Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry B
, 2018.
412
SPECTRAL AND MECHANISTIC INVESTIGATION 413
Kinetic Measurements
The kinetic study were performed on a Lamda-
950, Perkin Elmer, Germany UV-Visible Spectropho-
tometer under pseudo first request condition where
[RTB] > [DPA] at 25°C, unless appeared. The reac-
tion was started by mixing the DPA to RTB solution,
which correspondingly contained all required concen-
tration of KNO3, KOH, and KIO4; and the progress of
reaction was taken by spectrophotometrically at 360 nm
by checking decrease in absorbance as a result of DPA
Fig. 1. 3D balls and sticks view of RTB. (Fig. 2). It was experimental that there is an immate-
rial interference from other species show up in the
reaction mixture at this wavelength. The pseudo-first
distilled water was utilized all throughout the experi- order rate constants, kobs, were determined from the
mental. A stock solution of RTB was set up by dissolv- log abs versus time graphs. The graphs were prompt up
ing appropriate amount of sample in double distilled to 75% completion of reaction. The rate constants
water. The required concentration of RTB was utilized were replicate to within ±5%.
from its stock solution. KNO3 and KOH were utilized
to keep up the ionic strength and alkalinity of the reac- DESCRIPTION OF THE RESULTS
tion, individually. AgNO3 solution was utilized to AND DISCUSSION
study the product effect of Ag(I). A stock solution of
IO4- was prepared by dissolving a known weight of Examination of Oxidation of Products
KIO4 in hot water and used after keeping overnight to Different set of reaction mixtures with varying con-
attain equilibrium. Its concentration was determined centrations of reactants diperiodatoargentate to RTB
iodometrically, [22] at neutral pH maintained, using in presence of [OH–] and KNO3 were kept for 6 hours
phosphate buffer. Diperiodatoargentate was synthe- in shut vessel under nitrogen environment. The rest of
sized by Ag(I) in being there of KIO4 while as the concentration of DPA was assessed by spectropho-
described somewhere else [23–25]. The complex of tometrically at 360 nm (Fig. 2). The outcomes demon-
DPA was characterized as of its UV spectra, its exhib- strate that 1 : 2 Stoichiometry as given in condition (1).
ited 3 peaks at 216, 225 and 362 nm. These spectral
N
features were the same to those revealed for diperioda-
toargentate [23]. The magnetic moment review
revealed to the composite is diamagnetic. The com- N
pound prepared was examined [26] for silver and KIO4 N
N + 2Ag(III) + 2OH−
by acidifying of the material with HCl, recovering and N
measuring the AgCl used for Ag, and titrating the iodine H
liberated when excess of KI was placed into the filtrate (1)
for periodate. The stock solution of diperiodatoargen- N
tate was used for the required concentration of diperio- O
datoargentate in the reaction system. During the stud-
ied constant concentration (1.0 × 10–4 dm–3 mol) of N
HN
KIO4 was utilized all through the experiment unless or N + Ag(I) + 2H+.
N
else avowed. In this way, the possibility of oxidation of O H H
RTB by IO4− was tried and found to there was no tre- The RTB–DPA reaction was allowed to progress
mendous interference due to periodate under expei- for 24 h under stirred conditions in alkali condition. After
mental form. The total [IO4− ] and [OH–] was calcu- completion of the reaction, water insoluble and water sol-
lated by considering the quantity present in the diperi- uble products were observed. The water insoluble prod-
odatoargentate solution and that furthermore uct was filtered, dried and the purity was checked using
included. Study runs were also done in nitrogen air to thin-layer chromatography (TLC) technique with 1 : 1
grasp the effect of dissolved oxygen on the rate of the benzene and ethanol as eluting solvent. The main reac-
reaction. No significant difference in the results was tion product was identified as 1-({3-[2-(dimethyl-
gotten under a nitrogen environment. In context of the amino)ethyl]-1H-indol-35-yl}methyl)-1,2,4-triazoli-
Absorbance
1.200
0.902
0.605
0.307
0.010
300 350 400 450 500
Wavelength, nm
keeping all other concentrations and conditions con- tions fixed. It was experimental that the rate constants
sistent. diminished with increase in [IO4] (Table 1).
