Professional Documents
Culture Documents
He 2020
He 2020
ScienceDirect
Ziqiang He a,b, Yunfei Yan a,b,*, Shuai Feng a,b, Xiuquan Li a,b,
Ruiming Fang a,b, Zhiliang Ou a,b, Zhongqing Yang a,b
a
Key Laboratory of Low-grade Energy Utilization Technologies and Systems, Chongqing University, Ministry of
Education, Chongqing, 400030, PR China
b
School of Energy and Power Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400030, PR China
highlights
Article history: Targeting at improving the energy output of the micro-thermophotovoltaic (MTPV) system,
Received 28 July 2020 the heat transfer performance and energy output of the conventional micro combustor
Received in revised form (CMC) and the multi-channel micro combustor (MCMC) with various channel shapes in the
4 October 2020 MTPV system are compared. The mean outer wall temperature of the MCMC with diamond
Accepted 19 October 2020 channel is improved by 86.5 K than that of the CMC at the inlet hydrogen mass flow rate
Available online xxx (m_ in;hydrogen ) of 1.64 10-6 kg/s. Furthermore, four arrangements of MCMC are compared in
this work. The double-layer MCMC with layers counterflow exhibits the highest total en-
Keywords: ergy conversion efficiency of 13.2% when the m_ in;hydrogen is 8.10 107 kg/s. The equivalence
MTPV system ratio (F) of premixed hydrogen/air plays a crucial role on the thermal performance of
Micro combustor DMCMC-layer counter flow. The outer wall temperature and its uniformity becomes better
Multi-channel as the equivalence ratio increases. The MPTV system with a DMCMC-layers counterflow
Energy output can obtain an energy output of 19.3 W when the m_ in;hydrogen is 1.64 10-6 kg/s and F is equal
to 1. Namely, the multi-channel micro combustor has the potential to be a novel energy
resource for the MTPV system.
© 2020 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
* Corresponding author. Key Laboratory of Low-grade Energy Utilization Technologies and Systems, Chongqing University, Ministry of
Education, Chongqing, 400030, PR China.
E-mail addresses: he@cqu.edu.cn (Z. He), yunfeiyan@cqu.edu.cn (Y. Yan).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.160
0360-3199/© 2020 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Please cite this article as: He Z et al., Numerical investigation on a multi-channel micro combustor fueled with hydrogen for a micro-
thermophotovoltaic system, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.160
2 international journal of hydrogen energy xxx (xxxx) xxx
Fig. 1 e Schematic diagrams of CMC and a MCMC with various shapes of channels.
Please cite this article as: He Z et al., Numerical investigation on a multi-channel micro combustor fueled with hydrogen for a micro-
thermophotovoltaic system, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.160
international journal of hydrogen energy xxx (xxxx) xxx 3
shaped micro combustor exhibited more uniform tempera- [28,29] investigated the heat transfer characteristics of micro
ture distribution than that of the conventional micro combustors with two channels and four channels. They found
combustor. Additionally, the porous medium was incapable to that the micro combustor with two channels and counterflow
improve the combustion performance, but was effective on exhibited better thermal performance, and the micro
reducing heat loss and improving thermal performance. The combustor with four channels and counterflow was suitable
average external wall temperature in the new combustor with for MTPV system. Su et al. [5] designed a multi cylindrical
double ribs was 11.94 K higher than that of the micro channels fueled with hydrogen for the MTPV system. They
combustor with single rib. Akhtar et al. [24] investigated the obtained a 53.57 W radiation energy which was 6.17 W higher
combustion performance of premixed H2/air in non-circular than that of the conventional designed micro combustor at
micro combustor. The trapezoidal-channel micro combustor the flow rate of 100 cm3/s and equivalence ratio of 0.8. Tang
with low flow rate and triangular-channel micro combustor et al. [30] inserted several separating plates into the micro
with high flow rate showed the highest comprehensive energy combustor for the heat transfer enhancement and obtained
output. Kim et al. [25] investigated the flame characteristics of an approximately 100 K improvement of average external wall
a micro combustor with baffles, and the results showed that temperature than the conventional one. The results showed
the new combustor exhibited the similar reaction structures that the increase of plate numbers could effectively improve
with the swirl combustor. Amani et al. [26] proposed a novel the outer wall temperature, which was suitable for the MTPV
micro combustor combining baffle and cavity, and the average system. Conclusively, it is summarized that the micro
temperature was improved by 36.4 K and the standard devi- combustor with multi channels could effectively improve the
ation was decreased by 13.4 K. Zhang et al. [27] introduced the emitter energy.
