Republic of the Philippines

COTABATO STATE UNIVERSITY

Bachelor of Public Administration
COTABATO

LETTER OF PERMISSION

Dr. Emraida C. Ali

Dean
Cotabato State University

Dear ma’am,

Good day Ma’am! The undersigned student/researcher of Cotabato

State University. Cotabato City, I would like to conduct my studies among
the selected local officials and non-local officials as part of my Thesis
entitled “LEADERSHIP EFFECTIVENESS AND PERFORMANCE OF LOCAL
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS IN MUNICIPALITY OF PARANG.”
We pray and hope that this humble request be given your outmost
consideration and approval.

Truly yours,
Quismundo, Eugene R.

Dr. Emraida C. Ali

Dean

Noted by: Approved by:

Ma’am Baina Kikay Prof. Mhd Faheem M. Aliuden, C.E PhD
Program Head Panelist Chairman

Republic of the Philippines

COTABATO STATE UNIVERSITY
Bachelor of Public Administration
 COTABATO

Dear Participant,

I the students of Cotabato State University are conducting a survey of

my thesis entitled “LEADERSHIP EFFECTIVENESS AND PERFORMANCE
OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS IN MUNICIPALITY OF PARANG.”
Please answer the questions honestly and it will be treated with outmost
confidentially.

Truly yours,
Quismundo, Eugene R.

Noted by:
Ma’am Baina Kikay
Program Head

QUESTIONNAIRE
Name: (Optional): __________________________________________________

Direction: The researcher is conducting entitled, “LEADERSHIP

EFFECTIVENESS AND PERFORMANCE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT
OFFICIALS IN MUNICIPALITY OF PARANG.” Please answer the
questionnaire honestly and without any mental reservation.
Please write the specific answer and put a check mark (√) inside the box.
Your responses will be treated with the utmost concern and confidentiality.

Part I. Respondents Demographic Profile

A. Age Group

Local Government Officials

25-30 35-40

45-50 55 above

Non-Local Government

18-24

25 above

B. Gender

Female Male

C. Civil Status

Single Married Divorce Separated

D. Educational Attainment
Elementary
 High School
1st to 2nd Year College
3rd to 4th Year College
Post College

E. Occupation ________________________________

PART II. LEADERSHIP EFFECTIVENESS AND PERFORMANCE OF LOCAL

GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS

Direction: Please rate yourself honestly by putting a check mark (√) on each
statement based on what you actually do using the following scales:
5 – Strongly Agree
4 – Agree
3 – Neutral
2 – Disagree
1 – Strongly Disagree

A. LOCAL OFFICIAL’S OUTCOMES

As a local official who is effectively leader, I was able to…

5 4 3 2 1

1. to do our duties in our municipality.

2. play a crucial role in the development
and progress of a municipality.
3. implement peace and order
to municipality.
4. facilitate work processes and
ensure smooth operations.
5. enhance health and nutrition services
for residents.

B. NON-LOCAL OUTCOMES
 As a local official who is effectively leader, I was able to…
5 4 3 2 1

1. implement policies and programs.

2. demonstrate transparently and
accountability in their roles.
3. enhance decision making during
work processes.
4. have exhibited strong leadership
skills.

5. engage with the community to

understand their needs and
concerns.