RESEARCH PR

Name of Students:

Group:

Research Proposal Tittle:

POOR
PART EVALUATION OF CRITERIA
1 2 3

INTRODUCTION:
A Title or abstract were omitted or inappropriate
TITTLE AND ABSTRACT
given the problem, research questions, and
method.

PROBLEM STATEMENT AND

B
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY
 PROBLEM STATEMENT AND
B Statement of the problem, significance, purpose.
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY
questions/hypotheses, or definitions of
constructs and variables were omitted or
inappropriate.

C LITERATURE REVIEW
The structure of the literature review is
incomprehensible. irrelevant, or confusing.

D METHODS
The research design is inappropriate or has not
been identified and or described using standard
terminology. Limitations and assumptions are
omitted.

E LANGUAGE & GRAMMAR

Found more than 10 grammatical errors and
non-complete sentences.

F REFERENCES
Not follow the APA format and references were
not completely cited in the text. References less
than 10

TOTAL MA
SEARCH PROPOSAL RUBRIC
20%

FAIR GOOD EXCELLENT

4 5 6 7 8 9

Title and abstract are

informative, succinct, and offer
Title or abstract lacks relevance or fails to offer
Title and abstract are relevant, sufficiently specific details
appropriate details about the educational
offering details about the about the educational issue,
issue. variables, context, or methods of the
proposed research study. variables, context, and
proposed study.
proposed methods of the
study.

Identifies a relevant research
The research purpose, questions, hypotheses,
issue. Research questions are
or definitions of constructs and variables are
succinctly stated, connected to
poorly formed, ambiguous, or not logically
the research issue, and
connected to the description of the problem.
supported by the literature
Presents a significant
research problem related to
technology education or
career and technical
education. Articulates clear,
reasonable research
questions given the purpose,
design, and methods of the
proposed study.

Constructs and variables have

Connections to the literature are unclear or
debatable. The structure of the literature
review is weak; it does not identify important
ideas, constructs or variables related to the
research purpose, questions, or context.
been identified and described.
Connections are established
with the literature.
A workable structure has been
presented for presenting
relevant literature related to the
constructs and variables of the
proposed study.
Propositions are clearly
supported from the research
and theoretical literature. All
elements are mutually
supportive

The research design has been The research design has been
The research design is confusing or
identified and described in identified and described in
incomplete given the research questions and
sufficiently detailed terms. Some sufficiently detailed terms.
sampling strategy. Important limitations and
limitations and assumptions Some limitations and
assumptions have not been identified.
have been identified. assumptions have been
identified.

Minimum grammatical error No grammatical errors and

Few (5-9) grammatical errors and sentences is
(less than 5) with complete complete sentences that
complete but does not represent the study.
sentences. represent the study.

Some of the references follow APA format, Strictly follow APA format and
Follow APA format and
some are not. Some of the references were all references were cited in the
reference were cited in the text.
missing in the text. References between 10- text. References more than
References between 15-20.
15. 20.

TOTAL MARKS
 Formula =
(scale/10)*Alloca
ted marks
EXCELLENT ALLOCATED
WEIGHTAGE
MARKS MARKS GIVEN
10 (20%)
(100 MARKS)

tle and abstract are

ative, succinct, and offer
ciently specific details 10
the educational issue,
riables, context, and
posed methods of the
study.

20
 esents a significant
arch problem related to
hnology education or
20
areer and technical
ation. Articulates clear,
asonable research
ons given the purpose,
n, and methods of the
proposed study.

opositions are clearly

orted from the research 20
heoretical literature. All
ements are mutually
supportive 0

search design has been 30

tified and described in
ciently detailed terms.
ome limitations and
umptions have been
identified.

10
rammatical errors and
mplete sentences that
epresent the study.

y follow APA format and 10

rences were cited in the
References more than
20.

100 0