalization of the enzymatic subunit of the
signal transducers by interacting with regulators of transcription toxin. The toxin enzyme is an ADP-ribosyl transferase that trans-
201
factors. This receptor-independent signaling capacity likely has fers ADP-ribose from NAD to an acceptor site (Arg ) on the α
implications for endocrine diseases including those affecting bone. subunit of Gs. This covalent modification greatly inhibits the
Many GPCRs are also susceptible to agonist-induced down- GTPase activity of αs, enhancing the activation of adenylyl cyclase
regulation, resulting in a reduced level of cell surface receptors by extending the duration of the active GTP-bound form of the G
following exposure of cells to an agonist. This can result from protein. Even in the absence of an active GPCR, GDP dissociates
agonist-induced internalization of receptors, followed by traffick- (albeit very slowly) from the G protein. Thus, cholera toxin will
ing of receptors to lysosomes where degradation occurs. In addi- eventually activate adenylyl cyclase activity even without agonist
tion, chronic exposure of cells to an agonist may result in signaling binding to a GPCR. The result is a large and sustained activation
events that suppress the biosynthesis of new receptors, thereby of adenylyl cyclase. When this occurs in intestinal epithelial cells,
the massive increase in cAMP results in the increased water and salt with haploinsufficiency of αs are resistant to PTH. Interestingly,
secretion into the gut that is characteristic of cholera. essentially all patients with haploinsufficiency of Gαs display
Pertussis toxin is also an ADP-ribosyl transferase. However, in Albright hereditary osteodystrophy, a developmental disorder with
this case, the substrates are α subunits of different G proteins, phenotypic manifestations affecting a variety of tissues. This indi-
most notably Gi and Go. The ADP-ribose moiety is transferred to cates that even a partial loss of adenylyl cyclase signaling is incom-
a cysteine residue near the carboxyl terminus of the α subunit, a patible with normal development.
region required for interaction with activated GPCRs. Once Mutations in the genes encoding GPCRs are being increasingly
ADP-ribosylated by pertussis toxin, these G proteins are no longer recognized as important in the pathogenesis of endocrine disorders.
able to interact with activated receptors and are thus stuck in an Loss-of-function mutations generally need to be homozygous (or
inactive (GDP-bound) conformation. Inhibition of receptor- compound heterozygous) in order to result in a significant disease
mediated activation of Gi and Go accounts for many of the clinical phenotype. This is probably due to the fact that most cells express
manifestations of pertussis infection. higher levels of each receptor, above what is needed for maximal cel-
Genetic mutations in G protein α subunits are seen in a number lular response (spare receptors). Thus, a 50% reduction in the
of human diseases. Acquired activating mutations in Gαs can pro- amount of a cell surface receptor may have little influence on the
duce a variety of phenotypes depending on the site of expression of ability of a target cell to respond. However, in some situations, hap-
the mutant protein. In McCune-Albright syndrome, the mutation loinsufficiency of a GPCR can produce a clinical phenotype. For
occurs in a subset of neural crest cells during embryogenesis. All of instance, heterozygous loss-of-function mutations in the G protein–
the descendants of these cells, including certain osteoblasts, melano- coupled calcium-sensing receptor results in the autosomal dominant
cytes, and ovarian or testicular cells, express the mutant protein. The disorder familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia type 1 due to usually
result is a form of genetic mosaicism in which the consequence of mild dysregulation of PTH secretion and renal calcium handling.
unregulated production of cAMP in particular tissues is evident (ie, Homozygous loss-of-function of the calcium-sensing receptor results
the progressive bone disorder polyostotic fibrous dysplasia, the in severe neonatal hyperparathyroidism due to the loss of the ability
abnormal skin pigmentation referred to as café au lait spots, and of plasma calcium to suppress PTH secretion and promote renal
gonadotropin-independent precocious puberty). In cells where calcium clearance. Syndromes of hormone resistance have also been
cAMP is linked to cell proliferation (eg, thyrotropes, somatotropes), reported in patients lacking expression of functional GPCRs for
a subset of patients with benign tumors has been shown to have vasopressin, ACTH, and TSH. Loss of functional expression of the
acquired activating mutations in Gαs. Activating mutations in Gαi2, PTH receptor results in Blomstrand chondrodysplasia, a disorder
which is coupled to cell proliferation, have been reported in a subset that is lethal due to the inability of PTH-related protein (a PTH
of adrenal and ovarian tumors. receptor agonist) to promote normal cartilage development.