high conductivity materials into the micro combustor, and According to the literatures review above, the outer wall
they found that the new micro combustor could obtain an temperature value and its uniformity have significant impact
energy output of 5.2 W when the hydrogen/oxygen equiva- on the energy output of MTPV system. Therefore, to obtain a
lence ratio and inlet velocity were 0.5 and 1 m/s. The radiation higher emitter energy in MTPV system, the thermal and en-
energy output of micro combustor directly determines the ergy performance of a conventional micro combustor (CMC)
energy output of MTPV system. Targeting at obtaining high and a multi-channel micro combustor (MCMC) are compared.
energy output, a series of methods, including internal ribs, Moreover, the shape of channels, the arrangement of chan-
converging-diverging channels, metal foams, which can nels, and equivalence ratio of premixed hydrogen/air in the
effectively improve the thermal performance of micro MCMC were investigated in this paper.
combustor, but with high pressure loss.
Furthermore, a series of studies indicated that the micro
combustor with multi channels can effectively improve the Numerical model
thermal performance comparing the conventional plate micro
combustor. Meanwhile, the multi-channels design brings an The schematic diagrams of the CMC and MCMCs are displayed
acceptable pressure drop for the micro combustor. Zuo et al. in Fig. 1. The overall sizes of both CMC and MCMC are 32 mm
Fig. 2 e Schematic diagrams of MCMCs with various arrangements: (a) MCMC-concurrent flow; (b) MCMC- layers
counterflow; (c) MCMC- each channel counterflow.
Please cite this article as: He Z et al., Numerical investigation on a multi-channel micro combustor fueled with hydrogen for a micro-
thermophotovoltaic system, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.160
4 international journal of hydrogen energy xxx (xxxx) xxx
Species conservation equation: where Awall,i is the area of grid cell i on the outer wall, Twall,i is
the temperature value of grid cell i. Twall,max and Twall,min are
!
V r!
v Yj ¼ V D j þ Rj (3) the maximum and minimum temperature value of the outer
wall.
Energy conservation equation for fluid region:
(a)
Central line temperature (K)
1800
1500
0.09
1200 0.1
1500 900 0.11
Exhaust gas temperature (K)
600
1350
300
1200 1200 (b)
Outer wall temperature (K)
1100
1050
0.09
1000
0.1
900
0.11
Experimental results [21] 900
Please cite this article as: He Z et al., Numerical investigation on a multi-channel micro combustor fueled with hydrogen for a micro-
thermophotovoltaic system, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.160
international journal of hydrogen energy xxx (xxxx) xxx 5
Table 1 e Pressure loss (unit: Pa) in various micro combustors at hydrogen mass flow rate of 1.22 £ 10¡6 kg/s.
Combustor Channel 1 Channel 2 Channel 3 Channel 4 Channel 5 Average
CMC 183.3 183.3
MCMC-circle 277.0 282.0 286.1 282.3 277.2 280.9
MCMC-hexagon 278.0 285.6 286.7 286.1 278.6 283.0
MCMC-square 308.5 316.5 322.1 317.7 306.0 314.2
MCMC-diamond 316.0 322.3 327.1 323.1 317.4 321.2
MCMC-flat-transverse 269.8 283.2 286.2 281.3 217.2 267.6
MCMC-flat-longitude 297.0 304.1 306.4 304.9 297.3 301.9
Table 2 e Pressure loss (unit: Pa) in MCMC-diamond at various mass flow rate.
