Cell highlighted in Green Color needs to be entered by concerned teacher for each group

SUPERVISOR NAME Engr. Khalid Mehmood Session 2019

Project Title
To study the Possibility of Reuse of Waste Plastic together with Waste Cooking Oil as Partial Replacement of Bitumen
in Asphalt Mix
SR. NO CLOs Descriptions Domain Taxonomy PLO Semester Method

1 CLO-1 Analyze existing literature relevant to the project Cognitive C4 2 Project Report

2 Design a methodology to address the problem

CLO-2 Cognitive C6 3 7th Project Report
statement

3 Review existing experimental data relevant to the

CLO-3 Cognitive C5 4 Project Report/Viva
project and propose possible outcomes

4 Practice professional ethics and engineering Meetings/Lab. Interactions/Report

CLO-4 Affective A5 8
responsibilities Plagiarism

Demonstrate ability to complete the

5 CLO-5 tasks/experiments related to the project both as a Psychomotor P3 9 Lab./Project Performance
team member and in individual capacity
8th
Demonstrate the ability to effectively present and
6 CLO-6 defend a technical project using appropriate Affective A2 10 Presentation/Viva
communication skills and techniques.

Demonstrate the ability to conduct research,

7 analyze and synthesize information, and
CLO-7 Cognitive C5 11 Thesis
communicate the results effectively with proper
recommendations

S. No PLOs

FYP INPUT DATA 1 PLO 1 Engineering Knowledge

SR. NO REG NAME 2 PLO 2 Problem Analysis

1 FA19-BCV-010 Hammad Yasin 3 PLO 3 Design/Development of Solutions

4 PLO 4 Investigation
2 FA19-BCV-022 Muhammad Khalil
5 PLO 5 Modern Tools Usage
3 FA19-BCV-033 Sami Ullah Usman
6 PLO 6 The Engineers and Society
4 7 PLO 7 Environment and Sustainability

8 PLO 8 Ethics

9 PLO 9 Individual and Team Work

10 PLO 10 Communication

11 PLO 11 Project Mangement

12 PLO 12 Life Long Learning

7 PLO 7 Environment and Sustainability

8 PLO 8 Ethics

9 PLO 9 Individual and Team Work

10 PLO 10 Communication

11 PLO 11 Project Mangement

12 PLO 12 Life Long Learning

 FINAL YEAR DESIGN PROJECT AS A COMPLEX ENGINEERING PROBLEM
Please tick the relevant attribute(s) as per FYDP Project.
Note: Select the requried cell, press Alt+0252 and release the Alt key the exact symbol will appear i.e.,
ü
Range of Complex Problem Solving
Attribute Complex Problem Please Tick

Involve wide-ranging or conflicting technical, engineering and

1 Range of conflicting requirements
other issues.

Have no obvious solution and require abstract thinking,

2 Depth of analysis required
originality in analysis to formulate suitable models.

Requires research-based knowledge much of which is at, or

informed by, the forefront of the professional discipline and
3 Depth of knowledge required
which allows a fundamentals-based, first principles analytical
approach.

4 Familiarity of issues Involve infrequently encountered issues

Are outside problems encompassed by standards and codes of

5 Extent of applicable codes
practice for professional engineering.

Extent of stakeholder involvement Involve diverse groups of stakeholders with widely varying
6
and level of conflicting requirements needs.

7 Consequences Have significant consequences in a range of contexts.

Are high level problems including many component parts or

8 Interdependence
sub-problems

Range of Complex Problem Activities

Attribute Complex Activities
Involve the use of diverse resources (and for this purpose,
1 Range of resources resources include people, money, equipment, materials,
information and technologies).

Require resolution of significant problems arising from

2 Level of interaction interactions between wideranging or conflicting technical,
engineering or other issues.

Involve creative use of engineering

3 Innovation principles and research-based knowledge in novel ways.

Consequences to society and the Have significant consequences in a range of contexts,

4 environment characterized by difficulty of prediction and mitigation.

Can extend beyond previous experiences by applying principles-

5 Familiarity based approaches.
lity of Reuse of Waste Plastic together with Waste Cooking Oil as Partial Replacement of Bitumen in Aspha

Please mention the SDGs number(s) linked with FYDP.