Loss-of-function mutations in Gαs are associated with the Mutations that render GPCRs constitutively active (in the
hereditary disorder pseudohypoparathyroidism type 1 (PHP-1a). absence of an agonist ligand) are seen in a number of endocrine
This disorder, first described by Fuller Albright, was the first docu- disorders. Generally speaking, such mutations produce a disease
mented example of a human disease attributable to target cell phenotype resembling that seen with excessive levels of the corre-
resistance to a hormone. Affected patients display biochemical sponding hormone agonist. Thus, activating mutations in the TSH
features of hypoparathyroidism (eg, hypocalcemia, hyperphospha- receptor produce neonatal thyrotoxicosis, and activating mutations
temia) but have markedly increased circulating levels of PTH and in the LH receptor result in pseudoprecocious puberty or testotoxi-
display target cell resistance to PTH. Many hormone receptors cosis. Activating mutations in the PTH receptor result in Jansen-
couple to adenylyl cyclase via Gαs, yet patients with PHP-1a gen- type metaphyseal chondrodysplasia; a disorder characterized by
erally display only subtle defects in responsiveness to other hor- hypercalcemia and increased bone resorption (mimicking the effects
mones (eg, TSH, LH). The explanation for this lies in the of excess PTH on bone) and delayed cartilage differentiation (mim-
fascinating genetics of this disorder. In brief, affected patients have icking the effects of excess PTH-related protein on cartilage). An
one normal and one mutated Gαs allele. The mutated allele fails approach to treating disorders resulting from constitutively active
to produce an active form of the protein. Tissues in these patients GPCRs would be administration of “inverse agonists,” agents that
are expected to express about 50% of the normal level of Gαs, a stabilize receptors in their inactive conformation. Although inverse
level sufficient to support signaling to adenylyl cyclase. However, agonists have been identified for a number of GPCRs, they have yet
in certain tissues, the αs gene is subject to genetic imprinting such to be successfully employed as therapeutics. In contrast, molecular
that the paternal allele is expressed poorly or not at all. In indi- mimics of endogenous ligands have found utility as a way to stimu-
viduals harboring inactivating mutations, if the paternal allele has late signaling via allosteric receptor changes. This is the basis for
the mutation, all cells express about 50% of the normal level of cinacalcet’s activity as a calcimimetic on the calcium-sensing recep-
Gαs (derived from the normal maternal allele). However, if the tor in the parathyroid cell and accounts for its utility in treating
maternal allele has the mutation, then the cells in which paternal secondary hyperparathyroidism. Finally, molecular analysis of
imprinting occurs express low levels or no Gαs. One of the major GPCRs has revealed that point mutations, in addition to producing
sites of this paternal imprinting is in the proximal renal tubule, an constitutive activity, can alter the specificity of ligand binding or the
important target tissue for the physiologic actions of PTH. This ability of the receptor to become desensitized. It is almost certain
accounts for the clinical resistance to PTH seen in PHP-1a and that such mutations will be found to provide the basis for some
accounts also for the fact that only a subset of patients more subtle endocrinopathies.
GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTORS receptor dimerization. The duration of signaling can be regulated
by clathrin, a protein that is required for cellular endocytosis.
