1 s2.0 S0741521416318535 Main

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 11

From the Midwestern Vascular Surgical Society

Clinical presentation and management of arterial thoracic


outlet syndrome
Chandu Vemuri, MD, Lauren N. McLaughlin, ACNP, Ahmmad A. Abuirqeba, BA, and
Robert W. Thompson, MD, St. Louis, Mo

ABSTRACT
Objective: Arterial thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a rare condition characterized by subclavian artery pathology
associated with a bony abnormality. This study assessed contemporary clinical management of arterial TOS at a high-
volume referral center.
Methods: A prospectively maintained database was used to conduct a retrospective review of patients undergoing
primary or reoperative treatment for arterial TOS during an 8-year period (2008 to 2016). Presenting characteristics,
operative findings, and clinical and functional outcomes were evaluated.
Results: Forty patients underwent surgical treatment for arterial TOS, representing 3% of 1401 patients undergoing oper-
ations for all forms of TOS during the same interval. Patients were a mean age of 40.3 6 2.2 years (range, 13-68 years), and
72% were women. More than half presented with upper extremity ischemia/emboli (n ¼ 21) or posterior stroke (n ¼ 2),
including eight that had required urgent brachial artery thromboembolectomy. The presentation in 17 (42%) was
nonvascular, with 11 having symptoms of neurogenic TOS and six having an asymptomatic neck mass or incidentally
discovered subclavian artery dilatation. All patients underwent thoracic outlet decompression (25 supraclavicular, 15 para-
clavicular), of which there were 30 (75%) with a cervical rib (24 complete, 6 partial), 5 with a first rib abnormality, 4 with a
clavicle fracture, and 1 (reoperation) with no remaining bone abnormality. Subclavian artery reconstruction was performed
in 70% (26 bypass grafts, 1 patch, 1 suture repair), and 30% had mild subclavian artery dilatation (<100%) requiring no arterial
reconstruction. Mean postoperative length of stay was 5.4 6 0.6 days. During a mean follow-up of 4.5 6 0.4 years (range, 0.9-
8.1 years), subclavian artery patency was 92%, none had further dilatation or embolism, and chronic symptoms were present
in six (4 postischemic/vasospasm, 2 neurogenic). Functional outcomes measured by scores on the 11-item version of the
Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure improved from 39.1 6 3.8 to 19.2 6 2.7 (P < .0001).
Conclusions: This relatively large single-institution series demonstrates the diverse clinical presentation of arterial TOS
coincident with a spectrum of bony and arterial pathology. Current surgical protocols can achieve excellent outcomes for
this rare and often complicated condition. (J Vasc Surg 2017;65:1429-39.)

One hundred years ago, Dr William Halsted presented the unique pathophysiologic implications of this re-
the first large collected clinical series of patients with lationship and defined poststenotic dilatation as a
subclavian artery aneurysms in association with cervical distinct mechanism of aneurysm formation.2-4 Subcla-
rib anomalies.1 He and others subsequently investigated vian artery aneurysms and other pathologic lesions are
now recognized as part of the spectrum of conditions
known as thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS), which in-
From the Center for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome and the Section of Vascular cludes brachial plexus compression (neurogenic TOS)
Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School
and subclavian vein effort thrombosis (venous TOS).5
of Medicine.
This work was partly supported by the Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Research and
Arterial TOS is the least frequent form of these condi-
Education Fund of the Barnes-Jewish Hospital Foundation, St. Louis, Mo. tions, but its clinical presentation is distinguished by
Author conflict of interest: none. the potential for life- and limb-threatening thromboem-
Presented at the Fortieth Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Vascular Surgical bolic complications.6-16
Society, Columbus, Ohio, September 8-10, 2016.
In 2008 we established a multidisciplinary center
Correspondence: Robert W. Thompson, MD, Center for Thoracic Outlet Syn-
drome, Section of Vascular Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School
approach to focus on TOS to standardize and optimize
of Medicine, 5101 Queeny Tower, One Barnes-Jewish Hospital Plaza, Campus protocols for the evaluation and treatment of all forms
Box 8109, St. Louis, MO 63110 (e-mail: thompson@wudosis.wustl.edu). of TOS. The purpose of this study was to assess the pre-
The editors and reviewers of this article have no relevant financial relationships to senting characteristics and contemporary management
disclose per the JVS policy that requires reviewers to decline review of any
of arterial TOS at a single high-volume referral center.17,18
manuscript for which they may have a conflict of interest.
0741-5214
Copyright Ó 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the So-
ciety for Vascular Surgery. This is an open access article under the CC BY-
METHODS
NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). All patients in this study gave informed consent for the
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2016.11.039 publication of their medical data through a protocol