 Rubrics for Evaluation of 7th Semester
SUPERVISOR NAME Engr. Khalid Mehmood Session 2019
Project Title To study the Possibility of Reuse of Waste Plastic together with Waste Cooking Oil as Partial Replacement of Bitumen in Asphalt Mix

Assessment of
15 CLO-1 Analyze existing literature relevant to the project
PLO-2 Marks Obtained

Sr. No. Category Marks Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4

FA19-BCV- FA19-BCV- FA19-BCV-
Project Report 0
010 022 033

Identifies and
Identifies some Identifies and
analyzes a wide range
relevant literature analyzes relevant
of relevant literature
related to the project literature related to
related to the project
but does not analyze the project in a
in a comprehensive
Does not identify or it comprehensively. comprehensive and
and insightful
analyze relevant insightful manner.
literature related to Demonstrates a
manner. 0 0 0 0
(a) Problem Analysis 15
the project. limited Demonstrates a
Demonstrates a deep
understanding of the clear understanding
understanding of the
background and of the background
background and
context of the and context of the
context of the
project. project.
project.

0-4 5-8 9-11 12-15

TOTAL 15 0 0 0 0
 Assessment of 15 CLO-2 Design a methodology to address the problem
PLO-3 statement
Marks Obtained

Sr. No. Category Marks Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4

FA19-BCV- FA19-BCV- FA19-BCV-
Project Report 0
010 022 033

Designs a
Designs a methodology
methodology to
to address the problem
address the problem
statement creatively
statement
and innovatively.
Designs a methodology comprehensively.
Does not design a
to address the problem
methodology to Considers feasibility,
statement but with The proposed
address the problem limitations, or potential
some gaps or methodology fully
statement. challenges in the
weaknesses. addresses the
proposed methodology
problem statement
Design of The proposed
The proposed with appropriate
creatively and 0 0 0 0
(a) 15 methodology is innovatively.
Methodology methodology partially approaches and
incomplete,
addresses the problem techniques.
inappropriate, or does Provides an exceptional
statement but has
not address the rationale or justification
some limitations or Considers feasibility,
problem statement. for the proposed
inadequacies. limitations, or
methodology that
potential challenges in
demonstrates a high
the proposed
level of critical thinking
methodology
and originality.
thoroughly.

0-4 5-8 9-11 12-15

TOTAL 15 0 0 0 0
 Assessment of 20 CLO-3 Review existing experimental data relevant to
PLO-4 the project and propose possible outcomes Marks Obtained

Sr. No. Category Marks Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4

Project Report/Viva FA19-BCV- FA19-BCV- FA19-BCV- 0

010 022 033

Demonstrates
creativity and
innovation in the
Reviews existing review of existing
experimental data experimental data
relevant to the and proposal of
project outcomes.
Reviews some
comprehensively
existing experimental
Does not review and coherently. Proposes outcomes
data relevant to the
existing that have the
project but with
experimental data The proposed potential to make
some gaps or
relevant to the outcomes align well significant
weaknesses.
project. with relevant contributions to the
The proposed
literature or data field and/or solve 0 0 0 0
(a) Investigation 20 The proposed with appropriate complex problems.
outcomes partially
outcomes are assumptions and
align with relevant
unsupported by limitations. Proposes outcomes
literature or data but
relevant literature that are feasible,
have some
or data. Considers practical, and
limitations or
limitations or effective, taking into
inadequacies.
potential challenges account both the
in the proposed strengths and
outcomes limitations of the
thoroughly. existing experimental
data and methods.

0-5 6-10 11-15 16-20

TOTAL 20 0 0 0 0
 Final Year Design Project
To study the Possibility of Reuse of Waste Plastic together with Waste Cooking Oil as Partial Replacement of Bitumen in Asphalt Mix
Session 2019
PLO Checking/Attainment Aggregate Checking
7th Semester
Percentage Pass/Fail

PLO-2 CLO-1

PLO-3 CLO-2

PLO-4 CLO-3

PLO-2 CLO-1

PLO-3 CLO-2

PLO-4 CLO-3
CLO-1 CLO-2 CLO-3
Sr. No Rgn # Name Marks Percentage

Total
PLO-2 PLO-3 PLO-4

15 15 20 50 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 50% 50 100 Grade

1 FA19-BCV-010Hammad Yasin 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0% 0% 0% Fail Fail Fail 0.0 0% F
2 FA19-BCV-022Muhammad Khalil 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0% 0% 0% Fail Fail Fail 0.0 0% F
3 FA19-BCV-033Sami Ullah Usman 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0% 0% 0% Fail Fail Fail 0.0 0% F
4 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0% 0% 0% Fail Fail Fail 0.0 0% F
 Rubrics for Evaluation of 8th Semester
SUPERVISOR NAME Engr. Khalid Mehmood Session 2019
Project Title To study the Possibility of Reuse of Waste Plastic together with Waste Cooking Oil as Partial Replacement of Bitumen in Asphalt Mix