Mass flow rate Channel 1 Channel 2 Channel 3 Channel 4 Channel 5 Average
8.10 107 kg/s 213.7 223.9 225.5 221.7 211.6 219.3
1.22 106 kg/s 316.0 322.3 327.1 323.1 317.4 321.2
1.64 106 kg/s 465.1 471.1 479.3 473.5 467.2 471.2
The total radiation energy (Qradiation) of micro combustor For the overall MTPV system, the total energy conversion
can be calculated as follow: efficiency of MTPV (htotal) can be calculated as below:
X
Qradiation ¼ εr ,s Awall;i T4wall;i T4∞ (10) QMTPV
htotal ¼ 100% (12)
m_ in;hydrogen QLHV
The total energy output of MTPV system (QMTPV) is defined
where m_ in;hydrogen is the inlet hydrogen mass flow rate and QLHV
as:
is the hydrogen lower heating value, 119.96 MJ/kg [10].
QMTPV ¼ Qradiation ,hMTPV (11) To evaluate the temperature uniformity of micro
combustor outer walls, the non-dimensional temperature
where hMTPV is energy conversion efficiency of MTPV system
uniformity coefficient (Rwall, uniformity) is defined as follow [29]:
for thermal energy into electronic energy, which is equal to
15.4% [14,41]. P Twall;i Taverage
Awall;i Taverage
Rwall;uniformity ¼ P (13)
Awall;i
1120 15.0
(a)
Energy output of MTPV system (W)
1100
13.5
1080
12.0
1060
10.5
1040
9.0
1020
480 (b)
Outer wall temperature difference (K)
7.5
12.0 (b)
440
10.5
400
ηtotal (%)
9.0
360
7.5
320
6.0
CMC MCMC MCMC MCMC MCMC MCMC-flat MCMC-flat
-circle -hexagon -square -diamond -transverse -longitude
CMC MCMC MCMC MCMC MCMC MCMC-flat MCMC-flat
-circle -hexagon -square -diamond -transverse -longitude
Fig. 5 e Influence of the m_ in;hydrogen on outer wall
temperature performance for CMC and MCMC with various Fig. 6 e Influence of the m_ in;hydrogen on energy output of
channel shapes. (a) Mean outer wall temperature; (b) Outer MTPV system for CMC and MCMC with various channel
wall temperature difference. shapes. (a) Energy output of MTPV system; (b) htotal.
Please cite this article as: He Z et al., Numerical investigation on a multi-channel micro combustor fueled with hydrogen for a micro-
thermophotovoltaic system, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.160
6 international journal of hydrogen energy xxx (xxxx) xxx
The equivalence ratio (F) of the premixed hydrogen/air can the CMC with the mesh size of 0.09 mm. The temperature
be calculated below: distribution along the flow path in CMC with mesh size of
0.11 mm shows obvious difference by comparing with the
A0 =F0
F¼ (14) CMC with the mesh size of 0.1 mm and 0.09 mm. Therefore, in
A=F
this work, the mesh size of 0.1 mm is chosen for all cases.
where A0/F0 denotes the stoichiometric mole ratio of air and
fuel and A/F denotes the actual mole flow ratio of air and fuel.
Fig. 3 displays the results of model validation. The mixture Results and discussion
outlet temperature is compared with Wan’s experimental
results [42]. The peak deviation and average deviation be- Comparison between CMC and MCMC with different
tween simulations and experiments are approximately 5% channel shapes
and 3%, respectively. Thus, the above simulation process can
be employed in this work. Table 1 displays the pressure loss in different channels of
Fig. 4(a) and (b) demonstrate the central line temperature various micro combustors under the m_ in;hydrogen of
and the outer wall temperature of the CMC with various mesh 1.22 106 kg/s and F of 0.6. It is observed that the pressure
sizes when the m_ in;hydrogen is 1.22 106 kg/s, respectively. drops in all the MCMC are higher than that of the CMC.