The growth factor receptors differ from those described earlier Internalization of the ligand/receptor complex results in phos-
both structurally and functionally. Unlike the GPCRs, the growth phorylation of tyrosines both on the receptor itself as well as on
factor receptors span the membrane only once and acquire their nonreceptor substrates. It is assumed that phosphorylation of
signaling ability, at least in part, through activation of tyrosine these substrates results in a cascade of activation events, similar to
kinase activity, which is intrinsic to the individual receptor mole- those described for the G protein–coupled systems, which con-
cules. The insulin and IGF receptors fall within this group, as do tribute to perturbations in intracellular pathways. The autophos-
those for the autocrine or paracrine regulators platelet-derived phorylation of the receptor molecules themselves has been studied
growth factor (PDGF), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), and EGF. extensively and provide some intriguing insights into the mecha-
Signaling is initiated by the association of ligand (eg, insulin) with nisms that underlie signal transduction by this group of proteins.
the receptor’s extracellular domain (Figure 1–9) and subsequent Tyrosine phosphorylation takes place at specific locations in
the receptor molecule. Once phosphorylated, these sites associ-
ate, in highly specific fashion, with a variety of accessory proteins
that possess independent signaling capability. These include
PLCγ, phosphoinositol (PI) 3′ kinase, GTPase-activating protein
Ligand (GAP), growth factor receptor–bound protein-2 (GRB2), and
the Src family nonreceptor tyrosine kinases. These interactions
Receptor are fostered by the presence of highly conserved type 2 src
homology (based on sequence homology to the src proto-onco-
gene) domains (SH2) in each of the accessory molecules. Each
individual SH2 domain displays specificity for the contextual
amino acids surrounding the phosphotyrosine residues in the
Y Y P receptor molecule. In the PDGF receptor, for example, the SH2
domain of PLCγ associates selectively with Tyr977 and Tyr989,
whereas that of PI 3′ kinase associates with Tyr708 and Tyr719.
Thus, diversity of response is controlled by contextual sequences
around individual phosphotyrosine residues that determine the
types of accessory proteins brought into the signaling complex.
These protein–protein interactions may provide a means of
directly controlling the signaling molecule in question, perhaps
P P through a change in steric conformation. Alternatively, they may
Y Y
SH3
SH3
Ligand
PIP3
PI(3,4)P2
P Raf-1
p110 GRB2 SOS Ras
PKB p85 P MEK-1
P
PI3K
P ERK
PDK1
PDK2
ERK
FIGURE 1–10 Growth factor–dependent pathway. Assembly of the components involved in the Ras/Raf/MEK/MAPK and PI-3K/PKB–
signaling mechanisms.
The ligand bound growth factor receptors, including the insulin through a nonreceptor protein tyrosine kinase (NRPTK such as
receptor, may also signal through the phosphoinositide 3-OH kinase Src and Fyn) rather than the traditional growth factor receptor–
(PI-3K). SH2 domains of the p85 regulatory subunit of PI-3K asso- linked tyrosine kinases. The details of the mechanism are incom-
ciate with the growth factor receptor through specific phosphotyro- pletely understood, but it appears to require the participation of
sine residues (Tyr740 and Tyr751 in the PDGF receptor) in a manner β-arrestin (discussed earlier) as an adaptor molecule linking the G
similar to that described earlier for GRB2 (see Figure 1–10). This protein receptor to the NRPTK. Interestingly, this implies that
leads to activation of the p110 catalytic subunit of PI-3K and β-arrestin, which normally terminates coupling between the
increased production of phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate receptor and G protein, can actually promote coupling between
(PIP3) and phosphatidylinositol-3,4-bisphosphate (PI[3,4]P2). These the desensitized receptor and downstream effectors traditionally
latter molecules sequester protein kinase B (also known as Akt) at the associated with growth factor–dependent activation.
cell membrane through association with the plekstrin homology
domains in the amino terminal of the kinase molecule. This in turn
leads to phosphorylation of PKB at two separate sites (Thr308 in the CYTOKINE RECEPTORS
active kinase domain and Ser473 in the carboxyl terminal tail) by
These include the receptors for a variety of cytokines, such as
PIP3-dependent kinases (PDK1 and PDK2). These phosphoryla-
erythropoietin, colony-stimulating factor, GH, and prolactin.
