Professional Documents
Culture Documents
4-APPENDIXES Fundamentals Aerospace Engineering Soler 2014
4-APPENDIXES Fundamentals Aerospace Engineering Soler 2014
Appendixes
A
6-DOF Equations of Motion
Contents
A.1 Reference frames . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 354
A.2 Orientation between reference frames . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 355
A.2.1 Wind axes-Local horizon orientation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 357
A.2.2 Body axed-Wind axes orientation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 358
A.3 General equations of motion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 358
A.3.1 Dynamic relations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 358
A.3.2 Forces acting on an aircraft . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 360
A.4 Point mass model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 361
A.4.1 Dynamic relations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 361
A.4.2 Mass relations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 362
A.4.3 Kinematic relations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 362
A.4.4 Angular kinematic relations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 364
A.4.5 General differential equations system . . . . . . . . . . . . . 364
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 367
This appendix is devoted to the deduction of the 6DOF general equations of motion
of the aircraft. The reader is referred to Gómez-Tierno et al. [1] for a thorough and
comprehensive overview. Other references on mechanics of flight are, for instance, Hull [2]
and Yechout et al. [3].
353
6-DOF Equations of Motion
~CI G = a
a ~ ∧ (Ω
~Ce G + Ω ~ ∧ V~eC G ,
~ ∧ ~rO C G ) + 2Ω (A.1)
I
where the centripetal acceleration and the Coriolis acceleration are neglectable if we
~ the earth angular velocity is one revolution per day; ~r is the
consider typical values: Ω,
radius of earth plus the altitude (around 6380 [km] ); Ve~C G is the velocity of the aircraft
in flight (200-300 [m/s]). This means a ~CI G = a
~Ce G and therefore Fe can be considered
inertial reference frame.
Definition A.3 (Local Horizon Frame). A local horizon frame Fh (Oh , xh , yh , zh ) is a system
of axes centered in any point of the symmetry plane (assuming there is one) of the aircraft,
typically the center of gravity. Axes (xh , yh , zh ) are defined parallel to axes (xh , yh , zh ).
354
A.2 Orientation between reference frames
Definition A.5 (Wind Axes Frame). A wind axes frame Fw (Ow , xw , yw , zw ) is linked to the
instantaneous aerodynamic velocity of the aircraft . It is a system of axes centered in any
point of the symmetry plane (assuming there is one) of the aircraft, typically the center of
gravity. Axis xw points at each instant to the direction of the aerodynamic velocity of the
aircraft V~ . Axis zw lays in to the plane of symmetry, perpendicular to xw and pointing
down according to regular aircraft performance. Axis yb forms a right-handed thrihedral.
Definition A.6 (Euler angles). Euler angles represent three composed and finite rotations
given in a pre-establish order that move a reference frame to a given referred frame. This
is equivalent to saying that any orientation can be achieved by composing three elemental
and finite rotations (rotations around a single axis of a basis), and also equivalent to
saying that any rotation matrix can be decomposed as a product of three elemental
rotation matrices.
Remark A.2. LF I can be obtained by simply obtaining the three individual rotation matrixes
and properly multiplying them.
355
6-DOF Equations of Motion
Example A.1 (Convention 321). Given two reference systems, FI and FF , with common
origin, we want to make FI coincide with FF : first we rotate FI around axis zI an angle
δ3 , obtaining the first intermediate reference systems F1 . Second, we rotate system F1
around axis y1 an angle δ2 , obtaining the second intermediate reference system F2 . Third,
we rotate the system F2 around axis x2 an angle δ1 , obtaining the final reference system
FF .
where R3 (δ3 ) is the notation of the individual matrix of rotation of an angle δ3 around
the third axis (axis z).
~ expressed in the first intermediate reference frame F1 (Notated
Therefore, the vector A
~1 ) will be:
A
~1 = L1I A
A ~I . (A.5)
~2 = L21 A
A ~1 . (A.8)
356
A.2 Orientation between reference frames
δ3 δ2 δ1
1 0 0
LF 2 = R1 (δ1 ) = 0 cos δ1 sin δ1 . (A.10)
0 − sin δ1 cos δ1
~ F = LF 2 A
A ~2 . (A.11)
Composing:
~F = LF 2 L21 L1I A
A ~I , (A.12)
To situate the wind axis reference frame with respect to the local horizon reference frame,
the general form given in Example (A.1) is particularized for:
• FI ≡ Fh ; FF ≡ Fw ,
• δ3 ≡ χ → Yaw angle,
• δ2 ≡ γ → Flight path angle,
357
6-DOF Equations of Motion
• δ1 ≡ µ → Bank angle.
