1.1 INTRODUCTION Finance According to Khan and Jain can be defined as the art and science of managing money. The major areas of finance are financial service and corporate finance. Financial services are concerned with the design and delivery of advice and financial product to individuals, business and governments. It involves a variety of interesting carrier opportunities within the area of banking and related institution, personal financial planning, and investment real estate, insurance and so on. Corporate finance (also known as financial management or managerial finance) is concerned with duties of financial managers (CEOs) in the business firm. Financial mangers actively manage the financial affairs of any business, namely financial and non-financial, private and public, large and small, profit seeking and not for profit. On the other hand, According to Ross, Westerfield and Jordan , corporate finance is the study of the way to answer this three questions Such as ‘What long-term investments should you take on?’ ‘Where will you get the long-term financing to pay for your investment?’ How will the firm manager its daily financial activities 1.2 Approaches to financial management/Scope of Financial Management Finance was a branch of economics till 1890 and emerged as a separate field of study in early 1900s. Since then, the duties and responsibilities of the financial managers have undergone continuous change. The two main reasons for the ongoing change in the functions of finance are: i. The continuous growth and increasing diversity of the national and international economy, and ii. The time to time development of new analytical tools that have been adopted by financial managers Financial management approach measures the scope of the financial management in various fields, which include the essential part of the finance. Financial management is not a revolutionary concept but an evolutionary. The definition and scope of financial management has been changed from one period to another period and applied various innovations. Theoretical points of view, financial management approach may be broadly divided into two major parts. 1. Traditional Approach Traditional approach is the initial stage of financial management, which was followed, in the early part of during the year 1920 to 1950. This approach is based on the past experience and the
Financial management I Page 1
traditionally accepted methods. Main part of the traditional approach is rising of funds for the business concern. Traditional approach consists of the following important area. Arrangement of funds from lending body. Arrangement of funds through various financial instruments Finding out the various sources of funds. In general, under the traditional approach, the scope and role of financial management was considered in a very narrow sense of procurement of funds from external sources. 2. The modern Approach(After 1950) The modern approach views the term financial management in a broader sense and provides a conceptual framework for financial decision making. According to this approach the scope of financial management involves the solutions of the three major problems faced by an organization. These are: Investing Financing and Dividend policy. Besides, unlike the old approach, here, the financial manager’s role includes both acquiring of funds from external sources and allocating of the funds efficiently within the firm thereby making internal decisions. In general, Modern Approach focuses on Effective Utilization of Funds. The functions of financial management This refers to the special activities or purposes of financial management. The functions of financial management are planning for acquiring and utilizing funds by a firm as well as distributing funds to the owners in ways that achieve goal of the firm. In general, the functions of financial management include three major decisions a firm must make. These are: 1. Investment Decision • This decision relates to the careful selection of assets in which funds will be invested by the firm. • The asset that can be acquired by a firm may be long term asset and short term asset. • Long term assets is called capital budgeting relates to selection of an asset or investment proposal which would yield benefit in future. It involves three elements. • Measurement of the worth of the proposal • Evaluation of the investment proposal in terms of risk associated with it and
Financial management I Page 2
• Evaluation of the worth of the investment proposal against certain norms or standard. The standard is broadly known as cost of capital. • The short term or current assets is called working capital relates to the allocation of funds as among cash and equivalents, receivables and inventories. – Proper management of working capital ensures firm’s liquidity and profitability. Generally, the investment decisions of a firm deal with the left side of the basic accounting equation: A = L + OE (Assets = Liabilities + Owners’ Equity). 2. Financing Decision Financing decisions involve the acquisition of funds needed to support long-term investments and is concerned with the financing mix or capital structure. • While taking this decision, financial management weighs the advantages and disadvantages of the different sources of finance. • The business can either finance from its shareholder funds which can be subdivided into equity share capital, preference share capital and the accumulated profits. Borrowings from outsiders include borrowed funds like debentures and loans from financial institutions. The financing decisions of a firm are generally concerned with the right side of the basic accounting equation. 3. Dividend Decision • This decision relates to the appropriation of profits earned. • Firms distribute all profits or retain them or distribute a portion and retain the balance with it. • Which course should be allowed? The decision depends upon the preference of the shareholders and investment opportunities available to the firm. • Dividend decision has a strong influence on the market price of the share. There are tradeoffs on the dividend policy of a firm. On the one hand, paying out more dividends will make the firm to be perceived strong and healthy by investors; on the other hand, it will affect the future growth of the firm. • So the dividend policy is to be determined in terms of its impact on shareholder’s value. • The optimum dividend policy is one which maximizes the value of shares and wealth of the shareholders.
