Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture 9 Slim Hole Drilling 7
Lecture 9 Slim Hole Drilling 7
Lecture 9 Slim Hole Drilling 7
BY
Prof. A.K.Pathak
Department of Petroleum Engineering
Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines), Dhanbad
E-mail: akhilendra56@iitism.ac.in
INTRODUCTION:
Slim hole is a drilling, evaluation and completion technology which allows fully engineered 6 ¼” and
smaller holes at target depth. The well drilled using this technology is called a slim line well, which is a
well with a cost effective design around an optimal production. All logging tools smaller than 4 ¾” or
minimum 2 7/8” size can be used while using this technology.
Each slim hole is drilled with a small, truck-mounted rotary drill rig or coring rig similar to those used for
water well drilling. The rigs are equipped with diesel engines, storage tanks, mud pumps, and other
typical auxiliary equipment. During drilling, the top of the drill rig derrick is 30 to 40 feet above the ground
surface. Drilling is typically conducted 24 X 7days.
The drilling program involves a sequence of drilling or “coring” a hole to a selected depth, cementing a
steel casing of smaller diameter into the drilled hole, then repeating the process with progressively
smaller holes and cemented casings. This is done at progressively greater depths until the design depth
(or the depth selected by the project geologist) is reached. The initial casing is approximately 8-5/8
inches in diameter.
The hole is drilled or “cored” using special, non-toxic drilling mud composed of a bentonite clay-water or
polymer-water mix. The drilling mud helps to circulate the rock cuttings to the surface where they are
removed by the surface equipment. The drilling mud or other drilling fluids would then be re-circulated.
Compressed air may be used to reduce the weight of the drilling mud in the hole and assist in carrying the
cuttings to the surface in some circumstances. The air, drilling mud, cuttings, and any reservoir fluids
brought to the surface are then diverted through a separator/muffler to separate and discharge the air and
water vapor to the air and the drilling mud and cuttings to a plastic-lined reserve pit.
Once drilled to the final depth, the drilling mud in the hole is circulated out using water. Steel tubing,
typically 2-3/8 inches in diameter and perforated at the bottom, is hung in the hole. The water in the hole
is “bailed” by either lifting with a mechanical bailer (basically a small diameter bucket) or by lifting the
water out with air pumped into the hole so that a sample of the geothermal fluid in the reservoir can be
obtained for chemical analysis.
Slim Hole Monitoring: Following completion of drilling and bailing, all drilling equipment is removed from
the site. The surface facilities remaining on the site consist only of several valves on top of the surface
casing, covered by a locked steel canister approximately three feet in diameter and up to six feet high
which provides protection for the valves
The drilling of each small observation hole is expected to take 25 days, while larger exploration wells
generally take 35 days. Once drilling begins, it is possible that difficulties encountered during drilling may
extend the time needed to complete the drilling. Work is typically performed at the drilling site 24-hours
per day, 7-days per week.
By the use of Slim Hole technology, operators can reduce well costs 40 to 70%, plus reduce
environmental costs and concerns. Tools and equipment exist and operations can be performed safely.
Experience indicates that slim holes do not usually restrict production. Slim holes were used as early as
1960 in the U.S. Over 1,300 wells were drilled in the 1,000 to 3,000 ft range in Kansas, Texas and
1
Department of Petroleum Engineering
Indian Institute of Technology (ISM), Dhanbad – 826004
VI Semester B.Tech Petroleum Engineering 2023-24
Canada using slim-hole 2 ½- to 2 7/8-in casing and 1-in EUE hollow sucker rod tubing. Operators realized
a 40 to 50% reduction in tubular costs and 17% cost savings overall.
There are several documented examples from later slim-hole drilling programs. Conoco used slim-hole
drilling in Indonesia in the 1983 to 1986 time frame, realizing cost reductions of 65 to 73%. In the early
1990s, Oryx realized 50% cost savings in an eight-well, slim-hole re-entry program. In Thailand, Unocal
used slim-holes in its Gulf of Thailand operations in 1999, realizing over 40% savings. Productivity of
Unocal's slim-hole wells has exceeded that experienced with conventional wells. Pemex realized 30%
cost savings in a late 1990s slim-hole drilling program. But success is not guaranteed. In a three-well
slim-hole drilling program in Wyoming's Powder River basin, Domain Energy successfully completed slim-
hole wells, but twist-off due to stabilizer torque problems eliminated any cost savings.
There have been sufficient slim-hole drilling programs to establish the following. Areas that are not
concerns include logging, perforating, tubing buckling and sticking, wellhead design, and BHA design.
Concerns, which experience indicates can be solved, still include:
1. Casing program, 2. Drill string torsional strength, 3. Fishing and milling,
4. Lost circulation, 5. Bit design and reliability 6. Down hole motors,
7. Cementing, 8. Stimulation 9. Workovers.
Slim hole drilling decreases drilling waste volumes and requires smaller operational footprints. DOE cites
the example of a slim hole drilled to 14,760 ft ending with a 4 1/8-in. hole. The volume of cuttings
produced in such a well is one third less than that of a standard well at the same depth. Since equipment
used for slim hole drilling can be smaller than conventional rigs, the area cleared for a location can be as
small as 9,000 sq ft, including mud pits. That’s about one-fourth the size of a conventional location.
