Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Oxide Electronics 1St Edition Asim K Ray Full Chapter
Oxide Electronics 1St Edition Asim K Ray Full Chapter
Ray
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebookmass.com/product/oxide-electronics-1st-edition-asim-k-ray/
Oxide Electronics
Wiley Series in Materials for Electronic &
Optoelectronic Applications
www.wiley.com/go/meoa
Series Editors
Professor Richard Curry, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
Professor Jun Luo, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Professor Harry E. Ruda, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
Published Titles
Bulk Crystal Growth of Electronic, Optical and Optoelectronic Materials, Edited by P. Capper
Properties of Group-IV. III–V and II–VI Semiconductors, S. Adachi
Charge Transport in Disordered Solids with Applications in Electronics, Edited by S. Baranovski
Thin Film Solar Cells: Fabrication, Characterization, and Applications, Edited by J. Poortmans and
V. Arkhipov
Dielectric Films for Advanced Microelectronics, Edited by M. R. Baklanov, M. Green, and K. Maex
Liquid Phase Epitaxy of Electronic, Optical and Optoelectronic Materials, Edited by P. Capper and M. Mauk
Molecular Electronics: From Principles to Practice, M. Petty
Luminescent Materials and Applications, A. Kitai
CVD Diamond for Electronic Devices and Sensors, Edited by R. S. Sussmann
Properties of Semiconductor Alloys: Group IV, III–V, and II–VI Semiconductors, S. Adachi
Mercury Cadmium Telluride, Edited by P. Capper and J. Garland
Zinc Oxide Materials for Electronic and Optoelectronic Device Applications, Edited by C. Litton, D. C.
Reynolds, and T. C. Collins
Lead-Free Solders: Materials Reliability for Electronics, Edited by K. N. Subramanian
Silicon Photonics: Fundamentals and Devices, M. Jamal Deen and P. K. Basu
Nanostructured and Subwavelength Waveguides: Fundamentals and Applications, M. Skorobogatiy
Photovoltaic Materials: From Crystalline Silicon to Third-Generation Approaches, Edited by G. Conibeer and
A. Willoughby
Glancing Angle Deposition of Thin Films: Engineering the Nanoscale, Matthew M. Hawkeye, Michael T.
Taschuk, and Michael J. Brett
Physical Properties of High-Temperature Superconductors, R. Wesche
Spintronics for Next Generation Innovative Devices, Edited by Katsuaki Sato and Eiji Saitoh
Inorganic Glasses for Photonics: Fundamentals, Engineering and Applications, Animesh Jha
Amorphous Semiconductors: Structural, Optical and Electronic Properties, Kazuo Morigaki, Sandor Kugler,
and Koichi Shimakawa
Microwave Materials and Applications 2V , Edited by Mailadil T. Sebastian, Rick Ubic, and Heli Jantunen
Molecular Beam Epitaxy: Materials and Applications for Electronics and Optoelectronics, Edited by Hajime
Asahi and Yoshiji Korikoshi
Metalorganic Vapor Phase Epitaxy (MOVPE), Edited by Stuart Irvine and Peter Capper
Optical Properties of Condensed Matter and Applications 2e, Edited by J. Singh
Oxide Electronics, Edited by Asim Ray
Oxide Electronics
Edited by
Asim Ray
Brunel University
London, UK
This edition first published 2021
© 2021 John Wiley and Sons Ltd
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in
any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by
law. Advice on how to obtain permission to reuse material from this title is available at http://www.wiley.com/go/
permissions.
The right of Asim Ray to be identified as author of the editorial material in this work has been asserted in
accordance with law.
Registered Offices
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA
John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK
Editorial Office
The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK
For details of our global editorial offices, customer services, and more information about Wiley products visit us at
www.wiley.com.
Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats and by print-on-demand. Some content that
appears in standard print versions of this book may not be available in other formats.
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
v
Contents
2.5.2 Supercapacitor 36
2.5.3 Rechargeable Batteries 38
2.5.4 Optoelectronics 39
2.6 Challenges and Outlook 40
References 41
3 Magnetic Interactions in the Cubic Mott Insulators NiO, MnO, and CoO and the
Related Oxides CuO and FeO 51
David J. Lockwood and Michael G. Cottam
3.1 Introduction 51
3.2 Spin–Spin Interactions 52
3.2.1 Magnetic Ordering Below T N 52
3.2.2 Magnetostriction 53
3.2.3 Magnetic and Electronic Excitations 54
3.3 Spin–Phonon Interactions 59
3.3.1 Phonon and Magnon Temperature Dependences 60
3.3.2 Phonon Mode Splitting Below T N 62
3.4 Other Related Materials 64
3.4.1 Cupric Oxide 64
3.4.2 Iron Monoxide 65
3.5 Conclusions 68
Acknowledgments 68
References 68
14 Future Tuning Optoelectronic Oxides from the Inside: Sol-Gel (TiO2 )x -(SiO2 )100-x 497
M.P. Worsley, J.G. Leadley, R.M.A. MacGibbon, T. Salvesen, P.A. Sermon and J.M.
Charnock
14.1 Introduction and Background 497
14.1.1 Photons and Wavetrains 497
14.1.2 Optoelectronic Oxides and Devices 497
14.1.3 TiO2 498
14.1.4 TiO2 -SiO2 498
14.1.5 Alkoxide and Sol-Gel Routes to TiO2 -SiO2 500
14.1.6 Miscibility and the % TiO2 (x) Added in TiO2 -SiO2 500
14.1.7 Doping of TiO2 -SiO2 501
14.1.8 Local Structure in TiO2 -SiO2 501
14.2 Hypothesis 503
14.3 Experimental 504
14.3.1 Materials 504
14.3.2 Preparations 504
14.3.3 Characterization Methods 504
14.4 Characterization Results 505
14.5 Discussion on Future Automated CALPHAD Design, Dip-Coating
Mechanical, and High-Throughput Screening of Novel Optoelectronic
Oxides and Devices 510
14.6 Conclusions on TiO2 -SiO2 Use 510
Acknowledgements 513
References 513
15 Binary Calcia-Alumina Thin Films: Synthesis and Properties and Applications 525
Asim K. Ray
15.1 Introduction 525
15.2 Structural and Physical Properties of C12A7 526
15.2.1 Thermal Stability 528
15.2.2 Ionic Conductivity and Mechanisms of Oxide–Ion Migration 529
xii Contents
Index 583
xiii
Series Preface
Arthur Willoughby
Peter Capper
Safa Kasap
xv
Preface
It is my great pleasure to thank Professor Safa Kasap for his many helpful suggestions.
He is the Editor-in-Chief of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics. His advice on
the selection of chapters and their authors has been very much appreciated.
Finally, the editor wishes to thank all the members of their family (Arunima, Raj,
Madhurima, Rishabh, Mayan and Reuben).
