Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pr. 15 LSD
Pr. 15 LSD
Pr. 15 LSD
Tribhuvan University
Level: BSc.CSIT (3 Sem) Amrit Campus
Roll no: 06 Statistics-II Date: 2081/01/04
Sec: B Practical Number: 15
A B C D E F G H I J K L
1
2 Q no.15) The following is the table is the 5×5 Latin square design for data taken from a manurial experiment with
3 sugarcane. The five treatments were applied
4 Column
Row
5 I II III IV V
6 I A 52.5 E 46.3 D 44.1 C 48.1 B 40.9
7 II D 44.2 B 42.9 A 51.3 E 49.3 C 32.6
8 III B 49.1 A 47.3 C 38.1 D 41.0 E 47.2
9 IV C 43.2 D 42.5 E 67.2 B 55.1 A 45.3
10 V E 47.0 C 43.2 B 46.7 A 46.0 D 43.2
11 Analyze the above data to find if there are any treatments effects.
12
13 Test Hypothesis:
14 H0R: There is no significant difference between rows.
15 H1R: There is significant difference between rows.
16 H0C: There is no significant difference between columns.
17 H1C: There is significant difference between columns.
18 H0T: There is no significant difference between treatments.
19 H1T: There is significant difference between treatments.
20
21 Test Statistics:
22 The test statistic for the Latin Square Design (LSD) are given below:
23 𝐹𝑅=𝑀𝑆𝑅/ 𝐹𝐶=𝑀𝑆𝐶/ 𝐹𝑇=𝑀𝑆𝑇/
24 𝑀𝑆𝐸 𝑀𝑆𝐸 𝑀𝑆𝐸
25 where, MSR = Mean sum of square due to row MSC = Mean sum of square due to column
26 MSE = Mean sum of square due to error MST = Mean sum of square due to treatment
27
28 Decision:
29 Critical value approach:
30 Reject H0R at α% level of significance if FR > Fα{(m-1),(m-1)(m-2)}, accept otherwise.
31 Reject H0C at α% level of significance if FC > Fα{(m-1),(m-1)(m-2)}, accept otherwise.
32 Reject H0T at α% level of significance if FT > Fα{(m-1),(m-1)(m-2)}, accept otherwise.
33
34 SPSS Syntax:
35 DATASET ACTIVATE DataSet1.
36 UNIANOVA Value BY Row Column Treatment
37 /METHOD=SSTYPE(3)
38 /INTERCEPT=INCLUDE
39 /POSTHOC=Row Column Treatment(LSD)
40 /CRITERIA=ALPHA(0.05)
41 /DESIGN=Row Column Treatment.
42
43 SPSS Output:
44 Between-Subjects Factors
45 Value
Label N
46 Row 1 5
47 2 5
48 3 5
49 4 5
50 5 5
51 Column 1 5
52 2 5
53 3 5
54 4 5
55 5 5
56 Treatment 1 A 5
57 2 B 5
58 3 C 5
59 4 D 5
60 5 E 5
61
62
63
64 Tests of Between-Subjects Effects
Kritisha Shrestha 1 of 1
rd
Tribhuvan University
Level: BSc.CSIT (3 Sem) Amrit Campus
Roll no: 06 Statistics-II Date: 2081/01/04
Sec: B Practical Number: 15
A B C D E F G H I J K L
65 Dependent Variable:
Kritisha Shrestha 2 of 2
rd
Tribhuvan University
Level: BSc.CSIT (3 Sem) Amrit Campus
Roll no: 06 Statistics-II Date: 2081/01/04
Sec: B Practical Number: 15
4
A B C D E F G H I J K L
127 3 -1.580 3.1838 0.629 -8.517 5.357
128 5 6.060 3.1838 0.081 -0.877 12.997
129 5 1 -5.360 3.1838 0.118 -12.297 1.577
130 2 -2.600 3.1838 0.430 -9.537 4.337
131 3 -7.640* 3.1838 0.034 -14.577 -0.703
132 4 -6.060 3.1838 0.081 -12.997 0.877
133 Based on observed means.
The
*. error
The meanterm is MeanisSquare(Error)
difference significant at =the
25.341.
0.05 level.
134
135
136 Treatment:
137 Multiple Comparisons
138 Dependent Variable:
139 LSD
140 95% Confidence Interval
Mean
141 Difference Lower Upper
(I) Treatment (I-J) Std. Error Sig. Bound Bound
142 A B 1.540 3.1838 0.637 -5.397 8.477
143 C 7.440* 3.1838 0.038 0.503 14.377
144 D 5.480 3.1838 0.111 -1.457 12.417
145 E -2.920 3.1838 0.377 -9.857 4.017
146 B A -1.540 3.1838 0.637 -8.477 5.397
147 C 5.900 3.1838 0.089 -1.037 12.837
148 D 3.940 3.1838 0.240 -2.997 10.877
149 E -4.460 3.1838 0.187 -11.397 2.477
150 C A -7.440* 3.1838 0.038 -14.377 -0.503
151 B -5.900 3.1838 0.089 -12.837 1.037
152 D -1.960 3.1838 0.550 -8.897 4.977
153 E -10.360* 3.1838 0.007 -17.297 -3.423
154 D A -5.480 3.1838 0.111 -12.417 1.457
155 B -3.940 3.1838 0.240 -10.877 2.997
156 C 1.960 3.1838 0.550 -4.977 8.897
157 E -8.400* 3.1838 0.022 -15.337 -1.463
158 E A 2.920 3.1838 0.377 -4.017 9.857
159 B 4.460 3.1838 0.187 -2.477 11.397
160 C 10.360* 3.1838 0.007 3.423 17.297
161 D 8.400* 3.1838 0.022 1.463 15.337
162 Based on observed means.
The
*. Theerror
meanterm is MeanisSquare(Error)
difference significant at =the
25.341.
0.05 level.
163
164
165 Level of significance (α) = 0.05
166 At 5% level of significance,
167 Ftab= F0.05(4,12)= 3.259167
168
169 Decision:
170 =IF(F69>D168,"H0R is rejected, i.e., H1R is
H0R is accepted i.e., H1R is rejected.
171 accepeted","H0R is accepted i.e., H1R is rejected.")
172
173 =IF(F70>D168,"H0C is rejected, i.e., H1C is
H0C is accepted i.e., H1C is rejected.
174 accepeted","H0C is accepted i.e., H1C is rejected.")
175
176 =IF(F71>D168,"H0T is rejected, i.e., H1T is
H0T is rejected, i.e., H1T is accepeted
177 accepeted","H0T is accepted i.e., H1T is rejected.")
178
179 Conclusion:
180 Hence, there is no significant difference between rows, there is no significant difference between columns and there is
181 significant difference between treatments.
Kritisha Shrestha 3 of 3