Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ethnozoology Animals in Our Lives R Omulo R Omeu N Obrega A Lves Full Chapter
Ethnozoology Animals in Our Lives R Omulo R Omeu N Obrega A Lves Full Chapter
Edited by
v
vi co TENTS
Introduclion 323
13. Animals and Human Health: Where
Brief History 324
Do They Meet?
Fauna Used in War and Their Functions 325
ROMULO RQ.'o.1EU N6HREGA ALVES A N D tAMARA Final Remarks 335
DA SliVA POLICARPO
References 335
lnrroducrion 233
Biotherapy 240
18. The Ethnozoological Role of
Conclusions 251 Working Animals in Traction and
References 25 I Transport
ROMULO ROMEU N6BREGA ALVES
The Role of Zoos and Aquariums in Animal Why Are Some Anima ls Ugly? 449
Conservation 357 \,(!hy Certain Harmless Animals Are Considered
The Controversial Debate on the Role of Zoos Ugly? 451
and Aquariums 358 \Vhy Certain Anima.b Are Con�idered Cute! 452
Final Remarks 359 The Role of Colors in Attitudes Toward Ani m als 453
Reference� 359 Rarity and Attitudes To\....ard Animals 454
Gender Differences in Preferences for Animals 454
20. From Roman Arenas to Mov i e Screens: Developmental Aspects and Correlates With
Animal A ttirudes 455
Animals in Entertainment and Sport
Companion Animals 456
R6MULO ROMEU N6BREGA ALVES AND
RAYNNER RILKE DUARTE BARBOZA. In.fluences of Keeping Anitn(l is (IS Pets on Attitudes
Toward Animals 456
introduction 363 Influences or Mear Consumption on At tirudes Toward
Using Animals as Entertainment 365 Animals 457
Conclusion 379 Human Emo tion s and Animal Conservar.ion 457
References 380 A[titude Change: The Role of Education 458
Conclusion 459
2t. Animals as Ethnozooinclicatocs of Acknowledgmcnts 459
Reference� 459
Weather and Climat e
Funher Reading 466
ROMULO ROMEU NOBREGA ALVES AND RAYNNER RILKE
DUARTE I)ARBOZA
24. The Role of Ethnozoology in
Introduction 383 Animal Studies
Invertebrates 387 ROMULO ROMEU NOBREGA ALVES AND SERGIO DE FARIA
Vertebrates 4lO LOPES
Final Remar ks 416
References 416 Introduction 467
Use of Traditional Knowledge in Ecologicalfloological
Studies 468
22. Understanding Human-Wildlife
How Can Local Ecological Knowledge Help in Faunistic
Conflicts and Their Implications
Surveys and Taxonomic Studies? 469
DEN1SE FRElTAS TORRES, EDUAROO SlLVA OLiVE1RA AND
Discovering New Species Through Ethnozoological
ROMULO ROMEU N6BREGA ALVES
Studies 472
LEK as Source of Scientific Insights 472
Introduction 421
Relevance of local Ecological Knowledge in
The Prlncipai Taxa Involvcd in Conflicts 422
Factors That Lead to Conflict 424 Studies on the Conservation and Management
of Fauna 474
Implications for Conservacion of Species 435
Final Remarks 475
Prop osals for Confhct Mitigation 436
References 475
Final Considerations 440
References 440
25. Ethnozoology and Animal Conservation
23. Biological Preclispositions and Individual R6MULO ROMEU N6BREGA ALVES, JOSIVAN SOARES SILVA,
LEONARDO DA SILVA CHAVES AND ULYSSES PAULINO
Differences in Human Attitudes Toward ALBUQUERQUE
Animals
PAVOL PROKOP AND CHRISTOPH RANDLER Introduction 481
The Role of Ethnobiology Ln Biodiverslty
How Does Evolution Shape Human Artitudes to Conserv<lt'ion 482
Animals? 447 Human Influence on Animal Biodiversity 483
Coevolution With Snakes Enhances Visual Attention to The Role of Ethnozoo logy in Animal Consclvation 486
Dangerous Sti muli 448 Final Considerations 491
Aesthetic Preferences for Animals 449 References 492
CONTENTS ix
26. The Use of Traditional Ecological 27. Ethnozoology: An Overview and Current
Knowledge in the Context of Participatory Perspectives
Wi ldlife Management: Examples R6MULO ROMEU N6BREGA ALVES, jOS[VAN SOARES SILVA,
LEONAF.DO DA SlLVA CHAvES ANO ULYSSES }'AULINO
From Indigenous Communities in Puerto
ALBUQUERQUE
Narino, Amazonas-Colombia
NATHALIE VAN VLIET, LAURANE L'HARIOON, JUANITA Introduction 513
GOMEZ, LILIANA VANEGAS, FRANc;GIS SANDRIN AND Col leering Data Concerning Ethnozoological
ROBERT NASI Publications 514
Global Scientific Production in Erhnozoo[ogy 515
lntroduction 497
Final Considerations 519
Study Site 498
References 520
TabcxJs and Beliefs Affecting the Use of Wildlife 501
Monitoring \Vildlife Populations Using a Traditional
Practice to Imitate the Animals 504 Index 523
Discussion and Conclusions 509
Acknowledgments 510
References 510
List of Contributors
xi
xii List of Contributors
Kleber da Silva Vieira Universidade Estadual da Steve Wolverton University of North Texas,
Paraíba, Campina Grande, Brazil; Universidade Denton, TX, United States
Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa, Brazil
Washington Luiz Silva Vieira Universidade Fed
eral da Paraíba, João Pessoa, Brazil
C H A P T E R
1
Introduction: Animals in Our Lives
Rômulo Romeu Nóbrega Alves1, Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque2
1Universidade Estadual da Paraíba, Campina Grande, Brazil; 2Universidade Federal de Pernambuco,
Recife, Brazil
Ethnozoology
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809913-1.00001-6 1 © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
2 1. ANIMALS IN OUR LIVES
activities involving animals, from the oldest to the human–animal relationships and passed down
most contemporary, has resulted in a diversifica- from generation-to-generation through oral tra-
tion of human–animal interactions. Certainly what ditions (Allaby, 2010; Alves et al., 2017, 2012b).
we are today has been profoundly influenced Culture guides our attitudes toward animals
by the relationships established with animals (Alves et al., 2014; Shanks, 2002), which are
throughout our shared history with them. also shaped by many other factors, including
From a utilitarian perspective, today, as in our experiences with them (perhaps as farmers,
the past, humans have long exploited animal hunters, fishermen, pet owners, or experiment-
products to provide food and materials for mak- ers), exposure to biological science, religious
ing tools, feed, ornaments, medicines, fertilizer, beliefs, philosophical presuppositions, and
and income, as well as providing agricultural, psychological factors, such as our capacity for
transport, entertainment, companionship, and empathy (Shanks, 2002).
religious services (Alves, 2012; Alves et al., Human interest in animals represents a
2016; Alves and Rosa, 2013; Bowman, 1977; characteristic of all societies, from those resid-
Figueirêdo et al., 2015; Fitter, 1986). Reinforcing ing in the most isolated locations to those in
the utilitarian value of fauna, Plous (1993) the most urbanized areas of the world. Due to
points out that animal products are also found thousands of years of cohabitation, a strong
in the streets of our modern day cities (e.g., in interdependence exists between humans and
asphalt binders), in the cars we drive (e.g., in other animal species (Alves and Souto, 2015;
brake fluid, upholstery, and car wax), in the De Waal, 2009), which generates harmonic and
walls of our homes (e.g., sheetrock and wallpa- conflictual relationships that can be predatory,
per adhesive), on kitchen and bathroom floors competitive, parasitic, mutualistic, and com-
(e.g., in ceramic tiles, linoleum, and floor wax), mensal (Baenninger, 1995). In modern societ-
in toiletries (e.g., perfume, deodorants, soap, ies, our relationship with animals increasingly
and cosmetics), and in a variety of paints, plas- consolidates human control over fauna, with a
tics, textiles, and machinery oils. Domestic ani- view to optimizing the use of faunal resources.
mals provided energy used in a wide range of Thus, there is an intensification of human inter-
services for people (Alves, 2016). Wild-caught ference in the lives of all animals with which
species have also been tamed for various pur- humans interact. An example of this is that
poses other than predation, such as alarms humans have been responsible for the extinc-
for protection, fighting, and as guards, pets, tion of several species, while on the other hand
and pack and draught animals (Alves et al., they have promoted the geographical spread
2013; Fernandes-Ferreira et al., 2012; Gilmore, of several others. In some of these cases, intro-
1950; Roldán-Clarà et al., 2014; Serpell, 1996; duced species become pests, creating problems
Svanberg and Ståhlberg, 2012). It is clear that that affect entire ecosystems. It is clear, there-
human dependence or codependence on fau- fore, that humans are agents that cause impacts
nal resources has intensified over time (Alves, that affect not only the species with which
2012; Alves and Souto, 2015). they interact directly, but others that are indi-
In addition to their utilitarian value, ani- rectly associated. The pronounced influence
mals have had a pronounced participation in of humans and their impacts on the environ-
the cultural practices and religious beliefs of ment characterizes the geological epoch we
humankind (Adeola, 1992; Alves et al., 2012a; live in, the Anthropocene, which has increas-
Kemmerer, 2011; Olupona, 1993). Many myths, ingly placed the animal world under growing
proverbs, and stories have been generated from pressure.
Investigating Animals and Their Interactions With Humans 3
This scenario makes the need to understand animals themselves, zoology and natural sci-
the complexities of the relationships between ence enthusiasts were also interested in the
humans and other animals increasingly evident, potential uses of animals for humans, in partic-
not only from biological and ecological perspec- ular the species that were targeted or hunted,
tives, but also from historical, social, cultural, as well as the knowledge that native peoples
economic, psychological, and sociological con- had of the fauna in general. An example of
texts. Of course, because of the complexity of this is evident in the narratives of ancient
human–animal interactions, this understanding naturalists who always included information
involves different academic disciplines, espe- of ethnozoological interest in their writings,
cially within the social and biological sciences. among them Linnaeus, Darwin, and Lamarck
Ethnozoology, the theme of this book, arises as (Moreira, 2002; Ståhlberg and Svanberg, 2014).
a discipline that can provide important contri- This perspective would be the preface for the
butions and serve as a bridge enabling dialogue emergence of academic disciplines that seek to
between the different academic fields interested investigate the different aspects of the interac-
in this subject. tions between animals and humans.
Such interactions are dynamic and multi-
faceted, which makes it impossible to investi-
INVESTIGATING ANIMALS AND gate them through a single area of knowledge.
THEIR INTERACTIONS WITH Consequently, several academic disciplines
HUMANS related to the areas of social and biological
sciences have sought to investigate the sub-
As discussed above, fauna have been of ject, among which are anthropology, sociology,
great significance to humans throughout his- psychology, history, archeology, ethnography,
tory. Consequently, they represent one of the economics, geography, literature, philosophy,
themes with which most people have the great- zoology, ecology, and conservation biology. As
est familiarity, interest, or contact (Springer a result, several books have been published,
and Holley, 2012). Humans of all societies have especially in the last decades, which have
always attempted to understand animals by focused on human–animal interactions in gen-
generating a fundamental basis of zoological eral (Baky, 1980; Bowman, 1977; Gross and
knowledge by interacting/exploring faunas, Vallely, 2013), as well as more specific treat-
which have played a crucial role in the evolu- ments such as the utilitarian aspect of fauna,
tion of the human species since its emergence. including for medicinal purposes (Alves and
The earliest humans must have had, and passed Rosa, 2013), as pets (Pręgowski, 2016; Wilson
on, knowledge about animals to increase their and Turner, 1997), and in service in war (Cooper,
chances of survival, which likely included 2000; Kistler, 2011; van Vliet, 2007). Some of
unsystematic knowledge of animal ecology and these publications addressed the social and cul-
anatomy. With domestication of fauna, and the tural importance of animals (Allaby, 2010; De
consequent possibility of better observing them, Mello, 2016; Kalof, 2007; Kalof and Resl, 2007;
people learned more. Malamud et al., 2007); while others focused on
From our ancient and constant interest in interactions with some specific groups of wild
fauna emerged the field of zoology, one of (Dore et al., 2017; Kothari, 2007; Marcum, 2007;
the first areas of research of the natural world Morris and Morris, 1965; Tidemann and Gosler,
made by humankind (Springer and Holley, 2010; Waller, 2016) or domestic (Clutton-Brock,
2012). In addition to information about the 2007, 2012) animals, to cite a few examples.
4 1. ANIMALS IN OUR LIVES
These, and many other themes, have also been depend on active human involvement (Probst
the focus of a growing number of articles pub- and Crow, 1991). Thus, as humans are the source
lished in numerous scientific journals, including of problems, as well as the hope for solutions
those in the area of ethnobiology (Ethnobiology (Saunders, 2003), it is essential to incorporate
and Conservation, Journal of Ethnobiology, human dimensions into practices aiming at the
Ethnobiology Letters and Journal of Ethnobiology conservation of fauna, and in this regard, ethno-
and Ethnomedicine), those particularly devoted zoology has a great contribution to offer.
to the examination of different aspects of the
relationship between human beings and other
animals (e.g., Anthrozoos; Between the Species; WHY THIS BOOK?