To situate the wind axis reference frame with respect to the local horizon reference frame,
the general form given in Example (A.1) is particularized for:
• FI ≡ Fw ; FF ≡ Fb ,
• δ3 ≡ −β → Sideslip angle,
• δ2 ≡ α → Angle of attack,
• δ1 = 0 .
The physic-mathematical model governing the movement of the aircraft in the atmosphere
are the so-called general equations of motion: three equations of translation and three
equations of rotation. The fundamental simplifying hypothesis is:
Hypothesis A.2. 6-DOF model: The aircraft is considered as a rigid solid with six degrees
of freedom, i.e., all dynamic effects associated to elastic deformations, to degrees of freedom
of articulated subsystems (flaps, ailerons, etc.), or to the kinetic momentum of rotating
subsystems (fans, compressors, etc ), are neglected.
The dynamic model governing the movement of the aircraft is based on two fundamental
theorems of the classical mechanics: the theorem of the quantity of movement and the
theorem of the kinetic momentum:
358
A.3 General equations of motion
d(mV~ )
F~ = , (A.16)
dt
where F~ is the resulting of the external forces, V~ is the absolute velocity of the aircraft
(respect to a inertial reference frame), m is the mass of the aircraft, and t is the time.
Remark A.3. For a conventional aircraft holds that the variation of its mass with respect
to time is sufficiently slow so that the term ṁV~ in Equation (A.16) could be neglected.
Theorem A.2. Kinematic momentum: The theorem of the kinematic momentum establishes
that:
~
~ = dh ,
G (A.17)
dt
~ ~,
h = Iω (A.18)
where G ~ is the resulting of the external momentum around the center of gravity of the
~ is the absolute kinematic momentum of the aircraft, I is the tensor of inertia,
aircraft, h
and ω~ is the absolute angular velocity of the aircraft.
where Ix , Iy , Iz are the inertial momentums around the three axes of the reference system,
and Jxy , Jxz , Jyz are the corresponding inertia products.
The resulting equations from both theorems can be projected in any reference system.
In particular, projecting them into a body-axes reference frame (also to a wind-axes
reference frame) have important advantages.
Theorem A.3. Field of velocities Given a inertial reference frame denoted by F0 and a
non-inertial reference frame F1 whose related angular velocity is given by ω
~ 01 , and given
~ it holds:
also a generic vector A,
n ∂A
~o n ∂A
~o
= ~ 01 ∧ A~1
+ω (A.20)
∂t 0 ∂t 1
The three components expressed in a body-axes reference frame of the total force, the
359
6-DOF Equations of Motion
total momentum, the absolute velocity, and the absolute angular velocity are denoted by:
F~ = (Fx , Fy , Fz )T , (A.21)
G~ = (L, M, N)T , (A.22)
V~ = (u, v, w)T , (A.23)
T
~ = (p, q, r) .
ω (A.24)
Hypothesis A.3. Forces acting on an aircraft: The external actions acting on an aircraft can
be decomposed, without loss of generality, into propulsive, aerodynamic and gravitational,
notated respectively with subindexes ((·)T , (·)A , (·)G ):
The gravitational force can be easily expressed in local horizon axes as:
0
~
(FG )h = 0 ,
(A.28)
mg
Hypothesis A.4. Constant gravity: The acceleration due to gravity in atmospheric flight of
an aircraft can be considered constant (g = 9.81[m/s2 ]), due to a small altitude of flight
when compared to the radius of earth. Therefore, the little variations of g as a function of
h are neglectable.
360
A.4 Point mass model
The three aerodynamic momentum of roll, pitch and yaw (LA , MA , NA ) can be controlled
by the pilot through the three command surfaces, ailerons, elevator and rudder, whose
deflections can be respectively notated by δa , δe , δr . Notice that such deflection have also
influence in the three components of aerodynamic force, and therefore the 6 equations are
coupled and must be solved simultaneously.
Hypothesis A.5. Point mass model: The translational equations (A.25a)-(A.25c) are
uncoupled from the rotational equations (A.25d)-(A.25f) by assuming that the airplane
rotational rates are small and that control surface deflections do not affect forces. This
leads to consider a 3 Degree Of Freedom (DOF) dynamic model that describes the point
variable-mass motion of the aircraft.
