Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5 Serviceability 22
5 Serviceability 22
Bayan Salim 1
5 Serviceability
Although adequate strength is guaranteed, it is important that the following serviceability
concerns be taken into consideration:
- Service load deflections under full load may be excessively large.
- Long-term deflections due to sustained loads may cause damage.
- Tension cracks in beams may be wide enough to be visually disturbing, and in
some cases may reduce the durability of the structure.
- Other questions, such as vibration or fatigue, require consideration.
Solution:
Since h is not greater than 900 mm, no skin reinforcement is required.
Check bar spacing: estimate closely jd = d – hf /2
fs = M / [As (d – hf / 2)] = 975 (10)6 / (5100×725) = 263 MPa
(Alternatively, ACI Code permits fs = ⅔fy = 280 MPa)
s = 380 (280 / fs) – 2.5 cc ≤ 300 (280 / fs)
= 255 mm < 319 mm
Available s = (675 – 2×75)/4 = 131 mm < 255 mm OK, crack width is controlled.
(If the result had been unfavorable, redesign using smaller-diameter bars)
HW: Rectangular section with cover cc = 60 mm, h = 575 mm, d = 500 mm, b = 450
mm. Check crack control requirements for 2 No.36 tension reinforcement. If not satisfied,
specify alternative design. Take fy = 420 MPa.
RC II Ch. 5 Serviceability Prof. Dr. Bayan Salim 3
Control of Deflections
There are two approaches to control deflections:
- Setting suitable upper limits on the span-depth ratio.
- Otherwise, calculating deflections and comparing with specific limitations
imposed by codes.
For fy other than 420 MPa, the expressions in Table 9.3.1.1 shall be multiplied by
(0.4 + fy / 700).
For beams made of lightweight concrete having density wc in the range of 1450 – 1850
kg/m3 , the expressions in Table 9.3.1.1 shall be multiplied by the greater of (a) and (b):
(a) 1.65 – 0.0003 wc
(b) 1.09
Example 3: A lightweight (1700 kg/m3) SS beam with span 4.8 m, what is the
minimum depth of this beam to control deflection. Take fy = 560 MPa. The beam is not
supporting susceptible partitions.
Solution
Using Table 9.3.1.1 (The beam is not supporting susceptible partitions):
Min h = (l / 16)×(0.4 + 560/700)×(1.65 – 0.0003×1700)
= 300 (1.2)(1.14) = 411 mm, say 425 mm. [Check 1.14 > 1.09 OK]
RC II Ch. 5 Serviceability Prof. Dr. Bayan Salim 4
Similar deflection equations can be used for many other loading and span
arrangements.
It is seen from extensive studies that a deflection, occurring in a beam after the maximum
moment Ma has reached and exceeds ⅔ of the cracking moment (⅔Mcr), can be
calculated using an effective moment of inertia Ie;
Ie was developed to provide a transition between the upper and lower bounds Ig and Icr as
a function of the ratio Mcr / Ma.
That is:
The effective moment of inertia (≤ Ig) for the calculations of deflections shall be as
follows: (ACI 24.2.3.5)
Long-term Multipliers
Additional long-term deflection ∆t shall be determined by multiplying the immediate
deflection ∆i caused by sustained load considered, by the factor λ∆:
∆ t = λ∆ ∆ i
λ∆ = ξ / (1 + 50 ρ')
Where
ρ' = ratio of compression reinforcement at midspan for simple and continuous spans
and at support of cantilevers.
ξ = time-dependent factor for sustained loads, (Fig. R24.2.4.1):
RC II Ch. 5 Serviceability Prof. Dr. Bayan Salim 6
d. Permissible Deflections
Deflection computed shall not exceed limits stipulated in Table 24.2.2:
RC II Ch. 5 Serviceability Prof. Dr. Bayan Salim 7
Example 4:
The beam shown below is designed to carry calculated dead load of 24 kN/m and a
service live load of 48 kN/m. Of the total live load, 20% is sustained. The moment
diagram due to full dead and live load is shown in Fig. (c). The beam will support
nonstructural partitions that would be damaged if large deflection were to occur.
f'c = 28 MPa and fy = 420 MPa
Calculate that part of the 5-year total deflection that would adversely affect the partitions.
c.c. span = 7.9 m, and clear span = 7.6 m.
