Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Consensus Statement Urolithiasis FINAL
Consensus Statement Urolithiasis FINAL
Consensus Statement Urolithiasis FINAL
2 0 2 2 A A F P C O N S E N S U S S TAT E M E N T
Urolith management was once the sole province of the veterinary surgeon. However, a
better understanding of the causes and risk factors of urolith formation have changed the
treatment landscape. Therapeutic diets, miniaturization of equipment, and advanced
technologies have provided a unique opportunity for veterinarians to practice advanced
compassionate care that was not available in the past. The challenge for clinicians today
is to move beyond traditional surgery and consider less invasive alternatives. The following
are patient-centered, research, and experience-supported recommendations for the treatment This AAFP
of cystoliths in cats.
Consensus
How do You Know if a Cat of commercial cat foods was considered a Statement
has Stones? primary factor because urine acidification
reduced struvite precipitation and increased provides
Depending on the size, location, and contour of urinary calcium excretion. Now that diet
uroliths, clinical signs vary from asymptomatic manufacturers modulate urine acidification, the patient-centered,
to life-threatening urethral or ureteral obstruc- prevalence of struvite and calcium oxalate are
tion. Bladder stones are often associated with research, and
about equal with struvite slightly over represented.
hematuria and bladder pain causing cats to experience-
urinate more frequently and often outside of the The most common urocystoliths in cats are
litter pan.1 Kidney and ureteral stones are also composed of calcium oxalate or struvite supported
associated with hematuria but changes in urination (magnesium ammonium phosphate;) with approx-
are uncommon. Instead, cats exhibit abdominal imately equal numbers and accounting for 90 to recommendations
pain, irritability, and signs secondary to azotemia 95% of uroliths in cats around the world.4 – 7
(e.g. decreased appetite). Urate stones are the next most common (~5% of for the
feline uroliths); other types such as cystine, treatment of
Medical imaging remains the gold standard for xanthine, dried solidified blood, and others are
urolith detection. Anecdotally, many urinary less common and are not discussed here. cystoliths in cats.
stones are detected incidentally in animals having
imaging performed for unrelated reasons. Most While definitive diagnosis of the type of urolith
uroliths are radiopaque and visible by survey requires ex-vivo analysis, there are some
radiography. Ultrasound has the advantage of radiographic, urinalysis, and systemic characteristics
detecting less-radiopaque stones like those that may be used to suggest the type of stone
composed of mineralized blood and urate, but it present.
is challenging to image uroliths in the urethra
and mid-ureter. Detection of urolithiasis Why Predict Urolith Composition
increases when radiography and ultrasonography Prior to Removal?
are employed together.
Therapeutic options for urolith removal and
What Types of Uroliths prevention are based on the prediction of urolith
are Common? composition. For example, struvite uroliths can
be dissolved rapidly with an appropriate
Between 1985 and 1995, struvite was the most therapeutic diet. In addition, urolith composition
common urolith, accounting for approximately may be a biological marker for diseases such as
80% of feline urinary tract stones.2, 3 During that portosystemic shunts. Knowing stone composition
time, the prevalence of calcium oxalate was is essential prior to stone removal to minimize
steadily increasing. By 1995, calcium oxalate adverse sequela and strengthen prevention strategies
surpassed struvite and remained the most to lower the chance of recurrence.
common feline stone for a decade. The reason for
the shift is unknown, however over-acidification
Consider Medical
Dissolution
If Not Successful,
Consider Surgical Cystotomy
What Minimally Invasive Options Are urinary tract stones consist of voiding urohy-
Available to Remove Bladder Uroliths? Minimally dropropulsion (VUH), cystoscopic stone basket
retrieval, intracorporeal lithotripsy, and percutaneous
Lower urinary tract stones, not amenable to medical invasive cystolithotomy (PCCL).
dissolution, can be removed through various
minimally invasive methods. Stone removal is approaches
Minimally invasive urolith removal should be
generally recommended as their presence can induce have a considered, discussed, and offered to caregivers of
inflammation, obstruction, or recurrent infection. cats suffering from urinary tract conditions after
Surgical removal of uroliths by cystotomy or urethro- multitude of attempting a dissolution approach. While at times
tomy has been the traditional method of choice. advantages appearing technically simple, these procedures have
However, surgical cystotomy and urethrotomy have been associated with serious complications when
been associated with complications such as urine over standard performed by inadequately trained personnel and
leakage, wound dehiscence, bleeding, stricture surgery should be referred to a formally trained and
formation, and incomplete stone removal in 20% of experienced specialist.
canine patients alone. Suture material within the such as
urethra or bladder wall may serve as a nidus for Removal of lower urinary tract stones is amenable to
future stone formation in stone-forming patients.
shorter
various interventional approaches depending on the
Upon analysis of recurrent lower urinary tract stones hospitalization sex of the cat, type of stone present, and stone burden
in patients having undergone surgical cystotomy,
9.4% were suture-induced.16 Recently, complications times, little to (number and size of stones). Considering minimally
invasive approaches to stone removal in lieu of
associated with traditional surgical cystotomy, no recovery surgical cystotomy is recommended. Correct meas-
regardless of closure method, were reported in 37%
to 50% of cases,17 with a mean duration of hospital- time, and less urement of stone size is critical in the selection of the
most appropriate intervention. Uroliths should be
ization of four days. Minimally invasive approaches discomfort. measured by standard radiography (or contrast radi-
have a multitude of advantages over standard surgery ography for radiolucent stones) using a radiopaque
such as shorter hospitalization times, little to no marker rather than by ultrasound which tends to
recovery time and less discomfort. In small animals, overestimate urolith size and underestimate the
minimally invasive treatment options for lower number of uroliths.