Assessment of Practice professional ethics and engineering

30 CLO-4
PLO-8 responsibilities
Marks Obtained

Sr. No. Category Marks Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4

FA19-BCV- FA19-BCV- FA19-BCV-
Meetings/Lab. Interactions/Report Plagiarism 0
010 022 033

Consistently goes
Demonstrates a
Demonstrates a basic above and beyond in
good understanding
understanding of adhering to ethical
of professional
Does not professional ethics principles in project
ethics and
demonstrate an and engineering work and interactions
Ethical principles engineering
understanding of responsibilities. with others.
in project work professional ethics Attempts to adhere
responsibilities.
Demonstrates 0 0 0 0
(a) 15 Consistently adheres
and interactions and engineering to ethical principles exceptional
with others to ethical principles
responsibilities. in project work and accountability and
in project work and
interactions with responsibility for
interactions with
others. their work and
others.
actions.

0-4 5-8 9-11 12-15

Plagiarism more Plagiarism between Plagiarism between Plagiarism less than

Plagiarism of than 70 % 40-70% 20-40% 20% 0 0 0 0
(b) 15
FYDP Thesis
0-4 5-8 9-11 12-15
TOTAL 30 0 0 0 0
 Assessment of Demonstrate ability to complete the
40 CLO-5 tasks/experiments related to the project both as a
PLO-9 team member and in individual capacity Marks Obtained

Sr. No. Category Marks Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4

FA19-BCV- FA19-BCV- FA19-BCV-
Lab./Project Performance 0
010 022 033

1. The project was

1. The project was carried out by TWO 1. Consistently goes
carried out MOSTLY by members above and beyond in
ONE member contributing to the
2. The work load and project tasks or
1. The project was
2. The work load and variety on each experiments as both a
carried out ALMOST
variety on each member seem team member and
by ONE member
member does not satisfactory individual.
seem to be fair or at
2. The work
least one member has 3. Leadership role 2. Communicates
loadseems taken by
only ONE member
been assigned trivial being assumed by exceptionally well with 0 0 0 0
(a) Contribution 10 non-technical tasks each member for team members and
(e.g. writing the report) different tasks is NOT provides detailed and
3. Scheduled meetings
apparent informative updates.
minutes are Rarely
3. Scheduled meetings
recorded and the
minutes are OFTEN 4. scheduled meetings 3. Completes tasks or
efforts are scattered.
recorded and the minutes are USUALLY experiments in an
contribution of each recorded and the exceptional manner,
team members are contribution of each showing a high level of
NOT identified team members are skill and proficiency.
identified

0-2 3-5 6-7 8-10

Sample Sample with

Preparation / Sample with major Sample with minor
visible defects
moderate
imperfections
Nearly perfect sample 0 0 0 0
(b) Data collection 15 imperfections
through surveys,
literature etc.

0-4 5-8 9-11 12-15

Correct sample set- Correct sample set-up

Set-up and Incorrect sample Sample set-up with
set-up minor discrepancies
up but inaccuracies with accurate data 0 0 0 0
(c) Data/Results 15 in data extraction extraction
Extraction etc.

0-4 5-8 9-11 12-15

TOTAL 40 0 0 0 0
 Demonstrate the ability to effectively present
Assessment of 50 CLO-6 and defend a technical project using
PLO-10 appropriate communication skills and Marks Obtained
techniques.

Sr. No. Category Marks Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4

Presentation/Viva FA19-BCV- FA19-BCV- FA19-BCV- 0

010 022 033

Hold attention of
audience with the use
Display minimal eye Consistent use of
of direct eye contact,
Holds no eye contact with eye contact with
seldom looking at
contact with audience. audience.
notes.
audience. 0 0 0 0
(a) Delivery 20 Speaks with Speaks in uneven
Speaks with
Speaks low volume satisfactory vibration volume with little
fluctuation in volume
of volume infection
and emphasis in key
points

0-5 6-10 11-15 16-20

Presents the work in Presents the work in

Does not present Presents the work in
a somewhat effective an exceptional and
Content / the work effectively
and coherent
an effective and
highly engaging 0 0 0 0
(b) 20 or coherently. coherent manner.
Organization manner. manner.

