Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sun 2018
Sun 2018
Sun 2018
Microbial community evolution of black and stinking rivers during in situ re-
mediation through micro-nano bubble and submerged resin floating bed tech-
nology
PII: S0960-8524(18)30346-8
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.03.008
Reference: BITE 19647
Please cite this article as: Sun, Y., Wang, S., Niu, J., Microbial community evolution of black and stinking rivers
during in situ remediation through micro-nano bubble and submerged resin floating bed technology, Bioresource
Technology (2018), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.03.008
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers
we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and
review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process
errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Microbial community evolution of black and stinking rivers during in situ
technology
a
Research Center for Eco-Environmental Engineering, Dongguan University of
b
School of Chemical Engineering and Energy Technology, Dongguan University of
†
Equal contributions
1
ABSTRACT
Microbes play important roles during river remediation and the interaction
resin floating bed composite technology (MBSR) was firstly used to restore two black
and stinking urban rivers. After restoration, the water pollution indices such as
chemical oxygen demand (CODCr), water clarity, and the number of facial coliform
abundance both varied and more aerobic microbes emerged after remediation. The
microbial changes showed correlation with DO, NH4+-N, TP and CODCr of the rivers.
In summary, the MBSR treatment improved the physiochemical properties of the two
black and stinking urban rivers probably through oxygen enrichment of micro-nano
bubble and adsorption of submerged resin floating bed, which thereby stimulated
2
1. Introduction
impaired river health in China. The rivers especially flowing through cities were
industrial wastewater, solid waste and so on, and the number and severity of polluted
rivers both were increasing year by year in China (Noorhosseini et al., 2015; Yuan et
al., 2012). The heavily polluted rivers exhibit seasonal or perennial black and stinking
water quality adversely affects people life and poses a serious threat to human health
(Viswanathan and Schirmer, 2015). The black and stinking urban rivers have become
one of the important water environment issues and aroused widespread concern.
Recently, a great deal of financial and material resources was invested to control or
enzyme technology were used to eliminate pollutants from rivers (Haque and Kwon,
2017; Liu et al., 2016; Mi et al., 2015). These measures may be effective to remediate
light eutrophic rivers with mental or organic pollutants but not for black and stinking
urban rivers, which contain high concentration of pollutants and low dissolved oxygen
(DO). Therefore, the target repair technology is urgent to be developed for black and
Black and stinking phenomenon of urban rivers is mainly caused by organic and
inorganic pollutants with extremely high levels (Ji et al., 2017). Excessive pollutants
3
discharged into rivers, a part of them precipitated in sediment to form endogenous
pollution, and the others were degraded by aerobic microorganisms. The degradation
organic matter to produce a large amount of foul gas such as H2S, NH3 and volatile
organic sulphides and at the same time to form some black substances such as FeS,
MnS and so on. Finally, the water body shows strong reducibility, pan-black and stink
smell. The ecological structure of the black and stinking urban rivers is out of balance
and thereby they are not suitable for aquatic life due to loss of the ecological function.
reduce high-load pollutants is one key factor in the remediation process of black and
Under these circumstances the micro-nano bubble and submerged resin floating
bed composite technology was applied to restore two actual black and stinking urban
rivers. The micro-nano bubble technology has been reported to use in water treatment
(Agarwal et al., 2011; Hu and Xia, 2017). Compared to ordinary aeration, the
micro-nano bubble technology can produce smaller bubbles with diameters of several
tens of micrometers and nanometers, which have slow rising speed and high
self-pressurization and gas dissolution capability (Agarwal et al., 2011; Hu and Xia,
2017). In contrast, as far as we know, few studies have been reported to investigate
the effect of submerged resin floating bed technology on remediation of black and
stinking urban rivers. In order to increase specific surface area, in the submerged resin
4
floating bed system the polymer resins were designed to be less than 1 mm by
electrostatic spinning method and it was expected to absorb more suspended particles
and contaminants. In this study, the composite technology of micro-nano bubble and
submerged resin floating bed (MBSR) was firstly used to restore two actual black and
stinking rivers.
