a

Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Region IV-A CALABARZON
DIVISION OF GENERAL TRIAS CITY

LUIS Y FERRER JR., SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL

SOUTH SQUARE SUBD., PASONG KAWAYAN II, GEN. TRIAS, CAVITE

RESEARCH CONFERENCE 2021

“Nonstop Learning: Harnessing the Skills of SHS Students and Teachers through Research Amidst the Pandemic”
June 24-25, 2021
POSTER PRESENTATION Judging Rubric

Presenter’s Name: _____________________________________Year/Strand/Section: ________________________ Judge’s Name & Signature: _______________________________________

Category 1-3 4-6 7-9 10-12 SCORE

Abstract Unable to clearly connect abstract Somewhat able to see connection of abstract Abstract adequately presented student’s Abstract strongly represented the student’s Abstract
to research poster or presentation. to research/presentation. Abstract did not research. More information would have been research. Clearly supported topic presented and
contain sufficient information. beneficial. contained important points.
Poster Content Connection not found between Content presented was difficult to The content was adequately presented but Strong material. Well summarized. Clearly shows Poster
poster content and purpose of understand and did not sufficiently convey a support for the study, research hypothesis, or development of study or research. Material Content
study, research connection to the study, hypothesis, question(s) is somewhat general. Conclusion appears to accurately support purpose of study,
hypothesis/question(s), method, research question(s), method, conclusion, and implications were reasonable. hypothesis, or research question. Strong
conclusions, or implications. and/or implications. conclusion and implications presented.
Research Less complex research project, Less complex research project given the Complex research project, given the field. Complex research project, given the field. Purpose Research
given the field. Purpose of the field; however, purpose of the study and Purpose of the research and results were of the study was completely defined and results Complexity
Complexity study and analysis of results not results easily interpreted by the audience. difficult to interpret by the general audience. displayed in a manner interpretable by the general
Appropriate to easily interpreted by the audience. audience.
Discipline
Poster Not visually effective. Poster was acceptable but needs work to Poster was adequate but could improve Visually appealing and strongly effective Poster
improve visual appeal through better effectiveness through better use of space presentation. Easy to read. Utilized creativity in appearance /
Appearance/ utilization of fonts, colors, headings, and through font size, colors, headings, and white use of fonts, headings, colors, and white space. clarity
Clarity white space. space.
Poster Unable to understand link between Topic of research is not clear. Information Topic of the research is apparent. The Topic of research is clearly evident. Layout of Poster
information presented and topic of presented is somewhat confusing. presentation of information could use refining. poster is logical, and provides sequential Organization
Organization research. information from intro to conclusion and
references.
Judges must give a score for each category. Failure to do so may invalidate the results. Add scores in right column to obtain total score. (Maximum total of 60) PLEASE turn TOTAL
in your scores immediately after the round is completed! Thank you!

Additional Feedback:

Prepared by: Ms. Mariel Anne O. Cabrera

Adopted from WTAMU Student Research Conference (http://www.wtamu.edu › webres › File › Academics)