Asim Ray
London, UK, August 2016
xvii
List of Contributors
1.1 Introduction
Graphene, a single layer or a few layers of sp2 -hybridized graphitic carbon, has generated
much attention both in scientific and technological fields due to its unique physical and
chemical properties. As a conducting semimetal, graphene has attracted lots of inter-
ests for the research and applications of electronics. Mass preparation of graphene with
controllable size and economic cost is still a key challenge in its application to electronic
devices. Different synthesis methods of graphene leaded to its various properties. Since
the first successful preparation of graphene using the ‘scotch tape’ method, a series of
methods have been developed for the synthesis of graphene [1]. A significant proportion
of the graphene research has been realized by the graphene oxide (GO) and its reduced
form, the reduced graphene oxide (rGO) as the raw materials.
Graphite oxide is a compound of carbon (C), oxygen (O), and hydrogen (H), and has
been synthesized by Hummers’ method in 1958 [2], using the chemical reaction between
graphite, potassium permanganate (KMnO4 ), sodium nitrate (Na2 NO3 ), and sulfuric
acid (H2 SO4 ). The one-molecule-thick or few-layer version of the substance graphite
oxide is known as graphene oxide (GO). The GO is not conductive but can be reduced
by chemical reactions, thermal treatment, or many other methods, forming conduc-
tive rGO (Figure 1.1) [3]. So far, many methods have been well developed to synthesis
GO and rGO, including the chemical reduction, the microwave method, the plasma
method, the laser method, and the hydrothermal method. Other synthesis methods,
such as chemical vapour deposition (CVD) method, arc discharge method, ball milling
approach, solvent-assisted exfoliation, etc., were also devoted to develop high-quality
graphene, although these synthesis methods all have some trade-offs in terms of high
quality, high yield, and environmental friendliness.
OH
CO
O
OH O
Oxiation Reduction O
HO OH O
OH O
C O
O
HO
Figure 1.1 The chemical structures of graphene, graphene oxide (GO), the reduced graphene oxide
(rGO) and the conversion of graphene into GO and rGO via oxidation/reduction reactions. Source:
Reprinted with permission from ref. [3] Copyright 2018, Springer Nature.
4
Height (nm)
3
2
1
0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
4
Height (nm)
3
2
1
0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
4
Height (nm)
3
2
1
0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
Distance (microns)
Figure 1.2 AFM image of exfoliated graphene oxide (GO) sheets with three height profiles acquired in
different locations. Source: Reprinted with permission from ref. [5] Copyright 2007 Elsevier Ltd.
1.2 Synthesis and Characterizations of Graphene Oxide 3
synthesis. The strong microwave absorption capability of graphene oxide (GO) can
quickly remove oxygen-containing functional groups and further exfoliates GO. This
feature has a fatal temptation for the preparation of high-quality and pollution-free
graphene. As early as in 2011, microwave method was employed by Zhu et al. to
exfoliate GO [6]. Through the subsequent activation of KOH, they prepared graphene
with a high specific surface area (SSA) value of 3100 m2 g−1 and a high conductivity of
500 S m−1 . Another example of utilization of microwaves is the exfoliation of graphite
in molecularly engineered ionic liquids [7]. It is supposed that the cation–𝜋 interactions
can improve the affinity of graphene surfaces. The as-exfoliated graphene exhibited a
high single-layer proportion. Besides, I D /I G value of 0.14 and C/O ratio of 30 are close
to the values of the graphite precursor, indicating the excellent structural integrity.
One of the challenges on producing GO and rGO is the use of the toxic chemicals,
such as sulfuric acid and hydrazine hydrate. Lots of methods have been developed
to synthesize rGO by green reduction methods, using hydroiodic acid (HI), citric
acid, plant extracts, phytochemicals, or alternatively by thermal heating in the inert
atmosphere. In 2016, Voiry et al. reported on the fabrication of high-quality graphene
through the microwave reduction of GO [8]. This result attracted much interest because
they used a conventional microwave oven operated at 1000 W to rapidly and efficiently
reduce GO nanosheets with ∼50 μm size (Figure 1.3a). The higher-power microwave
pulses locally and ultra-fast-heated GO up to several thousand degrees to thoroughly
eliminate the oxygen functional groups and reorder the graphene basal plane. The
XPS results (Figure 1.3b) suggest that microwave-reduced GO (MW-rGO) shows a
negligible in-plane oxygen concentrations of ∼4 at. %. This oxygen content is much
lower than the theoretical value of rGO annealed at 1500 K [9]. The Raman spectra
of MW-rGO and other compared samples are shown in Figure 1.3c. The as-prepared
MW-rGO exhibited highly ordered graphene–like Raman features with sharp and
symmetrical 2D and G peaks and a very low I D /I G ratio (<0.1). It is also found that
MW-rGO shows higher I 2D /I G ratios and larger graphene domain sizes as compared
with rGO and solution-exfoliated flakes (Figure 1.3d). Although microwave method
has potential advantages in the efficient preparation of high-quality graphene, it should
be noted that the yield is so low that scale-up fabrication of high-quality graphene
remains a great challenge.
Plasma etching may not be able to precisely control the microstructure of the product
at the atomic level, and even may entail undefined structural disorders or defects of the
products. However, as a simple and efficient method, plasma etching still was widely
used for etching of carbon materials [10]. Graphene was once prepared by unzipping
of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) through plasma etching with poly(methyl methacrylate)
(PMMA) films [10]. Herein, PMMA protects CNTs as an etching mask during the etch-
ing process. The top side walls of CNTs were etched faster and removed by the plasma.
For 10 seconds of Agron (Ar) plasma etching, 20% of the starting CNTs were converted
into single- or few-layer graphene nanoribbons (GNRs) with ∼10–20 nm width and
2 nm height. Pang et al. reported on the patterned GN synthesized by means of an
oxygen-plasma etching approach from solution-processed GO films [11]. They used
low-cost aluminium as sacrificial metal and protective masks to remove the graphene
4 1 Graphene Oxide for Electronics
Graphite
Intensity (a.u.)
CVD graphene
MWrGO
rGO
–O
C–O C–sp2
C=O 3
GO C=O C–sp
2.0
CVD-graphene
CVD Graphene
1.5
Intensity (a.u.)
HOPG MWrGO
I2D/IG
Dispersed 1.0
MWrGO
Figure 1.3 (a) SEM of GO nanosheets. (b) High-resolution XPS C1s spectra and (c) Raman spectra of
MW-rGO and other compared samples. (d) Evolution of the I2D /IG ratio versus the crystal size (La).
Source: Reprinted with permission from ref. [8] Copyright 2016 The American Association for the
Advancement of Science (AAAS).
regions not covered by the aluminium when the sample was exposed to oxygen plasma.