When the mesh sizes are 0.09 mm, 0.1 mm and 0.11 mm, the Comparing the MCMC with different channel shapes, the
mesh numbers are 3,323,998, 2,416,082 and 1,678,436, respec- MCMC-diamond shows the highest pressure loss, follows by
tively. The outer wall temperature of the CMC with various MCMC-square, MCMC-flat-longitude, MCMC-hexagon,
mesh number do not exhibit obvious difference along the MCMC-circle and MCMC-flat-transverse. For the MCMC with
axial direction. Furthermore, for the central line temperature, various channel shapes, the pressure loss of the central
the CMC with the mesh size of 0.1 mm is almost the same with channel always exhibits the highest value, while the pressure
Please cite this article as: He Z et al., Numerical investigation on a multi-channel micro combustor fueled with hydrogen for a micro-
thermophotovoltaic system, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.160
international journal of hydrogen energy xxx (xxxx) xxx 7
1144
heat transfer area than that of the CMC. For the MCMC, under
1140 low m_ in;hydrogen , the MCMC-diamond exhibits the lowest tem-
perature difference. Under high m_ in;hydrogen , the MCMC-
1136
diamond has the highest temperature difference. Compre-
1132 hensively, the temperature difference for MCMC with various
channel shapes are almost the same.
1128
Fig. 6(a) depicts the energy output of MTPV system for CMC
480 and MCMC with various channel shapes. Visibly, the change
(b)
Outer wall temperature difference (K)
Please cite this article as: He Z et al., Numerical investigation on a multi-channel micro combustor fueled with hydrogen for a micro-
thermophotovoltaic system, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.160
8 international journal of hydrogen energy xxx (xxxx) xxx
channel of the MCMC for all cases. The difference between channel micro combustor with concurrent flow or layers
four channel arrangements of MCMC is that the flame counterflow. The results in our study is different from their
spreading directions are different, due to the arrangements of work. The reason is contributed to two factors. One is that the
channel inlet and outlet for various MCMCs. multi-channel design is employed in our work, which induces
Fig. 8(a) and (b) reveals the mean outer wall temperature that the combustion characteristics is different from the four-
and temperature difference of four micro combustors under channel design. Another is that the combustor materials in
various inlet hydrogen mass flow rates. The increase of inlet our work is quartz, while it is steel in Zuo’s work [29]. The
hydrogen will result in the rise of mean outer wall tempera- thermal conductivity of quartz is much lower than the steel,
ture and temperature difference for all cases. Comparing the which is adverse to the heat transfer. Conclusively, the multi-
four design of MCMCs, the DMCMC-layers counterflow ex- channel design with layer counter flow is more suitable for the
hibits the highest mean outer wall temperature and lowest low thermal conductivity and multi channels. Moreover, the
temperature difference, follows by DMCMC-each channel mean outer wall temperature of DMCMC- layers counterflow
counterflow, DMCMC-concurrent flow and SMCMC. Zuo et al. can reach up to 1215.6 K at the m_ in;hydrogen of 1.64 106 kg/s.
[29] found that the four channel with counterflow for each Fig. 9(a) displays outer wall temperature uniformity coef-
channel exhibits the best thermal performance than the four ficient of four arrangements of MCMCs at various inlet
Fig. 9 e The outer wall uniformity of three micro combustors. (a) The non-dimensional temperature uniformity coefficient;
(b) The temperature contours of outer walls of four designs of MCMCs.
Please cite this article as: He Z et al., Numerical investigation on a multi-channel micro combustor fueled with hydrogen for a micro-
thermophotovoltaic system, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.160
international journal of hydrogen energy xxx (xxxx) xxx 9
hydrogen mass flow rates. The lower the non-dimensional designs. For four MCMC designs, the htotal decreases as the
temperature uniformity coefficient is, the more uniform the m_ in;hydrogen increases. The DMCMC-layers counterflow always
outer wall temperature distribution is. Comparing the four exhibits the highest total energy conversion efficiency, follows
designs of multi-channel micro combustor, the DMCMC- by DMCMC-each channel counterflow, DMCMC-concurrent
layers counterflow exhibits the lowest non-dimensional flow and SMCMC. When the m_ in;hydrogen is 8.10 107 kg/s,
temperature uniformity coefficient, follows by DMCMC-each the DMCMC-layers counterflow exhibits the highest total en-
channel counterflow, DMCMC-concurrent flow and SMCMC. ergy conversion efficiency of 13.2%.