1429
1430 Vemuri et al Journal of Vascular Surgery
May 2017

approved by the Human Research Protection Office at


Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Mo. ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS
d
Type of Research: Single center retrospective cohort
Patient population, inclusion and exclusion criteria.
study
Patients treated for arterial TOS were identified using a d
Take Home Message: In 40 patients with arterial
prospectively maintained database of all patients treated
thoracic outlet syndrome, excellent results, including
at the Washington University in St. Louis Center for
a 92% subclavian artery/graft patency at 4.5 years,
Thoracic Outlet Syndrome at Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St.
and equally excellent functional outcome could be
Louis, Mo, from January 2008 through December 2016.
achieved.
Arterial TOS was defined as the existence of subclavian d
Recommendation: This study suggests a distinct
artery pathology (aneurysmal dilatation, occlusion, steno-
surgical protocol to achieve excellent outcomes for
sis, or embolizing ulceration) in the presence of a
patients with arterial thoracic outlet syndrome.
congenital or acquired bony abnormality within the
thoracic outlet. These bony abnormalities included
congenital cervical rib or hypoplastic first rib anomalies
with complete anterior and middle scalenectomy, brachial
and acquired fractures of the clavicle or first rib, as evident
plexus neurolysis, and resection of the cervical rib and first
on plain radiographic studies before the operation.
rib.20 Direct surgical repair of the subclavian artery was
The study excluded patients with subclavian artery
performed in the same operation for subclavian artery
pathology not associated with a bony abnormality and
aneurysms with a diameter 100% greater than the unaf-
patients with compressive arterial lesions confined to
fected proximal subclavian artery, embolizing lesions, or for
the axillary artery or its branches. Patients presenting
thrombotic occlusion, but repair was not performed for
with symptoms of neurogenic TOS associated with a
poststenotic subclavian artery dilatation <100%.
bony abnormality who were subsequently found to
When distal control of the subclavian artery could not
have coincident subclavian artery pathology were
be obtained from the supraclavicular incision alone, a
included, as were patients with incidentally identified
lateral infraclavicular incision was added for exposure
asymptomatic subclavian artery lesions in the presence
and control of the axillary artery.21 For arterial repair,
of a previously unrecognized bony abnormality. Patients
the distal anastomosis was performed first, followed
with a clinical examination demonstrating neurogenic
by the proximal anastomosis, by using end-to-end inter-
TOS and only positional compression of the subclavian
position grafting technique. The preferred conduits for
artery were excluded, as were patients with neurogenic
repair included cryopreserved femoral artery, cryopre-
TOS accompanied by peripheral (hand or finger) vaso-
served femoral vein, or woven Dacron (DuPont, Wil-
constriction caused by sympathetic overactivity but
mington, Del).
with no subclavian artery pathology.

Clinical management protocol. Patients presenting Outcomes measures. Hospital length of stay and post-
with acute upper extremity ischemia were treated with operative complications were recorded. Clinical assess-
urgent brachial artery thromboembolectomy, with or ment of the results for arterial reconstruction included
without adjunctive thrombolytic therapy, at our medical examination for any evidence of digital emboli or is-
center or at the hospital of origin, followed by maintenance chemia, bilateral upper extremity blood pressures, and
anticoagulation and evaluation for subclavian artery pa- pulse waveforms on noninvasive vascular laboratory
thology and arterial TOS. Those found to have arterial testing or imaging studies (MRA, CTA, or catheter-
TOS underwent surgical treatment, typically within several based arteriography), when indicated. Outcomes were
days to weeks of their initial presentation. Asymptomatic also assessed using several patient-reported survey in-
individuals and patients presenting with neurogenic TOS struments previously used in the assessment of patients
who were found to have bony abnormalities and overt sub- with TOS, including the 11-item version of the Disability
clavian artery lesions underwent elective surgical treat- of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) Outcome
ment for arterial TOS. Radiographic assessment for bony Measure (scale 0-100), the Cervical-Brachial Symptom
abnormalities included anterior-posterior chest x-ray im- Questionnaire (CBSQ; scale 0-100), and the McGill Pain
aging and computed tomography (CT) scans. Assessment Questionnaire, which includes a 10-point visual analog
of the subclavian artery was performed using contrast- scale for pain, the Pain Rating Index, and the Overall
enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), CT Pain Intensity instruments, and is assessed on a 0-100
angiography (CTA) with three-dimensional image recon- scale.22
struction, or direct catheter-based arteriography.19
Statistical analysis. Descriptive data are reported as
Surgical treatment. Surgical treatment for arterial TOS the group percentage or the mean 6 standard error of
consisted of supraclavicular thoracic outlet decompression the mean. Patient-reported outcomes measures were
Journal of Vascular Surgery Vemuri et al 1431
Volume 65, Number 5