Slimhole drilling costs are typically only a fraction of large-diameter rotary drilled wells (Finger, 1998;
Goranson, 1998). The relative portability of the small rigs used to drill slim holes should prove
economically advantageous in remote locations. Furthermore, the environmental impact and land-use
requirements of the minerals style slim hole drilling operations are much less than for conventional rotary
drilling. To-date, wire line-cored and rotary drilled slim holes have been used primarily for geothermal
exploration and reservoir assessment in many parts of the world.
Advanced technology makes drilling operations steadily more efficient in recovering oil and gas
resources, cleaner, and safer. Environmental benefits: reduced waste and smaller footprints. And
because the joint connection operations of a conventional drill string are not required, noise levels are
reduced as well. Of course, like any technology that permits drilling highly deviated wells, slimhole drilling
can be used to avoid environmentally sensitive areas by using directional drilling techniques. Saving
weight and space is a never-ending challenge for designers and operators of all types of rigs. The latest
advance in this quest is lighter modular rigs that make use of lighter, stronger materials. They can be
especially useful in remote locations.
2
Department of Petroleum Engineering
Indian Institute of Technology (ISM), Dhanbad – 826004
VI Semester B.Tech Petroleum Engineering 2023-24
Both Saudi Armco and Total Indonesia found benefits in electing 4 in. drill pipe with streamlined double
shoulder connections for the drilling of wells, for which the 3 ½ in. drill pipe was unsuitable. Although
dealing with different environments and applications, these benefits can be summarized in “successfully
drilling longer slim holes with a drill string having enhanced torsional, tensile and hydraulic Characteristics
at a lower overall cost”.
:
The above figure depicts the difference in completion technology for a conventional and a typical 3 ½”
monobore (slim line well). The additional tools required for the slim hole completion are PBR tieback and
liner hanger, retrievable straddle and retrievable or permanent bridge plug and standard thrusters ( to
reduce the variations in hook load).
The sequence of placement (surface to TD) of
Equipments: standard flow control equipment side pocket mandrels liner hanger with tubing tieback
straddlebridge plug.
Tubular: drill pipe drill collarsthrusters mud motors bit.
The following figure shows the impact on environment
.
An exploratory boring or "slim hole" technique that uses a down hole test tool provides hydrological data
in significantly less time and cost than the conventional pilot well alternative. The conventional method of
drilling a large-diameter pilot well can prove expensive when poor water quality or inadequate production
rates force drillers to abandon a drilling site. The cost difference between the two methods is substantial:
US$30,000 for a 1,200-ft exploratory borehole analysis compared to US$ 150,000 for the pilot hole
analysis at the same depth. Rather than a 17.5-inch diameter hole, the exploratory borehole, using
standard mud-rotary drilling techniques (no air line), measures approximately 6.5 inches in diameter. This
offers significant cost and time savings and provides accurate logging results.
3
Department of Petroleum Engineering
Indian Institute of Technology (ISM), Dhanbad – 826004
VI Semester B.Tech Petroleum Engineering 2023-24
10. Smaller crew required for operation and maintenance
11. Reduced tonnage, location, construction work
12. Reduced driving hazards 13. Anti-vibrational technology
14. Easier well kick detection 15. Good quality logs.
The conventional technology limits oil recovery to 40 % of the total oil originally in place for existing
reservoirs on a world wide basis. Next 20 % will be bypassed and further 20 % will be residual oil
saturation.But with the application of slim hole technology recovery of half of the remaining 20% oil can
increase recoverable reserves by 50%.
4
Department of Petroleum Engineering
Indian Institute of Technology (ISM), Dhanbad – 826004
VI Semester B.Tech Petroleum Engineering 2023-24
Negative Learning:
Poor hydraulics Unable to get desired mud weight
Hole erosion due to higher annular velocity Limited choice of bits
Requirement of non-standard tools The 3 ½” logging tool was unsuitable for 4 ¼” hole
5
Department of Petroleum Engineering
Indian Institute of Technology (ISM), Dhanbad – 826004
VI Semester B.Tech Petroleum Engineering 2023-24
Highlights:
There was a significant decline in the cost of the
wells drilled by the application of the slim hole
drilling technique as is depicted by the adjacent
figure.
Apart from the usual benefits observed, this
particular project also showed that if proper
precautions are taken then excellent well logs and
early kick detection and control can be obtained
even while using slim hole technology. However
some of the drawbacks that came into picture were
too high bit TFA and poor bit selection, requirement
of assorted rig packages and special mud pumps
for cementing.
Highlights: In this project at Germany, a comparison was studied between three wells of different well
bore sizes. It was found that for same target depth of 5000 m , well cost decreased from 100% to 60%
and cuttings volume decreased from 100% to 30% when the completion was reduced from 7” to 3 ½”
Slim Hole.
6
Department of Petroleum Engineering
Indian Institute of Technology (ISM), Dhanbad – 826004
VI Semester B.Tech Petroleum Engineering 2023-24
Short Answer Questions
1. What is a Slim Hole?
2. What are the basic differences between a slim well and a conventional size well?
3. What are basic factors to be considered for planning a Slim hole?
4. What are different types of Slim Hole Drilling?
5. What are applications of Slime Hole Technology?
6. Compare the casing program of a conventional well and a Slim Hole well?
7. Compare site utilization wise between a conventional well and a Slime hole well?
8. Compare the production rate wise a conventional well to a Slime hole well?
9. What are advantages of Slim Hole well and conventional well?