Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Curs 10 DEPI - Sa3 - Slides - en
Curs 10 DEPI - Sa3 - Slides - en
Obviously:
Z∞
(k) −1
n
(k)
o 1 (k)
ξT (t) =F XT (ω) (t) = XT (ω) exp(jωt)dω.
2π
−∞
Decision and estimation in information processing: courses nr. 10
The power spectral density
The Wiener-Hincin theorem
Linear filtering of stochastic signals
Obviously:
Z∞
(k) −1
n
(k)
o 1 (k)
ξT (t) =F XT (ω) (t) = XT (ω) exp(jωt)dω.
2π
−∞
Decision and estimation in information processing: courses nr. 10
The power spectral density
The Wiener-Hincin theorem
Linear filtering of stochastic signals
Obviously:
Z∞
(k) −1
n
(k)
o 1 (k)
ξT (t) =F XT (ω) (t) = XT (ω) exp(jωt)dω.
2π
−∞
Decision and estimation in information processing: courses nr. 10
The power spectral density
The Wiener-Hincin theorem
Linear filtering of stochastic signals
Obviously:
Z∞
(k) −1
n
(k)
o 1 (k)
ξT (t) =F XT (ω) (t) = XT (ω) exp(jωt)dω.
2π
−∞
Decision and estimation in information processing: courses nr. 10
The power spectral density
The Wiener-Hincin theorem
Linear filtering of stochastic signals
Obviously:
Z∞
(k) −1
n
(k)
o 1 (k)
ξT (t) =F XT (ω) (t) = XT (ω) exp(jωt)dω.
2π
−∞
Decision and estimation in information processing: courses nr. 10
The power spectral density
The Wiener-Hincin theorem
Linear filtering of stochastic signals
Obviously:
Z∞
(k) −1
n
(k)
o 1 (k)
ξT (t) =F XT (ω) (t) = XT (ω) exp(jωt)dω.
2π
−∞
Decision and estimation in information processing: courses nr. 10
The power spectral density
The Wiener-Hincin theorem
Linear filtering of stochastic signals
Obviously:
Z∞
(k) −1
n
(k)
o 1 (k)
ξT (t) =F XT (ω) (t) = XT (ω) exp(jωt)dω.
2π
−∞
Decision and estimation in information processing: courses nr. 10
The power spectral density
The Wiener-Hincin theorem
Linear filtering of stochastic signals
Eξ(k) Z∞
T
1 (k) 2
Pξ(k) = = XT (ω) dω.
T T 2πT
−∞
Eξ(k) Z∞
T
1 (k) 2
Pξ(k) = = XT (ω) dω.
T T 2πT
−∞
Eξ(k) Z∞
T
1 (k) 2
Pξ(k) = = XT (ω) dω.
T T 2πT
−∞
Eξ(k) Z∞
T
1 (k) 2
Pξ(k) = = XT (ω) dω.
T T 2πT
−∞
Eξ(k) Z∞
T
1 (k) 2
Pξ(k) = = XT (ω) dω.
T T 2πT
−∞
Eξ(k) Z∞
T
1 (k) 2
Pξ(k) = = XT (ω) dω.