recalcitrant contaminants in urban rivers (Beale et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2017; Pi et al.,
2017). Microbial communities interacted with pollution sources and they showed high
sensitivity towards the altered environmental status (Abram et al., 2014; Lee et al.,
2017; Zeglin et al., 2011). Therefore, analyzing the impact of MBSR on microbial
population would help to illustrate the restoration mechanism of the black and
In this study, two black and stinking rivers were chosen to evaluate the effect of
evolution, the correlation between microbial community and pollutants removal, and
investigated. This study provided more understanding about the ecological effects of
5
2. Materials and methods
and River B (N22°47′45″, E113°46′55″)) of this study flow through urbanized region
of the southern China. The full length of River A was 462 m, and the sewage drained
directly into River A through municipal sewage mixing system and then flowed into
closed-channel. The water quality of River B was affected by tidal water of the
adjacent river and displayed some fluctuation every day. The flow rates of River A
and B were 0.2~0.3 m/s and ~0.1 m/s, respectively, and the temperature was both 25
± 2°C for the two rivers. The surrounding environment of the two rivers was
complicated and there are a lot of residents and factories. The two rivers were
throughout its course for a long time, which caused serious water quality deterioration.
The water body of the two rivers were mild black and stinking status before
restoration.
The micro-nano bubble and submerged resin floating bed system were combined
to restore the two polluted rivers. During the river treatment process, three areas in the
upper, middle and down stream of River A and five sites of two channels of River B
were monitored. In the twenty days before and after restoration, the water samples
were taken every day for water quality analyses. To monitor the microbial response to
MBSR treatment, some water samples were retrieved on the 3rd and 7th day of
6
restoration. Five hundred milliliters of each water sample was filtered through 0.22
µm membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) and then stored in -80 °C for DNA
extraction.
pH, DO, oxidation reduction potential (ORP) and conductivity of water samples
were measured on-site by a Hach HQ40d multi-probe meter (Hach, Loveland, CO,
USA). The chemical oxygen demand (CODcr), ammonia nitrogen (NH4+-N), total
nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorous (TP) were examined according to the standard
method (APHA, 2012) and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) was measured by
using Hach’s method 8000 (Hach DR/890 colorimeter procedures manual) (Morita et
al., 2011). The number of Escherichia was counted by filtering different dilutions of
water samples and then incubated the filters on Chromocult coliform agar (Merck,
Microbial genomic DNA was extracted using the PowerWater® Sterivex™ DNA
CA, USA). The extracted DNA samples were amplified with a set of primers targeting
the hypervariable V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene (the sequences of 341F/805R
7
respectively) (Herlemann et al., 2011). The concentration of purified amplicons from
each sample was measured using a Qubit dsDNA HS Assay Kit (Life Technologies,
Eugene, OR, USA). Amplicons were processed using Nextera XT DNA Library
The raw paired-end reads were assembled and then quality was filtered using
QIIME v1.9.0. After trimming adapt sequences of the raw reads, the high-quality
reads were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) with 97% sequence
identities. The RDP classifier was used to annotate taxonomic information for each
OTU representative sequence. To analyze the diversity at the alpha level, Chao1 and
ACE indices were computed to estimate microbial richness, and Shannon and
Simpson indices were used to estimate microbial diversity. The common and unique
OTU numbers among samples were analyzed by using the R VennDiagram package.
