Name: Jay-R N.

Pallega Subject: EDUC 212 FOUNDATION OF EDUCATION

Course: MAEd-Science Professor: JANE M. TAGUM - BRIONES

Activity #4
Reflective Essay on the Code of Ethics for Professional Teachers

Pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (e), Article 11, of R.A. No. 7836, otherwise known as
the Philippine Teachers Professionalization Act of 1994 and paragraph (a), section 6, P.D. No. 223, as
amended, the Board for Professional Teachers hereby adopt the Code of Ethics for Professional
Teachers.

In general, it is not ethical or fair to intentionally give a student low grades in order to manipulate
the outcome of an award or recognition. Grades should be based on a student's actual performance
and understanding of the subject matter. It is important to treat all students fairly and provide equal
opportunities for recognition and success.

In the given situation, the teacher must adhere to the Article VIII: The Teachers and Learners
of the Code of Ethics for Professional Teachers. Specifically, the teacher must anchor her behavior
on the following sections under Article VIII:
Section 1. A teacher has a right and duty to determine the academic marks and the promotions
of learners in the subject or grades he handles, provided that such determination shall be in accordance
with generally accepted procedures of evaluation and measurement. In case of any complaint, teachers
concerned shall immediately take appropriate actions, observing due process.
Section 2. A teacher shall recognize that the interest and welfare of learners are of first and
foremost concern, and shall deal justifiably and impartially with each of them.
Section 3. Under no circumstance shall a teacher be prejudiced or discriminate against a
learner.
Section 6. A teacher shall base the evaluation of the learner’s work only in merit and quality of
academic performance.
Section 8. A teacher shall not inflict corporal punishment on offending learners nor make
deductions from their scholastic ratings as a punishment for acts which are clearly not manifestation of
poor scholarship.

If Mrs. Anna Lee A. Amores has concerns about Joel's performance or believes that Leonard
deserves the highest honor award, it would be more appropriate for her to provide additional support
and guidance to Leonard, rather than intentionally undermining Joel's grades. Encouraging and
motivating students to excel based on their own merits is a more ethical and effective approach.

It is also important for Mrs. Anna Lee A. Amores to consider the potential negative impact on
Joel's self-esteem and motivation if he were to discover that his grades were intentionally lowered. This
could have long-lasting effects on his academic performance and overall well-being.

In summary, it is not right to give Joel low grades just to make Leonard the awardee. Fairness,
integrity, and equal opportunities for all students should be the guiding principles in any educational
setting.