Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 Barth Szilagyi Tepelea EAD 6 2 2022
1 Barth Szilagyi Tepelea EAD 6 2 2022
Abstract
In this study, we propose to present data related to the results obtained after the application of a
questionnaire addressed to a number of 48 parents of children with special educational needs,
about the educational partnership between the family and the kindergarten, and it’s importance in
the recovery and the inclusion of their children in classroom.
Theoretical premises
For the child in general, but especially for the child with special educational
requirements, the family represents their first environment of development from
all points of view, social, educational, attitudinal, emotional, etc. We consider this
thematic approach to be a current one, the involvement of the family, respectively
the parents in the kindergarten-family educational partnership contributes to the
7
K. M. Barth, D.N. Szilagyi, M. Țepelea / EAD, 2022, 6(2), 7-18
___________________________________________________________________
8
K. M. Barth, D.N. Szilagyi, M. Țepelea / EAD, 2022, 6(2), 7-18
___________________________________________________________________
but also to keep them in the family and community. Furthermore, through the even
broader vision of Education for All, learning is seen as a holistic concept –
something that takes place in the family and community, but also in schools and
other educational settings. That's why family and community participation is
essential.
In the field of education, recently, the notions of "collaboration" and
"partnership" are increasingly used in the relationships established between
parents and educators, therefore, educational partnership is the form of
communication, cooperation and collaboration in support of the child , at the level
of the educational process. It assumes a unity of educational requirements, options,
decisions and actions among educational factors. The educational partnership is
carried out permanently and together with the actual educational act (Albulescu,
Catalano, & Cristea, 2019, p. 496-497).
Regarding the collaborative attitude of the parents, respectively to the
attitudinal problems in the kindergarten-family relationship, reciprocity is the
element that is often missing in Romanian schools. Collaboration is the focus of
researchers, policy makers and educators. These are largely the responsibilities of
a progress made through the understanding and development of schools, of the
family. Mutual respect is one of the requirements that ensure a good partnership
between the family and the kindergarten (Booth, & Dunn, 2009, p. 235).
Agabrian and Millea (2005, cited in Anghelache, et al., 2017, p. 325) presents
the advantages of the kindergarten-family partnership: improving parents'
educational skills; developing parent leadership skills; connecting families with
community members; providing services and support to families. In order to
achieve an effective kindergarten-family partnership, the educator can involve the
family in certain instructive-educational activities. Thus, parents must be
supported to get to know their children, identify their needs and support their
development and harmonious growth. The family-kindergarten partnership, with
all that it implies, presents advantages for all the factors involved: educators,
parents, children. Regarding the concrete forms of collaboration between the
kindergarten and the family, it must be said that they differ depending on the goal
pursued and the concrete way of achieving it.
A graphical realization of the partnership would look something like this:
9
K. M. Barth, D.N. Szilagyi, M. Țepelea / EAD, 2022, 6(2), 7-18
___________________________________________________________________
KINDERGARTEN FAMILY
CHILD
10
K. M. Barth, D.N. Szilagyi, M. Țepelea / EAD, 2022, 6(2), 7-18
___________________________________________________________________
Method
Participants
40
42
30
20
10
6 87,5% 12,5%
0
1 2
Feminin Masculin
11
K. M. Barth, D.N. Szilagyi, M. Țepelea / EAD, 2022, 6(2), 7-18
___________________________________________________________________
22
18
9
40,0%
32,7%
16,4%
4
7,3%
3,6%
2
Figure 3. Distribution of subjects according to their educational level
12
K. M. Barth, D.N. Szilagyi, M. Țepelea / EAD, 2022, 6(2), 7-18
___________________________________________________________________
52,1%
25 47,9%
23
RURAL URBAN
Instruments
The methods used during the research (descriptive study) aim to elucidate the
aspects mentioned above. For data collection, a questionnaire-based survey was
used as a method, the research tool being the questionnaire "Improving the family-
kindergarten educational partnership and the role of the family climate in the life
of the preschool child with S.E.N.", which includes a series of well-structured
questions. These in turn aim at the problem studied by us, namely, the
improvement of the family-kindergarten educational partnership and the role of
the family climate for the harmonious development of preschoolers with S.E.N.