It means that the DMCMC- layers counterflow has the most
uniform outer wall distribution among four designs. Fig. 9(b) Influence of equivalence ratio
depictures outer wall temperature distribution of four
MCMCs. It is noted that the high temperature region in the As is known, the equivalence ratio plays a significant role on
SMCMC is the largest. Comparing the DMCMC-layers coun- the combustion characteristics. To investigated the influence
terflow and DMCMC-concurrent flow, it is demonstrated that of the equivalence ratio on the thermal performance of the
the high temperature region of the DMCMC-layers counter- DMCMC-layers counterflow. In this part, F changes from 0.5 to
flow is obvious smaller than that of the DMCMC-concurrent 1 with a step of 0.1 when the m_ in;hydrogen is kept at 1.64 106 kg/
flow. It means that the DMCMC-layers counterflow can s. Fig. 11(a) demonstrates the mean outer wall temperature of
effectively improve the temperature uniformity than that of the DMCMC-layers counterflow at various inlet hydrogen
the DMCMC-concurrent flow. For the DMCMC-each channel mass flow rates. The mean outer wall temperature increases
counterflow, the high temperature region occurs alternatively as the growth of m_ in;hydrogen . When the F is equal to 1, the mean
after the inlet for each channel. Conclusively, the DMCMC- outer wall temperature reaches up to the peak value of
layers counterflow design can effectively improve the tem- 1157.1 K. Since the m_ in;hydrogen is fixed, the reduction of F means
perature uniformity.
the increase of inlet air mass flow rate. The increase premixed
Fig. 10(a) reveals energy output of MTPV system for four
MCMC designs when the inlet hydrogen mass flow rates are
8.10 107 kg/s, 1.22 106 kg/s and 1.64 106 kg/s,
respectively. It is demonstrated that the energy output of
MTPV system increases with the rise of the m_ in;hydrogen . The
DMCMC-layers counterflow exhibits the highest energy
output of 18.6 W at the m_ in;hydrogen of 1.64 106 kg/s. This is
due to that the DMCMC-layers counterflow has the highest
mean outer wall temperature and the most uniform temper-
ature distribution. Fig. 10(b) displays the htotal for four MCMC
16.5
15.0
13.5
12.0
10.5
13.5
(b)
12.0
10.5
ηtotal (%)
9.0
7.5
Please cite this article as: He Z et al., Numerical investigation on a multi-channel micro combustor fueled with hydrogen for a micro-
thermophotovoltaic system, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.160
10 international journal of hydrogen energy xxx (xxxx) xxx
air/hydrogen mass flow rate also increases with the rise of F. the lowest temperature and highest temperature increase
As is known, hydrogen is a very easy-burn fuel, which can with the rise of the F. The increment of the lowest temper-
obtain a high combustion efficiency [3,10]. Thus, more inlet ature is obvious higher than that of the highest temperature.
premixed air/hydrogen mass flow rate will bring more ther- According to Fig. 12(a), the temperature non-uniformity
mal energy out of the micro combustor. That is why the mean mainly occurs in the location of 0 x 8 mm, while the
outer wall temperature increases as the F increases. Fig. 11(b) temperature is around 1175 K at the location of
shows the outer wall temperature difference of the DMCMC- 8 mm x 32 mm. Fig. 12(b) displays the temperature fields
layers counterflow at various equivalence ratios. It is of the central surface for the DMCMC-layers counterflow at
observed that the temperature difference decreases as the F various equivalence ratios. It is noted that the high temper-
increases. When the F is 1, the temperature difference of ature region occurs in the upstream of the channels. As the F
outer wall reaches to its minimum value of 216.7 K. Fig. 11(c) increases, the high temperature region becomes smaller.
depictures the temperature uniformity coefficient for the Meanwhile, the peak value also becomes higher as F rises.