They argued that oxygen-plasma etching of graphene film with sacrificial aluminium
contact patterns is an effective method for accurately controlling the size of graphene
electrodes. Wang and coworkers reported the preparation of graphene from the GO
using a radio frequency (RF) dielectric barrier discharge plasma system with different
plasma gas, such as O2 , N2 , and CH4 [12].
The laser method for the fabrication of graphene has advantages over the conventional
methods requiring high synthesis temperature or tedious post-treatments. Laser tech-
nologies enabled the process to be simpler and more compatible. Although this tech-
nology still faces the problem of large-scale production, it has been demonstrated to
produce high-quality graphene. El-Kady et al. used a standard LightScribe DVD opti-
cal drive to carry out the direct laser reduction of GO films to GN with high electrical
conductivity (1738 S m−1 ) and SSA (1520 m2 g−1 ), which can be used directly as super-
capacitor electrodes without the binder or current collectors [13]. The LightScribe laser
1.3 Energy Harvest Applications of Graphene Oxide 5
Laser
LSG GO P-LIG-70
Pine
(b) (c)
1 μm 1 μm
te
bstra
SA su Etching Transfer
PET-P
MG-MSCs &
Micro-patterns MG films
Line-filter device
(f)
Figure 1.4 (a) Preparation illustration of LSG and SEM images of cross-section of the product. Source:
Reprinted with permission from ref. [13] Copyright 2012 The American Association for the
Advancement of Science (AAAS). Morphology characterizations of laser-induced graphene (LIG)
derived from pine: (b) SEM image of pristine pine, (c) SEM, (d) TEM and (e) high-resolution TEM images
of P-LIG-70. The scale bars are 500 μm, 500 μm, 20 nm, and 4 nm, respectively. Source: Reprinted with
permission from ref. [14] Copyright 2017 The Wiley-VCH. (f ) Schematic illustrating the preparation
process of solid-state flexible MG-MSCs. Source: Reprinted with permission from ref. [15] Copyright
2018 Wiley-VCH.
was able to simultaneously reduce and exfoliate the GO sheets to form an open network
of laser-scribed graphene (LSG) (Figure 1.4a). This network structure with open pores
integrates the positive in terms of preventing the agglomeration of graphene sheets and
facilitating the electrolyte accessibility to improve the ionic diffusion.
The superior electronic and optical properties of graphene made it an ideal candidate
for various energy harvest device applications. Graphene and rGO could be used as the
6 1 Graphene Oxide for Electronics
I
3.0
–4 HOMO
–5 Graphene Ground state S
0
–4.5
anode
–6 Valence band spiro- Au
dye
–7 OMeTAD cathod –0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
TIO2 Voltage (V)
(b) (c)
Figure 1.5 Illustration and performance of solar cell based on graphene electrodes. (a) Illustration of
dye-sensitized solar cell using graphene film as electrode, the four layers from bottom to top are Au,
dye-sensitized heterojunction, compact TiO2 , and graphene film. (b) The energy level diagram of
graphene/TiO2 /dye/spiro-OMeTAD/Au device. (c) I-V curve of graphene-based cell (black) and the
FTO-based cell (grey), illuminated under AM solar light (1 sun). Source: Reprinted with permission from
ref. [16] Copyright 2008 The American Chemical Society.
transparent electrode, counter electrode, or interface layers in solar cell devices. Wang,
Zhi, and Müllen reported the ultra-thin transparent conductive electrode of rGO films
for the solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSC; Figure 1.5a). The GO produced by
the Hummers method were purified and dispersed in DI water, the 5–20-nm-thick GO
films were deposited on the substrate by dip coating followed by the thermal reduction.
The sheet resistance of the rGO was about 1.8 kΩ/sq, calculated conductivity was about
550 S cm−1 and a transparency of more than 70% over 1000–3000 nm. The work func-
tion of rGO is 4.42 eV (Figure 1.5b), close to the that of FTO electrode (4.4 eV). When
served as the anode, the graphene/TiO2 /dye/spiro-OMeTAD/Au DSSC device demon-
strated a short-circuit photocurrent density (I sc ) of 1.01 mA cm−2 with an open-circuit
voltage (V oc ) of 0.7 V. The calculated filling factor (FF) was 0.36 and the power conver-
sion efficiency was 0.26% (Figure 1.5c) [16].
Eda et al. reported the use of rGO thin films prepared by vacuum filtration and trans-
fer for the organic solar cells [17]. The GO dispersion was filtered through a 25-nm
pore-size mixed cellulose ester membrane, then the obtained films were transferred
onto the substrate and the ester membrane was then removed by acetone washes. The
GO was reduced by the hydrazine vapour and low temperature annealing at 200 ∘ C. The
sheet resistance of the rGO film was very high, about 70 kΩ/sq when the transmittance
of the film is approximately 65%. They successfully reduced the sheet resistance nearly
by a factor of 5 when by dipping in thionyl chloride (SOCl2 ) for 1 hour. The OPV devices
with the rGO films were very low, only about 0.1% due to the very large sheet resistance
(on the order of 105 ).
Wu et al. used the GO as the dual functional interface modifier for improving wetta-
bility and retarding recombination in indium tin oxide (ITO)/GO/CH3 NH3 PbI3-x Clx /
PCBM/ZnO/Al hybrid perovskite solar cells [18]. The GO serviced as the buffer
1.4 Energy Storage Applications of Graphene Oxide 7
DC
source GO rGO
GO
+ –
E;ectrochemical
deposition Joule heating
Pt plate
Carbon
cloth GO
solution CC GO-CC rGO-CC
(a) (b)
V 210.0
Water vapor
rGO-CC
Porous paper
Salt water
(c)
20.0
(f) (g)
Figure 1.6 The preparation of GO-CC and rGO-CC composites. (a) The electrochemical deposition of
graphene. (b) The schematic diagram of electrochemical deposition and joule heating process to
obtain rGO on carbon cloth samples. (c) The schematic diagram of rGO-CC composite heating
elements to generate water vapour with low voltage. (d–g) The photographs and infrared photos of
the rGO-CC (flat and bending). Source: Reprinted with permission from ref. [21] Copyright 2020 2020
WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.
8
10
2.4
106
F
2.0
4 1.6
10 0 3 6
I (q) (a.u.)
d (nm)
102 dexp = 7.0 nm
dexp = 3.9 nm
0 dexp = 2.2 nm
10 dexp = 0.5 nm
L
d
(b)
(f)
(e) (g)
Figure 1.7 (a) Top: SEM images of the LGG membranes when compressed to 3.2 nm (left) and 0.5 nm
(right), respectively. Bottom: Smallangle neutron scattering (SANS) patterns of the membranes with
dexp of 3.9 nm (left) and 0.5 nm (right), respectively. (b) A schematic illustration of the formation of
nanoslits array. (c) Reduced 1D SANS data offset from the absolute intensity scale. The upper right
inset is the slope F as a function of dexp . Source: Reprinted with permission from ref. [26] Copyright
2016, The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (d) Schematic diagram
illustrating the production of EGM-GO films. (e) Schematic illustration of the ASSC configuration and
digital photos of the solid-state electrolyte, the flexible ASSC, and the ASSC under various bending
angles. (f ) Cross-sectional SEM images of rGO film and (g) EGM-rGO (50% EG) film. Scale bars, 2 μm.