tions result in activation of PKB. In the case of insulin-sensitive tar-
These cell membrane receptors have a single internal hydrophobic
get cells, downstream targets of activated PKB (eg, following insulin
stretch of amino acids, suggesting that they span the membrane
stimulation) include 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase (increased activity),
once (see Figure 1–4). They can be composed of monomers or
glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK3) (decreased activity), the insulin-
heterodimers of different molecules.
responsive glucose transporter GLUT 4 (translocation and increased
activity), and p70 S6 kinase (increased activity). This leads to
increased glycolysis, increased glycogen synthesis, increased glucose Growth Hormone and Prolactin Receptors
transport, and increased protein synthesis, respectively. There is also Receptors for GH and prolactin are prototypical cytokine recep-
a growing body of evidence suggesting that PKB may protect cells tors (Figure 1–11). Interestingly, alternative splicing of the GH
from programmed cell death through phosphorylation of key pro- receptor gene primary transcript results in a foreshortened “recep-
teins in the apoptotic pathway. tor” that lacks the membrane anchor and carboxyl terminal
It has been reported that GPCRs may also activate the Raf- domain of the protein. This “receptor” is secreted and serves to
MEK-ERK cascade, although in this case the signal traffics bind GH in the extracellular space (eg, circulating plasma). Unlike
GH
GH
Y Y P JAK2 Y Y JAK2 P
Y Y
JAK2 JAK2
Y Y
P P
STAT STAT
GH
STAT STAT
GHR GHR P P
Transcription
JAK2 JAK2 DNA
P Y Y Y Y P SIE GAS ISRE
P P
STAT STAT
P P
FIGURE 1–11 Signaling by the growth hormone receptor (GHR). Different portions of a single growth hormone molecule associate with
homologous regions of two independent GHR molecules. This is believed to lead to the recruitment of JAK2, which phosphorylates the GHR,
providing a docking site for STAT. The latter is phosphorylated, dissociates from the liganded receptor complex, and migrates to the nucleus,
where it associates with binding elements of target genes and regulates transcription.
the growth factor receptors described earlier, GH receptors lack a bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) family. Diseases associated
tyrosine kinase domain. Different domains of a single GH mole- with mutations in the TGF-β receptor pathways can be very
cule associate with homologous regions of two independent GH dramatic. For example, activating mutations in the type 1
receptors, promoting dimerization of the receptors and subse- activin A receptor ACVR1 result in severe heterotopic ossifica-
quent association with and activation of Janus kinase (JAK) 2. tion in a disorder known as fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva
Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) undergoes autophosphorylation and con- (FOP). The ligands for these receptors are typically homo- or
currently tyrosine phosphorylates the GH receptors. The latter heterodimers of subunits that have a highly conserved, cyste-
provides a docking site for the signal transducer and activator of ine-dependent structure. TGF-β family receptors bind to
transcription (STAT) factors; STAT 5a and 5b appear to be par- ligands through a heterodimeric receptor consisting of two
ticularly relevant to GH and prolactin action. The STATs are transmembrane subunits known as type I and type II receptors
phosphorylated, dissociate from the GH receptor, migrate to the (Figure 1–12). There are a number of different type I and type
nucleus, and bind to specific STAT-binding DNA regulatory ele- II receptor subunits in this family and type I/type II pairs can
ments (SIE/ISRE/GAS) responsible for transcriptional control of form between several different family members. Both type I
GH target genes such as IGF-1. There are a number of different and type II receptors have an intracellular serine/threonine
STAT family members, and there is specificity of certain cytokine kinase domain. The type II receptor is constitutively phos-
receptors for certain STAT family members. This helps direct the phorylated and active, while the type I receptor is not. The
specificity of signaling by each type of receptor. STAT signaling is ligands in this family initially bind the type II receptor. The
also regulated by a family of inhibitors referred to as suppressor of type I receptor is then recruited to the complex where the type
cytokine signaling (SOCS) proteins. SOCS proteins bind to JAK II receptor kinase phosphorylates and activates the type I
and STAT proteins and target them for degradation. SOCS pro- receptor, which then further propagates the signal. Down-
teins are induced after cytokine/hormone binding and help to stream in the signaling pathway are a group of phosphorylation
autoregulate signaling in this pathway. targets called the Smad proteins. These proteins, upon phos-
phorylation, can migrate to the nucleus to activate and/or
repress transcription of target genes.