DMCMC-layers counterflow under different equivalence ra- The outer wall temperature in the DMCMC-layers counter-
tios. The temperature uniformity coefficient exhibits the same flow is determined by the heat transfer between combustor
change tendency as the outer wall temperature difference. As wall and the mixture gas. The higher temperature gas at the
the F increases from 0.5 to 1, the temperature uniformity equivalence ratio of 1 will enhance the heat transfer, which
coefficient decreases from 2.76% to 2.48%. Generally, the will improve the outer wall temperature. That is why the
temperature distribution of the outer wall becomes more minimum temperature and maximum temperature of cen-
uniform as the equivalence ratio rises. tral line temperature in Fig. 12(a) will increase with the
Fig. 12(a) reveals the central line temperature distribution growth of equivalence ratio.
of the DMCMC-layers counterflow outer wall for various Fig. 13(a) compared the energy output of MTPV system
equivalence ratios. It is noted that the lowest temperature at various equivalence ratios at the m_ in;hydrogen of
occurs on the wall near the inlet. This is because of that the 1.64 106 kg/s. The energy output of the MTPV system
inlet gas has the lowest temperature. The highest tempera- increases with the growth of F. When the F increases from
ture occurs on the location around 4 mm. This is due to that 0.5 to 1, the MTPV system energy output increases from
the flame front attaching to the combustor inner wall. It will 18.5 W to 19.3 W. Fig. 13(b) displays the htotal at different
bring a highest outer wall temperature. It is noted that both equivalence ratios. The htotal also shows the same change
tendency of the energy output of MTPV system. This is due
to that the energy output and total energy conversion ef-
ficiency are determined by the temperature value and
uniformity of outer walls. When the F is 1, the htotal rea-
ches to the peak value of 9.7%.
(a)
19.2
Energy output of MTPV system (W)
18.9
18.6
18.3
18.0
(b)
9.6
9.4
ηtotal (%)
9.2
Please cite this article as: He Z et al., Numerical investigation on a multi-channel micro combustor fueled with hydrogen for a micro-
thermophotovoltaic system, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.160
international journal of hydrogen energy xxx (xxxx) xxx 11
Please cite this article as: He Z et al., Numerical investigation on a multi-channel micro combustor fueled with hydrogen for a micro-
thermophotovoltaic system, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.160
12 international journal of hydrogen energy xxx (xxxx) xxx
[18] Ni S, Zhao D, Sun Y, et al. Numerical and entropy studies of parallel separating plates. Int J Hydrogen Energy
hydrogen-fuelled micro-combustors with different 2015;40:2396e403.
geometric shaped ribs. Int J Hydrogen Energy [31] He Z, Yan Y, Feng S, et al. Investigation on premixed
2019;44:7692e705. methane/air combustion characteristics in heat recirculation
[19] Yang X, He Z, Dong S, et al. Enhancement of thermal micro combustor with separating cylinder. Chem Eng
performance by converging-diverging channel in a micro Process - Process Intensification 2020:107987.
tube combustor fueled by premixed hydrogen/air. Int J [32] Yan Y, He Z, Xu Q, et al. Numerical study on premixed
Hydrogen Energy 2019;44:1213e26. hydrogen/air combustion characteristics in
Capeletto CA, Santos VGS, et al. Numerical
[20] Fontana E, microecombustor with slits on both sides of the bluff body.
analysis of heat recuperation in micro-combustors using Int J Hydrogen Energy 2019;44:1998e2012.
internal recirculation. Chem Eng Sci 2020;211:115301. [33] Zuo W, Li J, Zhang Y, et al. Effects of multi-factors on
[21] Hiranandani K, Aravind B, Ratna Kishore V, et al. comprehensive performance of a hydrogen-fueled micro-
Development of a numerical model for performance cylindrical combustor by combining grey relational analysis
prediction of an integrated microcombustor-thermoelectric and analysis of variance. Energy 2020;199:117439.
power generator. Energy 2020;192:116624. [34] Zuo W, Li Q, He Z, et al. Numerical investigations on thermal
[22] Alipoor A, Saidi MH. Numerical study of hydrogen-air performance enhancement of hydrogen-fueled micro planar
combustion characteristics in a novel micro- combustors with injectors for micro-thermophotovoltaic
thermophotovoltaic power generator. Appl Energy applications. Energy 2020;194:116904.