T T 2πT
−∞
Obviously:
Z∞
1
Pξ = qξ (ω)dω
2π
−∞
Obviously:
Z∞
1
Pξ = qξ (ω)dω
2π
−∞
Obviously:
Z∞
1
Pξ = qξ (ω)dω
2π
−∞
Obviously:
Z∞
1
Pξ = qξ (ω)dω
2π
−∞
Obviously:
Z∞
1
Pξ = qξ (ω)dω
2π
−∞
Obviously:
Z∞
1
Pξ = qξ (ω)dω
2π
−∞
Obviously:
Z∞
1
Pξ = qξ (ω)dω
2π
−∞
We start from:
(k) 2
XT (ω) (k) (k)∗
XT (ω)XT (ω)
qξ (ω) = lim = lim
T →∞ T T →∞ T
But we have:
(k) R∞ (k)
XT (ω) = ξT (t1 ) exp (−jωt1 ) dt1
−∞
T
R2
= ξ (k) (t1 ) exp (−jωt1 ) dt1
− T2
T
(k)∗ R2
XT (ω) = ξ (k) (t2 ) exp (jωt2 ) dt2
− T2
We start from:
(k) 2
XT (ω) (k) (k)∗
XT (ω)XT (ω)
qξ (ω) = lim = lim
T →∞ T T →∞ T
But we have:
(k) R∞ (k)
XT (ω) = ξT (t1 ) exp (−jωt1 ) dt1
−∞
T
R2
= ξ (k) (t1 ) exp (−jωt1 ) dt1
− T2
T
(k)∗ R2
XT (ω) = ξ (k) (t2 ) exp (jωt2 ) dt2
− T2
We start from:
(k) 2
XT (ω) (k) (k)∗
XT (ω)XT (ω)
qξ (ω) = lim = lim
T →∞ T T →∞ T
But we have:
(k) R∞ (k)
XT (ω) = ξT (t1 ) exp (−jωt1 ) dt1
−∞
T
R2
= ξ (k) (t1 ) exp (−jωt1 ) dt1
− T2
T
(k)∗ R2
XT (ω) = ξ (k) (t2 ) exp (jωt2 ) dt2
− T2
We start from:
(k) 2
XT (ω) (k) (k)∗
XT (ω)XT (ω)
qξ (ω) = lim = lim
T →∞ T T →∞ T
But we have:
(k) R∞ (k)
XT (ω) = ξT (t1 ) exp (−jωt1 ) dt1
−∞
T
R2
= ξ (k) (t1 ) exp (−jωt1 ) dt1
− T2
T
(k)∗ R2
XT (ω) = ξ (k) (t2 ) exp (jωt2 ) dt2
− T2
We start from:
(k) 2
XT (ω) (k) (k)∗
XT (ω)XT (ω)
qξ (ω) = lim = lim
T →∞ T T →∞ T
But we have:
(k) R∞ (k)
XT (ω) = ξT (t1 ) exp (−jωt1 ) dt1
−∞
T
R2
= ξ (k) (t1 ) exp (−jωt1 ) dt1
− T2
T
(k)∗ R2
XT (ω) = ξ (k) (t2 ) exp (jωt2 ) dt2
− T2
We start from:
(k) 2
XT (ω) (k) (k)∗
XT (ω)XT (ω)
qξ (ω) = lim = lim
T →∞ T T →∞ T
But we have:
(k) R∞ (k)
XT (ω) = ξT (t1 ) exp (−jωt1 ) dt1
−∞
T
R2
= ξ (k) (t1 ) exp (−jωt1 ) dt1
− T2
T
(k)∗ R2
XT (ω) = ξ (k) (t2 ) exp (jωt2 ) dt2
− T2
Whence: qξ (ω) =
RR T
limT →∞ T1 −2T ξ (k) (t1 )ξ (k) (t2 ) exp (−jω(t1 − t2 )) dt1 dt2
2
1
RR T2
= limT →∞ T − T ξ (k) (t1 )ξ (k) (t2 ) exp (−jω(t1 − t2 )) dt1 dt2
2 | {z }
Rξ (t1 ,t2 )=Rξ (t1 −t2 )
T
1
RR
= limT →∞ T
2
− T2
Rξ (t1 − t2 ) exp (−jω(t1 − t2 )) dt1 dt2
We have already shown, in the context of mean ergodicity
theorem, that:
T
ZZ
2
Z T
Kξ (t1 − t2 )dt1 dt2 = (T − |τ |)Kξ (τ )dτ
− T2 T