Humanimalia; Journal of Applied Animal Welfare
Science, Politics and Animals; Society & Animals), Our history is full of indications of the cru-
and several others in areas such as medicine cial role that animals have played in human life,
and biodiversity conservation (e.g., BioScience, resulting in connections that have been debated
Journal of Ethnopharmacology, Biodiversity and for centuries by various areas of research, and
Conservation, Conservation Biology, Ecology and which have contributed to understanding
Society, Fish and Fisheries, etc.). This entire arse- animal–human relationships from different
nal of publications reinforces the fact that ani- perspectives. In this scenario, ethnozoology
mals represent one of the subjects that most arises as a dynamic and cross-disciplinary area
attract the attention of human beings. It is not of research that can provide important contri-
possible to understand our biological and cul- butions and serve as a bridge between the dif-
tural evolution without examining how animals ferent academic fields that seek to investigate
have, and continue to, affect human societies, human-animal interactions. In this perspec-
and vice versa, highlighting the importance of tive, ethnozoology has attracted researchers
research investigating the connection between from diverse fields of study, which has resulted
animals and human beings (Alves, 2017; Alves in a visible increase in the number of publica-
and Souto, 2015). Ethnozoology, the theme tions on the subject in the last decades.
of this book, joins the different research areas Despite major advances in ethnozoology,
seeking to contribute to the understanding there is still a worldwide lack of textbooks
of the complexity and implications of fauna- that can serve as references for its teaching.
human interactions. As pointed out by Alves Currently, some books have appeared that
(2017), “Ethnozoology is a hybrid discipline have filled gaps in ethnobiology for teach-
that has been structured with elements from ing and research (Ethnobiology, Ethnobotany,
both the natural and social sciences, as it seeks Ethnopharmacology, etc.) (Albuquerque and
to understand how humans have perceived and Alves, 2016; Albuquerque et al., 2014; Anderson
interacted with faunal resources throughout his- et al., 2012; Cunningham, 2001; Heinrich and
tory.” Together with ethnobotany, ethnozool- Jäger, 2015), but there is no single book pub-
ogy forms part of the larger body of science of lished in English specifically on ethnozoology.
ethnobiology, which has been increasingly rec- Recognizing this need, Ethnozoology: Animals in
ognized in recent years, especially considering Our Lives represents the first book about this dis-
that the world is facing a potentially massive cipline and provides discussions regarding the
loss of wildlife due to anthropogenic activities key themes of human–animal interactions and
(Alves and Albuquerque, 2012). It is ironic that their implications.
as people impact the ecosystems on which they Following this Introduction, Chapter 2 pro-
depend, conserving diversity will increasingly vides an overview of ethnozoology as a field
Why This Book? 5
of study, focusing on its importance, conceptu- Chapter 20 discusses the role of animals in
alization, and history, highlighting the role eth- entertainment and sport. Chapter 21 brings an
nozoology plays as a discipline focusing on the interesting, but still little explored, ethnozoologi-
relationships between animals and humans. cal theme, the use of fauna as predictors of cli-
These interactions are known to be very old matic and weather events, addressing the role
according to research in zooarcheology and his- of animals as forecasters. Chapter 22 discusses
torical ethnozoology, themes of Chapters 3 and 4, the complex interactions of conflict between
respectively. Chapter 5 discusses the fabulous humans and animals and Chapter 23 focuses
fauna documented in the reports of ancient trav- on the biological influences of human attitudes,
elers and chroniclers and in medieval bestiaries, as well as on the role of education in forming
describing what the authors call “imaginary zool- children’s attitudes and perceptions of living
ogy.” Chapter 6 deals with a theme of historical creatures. Chapter 24 discusses the importance
importance in the field of ethnobiology, ethnotax- of local ecological knowledge as a source of sci-
onomy. The following chapters deal with three entific insights and complementary academic
of the major human activities involving animals, research. Chapter 25 discusses the implications
hunting (Chapter 7), fishing (Chapter 8), and ani- of human actions on fauna and the role of eth-
mal domestication (Chapter 9). Subsequent chap- nozoology from a perspective of conservation of
ters address the use of animals as food, one of animal diversity. In this same vein, Chapter 26
the most fundamental uses of fauna by humans. describes two examples of how traditional eco-
Chapter 10 discusses the importance and diver- logical knowledge may be incorporated in more
sity of uses of wild animals and the sources of formal management plans for wildlife. Finally,
food; and Chapter 11 brings an overview of the Chapter 27 presents a global view of scientific
practices of harvesting and eating insects in dif- production in ethnozoology and its advances,
ferent parts of the world. Reinforcing the impor- trends, and future perspectives.
tance of fauna for alimentary purposes, Chapter We believe that this book, Ethnozoology:
12 presents an analysis of the trade in wildmeat Animals in Our Lives, significantly expands the
sales in the Amazon Tri-frontier region between knowledge base of ethnozoology by covering
Peru, Brazil, and Colombia. In Chapter 13, a a wide range of interactions between humans
discussion is presented on the intimate relation- and animals. Furthermore, we believe it dem-
ships between human and animal health, giving onstrates the importance of inter and cross-
examples of the importance of multidisciplinary disciplinary approaches for increasing our
studies in understanding these connections. An understanding of the coexistence of humans
overview of published scientific literature on the and other animals. This book will be of value
use and commercialization of animals for decora- to researchers, students, educators, conserva-
tive purposes is the subject of Chapter 14, while tionists, wildlife managers, and policymakers,
Chapter 15 discusses the significance of animals as well as the general public, with interests in a
in the principal human cultural manifestations wide range of areas of science, including zool-
of art, literature, symbolism, music, mythology, ogy, biology, ethnobiology, conservation biology,
and religion. Chapter 16 addresses one of the ecology, anthropology, and sociology, among
closest human-animal relationships that of ani- other related academic disciplines. We also hope
mals as pets. The following chapters are devoted that this book will stimulate further research in
to the use of animals in military activities this fascinating field, thus contributing to the
(Chapter 17) and to perform transport and trac- collective understanding of the multidimen-
tion services (Chapter 18). Animals kept in zoos sional context of interactions between humans
and aquariums are the subject of Chapter 19. and animals, an increasingly pressing need since
6 1. ANIMALS IN OUR LIVES
today, perhaps more than at any other time in Alves, R.R.N., Lima, J.R.F., Araújo, H.F., 2013. The live bird
human history, we are faced with the challenge trade in Brazil and its conservation implications: an over-
view. Bird Conservation International 23, 53–65.
of finding forms of exploitation that minimize Alves, R.R.N., Rosa, I.L., 2013. Animals in Traditional Folk
the impact on animal species; an increasingly Medicine: Implications for Conservation. Springer-
clear necessity in the context of animal conser- Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
vation, as well as human survival. Alves, R.R.N., Rosa, I.L., Léo Neto, N.A., Voeks, R., 2012a.
Animals for the gods: magical and religious faunal use
and trade in Brazil. Human Ecology 40, 751–780.
Acknowledgments Alves, R.R.N., Vieira, K.S., Santana, G.G., Vieira, W.L.S.,
Almeida, W.O., Souto, W.M.S., Montenegro, P.F.G.P.,
We are grateful to Kristi A.S. Gomez (Senior Acquisitions
Pezzuti, J.C.B., 2012b. A review on human attitudes
Editor at Elsevier/Academic Press) and Patricia Gonzalez
towards reptiles in Brazil. Environmental Monitoring
(Editorial Project Manager/Animal & Plant Sciences/
and Assessment 184, 6877–6901.
Elsevier) for entrusting us with the edit of this book and for
Alves, R.R.N., Silva, V.N., Trovão, D.M.B.M., Oliveira, J.V.,
her constant support.
Mourão, J.S., Dias, T.L.P., Alves, A.G.C., Lucena, R.F.P.,
Special thanks are due to contributors to the book, for
Barboza, R.R.D., Montenegro, P.F.G.P., 2014. Students’
their enthusiasm, support, and quality work.
attitudes toward and knowledge about snakes in the
Thanks are also due to CNPq (Conselho Nacional de
semiarid region of Northeastern Brazil. Journal of
Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico), for providing us
Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 10, 1–8.
with research productivity scholarships, which helped for
Alves, R.R.N., Souto, W.M.S., 2015. Ethnozoology: a
the development of our studies on the Ethnobiology.
brief introduction. Ethnobiology and Conservation 4,
1–13.
References Alves, R.R.N., Souto, W.M.S., Barboza, R.R.D., 2017. Primates
in mythology. In: Fuentes, A. (Ed.), The International
Adeola, M.O., 1992. Importance of wild animals and their Encyclopedia of Primatology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,
parts in the culture, religious festivals, and traditional pp. 1–6.
medicine, of Nigeria. Environmental Conservation 19, Anderson, E.N., Pearsall, D., Hunn, E., Turner, N., 2012.
125–134. Ethnobiology. Wiley-Blackwell.
Albuquerque, U.P., Alves, R.R.N., 2016. Introduction to Baenninger, R., 1995. Some consequences of animal domesti-
ethnobiology. Springer International Publishing, New cation for humans. Anthrozoos 8, 69–77.
York/London. Baky, J.S., 1980. Humans and Animals. HW Wilson Co.
Albuquerque, U.P., Cunha, L.V.F.C., Lucena, R.F.P., Alves, Bowman, J.C., 1977. Animals for Man. Edward Arnold,
R.R.N., 2014. Methods and Techniques in Ethnobiology London.
and Ethnoecology. Springer, New York. Clutton-Brock, J., 2007. How Domestic Animals Have
Allaby, M., 2010. Animals: from Mythology to Zoology. Facts Shaped the Development of Human Societies.
On File, Inc., New York. Clutton-Brock, J., 2012. Animals as Domesticates: a World
Alves, R.R.N., 2012. Relationships between fauna and peo- View Through History. MSU Press.
ple and the role of ethnozoology in animal conservation. Cooper, J., 2000. Animals in War. Corgi Books, London.
Ethnobiology and Conservation 1, 1–69. Cunningham, A.B., 2001. Applied Ethnobotany: People,
Alves, R.R.N., 2016. Domestication of animals. In: Wild Plant Use and Conservation. Earthscan/James &
Introduction to Ethnobiology. Springer, Albuquerque, James.
UP, Switzerland, pp. 221–225. De Mello, M., 2016. Mourning Animals: Rituals and Practices
Alves, R.R.N., 2017. Ethnozoology. In: Fuentes, A. (Ed.), The Surrounding Animal Death. MSU Press.
International Encyclopedia of Primatology. Wiley. De Waal, F., 2009. The Age of Empathy. Harmony, New York.
Alves, R.R.N., Albuquerque, U.P., 2012. Ethnobiology and Dore, K.M., Riley, E.P., Fuentes, A., 2017. Ethnoprimatology:
conservation: why do we need a new journal? Ethnobiology A Practical Guide to Research at the Human-nonhuman
and Conservation 1, 1–3. Primate Interface. Cambridge University Press.
Alves, R.R.N., Feijó, A., Barboza, R.R.D., Souto, W.M.S., Fernandes-Ferreira, H., Mendonça, S.V., Albano, C., Ferreira,
Fernandes-Ferreira, H., Cordeiro-Estrela, P., Langguth, F.S., Alves, R.R.N., 2012. Hunting, use and conserva-
A., 2016. Game mammals of the Caatinga biome. tion of birds in Northeast Brazil. Biodiversity and
Ethnobiology and Conservation 5, 1–51. Conservation 221–244.
References 7
Figueirêdo, R.E.C.R., Vasconcellos, A., Policarpo, I.S., Alves, Pręgowski, M.P., 2016. Companion Animals in Everyday
R.R.N., 2015. Edible and medicinal termites: a global Life: Situating Human-animal Engagement Within
overview. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine Cultures. Springer.
11, 1–7. Probst, J.R., Crow, T.R., 1991. Integrating biological diversity
Fitter, R.S.R., 1986. Wildlife for Man: How and Why we and resource management. Journal of Forestry 89, 12–17.
Should Conserve our Species. Collins, London. Roldán-Clarà, B., Lopez-Medellín, X., Espejel, I., Arellano,
Gilmore, R., 1950. Fauna and ethnozoology of South E., 2014. Literature review of the use of birds as pets in
America. In: Steward, J. (Ed.), Handbook of South Latin-America, with a detailed perspective on Mexico.
American Indians, pp. 345–463 Washington, DC. Ethnobiology and Conservation 3, 1–18.
Gross, A., Vallely, A., 2013. Animals and the Human Saunders, C.D., 2003. The emerging field of conservation
Imagination: a Companion to Animal Studies. Columbia psychology. Human Ecology LReview 10, 137–149.
University Press, New York. Serpell, J., 1996. In the Company of Animals: a Study of
Heinrich, M., Jäger, A.K., 2015. Ethnopharmacology. John Human-animal Relationships. Cambridge University
Wiley & Sons. Press, Cambridge.
Hurn, S., 2012. Humans and Other Animals: Cross-cultural Shanks, N., 2002. Animals and Science: a Guide to the
Perspectives on Human-animal Interactions. PlutoPress, Debates. ABC-CLIO.
London. Springer, J.T., Holley, D., 2012. An Introduction to Zoology:
Kalof, L., 2007. Looking at Animals in Human History. Investigating the Animal World. Jones & Bartlett
Reaktion Books. Learnign.
Kalof, L., Resl, B., 2007. A Cultural History of Animals: in Ståhlberg, S., Svanberg, I., 2014. Among fishermen and horse
Antiquity. Berg. Nomads. In: Svanberg, I., Łuczaj, Ł. (Eds.), Pioneers in
Kemmerer, L., 2011. Animals and World Religions. Oxford European Ethnobiology. Uppsala University Library,
University Press. Uppsala, Sweden, pp. 73–98.
Kistler, J.M., 2011. Animals in the Military: from Hannibal’s Svanberg, I., Ståhlberg, S., 2012. Wild animals in Russian,
Elephants to the Dolphins of the US Navy. ABC-CLIO. Siberian and Central Asian households according to
Kothari, A., 2007. Birds in our Lives. Universities Press. eighteenth-century travel reports. Journal de la Société
Malamud, R., Kalof, L., Pohl-Resl, B., 2007. A Cultural Finno-Ougrienne 93, 455–486.
History of Animals in the Modern Age. Berg. Tedesco, L.A., 2000. Lascaux (ca. 15,000 B.C.). In: Heilbrunn
Marcum, 2007. Living with Animals: Snakes and Humans, Timeline of Art History. The Metropolitan Museum of
Encyclopedia of Human-animal Relationships: a Art, New York.
Global Exploration of our Connections with Animals. Tidemann, S., Gosler, A., 2010. Ethno-ornithology: birds,
Greenwood Press, Westport, pp. 1181–1184. indigenous people. In: Culture and Society. first ed.
Moreira, I.C., 2002. O escravo do naturalista – O papel do Earthscan/James & James.
conhecimento nativo nas viagens científicas do século 19. van Vliet, D., 2007. Animals and war. In: Heathcote-James,
Ciência Hoje 31, 40–48. E. (Ed.), Psychic Pets – How Animal Intuition and
Morris, R., Morris, D., 1965. Men and Snakes. McGraw-Hill. Perception Has Changed Human Lives. John Blake,
Olupona, J.K., 1993. Some notes on animal symbolism London, England.
in African religion and culture. Anthropology and Waller, M.T., 2016. Ethnoprimatology: Primate Conservation
Humanism 18, 3–12. in the 21st Century. Springer, Switzerland.
Plous, S., 1993. The role of animals in human society. Journal Wilson, C.C., Turner, D.C., 1997. Companion Animals in
of Social Issues 49, 1–9. Human Health. Sage Publications.
C H A P T E R
2
Ethnozoology: Conceptual and Historical
Aspects*
Rômulo Romeu Nóbrega Alves1, Wedson Medeiros Silva Souto2,
Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque3
1Universidade Estadual da Paraíba, Campina Grande, Brazil; 2Universidade Federal do Piauí (UFPI),
Teresina, Brazil; 3Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil
* This chapter represents a revised and updated version of the article “Alves RRN, Souto WMS (2015) Ethnozoology:
A Brief Introduction. Ethnobiology and Conservation 4:1–13.”