Fig 1. Flow diagram describes the presenting characteristics, bony abnormalities, and arterial abnormalities in
40 patients treated for arterial thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS). Rxn, Resection.

compared using two-tailed, unpaired t-tests with the mass or incidentally discovered subclavian artery dilata-
Welch correction. Analyses were conducted using Prism tion, which had led to the recognition of subclavian ar-
6.0 software (GraphPad Software, Inc, La Jolla, Calif). For all tery pathology in association with a bony abnormality. A
tests, a P value of <.05 was considered to be statistically cervical rib was identified by preoperative radiographic
significant. studies in 30 patients (75%), with no difference between
patients with a vascular (74%) or nonvascular (76%) pre-
RESULTS sentation (Fig 3).
Clinical presentation. Forty patients underwent surgi-
cal treatment for arterial TOS from 2008 to 2016, repre- Surgical treatment. All patients underwent thoracic
senting 3% of 1401 patients treated for all forms of TOS outlet decompression. A supraclavicular approach alone
during the same interval (Fig 1). Patients were a mean was used in 25 (65%), and a combined supraclavicular
age of 40.3 6 2.2 years (range, 13-68 years), and 72% were and infraclavicular (paraclavicular) approach was used
women (Table I). Vascular complications were present in in 15 (35%; Table II). There were 30 patients (75%) with a
23 patients (58%), either upper extremity ischemia/ cervical rib (24 complete, 6 partial), 5 with a first rib
emboli (n ¼ 21) or posterior stroke (n ¼ 2), including eight abnormality, 4 with a clavicle fracture, and 1 with no bony
who had recently required urgent brachial artery abnormality (a reoperative procedure in which the cer-
thromboembolectomy (3 with adjunctive use of throm- vical and first ribs had been previously removed). Nine-
bolytic therapy; Fig 2). The presentation was nonvascular teen patients (48%) had a large post-stenotic subclavian
in 17 patients (42%), including 11 with primary symptoms artery aneurysm, 7 (17%) had thrombosis of the subcla-
of neurogenic TOS and six with an asymptomatic neck vian artery, and 11 (28%) had poststenotic subclavian
1432 Vemuri et al Journal of Vascular Surgery
May 2017