Whence: qξ (ω) =
RR T
limT →∞ T1 −2T ξ (k) (t1 )ξ (k) (t2 ) exp (−jω(t1 − t2 )) dt1 dt2
2
1
RR T2
= limT →∞ T − T ξ (k) (t1 )ξ (k) (t2 ) exp (−jω(t1 − t2 )) dt1 dt2
2 | {z }
Rξ (t1 ,t2 )=Rξ (t1 −t2 )
T
1
RR
= limT →∞ T
2
− T2
Rξ (t1 − t2 ) exp (−jω(t1 − t2 )) dt1 dt2
We have already shown, in the context of mean ergodicity
theorem, that:
T
ZZ
2
Z T
Kξ (t1 − t2 )dt1 dt2 = (T − |τ |)Kξ (τ )dτ
− T2 T
Whence: qξ (ω) =
RR T
limT →∞ T1 −2T ξ (k) (t1 )ξ (k) (t2 ) exp (−jω(t1 − t2 )) dt1 dt2
2
1
RR T2
= limT →∞ T − T ξ (k) (t1 )ξ (k) (t2 ) exp (−jω(t1 − t2 )) dt1 dt2
2 | {z }
Rξ (t1 ,t2 )=Rξ (t1 −t2 )
T
1
RR
= limT →∞ T
2
− T2
Rξ (t1 − t2 ) exp (−jω(t1 − t2 )) dt1 dt2
We have already shown, in the context of mean ergodicity
theorem, that:
T
ZZ
2
Z T
Kξ (t1 − t2 )dt1 dt2 = (T − |τ |)Kξ (τ )dτ
− T2 T
Whence: qξ (ω) =
RR T
limT →∞ T1 −2T ξ (k) (t1 )ξ (k) (t2 ) exp (−jω(t1 − t2 )) dt1 dt2
2
1
RR T2
= limT →∞ T − T ξ (k) (t1 )ξ (k) (t2 ) exp (−jω(t1 − t2 )) dt1 dt2
2 | {z }
Rξ (t1 ,t2 )=Rξ (t1 −t2 )
T
1
RR
= limT →∞ T
2
− T2
Rξ (t1 − t2 ) exp (−jω(t1 − t2 )) dt1 dt2
We have already shown, in the context of mean ergodicity
theorem, that:
T
ZZ
2
Z T
Kξ (t1 − t2 )dt1 dt2 = (T − |τ |)Kξ (τ )dτ
− T2 T
Whence: qξ (ω) =
RR T
limT →∞ T1 −2T ξ (k) (t1 )ξ (k) (t2 ) exp (−jω(t1 − t2 )) dt1 dt2
2
1
RR T2
= limT →∞ T − T ξ (k) (t1 )ξ (k) (t2 ) exp (−jω(t1 − t2 )) dt1 dt2
2 | {z }
Rξ (t1 ,t2 )=Rξ (t1 −t2 )
T
1
RR
= limT →∞ T
2
− T2
Rξ (t1 − t2 ) exp (−jω(t1 − t2 )) dt1 dt2
We have already shown, in the context of mean ergodicity
theorem, that:
T
ZZ
2
Z T
Kξ (t1 − t2 )dt1 dt2 = (T − |τ |)Kξ (τ )dτ
− T2 T
Whence: qξ (ω) =
RR T
limT →∞ T1 −2T ξ (k) (t1 )ξ (k) (t2 ) exp (−jω(t1 − t2 )) dt1 dt2
2
1
RR T2
= limT →∞ T − T ξ (k) (t1 )ξ (k) (t2 ) exp (−jω(t1 − t2 )) dt1 dt2
2 | {z }
Rξ (t1 ,t2 )=Rξ (t1 −t2 )
T
1
RR
= limT →∞ T
2
− T2
Rξ (t1 − t2 ) exp (−jω(t1 − t2 )) dt1 dt2
We have already shown, in the context of mean ergodicity
theorem, that:
T
ZZ
2
Z T
Kξ (t1 − t2 )dt1 dt2 = (T − |τ |)Kξ (τ )dτ
− T2 T
τ
It can be noticed that 1 − T T−→ 1:
→∞
R∞
Therefore qξ (ω) = Rξ (τ ) exp(−jωτ )dτ.