Therefore, the dynamic equations governing the translational motion of the aircraft are
uncoupled:
361
6-DOF Equations of Motion
where D is the aerodynamic drag, Q is the aerodynamic lateral force, and L is the
aerodynamic lift.
The propulsive forces, expressed in wind axes, are as follows:
T cos ε cos ν
(F~T )w = T cos ε sin ν , (A.33)
−T sin ε
where T is the thrust, ε is the thrust angle of attack, and ν is the thrust sideslip.
Hypothesis A.6. Fixed engines: We assume the aircraft is a conventional jet airplane with
fixed engines. Almost all existing aircrafts worldwide have their engines rigidly attached
to their structure.
Hypothesis A.7. Variable mass: The aircraft is modeled as variable mass particle.
The variation of mass is given by the consumed fuel during the flight:
ṁ + φ = 0. (A.34)
Hypothesis A.8. Moving Atmosphere: The atmosphere is considered moving, i.e., wind is
taken into consideration. Vertical component is neglected due its low influence. Only
kinematic effects are considered, i.e., dynamic effects of wind are also neglected due its
low influence. The wind velocity W~ can be expressed in local horizon axes as:
Wx
~
Wh = Wy (A.35)
0
Considering the earth axes reference system as a inertial system, and assuming that
earth axes are parallel to local horizon axes, the absolute velocity V~ G = V~ A + W
~ can be
362
A.4 Point mass model
Remark A.4. Notice that the absolute aerodynamic velocity V~ A expressed in a wind axes
reference frame is (V , 0, 0).
Equations (A.37a)-(A.37c) provide the movement law and the trajectory of the aircraft
can be determined.
Notice that Equation (A.37c) is usually rewritten as
Remark A.5. If one wants to model a flight over a spherical earth, since the radius of
earth is sufficiently big and the angular velocity of earth is sufficiently small, it holds that
the rotation of earth has very low influence in the centripetal acceleration and it is thus
neglectable. Therefore, the hypothesis of flat earth holds in the dynamics of an aircraft
moving over an spherical earthwith the following kinematic relations:
V cos γ cos χ + Wx
λ̇e = , (A.39a)
(R + h) cos θ
V cos γ sin χ + Wy
θ̇e = , (A.39b)
R +h
ḣe = V sin γ, (A.39c)
where λ and θ are respectively the longitude and latitude and R is the radius of earth.
363
6-DOF Equations of Motion
In what follows the three components of absolute angular velocity of the aircraft are related
with the orientation angles of the aircraft with respect to a local horizon reference system:
p
~I ≈ ω
ω ~ h = q = µ̇~iw + γ̇~j1 + χ̇ ~kh .
(A.40)
r
Projecting the unit vectors in wind axes using the appropriate transformation matrices:
p = µ̇ − χ̇ sin γ (A.41a)
q = γ̇ cos µ + χ̇ cos γ sin µ (A.41b)
r = −γ̇ sin µ + χ̇ cos γ cos µ (A.41c)
For a point mass model, the general differential equations system governing the motion of
an aircraft is stated as follows:
Hypothesis A.9. Symmetric flight: We assume the aircraft has a plane of symmetry, and
that the aircraft flies in symmetric flight, i.e., all forces act on the center of gravity and
the thrust and the aerodynamic forces lay on the plane of symmetry. This leads to non
sideslip, i.e., β = ν = 0, and non lateral aerodynamic force, i.e., Q = 0, assumptions.
Hypothesis A.10. Small thrust angle of attack: We assume the thrust angle of attack
is small ε ≪ 1, i.e., cos ε ≈ 1 and sin ε ≈ 0. For commercial aircrafts, typical
performances do not exceed ε = ±2.5[deg] (cos 2.5 = 0.999); in taking off rarely can
go up to ε = 5 − 10 [deg], but still cos 10 = 0.98.
364
A.4 Point mass model
365
References
References
[3] Yechout, T., Morris, S., and Bossert, D. (2003). Introduction to Aircraft Flight
Mechanics: Performance, Static Stability, Dynamic Stability, and Classical Feedback
Control. AIAA Education Series.
367
Index
Index
369
Index
370
Index
371
Index
372
Index
waypoints, 312
373