Transmittance, %
58.0
54.0
50.0
46.0
42.0
38.0
34.0
30.0
26.3
4000 3600 3200 2800 2400 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000
Wavelength, nm
Fig. 3. FTIR (Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy) spectrum of product, 1-({3-[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]-1H-indol-5-yl}
methyl)-1,2,4-triazolidine-3,5-dione obtained during the oxidation of RTB by DPA.
0.25
0.4
1/kobs × 103, s
0.20
1/kobs × 103
0.3
0.15
0.2
0.10
0.05 0.1
0
0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
1/[RTB] × 103 dm3 mol–1
Fig. 4. Plots of 1/kobs versus 1/ [OH–] and 1/ [RTB] for verification of rate law 7 at 25°C.
k, of the slow step of Scheme were obtained from the involving that free radicals are most likely not included
graph of 1/kobs versus 1/[RTB] (Fig. 4). The values are in the reaction medium, which is the situation in prior
given in (Table 2). The activation parameters for the work [27–29]. Under the there examination, we have
rate determining step were acquired by the least square gotten the confirmation for the reactive species of
method for plot of logk versus 1/T and are displayed in diperiodatoargentate in basic condition. In perspec-
(Table 2). tive of the solid adaptable environment of silver third
species, considers on the kinetics of oxidation of a
Effect of Initially Added Products variety of organic and inorganic substrates have pulled
in consideration. Among the different types of
The initially added products, Ag(I) did not have
any noteworthy effect on the rate of the reaction. Ag(III), Ag(OH)4–, diperiodatoargentate, and eth-
ylenebis(biguanide), silver(III) occupied the greatest
consideration of scientists on account of their relative
Free Radical Trapping Experiment stability [30]. The stability of Ag(OH)4– is extremely
In the reaction conditions utilized for kinetic esti- touchy on the way to traces of dissolved oxygen and
mations, the redox coordination be full of 8% acrylo- different impurities in the reaction medium, and this
nitrile did not initiate polymerization of acrylonitrile, had not pulled in much consideration. Be that as it
Table 1. Effect of variation of [DPA], [RTB], and [OH–] on the rate of oxidation of RTB at 298 K
[DPA] × 105, [RTB] × 10 4, [OH] × 103, [IO4− ] × 10 4,
kobs × 103, s–1 Kcal × 103, s–1
dm–3 mol dm–3 mol dm–3 mol dm–3 mol
Variation of DPA
1.0 1.0 3.0 0.4 3.98 4.12
3.0 1.0 3.0 0.4 3.97 4.12
5.0 1.0 3.0 0.4 3.99 4.12
6.0 1.0 3.0 0.4 3.98 4.12
8.0 1.0 3.0 0.4 3.97 4.12
10.0 1.0 3.0 0.4 3.98 4.12
Variation of RTB
5.0 0.4 3.0 0.4 2.92 2.90
5.0 0.5 3.0 0.4 3.75 3.72
5.0 1.0 3.0 0.4 3.98 4.12
5.0 2.0 3.0 0.4 4.42 4.45
5.0 3.0 3.0 0.4 4.85 4.72
5.0 4.0 3.0 0.4 5.15 5.10
Variation of OH
5.0 1.0 0.6 0.4 2.86 2.88
5.0 1.0 0.8 0.4 3.54 3.56
5.0 1.0 3.0 0.4 3.96 4.12
5.0 1.0 4.0 0.4 4.35 4.36
5.0 1.0 5.0 0.4 4.86 4.85
5.0 1.0 6.0 0.4 5.14 5.10
Variation of IO4−
5.0 1.0 3.0 0.1 5.25 5.24
5.0 1.0 3.0 0.2 4.84 4.85
5.0 1.0 3.0 0.4 4.15 4.12
5.0 1.0 3.0 0.6 3.98 3.96
5.0 1.0 3.0 0.8 3.25 3.22
5.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 2.72 2.71
may, the two types of Ag(III), DPA and EBS, are sig- H4IO6− and H2I2O104−
may be ignored as the reaction
nificantly stable [20, 21, 31, 32]. DPA is utilized as a
medium is basic and little [IO4] used in the studies.
part of exceptionally basic medium, and EBS is utilized
as a part of especially acidic medium. A writing study Therefore, in the present basic medium, the primary
uncovers that the H2O soluble diperiodatoargentate has species are relied upon designate H3IO62 − and H2IO36− .