TGF-a Receptors Modulators of TGF-β signaling also play critical roles in
These receptors bind a variety of ligands that include the cyto- human disease. Members of the differential screening-selected
kine transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β), the hormones gene in neuroblastoma (DAN) family were originally identified
inhibin, activin, anti-müllerian hormone (AMH), and the as BMP inhibitors and comprise a diverse group of antagonists.
TGF-β
TGF-β
Smad Smad P
FIGURE 1–12 Signaling by the TGF-β receptors. TGF-β ligand first docks with the type II receptor which has an intracellular serine/
threonine kinase domain that is constitutively active. After ligand binding, the type I receptor is then recruited to the complex and the type II
receptor can phosphorylate the intracellular serine/threonine kinase domain of the type I receptor. This then propagates the signal downstream
leading to the phosphorylation and activation of Smad proteins which can migrate to the nucleus and activate or repress gene transcription.
One DAN protein, sclerostin (SOST), is of particular interest proteasome pathway. NF-κB then translocates to the nucleus
because of its key role in regulating osteoblast anabolic function where it regulates gene transcription.
through the LRP5/6 and Frizzled receptors that bind Wnt.
Patients with loss of function mutations in SOST show dramati-
cally increased bone mass and sclerosteosis or van Buchem dis- WNT/Beta Catenin
ease. Antibodies that inhibit sclerostin activity show great Signaling through the Wnt/β-catenin complex is critical for
promise as bone anabolic agents for treating conditions associ- embryonic development and cellular homeostasis. The β-catenin
ated with bone loss.
Ligand
TNF-Receptors
The tumor necrosis factor (TNF) family of receptors is a large TNF-receptor
group of cytokine receptors that bind to both soluble and cell-
membrane-associated ligands. One important member of this Cytoplasm
family is the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B
(RANK) which plays a critical function in the regulation of Degradation
IKK IKK P
bone physiology (see Chapter 8). These receptors consist of a Iκ−B
P
trimeric complex of three single transmembrane receptors that
bind to ligand. The cytoplasmic tail of many TNF-receptors Iκ−B
(including RANK) interacts with a family of adapter molecules Nucleus
NFκ−B NFκ−B
called TNF receptor–associated factors (TRAFs) that further
Activation and/or
activate a number of downstream pathways, the most of repression of
important of which is the activation of nuclear factor kappa B gene
transcription
(NF-κB) (Figure 1–13). Activation of NF-κB is a central event
in many if not all inflammatory responses and leads to the
induction of many molecules including those involved in apop-
totic, cytokine, and chemokine pathways. TNF-receptor signal-
FIGURE 1–13 TNF receptor signaling. TNF binds to a trimolecu-
ing leads to the activation of NF-κB through phosphorylation
lar cell surface receptor which transmits a downstream signal that
of the heterotrimeric I-κB kinase (IKK) complex, which then leads to the phosphorylation and activation of the I-κB kinase (IKK).
phosphorylates the inhibitor of NF-κB (I-κB). I-κB complexes IKK phosphorylates the inhibitor of NF-κB (I-κB) which is then tagged
with NF-κB in the cytosol and keeps it inactive; however, when for degradation through a ubiquitin-dependent proteosomal path-
I-κB is phosphorylated it dissociates from the complex and way. This allows NF-κB to migrate to the nucleus where it can carry
undergoes degradation through the ubiquitin-dependent out activation or repression of gene transcription.
proteins are found in two main complexes: as a cadherin cel- through phosphorylation by glycogen synthase kinase 3 alpha and
lular adhesion protein-bound form in adherens junctions beta (GSK3α and β) and casein kinase I (CKI). This process is
(Figure 1–14A), and in a complex with APC, Axin, and GSK3 as amplified by the scaffolding proteins Disheveled and Axin. These
part of the Wnt signaling pathway (Figure 1–14B). components assemble to create a large complex that marks β-catenin
At the cell membrane, β-catenins serve to promote cell-cell adhe- molecules for subsequent destruction by proteasomes.