Solution:
Ec = 4700√28 = 24,870 MPa, Es = 200,000 MPa, n = Es / Ec = 8
fr = 0.62√28 = 3.28 MPa.
From Fig.(b), ‾y = 193 mm, and Ig = 1.347×1010 mm4 (check this!)
From Fig.(d), find the neutral axis location kd below the top of slab, and Icr.
Icr = b(kd)3/3 + nAs(d – kd)2 (Ans.: kd = 95 mm and Icr = 4.539×109 mm4) (Check them!)
RC II Ch. 5 Serviceability Prof. Dr. Bayan Salim 8
This ∆D+L = 7.8 mm will be considered the reference value; using it as a basis:
Time-dependent portion of D deflection:
∆D = 7.8 (24/72) ×2.00 = 5.2 mm
Sum of immediate and time-dependent portion (sustained) of L deflection:
∆0.2L = 7.8 (48/72)×0.2×(1 + 2.00) = 3.1 mm (0.2 means 20% of L is sustained)
Immediate deflection due to short-term L:
∆0.8L = 7.8 (48/72) ×0.80 = 4.2 mm (0.8 means 80% of L is not-sustained)
For comparison with Table 24.2.2, the limitation imposed by ACI Code is
l / 480 = 7900 / 480 = 16.5 mm > 12.5 mm OK.
HW: For Example 4, if 2 No.25 is provided in the compression zone, what would be the
3-year and 5-year deflections? Ans. 10.4 mm, 11.7 mm.
RC II Ch. 5 Serviceability Prof. Dr. Bayan Salim 9
Problems in Serviceability
1. A rectangular beam of width b = 375 mm effective depth d = 515 mm, and total depth
h = 575 mm spans 5.6 m between simple supports. It will carry a computed dead load of
16 kN/m including self-weight, plus a service live load of 33 kN/m. Reinforcement
consists of four evenly spaced (No. 22) bars in one row. The clear cover on the sides is 50
mm. Material strengths are fy = 420 MPa and fc’ = 28 MPa.
(a) Compute the stress in the steel at full service load.
(b) Confirm the suitability of the proposed design based on ACI Eq. for crack control.
2. An alternative design is proposed for the beam in Problem 1, using two (No. 29) Grade
520 bars to provide approximately the same steel strength as the originally proposed four
(No. 22) Grade 420 bars. Check to determine if the redesigned beam is satisfactory with
respect to cracking according to the ACI Code. What modification could you suggest that
would minimize the no. of bars to reduce cost, yet satisfy crack control requirements?
4. A beam having b = 300 mm, d = 540 mm, and h = 600 mm is reinforced with 3 (No.
36) bars. Material strengths are fy = 420 MPa and f’c = 28 MPa. It is used on an 8.5 m
simple span to carry a total service load of 35 kN/m. For this member, the sustained loads
include self-weight of the beam plus additional superimposed dead load of 7.5 kN/m,
plus 6 kN/m representing that part of the live load that acts more or less continuously.
The remaining 18 kN/m live load consists of short-duration loads,
(a) Find the increment of deflection under sustained loads due to creep.
(b) Find the additional deflection increment due to the intermittent part of the live load.
Compare with ACI Code limits from Table 24.2.2. Assume that construction details are
provided that will avoid damage to supported elements due to deflections. If ACI Code
limitations are not met, what changes would you recommend to improve the design?
5. A reinforced concrete beam is continuous over two equal 6.7 m spans, simply
supported at the two exterior supports, and fully continuous at the interior support.
Concrete dimensions are b = 250 mm, h = 550 mm and d = 490 m for both positive and
negative bending regions. Positive reinforcement in each span consists of two (No. 29)
bars, and negative reinforcement at the interior support is made up of three (No. 32) bars.
No compression steel is used. fy = 420 MPa and f’c = 28 MPa. The beam will carry a
service live load of 26 kN/m; 20 percent of this load will be sustained permanently, while
the rest is intermittent. The total service dead load is 15 kN/m including self-weight.
(a) Find the immediate deflection when the full dead load is applied.
(b) Find the long-term deflection under sustained load.
(c) Find the increment of deflection when the short-term part of the live load is applied.
Compare with ACI Code deflection limits; nonstructural elements are carried that would
be damaged by large deflections. Note that midspan deflection may be used as a close
approximation of maximum deflection.