−∞ Decision and estimation in information processing: courses nr. 10
The power spectral density
The Wiener-Hincin theorem
Linear filtering of stochastic signals
τ
It can be noticed that 1 − T T−→ 1:
→∞
R∞
Therefore qξ (ω) = Rξ (τ ) exp(−jωτ )dτ.
−∞ Decision and estimation in information processing: courses nr. 10
The power spectral density
The Wiener-Hincin theorem
Linear filtering of stochastic signals
τ
It can be noticed that 1 − T T−→ 1:
→∞
R∞
Therefore qξ (ω) = Rξ (τ ) exp(−jωτ )dτ.
−∞ Decision and estimation in information processing: courses nr. 10
The power spectral density
The Wiener-Hincin theorem
Linear filtering of stochastic signals
τ
It can be noticed that 1 − T T−→ 1:
→∞
R∞
Therefore qξ (ω) = Rξ (τ ) exp(−jωτ )dτ.
−∞ Decision and estimation in information processing: courses nr. 10
The power spectral density
The Wiener-Hincin theorem
Linear filtering of stochastic signals
White noise
Stationary signal ξ(t) is called white noise if:
qξ (ω) = K , ∀ω ∈ R
qξ(ω) Rξ(τ)
Kδ(τ)
ω τ
White noise
Stationary signal ξ(t) is called white noise if:
qξ (ω) = K , ∀ω ∈ R
qξ(ω) Rξ(τ)
Kδ(τ)
ω τ
White noise
Stationary signal ξ(t) is called white noise if:
qξ (ω) = K , ∀ω ∈ R
qξ(ω) Rξ(τ)
Kδ(τ)
ω τ
White noise
Stationary signal ξ(t) is called white noise if:
qξ (ω) = K , ∀ω ∈ R
qξ(ω) Rξ(τ)
Kδ(τ)
ω τ
White noise
Stationary signal ξ(t) is called white noise if:
qξ (ω) = K , ∀ω ∈ R
qξ(ω) Rξ(τ)
Kδ(τ)
ω τ
Time-invariant system:
O{x(t − t1 )} = y (t − t1 )
ax1(t−t0)+bx2(t−t0)
invariant in timp ay (t−t )+by (t−t )
1 0 2 0
Time-invariant system:
O{x(t − t1 )} = y (t − t1 )
ax1(t−t0)+bx2(t−t0)
invariant in timp ay (t−t )+by (t−t )
1 0 2 0
Time-invariant system:
O{x(t − t1 )} = y (t − t1 )
ax1(t−t0)+bx2(t−t0)
invariant in timp ay (t−t )+by (t−t )
1 0 2 0
Time-invariant system:
O{x(t − t1 )} = y (t − t1 )
ax1(t−t0)+bx2(t−t0)
invariant in timp ay (t−t )+by (t−t )
1 0 2 0
Time-invariant system:
O{x(t − t1 )} = y (t − t1 )
ax1(t−t0)+bx2(t−t0)
invariant in timp ay (t−t )+by (t−t )
1 0 2 0
h(t) = O{δ(t)}
h(t) = O{δ(t)}
h(t) = O{δ(t)}
h(t) = O{δ(t)}
h(t) = O{δ(t)}
h(t) = O{δ(t)}
X(ω)
πδ(ω+ω0) πδ(ω−ω0)
ω
−ω0 ω0
Then:
Y (ω) = H(ω)X (ω) = Aπ exp(jϕ)H(ω0 )δ(ω − ω0 ) + · · ·
+ Aπ exp(−jϕ)H(−ω0 )δ(ω + ω0 )
X(ω)
πδ(ω+ω0) πδ(ω−ω0)
ω
−ω0 ω0