Source: Reprinted with permission from ref. [27] Copyright 2020, Nature Publishing Group.
through simply changing the ratio of two precursors, graphene oxide (GO) and exfoli-
ated graphene (EG) (Figure 1.7d). Figure 1.7f,g showed the cross-sectional SEM images
of rGO film and EGM-rGO (50% EG) film, respectively. This simultaneously freestand-
ing, dense yet porous electrode optimized the trade-off between gravimetric capaci-
tance (C wt ) and bulk density (𝜌), consequently delivery a high C ssa of 47 μF cm−2 and an
excellent Evol–stack of 88.1 Wh L−1 in an ionic liquid electrolyte. Furthermore, Figure 1.7e
showed that flexible all-solid-state supercapacitor (ASSC) with multiple optional out-
puts and superior stability was assembled by the as-synthesized graphene laminate film
electrode, demonstrating great potential as the power supply in practical applications.
Wang and coworkers prepared graphene by processing GO in different gas plasma,
such as O2 , N2 , and CH4 [12]. They compared the morphology and microstructure of dif-
ferent samples and evaluated their electrochemical properties as symmetrical electrode
of EDLCs. As displayed in Figure 1.8a, the treated GO-CH4 sample exhibited ultra-thin
and flat GNSs, which is similar to other samples synthesized by different plasma gas.
All plasma etching samples shown analogous XRD patterns with a broad peak at ∼24∘
corresponding to graphitic (002) plane (Figure 1.8b), indicating that the pristine GO
was successfully exfoliated into disordered and loosely packed graphene. Figure 1.8c
shows the CV curves of the electrodes at a scanning rate of 20 mV s−1 between the
potential of 0–1 V. All the typical and rectangular shape of CV curves indicate good
EDLCs behaviour. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements were
conducted in the frequency range of 10–100 kHz. The Nyquist plots in Figure 1.8d dis-
play that the as-prepared three samples presented small resistances (6.6 Ω for GO-O2 ,
10.2 Ω for GO-N2 , 10.0 Ω for GO-CH4 ), which are beneficial to the high performance
EDLCs electrode material.
1.4.2 Batteries
Graphene and rGO could form stacked multilayer structures, which can host the ions,
making them be attractive and promising for battery applications. Yoo et al. used the
GNS materials prepared via the chemical reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide, as the
anode of lithium secondary batteries (LIB) [28]. The CNS has much larger specific capac-
ity of 540 mAh g−1 , much larger than that of the graphite anode (372 mAh g−1 ). They
successfully enhanced the specific capacity up to 730 and 784 mAh g−1 through control-
ling of the intergraphene sheet distance of between the GNSs, by hybriding fullerenes
(C60 ) molecules or CNT during the reduction of GO using hydrazine hydrate.
Similar to CNT and graphene, layers or nanotube of TMD materials have wide appli-
cation in batteries and supercapacitors due to their unique structure. Chen, Zhao, and
Wu et al. proposed and demonstrated a unique one-dimensional and two-dimensional
(1D + 2D) structure based on tungsten disulphide (WS2 ) nanotubes with rGO as the
anode for lithium-ion batteries (Figure 1.9a) [29]. The multilayer WS2 nanotube has
the coaxial multilayer structure and the hollow core, offering the space for the lithium
ion storage, but the material suffered from poor conductivity. By compositing with 2D
layered rGO, the electrical conductivity was significant enhanced. Figure 1.9b shows
the galvanostatic charge/discharge profiles of the WS2 -NTs/rGO composite anode in
the 1st, 2nd, 10th, and 50th at a current density of 0.1 A g−1 . The WS2 -NTs/rGO com-
posite anode demonstrated high initial capacity of 996.4 mAh g−1 and it maintained at
1.4 Energy Storage Applications of Graphene Oxide 11
GO-CH4
Intensity / a.u.
GO-O2
GO-N2
1 μm GO
8 16 24 32 40
2 Theta / °
(a) (b)
60
Specific capacitance / F g–1
200
GO-N2
45 GO-O2
100 –Z'' / ohm GO-CH4
GO-N2
GO-O2
0 30
GO-CH4
–100
15
–200
0
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 0 15 30 45 60
Potential / V Z' / ohm
(c) (d)
Figure 1.8 (a) TEM image of GO-CH4. (b) XRD patterns of GO and other compared samples processed
by different gas plasma. (c) CV curves and (d) Nyquist plots of three samples using different plasma
gases O2 , N2 , and CH4 . Source: Reprinted with permission from ref. [12] Copyright 2017 Elsevier.
318.6 mA g−1 over 500 cycles at a current density of 1 A g−1 . The batteries based on the
WS2 -NTs/rGO composite anode also showed excellent rate performances (Figure 1.9c).
Composite materials such as graphene oxide/Fe2 O3 [30], Si nanoparticle/rGO [31],
SnS2 -rGO [32] demonstrated excellent performances when served as the anode for
lithium-ion batteries. The introduction of inorganic materials significantly booted the
discharge and charge capacities (over 1000 mAh g−1 ) with good cycling performance
and rate capability.
Lithium-sulphur batteries are one of the most promising battery technologies towards
commercialization. However, this battery experiment suffered from a few issues, includ-
ing rapid capacity degradation, short life span, low efficiency, and safety concerns. Wang
et al. prepared the amino-functionalized rGO [33] used is for the lithium-sulphur batter-
ies. The covalent chemical bond in the functionalized GO strongly stabilized the sulphur
and its discharge products, thus a stable capacity retention of 80% for 350 cycles with
high capacities and excellent high-rate response up to 4C were achieved. Huang et al.
used ultra-thin graphene oxide (GO) membrane to stabilize the lithium− sulfur batter-
ies [34], by using the oxygen electronegative atoms carboxyl groups in the GO as the
ion-hopping sites. The cyclic capacity decay rate was successfully reduced from 0.49%
per cycle to 0.23% per cycle.