Ethnozoology
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809913-1.00002-8 9 © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
10 2. CONCEPTS IN ETHNOZOOLOGY
times (Alves, 2012). All human cultures have 1995). The variety of interactions (both past and
mythologies, and all of them show close integra- present) that human cultures maintain with ani-
tion and connections with animals, and totemic, mals is the subject matter of ethnozoology, a dis-
ancestral, or mythological (imaginary) animals cipline that has its roots as deep within the past
or animal-gods have been present throughout as the first relationship between humans and
human history (Allaby, 2010; Alves et al., 2012a). other animals. Sax (2002) noted that human atti-
Interactions between humans and ani- tudes about animals evolved long before their
mals have given rise to activities such as fish- first attempts to represent them in the arts and
ing and hunting, which are among the most history, and only much later did people begin
ancient human practices, and they continue to to study them scientifically. As such, the origin
play important roles in the survival and evolu- of traditional zoological knowledge, one of the
tion of humanity (Alves, 2012). The domestica- focal points of the study of ethnozoology, can
tion of animals is another excellent example of be thought of as coinciding with the origin of
the relevance of the animals in human history. humans and with the first contacts between our
This process allowed early human societies to species and other animals.
enrich their diets with regular sources of meat The existence of interrelationship between
and milk. Later, certain domesticated animals humans and animals has a wide variety of impli-
provided new sources of muscular energy as cations, depending on the perspective adopted.
pack and mounted animals or for the traction of On one hand, there are many human societies
plows and wagons—thus, multiplying the pro- that promote a deep respect for animals, as these
ductive capacity of men, as well as their spatial creatures are important actors in their spiri-
mobility (Ribeiro, 1998). tual traditions due to their utilitarian or spiri-
From a historical perspective, the domestica- tual value. Societies in Asia, Africa, and Latin
tion of biological resources resulted in extremely America frequently established sacred localities
important modifications of human lifestyles, with inherent spiritual or religious significance,
allowing populations to abandon nomadic and they were frequently also natural sanctu-
practices (carried out since the very beginning aries of biodiversity. Many traditional cultures
of human evolution), become sedentary, and still consider certain animal species sacred and
occupy certain territories where plants could be foster their conservation (even though that is
cultivated and animals domesticated. This situ- not their primary motivation) (McNeely, 2001).
ation progressively decreased the previous com- On the other hand, animals and animal organs
plete human dependence on gathering activities, are universally utilized in many different ways
hunting, and fishing (Alves, 2016), although by human groups, and anthropogenic activities
these activities have perpetuated and still con- can exert great direct or indirect influence on
tribute significantly to human food supplies. the local fauna (especially target species), and
The connection between animals and humans these interactions must be taken into account
dates back to thousands of years, and cultures when conservation actions are being considered
all over the world have developed characteris- (Alves et al., 2008, 2010b, 2010f).
tic ways of interacting with their regional fauna The conservation of natural resources and
over time. Animals have played a wide range biodiversity is indispensable, not only to pre-
of roles in human life from the earliest days of serve genetic diversity but also to guarantee
recorded history, resulting in many kinds of the subsistence of large numbers of humans
interactions with other animals, including inter- throughout the world (Alves and Souto, 2010),
actions that are predatory, competitive, para- and it will not be possible to create meaning-
sitic, mutualistic, and commensal (Baenninger, ful animal conservation strategies without
Historical Considerations About Human and Fauna Interactions 11
considering the interaction of humans with hunts of wild bulls were well documented dur-
animals—the focus of ethnozoological stud- ing the reign of Amenophis III during the later
ies (Alves, 2012). As such, the present chapter part of the Eighteenth Dynasty (ca. 3300 BC)
discusses numerous conceptual and historical when these animals apparently became locally
aspects of ethnozoology–a discipline that seeks extinct (Dodd, 1993). These Old World civiliza-
to investigate the complex but important inter- tions had (often exaggerated) beliefs that certain
relationship between humans and the animals species of animals shared important characteris-
with which we share this earth. tics with humans, and cattle, horses, and snakes,
for example, became symbols that were closely
associated with power/domination or libido/
HISTORICAL CONSIDERATIONS fertility (Dodd, 1993).
ABOUT HUMAN AND FAUNA The antiquity in the use of medicinal animals
INTERACTIONS is another important evidence recorded in his-
torical texts (Alves et al., 2013b). Some of these
Rock paintings and archeological inscrip- texts have been preserved (Svanberg et al., 2011),
tions provide clear evidence of the antiquity such as Assyrian, Egyptian, and Greek histori-
of interactions between humans and other cal documents, which bear witness to extensive
animals (Baker, 1941; Martínez, 2008; Russell, knowledge about how animal and plant prod-
2012), representing important records of how ucts could be utilized (MacKinney, 1946; Raven,
the first humans related to their regional faunas. 2000). Our understanding of Egyptian medi-
Ancient cave paintings often contain animal cine and pharmacology, for example, is based
and/or human figures and show interactions on inscriptions on monuments and graves and
between them—indicating the utilitarian and papyrus rolls, the most important one being the
symbolic importance of animals dating back to Papyrus Ebers. It is thought to have been writ-
prehistorical times (Alves et al., 2010g; Martínez, ten around 1550 BC (Lidgard, 2005) and includes
2008; Russell, 2012). Although rock paintings 800 or more prescriptions comprising various
and archeological inscriptions can be consid- herbs, animals, and minerals; a considerable
ered the first human–fauna interaction records number contain matter derived from, both wild
(see Baker, 1941), written documents have more and domestic, insects, reptiles, and fish (Alves
precisely recorded information about the inter- et al., 2013b; MacKinney, 1946).
action of ancient humans groups with their While animals and humans have shared a
regional fauna and their uses of those animals very long history, and humans have been accu-
(Alves and Souto, 2015). In every ancient culture mulating knowledge for untold generations
with a written language, people have recorded about the fauna with which they interact, the
useful knowledge about animals, plants, and origin of ethnozoology (like many other aca-
environments (Svanberg et al., 2011). demic disciplines) is more closely linked to the
Animals were linked to people in many ways naturalists and explorers who spread out about
in the cultural conceptions of the time, and the world starting in the 16th century. Until
contributed to defining royal institutions, as the beginning of the 19th century, most of our
well as solidifying emergent cosmologies that knowledge concerning the world’s biota, includ-
linked humans to celestial orbs, the earth, and ing its fauna, was derived from the reports of
the gods. These views were preserved in hiero- naturalists and explorers who recorded infor-
glyphs, papyrus documents, and other records mation about activities such as hunting and
left behind by ancient civilizations (Alves and fishing (Alves, 2017; D’Ambrosio, 2015). These
Souto, 2015). In ancient Egypt, for example, royal documents include the works of naturalists who
12 2. CONCEPTS IN ETHNOZOOLOGY
demonstrated interest in the fauna, as well as systematized by the naturalists, filtered by the
the zoological knowledge of native residents. scientific outlook predominant at that time, and
These naturalists generally compiled lists of subsequently incorporated into the growing uni-
native animals together with their regional and versal scientific pool. In the specific case of zool-
scientific names and descriptions of their uses ogy, the aid of the local populations was critical
(Sillitoe, 2006). Information concerning the use in many ways, especially in terms of locating,
of animals by indigenous populations in the collecting, and naming animals; preparing and
New World have been accumulating ever since preserving the specimens; discovering “new”
the first voyage of Columbus (Castetter, 1944). species; analyzing their habits and utilitarian
This tradition continued through the 19th and features; domesticating certain “wild” animals;
20th centuries, as exemplified by the voyage and in developing techniques and tools for cap-
of Darwin on the HMS Beagle during which he turing and preserving them.
recorded biological information about regional Moreira (2002) illustrates in a very interest-
ecosystems, and the work of Wallace during ing article the importance that native popu-
his stay in the Malaysian Archipelago (now lations had for the natural sciences by citing
Indonesia). The zoological information con- the examples of three notable naturalists, the
tained in these pioneering works was likewise Englishmen Alfred R. Wallace (1823–1913) and
codependent on the work of Linnaeus—one of H W. Bates (1825–1892) and the Swiss explorer
the most notable naturalists of that time (Ellen, Louis Agassiz (1807–1873), who all undertook
2004). We can thus interpret these works as the expeditions to Brazil during the 19th century.
roots of what was to become the science of eth- These scientists were very successful during
nozoology, as these European naturalists and their expeditions and made enormous contri-
explorers not only sought to learn about new butions to zoology through their descriptions
regions of the world but also to take advantage of thousands of species. Henry Walter Bates,
of those new natural resources by identifying for example, collected 14,712 different spe-
the animal species found there and document- cies (mostly insects)—of which 8000 were new
ing their uses. Some pioneer ethnographers, to science—during 11 years in the Amazon
such as Alfred Cort Haddon and Franz Uri Boas, region. His records of his trips throughout the
however, were more interested in studying the Amazon region cite about 135 different people
local communities that they encountered rather (most of them by name) from all walks of life,
than their surrounding environments (Sillitoe, who helped during the fieldwork and in the
2006). localization and capture of specimens: business-
The interests of naturalists went well beyond men, farmers, workers, slaves, military person-
simply recording the uses of the fauna by the nel, Amerindians, and hunters. Similarly, many
native populations, and the direct or indirect parts of the travel logs of Wallace in Brazil and
help of these local populations was indispens- many of the scientific articles based on these
able to discovering thousands of additional expeditions record the participation of local
animal species. As was exemplified by Moreira inhabitants in collecting specimens and map-
(2002), 19th century naturalists spread out over ping the Negro River. Wallace often noted in his
the planet and enormously amplified the sci- records the importance of the native knowledge
entific knowledge of the time—and the suc- of the flora and fauna and their geographic dis-
cess of their scientific expeditions were often tributions. Likewise, Louis Agassiz (who led the
greatly dependent on the collaboration of native Thayer expedition from 1865 to 1866) repeatedly
or resident communities and their traditional pointed out that the contributions of the local
knowledge. This traditional knowledge was habitants were essential to the success of the
The Origin and History of Ethnozoology 13
fieldwork program, like locating and capturing traditional zoological knowledge has inspired
Amazonian fish and describing their behavior. many hypotheses and has been used to
This traditional or local zoological knowl- complement ecological and zoological stud-
edge1 (one of the focal points of ethnozoological ies (see Chapter 23, in this book–The Role of
studies) has been extremely useful to zoological Ethnozoology in Animal Studies).
studies of numerous species, and many descrip-
tions have likewise been based on specimens col-
lected by native hunters/fishers accompanying THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF
naturalists during their expeditions (Alves and ETHNOZOOLOGY
Souto, 2015). It can thus be seen that the histories
of zoology and ethnozoology overlap—although The first written documents that recorded
the roles of native populations were not always connections between mankind and nature (e.g.,
fully recognized. Moreira (2002) pointed out that those produced in Greece, Egypt, and Asia)
although there were many diverse references in (Alves et al., 2013b; Bala, 1985) represent historic
the travel logs and letters of naturalists to the records of the even more ancient relationships
essential aid provided by local habitants, this between our species and other living creatures.
information was rarely widely disseminated due Although these writings can be interpreted as
to the usually concise nature of scientific publi- the first ethnozoological records, ethnozoology
cations (books, reports, articles). This situation is a new formal science. These ancient records
contributed, among other factors, to the emer- were produced within different academic disci-
gence of the image of scientists as “hero-explor- plines such as anthropology, ethnology, archeol-
ers” who survived enormous dangers almost ogy, and medicine. Clément (1998) noted that
alone through herculean efforts, “discovering” “the origin of ethnobiology lato sensu lies deep in the
large numbers of new species of animals and mists of time, when the first hominids took an inter-
plants. It was often emphasized that these scien- est in plants and animals; it can rightly be argued
tists had encountered hostile relationships with that the foundations of ethnobiology were laid long
indigenous groups (which probably only rarely before the 19th century, and are to be sought in the
occurred), but little note was otherwise made of sacred texts, oral or written, that form the substruc-
the existence of these people, or that their sup- tures of many civilizations.” Nonetheless, from an
port and knowledge had been extremely impor- academic perspective, the beginnings of what
tant to the success of their scientific quests. would become ethnobiological studies occurred
It is important to remember that local popu- only in 1874 (Hidayati et al., 2015), when Stephen
lations continue to provide much more than Powers first used the term “aboriginal botany”
basic logistic support to zoologists and ecolo- to refer to the uses of plants by Amerindians in
gists (research areas that commonly count on California (Powers, 1874). At about the same
the cooperation and assistance of local inhabit- time, other researchers were likewise becom-
ants)—including indicating sites that are best ing interested in the uses of biodiversity in the
for mounting collecting equipment (and many American west by its native inhabitants (Brown,
times even directly collecting the specimens 1868; Palmer, 1871, 1878; Stearns, 1889).
themselves)—thus perpetuating the roles and The history of ethnobiology and its prin-
practices that were available to early natural- cipal subdivisions (ethnobotany and ethno-
ists. Additionally, the information retained in zoology) overlap, as has been addressed by
1 For
a discussion about the use of the terms “local knowledge” or “traditional Knowledge” see Alves and
Albuquerque (2010).
14 2. CONCEPTS IN ETHNOZOOLOGY
a number of different authors who gener- Curiously, although ethnobotany and eth-
ally rely on the historiography proposed by nozoology are considered subdivisions of eth-
Clément (1998) that divides their development nobiology, these terms appeared before the
into three phases. The first phase (1860–99), recognition of the latter discipline. The term
known as the preclassical phase, corresponds “ethnobiology” was first used in the United
to the period during which terms such as eth- States in 1935 (Castetter, 1935) as a fusion of two
nobotany and ethnozoology were first coined; elements, “ethnos” and “biology”—after the
the second phase (1950–80s), known as the fashion of many similar terms formed since the
classical period, was characterized by a num- words “ethnography” and “ethnology” were
ber of linguistic studies and ethnobiological first coined in the late 18th century (Clément,
classifications; the third phase, known as the 1998). Ethnobotany received its widely accepted
postclassical period (1990s), was characterized name from Hershberger in 1895 (Hershberger,
by true partnerships between Western scien- 1885). The first academic publication with an
tists and local populations, with greater rec- ethnozoological orientation (using the prefix
ognition and respect for traditional ecological “ethno”) was prepared by Stearns (1889), who
knowledge. discussed “ethno-conchology” (which would
Hunn (2007) added one more phase to those now be placed within the sub-area of ethno-
proposed by Clement. For Hunn (2007), Phase 1 malacology) in his study of the use of shell
(1895–1950) was characterized by the documen- money—even before the term “ethnobotany”
tation of “useful” plants and animals; Phase 2 was coined. The term ethnozoology first
(1954–70s) corresponds to the phase of “cogni- appeared in 1899, as a branch of zootechnology
tive ethnobiology” or “ethnoscience”; Phase (Mason, 1899) and, somewhat later, Henderson
3 (1970–80s) saw the rise of ethnobiological and Harrington (1914) referred to ethnozoology
research with an ecological focus; in Phase 4 as the study of existing cultures and their rela-
(1990s), collaborative research arose, emphasiz- tionships with the animals in their surrounding
ing the rights of local populations (Hunn, 2002). environments. In 1944, Castetter coined the term
Wolverton (2013) suggested a fifth phase, “ethnobiology” to signify the use of plants and
although not indicating the exact year it was ini- animals by “primitive” peoples (Castetter, 1944).
tiated (although it is presumed to have begun In addition to the abovementioned disciplines,
in 2001 and continues to the present day). This ethnobiology encompasses a wide range of
phase is characterized by interdisciplinary stud- subdisciplines such as ethnoecology, ethnophar-
ies and the recognition of the importance of eth- macology, ethnomedicine, ethnomycology, and
nobiological research in the context of complex ethnoveterinary (Hidayati et al., 2015). A time-
environmental and cultural changes. We believe line of important events in ethnozoology history
that another aspect has become important in this can be seen in Fig. 2.1.
last phase—the use of folk ecological knowledge Although animals have played important
as a complement to traditional ecological/zoo- roles in all human cultures since remote times,
logical research (see Chapter 23, in this book)— specific studies concerning the uses of animals
and the appreciation of this local knowledge have consistently lagged behind similar studies
has noticeably grown among researchers who devoted to plants. Although the fields of ethno-
are not necessarily ethnobiologists (Alves and botany and ethnozoology appeared at approxi-
Nishida, 2002; Anadón et al., 2010; Beaudreau mately the same time, the former grew more
and Levin, 2014; Kotschwar Logan et al., 2015; rapidly in terms of its bibliographic produc-
Rasalato et al., 2010; Ziembicki et al., 2013; tion, which resulted in its greater consolidation.
