Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NOTES
NOTES
NOTES
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS
Q.2.Why was the Right to Property removed from the Fundamental Rights?
Ans: The constitution of India does not merely declare a list of rights. A mere
declaration of Fundamental Right is meaningless, unless there is effective
machinery for their enforcement. Right to constitutional remedies is a fundamental
right under Art 32, the very soul of the constitution and very heart of it. It
guarantees the right to move the Supreme Court by appropriate proceedings for the
enforcement of the rights conferred by part 3rd of the constitution. The Supreme
Court has been vested with the special jurisdiction and responsibility in the matter
of the enforcement of fundamental rights. In the exercise of this jurisdiction the
Supreme Court is empowered to issue orders, directions and writs in the nature of
Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Prohibition, Quo-Warranto and Certiorari, whichever
may be appropriate? This power of Supreme Court is not exclusive but is
concurrent with that of the High Courts. Under Art. 226, the High Courts have
been empowered to issue orders, directions and writs for the enforcement of
Fundamental Rights.
For the enforcement of fundamental rights, the Supreme Court can issue the
following directions or orders or writs:
(1) The writ of Habeas Corpus: Writ of Habeas corpus is the most valuable writ
for personal liberty. ‘Habeas Corpus’ means let us have the body. A person when
arrested moves the court for the issue of writ of Habeas Corpus. It is an order by a
court to a detaining authority to produce the arrested person before it so that it may
examine whether the person has been lawfully detained or not. If the Court is
convinced that the person is illegally detained, it can issue order for release.
(2) The writ of Mandamus: Mandamus is a Latin word which means we
command Mandamus is an order from a superior court or tribunal or public
authority to a lower court or tribunal or public authority to perform an act which
falls within its duty. In short it is a writ issued to a public official to do a thing
which is a part of his official duty but which he has so far failed to do. This writ
cannot be claimed as a matter of right. It is the discretionary power of the court to
issue such writs.
(3) The writ of Quo-Warranto: The word Quo-Warranto literally means by what
warrants. It is a writ issued with a view to restraining a person from acting in a
public office to which he is not entitled. The writ of Quo-Warranto is used to
prevent illegal assumption of any public office or usurpation of any public office
by anybody.
(4) The writ of Prohibition: Writ of Prohibition means to forbid or to stop and it
is popularly known as ‘stay orders’. This writ is issued when a lower court or body
tries to transgress the limits of powers vested in it. It is a writ issued by a superior
court to a lower court or a tribunal forbidding it to perform an act outside its
jurisdiction. After the issue of this writ proceeding in the lower court come to stay.
(5) The writ of Certiorari: Literally, Certiorari means to be certified. The writ of
Certiorari is issued by the Superior court to some inferior courts or tribunal to
transfer the matter to it or to some other superior authority for proper
consideration.
Ans: Articles 20 to 22 aim at protecting the individual’s life & personal liberty.
Art. 20 lay down:
(a) No person shall be convicted to any offence except for violation of a law in
force at the time of commission of the act charged as offence:
(b) No person shall be subjected to greater penalty as prescribed under the law in
force at the time of commission of offence:
(c) No person shall be punished for the same offence more than once.
(d) No person accused of any offence shall be compelled to be a witness against
himself:
Article 21 provides that, no person shall be deprived of his life & personal
liberty except according to the procedure established by law. No person can be
arrested in any arbitrary manner nor can he be detained for an indefinite period.
Q.7. Identify any two situations in which the fundamental rights can be
suspended?
Ans: following are the situations in which the fundamental rights can be
suspended:
(1) When the president declares emergency under Art. 352, fundamental rights
given under Art.19 are automatically suspended throughout the country. The
suspensions of fundamental rights continue until the proclamation of emergency
ends.
(2) By another order president can suspend any or all the rights conferred by part
III. During the proclamation of emergency under Article 352, the President can
suspend the right to move the courts to enforce any other Fundamental Rights. All
proceedings pending in any court for the enforcement of the rights may remain
suspended for the period during which proclamation is enforced or for such short
period as may be specified in the order. But the right to move the court for the
enforcement of the right to life and personal liberty under Article 20 and 21 cannot
be suspended.
Ans: The Directive principles of state policy are included in part IV (Arts.36-51)
of the Constitution. The Directive Principles of state policy are general directives
to the Government of India which they should keep in mind while formulating
policies and make law. Directive principles are in the nature of affirmative
instructions to government to direct its activities to do certain things. Directive
principles are non-justiciable.
Objectives:
(1) These Directive principles aim at realization of social & economic freedom
without which political freedom has no meaning at all.
(2) Article 37 declares these Directive principles to be fundamental in the
governance of the country & it shall be the duty of the state to apply these
principles in making laws.