12 1 Graphene Oxide for Electronics
Mixing Hydrothermal
reaction
(a)
3.0 3.0
1200 3.0
WS2-NTs WS2-NT/GS composite
2.5 2.5
Voltage vs. Li / Li / V
WS2-NTs/GS
2.5
Voltage vs. Li+ / Li / V
2.0 2.0
WS2-NTs
1000
0.5
0.5
800 0.0
0.0 0.1 Ag–1 0 200 400 600 800
1.5 0 200 400 600
Sepecific Capacity (mAh g–1)
800
Sepecific Capacity (mAh g1)
0.2 Ag–1
600 0.5 Ag–1
1.0 50th,10th,2nd,1st 0.1 Ag–1
1 Ag–1
WS2-NTs/GS composite
Current Density:100 mA g–1 400
0.5
0.0 200
0 250 500 750 1000 1250 0 10 20 30 40 50
Sepecific capacity (mAh g–1) Cycle Number
(b) (c)
Figure 1.9 (a) Schematic illustration of the fabrication of 1D + 2D hierarchically structure WS2 -NT/GS
composite.; (b) Discharge/charge voltage profiles of WS2 -NTs/GS composite and WS2 -NTs (inset)
anode at a current density of 100 mA/g; (c) rate capabilities of WS2 -NTs/GS composite and WS2 -NTs
anode, inset: discharge/charge voltage profiles of WS2 -NTs/GS composite at current density of 0.1, 0.2,
0.5, 1 A g−1 . Source: Reprinted with permission from ref. [29] Copyright 2014 The American Chemical
Society.
Numerous techniques for the solution deposition of graphene thin films onto transpar-
ent substrates have been demonstrated, for example, spin coating, vacuum filtration,
Langmuir–Blodgett method, and so on. In addition to differing manufacturing complex-
ity, these methods also vary in scalability, film-to-film consistency, and film properties.
Also, sheet resistance of graphene TC by solution process is higher by an order of mag-
nitude or more compared to CVD-grown films.
Liquid-phase exfoliation from natural crystalline graphite can also yield the graphene
in organic solvents with few defects [23]. Consequently, the conductivity of the graphene
films can reach a high value at the range of ∼1500–6500 S m−1 [49, 50]. Liquid-based sus-
pensions of graphene could be ideal for coatings because this would enable the relatively
low-cost methods of spin-coating [51], ink jet printing [52], and roll-to-roll process.
However, because of downstream processing, highly flammable and toxic organic sol-
vents are not desired, and as such, water is the preferred solvent. Aqueous dispersions
of pristine graphene could be prepared by sonicating graphite in the presence of surfac-
tants, such as sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate (SDBS) [53] and sodium deoxy-cholate
(SDC) [54]. This method is best suited to the scalable production of composite materi-
als and films based on graphene. However, the standard recipes are only able to produce
pristine graphene flakes with no chemical functionalities, thus limiting the performance,
including the optical electrical properties for practical applications.
Graphene-based materials are strongly affected by the way the individual sheets
are stacked. Most of the previous transparent conductive graphene films have been
limited by a trade-off between the electrical conductivity and the optical transparency,
which are controlled by the thickness of graphene in the film. Graphene/metal hybrid
is a novel class and form of graphene-based composite material. Wu et al. decorated
graphene flakes with metal nanoparticles (NPs) and effectively reduced the inter-sheet
resistance between the graphene sheets [55]. It is important to note that Au and Ag
could not be attached to graphene without functionalization. Acid treatment intro-
duces oxygen-containing chemical functional groups (such as −COOH, −OH, etc.)
and creates defects and brings chemically active sites in graphene (Figure 1.10a). This
also enables further functionalization via the initially added groups in the graphene
layers. Interestingly, silver or gold ions might become attached to carboxyl groups,
and thus the reduction takes place on the surface of the exfoliated sheets. The metal
nanoparticles (such as Au NPs and Ag NPs) decorated graphene flakes (Figure 1.10b)
showed significantly enhanced conductivity by forming the conducting points and
charge carrier bridges between the neighbouring sheets. The sheet resistance was
successfully reduced from 1 kΩ/sq to 50–100 Ω/sq at high optical transparency of
85–90% (Figure 1.10c,d). The low sheet resistance allows much more wider applications
of the graphene TCs and higher performance electronic devices, such as touch sensors,
smart windows, displays, imaging sensors, robotic hands, and so on.
Tian et al. demonstrated a novel macroscopic flexible force sensitive capacitive touch
pad by sandwiching the GO films between two layers of Teflon tape (Figure 1.11a,b)
[56]. The use of graphene and flexible Teflon allows the bending operation of the touch
sensor, the device has a notable electrical response of >5 V for 5 Hz touch frequency on
a 2-mm radius of curvature (5% stain, Figure 1.11c). The response time is about 2 ms,
in the same range of the graphene-based touch pad or rGO-based touch pad (2–3 ms).
The on/off ratio is about 60 when there no stain and had some reduction upon the stain.
1.6 Large Area Electronics Applications of Graphene Oxide 15
HNO3 AuCl–4
(a)
85
Transmittance (%)
80
75
Pristine Graphene
70 HNO3 functionalized
Graphene/AuNPs
0.2 μm
100 1000 10000 100000
Sheet Resistance (Ω / sq)
(b) (c) (d)
Figure 1.10 (a) The synthesis of oxygen functionalized graphene and the metal nanoparticle
decorated graphene. (b) The TEM images of the graphene flakes decorated by Au nanoparticles
(AuNPs). (c) an A4-size graphene transparent conductor (TC) on the flexible PET substrate by rod
coating (a roll-to-roll process). (d) The sheet resistance and optical transmittance of the graphene TC
samples produced from the pristine graphene, the nitric acid functionalized graphene and the AuNPs
decorated graphene [55].
Al membrane
Teflon tape GO touch pad 60
20 R
On/OFF Ration
Go film 50
Voltage (V)
Teflon tape 10
40
ITD film
0 30
PET substrate
–10 20
on 2mm radius of curvature 10
–20 5% strain
(a) 0
–0.6 –0.4 –0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0% 1.0% 2.5% 5.0%
Coat with Coat with Coat with Time (s) Bending strain
GO film Tellon tape membrane
(c) (d)
PET/ITO/Teflon tape
subtrate (b)
Figure 1.11 Schematic view of the flexible capacitive touch pad based on graphene oxide (GO) film.
(a) Schematic structure of the GO-based touch pad. The left inset shows the whole device curved on a
peeler. The right inset shows the flexibility of the whole device in hand. (b) Main process flow of the
GO-based touch pad. The as-prepared GO film is fixed on a PET/ITO/Teflon tape substrate. Another
layer of Teflon tape is deposited above the film. Finally, an aluminium membrane is installed above the
film. (c) The measured electrical response for 5 Hz touch frequency on a 2-mm radius of curvature. (f )
The plot of bending strain vs. ON/OFF ratio. It shows the ratio has an inverse relation with the bending
strain, which indicates that the bending strain could be estimated by the ON/OFF ratio. Source:
Reprinted with permission from ref. [56]. Copyright 2012 The Royal Society of Chemistry.