Table I. Presenting characteristics in patients with arterial subsequent balloon angioplasty for an anastomotic ste-
thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) nosis identified on follow-up arteriography, and two
Vascular Nonvascular Total other patients underwent operative revision for an
Characteristica (n ¼ 23) (n ¼ 17) (N ¼ 40) occluded bypass graft (Table IV). At the end of follow-
Age, years 40.3 6 2.4 40.2 6 4.0 40.3 6 2.2 up, the subclavian artery was patent in 38 patients
Female gender, % 15 (65) 14 (82) 29 (72) (92%), with three having had bypass graft occlusion
Right side affected, % 10 (44) 12 (71) 22 (55) (Table IV). These three individuals had a complicated
Dominant side affected 12 (52) 10 (59) 22 (55)
vascular presentation upon referral: one with previous
brachial artery thromboembolism and treatment with
Ischemia/emboli 21 (91) 0 (0) 21 (52)
multiple subclavian artery stents, one with recent
Posterior stroke 2 (9) 0 (0) 2 (5)
brachial artery thromboembolectomy and occlusion of
Neurogenic TOS 0 (0) 11 (65) 11 (28)
a previous subclavian artery bypass graft, and one with
Asymptomatic neck mass 0 (0) 6 (35) 6 (15) several years of arm symptoms caused by chronic throm-
Recurrent arterial TOS 1 (4) 2 (12) 3 (7) boembolism and a recent posterior stroke. Each of these
Recent thrombectomy 8 (35) 0 (0) 8 (20) patients underwent thoracic outlet decompression with
Cervical rib 17 (74) 13 (76) 30 (75) a subclavian artery bypass, of which two eventually
a
Continuous data are shown as the mean 6 standard error of the mean required further reoperations for bypass graft occlusion
and categoric data as number (%) or as indicated. (one successful, one with later rethrombosis). No other
patients had bypass graft stenosis or occlusion, further
subclavian artery dilatation, or thromboembolism.
artery dilatation that did not meet the threshold for
Chronic symptoms were present in six patients (15%),
reconstruction (maximal extent of dilatation was <100%
four with longstanding postischemic symptoms in the
of the normal proximal artery).
hand despite revascularization and two with symptoms
As reported in Table III, operative treatment included
of neurogenic TOS.
complete anterior and middle scalenectomy in all pa-
tients and bone resection in 36 (90%), including com- Functional outcome measures. Patients presenting
bined resection of a cervical rib and first rib in 29 (72%), with arterial TOS exhibited a high level of disability by
resection of a first rib alone in 6 (15%), and resection of functional outcome measures, as reflected by scores
a cervical rib alone in 1 (2%). Direct subclavian artery on the QuickDASH, CBSQ, and McGill Pain Question-
reconstruction was performed in 28 patients (70%), naire (Table V; Fig 5). By these measures, patients
with resection and interposition bypass grafting in 26 presenting with vascular complications also had a
(65%) using cryopreserved femoral artery in 12 (30%), cry- consistently higher level of disability than patients with
opreserved femoral vein in 10 (25%), and woven Dacron in a nonvascular presentation (QuickDASH score: 47.6 6
4 (10%; Fig 4). Endarterectomy for an ulcerated subcla- 4.9 vs 27.3 6 4.8, P ¼ .0056; CBSQ score: 53.8 6 7.6 vs
vian artery plaque was performed in one patient, and 32.1 6 5.9, P ¼ .0316).
suture repair for a pseudoaneurysm was performed Functional outcomes measures were markedly
in another. Seven patients (17%) underwent concomitant improved during postoperative follow-up for the overall
axillary or brachial artery thromboembolectomy at group and also for patients with vascular and non-
the time of subclavian artery reconstruction, but no vascular presentations (Table V; Fig 5). Thus, QuickDASH
thrombolytic agents were administered intraoperatively scores for the entire group were 44% 6 12% lower at
because of the risk of bleeding (Table IV). Twelve patients follow-up than before surgical treatment, and CBSQ
(30%) had no subclavian artery reconstruction, undergo- scores were 59% 6 9% lower. McGill Pain scores were
ing observation alone for a mild extent (<100%) of post- more variable and not affected as substantially, with
stenotic dilatation. scores at follow-up 38% 6 17% lower than before surgical
treatment for the entire group, but there were no differ-
Clinical follow-up. Mean postoperative length of stay was
ences for this measure between the vascular and nonvas-
5.4 6 0.6 days, with no difference between patients with a
cular subgroups.
vascular (5.3 6 0.6 days) or a nonvascular (5.4 6 1.2 days)
presentation. One patient (2%) died of sepsis from an unre-
lated condition #30 days of surgical treatment. One patient DISCUSSION
was readmitted #2 weeks of surgery for nausea and insuffi- In this study we used a relatively strict definition of arte-
cient postoperative pain control, but there were no other rial TOS, with inclusion criteria requiring the presence of
early postoperative complications. a bony abnormality within the thoracic outlet and overt
During a mean follow-up of 4.5 6 0.4 years (median, pathology of the subclavian artery.5 In the past, broader
4.3 years; range, 0.9-8.1 years), there were no deaths or definitions of arterial TOS have often included patients
amputations. Two of the 26 patients who underwent with neurogenic upper extremity symptoms (pain,
subclavian artery bypass graft reconstruction required numbness, and paresthesia) along with positional
Journal of Vascular Surgery Vemuri et al 1433
Volume 65, Number 5

Fig 2. A 28-year-old right-handed man presented with right hand digital ischemia caused by a subclavian
artery aneurysm. A, A right upper extremity arteriogram demonstrated a subclavian artery aneurysm, throm-
boembolic occlusion of the distal brachial artery, and multiple embolic digital artery occlusions. Magnified
arteriographic views of the (B) affected right hand and (C) normal left hand illustrate the differences in
perfusion. D, Ischemic fingertip lesions in the right hand. E, Brachial artery thromboembolectomy and patch
angioplasty repair was initially performed. F, Operative specimens of the cervical and first ribs removed during
supraclavicular thoracic outlet decompression several days after thrombectomy. G, Subclavian artery aneurysm
(SCA) viewed from right supraclavicular exposure. H, The excised specimen of the subclavian artery aneurysm
demonstrated intimal ulceration with thrombus. I, Subclavian artery repair with interposition bypass graft.
(Reprinted with permission from Thompson RW. Management of digital emboli, vasospasm, and ischemia in
ATOS. In: Illig KA, Thompson RW, Freischlag JA, Donahue DM, Jordan SE, Edgelow PI, editors. Thoracic Outlet
Syndrome. London: Springer; 2013: 557-63.)
1434 Vemuri et al Journal of Vascular Surgery
May 2017

Fig 3. Imaging of arterial thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS). A and B, Plain chest radiograph illustrates a right
cervical rib. C and D, Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan with three-dimensional reconstruction
demonstrates a right cervical rib and a poststenotic subclavian artery aneurysm with no mural thrombus.