a chemical formula [Ag(IO6)2]7– with dsp2 arrangement Diperiodatoargentate may be showed as [Ag(H3IO6)2]–/
of square planar structure, like DPA complex with two [Ag(H2IO6)]3– depending on pH of the reaction
bidentate ligands, periodate to shape a planar atom. At medium. The similar speciation of periodate in alkali
the point when a similar atom is utilized as a part of was reported in lieratures [33]. Given that, the reaction
basic medium, it is probably not going to exist as
was upgraded through concentration of OH–, included
[Ag(IO6)2]7– as periodate is known to be in different
protonated frames dependent upon pH of the solution [IO4−] hindered the rate and first order reaction in con-
centration of diperiodatoargentate and partial order in
as H5IO6 and H4IO6− in pH ≤ 7; H3IO62 − and H2IO36−
[RTB], the accompanying mechanistic reaction has
4−
in pH > 7 and dimeric form, H2I2O10 in alkaline been proposed which additionally clarifies all explor-
medium with concentrated solution. Though, H5IO6, atory perceptions in Scheme 1.
K1
[Ag(H3IO6)2]− + OH− [Ag(H2IO6)(H3IO6)]2− + H2O
K2
[Ag(H2IO6)(H3IO6)]2− + 2H2O [Ag(H2IO6)(H2O)2] + [H3IO6]2−
N N K3
N + [Ag(H2IO6)(H2O)2] Complex (C)
N
H N
O
k N
Complex (C) HN
slow
N + [Ag(I) + H2IO6(H3IO6)]2−
N
O H H
fast
H+ + OH− H2 O
N N
O
N N fast N
N + [Ag(H2IO6)(H2O)2] HN
N + [Ag(I) + H2IO6(H3IO6)]2− .
N N
H O H H
Scheme 1. Detailed Scheme for the oxidation of RTB by diperiodatoargentate in basic medium.
[DPA]T [H3IO62 − ]
[DPA] f = . (3)
[H3IO62 − ] + K1[OH− ][H3IO62 − ] + K1K 2[OH− ] + K1K 2 K 3[RTB][OH− ]
Similarly, Similarly
− −
[OH ]T = [OH ] f [RTB]T = [RTB] f + [Complex (C)],
K1K 2[DPA] f [OH− ] K1K 2 K 2[RTB][DPA][OH− ]
+ K1K 2[DPA][OH ] + −
. [RTB]T = [RTB] f + 2−
.
[H3IO62 − ] [H3IO6 ]
In perspective of the low concentrations of diperioda- In perspective of the low concentrations of diperioda-
toargentate and H3IO62 − used in the experiment second toargentate, OH–, and H3IO62 − used,
and third terms may be neglected.
[RTB]T = [RTB] f . (5)
Therefore
Substituting equations (3)–(5) in equation (2) and
[OH− ]T = [OH− ] f . (4) omitting the subscripts T and f, we get,
MPA
DPA
Complex
The rate law (6) can be rearranged into the following According to equation (7), other conditions being
form (7), which is suitable for verification constant, the graphs of 1/kobs vs. l/[OH–], 1/[RTB]
and [H3I06]2– be linear as showed up in Figs. 4 and 7.
[H3IO62 − ] [H3IO62 − ] From the intercepts and slope of such plots, the reac-
1/kobs = + tion constants K1, K2, K3 and k were calculated in
K1K 2 K 3[RTB][OH− ] kK 2K 3[RTB] (7) Tables 1 and 2 respectively. On the other hand, Com-
+ 1 + 1. plex formation was demonstrated kinetically through
kK 3[RTB] k the non-zero intercept of the graph 1/kobs versus
1/[RTB] (Fig. 4) for conceivable arrangement of an
intermediate complex between the oxidant and sub-
strate, alike to the renowned Michaelis–Menten [34]
1/kobs × 103, s mechanism designed for enzyme substrate reactions.
4.0
The equilibrium constant K1 is more prominent than K2.
3.5 This might be ascribed to the more noteworthy pro-
pensity of diperiodatoargentate to experience depro-
3.0 tonation contrasted with the hydrolyzed species in
basic medium. The insignificant effect of ionic
2.5
strength(I) and dielectric constant of medium (D), on
2.0 the rate of reaction clarifies subjectively the inclusion
of neutral molecule, as found in Scheme 1.