16 1 Graphene Oxide for Electronics
The on/off ratio decrease slightly upon 1% stain, reduced to 35 when the stain is 2.5%,
but could be kept higher than 20 when the strain was 5% (Figure 1.11d).
Graphene derived from graphene oxide finds many other applications for electronics,
such as sensors, heaters, electromagnetic shielding, and RF devices. To fully achieve
its potential, preparations of higher quality samples plays the most important role,
towards graphene with better electrical conductivity, higher stability, and uniformity of
graphene films. Low cost, proper processing methods will be also important to pattern
the graphene, or stacking the layered graphene towards multilayers, or compositing
with other materials for multifunctional purposes.
References
1 Novoselov, K.S., Geim, A.K., Morozov, S.V. et al. (2004). Electric field effect in atom-
ically thin carbon films. Science 306 (5696): 666–669.
2 Hummers, W.S. and Offeman, R.E. (1958). Preparation of graphitic oxide. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 80 (6): 1339.
3 Priyadarsini, S., Mohanty, S., Mukherjee, S. et al. (2018). Graphene and graphene
oxide as nanomaterials for medicine and biology application. J. Nanostruc. Chem. 8
(2): 123–137.
4 Park, S. and Ruoff, R.S. (2009). Chemical methods for the production of graphenes.
Nat. Nanotechnol. 4 (4): 217.
5 Stankovich, S., Dikin, D.A., Piner, R.D. et al. (2007). Synthesis of graphene-based
nanosheets via chemical reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide. Carbon 45 (7):
1558–1565.
6 Zhu, Y., Murali, S., Stoller, M.D. et al. (2011). Carbon-based supercapacitors pro-
duced by activation of graphene. Science 332 (6037): 1537–1541.
7 Matsumoto, M., Saito, Y., Park, C. et al. (2015). Ultrahigh-throughput exfoliation
of graphite into pristine ‘single-layer’graphene using microwaves and molecularly
engineered ionic liquids. Nat. Chem. 7 (9): 730.
8 Voiry, D., Yang, J., Kupferberg, J. et al. (2016). High-quality graphene via microwave
reduction of solution-exfoliated graphene oxide. Science 353 (6306): 1413–1416.
9 Bagri, A., Mattevi, C., Acik, M. et al. (2010). Structural evolution during the reduc-
tion of chemically derived graphene oxide. Nat. Chem. 2 (7): 581–587.
10 Wang, X.-Y., Narita, A., and Müllen, K. (2017). Precision synthesis versus bulk-scale
fabrication of graphenes. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2 (1): 1–10.
11 Pang, S., Tsao, H.N., Feng, X., and Müllen, K. (2009). Patterned graphene electrodes
from solution-processed graphite oxide films for organic field-effect transistors. Adv.
Mater. 21 (34): 3488–3491.
12 Wang, K., Xu, M., Gu, Y. et al. (2017). Low-temperature plasma exfoliated n-doped
graphene for symmetrical electrode supercapacitors. Nano Energy 31: 486–494.
13 El-Kady, M.F., Strong, V., Dubin, S., and Kaner, R.B. (2012). Laser scribing of
high-performance and flexible graphene-based electrochemical capacitors. Science
335 (6074): 1326–1330.
14 Ye, R., Chyan, Y., Zhang, J. et al. (2017). Laser-induced graphene formation on wood.
Adv. Mater. 29 (37): 1702211.
References 17
15 Shao, Y., El-Kady, M.F., Wang, L.J. et al. (2015). Graphene-based materials for flexi-
ble supercapacitors. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44 (11): 3639–1365.
16 Wang, X., Zhi, L.J., and Mullen, K. (2008). Transparent, conductive graphene elec-
trodes for dye-sensitized solar cells. Nano Lett. 8 (1): 323–327.
17 Eda, G., Lin, Y.Y., Miller, S. et al. (2008). Transparent and conducting electrodes for
organic electronics from reduced graphene oxide. Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 (23): 233305.
18 Wu, Z.W., Bai, S., Xiang, J. et al. (2014). Efficient planar heterojunction per-
ovskite solar cells employing graphene oxide as hole conductor. Nanoscale 6 (18):
10505–10510.
19 Wang, J.T.W., Ball, J.M., Barea, E.M. et al. (2014). Low-temperature processed elec-
tron collection layers of Graphene/TiO2 Nanocomposites in thin film Perovskite
solar cells. Nano Lett. 14 (2): 724–730.
20 Hu, X.Z., Xu, W.C., Zhou, L. et al. (2017). Tailoring Graphene oxide-based aerogels
for efficient solar steam generation under one Sun. Adv. Mater. 29 (5): 1604031.
21 Liu, F.H., Wang, L.J., Bradley, R. et al. (2020). Graphene-carbon composites for solar
and low-voltage powered efficient interfacial evaporation. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 4 (3):
1900122.
22 Romano, M.S., Li, N., Antiohos, D. et al. (2013). Carbon nanotube - reduced
Graphene oxide composites for thermal energy harvesting applications. Adv. Mater.
25 (45): 6602–6606.
23 Valentini, L., Bon, S.B., and Kenny, J.M. (2013). Poly(methyl methacrylate)/Graphene
oxide layered films as generators for mechanical energy harvesting. ACS Appl. Mater.
Interfaces. 5 (9): 3770–3775.
24 Que, R.H., Shao, Q., Li, Q.L. et al. (2012). Flexible Nanogenerators based on
Graphene oxide films for acoustic energy harvesting. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51
(5422): 5418–5422.
25 Stoller, M.D., Park, S., Zhu, Y. et al. (2008). Graphene-based ultracapacitors. Nano
Lett. 8 (10): 3498–3502.
26 Cheng, C., Jiang, G., Garvey, C.J. et al. (2016). Ion transport in complex lay-
ered graphene-based membranes with tuneable interlayer spacing. Sci. Adv. 2 (2):
e1501272.
27 Li, Z., Gadipelli, S., Li, H. et al. (2020). Tuning the interlayer spacing of graphene
laminate films for efficient pore utilization towards compact capacitive energy stor-
age. Nat. Energy 5 (2): 160–168.
28 Yoo, E., Kim, J., Hosono, E. et al. (2008). Large reversible Li storage of graphene
nanosheet families for use in rechargeable lithium ion batteries. Nano Lett. 8 (8):
2277–2282.
29 Chen, R.J., Zhao, T., Wu, W.P. et al. (2014). Free-standing hierarchically
Sandwich-type tungsten disulfide nanotubes/Graphene anode for lithium-ion bat-
teries. Nano Lett. 14 (10): 5899–5904.
30 Zhu, X.J., Zhu, Y.W., Murali, S. et al. (2011). Nanostructured reduced Graphene
oxide/Fe2 O3 composite as a high-performance anode material for lithium ion batter-
ies. ACS Nano. 5 (4): 3333–3338.