0-5 6-10 11-15 16-20

Demonstrate strong
Show little or mixed Showsome
Show no interest in enthusiasum about
Depth of topic presented
feeling about the topic enthusiastic feeling
topic during entire 0 0 0 0
(c) 10 presented about topic
Knowledge presentation

0-2 3-5 6-7 8-10

TOTAL 50 0 0 0 0
 Demonstrate the ability to conduct research,
Assessment of 30 CLO-7 analyze and synthesize information, and
PLO-11 communicate the results effectively with proper Marks Obtained
recommendations

Sr. No. Category Marks Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4

FA19-BCV- FA19-BCV- FA19-BCV-
Thesis 0
010 022 033

The introduction
The introduction
The introduction contains some
The work appears contains relevant
contains little relevant information
sloppy and
relevant information about the task and
information about 0 0 0 0
(a) Content 5 unorganized the task and well
about the task need some
organized
improvement

0-1 2-3 4 5
Literature includes Literature includes
Literature includes Literature includes
less than 20% more than 70%
papers from last 5
20-49% papers from 51-69% papers from
papers from last 5 0 0 0 0
(b) Literature Survey 5 last 5 years last 5 years
years years
0-1 2-3 4 5

Is messy or poorly
Is acceptably Looks really-good in
designed. Seems Looks good in design
Problem time was not taken
attractive though it
and objectives.
sustainable 0 0 0 0
(c) 5 may be a bit messy. development
Specification to complete it.

0-1 2-3 4 5

Information is Information is Information is

Information is
gathered from non- gathered from gathered from
gathered from
Information electronic or limited electronic or
multiple electronic
multiple electronic or 0 0 0 0
(d) 5 electronic source non-electronic electronic source and
Gathering or electronic source
only source cited properly
0-1 2-3 4 5

Methodology is Methodology is Methodology is

Methodology not marginally practical reasonably practical practical and highly
suitable at all and relevant to the and relevant to the relevant to the 0 0 0 0
(e) Methodology 5
project objectives project objectives project objectives

0-1 2-3 4 5

Good and reasonable

Detail research gap
A vague research Some detail research research gap is
Conclusion gap is reached gap is reached
is reached from the
reached from the 0 0 0 0
(f) 5 evidence offered
Reached evidence offered

0-1 2-3 4 5
TOTAL 30 0 0 0 0
 Final Year Design Project
To study the Possibility of Reuse of Waste Plastic together with Waste Cooking Oil as Partial Replacement of Bitumen in Asphalt Mix
Session 2019
PLO Checking/Attainment Aggregate Checking
8th Semester
Percentage Pass/Fail

PLO-8 CLO-4

PLO-9 CLO-5

PLO-10 CLO-6

PLO-11 CLO-7
CLO-4 CLO-5 CLO-6 CLO-7 CLO-4 CLO-5 CLO-6 CLO-7
Sr. No Rgn # Name Marks Percentage

Total
PLO-8 PLO-9 PLO-10 PLO-11 PLO-8 PLO-9 PLO-10 PLO-11

30 40 50 30 150 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 50% 50% 150 100 Grade
1 FA19-BCV-010Hammad Yasin 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0% 0% 0% 0% Fail Fail Fail Fail 0.0 0% F
2 FA19-BCV-022Muhammad Khalil 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0% 0% 0% 0% Fail Fail Fail Fail 0.0 0% F
3 FA19-BCV-033Sami Ullah Usman 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0% 0% 0% 0% Fail Fail Fail Fail 0.0 0% F
4 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0% 0% 0% 0% Fail Fail Fail Fail 0.0 0% F
Code ) Final Year Design Project (FYDP)
Maximum Marks
Session 2019
Semester 8th 150
Marks List 8th Semester Project Evaluation (Final Year Design Project-FYDP)
Obtained Percent
Sr No. Project Title Registration Student Name Grade
Marks Obtained

FA19-BCV-010 Hammad Yasin 0.0 0% F

To study the Possibility of Reuse of Waste Plastic together with Waste FA19-BCV-022 Muhammad Khalil 0.0 0% F
1
Cooking Oil as Partial Replacement of Bitumen in Asphalt Mix FA19-BCV-033 Sami Ullah Usman 0.0 0% F

0 0 0.0 0% F

Grading Policy

90-100 85-89 80-84 75-79 70-74 65-69 60-64 55-59 50-54 <50

A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- D F

PLO Attainments

PLO Attainment Percentage

Registration Student Name
PLO-8 PLO-9 PLO-10 PLO-11
FA19-BCV-010 Hammad Yasin 0% 0% 0% 0%
FA19-BCV-022 Muhammad Khalil 0% 0% 0% 0%
FA19-BCV-033 Sami Ullah Usman 0% 0% 0% 0%
0 0 0% 0% 0% 0%

Internal Examiner External Examiner / Neutral Examiner

Chairman