Zuercher et al., 2003). The first publications in ethnozoology did not
The Origin and History of Ethnozoology 15
FIGURE 2.1 A timeline of important events in ethnozoology history, with emphasis on Latin America.
stimulate much additional research, although a themes such as sexual differentiation, devel-
considerable body of knowledge concerning the opment, and feeding habits among animals.
utilization of animals by traditional societies can Various other ethnozoological studies were
be found in a variety of earlier publications not undertaken during this period that revealed the
produced with a specific focus on ethnozoology grasp of traditional societies of the principals of
(Birket-Smith, 1976; Hornaday, 1889; Merriam, classification, nomenclature, and species identi-
1905; Steensby, 1917). fications (Berlin et al., 1973; Bright and Bright,
After the publication of the first articles 1965; Diamond, 1966).
clearly focusing on ethnozoology (Mason, 1899; Ethnozoologists and other researchers are
Stearns, 1889), later publications became con- currently concentrating their efforts on research
centrated on utilitarian aspects and folk classifi- areas that include (1) cultural perception and
cations of animals (Sturtevant, 1964). Following zoological classification systems (Fleck et al.,
the preclassical tendencies of ethnobiology in 1999; Holman, 2005; Mourão et al., 2006; Posey,
1908, Chamberlin listed the common names of 1982); (2) importance and presence of animals in
animals used by the Goshute Amerindians of stories, myths, and beliefs (Descola, 1998; Léo
North America (Chamberlin, 1908). In a later Neto et al., 2009; Lewis, 1991); (3) biological and
phase, ethnozoological researchers focused on cultural aspects of animal use by human soci-
the perceptions and classifications of animals. eties (Dias et al., 2011; Gunnthorsdottir, 2001;
Within this context, the works of Malkin con- Posey, 1978); (4) methods of obtaining and pre-
cerning the ethnozoology of the Seri, Sumu, and paring organic substances extracted from ani-
Cora peoples in Mexico (Malkin, 1956a,b; 1958) mals (for cosmetic, ritualistic, medicinal, or food
called attention to the high numbers of taxa in uses, etc.) (Alves, 2006, 2009; Alves et al., 2007;
folk taxonomies and to native knowledge about Barboza et al., 2007; Costa-Neto and Oliveira,
16 2. CONCEPTS IN ETHNOZOOLOGY
2000; Lev, 2003, 2006; Rocha, 2007; Rocha et al., skills, methods, practices, and beliefs concerning
2008; Rosa et al., 2011; Vázquez et al., 2006); (5) animal care (Alves et al., 2010c; Mathias-Mundy
domestication, examining the cultural bases and McCorkle, 1989; Souto et al., 2013). When the
and the biological consequences of long-term use of animals for medicinal purposes is consid-
faunal resource management (Digard, 1992; ered, ethnozoology has close links with two other
Haudricourt, 1977); (6) biological heterogene- areas: ethnopharmacology and ethnomedicine.
ity and the cognitive processes involved in Ethnozoology can now be further subdivided
the management and conservation of natural into taxon-specific fields of interest (Alves, 2017)
resources (Alves and Nishida, 2002; Fleck and (Fig. 2.2). A good example is ethnoprimatology,
Harder, 2000); and (7) collection techniques and a field that focuses on ecological and cultural
their impacts on animal populations (Alves interconnections between human and nonhuman
et al., 2009; Balée, 1985; Bezerra et al., 2012; primates (Riley, 2006; Sponsel, 1997; Waller, 2016).
Nishida et al., 2006; Nordi et al., 2009; Quijano- Different subdivisions of ethnozoology have sim-
Hernández and Calmé, 2002; Souto, 2007). ilarly arisen to examine human interactions with
The number of publications concerning eth- other important animal taxa (Alves, 2017) such as
nozoology has steadily increased, reflecting insects (ethnoentomology), mollusks (ethnoma-
the interests of researchers in diverse areas. It lacology), fish (ethnoichthyology), birds (ethno-
is important to note that interactions between ornithology), mammals (ethnomastozoology),
humans and animals are investigated in many and reptiles/amphibians (ethnoherpetology)
different disciplines that have obvious links (Alves, 2017). It should be noted that these subdi-
with ethnozoology. One example is zooarchae- visions are related to animal groups of established
ology (which focuses on studies of the remains importance to humans and, in some cases, they
of animals found in archaeological sites), which have been further detailed to consider specific
is important for understanding ancient relation- animal groups such as elephants and primates,
ships between humans and their environments designating areas such as ethnoelephantology
(especially between humans and animal popu- (Locke, 2013) and ethnoprimatology (Sponsel,
lations; see Reitz and Wing, 2008). Some authors 1997), as subdivisions of ethnomastozoology;
have adopted the term ethnozooarchaeology snakes (ethno-ophiology) (Joshi and Joshi, 2010)
(Albarella and Trentacoste, 2011; Broderick, 2016) as a subdivision of ethnoherpetology; and butter-
to describe the study of human–animal relation- flies (ethnolepidopterology) (Parsons, 1991) as a
ships from the examination of animal remains subdivision of ethnoentomology. There are even
found at archeological sites. Another discipline groups with lesser utilitarian importance that
having clear intersections with ethnozoology is have nonetheless inspired the creation of further
anthrozoology, which, according to Bradshaw subsections of ethnozoology, such as sponges
(2010), consists of the study of animal–human (ethnospongiology) (Docio et al., 2013).
interactions. This discipline generally focuses In spite of this increase in the numbers of sub-
more directly on human interactions with divisions within ethnozoology, theoretical and/
domestic animals, investigating themes such or methodological advances have not neces-
as keeping pets (especially dogs and cats) and sarily followed—only an inflationary tendency
animal welfare. Another discipline that dem- of ethnobiological terminology. This tendency
onstrates historical links with ethnozoology is can be viewed on one hand as a simple effort
ethnozootechny, which investigates local knowl- to organize the “taxonomy” of the various fields
edge, practices, and beliefs related to animal hus- within ethnozoology, or simply as an excessive
bandry (Alves et al., 2010a); also closely related growth of terminologies that are not fully justi-
is ethnoveterinary, which studies knowledge, fied epistemologically.
Ethnozoology: What Are the Marching Orders? 17
ETHNOZOOLOGY: WHAT ARE THE can lead to theoretical stagnation and reduced
MARCHING ORDERS? originality and innovation.
Many works have considered themes such as
Ethnozoology has drawn the attention of hunting, fishing, and the use and commerce of
researchers, in the biological sciences, who have the native fauna. On a global scale, some disci-
found that such studies can aid in evaluating the plines have demonstrated strong growth, such as
impact of human populations on other animal ethnoprimatology. The term ethnoprimatology,
species, and in the development of sustainable first coined by Leslie Sponsel (1997), has been a
management plans—and are therefore funda- field of growing interest, as demonstrated by the
mental to conservation efforts. Ethnozoological publications of books (Fuentes and Wolfe, 2002;
publications have greatly increased now as Waller, 2016; Dore et al., 2017) and special issues
judged by reviews published in Latin America on ethnoprimatology in important primatology
(Albuquerque et al., 2013), although the com- journals (Fuentes and Hockings, 2010). In spite
ponent studies have largely been concentrated of these advances, however, the study of ethno-
in Brazil (Alves and Souto, 2011) and Mexico zoology now requires a process of self-criticism
(Santos-Fita et al., 2012). Importantly, these to evaluate its advances. While large volumes
publications generally cite high proportions of of information have been produced concern-
national research efforts, as opposed to inter- ing interaction between humans and animals,
national studies, indicating a tendency toward there have not been corresponding advances in
insularity (Campos et al., 2016). This same phe- theoretical terms, and relatively few works have
nomenon is usually associated with low levels been guided by theories or hypotheses—which
of international cooperation (as can be seen in has led to its criticism as a weak and immature
Latin America; Albuquerque et al. (2013)), which science. It should be noted that ethnobotany has
18 2. CONCEPTS IN ETHNOZOOLOGY
suffered the same criticism, even though this Albuquerque, 2002; Alves and Pereira Filho,
sister discipline is older and has been consid- 2007; Alves and Rosa, 2008; Alves and Santana,
erably more productive (see Albuquerque and 2008; Broad, 2001; Yi-Ming et al., 2000).
Hanazaki (2009)). In spite of their cultural and economic impor-
Unsurprisingly, many ethnozoological stud- tance, however, very few ethnozoological inves-
ies have been associated with two central activi- tigations have examined these public markets in
ties undertaken by local communities: hunting any depth (Alves et al., 2013c). In many coun-
and fishing (Alves, 2012)—although ethno- tries (such as Brazil) legal implications related
zoological studies can also be undertaken in to the commercialization of wild animals (espe-
urban environments, especially in localities such cially those listed as threatened with extinc-
as zoos, schools, and traditional markets (Alves tion) contribute greatly to the difficulty of freely
et al., 2013c, 2007, 2014; Marques and Guerreiro, obtaining ethnozoological information in public
2007). In pointing out that the study of ethno- places.
zoology “begins at home,” Overal (1990) has In many countries, especially those located in
called attention to the study of ethnozoological tropical regions that have great faunal diversity,
phenomena within our own culture (as opposed the illegal commerce in wild animals removes
to examining culturally distant societies)—men- many species from their natural environments.
tioning groups and/or phenomena that could This is certainly one of the gravest threats to
be studied from an ethnozoological perspective many populations of native species, and eth-
in both Western and traditional cultures, such nozoological studies constitute an invaluable
as: animal trainers; farmers who “call in” cattle, tool for understanding the socioeconomic and
pigs, and other animals; breeders of dogs and cultural context into which the commercializa-
other pets; urban hunters; and breeders of fight- tion of the wild fauna is embedded—an essen-
ing cocks and other animals kept for “sport” and tial aspect to the elaboration of conservation
betting purposes. proposals.
Public markets likewise present excellent
opportunities for developing ethnozoologi-
cal studies in urban areas (Alves, 2006; Alves FINAL CONSIDERATIONS
et al., 2010d, 2010e, 2013a, 2013c; Alves and
Rosa, 2008; Apaza et al., 2003; Fernandes- The connections between humans and other
Ferreira et al., 2012; Ferreira et al., 2013; Noss, species of animals involve predatory and sym-
1998; Oliveira et al., 2010; Williams et al., 2013) biotic relations established in remote times, but
as many live animals (both wild and domesti- academic scholars have begun to examine this
cated) and various products of animal origin can theme with intensity. Human communities have
be found there; and these are traditional sites for developed a huge store of knowledge about
exchanging and acquiring cultural information. animals down through the centuries (passed
Depending on their size, these public markets from generation to generation, largely through
commonly have specific areas that sell animals oral traditions) that is closely integrated with
and animal parts, and the vendors can provide many other cultural aspects. This zoological
important information about the different ori- knowledge is an important part of the human
gins of those resources (Alves and Rosa, 2007). cultural heritage that has been accumulating for
Information about the exotic and native fauna of millennia.
a region obtained in public markets should be Interactions between people and animals are
very useful when evaluating conservation plans extremely varied and can be explored through
for those same natural resources (Almeida and disciplines associated with the social and
References 19
natural sciences, fostering the emergence of eth- Almeida, C.F.C.B.R., Albuquerque, U.P., 2002. Uso e con-
nozoological approaches—fundamental areas of servação de plantas e animais medicinais no Estado de
Pernambuco (Nordeste do Brasil): Um estudo de caso.
scientific research that examine historical, eco- Interciencia 27, 276–285.
nomic, sociological, anthropological, and envi- Alvard, M.S., Robinson, J.G., Redford, K.H., Kaplan, H.,
ronmental aspects of the relationships between 1997. The sustainability of subsistence hunting in the
humans and animals. These studies can aid in neotropics. Conservation Biology 11, 977–982.
the evaluation of the impacts of human popula- Alves, A.G.C., Albuquerque, U.P., 2010. “Ethno what?”
Terminological problems in ethnoscience with a special
tions on other animal species and in the devel- emphasis on the Brazilian context. In: Albuquerque, U.P.,
opment of sustainable management plans—and Hanazaki, N. (Eds.), Recent Developments and Case
are thus fundamental to conservation efforts. Studies in Ethnobotany. Nupeea, Recife, Brazil.
Additionally, local or traditional knowledge Alves, A.G.C., Pires, D.A.F., Ribeiro, M.N., 2010a.
about the fauna can be important to academic Conhecimento local e produção animal: uma perspectiva
baseada na Etnozootecnia. Archivos de Zootecnia 59,
research projects, and it offers the possibility of 45–56.
significant savings in comparison to the costs Alves, R.R.N., 2006. Uso e comércio de animais para fins
involved with conventional methodologies. medicinais e mágico-religiosos no Norte e Nordeste
Ethnozoological studies also facilitate commu- do Brasil, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências
nication between researchers and the agents Biológicas. Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João
Pessoa, Paraíba. 252 pp.
responsible for the elaboration of management Alves, R.R.N., 2009. Fauna used in popular medicine
plans and local human populations—which is of in Northeast Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology and
fundamental importance to the development of Ethnomedicine 5, 1–30.
efficient conservation strategies. Alves, R.R.N., 2012. Relationships between fauna and peo-
In spite of its historical roots and many con- ple and the role of ethnozoology in animal conservation.
Ethnobiology and Conservation 1, 1–69.
tributions, Clément (1998) observed that a large Alves, R.R.N., 2016. Domestication of animals. In:
proportion of the contemporary scientific pro- Albuquerque, U.P., Alves, R.R.N. (Eds.), Introduction
duction in ethnozoology still mirrors its classic to Ethnobiology. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, pp.
phase. This implies that the field of ethnozool- 221–225.
ogy has not accompanied the advances adopted Alves, R.R.N., 2017. Ethnozoology. In: Fuentes, A. (Ed.), The
International Encyclopedia of Primatology. Wiley, New
by its sister disciplines of ethnobotany and eth- Jersey.
noecology, although those areas are likewise Alves, R.R.N., Barboza, R.R.D., Souto, W.M.S., 2010b. A
passing through continuous processes of reflec- global overview of canids used in traditional medicines.
tion and self-criticism. Biodiversity and Conservation 19, 1513–1522.
Alves, R.R.N., Barboza, R.R.D., Souto, W.M.S., 2010c. Plants
used in animal health care in south and latin America:
References an overview. In: Katerere, R.D., Luseba, D. (Eds.),
Ethnoveterinary Botanical Medicine: Herbal Medicines
Albarella, U., Trentacoste, A., 2011. Ethnozooarchaeology: for Animal Health. CRC Press, New York, pp. 231–256.
The Present and Past of Human–animal Relationships, Alves, R.R.N., Lima, J.R.F., Araújo, H.F., 2013a. The live bird
first ed. Oxbow Books, Oxford, UK. trade in Brazil and its conservation implications: an over-
Albuquerque, U.P., Hanazaki, N., 2009. Five problems in view. Bird Conservation International 23, 53–65.
current ethnobotanical research—and some suggestions Alves, R.R.N., Medeiros, M.F.T., Albuquerque, U.P., Rosa,
for strengthening them. Human Ecology 37, 653–661. I.L., 2013b. From past to present: medicinal animals in a
Albuquerque, U.P., Silva, J.S., Campos, J.L.A., Sousa, R.S., historical perspective. In: Alves, R.R.N., Rosa, I.L. (Eds.),
Silva, T.C., Alves, R.R.N., 2013. The current status of Animals in Traditional Folk Medicine: Implications for
ethnobiological research in Latin America: gaps and per- Conservation. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 11–23.
spectives. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 9, Alves, R.R.N., Mendonça, L.E.T., Confessor, M.V.A., Vieira,
1–9. W.L.S., Lopez, L.C.S., 2009. Hunting strategies used in
Allaby, M., 2010. Animals: From Mythology to Zoology. the semi-arid region of Northeastern Brazil. Journal of
Facts On File, Inc., New York. Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 5, 1–50.