31 Chang, J.B., Huang, X.K., Zhou, G.H. et al. (2014). Multilayered Si nanoparti-
cle/reduced Graphene oxide hybrid as a high-performance lithium-ion battery anode.
Adv. Mater. 26 (5): 758–764.
18 1 Graphene Oxide for Electronics
32 Qu, B.H., Ma, C.Z., Ji, G. et al. (2014). Layered SnS2 -reduced Graphene oxide com-
posite - a high-capacity, high-rate, and long-cycle life sodium-ion battery anode
material. Adv. Mater. 26 (23): 3854–3859.
33 Wang, Z.Y., Dong, Y.F., Li, H.J. et al. (2014). Enhancing lithium-sulphur battery
performance by strongly binding the discharge products on amino-functionalized
reduced graphene oxide. Nat. Commun. 5: 5002.
34 Huang, J.Q., Zhuang, T.Z., Zhang, Q. et al. (2015). Permselective Graphene oxide
membrane for highly stable and anti-self-discharge lithium-sulfur batteries. ACS
Nano. 9 (3): 3002–3011.
35 Wang, J., Liang, M., Fang, Y. et al. (2012). Rod-coating: towards large-area fabrication
of uniform reduced Graphene oxide films for flexible touch screens. Adv. Mater. 24
(21): 2874–2878.
36 Eda, G. and Chhowalla, M. (2010). Chemically derived Graphene oxide: towards
large-area thin-film electronics and optoelectronics. Adv. Mater. 22 (22): 2392–2415.
37 Goncalves, G., Marques, P.A.A.P., Granadeiro, C.M. et al. (2009). Surface modifica-
tion of Graphene Nanosheets with gold nanoparticles: the role of oxygen moieties at
Graphene surface on gold nucleation and growth. Chem. Mater. 21 (20): 4796–4802.
38 Obradovic, B., Kotlyar, R., Heinz, F. et al. (2006). Analysis of graphene nanoribbons
as a channel material for field-effect transistors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 88 (14): 142102.
39 Jin, M., Jeong, H.K., Yu, W.J. et al. (2009). Graphene oxide thin film field effect tran-
sistors without reduction. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 42 (13): 135109.
40 Nair, R.R., Blake, P., Grigorenko, A.N. et al. (2008). Fine structure constant defines
visual transparency of graphene. Science 320 (5881): 1308.
41 Chen, J.H., Jang, C., Xiao, S.D. et al. (2008). Intrinsic and extrinsic performance lim-
its of graphene devices on SiO2. Nat. Nanotechnol. 3 (4): 206–209.
42 De, S. and Coleman, J.N. (2010). Are there fundamental limitations on the sheet
resistance and transmittance of thin Graphene films? ACS Nano. 4 (5): 2713–2720.
43 Hecht, D.S. and Kaner, R.B. (2011). Solution-processed transparent electrodes. MRS
Bull. 36 (10): 749–755.
44 Pang, S.P., Hernandez, Y., Feng, X.L., and Mullen, K. (2011). Graphene as transparent
electrode material for organic electronics. Adv. Mater. 23 (25): 2779–2795.
45 Watcharotone, S., Dikin, D.A., Stankovich, S. et al. (2007). Graphene-silica composite
thin films as transparent conductors. Nano Lett. 7 (7): 1888–1892.
46 Sun, Z.Z., Yan, Z., Yao, J. et al. (2010). Growth of graphene from solid carbon
sources. Nature 468 (7323): 549–552.
47 Bae, S., Kim, H., Lee, Y. et al. (2010). Roll-to-roll production of 30-inch graphene
films for transparent electrodes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 5 (8): 574–578.
48 Kahng, Y.H., Lee, S., Park, W. et al. (2012). Thermal stability of multilayer graphene
films synthesized by chemical vapor deposition and stained by metallic impurities.
Nanotechnology 23 (7): 075702.
49 Hernandez, Y., Nicolosi, V., Lotya, M. et al. (2008). High-yield production of
graphene by liquid-phase exfoliation of graphite. Nat. Nanotechnol. 3 (9): 563–568.
50 Hamilton, C.E., Lomeda, J.R., Sun, Z.Z. et al. (2009). High-yield organic dispersions
of Unfunctionalized Graphene. Nano Lett. 9 (10): 3460–3462.
51 Kymakis, E., Stratakis, E., Stylianakis, M.M. et al. (2011). Spin coated graphene films
as the transparent electrode in organic photovoltaic devices. Thin Solid Films. 520
(4): 1238–1241.
References 19
52 Torrisi, F., Hasan, T., Wu, W. et al. (2012). Inkjet-printed Graphene electronics. ACS
Nano. 6 (4): 2992–3006.
53 Lotya, M., Hernandez, Y., King, P.J. et al. (2009). Liquid phase production of
Graphene by exfoliation of graphite in surfactant/water solutions. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 131 (10): 3611–3620.
54 Hasan, T., Torrisi, F., Sun, Z. et al. (2010). Solution-phase exfoliation of graphite
for ultrafast photonics. Phys. Status Solidi B Basic Solid State Phys. 247 (11-12):
2953–2957.
55 Wu, W., Hasan, T., Torrisi, F., Zelazny, M., Privitera, G., Bonaccorso, F., et al.
(2012). Gold decorated graphene flakes for large area transparent conductive films.
Graphene 2012 Conference, Brussels, Belgium (10–13 April 2012).
56 Tian, H., Yang, Y., Xie, D. et al. (2013). A novel flexible capacitive touch pad based
on graphene oxide film. Nanoscale 5 (3): 890–894.
21
282 284 286 288 290 292 Intensity (a.u.) 282 284 286 288 290 292
Binding Energy (eV) Binding Energy (eV)
G
Intensity (a.u.)
rGo
Go
Figure 2.1 (a) The chemical structure of graphene oxide and (b) restoration of graphene structure
after reduction. Source: Modified from [17]. High-resolution C (1s) XPS spectrum of (c) GO and (d) rGO
[6]. Photographs of aqueous dispersion of graphene oxide (0.5 mg ml−1 ) (e) before and (g) after
reduction [18]. (f ) Raman spectra of GO and rGO shows characteristic peaks at ∼1344.78 and
1605.95 cm−1 corresponding to D and G bands. The intensity ratio of the D to G band (ID /IG ) is
increased after reduction, from ∼0.98 for GO to up to ∼1.75 for rGO [2].