Table II. Operative findings in patients with arterial thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS)
Variable Vascular (n ¼ 23), No. (%) Nonvascular (n ¼ 17), No. (%) Total (N ¼ 40), No. (%)
Operative approach
Supraclavicular 11 (48) 14 (82) 25 (63)
Paraclavicular 12 (52) 3 (18) 15 (37)
Bone abnormalities
Cervical rib 17 (74) 13 (76) 30 (75)
Complete 14 (61) 10 (59) 24 (60)
Partial 3 (13) 3 (18) 6 (15)
First rib abnormality 3 (13) 2 (12) 5 (12)
Clavicle fracture 2 (9) 2 (12) 4 (10)
No bony abnormality 1 (4) 0 (0) 1 (3)
Subclavian artery abnormalities
Large aneurysm 12 (52) 7 (41) 19 (48)
Thrombosis 7 (24) 0 (0) 7 (18)
Dilatation <100% 2 (9) 9 (53) 11 (27)
Patent previous bypass 1 (4) 0 (0) 1 (3)
Pseudoaneurysm 0 (0) 1 (6) 1 (2)
Ulcerated plaque 1 (4) 0 (0) 1 (3)
Journal of Vascular Surgery Vemuri et al 1435
Volume 65, Number 5

Table III. Operative treatment in patients with arterial thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS)
Variablea Vascular (n ¼ 23) Nonvascular (n ¼ 17) Total (N ¼ 40)
Scalene muscle resection
Anterior scalene weight, grams 5.7 6 0.4 5.5 6 0.4 5.6 6 0.3
Middle scalene weight, grams 4.5 6 0.9 4.5 6 0.6 4.4 6 0.6
Bone resection
First rib and cervical rib 16 (70) 13 (76) 29 (73)
Cervical rib alone 1 (4) 0 (0) 1 (2)
First rib alone 4 (17) 2 (12) 6 (15)
No bone resection 2 (9) 2 (12) 4 (10)
Subclavian artery reconstruction
Resection and bypass graft 19 (83) 7 (41) 26 (66)
Cryopreserved artery 9 (39) 3 (18) 12 (30)
Cryopreserved vein 8 (35) 2 (12) 10 (25)
Dacronb 2 (9) 2 (12) 4 (10)
Endarterectomy alone 1 (4) 0 (0) 1 (2)
Suture repair alone 0 (0) 1 (6) 1 (2)
Observation alone 3 (13) 9 (53) 12 (30)
a
Continuous data are presented as the mean 6 standard error of the mean and categoric data as number (%).
b
DuPont, Wilmington, Del.

Fig 4. Subclavian artery reconstruction is shown in a 20-year-old woman with an asymptomatic right subcla-
vian artery aneurysm (all views from the right side with supraclavicular exposure). A, Subclavian artery (SCA)
aneurysm is demonstrated after scalenectomy and resection of the cervical and first ribs. After mobilization of
the distal artery into the supraclavicular exposure, clamps were placed and the aneurysmal segment was
excised in preparation for an interposition bypass using a cryopreserved femoral artery graft. B, Distal anasto-
mosis. C, Proximal anastomosis. D, Completed bypass graft. BP, Brachial plexus; Clav, clavicle.

compression of the subclavian artery on physical exami- artery obstruction that occurs with positional compres-
nation, vascular laboratory tests, or imaging studies.15 sion. Management in such patients is more appropriately
However, even in the presence of a bony abnormality, directed toward neurogenic TOS than toward alleviating
symptoms in patients without subclavian artery pathol- positional subclavian artery compression. Some patients
ogy are more readily attributable to brachial plexus with longstanding and severe neurogenic TOS also
compression rather than to any significant degree of exhibit intermittent digital paresthesia, discoloration,
arterial insufficiency caused by the transient subclavian and cold sensation in the absence of a bony abnormality,
1436 Vemuri et al Journal of Vascular Surgery
May 2017

Table IV. Subclavian artery reconstruction in patients with arterial thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS)
Distal thrombectomy at primary Later graft Patent bypass at
Subclavian artery bypass graft conduit No. operation, No. revision, No. follow-up, No. (%)
Cryopreserved femoral artery 12 4 2a 11 (92)
Cryopreserved femoral vein 10 3 1b 9 (90)
Woven Dacronc 4 2 1b 4 (100)
Total 26 9 4 24 (92)
a
Balloon angioplasty for anastomotic stenosis.
b
Operative revision for graft occlusion.
c
DuPont, Wilmington, Del.