20 2. CONCEPTS IN ETHNOZOOLOGY
Alves, R.R.N., Nishida, A.K., 2002. A ecdise do caranguejo- Alves, R.R.N., Souto, W.M.S., Barboza, R.R.D., 2010f.
uçá, Ucides cordatus L. (Decapoda, Brachyura) na visão Primates in traditional folk medicine: a world overview.
dos caranguejeiros. Interciencia 27, 110–117. Mammal Review 40, 155–180.
Alves, R.R.N., Nogueira, E., Araujo, H., Brooks, S., 2010d. Bird- Alves, R.R.N., Souto, W.M.S., Mourão, J.S., 2010g. A
keeping in the Caatinga, NE Brazil. Human Ecology 38, Etnozoologia no Brasil: Importância, Status atual e
147–156. Perspectivas, first ed. NUPEEA, Recife, Brazil.
Alves, R.R.N., Oliveira, M.G.G., Barboza, R.R.D., Lopez, Alves, R.R.N., Vieira, K.S., Santana, G.G., Vieira, W.L.S.,
L.C.S., 2010e. An ethnozoological survey of medicinal Almeida, W.O., Souto, W.M.S., Montenegro, P.F.G.P.,
animals commercialized in the markets of Campina Pezzuti, J.C.B., 2012b. A review on human attitudes
Grande, NE Brazil. Human Ecology Review 17, 11–17. towards reptiles in Brazil. Environmental Monitoring
Alves, R.R.N., Pereira Filho, G.A., 2007. Commercialization and Assessment 184, 6877–6901.
and use of snakes in North and Northeastern Brazil: Alves, R.R.N., Vieira, W.L.S., Santana, G.G., 2008. Reptiles
implications for conservation and management. Biodivers used in traditional folk medicine: conservation implica-
Conserv 16, 969–985. tions. Biodiversity and Conservation 17, 2037–2049.
Alves, R.R.N., Rosa, I.L., 2007. Zootherapy goes to town: the Anadón, J.D., Giménez, A., Ballestar, R., 2010. Linking local
use of animal-based remedies in urban areas of NE and N ecological knowledge and habitat modelling to predict
Brazil. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 113, 541–555. absolute species abundance on large scales. Biodiversity
Alves, R.R.N., Rosa, I.L., 2008. Use of tucuxi dolphin sotalia and Conservation 19, 1443–1454.
fluviatilis for medicinal and magic/religious purposes in Apaza, L., Godoy, R., Wilkie, D., Byron, E., Huanca, T.,
North of Brazil. Human Ecology 36, 443–447. Leonard, W.R., Peréz, E., Reyes-García, V., Vadez, V., 2003.
Alves, R.R.N., Rosa, I.L., Albuquerque, U.P., Cunningham, Markets and the use of wild animals for traditional medi-
A.B., 2013c. Medicine from the wild: an overview of cine: a case study among the Tsimané ameridians of the
the use and trade of animal products in traditional Bolivian rain forest. Journal of Ethnobiology 23, 47–64.
medicines. In: Alves, R.R.N., Rosa, I.L. (Eds.), Animals Baenninger, R., 1995. Some consequences of animal domesti-
in Traditional Folk Medicine. Springer, Heidelberg, cation for humans. Anthrozoos 8, 69–77.
Germany, pp. 25–42. Baker, F.C., 1941. A study of ethnozoology of the prehis-
Alves, R.R.N., Rosa, I.L., Léo Neto, N.A., Voeks, R., 2012a. toric Indians of Illinois. Transactions of the American
Animals for the gods: magical and religious faunal use Philosophical Society 32, 51–77.
and trade in Brazil. Human Ecology 40, 751–780. Bala, P., 1985. Indigenous medicine and the state in ancient
Alves, R.R.N., Rosa, I.L., Santana, G.G., 2007. The role of India. Ancient Science of Life 5, 1–4.
animal-derived remedies as complementary medicine in Balée, W., 1985. Ka’apor ritual hunting. Human Ecology 13,
Brazil. BioScience 57, 949–955. 485–510.
Alves, R.R.N., Santana, G.G., 2008. Use and commer- Barboza, R.R.D., Souto, W.M.S., Mourão, J.S., 2007. The
cialization of Podocnemis expansa (Schweiger 1812) use of zootherapeutics in folk veterinary medicine in
(Testudines: Podocnemididae) for medicinal purposes the district of Cubati, Paraíba State, Brazil. Journal of
in two communities in North of Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 3, 1–14.
Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 4, 1–6. Beaudreau, A.H., Levin, P.S., 2014. Advancing the use of
Alves, R.R.N., Silva, V.N., Trovão, D.M.B.M., Oliveira, J.V., local ecological knowledge for assessing data-poor spe-
Mourão, J.S., Dias, T.L.P., Alves, A.G.C., Lucena, R.F.P., cies in coastal ecosystems. Ecological Applications 24,
Barboza, R.R.D., Montenegro, P.F.G.P., 2014. Students’ 244–256.
attitudes toward and knowledge about snakes in the Berlin, B., Breedlove, D.E., Raven, P.H., 1973. General prin-
semiarid region of Northeastern Brazil. Journal of ciples of classification and nomenclature in folk biology.
Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 10, 1–8. American Anthropologist 75, 214–242.
Alves, R.R.N., Souto, W.M.S., 2010. Etnozoologia: conceitos, Bezerra, D.M.M., Araujo, H.F.P., Alves, R.R.N., 2012.
considerações históricas e importância. In: Alves, R.R.N., Captura de aves silvestres no semiárido brasileiro: técni-
Souto, W.M.S., Mourão, J.S. (Eds.), A Etnozoologia cas cinegéticas e implicações para conservação. Tropical
no Brasil: Importância, Status atual e Perspectivas. Conservation Science 5, 50–66.
NUPEEA, Recife, PE, Brazil, pp. 19–40. Birket-Smith, K., 1976. Ethnographical Collections from the
Alves, R.R.N., Souto, W.M.S., 2011. Ethnozoology in Brazil: Northwest Passage. AMS Press, New York.
current status and perspectives. Journal of Ethnobiology Bradshaw, J.W.S., 2010. Anthrozoology. In: Mills, D.S.,
and Ethnomedicine 7, 1–18. Marchant-Forde, J.N. (Eds.), The Encyclopedia of Applied
Alves, R.R.N., Souto, W.M.S., 2015. Ethnozoology: a brief Animal Behaviour and Welfare. CABI, Wallingford, UK, pp.
introduction. Ethnobiology and Conservation 4, 1–13. 28–30.
References 21
Bright, J.O., Bright, W., 1965. Semantic structures in Dodd Jr., C.K., 1993. Strategies for Snake Conservation,
Northwestern California and the sapir-whorf hypothesis. Ecology and Behavior. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York.
American Anthropologist 67, 249–258. Dore, K.M., Riley, E.P., Fuentes, A., 2017. Ethnoprimatology:
Broad, S., 2001. The Nature and Extent of Legal and Illegal A Practical Guide to Research at the Human-nonhuman
Trade in Wildlife. Hughes Hall, International and Africa Primate Interface. Cambridge University Press.
Resources Trust, Seminar on Wildlife Trade Regulation Ellen, R., 2004. From ethno-science to science, or ‘What the
and Enforcement. TRAFFIC, Cambridge, pp. 17–18. indigenous knowledge debate tells us about how sci-
Broderick, L., 2016. People with Animals: Perspectives and entists define their project’. Journal of Cognition and
Studies in Ethnozooarchaeology. Oxbow Books, Oxford, Culture 43, 409–450.
UK. Emery, K.F., 2007. Assessing the impact of ancient Maya ani-
Brown, R., 1868. On the vegetable products used by the mal use. Journal for Nature Conservation 15, 184–195.
North-west American Indians as food and medicine, Fernandes-Ferreira, H., Mendonça, S.V., Albano, C., Ferreira,
in the arts, and in superstitious rites. Transactions and F.S., Alves, R.R.N., 2012. Hunting, use and conserva-
Proceedings of the Botanical Society of Edinburgh 9, tion of birds in Northeast Brazil. Biodiversity and
378–396. Conservation 21, 221–244.
Campos, J.L.A., Sobral, A., Silva, J.S., Araújo, T.A.S., Ferreira- Ferreira, F.S., Fernandes-Ferreira, H., Leo Neto, N., Brito,
Júnior, W.S., Santoro, F.R., Santos, G.C., Albuquerque, S.V., Alves, R.R.N., 2013. The trade of medicinal animals
U.P., 2016. Insularity and citation behavior of scien- in Brazil: current status and perspectives. Biodiversity
tific articles in young fields: the case of ethnobiology. and Conservation 22, 839–870.
Scientometrics 109, 1037–1055. Fleck, D.W., Harder, J.D., 2000. Matses Indians rainfor-
Castetter, E.F., 1935. Uncultivated native plants used as est habitat classifi cation and mammalian diversity in
sources of food. University of New Mexico Bulletin 4, Amazonian Peru. Journal of Ethnobiology 20, 1–36.
1–63. Fleck, D.W., Voss, R.S., Patton, J.L., 1999. Biological basis
Castetter, E.F., 1944. The domain of ethnobiology. American of saki (Pithecia) folk species recognized by the Matses
Naturalist 78, 158–170. Indians of Amazonian Peru. International Journal of
Chamberlin, R.V., 1908. Animal names and anatomical terms Primatology 20, 1005–1027.
of the Goshute Indians. Proceedings of the Academy of Foster, M.S., James, S.R., 2002. Dogs, deer, or guanacos: zoo-
Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 60, 74–103. morphic figurines from pueblo grande, central Arizona.
Clément, D., 1998. The historical foundations of ethnobiol- Journal of Field Archaeology 29, 165–176.
ogy (1860–1899). Journal of Ethnobiology 18, 161. Franke, J., Telecky, T.M., 2001. Reptiles as Pets: An
Costa-Neto, E.M., Oliveira, M.V.M., 2000. Cockroach is good Examination of the Trade in Live Reptiles in the United
for Asthma: Zootherapeutic practices in northeastern States. Humane Society of the United States, Washington.
Brazil. Human Ecology Review 7, 41–51. Fuentes, A., Hockings, K.J., 2010. The ethnoprimato-
D’Ambrosio, U., 2015. Theoretical reflections on ethnobiol- logical approach in primatology. American Journal of
ogy in the third millennium. Contributions to Science 10, Primatology 72, 841–847.
49–64. Fuentes, A., Wolfe, L.D., 2002. Primates Face to Face:
Descola, P., 1998. Estrutura ou sentimento: a relação com o Conservation Implications of Human-nonhuman
animal na Amazônia. Mana 4, 23–45. Primate Interconnections. Cambridge Univerity Press,
Diamond, J.M., 1966. Zoological classification system of a Cambridge, UK.
primitive people. Science 151, 1102–1104. Gunnthorsdottir, A., 2001. Physical attractiveness of an
Dias, T.L.P., Leo Neto, N.A., Alves, R.R.N., 2011. Molluscs in animal species as a decision factor for its preservation.
the marine curio and souvenir trade in NE Brazil: spe- Anthrozoös 14, 204–215.
cies composition and implications for their conservation Hamblin, N.L., 1985. The role of marine resources in the
and management. Biodiversity and Conservation 20, Maya economy: a case study from Cozumel, Mexico. In:
2393–2405. Pohl, M. (Ed.), Prehistoric Lowland Maya Environment
Digard, J.P., 1992. Un aspect méconnu de l’histoire de and Subsistence Economy. Harvard University Press,
l’Amérique: la domestication des animaux. L’Homme 32, Cambridge, MA, USA, pp. 159–173.
253–270. Haudricourt, A.G., 1977. Note d’ethnozoologie. Le rôle
Docio, L., Costa-Neto, E.M., Pinheiro, U.S., Schiavetti, des excrétats dans la domestication. L’Homme 17,
A., 2013. Folk classification of sea sponges (Animalia, 125–126.
Porifera) by artisanal fishermen of a traditional fishing Henderson, J., Harrington, J.P., 1914. Ethnozoology of the
community at Camamu Bay, Bahia, Brazil. Interciencia Tewa Indians. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin
38, 60–66. 56, 1–76.
22 2. CONCEPTS IN ETHNOZOOLOGY
Hershberger, J.W., 1885. The purpose of ethnobotany. Lev, E., 2003. Traditional healing with animals (zootherapy):
Botanical Gazette 21, 146–164. medieval to present-day Levantine practice. Journal of
Hidayati, S., Franco, F.M., Bussmann, R.W., 2015. Ready for Ethnopharmacology 85, 107–118.
phase 5-current status of ethnobiology in Southeast Asia. Lev, E., 2006. Ethno-diversity within current ethno-pharma-
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 11, 2–8. cology as part of Israeli traditional medicine A review.
Holley, D., 2009. The History of Modern Zoology. Available Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 2, 1–12.
at: http://suite101.com/article/the-history-of-modern- Lewis, I.M., 1991. The spider and the pangolin. Man 26,
zoology-a135787. 513–525.
Holman, E.W., 2005. Domain-specific and general properties Lidgard, H., 2005. Quackery or Complementary Medicine - a
of folk classifications. Journal of Ethnobiology 25, 71–91. Historical Approach to the Present Situation. University
Hoover, C., 1998. The US Role in the International Live of Lund, Lund, Sweden.
Reptile Trade: Amazon Tree Boas to Zululand Dwarf Locke, P., 2013. Explorations in ethnoelephantology: social,
Chameleons. TRAFFIC North America, Washington, historical, and ecological intersections between Asian
USA. elephants and humans. Environment and Society:
Hornaday, W.T., 1889. The Extermination of the American Advances in Research 4, 79–97.
Bison, with a Sketch of its Discovery and Life History. MacKinney, L.C., 1946. Animal substances in materia
Report of National Museum, Washington, USA. medica. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied
Hunn, E., 2007. Ethnobiology in four phases. Journal of Sciences 1, 149–170.
Ethnobiology 27, 1–10. Malkin, B., 1956a. Seri ethnozoology: a preliminary report.
Hunn, E.S., 2002. Traditional environmental knowledge: Davidson Journal of Anthropology 2, 73–83.
alienable or inalienable intellectual property. In: Stepp, Malkin, B., 1956b. Sumu ethnozoology: herpetologi-
J.R., Wyndham, R.S., Zarger, R.K. (Eds.), Ethnobiology cal knowledge. Davidson Journal of Anthropology 2,
and Biocultural Diversity. ISE/University of Georgia 165–180.
Press, Athens, Georgia, pp. 3–10. Malkin, B., 1958. Cora ethnozoology, herpetological knowl-
Inskip, C., Zimmermann, A., 2009. Human-felid conflict: a edge; a bioecological and cross cultural approach.
review of patterns and priorities worldwide. Oryx 43, Anthropological Quarterly 31, 73–90.
18–34. Marques, J.G.W., Guerreiro, W., 2007. Répteis em uma Feira
Jorgenson, J.P., 1998. The Impact of Hunting on Wildlife in Nordestina (Feira de Santana, Bahia). Contextualização
the Maya Forest of Mexico, Timber, Tourists and Temples: Progressiva e Análise Conexivo-Tipológica. Sitientibus
Conservation and Development in the Maya Forests of Série Ciências Biológicas 7, 289–295.
Belize, Guatemala and Mexico. Island Press, Washington Martínez, C., 2008. Las aves como recurso curativo en el
D.C, pp. 179–194. México antiguo y sus posibles evidencias en la arqueozo-
Joshi, T., Joshi, M., 2010. Ethno-ophiology-A traditional ología. Arqueobios 11–18.
knowledge among tribes and non-tribes of Bastar, Mason, O.T., 1899. Aboriginal american zoötechny. American
Chhattisgarh. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge Anthropolosgist 1, 45–81.