Hierarchical cluster analysis was carried out using Bray–Curtis similarity based on the
abundance of all OTUs in R software with the statistical package vegan. Principal
dissimilarity using the R statistical vegan package. The relationship between water
quality condition and microbial community was explained by Mantel test and
canonical correlation analysis (CCA), which were calculated by the R ade4 and vegan
packages, respectively. Circos and Heatmap were used to visualize the dominant
8
microbes before and after restoration, which were performed in R software with
3.1 Water quality improvement in the two black and stinking rivers
Some water quality indices, such as DO, pH, conductivity and so on, were used
for river classification and urban impact assessment (Kannel et al., 2007). Analysis of
the physicochemical parameters revealed that the two urban rivers were both close to
mild black and stinking water body (Fig. 1). Before restoration the DO values of
detection sites in Rivers A and B were 1.10–4.53 mg/L and 1.5–5.47 mg/L,
respectively, and it was < 0.1 mg/L for part of locations. After MBSR treatment the
public sense perception of water body improved obviously. The aeration system
producing micro-nano bubble significantly increased the DO values of two rivers (Fig.
1A). In addition, ORP has a three-fold increase in the two rivers (Fig. 1A). The rivers’
pH was about 7.0 and it wasn’t affected by MBSR treatment. In contrast, the
reducing the concentration of inorganic salt and heavy metal in urban rivers.
In this study, the DO increase level of the two urban rivers by micro-nano bubble
was similar with previous studies, which were achieved by intermittent aeration or
aeration combined with plants (Gu et al., 2015; Zhu et al., 2017). However, most of
9
them were lab or pilot mesocosm experiments (Li et al., 2014). The ORP value was
related to DO of urban rivers and high ORP was found to alleviate ammonia and
phosphorus release in the sediment and then to reduce river eutrophication (Li et al.,
2016). In previous study, metals such as chromium, copper and nickel were reported
to interact with organic matter in the aqueous phase and then settled in the sediment to
cause pollution (Pardo et al., 1990). Micro-nano bubble hinders sedimentation and it
was presumed that the decrease of conductivity was mainly due to the adsorption
effect of the submerged resin floating bed system. Metal and salt ions might combine
with soil or other solid-contaminating particles and they were easy to attach onto the
submerged resin floating bed system along with micro-nano bubble flow. The
scanning electron microscope result confirmed that the submerged resin floating bed
system absorbed abundant particles, crystals and bacteria cells. In summary, DO and
MBSR treatment, which was profitable for aerobic bioremediation to remove organic
Excessive organic matter is the main cause of black and stinking urban rivers,
which is reflected by the values of BOD and COD in water body. The value of COD
was four times of that of BOD in the two rivers, suggesting there were a lot of organic
contaminants that could not be degraded by microbes in the rivers (Fig. 1B). After
remediation COD of River A and B decreased 41.49% and 36.37%, respectively. New
pollutant analysis of the resin adsorbents showed that seventeen medicines and
10
azithromycin were present, consistent with the absorption effect of the submerged
resin floating bed system on pollutants in the two rivers. The previous study also has
Point and non-point pollution of nitrogen and phosphorous enter water body and
TP decreased from 7.68 to 4.51 mg/L and from 1.13 to 0.73 mg/L, respectively (Fig.