Financial management I Page 3
1.3 Functions of finance manager The financial staff’s task is to acquire and then help operate resources so as to maximize the value of the firm. Here are some specific activities: 1. Forecasting and planning. The financial staff must coordinate the planning process. This means they must interact with people from other departments as they look ahead and lay the plans that will shape the firm’s future. 2. Major investment and financing decisions. A successful firm usually has rapid growth in sales, which requires investments in plant, equipment, and inventory. The financial staff must help determine the optimal sales growth rate, help decide what specific assets to acquire, and then choose the best way to finance those assets. For example, should the firm finance with debt, equity, or some combination of the two, and if debt is used, how much should be long term and how much short term? 3. Coordination and control. The financial staff must interact with other personnel to ensure that the firm is operated as efficiently as possible. All business decisions have financial implications, and all managers — financial and otherwise — need to take this into account. For example, marketing decisions affect sales growth, which in turn influences investment requirements. Thus, marketing decision makers must take account of how their actions affect and are affected by such factors as the availability of funds, inventory policies, and plant capacity utilization. 4. Dealing with the financial markets. The financial staff must deal with the money and capital markets. Each firm affects and is affected by the general financial markets where funds are raised, where the firm’s securities are traded, and where investors either make or lose money. 5. Risk management. All businesses face risks, including natural disasters such as fires and floods, uncertainties in commodity and security markets, volatile interest rates, and fluctuating foreign exchange rates. However, many of these risks can be reduced by purchasing insurance or by hedging in the derivatives markets. The financial staff is responsible for the firm’s overall risk management program, including identifying the risks that should be managed and then managing them in the most efficient manner. In summary, people working in financial management make decisions regarding which assets their firms should acquire, how those assets should be financed, and how the firm should conduct its operations. If these responsibilities are performed optimally, financial managers will help to maximize the values of their firms, and this will also contribute to the welfare of consumers and employees.
Financial management I Page 4
1.4 Goals of Financial Management If we were to consider possible financial goals, we might come up with some ideas like the following: Survive. Minimize costs. Avoid financial distress and bankruptcy. Maximize profits. Beat the competition Maintain steady earnings growth Maximize sales or market share. Effective procurement and efficient use of finance lead to proper utilization of the finance by the business concern. It is the essential part of the financial manager. Hence, the financial manager must determine the basic objectives of the financial management. Financial Management objectives may be broadly divided into two parts such as: 1. Profit maximization 2. Wealth maximization Profit maximization Is a function of maximizing revenue and /or minimizing costs. If a firm is able to maximize its revenues for a given level of costs or minimizing costs for a given level of revenues, it is considered to be efficient. Profit maximization focuses on the total amount of benefits of any courses of action. This decision rule as applied to financial management implies that the functions of managerial finance should be oriented to making of money. Under the profit maximization decision criteria, actions that increase profit of a firm should be undertaken; and actions that decrease profit should be rejected. Similarly, given alternative courses of actions, decisions would be made in favor of the one with the highest expected profits. Profit maximization, though widely professed, should not be used as a good goal of a firm in financial management. This is because it fails to meet many of the characteristics of a good goal. Drawbacks of Profit Maximization 1. Ambiguity. The term profit or income is vague and ambiguous concept. It is very illusive and has no precise quonotation. Different people understand profit in different several ways. There are many different economic and accounting definitions of profit, each open to its own set of interpretations. Even in accounting profit might refer to short-term or long-term profit, total profit or profit on a per share basis (earnings per share), and before or after text profit. Then, the question or the problem would be which profit is to be maximized? Maximizing one may lead to minimizing the other.