9, 137–139. Masson, M.A., 1999. Animal resource manipulation in ritual
Kalof, L., 2007. Looking at Animals in Human History, first and domestic contexts at postclassic maya communities.
ed. Reaktion Books, London. World Archaeology 31, 93–120.
Kalof, L., Resl, B., 2007. A Cultural History of Animals in Masson, M.A., Peraza Lope, C., 2008. Animal use at the
Antiquity, first ed. Berg publishers, Oxford, UK/New Postclassic Maya center of Mayapán. Quaternary
York. International 191, 170–183.
Kotschwar Logan, M., Gerber, B.D., Karpanty, S.M., Justin, Mathias-Mundy, E., McCorkle, M.C., 1989. Ethnoveterinary
S., Rabenahy, F.N., 2015. Assessing carnivore distribu- Medicine: An Annotated Bibliography. Bibliographies in
tion from local knowledge across a human-dominated Technology and Social Change. Technology and Social
landscape in Central-Southeastern Madagascar. Animal Change Programme. IOWA State University, Ames,
Conservation 18, 82–91. IOWA, EUA.
Kyselý, R., 2008. Frogs as a part of the Eneolithic diet. McKillop, H., 1984. Prehistoric Maya reliance on marine
Archaeozoological records from the Czech Republic resources: analysis of a midden from Moho Cay, Belize.
(Kutná Hora-Denemark site, Rivnác Culture). Journal of Journal of Field Archaeology 11, 25–35.
Archaeological Science 35, 143–157. McKillop, H.I., 1985. Prehistoric exploitation of the mana-
Léo Neto, N.A., Brooks, S.E., Alves, R.R.N., 2009. From tee in the Maya and circum-Caribbean areas. World
Eshu to Obatala: animals used in sacrificial rituals at Archaeology 16, 337–353.
Candomble “terreiros” in Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology McNeely, J.A., 2001. Religions, traditions and biodiversity.
and Ethnomedicine 5, 1–23. COMPAS Magazine 20–22.
References 23
Merriam, C.H., 1905. The indian population of California. Rasalato, E., Maginnity, V., Brunnschweiler, J.M., 2010. Using
American Anthropologist 7, 594–606. local ecological knowledge to identify shark river habitats
Moreira, I.C., 2002. O escravo do naturalista - O papel do in Fiji (South Pacific). Environmental Conservation 37,
conhecimento nativo nas viagens científicas do século 19. 90–97.
Ciência Hoje 31, 40–48. Raven, J.E., 2000. Plants and Plant Lore in Ancient Greece.
Mourão, J.S., Araujo, H.F.P., Almeida, F.S., 2006. Leopard’s Head Press, Oxford.
Ethnotaxonomy of mastofauna as practised by hunters Reitz, E.J., Wing, E.S., 2008. Zooarchaeology. Cambridge
of the municipality of Paulista, state of Paraíba-Brazil. University Press, Cambride, UK.
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 2, 1–7. Ribeiro, D., 1998. O processo civilizatório: etapas da evolução
Nishida, A.K., Nordi, N., Alves, R.R.N., 2006. Mollusc gath- sociocultural. Editora Companhia das Letras.
ering in Northeast Brazil: an ethnoecological approach. Riley, E.P., 2006. Ethnoprimatology: toward reconciliation
Human Ecology 34, 133–145. of biological and cultural anthropology. Ecological and
Nordi, N., Nishida, A.K., Alves, R.R.N., 2009. Effectiveness Environmental Anthropology 2, 75–86.
of two gathering techniques for ucides cordatus in Rocha, M.S.P., 2007. O Uso dos recursos biológicos pelas comu-
Northeast Brazil: implications for the sustainability of nidades de Barra de Mamanguape e Lagoa da Praia, no
mangrove ecosystems. Human Ecology 37, 121–127. Estuário do Rio Mamanguape, litoral Norte do Estado
Noss, A.J., 1998. Cable snares and bushmeat markets in a da Paraíba: Um enfoque Etnoecológcio. Departamento
central African forest. Environmental Conservation 25, de Biologia. Universidade Estadual de Paraíba, Campina
228–233. Grande, Brazil.
Oliveira, E.S., Torres, D.F., Brooks, S.E., Alves, R.R.N., Rocha, M.S.P., Mourão, J.S., Souto, W.M.S., Barboza, R.R.D.,
2010. The medicinal animal markets in the metropoli- Alves, R.R.N., 2008. Uso dos recursos pesqueiros no
tan region of Natal City, Northeastern Brazil. Journal of Estuário do Rio Mamanguape, Estado da Paraíba. Brasil.
Ethnopharmacology 130, 54–60. Interciencia 33, 903–909.
Overal, W.L., 1990. Introduction to ethnozoology: what Rosa, I.L., Oliveira, T.P.R., Osório, F.M., Moraes, L.E., Castro,
it is or could be. In: Posey, D.A., Overal, W.L. (Eds.), A.L.C., Barros, G.M.L., Alves, R.R.N., 2011. Fisheries
Ethnobiology: Implications and Applications. MPEG, and trade of seahorses in Brazil: historical perspective,
Belém, Brasil, pp. 127–129. current trends, and future directions. Biodiversity and
Palmer, E., 1871. Food Products of the North American Conservation 20, 1951–1971.
Indians. Report to the Commissioner of Agriculture for Russell, N., 2012. Social Zooarchaeology: Humans and Animals
1870. (Washington, DC). in Prehistory. Cambridge University Press, Cambrige, UK.
Palmer, E., 1878. Plants used by the Indians of the United Santos-Fita, D., Villamar, A.A., Domínguez, M.A., Martínez,
States. American Naturalist 12, 593–606. M.Q., 2012. La etnozoología en México: la producción
Parsons, M., 1991. Butterflies of the Bulolo-wau Valley. bibliográfica del siglo XXI (2000–2011). Etnobiología 10,
Bishop Museum Press, Honolulu, Hawaii. 41–51.
Pohl, M., 1976. Ethnozoology of the Maya: An Analysis of Sax, B., 2002. The Mythological Zoo: An Encyclopedia of
Fauna from Five Sites in Petén, Guatemala. Harvard Animals in World Myth, Legend and Literature. ABC-
University, Boston. CLIO, Inc., Santa Barbara, USA.
Pohl, M., 1981. Ritual continuity and transformation in Sillitoe, P., 2006. Ethnobiology and applied anthropology: rap-
Mesoamerica: reconstructing the ancient Maya cuch rit- prochement of the academic with the practical. Journal of
ual. American Antiquity 46, 513–529. the Royal Anthropological Institute 12, S119–S142.
Posey, D.A., 1978. Ethnoentomological survey of Amerind Souto, F.J.B., 2007. Uma abordagem etnoecológica da
Groups in lowland Latin America. The Florida pesca do caranguejo, Ucides cordatus, Linnaeus, 1763
Entomologist 61, 225–229. (Decapoda: Brachyura), no manguezal do Distrito de
Posey, D.A., 1982. The importance of bees to Kayapo Indians Acupe (Santo Amaro-BA). Biotemas 20, 69–80.
of the Brazilian Amazon. The Florida Entomologist 65, Souto, W.M.S., Pinto, L.C., Mendonça, L.E.T., Mourão, J.S.,
452–458. Vieira, W.L.S., Montenegro, P.F.G.P., Alves, R.R.N., 2013.
Powers, S., 1874. Aboriginal botany. Proceedings of the Medicinal animals in ethnoveterinary practices: a world
California Academy of Sciences 5, 373–379. overview. In: Alves, R.R.N., Rosa, I.L. (Eds.), Animals in
Prins, H.H.T., Grootenhuis, J.G., Dolan, T.T., 2000. Wildlife Traditional Folk Medicine. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany,
Conservation by Sustainable Use. Kluwer Academic pp. 43–66.
Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands. Sponsel, L.E., 1997. The human niche in Amazonia: explora-
Quijano-Hernández, E., Calmé, S., 2002. Patrones de cacería tions in ethnoprimatology. In: Kinzey, W.G. (Ed.), New
y conservación de la fauna silvestre en una comunidad World Primates: Ecology, Evolution and Behaviour.
Maya de Quintana Roo, México. Etnobiología 2, 1–18. Aldine e Gruyter, New York, pp. 143–165.
24 2. CONCEPTS IN ETHNOZOOLOGY
Stearns, R.E.C., 1889. Ethno-conchology: A Study of Williams, V.L., Cunningham, A.B., Bruyns, R.K., Kemp, A.C.,
Primitive Money. Report of the United States National 2013. Birds of a feather: quantitative assessments of the
Museum for 1887. United States Government official diversity and levels of threat to birds used in African
press, Washington, USA. traditional medicine. In: Alves, R.R.N., Rosa, I.L. (Eds.),
Steensby, H.P., 1917. An anthropological study of the origin Animals in Traditional Folk Medicine: Implications
of the Eskimo Culture. Meddelelser Om Grønland 53, for Conservation. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, pp.
39–228. 383–420.
Sturtevant, W.C., 1964. Studies in ethnoscience. American Wolverton, S., 2013. Ethnobiology 5: interdisciplinarity in an
Anthropologist 66, 99–131. era of rapid environmental change. Ethnobiology Letters
Svanberg, I., Łuczaj, Ł., Pardo-de-Santayana, M., Pieroni, 4, 21–25.
A., 2011. History and current trends of ethnobiological Yi-Ming, L., Zenxiang, G., Xinhai, L., Sung, W., Niemelä, J.,
research in Europe. In: Anderson, E.N., Pearsall, D.M., 2000. Illegal wildlife trade in the Himalayan region of
Hunn, E.S., Turner, N.J. (Eds.), Ethnobiology. Wiley- China. Biodiversity and Conservation 9, 901–918.
Blackwell, New Jersey, pp. 189–212. Ziembicki, M.R., Woinarski, J.C.Z., Mackey, B., 2013.
Vázquez, P.E., Méndez, R.M., Guiascón, Ó.G.R., Piñera, Evaluating the status of species using Indigenous knowl-
E.J.N., 2006. Uso medicinal de la fauna silvestre en los edge: novel evidence for major native mammal declines
Altos de Chiapas, México. Interciencia 31, 491–499. in northern Australia. Biological Conservation 157, 78–92.
Waller, M.T., 2016. Ethnoprimatology: Primate Conservation Zuercher, G.L., Gipson, P.S., Stewart, G.C., 2003. Identification
in the 21st Century, first ed. Springer, Cham, of carnivore feces by local peoples and molecular analy-
Switzerland. ses. Wildlife Society Bulletin 31, 961–970.
C H A P T E R
3
Zooarcheology: Investigating Past
Interactions Between Humans and
Other Animals
Steve Wolverton, Lisa Nagaoka
University of North Texas, Denton, TX, United States
Ethnozoology
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809913-1.00003-X 25 © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
26 3. ZOOARCHEOLOGY
Driver, J.C., 2011. Identification, classification, and zooarchaeology (with comments). Ethnobiology Letters 2, 19–39.
Gobalet, K.W., 2001. A critique of faunal analysis; inconsistency among experts in blind tests. Journal of Archaeological
Science 28, 377–386.
Lyman, R.L., 2002. Taxonomic identification of zooarchaeological remains. The Review of Archaeology 23, 13–20.
Wolverton, S., 2013. Data quality in zooarchaeological faunal identification. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
20, 381–396.
TAPHONOMY
Brain, C.K., 1983. The Hunters or the Hunted? An Introduction to African Cave Taphonomy. University of Chicago Press,
Chicago.
Haynes, G., 1983. A guide for differentiating mammalian carnivore taxa responsible for gnaw damage to herbivore limb
bones. Paleobiology 9, 164–172.
Lyman, R.L., 1994. Vertebrate Taphonomy. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Lyman, R.L., 2010. What taphonomy is, what it isn’t, and why taphonomists should care about the difference. Journal of
Taphonomy 8, 1–16.
Marean, C.W., Spencer, L.M., 1991. Impact of carnivore ravaging on zooarchaeological measures of element abundance.
American Antiquity 56, 645–658.
Nagaoka, L., Wolverton, S., Fullerton, B., 2008. Taphonomic analysis of the Twilight Beach seals. In: Clark, G., Leach,
F., O’Connor, S., (Eds.), Islands of inquiry: colonisation, seafaring, and the archaeology of Maritime Landscapes, Terra
Australis vol. 29, pp. 475–498.
Stiner, M.C., 1994. Honor Among Thieves: A Zooarchaeological Study of Neanderthal Ecology. Princeton University Press,
Princeton, NJ.
Wolverton, S., Randklev, C.R., Kennedy, J.H., 2010. A conceptual model for freshwater mussel (family: Unionidae) remain
preservation in zooarchaeological assemblages. Journal of Archaeological Science 37, 164–173.
QUANTIFICATION
Grayson, D.K., 1979. On the quantification of vertebrate archaeofaunas. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory
2, 199–237.
Grayson, D.K., 1984. Quantitative Zooarchaeology: Topics in the Analysis of Archaeological Faunas. Academic Press, New
York.
Grayson, D.K., Frey, C.J., 2004. Measuring skeletal part representation in archeological faunas. Journal of Taphonomy 2,
27–42.
Lyman, R.L., 1994. Quantitative units and terminology in zooarchaeology. American Antiquity 59, 36–71.
Lyman, R.L., 2008. Quantitative Paleozoology. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Marean, C.W., Kim, S.Y., 1998. Mousterian large-mammal remains from Kobeh Cave behavioral implications for
Neanderthals and early modern humans. Current Anthropology 39, S79–S114.
Wolverton, S., Dombrosky, J., Lyman, R. L., 2016. Practical significance: Ordinal scale data and effect size in zooarchaeology.
International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 26, 255–265.
a This table is not intended to extensively cover the literature in these areas but represents readings we assign on these topics in our zooarcheology classes.