2017;199:382e99. [35] Pashchenko D. Hydrogen-rich fuel combustion in a swirling
[23] Ni S, Zhao D, Becker S, et al. Thermodynamics and entropy flame: CFD-modeling with experimental verification. Int J
generation studies of a T-shaped micro-combustor: effects of Hydrogen Energy 2020;45:19996e20003.
porous medium and ring-shaped ribs. Appl Therm Eng [36] Bani S, Pan J, Tang A, et al. Numerical investigation of key
2020;175:115374. parameters of the porous media combustion based Micro-
[24] Akhtar S, Kurnia JC, Shamim T. A three-dimensional Thermophotovoltaic system. Energy 2018;157:969e78.
computational model of H2eair premixed combustion in [37] Zhang Z, Wu K, Yao W, et al. Enhancement of combustion
non-circular micro-channels for a thermo-photovoltaic (TPV) performance in a microchannel: synergistic effects of bluff-
application. Appl Energy 2015;152:47e57. body and cavity. Fuel 2020;265:116940.
[25] Kim WH, Park TS. Flame characteristics depending on [38] Zuo W, Jiaqiang E, Liu H, et al. Numerical investigations on
recirculating flows in a non-premixed micro combustor with an improved micro-cylindrical combustor with rectangular
varying baffles. Appl Therm Eng 2019;148:591e608. rib for enhancing heat transfer. Appl Energy 2016;184:77e87.
[26] Amani E, Daneshgar A, Hemmatzade A. A novel combined [39] Yang WM, Chou SK, Shu C, et al. Development of a prototype
baffle-cavity micro-combustor configuration for Micro- micro-thermophotovoltaic power generator. J Phys Appl
Thermo-Photo-Voltaic applications. Chin J Chem Eng Phys 2004;37:1017e20.
2020;28(2):403e13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2019.05.002. [40] Pashchenko D. Comparative analysis of hydrogen/air
[27] Zhang Y, Pan J, Zhu Y, et al. The effect of embedded high combustion CFD-modeling for 3D and 2D computational
thermal conductivity material on combustion performance domain of micro-cylindrical combustor. Int J Hydrogen
of catalytic micro combustor. Energy Convers Manag Energy 2017;42:29545e56.
2018;174:730e8. [41] Xue H, Yang W, Chou SK, et al. Microthermophotovoltaics
[28] Zuo W, Jiaqiang E, Lin R. Numerical investigations on an power system for portable MEMS devices. Microscale
improved counterflow double-channel micro combustor Thermophys Eng 2005;9:85e97.
fueled with hydrogen for enhancing thermal performance. [42] Wan J, Fan A, Maruta K, et al. Experimental and numerical
Energy Convers Manag 2018;159:163e74. investigation on combustion characteristics of premixed
[29] Zuo W, Jiaqiang E, Han D, et al. Numerical investigations on hydrogen/air flame in a micro-combustor with a bluff body.
thermal performance of double-layer four-channel micro Int J Hydrogen Energy 2012;37:19190e7.
combustors for micro-thermophotovoltaic system. Energy [43] Fathy A, Elaziz MA, Sayed ET, et al. Optimal parameter
Convers Manag 2017;150:343e55. identification of triple-junction photovoltaic panel based on
[30] Tang A, Pan J, Yang W, et al. Numerical study of premixed enhanced moth search algorithm. Energy 2019;188:116025.
hydrogen/air combustion in a micro planar combustor with
Please cite this article as: He Z et al., Numerical investigation on a multi-channel micro combustor fueled with hydrogen for a micro-
thermophotovoltaic system, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.160