4/10/24, 11:00 PM User report | CS 2401-01 Software Engineering 1 - AY2024-T3 | Home

Perus Asuga

Contribution
to course
Grade item Grade Range Feedback total

CS 2401-01 Software Engineering 1 - AY2024-T3

https://my.uopeople.edu/grade/report/user/index.php?id=7459 1/7
4/10/24, 11:00 PM User report | CS 2401-01 Software Engineering 1 - AY2024-T3 | Home

Contribution
to course
Grade item Grade Range Feedback total

Assignments

WORKSHOP Dear Perus,Your solution provides a structured approach to

Programming analyzing the verifiability of each non-functional requirement
Assign. Unit 2 and proposing acceptance tests where applicable. Consider
(submission) 90.00 0–90 2.25 %
incorporating citations within the text where appropriate and
ensuring consistency in formatting. Great work!So, I am
adjusting the grades from 81 to 90.Priya

WORKSHOP
Programming
Assign. Unit 2 10.00 0–10 0.25 %
(assessment)

WORKSHOP
Programming
Assign. Unit 3 89.10 0–90 2.23 %
(submission)

WORKSHOP
Programming
Assign. Unit 3 9.91 0–10 0.25 %
(assessment)

WORKSHOP
Programming
Assign. Unit 5 90.00 0–90 2.25 %
(submission)

WORKSHOP
Programming
Assign. Unit 5 9.89 0–10 0.25 %
(assessment)

WORKSHOP
Programming
Assign. Unit 6 85.80 0–90 2.15 %
(submission)

WORKSHOP
Programming
Assign. Unit 6 10.00 0–10 0.25 %
(assessment)

AGGREGATION
Assignments total
Simple weighted
mean of grades. 98.67 0–100 -
Include empty
grades.

Discussion Forum

https://my.uopeople.edu/grade/report/user/index.php?id=7459 2/7
4/10/24, 11:00 PM User report | CS 2401-01 Software Engineering 1 - AY2024-T3 | Home

Contribution
to course
Grade item Grade Range Feedback total

FORUM
Discussion
Forum Unit 1 - 0–10 0.00 %
rating

FORUM
Discussion
Forum Unit 2 10.00 0–10 1.43 %
rating

FORUM
Discussion
Forum Unit 3 9.67 0–10 1.38 %
rating

FORUM Dear Perus,

Discussion
Forum Unit 4 I appreciate your efforts into the assignment, but a more
rating elaborated response was expected.
9.00 0–10 1.29 %
Take care

Priya

FORUM
Discussion
Forum Unit 5 9.50 0–10 1.36 %
rating

FORUM
Discussion
Forum Unit 6 9.50 0–10 1.36 %
rating

FORUM
Discussion
Forum Unit 7 10.00 0–10 1.43 %
rating

AGGREGATION
Discussion Forum
total
Simple weighted 82.38 0–100 -
mean of grades.
Include empty
grades.

Learning Journal

https://my.uopeople.edu/grade/report/user/index.php?id=7459 3/7
4/10/24, 11:00 PM User report | CS 2401-01 Software Engineering 1 - AY2024-T3 | Home

Contribution
to course
Grade item Grade Range Feedback total

ASSIGNMENT Dear Perus,

Learning Journal
Unit 1 You've done a good job of reflecting on your learning
experiences and acknowledging areas for improvement, such
as not being able to participate in the discussion forum due
to unforeseen circumstances.

It's great to see that you've grasped the concepts of software

engineering

Overall, your reflection demonstrates a proactive approach to

10.00 0–10 1.25 %
learning and a genuine interest in exploring the complexities
of software engineering. By further elaborating on your
experiences, plans for application, and areas of interest, you
can enrich the depth and insight of your learning journal
entry. Keep up the good work, and I'm confident that you'll
continue to make excellent progress in the course.

Good Luck

Priya

ASSIGNMENT Dear Perus,

Learning Journal
Unit 2 Your learning journal entry provides a concise overview of
your activities, learnings, and reflections for the week. You
provide insight into how you managed your time between
family and studies, demonstrating effective time
management skills. It's good to see that you allocated
sufficient time for each task and met your deadlines.
10.00 0–10 1.25 %
You demonstrate a solid understanding of the unit's concepts
and how they apply to real-world scenarios. Keep up the good
work!

Wishes

Priya

ASSIGNMENT Dear Perus,

Learning Journal
Unit 3 Your learning journal entry provides a clear overview of your
activities, learning outcomes, and reflections for the
week. Your understanding of the requirement elicitation
phase and its importance in system development is evident.

It's commendable that you managed your time effectively to

10.00 0–10 balance both family and study commitments. Prioritizing 1.25 %
tasks and allocating sufficient time for each activity is crucial
for successful completion, and it's good to see that you were
able to navigate through your responsibilities efficiently.

Keep up the good work in managing your tasks and applying

your learning in future endeavors!