1.5
The thermodynamic amounts for dissimilar equi-
1.0 librium steps, in Scheme 1 can be assessed as takes
0 1 2 3 4 5 after. The RTB periodate and hydrox ide ion concen-
[H3IO–2
6 ] × 10 –4
, mol dm–3
trations were changed at a variety of temperatures as
given in Table 2. A van’t Hoff plot was made for the vari-
Fig. 7. Verification of rate law 7 for ortho periodate in favor ety of K1 with temperature (logK1 versus 1/T (r > 0.9824,
of the oxidation of RTB. S < 0.1211) and the estimations of the enthalpy of reac-
tion ΔH, entropy of reaction ΔS and free energy of 4. D. J. Williamson, S. L. Shepheard, R. G. Hill, and
reaction ΔG, were calculated in Table 2. R. J. Hargreaves, Eur. J. Pharmacol. 328, 61 (1997).
A comparison of the final values with those 5. C. Chen, D. R. Lieberman, R. D. Larsen, et al., Tetra-
obtained for the slow step of the reaction confirms that hedron Lett. 35, 6981 (1994).
these values mainly refer to the rate limiting step, sup- 6. P. V. Kamlesh, A. H. Rita, A. G. Leslie, and D. E. Joan,
porting the way that the reaction before the rate deter- Drug Meta. Disp. 28, 189 (2000).
mining step is somewhat slow and includes high acti- 7. J. Chen, X. Jiangx, W. Jiang, et al., J. Chromatogr. B
vation energy [35–38]. Once more, it has been 805, 169 (2004).
accounted for [39–41] that the entropy of activation 8. J. f. Guo, A. J. Zhang, L. Zhao, et al., Biomed. Chro-
ΔS± has a tendency to be more negative for reactions of matogr. 20, 61 (2006).
an inner sphere, whereas the reactions of positive ΔS± 9. B. M. Rao, S. Sangaraju, M. Srinivasu, et al., J. Pharm.
values continue by means of an outer-sphere mecha- Biomed. Anal. 41, 1146 (2006).
nism. The obtained large negative values of ΔS± (Table 2) 10. M. Zečević, B. Jocić, L. Živanović, and A. Protić,
proposes that the inner-sphere mechanism where the Chromatography 68, 911 (2008).
exchange of an electron happening from RTB to DPA 11. S. Malini, R. Kalyan, and N. Nanda, Int. J. Pharm. Sci.
through a silver particle as a connecting ligand. Rev. Res. 25, 290 (2014).
Besides, large negative values of ΔS± show that there is 12. J. V. Shanmukhakumar, D. Ramachandran, V. S. Set-
a decreasing in the irregularity surrounded by the oxi- taluri, et al., Pharma Res. 4, 28 (2010).
dation procedure. This prompts to the arrangement of 13. G. S. Dannana and V. K. Marothu, Anal. Chem. Indian
compacted intermediate complex and such activated J. 3, 4 (2007).
complex is additional requested than the reactants 14. M. Tayyebeh, M. Somayeh, H. Mozhgan, and A. Abbas,
because of loss of degree of freedom [42, 43]. Then Mat. Sci. Eng. C 63, 637 (2016).
again, the positive value of ΔH± shows that the com-
15. I. E. Ramzia, G. M. Nashwah, and A. Heba, J. Chem.
plex formation is endothermic. Additionally, the posi- Pharm. Res. 3, 304 (2011).
tive value of ΔG± suggests enhanced formation of the
16. B. Sethuram, Some Aspects of Electron Transfer Reac-
intermediate with increasing temperature and in addi- tions Involving Organic Molecules (Allied Publ., New
tion to the non-spontaneity of the complex formation. Delhi, 2003), p. 151.
17. P. K. Jaiswal and K. L. Yadav, Talanta 17, 236 (1970).
CONCLUSION 18. P. K. Jaiswal, Analyst 1, 503 (1972).
The most interesting feature of this study is the 19. J. P. Rao, B. Sethuram, and T. N. Rao, React. Kinet.
decomposition of the silver(III) periodate complex. Catal. 29, 289 (1985).