Table V. Functional outcome measures in patients with arterial thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS)
Outcome measurea Vascular (n ¼ 23) Nonvascular (n ¼ 17) P valueb,c Total (N ¼ 40)
QuickDASH score
Preoperative 47.6 6 4.9 27.3 6 4.8 .0056 39.1 6 3.8
Postoperative 23.9 6 3.9 13.9 6 3.3 .0629 19.2 6 2.7
P valued .0006 .0297 <.0001
% Change 53 6 5 32 6 27 44 6 12
CBSQ score
Preoperative 53.8 6 7.6 32.1 6 5.9 .0316 44.3 6 5.3
Postoperative 23.5 6 5.4 12.6 6 3.6 .1059 18.4 6 3.4
P valued .0029 .0105 .0001
% Change 65 6 6 51 6 18 59 6 9
McGill Pain Score
Preoperative 15.3 6 3.1 10.1 6 2.5 .2042 13.1 6 2.1
Postoperative 8.1 6 2.2 5.6 6 1.1 .3163 7.0 6 1.3
P valued .0666 .1122 .0173
% Change 31 6 26 49 6 15 38 6 17
CBSQ, Cervical-Brachial Symptom Questionnaire; QuickDASH, 11-item version of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure.
a
Data represent the mean 6 standard error of the mean.
b
Statistical comparisons were made by two-tailed, unpaired t-tests with the Welch correction.
c
Vascular vs nonvascular.
d
Preoperative vs postoperative.

thromboembolism, or overt subclavian artery pathology. treatment strategies for arterial TOS, which is emphasized
Clinical and imaging evaluations demonstrate that these in our multidisciplinary center approach to all forms of
individuals most typically have sympathetic-mediated TOS that integrates expertise in vascular surgery, physical
vasospasm related to chronic brachial plexus nerve therapy, pain management, interventional radiology, and
compression rather than authentic arterial TOS.23,24 other specialties.
This study also excluded patients with distal axillary ar- Like others, we have found that patients with arterial
tery compression at the level of the humeral head, a con- TOS can be readily separated into two patterns of clin-
dition that we have described previously as almost ical presentation by the presence or absence of vascular
exclusively occurring in high-performance overhead ath- complications.6-17 Patients with a nonvascular presenta-
letes.25 Axillary artery and branch vessel lesions in this tion may be further divided into those with symptoms
condition can produce thromboembolic complications attributable to neurogenic TOS and those who are
similar to those observed in arterial TOS, but this is a completely asymptomatic. Surgery may be indicated
separate disorder with different implications for surgical in these patients for the treatment of neurogenic TOS
treatment. Distinguishing between these various clinical unresponsive to conservative management or for the
presentations remains an important aspect of evaluation prevention of subclavian artery complications in those
in patients with different forms of TOS and in interpret- with poststenotic dilatation. A high index of suspicion
ing the results of clinical management. for subclavian artery pathology should be applied to pa-
The present study demonstrates excellent clinical out- tients with a cervical rib or first rib anomaly, where
comes using standardized evaluation and protocol-driven definitive imaging by contrast-enhanced CT, magnetic
Journal of Vascular Surgery Vemuri et al 1437
Volume 65, Number 5

Fig 5. Preoperative and follow-up functional outcomes measures are shown for 40 patients with arterial
thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS), comparing patients with vascular and nonvascular presentations and the entire
group. A, Disability of the Arm, Hand and Shoulder (DASH) scores. B, Cervical-Brachial Symptom Questionnaire
(CBSQ) scores. C, McGill Pain scores. Data represent the mean 6 standard error of the mean (SEM) for each
group. Comparisons were made by two-tailed, unpaired t-tests with the Welch correction. NS, Not significant.
1438 Vemuri et al Journal of Vascular Surgery
May 2017