Priya

https://my.uopeople.edu/grade/report/user/index.php?id=7459 4/7
4/10/24, 11:00 PM User report | CS 2401-01 Software Engineering 1 - AY2024-T3 | Home

Contribution
to course
Grade item Grade Range Feedback total

ASSIGNMENT Dear Perus,

Learning Journal
Unit 4 The answer provides a comprehensive overview of GRASP
patterns. Each principle is explained adequately, but the
explanation lacks depth in real-world application scenarios
for each pattern. The key points are addressed but not well-
supported with examples or evidence.

The concepts of coupling and cohesion are explained in

detail, highlighting their significance in software design.
However, the example provided to illustrate these concepts
lacks depth and clarity. While the explanation is accurate, it
could benefit from a more concrete and detailed example to
better demonstrate the concepts.
7.60 0–10 0.95 %
The response provides a clear explanation of the ideal
combination of coupling and cohesion, stating that it is high
cohesion and low coupling. However, while the explanation is
accurate, it lacks depth and examples to support the
reasoning behind this choice.

The sources are relevant and credible for the topic discussed.
However, there is room for improvement in the consistent
use of sources throughout the response.

Good work!

Priya

ASSIGNMENT Dear Perus,

Learning Journal
Unit 5 Your reflection emphasizes the critical role of testing in
software development, highlighting the need for thoroughly
tested and error-free code. You effectively managed your
time between family and studies, demonstrating a
commitment to both personal and academic responsibilities.
This balance is crucial for maintaining overall well-being and
9.00 0–10 ensuring success in your academic pursuits. 1.13 %
Your learning journal entry demonstrates thoughtful
reflection and a solid understanding of the concepts covered
during the week. By applying these insights in your future
work, you are well-positioned to continue growing as a
software engineer.

Priya

https://my.uopeople.edu/grade/report/user/index.php?id=7459 5/7
4/10/24, 11:00 PM User report | CS 2401-01 Software Engineering 1 - AY2024-T3 | Home

Contribution
to course
Grade item Grade Range Feedback total

ASSIGNMENT Dear Perus,

Learning Journal
Unit 6 You provided a detailed overview of your activities for the
week. Your reflection on the self-quiz and discussion
assignment shows a critical analysis of the topics covered in
the unit.

Your acknowledgment of the value derived from engaging

10.00 0–10 with peers in discussions is commendable. Your reference to 1.25 %
additional resources for further exploration demonstrates a
commitment to deepening your understanding of the subject
matter.

Keep up the good work!

Priya

ASSIGNMENT Dear Perus,

Learning Journal
Unit 7 Your learning journal entry provides a clear overview of your
activities, learning outcomes, and reflections for the
week. Your reflection on the importance of the observer
model and the one-to-many relationship it defines is
insightful. It's great that you included a reference to the
9.00 0–10 1.13 %
source material you used for your learning.

Keep up the good work!

Priya

ASSIGNMENT Dear Perus,

Learning Journal
Unit 8 You effectively outline your activities for the week, which
included engaging with the reading assignment, completing
the self-quiz, and managing your time between family and
studies. It's important to strike a balance between personal
and academic commitments, and your ability to juggle these
responsibilities demonstrates good time management skills.

Your understanding of software reengineering and

documentation concepts is clear and well-articulated. You
10.00 0–10 demonstrate an understanding of how the ideas and 1.25 %
concepts learned can be applied in current and future
assignments, particularly in decision-making processes
related to safeguarding digital assets. It's essential to
recognize the practical implications of theoretical concepts,
and your intention to apply these learnings in real-world
scenarios is commendable.

Good luck for your future

Priya

https://my.uopeople.edu/grade/report/user/index.php?id=7459 6/7
4/10/24, 11:00 PM User report | CS 2401-01 Software Engineering 1 - AY2024-T3 | Home

Contribution
to course
Grade item Grade Range Feedback total

AGGREGATION
Learning Journal
total
Simple weighted 94.50 0–100 -
mean of grades.
Include empty
grades.

Self-quiz

QUIZ
Self-Quiz Unit 1 100.00 0–100 -

QUIZ
Self-Quiz Unit 2 100.00 0–100 -

QUIZ
Self-Quiz Unit 3 100.00 0–100 -

QUIZ
Self-Quiz Unit 4 100.00 0–100 -

QUIZ
Self-Quiz Unit 5 100.00 0–100 -

QUIZ
Self-Quiz Unit 6 100.00 0–100 -

QUIZ
Self-Quiz Unit 7 100.00 0–100 -

QUIZ
Self-Quiz Unit 8 100.00 0–100 -

QUIZ
Review Quiz 100.00 0–100 -

QUIZ
Graded Quiz Unit 4 100.00 0–100 20.00 %

QUIZ
Graded Quiz Unit 7 100.00 0–100 20.00 %

QUIZ
Final Exam 93.33 0–100 28.00 %

AGGREGATION
Course total
Weighted mean of 95.56 0–100 -
grades. Include empty
grades.

https://my.uopeople.edu/grade/report/user/index.php?id=7459 7/7