1C). In contrast, MBSR treatment influenced the NH4+-N and TP contents of River B
little. River B was replenished mainly through tidal water of the adjacent river that
was heavily polluted, and thereby the removal effect of NH4+-N and TP were not as
obvious as River A. Water clarity was increased from 28.1 to 58.4 cm for River A and
from 18.1 to 34.1 cm for River B, respectively (Fig. 1D). The number of facial
coliform was remarkably decreased in the two rivers (Fig. 1D), which could be
attributed to the absorption of the submerged resin floating bed system and nutrition
decrease of the two rivers. Taken together, MBSR showed good effect on the
remediation of the two urban rivers with completely different characteristics. The
black and stinking phenomenon was eliminated in a short period. The black water
conditions and organic and inorganic pollutant levels. In this study, the sequencing
11
results showed that the number of clean sequences was from 32229 to 62129 and the
coverage was more than 97.9%, which reflected the real microbial composition in the
rivers. Before restoration, there were 1621 OTUs and 1858 OTUs in River A and B,
respectively. The Chao and ACE results showed the microbial community richness
was significantly decreased in the two rivers (p < 0.05) and ~50% OTUs disappeared
after MBSR treatment. However, Shannon and Simpon indices displayed that the
diversity changed little, indicating the microbial evenness was higher in the repair
process of the rivers. Further analysis revealed that 391 to 766 unique OTUs were
detected in the restored rivers, indicating the restoration treatment might stimulate
some microbes, which were present but not metabolically active in the two mild black
and stinking rivers. Compared to common and unique genes, the lower core OTU
of the river restoration. Microbes had high sensitivity to changing environment such
rivers (Zeglin et al., 2015). During the river restoration process, the submerged resin
floating bed system absorbed the microorganisms attached onto solid pollutants, and
on the other hand, the decreased values of COD and BOD indicated lower nutrition
for microbial growth in the rivers. Thus, the microbial richness and diversity
significantly reduced after restoration. However, some of the microbial lineages that
were metabolically inactive in the black and stinking urban rivers might be stimulated
In order to illustrate the microbial community evolution before and after the river
12
restoration, PCoA and the cluster tree based on Bray-Crutis were constructed
according to the OTU distribution. PCoA1 and PCoA2 explained 23.79% and 19.45%,
respectively (Fig. 2). For each river, the restored samples were grouped together and
were separated from the unrepaired samples (Fig. 2). The cluster tree also showed
and B3 (the 3th day of River B restoration) was clustered together, suggesting there
were some common microbes in the two stages of the two rivers. The initial pollutant
level of River B was higher than that of River A (Fig. 1), and the pollutant levels of
A0 and B3 might be similar, indicating the microbial community was related to the
polluted level of the rivers. In addition, with the extension of repair time the microbial
community of B7 was clustered with A3 and A7, again indicating that the microbial
community changed with the gradually improved water quality of the two rivers. In
the study on microbial community of sediment, the bacterial community was clustered
suggested that the bacterial biomass varied with the distance of sewage discharge
point and it was related with the COD level of the river (Lin et al., 2015). It has been
acclimated after the oil spill in the river (Acostagonzález et al., 2013). In all, the
results indicated that microbes were sensitive to adjust their composition according to
13
3.3 Microorganisms’ variation after MBSR remediation
and energy cycling and is also a pollution indicator of urban river. To identify which
microbial groups altered in the process of river restoration, the dominant microbes
Flavobacteriia both were predominant in the two unrestored urban rivers (Fig. 3).
was the main group in River B. After restoration, the above microbial groups were
still dominant, but the relative abundance changed. The relative abundance of
the extension of restoration period (Fig. 3). Alphaproteobacteria are widely distributed
marine plankton that constitute over 10% of the open ocean microbial community,
and they behave much like fungi, helping to decompose organic matter.
Actinobacteria has been reported to be significantly higher in all the sediment samples
than that in the surface water (Ibekwe et al., 2016), suggesting MBSR treatment might
promote the migration of microorganisms from the sediment into the overlying water.
Taken together, the results demonstrated that MBSR treatment might activate some
14
process of the two urban rivers.
and Cloacibacterium were abundant before and after restoration in the rivers (Fig. 4).