resonance imaging, or catheter-based arteriography is conduits, such as cryopreserved femoral artery or vein,
recommended before surgical treatment or conserva- for subclavian revascularization given the ease of use
tive management. and flexibility of these conduits and the recognition
However, routine imaging beyond plain radiographs that bypass grafts in this location are subject to a high
does not appear necessary in all patients with neuro- degree of motion with use of the upper extremity.
genic TOS, where the likelihood of identifying fixed sub- It has also been our practice to obtain routine intrao-
clavian artery pathology is extremely low in the absence perative arteriography to assess the subclavian artery
of a bony abnormality. Furthermore, noninvasive vascular reconstruction. During follow-up we found acceptable
laboratory studies and duplex imaging do not appear to patency rates with subclavian bypass grafts in this series,
offer sufficient accuracy or consistency to be useful in but several patients exhibited bypass graft occlusion.
evaluating patients with neurogenic TOS or those with Each of these individuals had a complicated vascular
suspected arterial TOS. Noteworthy in this study was presentation, and two had previously undergone subcla-
that 53% of patients with a nonvascular presentation vian artery revascularization elsewhere before referral,
and preoperative subclavian artery dilatation had dilata- emphasizing the management challenges presented
tion of <100% at the time of surgical treatment and thus by some patients with arterial TOS.
did not undergo arterial reconstruction compared
with only 13% of patients with a vascular presentation. CONCLUSIONS
Long-term follow-up in those not having arterial re- Arterial TOS is a rare condition with the potential for
construction revealed no further dilatation or vascular life- and limb-threatening thromboembolic complica-
complications, indicating that thoracic outlet decom- tions. This single-institution series demonstrates the
pression alone is sufficient to prevent progression of sub- diverse clinical presentation of arterial TOS coincident
clavian artery pathology in this situation. We recommend with a wide spectrum of bony and arterial pathology.
that such patients undergo periodic follow-up imaging This study also indicates that current surgical protocols
with MRA or CTA to monitor for dilatation in the first can achieve excellent outcomes for this frequently
few years, but this is probably not needed beyond 3 to complicated subset of patients.
5 years of surgical treatment.
Patients with a vascular presentation of arterial TOS
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Conception and design: CV, LM, AA, RT
have the greatest potential for disability and poor out-
Analysis and interpretation: CV, LM, AA, RT
comes, which are usually dictated by the extent of distal
Data collection: CV, LM, AA, RT
thromboembolism and ischemia before surgical treat-
Writing the article: CV, RT
ment.6-18 We have recommended that when feasible,
Critical revision of the article: CV, LM, AA, RT
those with acute or subacute upper extremity ischemia
Final approval of the article: CV, LM, AA, RT
initially undergo surgical treatment for distal thrombo-
Statistical analysis: RT
embolism, followed by anticoagulation. Any additional
Obtained funding: RT
imaging evaluation is then performed, followed by
Overall responsibility: RT
staged surgical treatment for arterial TOS as a secondary
procedure, days to weeks after thromboembolectomy.
This approach was illustrated by eight patients in the REFERENCES
1. Halsted WS. An experimental study of circumscribed dilation
present study, representing 38% of those presenting of an artery immediately distal to a partially occluding band
with thromboembolism, whereas the remainder pre- and its bearing on the dilatation of the subclavian artery
sented with chronic digital ischemia or emboli not observed in certain cases of cervical ribs. J Exp Med 1916;24:
amenable to thromboembolectomy. We also had two 271-86.
patients in this series who presented with posterior cere- 2. Halsted WS. Dilation of the great arteries distal to partially
occluding bands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1918;4:204-10.
bral stroke as a result of retrograde thromboembolism 3. Holman E. The obscure physiology of post-stenotic dilata-
from the subclavian artery, along with upper extremity tion: its relation to the development of aneurysms. J Thorac
symptoms. Posterior stroke is the most devastating Surg 1954;28:109-33.
vascular complication of arterial TOS and must be kept 4. Robicsek F, Sanger PW, Taylor FH, Magistro R, Foti E. Patho-
in mind during diagnostic evaluation and treatment genesis and significance of post-stenotic dilatation in great
vessels. Ann Surg 1955;147:835-44.
planning.26,27 5. Illig KA, Donahue DM, Duncan A, Freischlag JA, Gelabert H,
In addition to supraclavicular thoracic outlet decom- Johansen K, et al. Reporting standards of the Society for
pression, 26 patients underwent subclavian artery recon- Vascular Surgery for thoracic outlet syndrome: executive
struction with an interposition bypass graft. This was summary. J Vasc Surg 2016;64:797-802.
usually conducted from the supraclavicular exposure 6. Blank RH, Connar RG. Arterial complications associated with
thoracic outlet compression syndrome. Ann Thorac Surg
alone, but when necessary, an infraclavicular incision 1974;17:315-24.
was added to obtain distal control of the axillary artery. 7. Short DW. The subclavian artery in 16 patients with complete
Our preference in this series was to use biological cervical ribs. J Cardiovasc Surg 1975;16:135-41.
Journal of Vascular Surgery Vemuri et al 1439
Volume 65, Number 5