Brodie method [21], Staudenmaier method [21], Hofmann method [22], and Hummers
method [23], and also their modified and improved forms. Such methods involve the
chemical reaction of graphite with acids (HCl, H2 SO4 , and HNO3 ), which is then
followed by intercalation of alkali metals (KClO3 , KMnO4 , NaNO3 , etc.) into the
graphitic layers to break them into small pieces. The Hummers-Offeman method uses
a mixture of concentrated H2 SO4 , NaNO3 , and KMnO4 or its modified or improved
methods [24], which are the most popular. Because of the slow kinetic of the chemical
intercalation process, an electrochemical oxidation alternative has been developed
[25]. In the electrochemical oxidation, a graphite anode is subjected to several oxide
anions that can intercalate between the graphene layers and lead to exfoliation. The
electrochemical parameters and the types of ions in the electrolyte control the oxidation
level of the graphene and the number of layers of the produced materials. In general,
24 2 Flexible and Wearable Graphene-Based E-Textiles
the anions can intercalate to few nanometres deep from the graphite grain surface,
leading to huge expansion and flakes peeling off the electrode before full oxidation or
exfoliation. Using a membrane to hold the physically detached flakes as part of the
anode increases the oxygen content to almost 34%, which is the typical value for GO
produced by the Hummer process, the most widely used GO synthesis process, due to
a high yield and low processing time.
rGO has a graphene-like structure, and similar mechanical and electronic properties
to pristine graphene [26]. Though numerous efforts have been made to produce
pristine graphene-like materials via reduction of GO to rGO, only partial restoration
of graphene-like structure is possible with residual functional groups and structural
defects present [27]. However, the residual functional groups of rGO make it a desirable
material for washable and flexible wearable e-textiles applications [2, 6]. A wide range
of GO reduction methods have been reported, which could broadly be categorized into
three main processes: [15] physical (thermal), chemical, and in-situ reduction.
The thermal reduction is a relatively simple and a ‘green’ approach, and it is based
on heating the sample in an inert or reducing atmosphere at elevated temperatures.
The thermal gravimetric analysis of GO in nitrogen or Ar showed that most of the
oxygen functional groups on the surface are removed either by pyrolysis or by react-
ing with carbon from the basal plan to for carbon oxide gases. As a result, structural
damage was reported on the graphene sheets after the thermal treatments. Introduc-
ing reducing gas, such as hydrogen, improves the quality of the resulting graphene by
reducing the reaction with the carbon from the graphene sheets. In addition, the typical
temperature range for thermal reduction is between 400 and 1200 ∘ C, which makes it
difficult to apply in a liquid medium or in GO films on organic and most inorganic sub-
strates. For that reason, thermal reduction of GO prints or coatings on textile surfaces
is not suitable for wearable e-textiles applications, due to the structural degradation and
de-polymerization of textile fibres at higher temperatures [28, 29]. Furthermore, ther-
mal reduction requires specialist equipment and a particular environment to maintain
a higher temperature.
The chemical reduction of rGO is based on the chemical interaction between a reduc-
ing agent and the oxygen-containing groups of GO. The exact processes vary depending
on the reducing agent added; however, this process is, in general, cheaper than thermal
annealing due to the lessened need for specialist heating equipment, and often takes
place at temperatures around or just above room temperature. Hydrazine hydrate is
one of the most popular reducing agent for the chemical reduction of GO, however,
it is a toxic and potentially explosive material [30], and is therefore not considered to
be suitable for wearable e-textiles application. The well-known inorganic and organic
reducing agents that effectively restore GO to graphene include ascorbic acid (vita-
min C), phenyl hydrazine, sodium borohydride, glucose, hydroxylamine, hydroquinone,
pyrrole, amino acids, strongly alkaline solutions, and urea. Other wet chemical pro-
cess used a stronger reducing agent, such as metal powder, in HCl solutions and have
been reported to produce more conductive materials with a very low C/O ratio pro-
cedure [31–33]. Hybrid reduction methods that combine both thermal and chemical
reduction have been reported in the literature [34]. These methods are mimicking sim-
ilar technologies developed mainly for metal oxide reduction [35, 36]. The synergic of
2.3 Graphene-Based Wearable E-Textiles 25
strong reducing agents, such as Li or Na, with the high-temperature molten salts were
reported to remove most of the oxide groups, and even was able to recover some of pris-
tine graphene properties by healing the defects in GO [34]. Electrochemical reduction
in high-temperature molten salts allows the functionalization and doping of graphene
simultaneously with the reduction and produced materials with specific surface area as
high as 2800 m2 g−1 [37–39].
Although the reduction of GO is a popular approach, a major problem associated
with this route is that rGO aggregates in aqueous solution due to its hydrophobic
nature, especially in higher concentration. To prevent re-stacking of graphene flakes,
surface characteristics can be modified by adding the functionality to the surface
in an in-situ reduction process of GO in polymers. Such functional groups can be
added via either covalent bonding or noncovalent interactions [40, 41]. Covalent
bonds are usually achieved by atom doping or reaction with the residual functional
groups of graphene; whereas noncovalent bonds are generally formed by van der Waals
force, hydrogen bonding, electrostatic interaction, p–p stacking interactions, and
coordination bonds. When graphene’s unique electrical property and large surface area
are expected, the modification by forming noncovalent bonds is typically preferred.
They are comparatively weaker than covalent bonds but multiple noncovalent bonds
working in harmony can yield highly stable modifications. Moreover, these noncovalent
bonds are easy to achieve over the entire graphene surface. On the other hand, covalent
bonding is commonly preferred when stability and the strong mechanical properties of
modified graphene are required. In our studies we functionalized the rGO surface using
poly(styrenesulfonate) (PSS)/polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) during in-situ chemical reduction
with ascorbic acid and sodium hydrosulphite, which improved the dispersibility and
stability of the rGO in aqueous media polyvinyl alcohol (PVA). We then used those
dispersions to either coat or print textile yarns or fabrics for wearable e-textiles
applications [2, 4, 6] (Table 2.1).
Language: French
DE
H. DE BALZAC
LA
COMÉDIE HUMAINE
QUATORZIÈME VOLUME
DEUXIÈME PARTIE
ÉTUDES PHILOSOPHIQUES
PARIS.—IMPRIMERIE DE PILLET FILS AINÉ
RUE DES GRANDS-AUGUSTINS, 5.
IMP. S RAÇON
LE MARCHAND DE CURIOSITÉS.
Une barbe grise et taillée en pointe
cachait le menton de cet être bizarre.
ÉTUDES
PHILOSOPHIQUES
TOME I
La Peau de chagrin
Jésus-Christ en Flandre. — Melmoth réconcilié. — Le Chef-
d’œuvre inconnu. — La Recherche de l’absolu.
PARIS
V e AL E XA NDRE HO USSIAUX, ÉD IT EUR
RUE DU JARDINET SAINT-ANDRÉ DES ARTS, 3.
1870
ÉTUDES
P H I L OS OP H I QU E S.
LA PEAU DE CHAGRIN.
A MONSIEUR SAVARY,
MEMBRE DE L’ACADÉMIE DES SCIENCES.
LE TALISMAN.