Then:
Y (ω) = H(ω)X (ω) = Aπ exp(jϕ)H(ω0 )δ(ω − ω0 ) + · · ·
+ Aπ exp(−jϕ)H(−ω0 )δ(ω + ω0 )
X(ω)
πδ(ω+ω0) πδ(ω−ω0)
ω
−ω0 ω0
Then:
Y (ω) = H(ω)X (ω) = Aπ exp(jϕ)H(ω0 )δ(ω − ω0 ) + · · ·
+ Aπ exp(−jϕ)H(−ω0 )δ(ω + ω0 )
X(ω)
πδ(ω+ω0) πδ(ω−ω0)
ω
−ω0 ω0
Then:
Y (ω) = H(ω)X (ω) = Aπ exp(jϕ)H(ω0 )δ(ω − ω0 ) + · · ·
+ Aπ exp(−jϕ)H(−ω0 )δ(ω + ω0 )
X(ω)
πδ(ω+ω0) πδ(ω−ω0)
ω
−ω0 ω0
Then:
Y (ω) = H(ω)X (ω) = Aπ exp(jϕ)H(ω0 )δ(ω − ω0 ) + · · ·
+ Aπ exp(−jϕ)H(−ω0 )δ(ω + ω0 )
X(ω)
πδ(ω+ω0) πδ(ω−ω0)
ω
−ω0 ω0
Then:
Y (ω) = H(ω)X (ω) = Aπ exp(jϕ)H(ω0 )δ(ω − ω0 ) + · · ·
+ Aπ exp(−jϕ)H(−ω0 )δ(ω + ω0 )
X(ω)
πδ(ω+ω0) πδ(ω−ω0)
ω
−ω0 ω0
Then:
Y (ω) = H(ω)X (ω) = Aπ exp(jϕ)H(ω0 )δ(ω − ω0 ) + · · ·
+ Aπ exp(−jϕ)H(−ω0 )δ(ω + ω0 )
Z∞
1
x(t) = |X (ω)| cos(ωt + ϕ(ω))dω
π
0
Z∞
1
x(t) = |X (ω)| cos(ωt + ϕ(ω))dω
π
0
Z∞
1
x(t) = |X (ω)| cos(ωt + ϕ(ω))dω
π
0
Z∞
1
x(t) = |X (ω)| cos(ωt + ϕ(ω))dω
π
0
Z∞
1
x(t) = |X (ω)| cos(ωt + ϕ(ω))dω
π
0
Z∞
1
x(t) = |X (ω)| cos(ωt + ϕ(ω))dω
π
0
Obviously:
F
Rξ (τ ) −→ qξ (ω)
qη (ω) = |H(ω)|2 qξ (ω)
F −1
qη (ω) −→ Rη (τ )
Obviously:
F
Rξ (τ ) −→ qξ (ω)
qη (ω) = |H(ω)|2 qξ (ω)
F −1
qη (ω) −→ Rη (τ )
Obviously:
F
Rξ (τ ) −→ qξ (ω)
qη (ω) = |H(ω)|2 qξ (ω)
F −1
qη (ω) −→ Rη (τ )
Obviously:
F
Rξ (τ ) −→ qξ (ω)
qη (ω) = |H(ω)|2 qξ (ω)
F −1
qη (ω) −→ Rη (τ )
Obviously:
F
Rξ (τ ) −→ qξ (ω)
qη (ω) = |H(ω)|2 qξ (ω)
F −1
qη (ω) −→ Rη (τ )
Obviously:
F
Rξ (τ ) −→ qξ (ω)
qη (ω) = |H(ω)|2 qξ (ω)
F −1
qη (ω) −→ Rη (τ )
Obviously:
F
Rξ (τ ) −→ qξ (ω)
qη (ω) = |H(ω)|2 qξ (ω)
F −1
qη (ω) −→ Rη (τ )
ω
−ω0 ω0
1 if |ω| ≤ ω0
|H(ω)| =
0 otherwise
If we feed the ideal LPF with ξ(t) stationary, we have:
qξ (ω) if |ω| ≤ ω0
qη (ω) =
0 otherwise
and, respectively:
Zω0
1
Rη (τ ) = qξ (ω) exp(jωτ )dω
2π
−ω0
Decision and estimation in information processing: courses nr. 10
The power spectral density
The Wiener-Hincin theorem
Linear filtering of stochastic signals
ω
−ω0 ω0
1 if |ω| ≤ ω0
|H(ω)| =
0 otherwise
If we feed the ideal LPF with ξ(t) stationary, we have:
qξ (ω) if |ω| ≤ ω0
qη (ω) =
0 otherwise
and, respectively:
Zω0
1
Rη (τ ) = qξ (ω) exp(jωτ )dω
2π
−ω0
Decision and estimation in information processing: courses nr. 10
The power spectral density
The Wiener-Hincin theorem
Linear filtering of stochastic signals
ω
−ω0 ω0
1 if |ω| ≤ ω0