8. Haimovici H. Arterial thromboembolism of the upper 19. Raptis CA, Sridhar S, Thompson RW, Fowler KJ, Bhalla S.
extremity associated with the thoracic outlet syndrome. Imaging of the patient with thoracic outlet syndrome. Ra-
J Cardiovasc Surg 1982;23:214-20. diographics 2016;36:984-1000.
9. Scher LA, Veith FJ, Haimovici H, Samson RH, Ascer E, Gupta SK, 20. Duwayri YM, Thompson RW. Supraclavicular approach for
et al. Staging of arterial complications of cervical rib: guidelines surgical treatment of thoracic outlet syndrome. In: Chaikof EL,
for surgical management. Surgery 1984;95:644-9. Cambria RP, editors. Atlas of vascular surgery and endovas-
10. Scher LA, Veith FJ, Samson RH, Gupta SK, Ascer E. Vascular cular therapy. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2014. p. 172-92.
complications of thoracic outlet syndrome. J Vasc Surg 21. Desai SS, Toliyat M, Dua A, Charlton-Ouw KM, Hossain M,
1986;3:565-8. Estrera AL, et al. Outcomes of surgical paraclavicular thoracic
11. Cormier JM, Amrane M, Ward A, Laurian C, Gigou F. Arterial outlet decompression. Ann Vasc Surg 2014;28:457-64.
complications of the thoracic outlet syndrome: fifty-five 22. Caputo FJ, Wittenberg AM, Vemuri C, Driskill MR, Earley JA,
operative cases. J Vasc Surg 1989;9:778-87. Rastogi R, et al. Supraclavicular decompression for neuro-
12. Durham JR, Yao JS, Pearce WH, Nuber JM, McCarthy WJ. genic thoracic outlet syndrome in adolescent and adult
Arterial injuries in the thoracic outlet syndrome. J Vasc Surg populations. J Vasc Surg 2013;57:149-57.
1995;21:57-69; discussion: 70. 23. Molina JE, D’Cunha J. The vascular component in neurogenic-
13. Nehler MR, Taylor LM, Moneta GL, Porter JM. Upper extremity arterial thoracic outlet syndrome. Int J Angiol 2008;17:83-7.
ischemia from subclavian artery aneurysm caused by bony 24. Likes K, Rochlin DH, Call D, Freischlag JA. Coexistence of
abnormalities of the thoracic outlet. Arch Surg 1997;132:527-32. arterial compression in patients with neurogenic thoracic
14. Gelabert HA, Machleder HI. Diagnosis and management of outlet syndrome. JAMA Surg 2014;149:1240-3.
arterial compression at the thoracic outlet. Ann Vasc Surg 25. Duwayri YM, Emery VB, Driskill MR, Earley JA, Wright RW,
1997;11:359-66. Paletta GA Jr, et al. Positional compression of the axillary
15. Criado E, Berguer R, Greenfield L. The spectrum of arterial artery causing upper extremity thrombosis and embolism in
compression at the thoracic outlet. J Vasc Surg 2010;52:406-11. the elite overhead throwing athlete. J Vasc Surg 2011;53:
16. Marine L, Valdes F, Mertens R, Kramer A, Bergoeing M, 1329-40.
Urbina J. Arterial thoracic outlet syndrome: a 32-year expe- 26. Lee TS, Hines GL. Cerebral embolic stroke and arm ischemia
rience. Ann Vasc Surg 2013;27:1007-13. in a teenager with arterial thoracic outlet syndrome: a case
17. Azizzadeh A, Thompson RW. Clinical presentation and pa- report. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2007;41:254-7.
tient evaluation in ATOS. In: Illig KA, Thompson RW, 27. Palmer OP, Weaver FA. Bilateral cervical ribs causing cere-
Freischlag JA, Donahue DM, Jordan SE, Edgelow PI, editors. bellar stroke and arterial thoracic outlet syndrome: a case
Thoracic outlet syndrome. London: Springer; 2013. p. 551-6. report and review of the literature. Ann Vasc Surg 2015;29:
18. Thompson RW. Management of digital emboli, vasospasm, 840.e1-4.
and ischemia in ATOS. In: Illig KA, Thompson RW,
Freischlag JA, Donahue DM, Jordan SE, Edgelow PI, editors.
Thoracic outlet syndrome. London: Springer; 2013. p. 557-63. Submitted Sep 8, 2016; accepted Nov 14, 2016.

You might also like