The MBSR treatment caused the variation of dominant genus. For example, some
Macellibacteroides were abundant in the polluted rivers, but their content was lower
(Caldwell et al., 2011; Luo et al., 2013). Macellibacteroides sp. was reported to be
isolated from an up flow anaerobic filter treating abattoir wastewaters (Jabari et al.,
2012). The above results suggested the microorganisms survived under the low DO
condition were prevailed in the two polluted rivers before restoration. In addition,
Bacteroides and Escherichia species were dominant in the two rivers, which normally
make up the most substantial portion of mammalian gastrointestinal flora. The colony
count result of facial coliform showed these microbes were abundant, indicating
In contrast, the improved water quality was profitable for the growth of
after restoration their abundance was higher than before restoration (Fig. 4). Most of
these genera were Gram-negative, strictly aerobic and motile bacteria such as
freshwater, seawater and sediment (Baek and Jeon, 2014; Kang et al., 2014; Qu and
15
Yuan, 2008). Besides, some of them were functional microbes. For example,
Cellvibrio can degrade cellulose and Limnobacter species have the ability to oxidize
thiosulfate (Berg et al., 2010). The results indicated that micro-nano bubble might
stimulate aerobic bacteria and their metabolic activity favored the removal of
contaminants. In addition, the adsorption of the submerged resin floating bed system
caused the microbial community variations in the rivers. The predominant isolates
from the submerged resin floating bed system were identified to be Acinetobacter,
Aeromonas and E. coli, which confirmed that the resin absorbed fecal coliform and
thereby decreased the microbial abundance of the rivers. Thus, MBSR is favorable to
the removal of fecal coliform and pollutants probably by stimulating the growth of
and comamonas were abundant in A0, Chromatiales, Terracoccus and Azospira were
enriched in A3, and Neisseriales and vogesella were predominant in A7. This
pollutants such as oil spills and domestic and industrial wastewater (Wang et al., 2017;
16
during pollution removal. To get insight into biological processes involving in the
microbial community before and after restoration, the microbial functions were
responsible fore secondary metabolites, transport and catabolism were enriched after
The black and stinking urban rivers with high COD, BOD and NH4+-N were
and the microbial functional categories responsible for transcription and translation
were abundant. This was consistent with the results of the high microbial abundance
and the large number of coliforms before restoration. In addition, the secondary
competed for vegetative growth. In contrast, due to the impact of the adjacent polluted
tide river, the nutrient removal efficiency of River B was lower than that of River A.
Therefore, the corresponding microbial function did not show significant change in
River B. The changes of microbial community function indirectly reflected the effect
of MBSR treatment on nutrient removal of the two black and stinking urban rivers.
17
3.5 Correlation analysis between physiochemical characteristics and microbial
community
functional structure and physiochemical parameters of the two rivers. To discern the
carried out. Four variables (DO, COD, TP and NH4+-N) were selected on the basis of
variance inflation factor (VIF), which formed a significant CCA model (P < 0.05).
Two axes explained 65.4% of microbial community variation (Fig. 6), indicating that
these four variables were major factors shaping microbial community. This finding
was further verified by Mantel test as DO, ORP, COD, BOD, TP and WC showed
correlation with microbial functional structure in River A (P < 0.05), but no separate
(Table 1).
functional structure in River A (Fig. 6). The importance of DO for microbial activity
in water has been reported in previous studies (Simon et al., 2014; Vanderzalm et al.,
2013). In addition, NH4+-N, TP and COD were vital for microbial community
adjacent polluted rivers flooded into river B with tidal water, which affected microbial
18
factors together with the pollution level of the urban rivers affected the microbial
treatment (Sun et al., 2016). In summary, MBSR adjusted the physical and chemical
conditions of the two urban rivers mainly by changing DO, redox potential and
4. Conclusion
MBSR was applied to remediate two black and stinking urban rivers. After
MBSR treatment, the water quality was improved a lot, suggesting MBSR can be
used for in situ remediation of polluted rivers in future. Microbial richness, especially
the number of facial coliform, was significantly decreased in the rivers. The relative
in the process of MBSR remediation. Thus, MBSR improved water quality of polluted
reaction.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young
19
Scholars (No. 51625801), the Scientific Research Foundation for High-level Talents
control and quality improvement of water environment in malodorous black river (No.
AA17202032).
References
biodegradation potential after the prestige oil spill. Environ. Microbiol. 15,
77–83.
3. APHA, 2012. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater.
4. Agarwal, A., Ng, W.J., Liu, Y., 2011. Principle and applications of microbubble and
5. Baek, K., Jeon, C.O., 2014. Rheinheimera gaetbuli, sp. nov. a marine bacterium
6. Beale, D.J., Karpe, A.V., Ahmed, W., Palombo, E.A., 2017. A community
20
multi-omics approach towards the assessment of surface water quality in an
urban river system. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 14, 303–310.