sions by linking cadherins to actin filaments (see Figure 1–14A). Recently, the activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in
Mutations in β-catenins appear to play a critical role in the pro- osteocytes has been identified as a critical regulator of anabolic
gression towards cancer by regulating the degradation of the bone activity, while activation of the same pathway in osteoblasts
Wnt/β-catenin complex or by changing cellular adhesion proper- may be responsible for decreased bone resorption. As described
ties. These mutations are found in colorectal, breast, ovarian, and previously, mutations in the Wnt receptor LRP5/6 can also
endometrial cancers. change osteoblast anabolic function, contributing to high bone
Beta-catenin can also be regulated by secreted Wnt proteins, mass (activating mutations in LRP5) and diseases such as osteopo-
providing a key link between extracellular Wnt signaling and activa- rosis-pseudoglioma syndrome (loss of function mutations in
tion of genetic developmental programs (see Figure 1–14B). In the LRP5). These features make the Wnt/β-catenin pathway particu-
Wnt signaling pathway, levels of β-catenins are primarily controlled larly intriguing as a therapeutic target for a wide spectrum of
by ubiquitination and proteosomal degradation. This is triggered disorders.
Cadherin
β-Catenin β-Catenin
α-Catenin α-Catenin
F actin F actin
B Off On
LRP5/6 Wnt LRP5/6
Wnt
Wnt
Frizzled Frizzled
P
CKI P GSK3 l
Dvl Dv
Axin
AP Ub
C β-Catenin
GSK3 PPPP β-Catenin
Axin
β-Catenin β-Trcp
PPPP β-Catenin
CKI
Proteosome
degradation
TLE β-Catenin
TCF TCF
Wnt responsive gene Wnt responsive gene
FIGURE 1–14 Beta-catenin signaling. β-catenin proteins are found in two main signaling complexes: as a cadherin cellular adhesion pro-
tein-bound form in adherens junctions (A) that promotes cell-cell adhesion and as part of the Wnt signaling pathway in a complex associated
with APC, Axin, and GSK3 (B). When the pathway is inactive, the β-catenin complex forms and CKI adds the 4th phosphate, thus activating ubiq-
uitination and subsequent proteasome degradation of β-catenin. Activation of the Wnt signaling receptors Frizzled and LRP5/6 allows unphos-
phorylated β-catenin to enter the nucleus and activate Wnt responsive genes.
GUANYLYL CYCLASE–LINKED The inducible (i) form of NO synthase (NOS-2) is found pre-
dominantly in inflammatory cells of the immune system, although
RECEPTORS it has also been reported to be present in smooth muscle cells of
Activation of guanylyl cyclase–dependent signaling cascades can the vascular wall. Unlike the endothelial form of NO synthase,
occur through two independent mechanisms. The first involves expression of iNO synthase is low in the basal state. Treatment of
activation of the soluble guanylyl cyclase, a heme-containing cells with a variety of cytokines triggers an increase in new iNO
enzyme that is activated by the gas nitric oxide (NO) generated in synthase synthesis (hence, the inducible component of iNO syn-
the same or neighboring cells. NO is produced by the heme-con- thase activity), probably through activation of specific cis elements
taining enzyme nitric oxide synthase. NO synthase exists as three in the iNO synthase promoter. Thus, hormones, cytokines, or
different isozymes in selected body tissues. Constitutive forms of growth factors with the capacity for induction of iNO synthase
NO synthase (NOS) are produced in endothelial (NOS-3) and activity may direct at least a portion of their signaling activity
neuronal (NOS-1) cells. The endothelial enzyme possesses bind- through a cGMP-dependent pathway.