13
K. M. Barth, D.N. Szilagyi, M. Țepelea / EAD, 2022, 6(2), 7-18
___________________________________________________________________
Item analysis
Analysis and interpretation of the results of the descriptive study carried out
with the help of the JASP program:
Item I.1 I.2 I.3 I.4 I.5 I.6 I.7 I.8 I.10 I.11 I.12 I.13 I.14 I.15
Valid 49 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48
Missing 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Mean 1.87 1.97 1.45 1.25 2.04 3.72 2.35 4.41 5.81 1.33 1.39 2.89
Median 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 4.00 2.00 5.00 7.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Mode 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 4.00 2.00 5.00 7.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Std.Deviation 0.64 0.14 0.54 0.48 0.45 0.84 1.10 1.23 1.80 0.51 0.76 1.34
Minimum 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Maximum 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 7.00 3.00 4.00 4.00
From the analysis of the data contained in the table, it can be deduced that the
highest average was obtained for the items:
- Item 11: You consider that the lack of educational success of your
child is due to: the incompetence of educators/lack of a rhythmic
assessment/lack of interest on the part of the child/the child does
not feel confident in his/her own strength/the child is not happy in
kindergarten/inconsistency in controlling the program the child by
the parents. (m= 5.813, a.s=1.796)
- Item 10: What is the reason why you spend so little time discussing
educational issues with your child? (m=4.417, a.s=1.228)
14
K. M. Barth, D.N. Szilagyi, M. Țepelea / EAD, 2022, 6(2), 7-18
___________________________________________________________________
Since results below 0.05 were obtained, we consider that the hypothesis of
the descriptive study is supported, namely, a good collaboration between the
kindergarten and the family of the child with S.E.N. determines the improvement
of the frequency of children with S.E.N. to the educational program and,
consequently, an improvement in the cognitive and social performances of
preschoolers with S.E.N.
For an easy illustration of the data, we present the following graph:
Figure 6. The mean for the items of the subscale regarding the improvement
of the family-kindergarten educational partnership and the role of the family
climate in the life of the preschool child with C.E.S.
15
K. M. Barth, D.N. Szilagyi, M. Țepelea / EAD, 2022, 6(2), 7-18
___________________________________________________________________
The last item of the questionnaire (What do you think the kindergarten should
do to improve the family-kindergarten collaboration?) was open-ended. We will
present some answers that we have divided into two categories:
I. The best answers:
- The use of all means of communication between the kindergarten and the
family, the availability of educators to be at the parents' disposal, practical
activities carried out at the kindergarten in which the parents can also
participate.
- More extracurricular activities.
- To inform the parent every time there are slippages in the child's behavior.
- To train parents in several educational activities.
- More openness to communication with parents. To communicate,
whatever happens with the parents!
- Open hours with the participation of parents.
Conclusions
16
K. M. Barth, D.N. Szilagyi, M. Țepelea / EAD, 2022, 6(2), 7-18
___________________________________________________________________
References
17
K. M. Barth, D.N. Szilagyi, M. Țepelea / EAD, 2022, 6(2), 7-18
___________________________________________________________________
Bonchiș, E., Bîrle, D., Boroș, D., Decsei-Radu, A., Dindelegan, M.C., Drugaș, I., Drugaș,
M., Roman, D., Sas, C. (2011). Familia și rolul ei în educarea copilului [The family
and its role in the education of the child]. Iași: Editura Polirom.
Booth, A., Dunn, J, F. (2009). Family-Schools Lunks. How do they affect educational
Outcomes?. New-York: Editura Routledge.
Cristea, R., Cristea, M. (1989). Personalitatea și idealul moral angajarea revoluționară
a adolescentului [Personality and moral ideal: the revolutionary engagement of
the adolescent]. București: Editura Albatros.
Cucoș, C. (2009). Psihopedagogie pentru examenele de definitivare și grade didactice-
Ediția a III-a [Psychopedagogy for final exams and didactic degrees - Third
Edition]. Iași: Editura Polirom.
Gherguț, A. (2013). Sinteze de psihopedagogie specială [Syntheses of special
psychopedagogy]. Iași: Editura Polirom.
Ministerul Educației Naționale. (2019). Curriculum pentru educație timpurie [Early
childhood education curriculum].
Peter, K., Kiss, J.F. (2013). Psihopedagogie specială aplicată [Special applied
psychopedagogy]. Oradea: Editura Universității din Oradea
Șoițu, L., Vrăsmaș, E., Păun, E.(2001). Consiliere familială [Family counseling]. Iași:
Editura Institutul European.
18