Financial management I Page 5
2. Timing of Benefits. The profit maximization criterion ignores the differences in the time pattern of benefits received from investment proposals. This criterion does not consider the distinction between returns (benefits) received in different time periods and treats all benefits as equally valuable irrespective of the time pattern differences in benefits. In other words, the profit maximization ignores the time value of money, i.e., money today is better than money tomorrow. Also it does not consider the sooner, the better principle. To understand this limitation better let us consider the following example. Example Akaki Manufacturing Share Company wants to choose between two projects: project X and project Y. both projects cost the same, are equally risky and are expected to provide the following benefits over three years period. BENEFITS (PROFITS) YEAR PROJECT X PROJECT Y 1 Br. 25,000 Br. –0- 2 50,000 50,000 3 –0- 25,000 TOTAL Br. 75,000 Br. 75,000 The profit maximization criterion ranks both projects as being equal. However, project X provides higher benefits in earlier years and project Y provides larger benefits in later years. The higher benefits of project X in earlier years could be reinvested to earn even higher profits for later years. Profit seeking organizations must consider the timing of cash flows and profits because money received today has a higher value than money received tomorrow. Cash flows in early years are valued more highly than equivalent cash flows in later years. 3. Quality of Benefits (Risk of Benefits). Profit maximization assumes that risk or uncertainty of future benefits is of no concern to stockholders. Risk is defined as the probability that actual benefit will differ from the expected benefit. Financial decision making involves a risk-return trade-off. This means that in exchange for taking greater risk, the firm expects a higher return. The higher the risk, the higher the expected return. Example Nyala Merchandising Private Limited Company must choose between two projects. Both projects cost the same. Project A has a 50% chance that its cash flows would be actual over the next three years. Project B, on the other hand, has a 90% probability that its cash flows for the next three years would be realized.
Financial management I Page 6
BENEFITS YEAR PROJECT A PROJECT B 1 Br. 60,000 Br. 45,000 2 65,000 50,000 3 95,000 85,000 TOTAL Br. 220,000 Br. 180,000 Under profit maximization, project A is more attractive because it adds more to Nyala than project B. However, if we consider the risk of the two projects, the situation would be reversed. Expected benefit of project A = Br. 220,000 x 50% = Br. 110,000 Expected benefit of project B = Br. 180,000 x 90% = Br. 162,000 In fact, risk can be measured in different ways, and different conclusions about the riskness of a course of action can be reached depending on the measure used. In addition to the probability distribution, illustrated above, risk can also be measured on the basis of the variation of cash flows. The more certain the expected cash flow (return), the higher the quality of benefits (i.e., low risk to investor). Conversely, the more uncertain or fluctuating the expected benefits, the lower the quality of benefits (i.e., high risk to investors). Wealth Maximization Wealth maximization is one of the modern approaches, which involves latest innovations and improvements in the field of the business concern. The term wealth means shareholder wealth or the wealth of the persons those who are involved in the business concern. Wealth maximization is also known as value maximization or net present worth maximization. This objective is a universally accepted concept in the field of business. So, the goal of financial management is maximizing the wealth of owners (i.e. shareholders). According to this model, it is made clear that there are two ways in which the wealth of shareholders changes. These are: Through changing dividend payments, and Through the change in the market price of common shares Hence, the change in shareholders' wealth, or change in the value of business firms, may be calculated as follows: i. Multiply the dividend per share paid during the period by the number of shares owned.
Financial management I Page 7
ii. Multiply the change in shares price during the period by the number of shares owned. iii. Add the dividends and the change in the market value of shares, computed in step 1 and 2 above, to obtain the change in the shareholders' wealth during the period. In order to maximize the wealth of shareholders, a business firm must seek to provide the larges attainable combination of dividends per share and stock price appreciation. Nevertheless, the problem is that while a business firm may have some degree of freedom in setting its dividend policy that is in accordance with wealth maximization goal, it cannot influence the share prices, which are basically set by the interaction of buyers and sellers in the securities/stock markets. Stock prices tend to reflect the perception of the stockholders regarding the ability of the business firm to earn profits and the degree of risks that the business firm assumes in earning its profit. The ultimate risk that the business firm usually faces is the probability that it will fail or go bankrupt. In such an event, The owners/shareholders of the business firm would see their investment becoming worthless; and The creditors would likely see that at least some portion of their loans go unpaid. These events have impacts on the market prices of shares, which, in turn, have impacts on the objective/goal of a business firm, that is, wealth maximization of shareholders. In summary, wealth maximization as a decision criterion is considered to be an ideal goal of a firm in financial management. There are several reasons why wealth maximization decision criterion is superior to other criteria. First, it has an exact measurement unlike profit maximization. It depends on cash flows (inflows and outflows). Second, wealth maximization as a decision criterion considers the quality as well as the time pattern of benefits. Third, it emphasizes on the long-term and sustainable maximization of a firm’s common stock price in the financial market. Fourth, wealth maximization gives recognition to the interest of other stakeholders and to the societal welfare on the long-term basis. 1.5 CONFLICT OF GOALS BETWEEN MANAGEMENT AND OWNERS AND AGENCY PROBLEM As you understand, in a corporate form of business organization owners (stockholders) do not run the activities of the firm. Rather, the stockholders elect the board of directors, who in
Financial management I Page 8
