It aims to achieve 2 things: 1. to help the client to meet his need or solve a problem; 2. to provide him with fruitful coping experiences which he may use later as he goes through life. Mary Richmond in 1921 divided the process into 3: 1. study 2. diagnosis 3. treatment Naomi Brill in 1973 enumerated 9 steps: 1. engagement 2. assessment 3. definition of the problem 4. setting of goals 5. selection of alternative methods of intervention 6. establishment of a contract 7. action leading toward the desired goal 8. evaluation 9. continuation or termination Pincus and Minahan start with problem assessment and data collection. Helen Northen (1982) starts with assessment, which includes problem identification, data-gathering, and planning the intervention. Hepworth and Larsen divided the process into 3 phases: 1. Exploration, assessment and planning. 2. Implementation and Goal attainment 3. Termination and evaluation. The helping process in Philippine Casework follows the scientific problem-solving method, consisting of 7 steps. 1. Identification of the problem. 2. Data-gathering 3. Diagnostic Assessment 4. Planning the solution 5. Implementation 6. Evaluation 7. Termination or Continuation A.Intake - The problem bothering the client is identified during intake (also called “application,” or “admission”). - It becomes the starting point of data- gathering. - Here, the helping process is set in motion. 1. To record the preliminary identifying data about the client and his/her request. (intake sheet) 2. To identify the presenting problem. 3. To establish the client’s presumptive eligibility for assistance (if his needs can be met by the agency; if not, refer to another agency). The intake worker makes the initial exploration of the problem. On the basis of his findings he forms a tentative conclusion whether or not the agency can help. The client forms a first impression of the agency. The helping relationship may be said to start at the first interview. Once the client is determined to be eligible, data-gathering immediately follows intake. It is also called “fact-finding: - process of observation and classification of facts and data gathered. The material gathered is recorded in a professional record, the first part of which is the social or case study. Interviews with the client himself (primary source of information). Interviews with those significantly involved in his situation – his social milieu Records and documents Test and examinations Two types: A.) Initial history – for diagnosis and focus (readily obtained in the initial contact) B.) History as relieving a certain emotional or traumatic experience (within the treatment process). Observing client’s behavior – overt and external. Listening to verbal and non-verbal cues. Noticing the emotional undertones, pauses and blockings in the giving of information, evidence of pain and anxiety. The opening paragraphs of the case record constitute the case study. Should contain the 5 Ws: the Who (person), the What (problem), the Where, the When, and the Why or How – the contributory factors or How the problem came about. This constitutes the basis of the other steps the worker will undertake in the process of helping the person. This initial recording constitutes the material which will enable the worker to make a study of the case – hence the term: case study. Case Study.pptx Diagnosis is the worker’s professional opinion as to the nature of the presenting problem. It is to evaluate the client’s motivation to use help and his capacity/strengths to work on the problem, taking into account the factors that precipitated the problem. At this stage, the worker is able to identify the (a) immediate problem; the (b) underlying problem; and the (c) working problem. Immediate Problem – that which is causing the present difficulty. Underlying problem – that which tends to perpetuate the immediate problem. Working problem – factors that may stand in the way/process of treatment. Involves goal-setting, as well as setting specific objectives, and determination of strategies to be used. Plans may be: immediate, near future, or long-term. The goal provides direction to the efforts of both the client and the worker. The goal and objectives must be “SMART” S – specific M – measurable A – attainable R - realistic T – time-bound Criteria of selection of strategies and approaches for accomplishing the goal (N. Brill): 1. Maximum feasibility – greatest chance of producing the desired result. 2. Availability of resources 3. Workability- can be carried out Intervention or treatment plans should take into account the wishes of the client and the worker’s professional judgment whether they area appropriate and achievable. Despite well laid out plans, alternative courses of action may be necessary to reach the goal. These are the specific ways of accomplishing the goals and objectives, the roles and tasks that have been defined. The emphasis is on working with rather than working for the client. Two types of usual assistance: 1. Material resources 2. Therapeutic-educative experience which the client may find useful later in his life (e.g. reflective thinking, evaluation of decisions, develop social competence, more effective behavior, inculcate values). This also requires the worker’s skill in case management (i.e. the delivery of social services). Case management is seeing to it that what needs to be done is actually carried out. This requires knowledge of available resources, skill in utilizing these resources, and creation of new resources. Duration of service – this is setting a time limit to the service within which the desired change may be achievable. This is oftentimes left to the worker’s professional judgment. It is to measure the impact of the social worker’s intervention. Impact refers to the difference between the pre-intervention situation and/or behavior, and the post-intervention situation and/or behavior. Evaluation is based on the objectives set. Usually takes place after every major step in the treatment or intervention phase. It enables the worker to determine the progress and readiness of the client, the quality of service, and the client’s view of it. To see the results of what has been done so far. 2 kinds of evaluation: 1. formative evaluation 2. summative evaluation Formative or regular or periodic- review, revise, assess. Summative or terminal– to focus on the goals formulated 2 measures used in evaluation: 1. qualitative measures 2. quantitative measures Qualitative - describes the situation before and after intervention. Quantitative – uses ratings and instruments. The case maybe terminated when: 1. the goal has been achieved and service completed; 2. nothing further is to be gained by continuing; 3. the client requests termination; 4. referral has been made to another source for help; 5. change has been stabilized; the client can now manage by himself. The case maybe continued when the results of the action indicate that some progress or movement has been made but not enough to satisfy either the worker or the client. According to Hamilton: “The painful aspects of terminating relationships are diminished by the client’s own growing sense of strength, by a comforting feeling of improvement because of the channeling of activities into ego- building and enlarged social activities and interests with the realization of the worker’s continuing good will and the fact that he can return to the agency if necessary.”