The outcome presented at this point clearly show that 20. A. Kumar and P. Kumar, J. Phys. Org. Chem. 12, 79
the oxidizing agent, DPA was utilized as a part of a via- (1999).
ble and economical process. The main product was 21. G. P. Panigrahi and P. K. Misro, Indian J. Chem. A 15,
identified with the spot test, Fourier-transform infra- 1066 (1977).
red spectroscopy, NMR and LC-MS spectrum. The 22. G. L. Cohen and G. Atkinson, Inorg. Chem. 3, 1741
dynamic types of DPA was observed chosen (1964).
[Ag(H2IO6)(H3IO6)]2–. The stoichiometry of the reac- 23. V. Tegginmath, C. V. Hiremath, and S. T. Nandibe-
tion was found to be 1 : 2. The results demonstrate to woor, J. Phys. Org. Chem. 20, 55 (2007).
the part of pH in the reaction system is critical. An 24. R. R. Hosamania, N. P. Shettiaand, and S. T. Nan-
overall mechanism sequence is proposed and the rate dibewoor, J. Phys. Org. Chem. 22, 234 (2009).
law is derived. 25. G. H. Jeffery, J. Bassett, J. Mendham, and R. C. Den-
ney, Vogel’s Text Book of Quantitative Chemical Analysis,
5th ed. (Longmans, Singapore, 1996), Vol. 391, p. 467.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
26. I. M. Kolthoff, E. J. Meehan, and E. M. Carr, J. Am.
Center of Excellence for Advanced Materials and Chem. Soc. 75, 1439 (1953).
Chemistry Department, King Abdulaziz University, 27. A. A. P. Khan, A. Khan, A. M. Asiri, and S. A. Khan,
Jeddah, Saudi Arabia is highly acknowledged. J. Mol. Liq. 218, 604 (2016).
28. A. A. P. Khan, A. M. Asiri, A. Khan, and M. A. Rub,
J. Tai. Inst. Chem. Eng. 1, 127 (2014).
REFERENCES
29. L. J. Krishenbaum and L. Mrozowski, Inorg. Chem.
1. P. Goadsby, C. N. S. Drugs 10, 271 (1998). 17, 3718 (1978).
2. S. Gori, N. Slorelli, G. Bellini, et al., Brain Res. Bull. 30. P. K. Jaiswal and K. L. Yadav, Talanta 17, 236 (1970).
65, 297 (2005). 31. P. Kumar, J. Phys. Org. Chem. 12, 79 (1999).
3. A. D. Oldman, L. A. Smith, H. J. McQuay, and 32. D. C. Bilehal, R. M. Kulkarni, and S. T. Nandibewoor,
R. A. Moore, Pain 97, 247 (2002). Inorg. React. Mech. 4, 103 (2002).
33. L. Michaelis and M. L. Menten, Biochem. Z. 49, 333 39. A. A. P. Khan, A. M. Asiri, A. Khan, and M. A. Rub,
(1918). J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 5, 590 (2014).
34. A. M. Asiri, A. A. P. Khan, and A. Khan, Z. Phys. 40. A. A. P. Khan, A. Khan, and A. M. Asiri, Tenside Surf.
Chem. 51, 230 (2016). Det. 53, 87 (2016).
35. K. S. Rangappa, M. P. Raghavendra, D. S. Mahadevappa, 41. A. A. P. Khan, A. Khan, A. M. Asiri, et al., Synth.
and D. Channegouda, J. Org. Chem. 63, 531 (1998). Reactiv. Inorg. Met. Org. Nano-Met. Chem. 1, 10
(2016).
36. A. M. Asiri, A. A. P. Khan, and A. Khan, J. Mol. Liq.
203, 1 (2015). 42. A. A. P. Khan, A. M. Asiri, N. Azum, M. A. Rub,
A. Khan, and A. O. AlYoubi, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 51,
37. A. A. P. Khan, A. Khan, A. M. Asiri, et al., Res. Chem. 4819 (2012).
Intermed. 40, 1703 (2014). 43. R. M. Hassan, S. M. Ibrahim, I. A. Zaafarany,
38. A. A. P. Khan, A. M. Asiri, A. Khan, et al., J. Ind. Eng. A. Fawzy, and H. D. Takagi, J. Mol. Catal. A 344, 93
Chem. 19, 595 (2013). (2011).