turn assign the management on behalf of the owners. So, basically, managers are agents of the owners of the corporation and they undertake all activities of the firm on behalf of these owners. Managers are agents in a corporation to maximize the common stockholders’ well- being. However, there is a conflict of goals between managers and owners of a corporation and mangers may act to maximize their interest instead of maximizing the wealth of owners. Managers are interested to maximize their personal wealth, job security, life style and fringe benefits. The natural conflict of interest between stockholders and managerial interest create agency problems. Agency problems are the likelihood that mangers may place their personal goals a head of corporate goals. Theoretically, agency problems are always there as long as mangers are agents of owners. Corporations (owners) are aware of these agency problems and they incur some costs as a result of agency. These costs are called agency cost and include: 1. Monitoring expenditures – are expenditures incurred by corporations to monitor or control the activities of managers. A very good example of a monitoring expenditure is fees paid by corporations to external auditors. 2. Bonding expenditures – are cost incurred to protect dishonesty of mangers and other employees of a firm. Example: fidelity guarantee insurance premium. 3. Structuring expenditures – expenditures made to make managers fell sense of ownership to the corporation. These include stock options, performance shares, cash bonus etc. 4. Opportunity costs – unlike the previous three, these costs are not explicit expenditures. Opportunity costs are assumed by corporations due to hindrances of decisions by them as a result of their organizational structure and hierarchy. On top of the above costs assumed by corporations, there are also other ways to motivate managers to act in the best interest of owners. These ways include making know managers that they would be fired if they do not act to maximize shareholders wealth and that the corporation could be overtaken by others if its value is very much lower than other firms. 1.6 The relationship between financial management and other field of study Financial management, as integral part of the overall management, is not a totally independent area. It draws heavily on related disciplines and field of study, such Economics, Accounting, Marketing, Production, Quantitative methods and so on.
Financial management I Page 9
A. Financial Management and Economics The field of finance is closely related to economics. Financial managers must understand the economic framework and be alert to the consequences of varying levels of economic activity and changes in economic policy. They must also be able to use economic theories as guidelines for efficient business operation. Examples include supply-and-demand analysis, profit-maximizing strategies, and price theory. The primary economic principle used in managerial finance is marginal analysis, the principle that financial decisions should be made and actions taken only when the added benefits exceed the added costs. Nearly all financial decisions ultimately come down to an assessment of their marginal benefits and marginal costs. B. Financial Management and Accounting The firm’s finance (treasurer) and accounting (controller) activities are closely related and generally overlap. Indeed, managerial finance and accounting are not often easily distinguishable. In small firms the controller often carries out the finance function, and in large firms many accountants are closely involved in various finance activities. However, there are two basic differences between finance and accounting; one is related to the emphasis on cash flows and the other to decision making. Emphasis on Cash Flows The accountant’s primary function is to develop and report data for measuring the performance of the firm, assessing its financial position, and paying taxes. Using certain standardized and generally accepted principles, the accountant prepares financial statements that recognize revenue at the time of sale (whether payment has been received or not) and recognize expenses when they are incurred. This approach is referred to as the accrual basis. The financial manager, on the other hand, places primary emphasis on cash flows, the intake and outgo of cash. He or she maintains the firm’s solvency by planning the cash flows necessary to satisfy its obligations and to acquire assets needed to achieve the firm’s goals. The financial manager uses this cash basis to recognize the revenues and expenses only with respect to actual inflows and outflows of cash. Decision Making The second major difference between finance and accounting has to do with decision making. Accountants devote most of their attention to the collection and presentation of financial data. Financial managers evaluate the accounting statements, develop additional data, and make decisions on the basis of their assessment of the associated returns and risks. Of course, this does
Financial management I Page 10
not mean that accountants never make decisions or that financial managers never gather data. Rather, the primary focuses of accounting and finance are distinctly different C. Financial Management and Mathematics Modern approaches of the financial management applied large number of mathematical and statistical tools and techniques. They are also called as econometrics. Economic order quantity, discount factor, time value of money, present value of money, cost of capital, capital structure theories, dividend theories, ratio analysis and working capital analysis are used as mathematical and statistical tools and techniques in the field of financial management. D. Financial Management and Production Management Production management is the operational part of the business concern, which helps to multiple the money into profit. Profit of the concern depends upon the production performance. Production performance needs finance, because production department requires raw material, machinery, wages, operating expenses etc. These expenditures are decided and estimated by the financial department and the finance manager allocates the appropriate finance to production department. The financial manager must be aware of the operational process and finance required for each process of production activities. E. Financial Management and Marketing Produced goods are sold in the market with innovative and modern approaches. For this, the marketing department needs finance to meet their requirements. The financial manager or finance department is responsible to allocate the adequate finance to the marketing department. Hence, marketing and financial management are interrelated and depends on each other. F. Financial Management and Human Resource Financial management is also related with human resource department, which provides manpower to all the functional areas of the management. Financial manager should carefully evaluate the requirement of manpower to each department and allocate the finance to the human resource department as wages, salary, remuneration, commission, bonus, pension and other monetary benefits to the human resource department. Hence, financial management is directly related with human resource management.
