Download as pdf
Download as pdf
You are on page 1of 2
3340 Dagat -Dagatan Ave. Brgy. 35, Caloocan City March 23, 2011 ATTY. ROMEO G. ASTREROGR. Investigation Agent Anti-Fraud and Action Division National Bureau of Investigation Taft Avenue, Manila Sir; By virtue of SPECIAL. POWER OF ATTORNEY issued in my taver by MR GEORGE P. AMPII. being the legal and surviving heirs of the late, Dr. JESUS AMPIL, who is one of the children and legal heirs of the late Spouses EXEQUIEI. AMPIL. and PRISCILA MONZON who died on march 22, 1986 at Greenhils, San Ju. etro. Manila, May T have the honor to submit to your office additional information relative to our complaint for AND FRAUD on the basis for the issuance of TCT No. 49756, TCT No. 473240-R7-657 and ‘TCT No. 25513; Based an traceback of OCT 2498, Decree No. 67403, ML.R.O. No. 1488 : 106, 11-9979 the ICY No. 25513 in NAME OF FRANCISCO REYES & ISASET STA MARIA with an Ares of 159,870 derived frum ‘TCT No. 8672 owned by the spouses. EXEQUIEL AMPIL é& PRISCILA MONZON. Annex “A”. ‘ICT No. 25513 transferred to TCT No. 461378, TCT No. 465101, TC No. 473240, TCT No. 496756, TCT No. 497194, TCT No. 692705, TCT No. 698398 and the !ast TCI No. 726696, respectively in the name of SILVERGATF REALTY & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, claiming now as the owner of said pronerty, all of the above title derived from TCT No. 25513 which as per certification of the Register of Deed, for the province of Rizal, as per Verification of their records, it appears that THI OF! COPY OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS WiIICH WAS THE BASIS FOR THE ISSUANCE Oi ‘THiLE CANNOT BE LOCATED DESPITE DFLIGENT EFFORTS XERTED BY it VAULT PERSONNEL ANNEX B, B1- This is very clear that all the tile derived trom TCT No. 25513 in the name of Francisco Reyes & Isabel Sta, Maria t’ at cancelled TCT No. 8672 registered in the name of Exequiel Ampil & Priscila Monzon, from the beginning TCT No. 25513 is ¥AKIE & SFURIOUS. This is what somebody called “S, AK BUNOT. It is also sury Wg, that ail the above Title APPEARS NO SUPPORTING ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS WIIICH WAS THE BASIS for the ISSUANCE of Title. This is against the basic requirement for Registration of Title. They cannot invoke purchases for values and in good faith, but whose title is only a derivative of the Void Title and could not possible be of force and effect more than its parent title. (Guillermo of Mas Carinas) vs Hon. Court of Appeals and spouses JOSE LEELIN and LILIA SEVILLA) (G.R. No. 962599, 96274) Going back to the true and legal owner of the properties; 1, TCT No. $67: Monzon, as derived from TCT No. 2498 owned by Exequiel Amp and Pricila per Decree No, 67405; certified copy attached ANNEX “(" 2. Portion of said property Lot No. 3, Plan 11-9979, Exequiel Ampil executed Deed of Sale in favor to Dr. Jesus Ampil on August 3, 1938, CERTIFIED by RTC on March Mi, 2010 ANNEX “D”; With declaration of Real Property Tax No. 5497; ANNEX “E' WHEREFORE, it is most respectfully requested that PROPER ACTION be conducted, that TCT No. 25513 and the following TCT No. 461578, TCT No. 465101, TCT No. 473240, TCT No. 496756, TCT No. 497194, TCT No. 692705, TCT No. 698398 and TCT No. 726696 issued without supporting documents which was the basis of ISSUANCE of the title be recommended to the LAND REGISTRATION AUTHORITY to RECALL the above cited title which is FAKE and/or SPURIOUS from the bejinning, Your favorable action on the matter would be highly appreciated, Thank you very much. Very truly yours. GEORGE P. AMPIL i SANTILLAN n-tact Copy furnished 1. Office of the Secretary Dept. of Justice Taft Avenue, Manila 2. Office of the Ombudsman Agham Ri., Diliman, Quezon City 3. Hon, Eulalio Diaz Administrator Land Registration Authority East Avenue, Quezon City

You might also like