ing sites for FAD and FMN as well as calcium and appears to A third mechanism for increasing cGMP levels within target
require calcium for optimal activity. Endothelial NOS activity is cells involves the activation of particulate guanylyl cyclases
regulated by myristoylation and palmitoylation, which anchor the (Figure 1–16). From an endocrine standpoint, this involves
enzyme in the membrane compartment, and by phosphorylation. predominantly the natriuretic peptide receptors (NPR). NPR-A is
Agents such as bradykinin and acetylcholine, which interact with a single-transmembrane-domain receptor (about 130 kDa) with a
receptors on the surface of endothelial cells and increase intracel- large extracellular domain that provides ligand recognition and
lular calcium levels, trigger an increase in constitutive NO syn- binding. This is followed by a hydrophobic transmembrane
thase activity with consequent generation of NO and activation of domain and a large intracellular domain that harbors the signaling
soluble guanylyl cyclase activity in neighboring vascular smooth function. The amino terminal portion of this intracellular region
muscle cells (Figure 1–15). Thus, in this instance, the cGMP- contains an ATP-binding kinase homology domain (KHD) that is
dependent vasodilatory activity of acetylcholine requires sequen- involved in regulating cyclase activity, whereas the carboxyl termi-
tial waves of signaling activity in two different cell types to realize nal domain contains the catalytic core of the particulate guanylyl
the ultimate physiologic effect. cyclase. It is believed that association of ligand with the
Acetylcholine
Bradykinin
O2 Arginine
NO Citrulline
+
Smooth
NO Soluble GC muscle
Soluble GC
iNOS GTP cGMP
GTP cGMP PKG PKG
−
Vasorelaxation
Steroids
Cytokines
FIGURE 1–15 Signaling through the endothelial (e) and inducible (i) nitric oxide synthases (NOS) in the vascular wall. Activation of eNOS
in the endothelial cell or iNOS in the vascular smooth muscle cell leads to an increase in NO and stimulation of soluble guanylyl cyclase (GC)
activity. Subsequent elevations in cGMP activate cGMP-dependent protein kinase (PKG) and promote vasorelaxation.
signaling cascade. These receptors can be grouped into two major STEROID RECEPTOR FAMILY
subtypes based on shared structural and functional properties. The
first, the steroid receptor family, includes the prototypical glucocor- Steroid receptors (ie, GR, MR, AR, and PR), under basal con-
ticoid receptor (GR) and the receptors for mineralocorticoids (MR), ditions, exist as cytoplasmic, multimeric complexes that
androgens (AR), and progesterone (PR). The second, the thyroid include the heat shock proteins (HSPs) 90, 70, and 56 and
receptor family, includes the thyroid hormone receptor (TR) and immunophilins of the FK506 family (FKBP51 and FKBP52).
the receptors for estrogen (ER), retinoic acid (RAR and RXR), and ER, although demonstrating similar association with HSP, is
vitamin D (VDR) as well as the peroxisome proliferator–activated largely confined to the nuclear compartment. Association of
receptor (PPAR). There are also so-called orphan receptors that bear the steroid ligand with the receptor results in dissociation of
structural homology to members of the extended NR family. For the HSP. This in turn exposes a nuclear translocation signal
many of these, the “ligand” is unknown, and their functional roles previously buried in the receptor structure (near DNA binding
in the regulation of gene expression have yet to be determined. Oth- and hinge regions, see later) and initiates transport of the
ers have been linked to specific ligands. For example, PPARs bind receptor to the nucleus, where it associates with the hormone
to fatty acids, FXR with isoprenoids and bile acids, LXR with oxy- response element (Figure 1–17).
sterols, PXR with steroid metabolites, CAR with xenobiotics, and Each of the family members has been cloned and sequenced,
BXR with folic acid derivatives. In total, there are more than 70 and crystallographic structures have been obtained for many of
nuclear receptors and orphan receptors in humans. them. Consequently, we know a great deal about their structure
H
Plasma membrane
HSP
HSP
R
R
HSP
Protein
H H
R R
mRNA
meG AAAA
Nuclear membrane
pre-mRNA
Core
H H transcription
factors
R R
HRE TATA
FIGURE 1–17 Signaling through the steroid receptor complex. Similar mechanisms are employed by members of the TR gene family,
though most of the latter are concentrated in the nuclear compartment and are not associated with the HSP complex prior to binding ligand
(meG, methyl guanosine).