Financial management I Page 11
1.7 Financial Markets and the Corporation Financial markets are markets in which financial instruments are bought and sold by suppliers and demanders of funds. They, unlike financial institutions, are places in which suppliers and demanders of funds meet directly to transact business. Functions of Financial Markets Generally, financial markets play three important roles in functioning of corporate finance. They assist the capital formation process. Financial markets serve as a way through which firms can obtain the capital they need for their operations and investment. Financial markets serve as resale markets for financial instruments. They create continuous liquid markets where firms can obtain the capital they need from individuals and other businesses easily (serve as a secondary market). They play a role in setting the prices of securities. The price of a financial instrument is determined through the interaction of demand and supply of the security in the financial markets. Classification of Financial Markets There are many types of financial markets and hence several ways to classify them. For our purpose, here we shall consider the following two classifications. 1. Classification on the basis of maturity This is based on the maturity dates of securities Money Markets - are financial markets in which securities traded have maturities of one-year or less. Examples of securities traded here include treasury bills, commercial papers, and short – term promissory notes and so on. Capital Markets - are financial markets in which securities of long-term funds are traded. Major securities traded in capital markets include bonds, preferred and common stocks. 2. Classification on the basis of the nature of securities This is based on whether the securities are new issues or have been outstanding in the market place. Primary Markets - are financial marketers in which firms raise capital by issuing new securities. Secondary Markets - are financial markets in which existing and already outstanding securities are traded among investors. Here the issuing corporation does not raise new finance.
Financial management I Page 12
Financial Institutions Financial institutions are financial intermediaries, which are specialized financial firms that facilitate the transfer of funds from savers to demanders of capital. They accept savings form customers and lend this money to other customers or they invest it. In many instances, they pay savers interest on deposited funds. In some cases, they impose service charges on customers for the services they render. For example, many financial institutions impose service charges on current accounts. The key participants in financial transactions of financial institutions are individuals, businesses, and government. By accepting the savings from these parties, financial institutions transfer again to individuals, business firms, and governments. Since financial institutions are generally large, they gain economies of scale in the transfer of money between savers and demanders. By pooling risks, they help individual savers to diversify their risk. The major classes of financial institutions include commercial banks, savings and loan associations, mutual savings banks, credit unions, pension funds and life insurance companies. Among these, commercial banks are by far the most common financial institutions in many countries worldwide. In Ethiopia too, commercial banks are the major institutions that handle the savings and borrowing transactions of individuals, businesses, and governments. Financial Instruments Financial instruments are written and formal documents of transferring funds between and among individuals, businesses, and governments. They include loans and borrowing contracts, promissory notes, commercial papers, treasury bills, bonds, and stocks. Under normal circumstances, two parties are involved in any financial instrument. For holders, who have invested their money, financial instruments are financial assets. A financial asset gives the holder the right to claim against the income and assets of its issuer. For the issuer, on the other hand, financial instruments represent either liabilities or equity items. For instance, if you consider a bond, it represents an investment (financial asset) for the holder, and a debt item for its issuer. Similarly, if you consider a common stock, it represents an investment and equity item for the holder and issuer respectively. The issuer gives the financial asset to the purchaser (holder) in exchange for some valuable consideration, usually in the form of cash or another financial asset.