28 3. ZOOARCHEOLOGY
Zooarcheologists use NISP of faunal remains Thus, MNI solves the problem of multicount-
to contrast the taxonomic abundance of vari- ing or interdependence inherent with NISP. Its
ous animals (e.g., species) from an assemblage. use, however, introduces a separate problem
Comparatively, one might explore whether termed the effect of aggregation. Depending
or not the taxonomic abundance of a species on how the researcher separates or aggregates
(or higher-level taxonomic category) differs assemblages into larger or smaller subsamples,
between assemblages or changes over time, the most abundant element is likely to change.
which could indicate a change in subsistence One might study a faunal assemblage from a
strategy or local environment. In addition, the stratum with three excavation levels; the stra-
zooarcheologist might also tally the NISP of tum as a whole might have humeri of a species
particular skeletal parts from a single type of as the most abundant element, with perhaps 9
animal in an assemblage to address research lefts and 7 rights represented, equaling MNI of
questions about butchery patterns, carcass pro- 9. Broken down by level, however, MNI could
cessing, and/or transport of animal resources change. If Level I had 4 lefts and 1 right, Level II
from hunting locations to camps or villages. An had 2 lefts and 6 rights, and Level III had 3 lefts
inherent weakness of NISP, because it is a tally and 0 rights, the MNI for Level I would equal
of fragments and whole elements, is that differ- 4, that for Level II would equal 6, and that for
ential fragmentation can lead to inflated counts Level III would equal 3. MNI for the three levels
in one or a few categories and deflated counts in added together would then be 13 instead of 9 for
others, particularly at ratio scale. This is known the stratum depending on whether or not one
as the problem of specimen interdependence, aggregated the stratum as a whole or summed
which amounts to double- (or triple- or greater) the MNI for the level assemblages. Thus, NISP
counting. Because of the potential deflation and and MNI have contrasting strengths and weak-
inflation effects of interdependence, some quan- nesses as quantitative units; MNI overcomes
tification experts in zooarcheology have con- interdependence but introduces effects of
cluded that NISP is at best an ordinal scale as aggregation, whereas NISP overcomes prob-
opposed to ratio-scale measure of taxonomic or lems of aggregation but introduces a problem
element abundance (e.g., Grayson, 1984; Lyman, of interdependence. Fortunately, multiple stud-
2008). Ordinal-scale measures convey more- ies have shown that at ordinal scale, MNI and
than and less-than relationships but do not pro- NISP tend to correlate to one another, and in
vide the precision to determine the magnitude such cases, aggregation is a bigger problem than
of difference. interdependence. Because MNI is derived from
The MNI is calculated to overcome the prob- NISP, we advocate that zooarcheologists always
lem of interdependence. In a faunal assemblage, report NISP and that if MNI is used researchers
MNI is the number of individual animals rep- clearly present how it is calculated.
resented by the tallied fragments and whole Regardless of which quantitative unit one
bones. Specimens are visually inspected in uses, MNI or NISP, to compare taxonomic
terms of morphology to determine if more than and/or element abundances, quantitative zoo-
a single element from a single animal of the archeological data are at best ordinal scale.
species (or higher-level taxon) is represented. Zooarcheological data are produced from obser-
For paired elements (e.g., humeri, femora, tib- vations of faunal remains from assemblages that
iae, and the like), this inspection is done with were not randomly sampled from prehistoric ani-
left- and right-side elements and portions of mal populations, passing through the so-called
elements. The element that is most commonly “cultural filter” (Daly, 1969). Faunal remains
occurring in the assemblage represents the MNI. also pass through a taphonomic history, which
A Theoretical Framework 33
may or may not reduce confidence in the rep- Wolverton et al. (2016). The statistical assump-
resentativeness of past animal populations. The tions we do or do not make influences the way
zooarcheologist may be interested in target vari- that we logically frame research questions using
ables that relate to the life assemblage (the past theoretical frameworks.
living population) of prehistoric animals, such
as the population’s age structure. Alternatively,
target variables might relate to the death assem- A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
blage, or what was killed and exploited by hunt-
ers in the past. Because the life assemblage and Anthropology and ecology provide a num-
death assemblages are not sampled directly, it is ber of theoretical perspectives with which to
imperative to understand the taphonomic his- frame zooarcheological research. The case study
tory of the faunal assemblage, but it also criti- we present in this chapter is framed within
cal that the zooarcheologist adopt conservative, optimal foraging theory (OFT) from evolution-
ordinal-scale statistical assumptions. ary ecology. As with any theory that concerns
A conservative approach can be accom- exploitation of animal populations and human
plished by adopting nonparametric (or ordinal- subsistence in the past, OFT requires fundamen-
scale) descriptive statistics, such as using the tal assumptions about human behavioral ecol-
median (nonparametric) as a measure of central ogy. We first discuss the basic premises of OFT
tendency as opposed to the mean (parametric) and then summarize a zooarcheological case
or the interquartile range (nonparametric) as study on prehistoric hunting at the Shag Mouth
opposed to the standard deviation or variance site in New Zealand. Comprehensive treatment
(parametric). In addition, there are several con- of OFT in ecology can be found in Stephens and
servative nonparametric inferential approaches Krebs (1986), and many details of its application
that are cousins to well-known parametric tests. within anthropology can be found in papers
For example, the independent two-sample t test, in Smith and Winterhalder (1992). In addition,
which assesses a difference in means, can be Broughton and Cannon (2010) edited a volume
replaced with the Mann–Whitney U test, which of important archaeological papers. We rely on a
assesses medians. Spearman’s rho correlation large body of ecological and zooarcheological lit-
(rank order nonparametric correlation) is a more erature to frame OFT; we present resources that
conservative approach than Pearson’s r correla- we consider to be essential reading in Table 3.2,
tion. The reason these descriptive and inferen- rather than cite multiple studies in this section.
tial tests are conservative is that they avoid the OFT developed within evolutionary ecology
assumption of normality, which directly concerns in the 1960s and 1970s. A commonly used model
the precise, ratio-scale variability of individuals framed within OFT is the prey choice model, which
within samples around means through reliance states that foraging decisions about which ani-
on the central limit theorem. Normality requires mals to hunt during foraging bouts are adaptive
assumptions about the way error behaves in in the short term (see The Optimality Assumption
random, representative samples at ratio scale. section). Foraging efficiency, or the net return of
Zooarcheologists, indeed archeologists in gen- hunting and gathering, is assumed to be maxi-
eral, study samples that are of unknown repre- mized. In terms of diet breadth, new species are
sentativeness and that are certainly not random, only added to the dietary array once foraging
making our data ordinal scale at best, necessi- efficiency declines to the point that it is optimal
tating this shift away from assuming normality. to include a less desirable (lower ranked) species.
For more detailed information on descriptive Thus, hunters are optimizers who maximize for-
and inferential statistics in zooarcheology, see aging efficiency during hunting trips.
34 3. ZOOARCHEOLOGY
Broughton, J.M., 1994. Late Holocene resource intensification in the Sacramento Valley, California: the vertebrate
evidence. Journal of archaeological Science 21, 501–514.
Broughton, J.M., 1997. Widening diet breadth, declining foraging efficiency, and prehistoric harvest pressure:
ichthyofaunal evidence from the Emeryville Shellmound, California. Antiquity 71, 845–862.
Broughton, J.M., Cannon, M.D. (Eds.), 2010. Evolutionary Ecology and Archaeology: Applications to Problems in
Human Evolution and Prehistory. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.
Broughton, J.M., Cannon, M.D., Bartelink, E.J., 2010. Evolutionary ecology, resource depression, and niche construction
theory: applications to central California hunter-gatherers and Mimbres-Mogollon agriculturalists. Journal of
Archaeological Method and Theory 17, 371–421.
Butler, V.L., 2000. Resource depression on the northwest coast of North America. Antiquity 74, 649–661.
Cannon, M.D., 2003. A model of central place forager prey choice and an application to faunal remains from the
Mimbres Valley, New Mexico. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 22, 1–25.
Jones, E.L., 2006. Prey choice, mass collecting, and the wild European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Journal of
Anthropological Archaeology 25, 275–289.
Munro, N.D., 2004. Zooarchaeological measures of hunting pressure and occupation intensity in the Natufian. Current
Anthropology 45, S5–S34.
Nagaoka, L., 2001. Using diversity indices to measure changes in prey choice at the Shag River Mouth site, southern
New Zealand. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 11, 101–111.
Nagaoka, L., 2002. The effects of resource depression on foraging efficiency, diet breadth, and patch use in southern
New Zealand. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 21, 419–442.
Stiner, M.C., Munro, N.D., Surovell, T.A., Tchernov, E., Bar-Yosef, O., 1999. Paleolithic population growth pulses
evidenced by small animal exploitation. Science 283, 190–194.
Ugan, A., 2005. Does size matter? Body size, mass collecting, and their implications for understanding prehistoric
foraging behavior. American Antiquity 70, 75–89.
ECOLOGY
Charnov, E.L., 1976. Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theoretical Population Biology 9, 129–136.
Charnov, E.L., Orians, G.H., Hyatt, K., 1976. Ecological implications of resource depression. The American Naturalist
110, 247–259.
MacArthur, R.H., Pianka, E.R., 1966. On optimal use of a patchy environment. The American Naturalist 100, 603–609.
Orians, G.H., Pearson, N.E., 1979. On the theory of central place foraging. In: Horn, D.J., Stairs, G.R., Mitchell, R.D.
(Eds.), Analysis of Ecological Systems, Ohio State University Press, Columbus, pp. 155–177.
Schoener, T.W., 1971. Theory of feeding strategies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 2, 369–404.
Schoener, T.W., 1979. Generality of the size–distance relation in models of optimal feeding. The American Naturalist
114, 902–914.
Southwood, T.R.E., 1977. Habitat, the templet for ecological strategies? The Journal of Animal Ecology 46, 337–365.
Stephens, D.W., Krebs, J.R., 1986. Foraging Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
a This table is not intended to extensively cover the literature in these areas but represents readings we assign on these topics in our zooarcheology
classes.
A Theoretical Framework 35
Many zooarcheological studies document innovators who improve technological means for
resource depression, which is a decline in the hunting, fishing, gathering, and producing food,
availability of a prey population caused by and these processes have also received attention
actions of the predator. Charnov et al. (1976) in archeological studies. In literature, this is play-
envisioned three types of resource depres- ing out in terms of implementing niche construc-
sion: exploitation depression related to mortal- tion theory (NCT) in archeology, which holds
ity caused by predation (harvest); behavioral that humans (and other animals) are capable
depression due to changes in prey behavior in of modifying the selective environment includ-
proximity to predators (e.g., hiding); and micro- ing the possibility of increasing net return rates
habitat depression in which prey animals leave of resources. In sum, multivariate approaches
an area to avoid predators. Resource depression have been developed for application of OFT in
is at times misunderstood to mean “any decline zooarcheology. A common characteristic of zoo-
in prey populations”; however, animal resources archeological data is that samples are time-aver-
(or other types of resources) can decline in aged palimpsests representing multiple foraging
availability because of environmental change, bouts, which we believe has led some skeptics
which is an important alternative hypothesis to to conclude that researchers who employ OFT
resource depression. in zooarcheology may ignore the subtle ecolo-
Other zooarcheological studies employ the gies (sensu Wyndham, 2009) of human foraging
patch choice model, which shifts the geographic behaviors. We believe this skepticism is based on
scale of foraging efficiency to the types of habi- a misunderstanding of the optimality assump-
tats that are exploited. Resource patches become tion as invoked in archeology.
the spatial unit of foraging rather than the loca-
tion of individual prey animals, and decisions
about which ones to exploit are based on the net The Optimality Assumption
returns of the patch instead of the net returns of A critical assumption of OFT is that decisions
the animal. Charnov (1976) framed the marginal about prey selection are based on economic opti-
value theorem (MVT) to conceptualize how mization. Species that are included in the diet
foragers make decisions when resource depres- are taken upon encounter because it is adaptive
sion takes place within patches as occurred in or optimal to do so. What is meant by optimality?
the New Zealand example near the Shag Mouth According to famed British ecologist Southwood
site (see below). New patches may be added if (1977), an optimal decision occurs when the
the average net return rate for other available energetic returns of, say hunting here/now out-
patches decreases to the point that the new weigh those of waiting here, or waiting to go there/
patches are then profitable to exploit. later reflecting the constraints of time and space
Application of OFT in zooarcheology is often contingencies on decision-making (Fig. 3.1).
more nuanced than simple use of these mod- Alternatively, it may be favorable to wait here or
els, though they have been applied widely. to forage there later if local resources are depleted.
Theoretical expectations have been developed In terms of NCT, some organisms (humans in
related to foraging from central places, such as particular) can influence resource return rates
base camps. The MVT has also been applied at through modification of environments, trans-
a finer scale in butchery and transport studies. forming a previously undesirable resource into
Ranking of prey species in terms of foraging a more optimal one. For example, agricultural
returns often uses the proxy of body size, but intensification using the logic of Southwood’s
other currencies of net return have been concep- simple model (Fig. 3.1), would transform invest-
tualized such as prey speed. Clearly, humans are ment through technological innovation and
36 3. ZOOARCHEOLOGY
‘In the first place, the papyrus and reeds on its surface were burnt (curious to
relate, these green reeds burn readily when the marsh is dry), and in a few hours’
time the surface of the sudd was an expanse of blackened stalks and ashes. As
soon as the fire had died down, gangs of men were landed from the steamer and
employed in cutting trenches on the surface of the sudd. These trenches averaged
from 0·60 to 0·80 metre in width, and from 1 to 1·25 metres in depth—i.e., as deep
as the men could work. The surface was thus divided into a number of rectangular
blocks some 3 metres by 4 metres. To these blocks were attached, one by one,
steel hawsers and chains. This done, the steamer downstream went full speed
astern. It invariably took several pulls to detach a block, and in some instances as
many as nine were necessary. Both hawsers and chains kept constantly breaking,
although the former were calculated to stand a strain of 35 tons per square inch,
and the latter as much as 60 tons. As soon as a block was detached from the
mass, it was allowed to float downstream. It was curious to see the green reeds
and papyrus which had been confined beneath it reappear on the surface of the
water. A horrible stench prevailed from the rotting vegetation.’
‘Surely the hand of the Almighty has traced it across the desert that it might be
the union of distant nations. . . . Its mission is not yet accomplished; it is waiting to
be the road to civilize Africa. But it is not an Eastern nation, and not the
Mohammedan religion that can do it; and I am one of those who hope and believe
that Providence will destine it for England. An English Government and a handful
of Englishmen could do it. Cities would rise up at Assouan and Khartoum, whose
influence would be felt over the whole interior. . . . I know, alas! the spirit of the age
is against such thoughts, and there are even men who would wish to abandon our
Empire; but I speak the voice of thousands of Englishmen who, like myself, have
served their country abroad, and who do not love her least, who will never consent
to relinquish an Empire that has been won by the sword, and who think the best
way to preserve it is often by judicious extension.’
As with modern Egypt, so with the modern Soudan: the name of the
Albanian tobacco-seller is writ large upon the pages of her history. In
spite of the ancient connection between Egypt and Ethiopia, in spite
of the dependence of Egypt upon the Soudan for her water, the
warlike tribes of the south remained for more than 1,000 years free
from any attempt at domination by their neighbours. It was Mehemet
Ali who, in the year 1819, laid the foundations of the empire which
reached its furthest limits under the Khedive Ismail, an empire of
which the brief but disastrous history brought nothing but misery and
ruin to the Soudanese, and made the Soudan a name of fear and
trembling to every Egyptian peasant.
About A.D. 700 Arabs of the tribe of Beni Omr, driven out of Arabia,
crossed the Red Sea, and began to settle about Sennar, on the Blue
Nile. By degrees these fugitives, reinforced by other tribes, some
from Arabia direct, some, it is said, by way of Egypt and the
countries further west, swelled to an invading host and permeated
the whole of the Northern Soudan, and the original inhabitants were
largely converted to Islam. In the Sennar region the two principal
negro tribes were the Fung and the Hameg. The conquerors, while
they imposed their language and religion on the conquered, seemed
to have been absorbed into their ranks; for the distinction between
Arab and negro diminished, and the old tribal names reappeared. In
1493 Amara Dunkas, a sheikh of one of the Fung tribes, was
recognised as king of all the Fungs, and conquered all the country
on both sides of the Blue Nile from Khartoum to Fazokhl. The
negroes who remained in the country were merged in the Fungs.
The remainder emigrated to the mountains of Southern Kordofan,
where, under the name of Nubas, they have ever since maintained
themselves in a somewhat precarious independence against the
raids of the Arabs of the plains. About the same time was founded
the Sultanate of Darfur, which in time extended its dominion to the
banks of the Nile. South of these two powers the Shilluks and other
negro tribes continued, as before, generally engaged in some petty
warfare, and regarded as a convenient reservoir of slaves by their
Arab neighbours.