|H(ω)| =
0 otherwise
If we feed the ideal LPF with ξ(t) stationary, we have:
qξ (ω) if |ω| ≤ ω0
qη (ω) =
0 otherwise
and, respectively:
Zω0
1
Rη (τ ) = qξ (ω) exp(jωτ )dω
2π
−ω0
Decision and estimation in information processing: courses nr. 10
The power spectral density
The Wiener-Hincin theorem
Linear filtering of stochastic signals
ω
−ω0 ω0
1 if |ω| ≤ ω0
|H(ω)| =
0 otherwise
If we feed the ideal LPF with ξ(t) stationary, we have:
qξ (ω) if |ω| ≤ ω0
qη (ω) =
0 otherwise
and, respectively:
Zω0
1
Rη (τ ) = qξ (ω) exp(jωτ )dω
2π
−ω0
Decision and estimation in information processing: courses nr. 10
The power spectral density
The Wiener-Hincin theorem
Linear filtering of stochastic signals
ω
−ω0 ω0
1 if |ω| ≤ ω0
|H(ω)| =
0 otherwise
If we feed the ideal LPF with ξ(t) stationary, we have:
qξ (ω) if |ω| ≤ ω0
qη (ω) =
0 otherwise
and, respectively:
Zω0
1
Rη (τ ) = qξ (ω) exp(jωτ )dω
2π
−ω0
Decision and estimation in information processing: courses nr. 10
The power spectral density
The Wiener-Hincin theorem
Linear filtering of stochastic signals
ω
−ω0 ω0
1 if |ω| ≤ ω0
|H(ω)| =
0 otherwise
If we feed the ideal LPF with ξ(t) stationary, we have:
qξ (ω) if |ω| ≤ ω0
qη (ω) =
0 otherwise
and, respectively:
Zω0
1
Rη (τ ) = qξ (ω) exp(jωτ )dω
2π
−ω0
Decision and estimation in information processing: courses nr. 10
The power spectral density
The Wiener-Hincin theorem
Linear filtering of stochastic signals
Rη(τ)
A2Kω0/π
−π/ω π/ω
0
0
Rη(τ)
A2Kω0/π
−π/ω π/ω
0
0
−2
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2 η(t)
−2
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2 ζ(t)
−2
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
−2
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2 η(t)
−2
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2 ζ(t)
−2
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
3 3 3
2 2 2
1 1 1
η(t+1)
ξ(t+1)
ζ(t+1)
0 0 0
−1 −1 −1
−2 −2 −2
−3 −3 −3
−2 0 2 −2 0 2 −2 0 2
ξ(t) η(t) ζ(t)
3 3 3 3
2 2 2 2
1 1 1 1
η(t+1)
η(t+2)
η(t+3)
η(t+4)
0 0 0 0
−1 −1 −1 −1
−2 −2 −2 −2
−3 −3 −3 −3
−3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3
2 2 2 2
1 1 1 1
ζ(t+1)
ζ(t+2)
ζ(t+3)
ζ(t+4)
0 0 0 0
−1 −1 −1 −1
−2 −2 −2 −2
−3 −3 −3 −3
−3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3