7. Berg, B., Von, H. B., Pettersson G., 2010. Electronmicroscopie observations on the
8. Caldwell, M.E., Allen, T.D., Lawson, P.A., Tanner, R.S., 2011. Tolumonas
osonensis sp. nov. isolated from anoxic freshwater sediment, and emended
description of the genus Tolumonas. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 61, 2659–2665.
9. Chen, Y., Liu, Y., Li, Y., Wu, Y., Chen, Y., Zeng, G., Zhang, J., Li, H., 2017.
347–355.
10. Coleman, J.J., Ghosh, S., Okoli, I., Mylonakis, E., 2011. Antifungal activity of
11. Gu, D., Xu, H., He, Y., Zhao, F., Huang, M., 2015. Remediation of urban river
12. Haque, N., Kwon, S.H., 2017. Nutrient dynamics study of overlying water
13. Herlemann, D.P., Labrenz, M., Jurgens, K., Bertilsson, S., Waniek, J.J., Andersson,
21
gradient of the Baltic Sea. ISME J. 5, 1571–1579.
14. Hu, L., Xia, Z., 2017. Application of ozone micro-nano-bubbles to groundwater
15. Ibekwe, A.M., Ma, J., Murinda, S.E., 2016. Bacterial community composition and
16. Jabari, L., Gannoun, H., Cayol, J.L., 2012. Macellibacteroides fermentans gen.
upflow anaerobic filter treating abattoir wastewaters. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.
62, 2522–2527.
17. Ji, X., Zhang, W., Jiang, M., He, J., Zheng, Z., 2017. Black-odor water analysis
and heavy metal distribution of Yitong River in Northeast China. Water Sci.
18. Kang, H., Kim, H., Lee, B.I., Joung, Y., Joh, K., 2014. Sediminibacterium
goheungense sp. nov. isolated from a freshwater reservoir. Int. J. Syst. Evol.
19. Kannel, P.R., Lee, S., Lee, Y.S., Kanel, S.R., Khan, S.P., 2007. Application of
water quality indices and dissolved oxygen as indicators for river water
93–110.
20. Lee, J., Shin, S.G., Han, G., Koo, T., Hwang, S., 2017. Bacteria and archaea
22
food wastewater: Key process parameters and microbial indicators of process
21. Li, J., Lin, S., Qin, S., 2016. Characteristics of sediment bacterial community in
196–206.
22. Li, H., Hu, L., Song, D., Altabbaa, A., 2014. Subsurface transport behavior of
23. Li, Z., Sheng, Y., Yang, J., Burton, E.D., 2016. Phosphorus release from coastal
24. Lin, S., Wang, Y., Lin, J., Quan, C., 2015. Response of planktonic and benthic
the second Songhua River, China. Clean - Soil Air Water 42, 1376–1383.
25. Liu, J., Wang, F., Liu, W., Tang, C., Wu, C., Wu, Y., 2016. Nutrient removal by
up-scaling a hybrid floating treatment bed (HFTB) using plant and periphyton:
26. Luo, J., Jia, Y., He, H., Jin, T., Zhou, L., Wang, M., Zhou, M., 2013. A new
27. Mi, Y., He, C., Bian, H., Cai, Y., Sheng, L., Ma L., 2015. Ecological engineering
restoration of a non-point source polluted river in Northern China. Ecol. Eng. 76,
23
142–150.
28. Morita, M., Malvankar, N.S., Franks, A.E., Summers, Z.M., Giloteaux, L., Rotaru,
A.E., Rotaru, C., Lovley, D.R., 2011. Potential for direct interspecies electron
29. Noorhosseini, S.A., Ashoori, D., Alishiri, R., 2015. Effective factors on increasing
rivers pollution and its control strategies. MAGNT. Res. Rep. 3, 159–163.