The Fung dynasty lasted 300 years, and attained a very
considerable position. About A.D. 1600 in the reign of Adlan, Sennar
even became famous for learning, and was the resort of many
scientists and philosophers from Cairo and Bagdad. In the reign of
King Baadi, 1719-1758, the fame of the kingdom of Sennar reached
its height. A quarrel arose with Abyssinia on account of some
presents from the King of France which had been intercepted by
Baadi. The Abyssinian King invaded Sennar with a great host, but
met with the most signal defeat. So great an event was heralded
throughout the Mohammedan East. The bazaars of Constantinople
and Delhi were alike filled with the renown of Sennar. Once more
crowds of learned and celebrated men flocked into the country from
every quarter. But it was the last flicker of sunlight before the night
fell. Baadi himself was deposed and exiled on account of his bad
administration. The Hameg tribe, long subject to the Fungs, began to
lift their heads. By 1790 the kingdom of the Fungs had disappeared,
and for thirty years the Hameg continued supreme. Fire and sword
was their sole notion of supremacy; it was no mere theory with them.
The country was utterly given over to anarchy when Mehemet Ali
determined to interfere.
The motives that prompted him were many; possibly, ardent
irrigationist that he was, the desire to secure the upper waters of the
Nile may have been among them; but beyond a doubt, like
Cambyses of old, his principal object was gold. Extraordinary
rumours were current as to an El Dorado in the south. Every officer
and man who took part in the expedition entertained the most
extravagant notions of gold-strewn districts. By means of this, and
also by securing the profitable traffic in slaves, Mehemet hoped to be
able to win sufficient resources to carry out his ambitious schemes in
Asia and Europe. It was also very convenient at the moment to find
employment for his irregular troops. It would be a mistake, however,
to explain his action wholly by such reasons as these. All through his
life ran the dream of posing as a second Napoleon. It is curious to
find that along with the army he sent a number of learned men and
skilled artisans, while it was announced that the object of the
invasion was to introduce the benefits of a regular government of
civilization. Mehemet Ali had closely studied the methods of his great
model.
But of all these designs only one, and that the worst, was destined
to be fulfilled. The slave-trade had always flourished in the Soudan.
The Arab States were founded upon slavery. Along the great Arbain
road, the desert ‘track of the forty days’ from Darfur to Assiout, yearly
caravans containing slaves as well as other merchandise passed
into Egypt; the Nile route served the same purpose, and from the
Red Sea ports there was a constant export trade to Arabia and
Turkey. All this was nothing compared to the dimensions which the
trade assumed under Egyptian rule. It became practically the sole
trade of the country; it reached like a pestilential blight even as far as
the Equator. Bitterly did the Soudan suffer for the Napoleonic ideas
of Mehemet, and bitter, but deserved, was the penalty which Egypt
had to pay for her misgovernment in the end. Even to-day among the
remotest tribes the name of ‘Turk’ stands for loathing and terror.
The army, commanded by Ismail, son of the Viceroy, reached
Sennar without opposition. Thence, accompanied by his brother
Ibrahim, he advanced to Fazokhl in search of the famous gold-mines
in the Beni Shangul. But the gold proved disappointing. Ibrahim
returned to Egypt, destined to win fame as the butcher of the
Peloponnese in the Greek War of Independence. The Arabs rose
against Ismail, and he had to return to defeat them. Unsuccessful in
his quest for gold, he had devoted all his energy to the slave-trade,
but his cruelties and barbarities were too much even for a people
familiar with the Hameg. The local chief at Shendi, appropriately
named El Nemr (the Tiger), invited him to a banquet. While he and
his followers, contrary to the precepts of their own Koran, drank
freely of the forbidden wine, straw was silently piled high about the
house and fired. To a man they perished in the flames.
Meantime, Achmet Bey, the Defterdar, had conquered the
province of Kordofan from the Sultan of Darfur. Hearing of Ismail’s
fate, he marched towards Shendi to avenge him. The story of what
happened, as told by the Egyptians, wears an ugly look. The details
are wanting, but, at any rate, few were left to tell the other side of the
story. At Metemmeh, on the bank of the Nile opposite Shendi, the
people sent messengers to sue for pardon. It was granted. But when
the Defterdar marched into the town a lance was thrown at him. The
pardon was at once rescinded, and a general massacre ensued. El
Nemr himself, however, had fled to Abyssinia. He, at any rate, had
no faith in Egyptian promises. The Defterdar then marched towards
Khartoum, and at Tuti Island another great slaughter took place. It
was a bad beginning. To the native Soudanese the distinction
between the benefits of a regular government of civilization and the
fire and sword of the Hameg must have seemed slight indeed.
To build aright on such foundations would have been difficult for a
nation of born administrators. For the Egyptians it was impossible.
There were among the Egyptian Governors of the Soudan honest
and righteous men, but, amid a crowd of officials bred and trained in
an atmosphere of corruption and slavery, their spasmodic efforts
after good only gave fresh opportunities for evil. Military stations
were established in various parts of the country for the sake of
security, and they became fountains of slave recruits to swell the
ranks of the army. The navigation of the White Nile was declared
free, and it became the favourite route of the slave-traders.
Khartoum, from a village of skins and reeds, rose to be a city of
bricks and the capital of the Soudan, but also a convenient and
central market for a huge slave-trade. The Abyssinians, who
espoused the cause of the Sennar rebels, were beaten back into
their mountains, but the savage methods of warfare only brutalized
and demoralized the victors. It speaks volumes for the barbarous
character of the times that when Adlan, the leader of the
Abyssinians, was captured by Kurshid, reputed the best of the
Governors of the Soudan, he was immediately impaled. The annals
of these years are filled with stories of famine and rebellion, and, to
add to the general desolation, cholera and other diseases constantly
ravaged the country.
But worse was to come. Down to 1853 the southernmost Egyptian
station was only 120 miles south of Khartoum. The annexed
provinces of Kordofan, Sennar, and Kassala (or Taka) groaned under
oppression and tyranny, but the negro inhabitants of the Upper White
Nile and the Bahr el Ghazal were still comparatively unmolested. In
that year the English Consul in the Soudan started a trading
expedition up the river. Other traders followed, who established
stations far up the country. Peaceful trading soon succumbed to the
temptations of the slave-trade. For the sake of protection, it began to
be found necessary to employ bands of armed Arabs or Nubians.
Gradually the European traders disappeared; by 1860 the last of
them had sold their stations to their Arab agents. No greater curse
was ever let loose upon a country than these human locusts, and the
Egyptian Government was directly responsible. Under the shallow
pretence of legitimate commerce, trading monopolies were leased to
these traders in various districts. The fact that the Government had
not a shadow of claim even by right of conquest to the territories
leased was no obstacle. All the country south of Kordofan and Darfur
along the White Nile or the Bahr el Ghazal was regarded as
peculiarly suitable for these nefarious bargains. The Khartoumers, as
they were called, because they had their headquarters in the capital,
established themselves everywhere, and became practically
independent potentates. With their armed bands of brigands they
raided the native tribes, and even used them to fight against each
other. Only the Dinkas, protected by the impenetrable marshes of the
sudd region, and the powerful and warlike Azande, or Niam-Niam, in
the south, were able to maintain themselves. But the Bongo, a
numerous and peaceful agricultural people, were easily reduced.
The fact that they had attained a higher civilization than their
neighbours (for they smelted the iron found in their swamps with
furnaces of clay and rude bellows, and worked it with stone
hammers on anvils of granite, made pottery, and even had some
acquaintance with surgery) only made them the more valuable in the
slave-market. The Jur, Dembo, and Golo tribes were likewise among
the principal sufferers. Anarchy is but a mild term for the condition of
affairs.
Some of these unhappy victims may have heard the news on their
way to the northern slave-market that slavery was abolished in the
Soudan. If so, it cannot have done much to sweeten their bondage
or to heal the strokes of the lash, yet a viceregal decree to that effect
had been solemnly promulgated at Berber in 1857. It was
characteristic of many of the descendants of Mehemet Ali that they
inherited great part of his intellectual vigour and wide sweep of
imagination without any of his executive capacity. Said Pasha, who
became Viceroy in 1854, visited the Soudan and clearly recognised
the failure of his foreign empire. A large force had to be maintained
to screw exorbitant demands out of a discontented population.
Agriculture was depressed, and every other industry was perishing
under a system of taxation vicious in itself, and collected by methods
which might have made a Verres blush. He determined to evacuate
the country. But the burden of the Soudan, so lightly taken up in
greed of gain, was not to be so lightly laid aside. Egypt was now
holding a wolf by the ears. The officials who battened on the ruin of
the country opposed a strenuous resistance. Things had come to
such a pass that the sheikhs and notables of the provinces
themselves feared that the withdrawal of one devil would be followed
by the entry of many. Said contented himself with reorganizing the
government and announcing a number of reforms of a drastic and
far-reaching nature, and then returned to Egypt. It was the first of
many reorganizations and many reforms, all of which were as
effective as the decree for the abolition of slavery. The plan of much
talking and little doing became a fixed principle of Soudan policy.
The story of the tax on sakiehs (water-wheels) affords a good
illustration of Egyptian methods. One of Said’s reforms was to fix this
tax at 200 piastres per annum. In less than nine years it had risen to
500 piastres. Jaaffar Pasha, who finally raised it to this extent,
declared openly that he fixed it at that rate in order to see how much
the peasants would really pay, and he hoped after a three years’ trial
to be able to arrive at a just assessment. It was not a very scientific
plan of taxation in any case, but, unfortunately, Jaaffar was removed
before the scheme had time to work out, and his successors,
absolutely indifferent to his motives, retained the tax, and even
further increased it. It was calculated that on average land the tax
often far exceeded the net returns for one sakieh. Even a ruined
wheel was liable to the full amount, and if an owner returned to it
after an interval he was saddled with the whole of the arrears. On the
same principle taxes continued to be charged on land and trees that
had long since been carried away by the floods. The natural results
followed. Many cultivators were ruined and reduced to beggary,
others fled the country, and much land went out of cultivation. In
1881 more than 2,000 sakiehs were lying derelict in Berber and
Dongola.
By the time Ismail Pasha came to the throne in 1863 it had
become abundantly clear that the Egyptians were unfit to govern the
Soudan. It looked as though in a few years the whole country would
have become a wilderness, totally uninhabited save for a few
wanderers, whose sole occupation would be selling each other into
slavery. And yet the next few years witnessed an enormous
extension of the Egyptian Empire, and Ismail himself enjoyed, until
the bubble burst, a great reputation as a genuine and whole-hearted
reformer. Nor was that reputation wholly undeserved. Strange
compound that he was of vast ambitions but changeable resolution,
of far-reaching sagacity but reckless carelessness, a Westerner in
the conception of his ideals but an Oriental in every sense in his
pursuit of them, he proved himself in his treatment of the Soudan, as
in other spheres, to possess many of the elements of greatness. If
he failed, it was partly because the evil was beyond cure: the
impending catastrophe was too great to be averted. His employment
of Baker and Gordon and other Europeans showed that he realized
the incapacity of Egypt to perform the task by herself. That was in
itself a great step forward; undoubtedly it staved off for a little the day
of retribution. His eager support of the project of a railway to
Khartoum, first mooted by his predecessor, Said, showed a sound
appreciation of the position, though his ineffective attempts to carry it
out showed his weakness as clearly. But the whole hierarchy of
Egyptian officialdom was rotten to the core. The best of rulers
without good ministers is predestined to failure.
To add to a falling house must always be a desperate remedy. No
other course seemed open to Ismail, if he was really to cope with the
slave-trade. So long as the basin of the Upper Nile remained in the
hands of the ‘Khartoumers,’ the sources of the traffic flowed as
briskly as ever, and at the same time the Red Sea ports afforded
every facility for export. Accordingly, in 1866 Ismail purchased the
districts of Suakin and Massowah from the Turks by an increase of
tribute. In 1869 he took a still more important step, and determined
to annex the whole basin of the Nile. He invested Sir S. Baker with
absolute and despotic powers over the whole country south of
Gondokoro. No better choice could have been made. An
administrator of the best type, energetic and high-minded, Baker was
also no stranger to the scene of his mission. He had already in 1861
conducted an expedition up the White Nile to join hands with Speke
and Grant in their investigations of the sources of the Nile, and in
1864 he had discovered the Albert Nyanza.
A strong man was needed. The Khedive seemed in earnest, but
he was occupied with the Suez Canal and other matters nearer
home. His representatives in Khartoum took quite another view; it
was the custom of the Soudan Government to take away with one
hand what it gave with the other. Baker’s appointment bore the
ominous date of April 1, and the fact may well have recurred to him
when, on arriving at Khartoum towards the close of the year, he
discovered that the territory he was sent to annex had already been
leased by the Governor-General to a couple of notorious slave-
dealers. Every conceivable obstacle was put in his way by the
officials. But, in spite of all opposition, he organized his expedition,
and after a journey of incredible difficulty and labour, for the real
channel of the river was blocked by sudd, he reached Gondokoro in
May, 1871, and formally annexed it as ‘Ismailia.’ Next year he
passed south, and proclaimed Unyoro an Egyptian province,
organized a number of military posts, and entered into friendly
relations with M’tesa, King of Uganda. For the time the slave-traffic in
these new provinces was crushed. In 1873 Baker returned to Cairo
with a record of successful work behind him, which must have
astonished no one more than the Khedive himself.
But once the strong hand was removed, the stone which had
been heaved uphill with so much labour rolled swiftly down again.
Less than a year elapsed between the departure of Baker and the
arrival of Colonel Gordon, on his appointment as Governor-General
of Equatoria. Even in that short time the Egyptian occupation had
become merely nominal. Two posts only were held, Gondokoro and
Fatiko. Three large slave-trading stations were in full swing on the
Bahr el Zeraf alone, whilst on the Bahr el Ghazal the notorious
Zubehr had established himself as a practically independent
potentate, and was even preparing on his own account an invasion
of Darfur. The situation called forth Gordon’s fullest energies. Never
did he perform better work than during his three years in Equatoria.
As far as it could be done under Egyptian supremacy, he checked
the slave-trade and laid the foundations of good government. The
country was organized and divided into districts with proper
garrisons both along the Sobat and the White Nile. The tribes were
peaceful and contented. Communication was established with the
great lakes; Lake Albert Nyanza was for the first time
circumnavigated. A treaty was made with M’tesa, King of Uganda,
recognising his independence, and Emin Bey was sent to represent
Egypt at his Court. In 1876 Gordon returned to England.
In Egypt, meantime, the Khedive’s reckless extravagance was
fast hurrying him to disaster. But the more involved he became, the
more he extended his ambitions, like a ruined spendthrift who must
keep up his credit at any cost. Extension of his Empire became a
mania. After Equatoria came the turn of Darfur in 1874. Darfur had
maintained its independence for over 400 years under an unbroken
line of Sultans. One of them, Abd-el-Rahman the Just, had entered
into correspondence with Napoleon during his occupation of Egypt,
and congratulated him upon his defeat of the Mamelukes. Napoleon
replied in a remarkable letter:
‘To the Sultan of Darfur, 12 Messidor, Year VII. In the Name of God,
compassionate and merciful; there is no other God but God! To the Sultan of
Darfur, Abd-el-Rahman.
‘I have received your letter, and understand its purport. When your caravan
arrived I was absent in Syria punishing and destroying my enemies. I pray you
send me by the first caravan 2,000 black slaves, over sixteen years of age, healthy
and strong. I will buy them from you. Order your caravan to come immediately,
without delay. I have given orders for its protection all along the route.
‘Bonaparte, ‘Commander-
in-Chief.’