30. Pardo, R., Barrado, E., Lourdes, P., Vega, M., 1990. Determination and speciation
of heavy metals in sediments of the Pisuerga river. Water Res. 24, 373–379.
31. Pi, Y, Chen, B, Bao, M, Fan, F., Cai, Q., Ze, L., Zhang, B., 2017. Microbial
32. Qu, J.H., Yuan, H.L., 2008. Sediminibacterium salmoneum gen. nov. sp. nov. a
33. Sack, E.L., Pw, V.D.W., Van, d.K. D., 2014. Polysaccharides and proteins added to
34. Simon, H.M., Smith, M.W., Herfort, L., 2014. Metagenomic insights into particles
5, 466–476.
35. Sun, Y., Shen, Y.X., Liang, P., Zhou, J., Yang, Y., Huang X., 2014. Linkages
24
between microbial functional potential and wastewater constituents in large-scale
162–168.
36. Vanderzalm, J.L., Page, D.W., Barry, K.E., Dillon, P.J., 2013. Application of a
storage and recovery (ASR) in an anoxic carbonate aquifer. Water Res. 47,
2177–2189.
37. Viswanathan, V.C., Schirmer, M., 2015. Water quality deterioration as a driver for
river restoration: a review of case studies from Asia, Europe and North America.
38. Wang, P., Wang, X., Wang, C., Miao, L., Hou, J., Yuan, Q., 2017. Shift in
along the Yarlung Tsangpo River on the Tibetan Plateau, China. Sci. Rep. 7,
12529–12535.
39. Xie, Y., Wang, J., Wu, Y., Chen, R., Song, C., Yang, J., Yu, H., Giesy, J.P., Zhang,
40. Yuan, X., Qian, X., Zhang, R., Ye, R., Hu, W., 2012. Performance and microbial
41. Zeglin, L.H., Dahm, C.N., Barrett, J.E., Gooseff, M.N., Fitpatrick,
25
S.K., Takacs-Vesbach C.D., 2011. Bacterial community structure along moisture
43. Zhao, X.D., Gong, Y.F., Zhou, Z., 2013. Study on removal of organic matters in
surface water by adsorption resin SD500. Adv. Mater. Res. 610–613, 1383–1386.
26
Figure captions
Fig. 1. The water quality improvement of the two black and stinking rivers after
MBSR restoration (A: DO and ORP; B: COD and BOD; C: NH4+-N and TP; D: WC
and FC).
Fig. 3. Relationship between the samples and microbes at the class level was
displayed by the Circos analysis, showing the dominant microbial composition in the
different restoration phases of the two black and stinking urban rivers.
Fig. 4. The response of the predominant genera to MBSR restoration in the two black
proteins) displayed the difference of microbial function before and after restoration in
River A (The left panel showed the abundance ratio of different functional groups
before and after restoration; the middle showed the percentage of functional group
abundance within the 95% confidence interval; the rightmost value is p value; p <
27
Fig. 1. The water quality improvement of the two black and stinking rivers after
MBSR restoration (A: DO and ORP; B: COD and BOD; C: NH4+-N and TP; D: WC
and FC).
28
Fig. 2. PCoA analysis demonstrated the dissimilarity of microbial community
29
Fig. 3. Relationship between the samples and microbes at the class level was
displayed by the Circos analysis, showing the dominant microbial composition in the
different restoration phases of the two black and stinking urban rivers.
30
Fig. 4. The response of the predominant genera to MBSR restoration in the two black
31
Fig. 5. Functional groups according to COG categories (clusters of orthologous
proteins) displayed the difference of microbial function before and after restoration in
River A (The left panel showed the abundance ratio of different functional groups
before and after restoration; the middle showed the percentage of functional group
abundance within the 95% confidence interval; the rightmost value is p value; p <
32
Fig. 6. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) of microbial community and
33
Table 1
River A River B
Note: Boldface values indicate significant correlation (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01).
34
Highlights:
MBSR is used for the remediation of two black and stinking urban rivers.
35
Graphical abstract
36